Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Classical and nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: an evaluation of the risk of injury to the autonomous pelvic nerves

  • Anatomic Bases of Medical, Radiological and Surgical Techniques
  • Published:
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Radical hysterectomy represents the treatment of choice for FIGO stage IA2–IIA cervical cancer. It is associated with several serious complications such as urinary and anorectal dysfunction due to surgical trauma to the autonomous nervous system. In order to determine those surgical steps involving the risk of nerve injury during both classical and nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy, we investigated the relationships between pelvic fascial, vascular and nervous structures in a large series of embalmed and fresh female cadavers. We showed that the extent of potential denervation after classical radical hysterectomy is directly correlated with the radicality of the operation. The surgical steps that carry a high risk of nerve injury are the resection of the uterosacral and vesicouterine ligaments and of the paracervix. A nerve-sparing approach to radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer is feasible if specific resection limits, such as the deep uterine vein, are carefully identified and respected. However, a nerve-sparing surgical effort should be balanced with the oncological priorities of removal of disease and all its potential routes of local spread.

Résumé

L'hystérectomie radicale est le traitement de choix pour les cancers du col utérin de stade IA2–IIA de la Fédération Internationale de Gynécologie Obstétrique (FIGO). Cette intervention comporte plusieurs séquelles graves, telles que les dysfonctions urinaires ou ano-rectales, par traumatisme chirurgical des nerfs végétatifs pelviens. Pour mettre en évidence les temps chirurgicaux impliquant un risque de lésion nerveuse lors d'une hystérectomie radicale classique et avec préservation nerveuse, nous avons recherché les rapports entre le fascia pelvien, les structures vasculaires et nerveuses sur une large série de sujets anatomiques féminins embaumés et non embaumés. Nous avons montré que l'étendue de la dénervation potentielle après hystérectomie radicale classique était directement en rapport avec le caractère radical de l'intervention. Les temps chirurgicaux à haut risque pour des lésions nerveuses sont la résection des ligaments utéro-sacraux, des ligaments vésico-utérins et du paracervix. L'hystérectomie radicale avec préservation nerveuse est possible si des limites de résection spécifiques telle que la veine utérine profonde sont soigneusement identifiées et respectées. Cependant une chirurgie de préservation nerveuse doit être mise en balance avec les priorités carcinologiques d'exérèse du cancer et de toutes ses voies potentielles de dissémination locale.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barnes W, Waggoner S, Delgado G, Maher K, Potkul R, Barter J, Benjamin S (1991) Manometric characterization of rectal dysfunction following radical hysterectomy. Gynecol Oncol 42: 116–119

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Brown JS, Sawaya G, Thom DH, Grady D (2000) Hysterectomy and urinary incontinence: a systematic review. Lancet 356: 535–539

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Butler-Manuel SA, Buttery LDK, A'Hern RP, Polak JM, Barton DPJ (2000) Pelvic nerve plexus trauma at radical hysterectomy and simple hysterectomy. Cancer 89: 834–841

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Curtis AH, Anson BJ, Beaton LE (1942) The anatomy of subperitoneal tissues and ligamentous structures in relation to the surgery of the female pelvic viscera. Surg Gynecol Obstet 70: 643–656

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hockel M, Konerding MA, Heubel CP (1998) Liposuction-assisted nerve-sparing extended radical hysterectomy: oncologic rationale, surgical anatomy, and feasibility study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 178: 971–976

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kamina P, Chansigaud JP (1988) Soutènement et suspension des viscères pelviens chez la femme. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod 17: 835–848

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lin HH, Sheu BC, Lo MC, Huang SC (1998) Abnormal urodynamic findings after radical hysterectomy or pelvic irradiation for cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Obstet 63: 169–174

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Magrina JF, Goodrich M, Weaver AL, Podratz KC (1995) Modified radical hysterectomy: morbidity and mortality. Gynecol Oncol 59: 277–282

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Mundy AR (1982) An anatomical explanation for bladder dysfunction following rectal and uterine surgery. Br J Urol 54: 501–504

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Piver S, Rutledge F, Smith JP (1974) Five classes of extended radical hysterectomy for women with cervical cancer. Obstet Gynecol 44: 265-272

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Possover M, Stober S, Plaul K, Schneider A (2000) Identification and preservation of the motor innervation of the bladder in radical hysterectomy type III. Gynecol Oncol 79: 154–157

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ralph G, Winter R, Michelitsch L (1991) Radicality of parametrial resection and dysfunction of the lower urinary tract after radical hysterectomy. Eur J Gynecol Oncol 12: 27–30

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Reiffenstuhl G (1964) The lymphatics of the female genital organs, JB Lippincott, Philadelphia, pp 139–142

  14. Richter K, Frick H (1985) Die Anatomie der Fascia pelvis visceralis aus didaktischer Sicht. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 45: 281–285

    Google Scholar 

  15. Roberts WH, Habenicht J, Krishingner G (1964) The pelvic and perineal fasciae and their neural and vascular relationships. Anat Rec 149: 707–720

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Sakamoto S, Takizawa K (1988) An improved radical hysterectomy with fewer urological complications and with no loss of therapeutic results for invasive cervical cancer. Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynecol 2: 953–958

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Sato K, Sato T (1991) The vascular and neuronal composition of the lateral ligament of the rectum and the rectosacral fascia. Surg Radiol Anat 13: 17–22

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Trimbos JB, Maas CP, Deruiter MC, Peters AA, Kenter GG (2001) A nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: guidelines and feasibility in Western patients. Int J Gynecol Cancer 11: 180–186

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Uhlenhuth E, Day EC, Smith RD, Middleton EB (1948) The visceral endopelvic fascia and the hypogastric sheath. Surg Gynecol Obstet 86: 9-28

    Google Scholar 

  20. Yabuki Y, Asamoto A, Hoshiba T (1991) Dissection of the cardinal ligament in radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer with emphasis on the lateral ligament. Am J Obstet Gynecol 164: 7-14

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Yabuki Y, Asamoto A, Hoshiba T, Nishimoto H, Nishikawa Y, Nakajima T (2000) Radical hysterectomy: an anatomic evaluation of parametrial dissection. Gynecol Oncol 77: 155–163

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Mr. A.G. Bigioni for the illustrations and to Mme. Y. Tiburzi for technical help.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Scambia.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ercoli, A., Delmas, V., Gadonneix, P. et al. Classical and nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: an evaluation of the risk of injury to the autonomous pelvic nerves. Surg Radiol Anat 25, 200–206 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-003-0137-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-003-0137-7

Keywords

Navigation