Skip to main content
Log in

Drug-Loaded Microspheres for the Treatment of Liver Cancer: Review of Current Results

  • Review/State of the Art
  • Published:
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) involves the emulsification of a chemotherapeutic agent in a viscous drug carrier, delivered intra-arterially to liver tumor for maximum effect. TACE reduces arterial inflow, diminishes washout of the chemotherapeutic agent, and decreases systemic exposure. Despite evidence of some clinical success with TACE, a new type of microspheres with drug-eluting capabilities may offer a precisely controlled and sustainable release of the chemotherapeutic agent into the tumor bed. In animal trials tumor necrosis (approaching 100%) was greatest at 7 days, with significantly lower plasma concentrations of doxorubicin than in control animals treated with doxorubicin intra-arterially. Clinically, drug-eluting microspheres loaded with doxorubicin, either at 75 mg/m2 or at a fixed dose of 150 mg, were used recently and no severe disorders of the hepatic function were observed postprocedure, while a substantial reduction of the fetoprotein levels occurred. An interim analysis of the first 15 patients from the Hong Kong group at 3 months showed an objective response rate of 61.54% and 53.84% according to EASL criteria and RECIST criteria, respectively, and a survival rate of 93.3%. In this paper we present how to use microspheres loaded with doxorubicin and review their clinical value and preliminary performance for treatment of unresectable liver cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aliberti C, Tilli M, Benea G, Fiorentini G (2006) Trans–arterial chemoembolization (tace) of liver metastases from colorectal cancer using irinotecan-eluting beads: preliminary results. Anticancer Res 26:3793–3795

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Andresen TL, Jensen SS, Jorgensen K (2005) Advanced strategies in liposomal cancer therapy: problems and prospects of active and tumor specific drug release. Prog Lipid Res 44:68–97

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Brown KT (2004) Fatal pulmonary complications after arterial embolization with 40–120-μm tris-acryl gelatin microspheres. J Vasc Interv Radiol 15:197–200

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Brown KT, Nevins AB, Getrajdman GI, Brody LA, Kurtz RC, Fong Y, Blumgart LH (1998) Particle embolization for hepatocellular carcinoma. J Vasc Interv Radiol 9:822–828

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bruix J, Llovet JM (2002) Prognostic assessment and evaluation of the benefits of treatment. J Clin Gastroenterol 35:S138–S142

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bruix J, Sherman M, Llovet JM, Beaugrand M, Lencioni R, Burroughs AK, Christensen E, Pagliaro L, Colombo M, Rodes J (2001) Clinical management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Conclusions of the Barcelona-2000 EASL conference. European Association for the Study of the Liver. J Hepatol 35:421–430

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Chung JW, Park JH, Han JK, Choi BI, Han MC, Lee HS, Kim CY (1996) Hepatic tumors: predisposing factors for complications of transcatheter oily chemoembolization. Radiology 198:33–40

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Covey AM, Maluccio MA, Schubert J, BenPorat L, Brody LA, Sofocleous CT, Getrajdman GI, Fong Y, Brown KT (2006) Particle embolization of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after hepatectomy. Cancer 106:2181–2189

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. de Baere T, Teriitehau C, Deschamps F, Cazejust J, Abdel Rehim M, Hechelhammer L (2006) Transarterial chemoembolization of patients with neuroendocrine hepatic metastases using drug eluting beads. Eur Radiol 16:C84

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dumortier J, Chapuis F, Borson O, Davril B, Scoazec JY, Poncet G, Henry L, Boillot O, Mion F, Berger F, Partensky C, Paliard P, Valette PJ (2006) Unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: survival and prognostic factors after lipiodol chemoembolisation in 89 patients. Dig Liver Dis 38:125–133

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Gabizon A, Catane R, Uziely B, Kaufman B, Safra T, Cohen R, Martin F, Huang A, Barenholz Y (1994) Prolonged circulation time and enhanced accumulation in malignant exudates of doxorubicin encapsulated in polyethylene-glycol coated liposomes. Cancer Res 54:987–992

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Gabizon AA (1994) Liposomal anthracyclines. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 8:431–450

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Gao J, Qian F, Szymanski-Exner A, Stowe N, Haaga J (2002) In vivo drug distribution dynamics in thermoablated and normal rabbit livers from biodegradable polymers. J Biomed Mater Res 62:308–314

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Garnick MB, Ensminger WD, Israel M (1979) A clinical-pharmacological evaluation of hepatic arterial infusion of adriamycin. Cancer Res 39:4105–4110

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hong K, Georgiades CS, Geschwind JF (2006) Technology insight: Image-guided therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma—intra-arterial and ablative techniques. Nat Clin Pract Oncol 3:315–324

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hong K, Khwaja A, Liapi E, Torbenson MS, Georgiades CS, Geschwind JF (2006) New intra-arterial drug delivery system for the treatment of liver cancer: preclinical assessment in a rabbit model of liver cancer. Clin Cancer Res 12:2563–2567

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Johnson PJ, Kalayci C, Dobbs N, Raby N, Metivier EM, Summers L, Harper P, Williams R (1991) Pharmacokinetics and toxicity of intraarterial adriamycin for hepatocellular carcinoma: effect of coadministration of lipiodol. J Hepatol 13:120–127

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Lefrak EA, Pitha J, Rosenheim S, Gottlieb JA (1973) A clinicopathologic analysis of adriamycin cardiotoxicity. Cancer 32:302–314

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Lewis AL, Gonzalez MV, Lloyd AW, Hall B, Tang Y, Willis SL, Leppard SW, Wolfenden LC, Palmer RR, Stratford PW (2006) DC bead: in vitro characterization of a drug-delivery device for transarterial chemoembolization. J Vasc Interv Radiol 17:335–342

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lewis AL, Taylor RR, Hall B, Gonzalez MV, Willis SL, Stratford PW (2006) Pharmacokinetic and safety study of doxorubicin-eluting beads in a porcine model of hepatic arterial embolization. J Vasc Interv Radiol 17:1335–1343

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Llovet JM, Real MI, Montana X, Planas R, Coll S, Aponte J, Ayuso C, Sala M, Muchart J, Sola R, Rodes J, Bruix J (2002) Arterial embolisation or chemoembolisation versus symptomatic treatment in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 359:1734–1739

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lo CM, Ngan H, Tso WK, Liu CL, Lam CM, Poon RT, Fan ST, Wong J (2002) Randomized controlled trial of transarterial lipiodol chemoembolization for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 35:1164–1171

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Lopez RR Jr., Pan SH, Hoffman AL, Ramirez C, Rojter SE, Ramos H, McMonigle M, Lois J (2002) Comparison of transarterial chemoembolization in patients with unresectable, diffuse vs focal hepatocellular carcinoma. Arch Surg 137:653–657, discussion 657–658

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Malagari K, Chatzimichail K, Alexopoulou E, Economou GP, Letsou DI, Vergadis V, Loggitsi D, Kelekis DA, Gouliamos A (2006) Hehepatocellular carcinoma chemoembolization with DC beads. Eur Radiol 16:C24

    Google Scholar 

  25. Muller HJ, Port RE, Grubert M, Hilger RA, Scheulen M, Mross K (2003) The influence of liver metastases on the pharmacokinetics of doxorubicin—a population-based pharmacokinetic project of the CESAR-APOH. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther 41:598–599

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Osuga K, Murakami T, Nakamura H, Hori S (2001) [A new embolic material: Sap-microsphere]. Nippon Rinsho 59(Suppl 6):534–538

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Padhani AR, Ollivier L (2001) The recist (response evaluation criteria in solid tumors) criteria: implications for diagnostic radiologists. Br J Radiol 74:983–986

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Pelage JP, Walker WJ, Dref OL (2002) Uterine necrosis after uterine artery embolization for leiomyoma. Obstet Gynecol 99:676–677, author reply 677

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Rand T, Loewe C, Schoder M, Schmook MT, Peck-Radosavljevic M, Kettenbach J, Wolf F, Schneider B, Lammer J (2005) Arterial embolization of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma with use of microspheres, lipiodol, and cyanoacrylate. CardioVasc Interv Radiol 28:313–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Siegal T, Horowitz A, Gabizon A (1995) Doxorubicin encapsulated in sterically stabilized liposomes for the treatment of a brain tumor model: biodistribution and therapeutic efficacy. J Neurosurg 83:1029–1037

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Sigurdson ER, Ridge JA, Daly JM (1986) Intra-arterial infusion of doxorubicin with degradable starch microspheres. Improvement of hepatic tumor drug uptake. Arch Surg 121:1277–1281

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Stadler A, Lomoschitz FM, Schernthaner RE, Kettenbach J, Katzler I, Lammer J (2006) Chemoembolization of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma with doxorubicin loaded microspheres: a pilot study. In: Radiological Society of North America: Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting Program, p 252

  33. Tancredi T, McCuskey PA, Kan Z, Wallace S (1999) Changes in rat liver microcirculation after experimental hepatic arterial embolization: comparison of different embolic agents. Radiology 211:177–181

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Taylor RR, Tang Y, Gonzalez MV, Stratford PW, Lewis AL (2007) Irinotecan drug eluting beads for use in chemoembolization: in vitro and in vivo evaluation of drug release properties. Eur J Pharm Sci 30:7–14

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA, Wanders J, Kaplan RS, Rubinstein L, Verweij J, Van Glabbeke M, van Oosterom AT, Christian MC, Gwyther SG (2000) New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst 92:205–216

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Varela M, Real MI, Brunet M, et al. (2005) Chemoembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma with drug eluting beads reduces the systemic availability of doxorubicin. A pharmacokinetic assessment. Presented at AASLD, San Francisco, CA, November 11–15, abstract P485

Download references

Acknowledgments

Substantial support was provided by preliminary data obtained from R.T. Poon, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China, in vitro characterization of DC beads published by Lewis et al., and the preclinical assessment in a rabbit model published by K. Hong et al.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joachim Kettenbach.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kettenbach, J., Stadler, A., Katzler, I.v. et al. Drug-Loaded Microspheres for the Treatment of Liver Cancer: Review of Current Results. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 31, 468–476 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-007-9280-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-007-9280-6

Keywords

Navigation