A Combined Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic (PK–PD) Model for Tumor Growth in the Rat with UFT Administration☆
Introduction
Drug development is an expensive, time-consuming process. According to Adams et al., drug development cost ranges from $500 million to $2000 million per new drug, depending on the therapy and the developing firm.1 Even after the development and approval of drug to the market, the optimal dosing schedule and regimen remain uncertain. For example, the chemotherapeutic drug 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) was developed several decades ago and has been widely used, but the optimal method of using this drug is still under debate.2., 3. Finding an optimal dosing strategy is a difficult, expensive task that involves a large number of patients and a long period of time, especially for oncology drugs. In addition, the inherent metabolic and physiologic variations in patients result in patients responding differently to the same dosing regimen.4 Pharmacogenetics, which studies the effect of genetic variations on responses of patients to drugs and attempts to tailor the dosing strategy for each individual patient, attempts to address this issue.5., 6. Considering this individual genetic variation further complicates the problem of dose optimization because it is virtually impossible to perform such a large number of tests on each individual.
A mathematical approach such as a pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic (PK–PD) model is a feasible alternative as it can link the administration regimen to patient response in terms of tumor growth.7 A physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model can be used to obtain the concentration profiles of a drug in different organs after drug administration, and a pharmacodynamic (PD) model can be used to model the pharmacological effect of the drug, for instance, the response of tumor to oncology drugs. Such an integrative mathematical model can help researchers to predict possible outcomes of various drug candidates, and the benefits of the integrative PBPK–PD model are well recognized.8., 9., 10., 11., 12., 13. The integrative mathematical models can be used to test the effect of individual variation in pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic factors, such as clearance rate and tumor response.
In this article, a PBPK model is developed to describe the concentration profiles of a chemotherapeutic drug administered in a rat, and a PD model is developed to describe the tumor growth kinetics in the presence of the drug. The PBPK model and the PD model are then combined together to predict the growth of tumor in a rat. The combined PK–PD model is used to find the optimal combination ratio of the drugs, and to test the effect of variation in the metabolizing enzyme level. Also a new dosing strategy to maximize the drug efficacy is tested. Such a model should be an effective guide towards rapid evaluation of treatment strategies and can be a useful tool for patient specific chemotherapy if levels of key enzymes in an individual are known.
Section snippets
Experimental Background for Model Development
Colorectal cancer ranks second as a cause of cancer related deaths.14 Since the discovery by Heidelberger et al.,15 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) has been the most widely accepted chemotherapeutic agent for colorectal cancer. 5-FU was developed based on the study conducted by Rutman et al.16 that rat hepatomas used the pyrimidine uracil more rapidly than other normal tissues, implying that uracil metabolism can be a target for chemotherapeutic agents.17 5-FU can be classified as an antimetabolite drug
Model Structure
The scheme of the PBPK model is presented in Figure 2. The model consists of seven compartments, which are the blood, gut, liver, tumor, fat, well perfused organs, and poorly perfused organs. The overall model consists of three parallel submodels for Tegafur, 5-FU and uracil, where the models for Tegafur and 5-FU are connected by the transformation of Tegafur to 5-FU. All seven compartments are assumed to be homogeneously well-mixed and equilibrated with exiting blood. The only exception is the
Construction of PK–PD Model
The results of simulation after parameter fitting for the PBPK model are shown in Figure 4, Figure 5. The experimental results shown in the figures for comparison were taken from Kawaguchi et al.41 In general, the PBPK model made a reasonably good fit to the experimental data in all organs. The model was able to make accurate predictions for Tegafur concentration profiles in all organs. It should be noted that the result shown in Figure 5b was not used for curve fitting. We used this
Construction of PBPK Model and PD Model
The PBPK model was fitted to the concentration profiles of three compounds in four different organs for two different dosing conditions. In total, 24 concentration profiles were used for fitting the PBPK model. Simulation results of the developed PBPK model showed a good fit to the experimental data from literature,41 with exception of 5-FU concentration in the tumor and uracil concentration in the liver. In both cases the observed pharmacokinetics showed a slower clearance than predicted,
Conclusion
We developed a combined PK–PD model that describes the response of tumor in a rat to the administration of UFT. A PBPK model and a PD model were developed separately and fitted to experimental data in literature, and a combined PK–PD model was used to describe tumor progression in a rat. It was shown that this mathematical model can be used to test various dosing strategies and simulate the effects of variations in the enzyme levels. Furthermore, the model was used to optimize the dosage based
Acknowledgments
This work was supported in part by the New York State Science and Technology Foundation through the Cornell Nanobiotechnology Center, an anonymous gift to Cornell Biomedical Engineering, and a grant from Army Corp of Engineers (CERL) W9132T-07. JHS gratefully acknowledges support from Samsung Lee Kun Hee Scholarship Foundation, and also thanks Dr. Jeffrey Varner for helpful discussions on the method of optimization.
References (67)
- et al.
Tailoring chemotherapy in advanced colorectal cancer
Curr Opin Pharmacol
(2003) - et al.
Utility of physiologically based pharmacokinetic models to drug development and rational drug discovery candidate selection
Toxicol Lett
(2003) - et al.
Applications and prospects for physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PB–PK) models involving pharmaceutical agents
Toxicol Lett
(1995) - et al.
The catabolism of uracil in vivo and in vitro
J Biol Chem
(1954) - et al.
Metabolism and mechanism of action of 5-fluorouracil
Pharmacol Ther
(1990) Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase and the efficacy and toxicity of 5-fluorouracil
Eur J Cancer
(2004)- et al.
The contribution of cytochrome P450 to the metabolism of tegafur in human liver
Drug Metab Pharmacokinet
(2003) - et al.
Prediction of pharmacokinetics prior to in vivo studies. 1. Mechanism-based prediction of volume of distribution
J Pharm Sci
(2002) - et al.
Patient preference and pharmacokinetics of oral modulated UFT versus intravenous fluorouracil and leucovorin: A randomised crossover trial in advanced colorectal cancer
Eur J Cancer
(2002) - et al.
Transit compartments versus gamma distribution function to model signal transduction processes in pharmacodynamics
J Pharm Sci
(1998)
Effect of 5-fluorouracil on G1 phase cell cycle regulation in oral cancer cell lines
Oral Oncol
Physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling of disposition of epiroprim in humans
J Pharm Sci
Rat to human extrapolation of HCFC-123 kinetics deduced from halothane kinetics: A corollary approach to physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling
Fundam Appl Toxicol
Estimating the cost of new drug development: Is it really 802 million dollars?
Health Aff (Millwood)
Effects of 5-fluorouracil adjuvant treatment of colon cancer
Expert Rev Anticancer Ther
Chemotherapy for colorectal cancer
Dig Surg
Toward individualized treatment: Prediction of anticancer drug disposition and toxicity with pharmacogenetics
Anticancer Drugs
Pharmacogenetics and cancer therapy
Nat Rev Cancer
Predictive pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic modeling oftumor growth kinetics in xenograft models after administration of anticancer agents
Cancer Res
Recent developments in the clinical pharmacology of classical cytotoxic chemotherapy
Br J Clin Pharmacol
Cancer pharmacotherapy: 21st century ‘magic bullets’ and changing paradigms
Br J Clin Pharmacol
Physiologically based pharmacokinetic modelling: A sound mechanistic basis is needed
Br J Clin Pharmacol
Clinical pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic and physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling in new drug development: the capecitabine experience
Invest New Drugs
Stable disease in advanced colorectal cancer: Therapeutic implications
Anticancer Res
Fluorinated pyrimidines, a new class of tumour-inhibitory compounds
Nature
Review article: Colorectal cancer chemotherapy
Aliment Pharmacol Ther
Dual antitumor effects of 5-fluorouracil on the cell cycle in colorectal carcinoma cells: A novel target mechanism concept for pharmacokinetic modulating chemotherapy
Cancer Res
Improving the anti-tumor activity of 5-fluorouracil by increasing its incorporation into RNA via metabolic modulation
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase activity in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells and liver: Population characteristics, newly identified deficient patients, and clinical implication in 5-fluorouracil chemotherapy
Cancer Res
Clinical pharmacokinetics of 5-fluorouracil and its metabolites in plasma, urine, and bile
Cancer Res
Combination of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase and thymidylate synthase gene expressions in primary tumors as predictive parameters for the efficacy of fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer
Clin Cancer Res
Thymidylate synthase and dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase mRNA expression levels: Predictors for survival in colorectal cancer patients receiving adjuvant 5-fluorouracil
Clin Cancer Res
Molecular basis of the human dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency and 5-fluorouracil toxicity
J Clin Invest
Cited by (0)
- ☆
Additional Supporting Information may be found in the online version of this article.