Elsevier

Annals of Vascular Surgery

Volume 10, Issue 5, September 1996, Pages 464-468
Annals of Vascular Surgery

Preoperative Embolization of Carotid Body Tumors: When Is It Appropriate?

https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02000594Get rights and content

To determine when to use preoperative embolization, we retrospectively reviewed a consecutive series of concurrently treated patients who underwent carotid body tumor resection between 1984 and 1994. Eleven nonembolized tumors (N-EMB group) and 11 embolized tumors (EMB group) were resected. The two groups were similar with respect to demographics and presentation, with the exception that more patients in the EMB group complained of painful neck masses. There was no significant difference in the pretreatment size of the neck mass between the two groups (N-EMB = 4.3 ± 1.5 cm; N-EMB = 5.1 ± 2.1 cm). Zero to 6 days after embolization, surgical resection was performed. There was no difference in the distribution of tumors, which were grouped according to Shamblin's classification, between the N-EMB and EMB patients. Two patients in each group required resection of the internal carotid artery, whereas a total of seven cranial nerves were resected. There were no differences in blood loss, number of blood transfusions, operative time, or perioperative morbidity between the N-EMB and EMB groups. Ten patients had new cranial nerve deficits and four of these patients required treatment for tenth nerve paralysis. Overall the total hospital stay was similar in the two groups, but the EMB group had a significantly longer preoperative stay compared to the N-EMB group (1.5 ± 0.8 vs. 0.8 ± 0.4 days; p = 0.02). These data show that preoperative embolization does not significantly improve outcome in patients undergoing resection of carotid body tumors measuring 4 to 5 cm. Therefore, in this era of cost-containment, preoperative embolization should not be used in the treatment of midsized carotid body tumors.

References (14)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (131)

  • Risk Factors for Stroke After Carotid Paraganglioma Surgery

    2023, Annals of Vascular Surgery
    Citation Excerpt :

    Several factors have been associated with the risk of stroke, such as patients with Shamblin II or III type tumors, tumor size, vascular injuries, and carotid resection and repair.2,12,33 Other authors have raised concern for an increased stroke rate in patients undergoing preoperative embolization due to the potential accidental reflux of particulate matter into the cerebral circulation.30,34–36 However, several studies contradict this statement and report nondifferences in stroke rate between embolized and nonembolized patients.23,37–39

View all citing articles on Scopus

Presented at the Fifth Annual Winter Meeting of the Peripheral Vascular Surgery Society, Breckenridge, Colo., January 29, 1995.

Reprint requests: Tammy K. Ramos, MD, Assistant Professor of Surgery, Department of Surgery, UCSF/Mount Zion Medical Center, 1600 Divisadero St., C322E, San Francisco, CA 94115.

View full text