Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Hepatic chemoembolization: Effect of intraarterial lidocaine on pain and postprocedure recovery

  • Clinical Investigations
  • Published:
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose: To determine if intraarterial lidocaine reduces pain during and after chemoembolization, and whether it influences postprocedure recovery.

Methods: Two patient cohorts undergoing selective hepatic chemoembolization were compared. Chemoembolization was performed without lidocaine (control group) in 27 patients and intraarterial lidocaine was used (lidocaine group) in 29 similar patients. Objective changes in patient management were assessed. Pain reduction in 31 more procedures with lidocaine (total 60) was assessed and related to tumor type.

Results: During chemoembolization, intraarterial lidocaine reduced the need for additional intravenous analgesics from 69% to 19%. After chemoembolization the mean Dilaudid dose in the first 24 hr was reduced from 9.5 mg to 4.15 mg; accordingly, the mean length of hospital stay was reduced from 67.5 to 53.5 hr. During the day of chemoembolization, the mean oral fluid intake increased from 420 ml (control group) to 487 ml (lidocaine group); the percentage of patients taking solid food on the day of chemoembolization increased from 3% to 43%.

Conclusion: Intraarterial lidocaine during chemoembolization reduces the severity and duration of pain after chemoembolization resulting in faster recovery thus reducing the length of hospitalization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pentecost MJ (1993) Transcatheter treatment of hepatic metastases. AJR 160:1171–1175

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Miller DL (1996) First, do no harm. Radiology 198:10–12

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Groupe d’Etude et de Traitement du Carcinome Hepatocellulaire (1995) A comparison of lipiodol chemoembolization and conservative treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. N Engl J Med 332:1256–1261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bismuth H, Morino M, Sherlock D, Castaing D, Miglietta C, Cauquil P, Roche A (1992) Primary treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma by arterial chemoembolization. Am J Surg 163:387–394

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hajarizadeh H, Ivancev K, Mueller CR, Fletcher WS, Woltering E (1992) Effective palliative treatment of metastatic carcinoid tumors with intra-arterial chemotherapy/chemoembolization combined with octreotide acetate. Am J Surg 163:479–483

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Nakamura H, Mitani T, Murakami T, Hashimoto T, Tsuda K, Nakanishi K, Ishida T, Tomoda K, Hori S, Kozuka T (1994) Five-year survival after transcatheter chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 33:S89-S92

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Clouse ME, Stokes KR, Kruskal JB, Perry LJ, Stuart KE, Nasser IA (1993) Chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma: Epinephrine followed by a doxorubicin-ethiodized oil emulsion and gelatin sponge powder. J Vase Interv Radiol 4:717–725

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Daniels J, Pentecost M, Teitelbaum G, Stanley P (1992) Hepatic artery chemoembolization for carcinoma of colon using angiostat collagen and cisplatin, mitomycin and doxorubicin: Response, survival and serum drug levels. Proc Ann Meet Am Soc Clin Oncol 11:A497

    Google Scholar 

  9. Perry LJ, Stuart K, Stokes KR, Clouse ME (1994) Hepatic arterial chemoembolization for metastatic neuroendocrine tumors. Surgery 116:1111–1117

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Gates J, Hartneil GG, Stuart K, Clouse ME (1999) Chemoembolization of hepatic neoplasms: Safety, complications and when to worry. Radiographics 19:399–414

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Farinati F, De Maria N, Marafin C, Herszenyi L, Del Prato S, Rinaldi M, Perini L, Cardin R, Naccarato R (1996) Unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhosis: Survival, prognostic factors, and unexpected side effects after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization. Dig Dis Sei 41:2332–2339

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Berger DH, Carrasco CH, Hohn DC, Curley SA (1995) Hepatic artery chemoembolization or embolization for primary and metastatic liver tumors: Post-treatment management and complications. J Surg Oncol 60:116–121

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kolmannskog F, Kolbenstvedt AN, Schrumpf E, Hanssen LE (1991) Side effects and complications after hepatic artery embolization in the carcinoid syndrome. Scand J Gastroenterol 26:557–562

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Molgaard CP, Teitelbaum GP, Pentecost M, Finck EJ, Davis SH, Dziubinski JE, Daniels JR (1990) Intraarterial administration of lido-caine for analgesia in hepatic chemoembolization. J Vase Interv Radiol 1:81–85

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Essentials of ACLS (1994) In: Cummins RO (ed) Advanced Cardiac Life Support. American Heart Association, pp 1–18

  16. Novak D (1990) Complications of arterial embolization. In: Dondelinger RF (ed) Interventional Radiology, Thieme, Stuttgart, pp 314–324

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hartnell, G.G., Gates, J., Stuart, K. et al. Hepatic chemoembolization: Effect of intraarterial lidocaine on pain and postprocedure recovery. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 22, 293–297 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/s002709900391

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s002709900391

Key words

Navigation