PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - JAMES DILLEY
AU  - PHILIP PRATT
AU  - MARIA KYRGIOU
AU  - KELSEY FLOTT
AU  - ARA DARZI
AU  - ERIK MAYER
TI  - Current and Future Use of Radiological Images in the Management of Gynecological Malignancies – A Survey of Practice in the UK
AID  - 10.21873/anticanres.12929
DP  - 2018 Oct 01
TA  - Anticancer Research
PG  - 5867--5876
VI  - 38
IP  - 10
4099  - http://ar.iiarjournals.org/content/38/10/5867.short
4100  - http://ar.iiarjournals.org/content/38/10/5867.full
SO  - Anticancer Res2018 Oct 01; 38
AB  - Background/Aim: Radiology provides increasingly accurate and complex information. Understanding the clinicians' interpretation of scans could improve surgical planning, decision-making; informed training and development of augmented imaging. This was a survey exploring the interpretation of imaging by clinicians and its use in operative preparation and prediction. Materials and Methods: The survey was open for two-months and circulated online to British Gynaecological Cancer society members. Results: Seventy-three (19%) members completed the survey. Respondents had a confidence level of 51% in their ability to interpret computed tomography (CT) and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images independently. Preoperative imaging was commonly used to plan operations, predict complications and complete resection. Images were reviewed for primary (96.3%)/interval (92.6%) ovarian debulking, but less so for vulvectomy (45%). Scan (79.6%) and multidisciplinary team meeting (MDT) (66.6%) reports were used more often than scan images (50%) for operative planning. Amount and pattern of disease on scan were the most important factors predicting operating time. Conclusion: Imaging influences the surgeon's planning, however respondents lack confidence. Training of clinicians in radiological interpretation needs to improve. Augmented image interfaces could facilitate this.