Skip to main content
Log in

Serum pepsinogens as a screening test of extensive chronic gastritis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Gastroenterologia Japonica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The serum level of pepsinogen I (PG I) and pepsinogen II (PG II), and the PG I/PG II ratio were compared with the surface area of the fundic mucosa, as determined endoscopically by the Congo red staining method. Reduction in the area of the fundic mucosa due to gastritis was associated with stepwise reduction in the PG I levels and the PG I/PG II ratios. Reduction in the area of the fundic mucosa was also associated with decreases in the basal acid output, maximal acid output (MAO), the basal pepsin output and the stimulated pepsin output. The best sensitivity and specificity levels for the diagnosis of normal mucosa and severe gastritis were obtained with the PG I/PG II ratio and the MAO. A retrospective study of 58 patients with gastric cancer and 162 cancer-free patients showed that a PG I/PG II ratio identified 86.2% of all carcinomas and 87.5% of early carcinomas. Although this test gave a positive rate of 36% among the cancer-susceptible age group controls, its use would lower the cost of mass screening by targeting a smaller test population.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Segi M, et al: World cancer mortality. Gann Monogr Cancer Res 1981, 26: 121–274

    Google Scholar 

  2. Correa P, et al: Gastric cancer in Colombia. III. Natural histry of precursor lesions. J Natl Cancer Inst 1976, 57: 1027–1035

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kawachi T, et al: Precancerous changes in the stomach. Cancer Res 1976, 36: 2673–2677

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bock OAA, et al: The serum pepsinogen level with special reference to the histology of the gastric mucosa. Gut 1953, 4: 106–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hirschowitz BI: Pepsinogen: its origin, secretion and excretion. Physiol Rev 1957, 37: 475–511

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Mirsky IA, et al: Blood plasma pepsinogen. II. The activity of plasma from normal subjects, patients with duodenal ulcer and patients with pernicious anemia. J Lab Clin Med 1952, 40: 188–199

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Samloff IM, et al: A study of the relationship between serum group I pepsinogen levels and gastric acid secretion. Gastroenterology 1975, 69: 1196–2000

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Varis K, et al: An appraisal of tests for severe atrophic gastritis in relatives of patients with pernicious anemia. Dig Dis Sci 1979, 24: 187–191

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Samloff IM: Pepsinogens I and II: Purification from gastric mucosa and radioimmunoassay in serum. Gastroenterology 1982, 82: 26–33

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Samloff IM, et al: Relationships among serum pepsinogen I, serum pepsinogen II, and gastric mucosal histology. A study in relatives of patients with pernicious anemia. Gastroenterology 1982, 83: 204–209

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Okuda S, et al: An endoscopic method to investigate the gastric acid secretion in “Proc 1st Congr Int Soc Endoscopy”, Hitachi Printing Co, Tokyo, 1966; 221–226

    Google Scholar 

  12. Tatsuta M, et al: Studies on gastritis in the upper portion of stomach by endoscopic Congo red test. Endoscopy 1973, 5: 61–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ichinose M, et al: Radioimmunoassay of Group II pepsinogen in human serum. Clin Chimica Acta 1982, 122: 61–69

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ichinose M, et al: Radioimmunoassay of serum group I and group II pspsinogens in normal controls and in patients with various disorders. Clin Chimica Acta 1982, 126: 183–191

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Mild K, et al: Serum pepsinogens in peptic ulcer and gastric cancer, in “Proc Int Workshop Aspartic Proteinases”, Tokyo, 1985; 17

  16. Miki K, et al: Upper gastrointestinal mass survey with panendoscopy in a workplace. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 1982, 28: 70–72

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Anson ML: The estimation of pepsin, trypsin, papain and cathepsin with hemoglobin. J Gen Physiol 1939, 22: 79–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Feinstein AR: On the sensitivity, specificity and discrimination of diagnostic tests, in “Clinical biostatistics”, Mosby CV, St Louis, 1977; 214–226

  19. Kimura K: Chronological transition of the fundicpyloric border determined by stepwise biopsy of the lesser and greater curvatures of the stomach. Gastroenterology 1972, 63: 584–592

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Samloff IM: Immunologic studies of human group I pepsinogens. J Immunol 1971, 106: 962–968

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kubo T, et al: Intestinal metaplasia of gastric mucosa in autopsy materials in Hiroshima and Yamaguchi districts. Gann 1971, 62: 49–53

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Stemmermann GN, et al: Intestinal metaplasia of the stomach in Hawaii and Japan. A study of its relation to serum pepsinogen I, gastrin and parietal cell antibodies. Am J Dis 1978, 23: 815–820

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Stemmermann GN, et al: Serum pepsinogen I and gastrin in relation to extent and location of intestinal metaplasia in the surgically resected stomach. Dig Dis Sci 1980, 25: 680–687

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Nomura AMY, et al: Serum pepsinogen I as a predictor of stomach cancer. Ann Int Med 1980, 93: 537–540

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Miki, K., Ichinose, M., Shimizu, A. et al. Serum pepsinogens as a screening test of extensive chronic gastritis. Gastroenterol Jpn 22, 133–141 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02774209

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02774209

Key Words

Navigation