@article {MARISCOTTI1219, author = {GIOVANNA MARISCOTTI and NEHMAT HOUSSAMI and MANUELA DURANDO and LAURA BERGAMASCO and PIER PAOLO CAMPANINO and CHIARA RUGGIERI and ELISA REGINI and ANDREA LUPARIA and RICCARDO BUSSONE and ANNA SAPINO and PAOLO FONIO and GIOVANNI GANDINI}, title = {Accuracy of Mammography, Digital Breast Tomosynthesis, Ultrasound and MR Imaging in Preoperative Assessment of Breast Cancer}, volume = {34}, number = {3}, pages = {1219--1225}, year = {2014}, publisher = {International Institute of Anticancer Research}, abstract = {Aim: To define the accuracy of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) added to digital mammography (DM) and ultrasound (US) in the preoperative assessment of breast cancer. Patients and Methods: We performed a prospective study of 200 consecutive women with histologically-proven breast cancer using the above imaging techniques. Accuracy measurements were estimated using a lesion-by-lesion analysis for unifocal, multifocal/multicentric, bilateral and all carcinomas. We also calculated sensitivity according to breast density. Results: DBT had higher sensitivity than DM (90.7\% vs. 85.2\%). Combined DM and DBT with US yielded a 97.7\% sensitivity; despite high sensitivity of MRI (98.8\%), the addition of MRI to combined DM with DBT and US did not significantly improve sensitivity. Overall accuracy did not significantly differ between MRI and DM with DBT and US (92.3\% vs. 93.7\%). Breast density affected sensitivity of DM and DBT (statistically significant difference for DM), not MRI. Conclusion: There is little gain in sensitivity and no gain in overall accuracy, by performing MRI for patients who have been evaluated with DM with DBT and US.}, issn = {0250-7005}, URL = {https://ar.iiarjournals.org/content/34/3/1219}, eprint = {https://ar.iiarjournals.org/content/34/3/1219.full.pdf}, journal = {Anticancer Research} }