RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Non-invasive Physical Plasma Modulates Macrophage Polarization: A Potential Strategy for Tumor Microenvironment Remodeling
JF Anticancer Research
JO Anticancer Res
FD International Institute of Anticancer Research
SP 2437
OP 2444
DO 10.21873/anticanres.17050
VO 44
IS 6
A1 NIU, YUEQUN
A1 FÖRSTER, SARAH
A1 BADENDIECK, STEFFEN
A1 NOKHBEHSAIM, MARJAN
A1 ABAZID, ALEXANDER
A1 STOPE, MATTHIAS B.
YR 2024
UL http://ar.iiarjournals.org/content/44/6/2437.abstract
AB Background/Aim: Non-invasive physical plasma (NIPP) has shown promise in the treatment of cancer. However, conflicting results have been reported regarding the effect of NIPP on macrophage polarization. As tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) are essential in the regulation of cancer development, this study aimed to determine the role of NIPP treatment in macrophage polarization and tumor-microenvironment (TME) remodeling. Materials and Methods: A portable NIPP device, Plasma Care (Terraplasma Medical, Garching, Germany), was employed as the source of NIPP. The human monocytic cell line THP-1 was adopted as the cell model for macrophage differentiation and polarization. The effects of NIPP treatment on temperature, pH value, and oxidative stress induction of the culture medium were examined to validate the feasibility of applying the NIPP device in subsequent cell treatment. The changes in morphology, viability, and proliferation of THP-1 cells after NIPP treatment were determined. The expression of M1/M2 macrophage markers was examined by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Results: No significant changes were observed in temperature and pH value after NIPP treatment, while the formation of hydrogen peroxide was promoted in a time-dependent manner. Cell morphology, viability, and proliferation were not affected by up to 6 minutes of NIPP treatment. In monocytes, 6 minutes of NIPP treatment significantly increased the expression of M1 markers (TNF-α and IL-6) and suppressed the M2 marker (CD206), findings which were consistent in the monocyte-derived macrophages. Furthermore, NIPP treatment also significantly promoted M1 polarization in the monocyte-derived macrophages induced by phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate. Conclusion: NIPP is a safe and robust oxidative stress inducer and showed potential in TAM regulation by promoting M1 macrophage polarization.