Skip to main content
Log in

A comparison of the sensitivity and specificity of calcaneal ultrasound measurements with clinical criteria for bone densitometry (DEXA) referral

  • Published:
Clinical Rheumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Advisory Group on Osteoporosis, Department of Health, 1994.

  2. Young H, Howey S, Purdie DW. Broadband Ultrasound Attenuation compared with Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry in Screening for Postmenopausal Low Bone Density. Osteoporosis Int 1993; 3: 160–164.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Marshall D, Johnell O, Wedel H. Meta-analysis of how well measures of bone mineral density predict occurrence of osteoporotic fractures. BMJ 1996; 312: 1254–59.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Martin JC, Reid DM. Appendicular measurements in screening women for low axial bone mineral density. Br J Radiol 1996; 69: 234–240.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Massie A, Reid DM, Porter RW. Screening for osteoporosis; Comparison between Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry and Broadband Ultrasound Attenuation in 1000 perimenopausal women. Osteo Int 1993; 3: 107–11.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Langton, C.M., Ballard, P., Bennett, D. et al. A comparison of the sensitivity and specificity of calcaneal ultrasound measurements with clinical criteria for bone densitometry (DEXA) referral. Clin Rheumatol 16, 117–118 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02238781

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02238781

Keywords

Navigation