Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Diffusion-weighted MRI: a useful technique to discriminate benign versus malignant ovarian surface epithelial tumors with solid and cystic components

  • Published:
Abdominal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate differences in apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values for the solid component of benign and malignant ovarian surface epithelial tumors with the goal of differentiating benign versus malignant ovarian tumors preoperatively.

Materials and methods

A total of 127 patients with 131 pelvic masses identified by ultrasound between January 2006 and January 2011 were enrolled in this study. 46 patients were diagnosed with benign tumors, and 85 patients were diagnosed with malignant pathologies. For all of the patients, routine spin-echo MRI and diffusion-weighted imaging were performed. ADC values were determined for all of the masses, and the mean ADC values for the benign and malignant tumors were analyzed using Student’s t test. A P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Mean ADC values associated with malignant ovarian surface epithelial tumors were significantly lower than the mean ADC values of the benign tumors. In addition, the range of ADC values associated with a 95% confidence interval did not overlap between the two groups. ROC analysis indicated that a cutoff ADC value of 1.25 × 10−3 mm2/s was associated with 90.1% sensitivity and 89.9% specificity.

Conclusion

ADC values determined from 1.5 T MR DWI of benign and malignant ovarian masses were found to be significantly different.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sutton CL, McKinney CD, Jones JE, Gay SB (1992) Ovarian masses revisited: radiologic and pathologic correlation. Radiographics 12:853–877

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bazot M, Darai E, Nassar-Slaba J, Lafont C, Thomassin-Naggara I (2008) Value of magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of ovarian tumors: a review. J Comput Assist Tomogr 32:712–723

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sohaib SAA, Sahdev A, Trappen PV, Jacobs IJ, Reznek RH (2003) Characterization of adnexal mass lesions on MR imaging. AJR 180:1297–1304

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ghossain MA, Buy JN, Ligneres C, et al. (1991) Epithelial tumors of the ovary: comparison of MR and CT findings. Radiology 181:863–870

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Jung SE, Lee JM, Rha SE, et al. (2002) CT and MR imaging of ovarian tumors with emphasis on differential diagnosis. Radiographics 22:1305–1325

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Katayama M, Masui T, Kobayashi S, et al. (2002) Diffusion-weighted echo planar imaging of ovarian tumors: is it useful to measure apparent diffusion coefficients? J Comput Assist Tomogr 26:250–256

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Timmerman D, Valentin L, Bourne TH, et al. (2000) Terms, definitions and measurements to describe the sonographic features of adenexal tumors: a consensus opinion from the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis(IOTA) Group. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 16:500–505

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Thomassin-Naggara I, Darai E, Cuenod CA, et al. (2008) Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: a useful tool for characterizing ovarian epithelial tumors. J Magn Reson Imag 28:111–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Moteki T, Ishizaka H (1998) Evaluation of cystic ovarian lesions using apparent diffusion coefficient from turboFLASH MR images. Br J Radiol 71:612–620

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kim KA, Park CM, Lee JH, et al. (2004) Benign ovarian tumors with solid and cystic components that mimic malignancy. AJR 182:1259–1265

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Thomassin-Naggara I, Darai E, Cuenod CA, et al. (2009) Contribution of diffusion-weighted MR imaging for predicting benignity of complex adnexal masses. Eur Radiol 19:1544–1552

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bazot M, Nassar-Slaba J, Thomassin-Naggara I, et al. (2006) MR imaging compared with intraoperative frozen-section examination for diagnosis of adnexal tumors; correlation with final histology. Eur Radiol 16:2687–2699

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Umemoto M, Shiota M, Shimono T, et al. (2006) Preoperative diagnosis of ovarian tumors, focusing on the solid area based on diagnostic imaging. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 32:195–201

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Thomassin-Naggara I, Toussaint I, Perrot N, et al. (2011) Characterization of complex adnexal masses: value of adding perfusion-and diffusion-weighted MR imaging to conventional MR imaging. Radiology 258:793–803

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Erturk SM, Ichikawa T, Sano K, et al. (2008) Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for characterization of focal liver masses: impact of parallel imaging (SENSE) and b value. J Comput Assist Tomogr 32:865–871

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Nakai G, Matsuki M, Inada Y, et al. (2008) Detection and evaluation of pelvic lymph nodes in patients with gynecologic malignancies using body diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr 32:764–768

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wenhua Li.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Li, W., Chu, C., Cui, Y. et al. Diffusion-weighted MRI: a useful technique to discriminate benign versus malignant ovarian surface epithelial tumors with solid and cystic components. Abdom Radiol 37, 897–903 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-011-9814-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-011-9814-x

Keywords

Navigation