Skip to main content
Log in

Schedule-dependent interaction between Doxorubicin and mTHPC-mediated photodynamic therapy in murine hepatoma in vitro and in vivo

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate cytotoxic and antitumor effects of a conventional anticancer drug Doxorubicin (Dox) and photodynamic therapy (PDT) mediated by a promising photosensitizer of second generation meta-tetra (3-hydroxyphenyl)-chlorin (mTHPC) in combination. Methods: Murine hepatoma MH-22A was used for investigation in vitro and in vivo. In vitro, the cells were incubated with 0.15 μg/ml mTHPC for 18 h and exposed to light from LED array (λ= 660±20 nm) at 0.6–2.4 kJ/m2. 0.05–0.2 μg/ml Dox was administered either 24 h prior to or immediately after light exposure (Dox→PDT or PDT + Dox, respectively). The cytotoxicity was tested by staining with crystal violet. The character of the combined effect was assessed by multiple regression analysis. In vivo, the antitumor activity was estimated by monitoring the tumor volume over time, in mice transplanted subcutaneously with MH-22A and treated with Dox and/or PDT. For PDT, mice were exposed to light from diode laser (λ=650±2 nm) at 12 kJ/m2 following 24 h after administration of 0.15 mg/kg mTHPC. A 3 mg/kg Dox was administered either within 15 min prior to mTHPC or within 15 min after light exposure (Dox→PDT or PDT + Dox, respectively). Results: Both in vitro and in vivo, the combination of mTHPC-mediated PDT and Dox was evaluated to be more effective than each treatment alone. In vitro, the difference between cell viability curves after photodynamic treatment as a single modality and after combination of photodynamic treatment with Dox was statistically significant under most of the applied conditions (P≤0.02). In the case of PDT + Dox, the combination had an additive character, and the sequence Dox→PDT caused a sub-additive interaction. In vivo, both regimens of combination were more effective in inhibiting tumor growth than any single treatment (P<0.09). The antitumor activity of PDT + Dox regimen was more prominent than that of Dox→PDT; however, significance of the difference was not high (P=0.08). Conclusions: These results indicate that Dox potentiates therapeutic efficacy of mTHPC-mediated PDT and vice versa, and the degree of potentiation is influenced by the combination schedule: administration of Dox immediately after light exposure is preferable to administration of Dox at 24 h prior to light exposure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Baas P, Murrer L, Zoetmulder FA, Stewart FA, Ris HB, Van Zandwijk N, Peterse JL, Rutgers EJ (1997) Photodynamic therapy as adjuvant therapy in surgically treated pleural malignancies. Br J Cancer 76:819–826

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bonnett R, White RD, Winfield UJ, Berenbaum MC (1989) Hydroporphyrins of the meso-tetra(hydroxyphenyl)porphyrin series as tumour photosensitizers. Biochem J 261:277–280

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bonnett R (1999) Photodynamic therapy in historical perspective. Rev Contemp Pharmacother 10:1–17

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Boyle RW, Dolphin D (1996) Structure and biodistribution relationships of photodynamic sensitizers. Photochem Photobiol 64:469–485

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Brophy PF, Keller SM (1992) Adriamycin enhanced in vitro and in vivo photodynamic therapy of mesothelioma. J Surg Res 52:632–634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Canti G, Nicolin A, Cubeddu R, Taroni P, Bandieramonte G, Valentini G (1998) Antitumor efficacy of the combination of photodynamic therapy and chemotherapy in murine tumors. Cancer Lett 125:39–44

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Casas A, Fukuda H, Riley P, Batlle AM (1997) Enhancement of aminolevulinic acid based photodynamic therapy by adriamycin. Cancer Lett 121:105–113

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Cowled PA, Mackenzie L, Forbes IJ (1987) Pharmacological modulation of photodynamic therapy with hematoporphyrin derivative and light. Cancer Res 47:971–974

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Dilkes MG, Benjamin E, Ovaisi S, Banerjee AS (2003) Treatment of primary mucosal head and neck squamous cell carcinoma using photodynamic therapy: results after 25 treated cases. J Laryngol Otol 117:713–717

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Dolmans DE, Fukumura D, Jain RK (2003) Photodynamic therapy for cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 3:380–387

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Dougherty TJ, Gomer CJ, Henderson BW, Jori G, Kessel D, Korbelik M, Moan J, Peng Q (1998) Photodynamic therapy. J Natl Cancer Inst 90:889–905

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Friedberg JS, Mick R, Stevenson J, Metz J, Zhu T, Buyske J, Sterman DH, Pass HI, Glatstein E, Hahn SM (2003) A phase I study of Foscan-mediated photodynamic therapy and surgery in patients with mesothelioma. Ann Thorac Surg 75:952–959

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gelshtein VI (1971) Progression of transplanted murine hepatomas. Cytologiya 13:3–13

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Gonzalez S, Arnfield MR, Meeker BE, Tulip J, Lakey WH, Chapman JD, McPhee MS (1986) Treatment of Dunning R3327-AT rat prostate tumors with photodynamic therapy in combination with misonidazole. Cancer Res 46:2858–2862

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Herrera-Ornelas L, Petrelli NJ, Mittelman A, Dougherty TJ, Boyle DG (1986) Photodynamic therapy in patients with colorectal cancer. Cancer 57:677–684

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ito M (1984) Microassay for studying anticellular effects of human interferon. J Interferon Res 4:603–609

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kirveliene V, Prasmickaite L, Kadziauskas J, Bonnett R, Djelal BD, Juodka B (1997) Post-exposure processes in Temoporfin photosensitized cells in vitro: reliance on energy metabolism. J Photochem Photobiol B Biol 41:173–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kostron H, Fritsch E, Grunert V (1988) Photodynamic therapy of malignant brain tumours: a phase I/II trial. Br J Neurosurg 2:241–248

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ma L, Moan J, Berg K (1994) Evaluation of a new photosensitizer, meso-tetra-hydroxyphenyl-chlorin, for use in photodynamic therapy: a comparison of its photobiological properties with those of two other photosensitizers. Int J Cancer 57:883–888

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Mickuviene I, Kirveliene V, Juodka B (2004) Experimental survey of non-clonogenic viability assays for adherent cells in vitro. Toxicol In Vitro 18:639–648

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Moan J, Berg K (1991) The photodegradation of porphyrins in cells can be used to estimate the lifetime of singlet oxygen. Photochem Photobiol 53:549–553

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Nahabedian MY, Cohen RA, Contino MF, Terem TM, Wright WH, Berns MW, Wile AG (1988) Combination cytotoxic chemotherapy with cisplatin or doxorubicin and photodynamic therapy in murine tumors. J Natl Cancer Inst 80:739–743

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Nathan TR, Whitelaw DE, Chang SC, Lees WR, Ripley PM, Payne H, Jones L, Parkinson MC, Emberton M, Gillams AR, Mundy AR, Bown SG (2002) Photodynamic therapy for prostate cancer recurrence after radiotherapy: a phase I study. J Urol 168:1427–1432

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Peterson CM, Shiah JG, Sun Y, Kopeckova P, Minko T, Straight RC, Kopecek J (2003) HPMA copolymer delivery of chemotherapy and photodynamic therapy in ovarian cancer. Adv Exp Med Biol 519:101–123

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Priebe W (ed) (1995) Anthracycline antibiotics. New analogues, methods of delivery, and mechanisms of action. American Chemical Society, Washington DC, 380 p

  26. Ris HB, Altermatt HJ, Nachbur B, Stewart CM, Wang Q, Lim CK, Bonnett R, Althaus U (1996) Intraoperative photodynamic therapy with m-tetrahydroxyphenylchlorin for chest malignancies. Lasers Surg Med 18:39–45

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Rovers JP, Sarnak AE, Molina A, Schuitmaker JJ, Sterenborg HJ, Terpsta OT (1999) Effective treatment of liver metastases with photodynamic therapy, using the second-generation photosensitizer meta-tetra(hydroxyphenyl)chlorin (mTHPC), in rat model. Br J Cancer 81:600–608

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Smith PK, Krohn RI, Hermanson GT, Mallia AK, Gartner FH, Provenzano MD, Fujimoto EK, Goeke NM, Olson BJ, Klenk DC (1985) Measurement of protein using bicinchoninic acid. Anal Biochem 150:76–85

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Snyder JW, Greco WR, Bellnier DA, Vaughan L, Henderson BW (2003) Photodynamic therapy: a means to enhanced drug delivery to tumors. Cancer Res 63:8126–8131

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Streckyte G, Didziapetriene J, Grazeliene G, Prasmickiene G, Sukeliene D, Kazlauskaite N, Characiejus D, Griciute L, Rotomskis R (1999) Effects of photodynamic therapy in combination with adriamycin. Cancer Lett 143:1–14

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Teiten M-H, Bezdetnaya L, Morliere P, Santus R, Guillemin F (2003) Endoplasmic reticulum and Golgi apparatus are the preferential sites of Foscan localisation in cultured tumour cells. Br J Cancer 88:146–152

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. van Geel IP, Oppelaar H, Oussoren YG, Schuitmaker JJ, Stewart FA (1995) Mechanisms for optimising photodynamic therapy: second generation photosensitisers in combination with mitomycin C. Br J Cancer 72:344–350

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Wang JC (1996) DNA topoisomerases. Annu Rev Biochem 65:635–692

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Weaver JL, Pine PS, Aszalos A, Schoenlein PV, Currier SJ, Padmanabhan R, Gottesman MM (1991) Laser scanning and confocal microscopy of daunorubicin, doxorubicin and rhodamine 123 in multidrug-resistant cells. Exp Cell Res 196:323–329

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Zimmermann A, Ritsch-Marte M, Kostron H (2001) mTHPC-mediated photodynamic diagnosis of malignant brain tumors. Photochem Photobiol 74:611–616

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Zimmermann A, Walt H, Haller U, Baas P, Klein SD (2003) Effects of chlorin-mediated photodynamic therapy combined with fluoropyrimidines in vitro and in a patient. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 51:147–154

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are indebted to Prof. R. Bonnett (Queen Mary, University of London, UK) for the generous gift of m-THPC and V. Piskarskiene for the excellent care of the cells. This work was partly supported by the European Commission, Program of Centers of Excellence, project CEBIOLA, ICA1-CT-2000–70027, and Lithuanian State Foundation for Science and Studies, Program Light in Biomedicine, P-14/01.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. Kirveliene.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kirveliene, V., Grazeliene, G., Dabkeviciene, D. et al. Schedule-dependent interaction between Doxorubicin and mTHPC-mediated photodynamic therapy in murine hepatoma in vitro and in vivo. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 57, 65–72 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-005-0006-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-005-0006-7

Keywords

Navigation