TY - JOUR T1 - Taxanes and Gemcitabine Doublets in the Management of HER-2 Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer: Towards Optimization of Association and Schedule JF - Anticancer Research JO - Anticancer Res SP - 1245 LP - 1258 VL - 28 IS - 2B AU - GIULIO METRO AU - ALESSANDRA FABI AU - MICHELANGELO RUSSILLO AU - PAOLA PAPALDO AU - MICHELINO DE LAURENTIIS AU - GIANLUIGI FERRETTI AU - DOMENICA PELLEGRINI AU - CARMEN NUZZO AU - VANESSA GRAZIANO AU - PATRIZIA VICI AU - MARIANNA INTRONA AU - ALESSANDRA FELICI AU - FRANCESCO COGNETTI AU - PAOLO CARLINI Y1 - 2008/03/01 UR - http://ar.iiarjournals.org/content/28/2B/1245.abstract N2 - The management of human epidermal receptor-2 (HER-2) negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is usually problematic, since no standard therapy exists in this setting. For some patients, combination chemotherapy represents a valuable approach, although its use is often limited by the risks of increased toxicity as well as impairments in quality of life (QoL) that often outweigh the marginal efficacy benefit. Against this background, the use of taxanes, either paclitaxel or docetaxel, in combination with gemcitabine as first-line treatment of HER-2 negative MBC is supported by the evidence of the single-agent activity of these drugs, beneficial pharmacological interactions, different mechanisms of action and largely non superimposable toxicity profiles. A number of phase II studies have explored the activity of a taxane plus gemcitabine in both chemonaïve and pretreated MBC patients, all showing remarkably high response rates and exceptional tolerability. In randomized phase III trials, the paclitaxel and gemcitabine combination showed significant improvements in objective responses, time to progression and overall survival, as compared to paclitaxel monotherapy, whereas the docetaxel and gemcitabine doublet demonstrated equal efficacy and better tolerability, as compared to docetaxel plus capecitabine. In addition to standard threeweekly dosing regimens, alternative schedules of administration of taxanes and gemcitabine doublets (weekly, twoweekly) might deserve further investigation due to their potential usefulness in reducing pharmacological toxicity while maintaining or increasing dose-intensity and clinical efficacy. Furthermore, uncertainty exists on which taxane should be preferred in combination with gemcitabine, since no head-to-head comparison between paclitaxel-gemcitabine and docetaxel-gemcitabine has been performed so far. Ongoing trials will address these issues and future investigations will also include the evaluation of bevacizumab, the monoclonal antibody targeted against vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), in combination with taxanes and gemcitabine doublets. Copyright© 2008 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. John G. Delinassios), All rights reserved ER -