TY - JOUR T1 - Impact of Different Treatment Concepts on Regional Failure in Advanced Oropharyngeal Cancer JF - Anticancer Research JO - Anticancer Res SP - 727 LP - 734 VL - 37 IS - 2 AU - STEPHAN HOCH AU - KATHARINA THELEN AU - HILKE VORWERK AU - CHRISTOPH NETZER AU - THOMAS WILHELM AU - THOMAS GÜNZEL AU - AFSHIN TEYMOORTASH Y1 - 2017/02/01 UR - http://ar.iiarjournals.org/content/37/2/727.abstract N2 - Background: The management of patients with advanced oropharyngeal cancer is complex and mostly requires a multidisciplinary treatment approach. In general, organ preservation by primary concurrent radiochemotherapy (RCT), or surgery completed by adjuvant radiotherapy are established treatment strategies for these patients. However, it is unclear if primary treatment has an effect on regional tumor control. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the regional control after different treatment concepts. Patients and Methods: Clinical data, including histological and radiological results, of 82 patients with T2-T3 oropharyngeal cancer and N2 neck were retrospectively analyzed. They underwent either RCT with salvage neck dissection (ND) (n=45), or primary transoral surgery with ND and adjuvant RCT (n=37). In all cases, the primary tumor was successfully treated, without evidence of local failure in the follow-up. Results: Overall, 11 (13.4%) patients developed regional failure during the follow-up. There were no significant differences in frequency of regional failure (p=0.75), distant metastasis (p=0.35) and overall survival (p=0.22) between treatment groups. However, 5-year disease-free survival was significantly worse (39.0% vs. 57.0%) for patients treated by RCT, with more frequent regional failure detected compared to surgically-treated patients in univariate analysis (p=0.04). Conclusion: Treatment concept does not seem to affect regional tumor control in advanced oropharyngeal cancer after successful treatment of the primary tumor. ER -