Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleClinical Studies
Open Access

A Landscape of Immunogenomics Assessments for Endemic Burkitt Lymphoma: Relevance to Outcomes

TAHA I. HUDA, RAHUL JAIN, TUSHAR SINGH and GEORGE BLANCK
Anticancer Research June 2026, 46 (6) 3231-3242; DOI: https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.18193
TAHA I. HUDA
1Internal Medicine Program, HCA Florida Bayonet Point Hospital, Hudson, FL, U.S.A.;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
RAHUL JAIN
2Department of Molecular Medicine, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, U.S.A.;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
TUSHAR SINGH
2Department of Molecular Medicine, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, U.S.A.;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
GEORGE BLANCK
2Department of Molecular Medicine, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, U.S.A.;
3Department of Immunology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, U.S.A.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: gblanck{at}usf.edu
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background/Aim: T-cell receptor recombination sequencing reads have been extracted from genomics files and have been characterized and correlated with patient outcomes for many different cancer types.

Materials and Methods: An immunogenomics approach was applied to endemic Burkitt lymphoma (BL) utilizing the Cancer Genome Characterization Initiative – Burkitt Lymphoma Genome Sequencing Project (CGCI-BLGSP), focusing on TCR V- or J- gene segment, HLA allele combinations and anti-HIV CDR3s.

Results: Results indicated that five TCR V- or J- gene segment, HLA allele combinations were associated with overall survival (OS) distinctions where the individual arms of the combinations were not associated with survival. Anti-HIV analyses indicated that those cases with an anti-HIV TRA CDR3 had a higher OS probability than those without (median OS not reached vs. 215 days; log-rank p=0.0013), and those with anti-HIV TRA and TRB CDR3s had better pathologic staging compared to those without.

Conclusion: T-cell response leads to early control of progression of endemic BL.

Keywords:
  • Burkitt Lymphoma
  • immunogenomics
  • HLA
  • blood sample exomes
  • immune biomarkers

Introduction

Burkitt lymphoma (BL) is an aggressive B-cell lymphoma characterized by a translocation of c-MYC and an immunoglobulin gene. BL cases are divided into three variants: endemic (which occurs in equatorial Africa), immunodeficiency-associated (often in HIV patients and organ transplant recipients), and sporadic. Endemic BL comprises the majority of BL cases, and 30 to 50% of childhood cancers in equatorial Africa are attributed to BL. While there are many BL treatments, management of endemic BL is often hampered due to the resource-poor setting. For example, a 2016 cohort study focusing on Kenyan children found a one-year overall survival (OS) of 59% (1).

Thus, investigations have focused on the adaptive immune system, especially given that the Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is present in all cases of BL. One major conundrum has been, why is BL specifically endemic in sub-Saharan Africa even though EBV is present throughout the world? Thus, recent studies have focused on the role of EBV in tumorigenesis (2, 3), as well as looking at other endemic diseases possibly having a cooperative role in tumorigenesis of BL. Another approach has focused on T-cell roles and functions in BL. BL cells have shown decreased CD4+ T-cell activation as a result of decreased immunogenicity of certain EBV antigens, allowing them to escape HLA class I presentation (4). Other studies have shown that T-cells appear to play a dichotomous role in both allowing for immune evasion while also suppressing pre-BL cells (5). Translation of this knowledge to therapeutics has been attempted with studies focused on CAR-T cell therapy, particularly inspired by the success of CAR-T cell therapy for other hematologic malignancies (6). However, there is a notable gap in the translation of molecular knowledge to novel immunotherapies for BL, as first-line treatment continues to rely largely on cytotoxic agents rather than targeted therapies at this time (7).

In other cancer settings, genomics sequencing data have facilitated the identification of apparently successful adaptive immune responses, i.e., with the recovery of adaptive immune receptor recombination sequencing reads from the genomics files and assessing outcome distinctions associated with such recombination read recoveries. In these studies, the focus has been on identifying immune receptor V-IDs and J-IDs, which yield diverse complementary determining region-3s (CDR3s), to identify patterns related to cancer antigen recognition. For example, this immunogenomics approach has been utilized to identify and characterize patients with immunologically cold cancers, such as MYCN-amplified neuroblastoma which has correspondingly poor outcomes (8).

Further, translational research has been done to identify targetable antigens which could be shared among patients with the same HLA alleles, especially for virus-induced cancers (9). One example is the first engineered peptide-TCR molecule targeting a specific HLA, tebentafusp, approved by the FDA in 2022 (10). Immunogenomics approaches have also been applied to meet the goal of identifying targetable antigens, with studies finding that particular TCR V- and J-gene segment usage, HLA allele combinations are associated with better outcomes in melanoma (11), head and neck cancers (12), and multiple myeloma (13, 14). In addition to human encoded, tumor antigen approaches, other approaches have focused on the adaptive immune response to potential or likely tumor viruses. Detection of TCR CDR3s matching known anti-viral TCR CDR3s have represented outcome differences for ovarian cancer (anti-EBV TCR CDR3s) (15), breast cancer [anti-cytomegalovirus (CMV) TCR CDR3s] (16, 17) and neuroblastoma (anti-CMV TCR CDR3s) (18). Thus, we aimed to characterize the role of T-cells in endemic BL utilizing an immunogenomic approach, focusing on identifying outcome differences in cases with specific V-, J- gene segment, HLA allele combinations; and in cases with TCR CDR3s matching known anti-viral CDR3s.

Materials and Methods

Downloading Burkitt lymphoma RNA-seq files. RNA-seq files provided by the Cancer Genome Characterization Initiative – Burkitt Lymphoma Genome Sequencing Project (CGCI-BLGSP, phs000235), available at the Genomic Data Commons (GDC) website, were used for this study. Specifically, RNA-seq files were downloaded as binary alignment map (BAM) files, utilizing the GDC transfer tool (https://gdc.cancer.gov/access-data/gdc-data-transfer-tool), to a University of South Florida Research Computing cluster. RNA-seq file access was via the authorization of database of genotypes and phenotypes (dbGaP) approved project number, 20312 (with approval granted to Dr. George Blanck). This study represents only endemic BL cases from Uganda (19), which includes 160 RNA-seq files from primary tumor samples, originally from 105 unique cases [supporting online material (SOM), Table S1, GDC download manifest]. Clinical data obtained from the GDC included gender, race, age of diagnosis, days to death, days to last follow-up, vital status, and Ann Arbor pathologic stage (days to death, or when days to death not available, days to last follow up, were used for the KM analyses, below). Ann Arbor pathologic stage is a widely used staging mechanism for lymphomas, where stage I indicates single-region cancer, stage II indicates cancer in two regions, stage III indicates involvement of both sides of the diaphragm, and stage IV indicates diffuse involvement.

Obtaining HLA alleles and T-cell receptor recombination reads. The 160 RNA-seq files used in this study were mined for HLA alleles for the class I genes, HLA-A, -B, -C and for the class II genes, HLA-DPB1, -DQB1, -DRB1, utilizing the xHLA software (20). Twenty-eight samples were noted to represent 13 cases and were utilized to verify replicability for HLA processing, which was found to be consistent at the level of 90% or above for all HLA genes (data not shown). The RNA-seq files were also mined for productive T-cell receptor (TCR) recombination reads for TRA, TRB, TRD, and TRG, yielding the V IDs, the J IDs, and the complementarity determining region-3 (CDR3) amino acid (AA) sequences, as described in (21) (see Table S2 for all TCRs from this study.) This algorithm for mining the TCR recombination sequencing reads from the RNA-seq files first utilizes a low-stringency search sourcing germline 10-mers matching the TCR (e.g., TRA) V- and J-gene sequences. Then, a high-stringency search using a scoring algorithm selects V- and J- reads greater than 19 nucleotides and with greater than 90% nucleotide matches. Of the obtained TCR sequencing recombination reads, only reads with productive TCR CDR3s (i.e., no stop codon or out-of-frame V-J joining segment) were used for this report.

Outcome distinctions based on TCR and HLA features. Initial analyses focused on whether recovering at least one productive CDR3 for each of the TCR genes (TRA, TRB, TRD, or TRG) was associated with OS distinctions. Then, for each TCR, the mean number of productive TCR recoveries among all samples was compared across Ann Arbor pathologic stage utilizing an analysis of variance test (ANOVA). If a case had multiple samples in the ANOVA, the number of recoveries in each sample was averaged for that case. Analyses were then focused on the HLA alleles obtained above. HLA alleles that were associated with distinct clinical features were identified, first by assessing OS probability distinctions using a log-rank test, and then by assessing age of diagnosis distinctions using the Student’s t-test. Subsequently, specific TCR V- or J-gene segment, HLA allele combinations associated with survival distinctions were identified. TCR V- or J- gene segment, HLA allele combinations presented in this report include only those combinations where the sample size was greater than 10; and where the log-rank p-value for the V- or J-gene segment arm and the HLA allele were not statistically, significantly associated with a survival distinction, respectively. Further, only TCR V- or J- gene segment, HLA allele combinations which were supported with a replicative set representing a randomly selected half of the original set were reported in this study. The above analyses were done utilizing the original script freely available at https://github.com/thudausf. The TCR V- or J- gene segment, HLA allele combination outcome analyses were repeated with R “survival” package v3.8.3. Figures for Kaplan-Meier (KM) analyses were produced using R “survminer” package v0.5.0 and the figure for the ANOVA analysis was produced using Graphpad Prism v10.

Anti-human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) TRA and TRB CDR3 analyses. Further analyses focused on identifying whether there were outcome distinctions in endemic BL cases where the mined TRA or TRB CDR3s represented exact AA sequence matches to validated TRA or TRB CDR3s against HIV antigens, published at the VDJdb database (22). Note that in this study, only the HIV-1 strain was utilized for analysis. OS analyses were performed for cases with exact AA sequence matches to anti-HIV TRA or TRB CDR3s versus cases with TRA or TRB recombination reads but without any anti-HIV CDR3 matches, using a log-rank test. Similarly, Ann Arbor pathologic stage was compared for cases with and without an anti-HIV TRA or TRB CDR3 match using a Mann-Whitney U-test. These analyses were done utilizing the original script at https://github.com/thudausf and repeated with IBM Statistical Product and Service Solutions (SPSS) v29. The figures for the Mann-Whitney U analysis were produced using IBM SPSS v29.

Results

Productive TCR recombination reads from RNA-seq files representing endemic BL. TCR recombinations were mined from 160 RNA-seq files representing 105 endemic BL cases. The recovery counts for the sequencing reads representing productive TRA, TRB, TRD, and TRG recombinations are indicated in Table I, grouped by Ann Arbor Pathologic Stage (the percentages of cases represented by at least one recombination sequencing read, for each of TRA, TRB, TRD, and TRG are provided in Table S3). OS probability for cases with and without a particular T-cell receptor was assessed, with results indicating that the 95 endemic BL cases with a TRG recombination read recovery had a higher OS probability as compared to the 10 cases without any TRG recovery (median OS: 387 days vs. 11 days, p=0.0017, Table II, Table S4, Figure 1A). Because some cases were represented by multiple files, this OS test was repeated with the adjustment of removing all cases with duplicate files from the TRG recovery group, thus ensuring that a TRG recovery was not due to having an increased number of samples. This adjusted log-rank test compared 54 cases with TRG with the 10 cases without any TRG recovery and continued to show that cases with a TRG recovery had a higher OS probability (p=0.0097, Table II, Figure 1B). BL pathologic stage was then correlated to the count of TCR recombination reads. TRB and TRG recombination read counts were found to be decreased as the Ann Arbor pathologic stage increased (Table III; TRB and TRG). For example, Stage I BL primary tumor samples had an average of 25.7 TRG recombination reads, whereas Stage IV samples had an average of 11.1 TRG recombination reads (TRG ANOVA p=0.087, post-hoc Stage I vs. Stage IV p=0.054) (Table S5; Figure 2, TRG).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

TCR recombination read recovery counts extracted from 105 CGCI-BLGSP endemic cases.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table II.

Endemic BL cases with a productive TRG recovery had a higher OS probability.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Endemic BL cases with a TRG recombination read recovery have a higher OS probability. (A) Endemic BL cases with a TRG recombination read recovery (n=95, black) had a higher overall survival (OS) probability than those without a TRG recovery (n=10, grey); log-rank p=0.0017. (B) In a modified analysis, endemic BL cases with a TRG recombination (n=54, black) still had a higher OS probability greater than those without a TRG recombination (n=10, grey); log-rank p=0.0097. In this second analysis, unlike in (A) above, no cases that had duplicate samples were included, which reduced the sample size from 95 in (A) to 54 in (B). BL: Burkitt lymphoma; OS: overall survival.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table III.

Mean productive TCR recombination read counts decreased for TRB and TRG across BL Ann Arbor pathologic stage.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Tukey box plot demonstrating a decrease in TRG recombination read count as Ann Arbor pathologic stage progresses in endemic BL; ANOVA p=0.08. Post-hoc analysis identified a significant difference between Stage I recovery counts and Stage IV recovery counts, p=0.054. BL: Burkitt lymphoma.

TCR gene segment usage, HLA allele combinations and outcome distinctions for endemic BL. Using the available samples with HLA allele typing output, two HLA alleles representing OS distinctions, HLA-A*68:02 and HLA-DPB1*04:01, were identified (Table IV, Figure 3A and B). For example, 14 cases with the HLA-A*68:02 allele were compared to 91 remaining cases, whereby the cases with the HLA-A*68:02 allele had a median OS of 165 days compared to 477 days for the remaining cases (log-rank p=0.0026). Both HLA-A*68:02 and HLA-DPB1*04:01 were associated with worse outcomes. Next, four HLA alleles that were associated with a later age of diagnosis were identified, which are detailed in Table V. Lastly, OS distinctions for five TCR V- or J-gene segment usage, HLA allele combinations were identified (Table VI). These distinctions were not found when assessing the potential correlation with OS with either the HLA allele arm, or the V- or J-gene segment usage arm, independently. In other words, the HLA allele arm and the V- or J-gene segment usage arm were treated as controls for the results obtained with the V- or J-gene segment usage, HLA allele combinations (Table S6). For example, 33 cases had both a TRAV12-3 gene segment and the HLA DQB1*05:01 allele. These cases had an OS that did not reach the median, whereas the remaining cases had a median OS of 199 days (p=0.013, Figure 4). The individual TRAV12-3 gene segment arm and the HLA-DQB1*05:01 allele arm did not have statistically significant correlations with OS (TRAV12-3 log-rank p=0.17; HLA DQB1*05:01 log-rank p=0.08).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table IV.

Specific HLA alleles were associated with lower OS probability in endemic BL cases.

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

Cases with specific HLA alleles were associated with a lower OS probability in endemic BL. (A) KM analysis demonstrates that cases with HLA-A*68:02 (n=14, black), had a lower OS probability than those without (n=91, grey); p=0.0026. (B) KM analysis demonstrates the cases with HLA-DPB1*04:01 (n=14, black), had a lower OS probability than those without (n=91, grey); p=0.038. BL: Burkitt lymphoma; OS: overall survival; KM: Kaplan-Meier.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table V.

Specific HLA alleles were associated with a later age of diagnosis in endemic BL cases.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table VI.

TCR gene segment, HLA allele combinations were associated with OS in endemic BL.

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

Endemic BL OS association with specific TCR gene segment, HLA allele combinations. KM analyses demonstrating higher OS probability in cases with the TRAV12-3, HLA-DQB1*05:01 combination (n=33, black), as compared to all other cases with a TRA recombination read recovery (n=72, grey); p=0.013. There was no significant OS difference in either allele independently. BL: Burkitt lymphoma; OS: overall survival; KM, Kaplan-Meier.

Anti-HIV TRA or TRB CDR3s in endemic BL cases were associated with improved outcomes. Cases that had TCR recombination read recoveries where at least one of the CDR3s matched known anti-HIV TRA or TRB CDR3s were identified. Next, the cases with the anti-HIV CDR3s were assessed for OS, versus all remaining cases with TRA or TRB recombination reads (Table S7). Twenty-two cases with an anti-HIV TRA CDR3 were identified and had an OS that did not cross the median compared to the 83 remaining cases which had a median OS of 215 days (log-rank p=0.0013) (Table VII, Figure 5A). Additionally, 10 cases with an anti-HIV TRB CDR3 also showed a higher OS probability as compared to all remaining cases, with the log-rank test representing a trend (p=0.24, Table VII, Figure 5B). Next, 99 cases which had Ann Arbor pathologic staging data were evaluated (that is, 6 cases from the preceding total of 105 cases did not have staging data). Cases with an anti-HIV CDR3 representing either TRA or TRB were found to have lower Ann Arbor pathologic staging in Mann-Whitney U analyses. For both the TRA and TRB analysis, cases with an anti-HIV TRA CDR3 or anti-HIV TRB CDR3 had a lower rank-sum, as compared to those cases without an anti-HIV TRA CDR3 or anti-HIV TRB CDR3 (Table VIII, Table S8). For example, for the 10 cases with an anti-HIV TRB CDR3, the median stage was II, whereas the median stage of the remaining 89 samples was III (Mann-Whitney U-test p=0.012, Figure 6). Similar analyses were done to identify any association with an immune response to EBV and survival or staging. Seventy-four cases with an anti-EBV TRA CDR3 were identified and had a median OS of 437 days, as compared to the 31 remaining cases which had a median OS of 165 days (log-rank p=0.005, Table VII). Cases with an anti-EBV TRA showed a trend towards a lower Ann Arbor pathologic stage using a Mann-Whitney U-test which did not reach statistical significance (data not shown).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table VII.

Endemic BL cases with anti-viral CDR3s for HIV and EBV were associated with a higher OS probability.

Figure 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 5.

Endemic BL cases with anti-HIV TRA CDR3s or anti-HIV TRB CDR3s had a higher OS probability. (A) In endemic BL, cases with an anti-HIV TRA CDR3 (n=22, black) had a higher OS probability than those with TRA recombination read recoveries but without anti-HIV TRA CDR3s (n=83, grey); p=0.0013. (B) In endemic BL, cases with an anti-HIV TRB CDR3 (n=10, black) had a trend towards higher OS probability than those with a TRB recombination read recovery but without anti-HIV TRB CDR3s (n=95, grey); p=0.24. BL: Burkitt lymphoma; HIV: human immunodeficiency virus; CDR3: complementarity determining region-3; OS: overall survival.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table VIII.

Cases with anti-HIV TCR recombinations were associated with a lower BL Ann Arbor pathologic stage.

Figure 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 6.

Independent-samples Mann-Whitney U-test comparing the Ann Arbor pathologic stage of cases with anti-HIV TRB CDR3s (n=10, left) with cases without an anti-HIV TRB CDR3 (n=89, right) in endemic BL; p=0.012. BL: Burkitt lymphoma; HIV: human immunodeficiency virus; CDR3: complementarity determining region-3.

Discussion

Overall, these results indicate an association of T-cell features with the development and outcomes of endemic BL. The analyses above represent the first exploration of immunogenomics of endemic BL, to the authors’ knowledge. Focusing on T-cell receptors alone, it is interesting that those patients with a TRG recovery did better than those without and that TRG recombination read recoveries significantly decreased as pathologic stage worsened. This result is consistent with conclusions that γδ T-cells are more common in clinical settings where there is documented HLA class I downregulation, which has been noted to occur in EBV infected B-cells. Further, tumor-infiltrating γδ T-cells have been shown to be favorable prognostically in many other cancers (23), and it is also well-known that these cells are durable. Clinical trials designed to exploit the positive impact of γδ T-cells, via stimulation by bisphosphonates and other strategies, are ongoing in other B-cell malignancies (24, 25). Most importantly, given that γδ T-cells can be stimulated by bisphosphonates, a further understanding of any potential positive role for γδ T-cells in the resource-limited areas where endemic BL occurs would seem to be a high priority.

While recent studies have assessed correlations of specific HLA alleles in other non-Hodgkin lymphomas settings (26), studies have not assessed HLA alleles with regard to BL clinical features. This study identified two HLA alleles associated with worse survival in endemic BL. One of the two HLA alleles associated with worse overall survival in this study was HLA-A*68:02, which is a highly prevalent HLA allele in sub-Saharan Africa (27). Notably, HLA-A*68 has been shown to be associated with a higher HIV viral load (28, 29), as well as a poor immune response in AIDS patients on antiretroviral therapy (30). Thus, having this HLA allele could not only imply poor responses to HIV, but also EBV. Also, in one study, HLA-A*68 was found to be more frequent in Hodgkin’s lymphoma patients (31). Four other HLA alleles were associated with later age of diagnosis in this study; one of these was HLA-DRB1*13:02. This allele has been noted to be a protective for allele cervical squamous cell carcinoma risk (32), and for malaria and Hepatitis B (33).

TCR V- or J-gene segment usage, HLA allele combinations, have been found to be associated with distinct OS probabilities in several different cancers. These conclusions have just begun to be translated into clinical settings. Preliminary research is ongoing to create tools that predict binding between the two receptors, TCR and HLA, to further advance this broad field (34, 35). Creating a repository of known binding pairs using this study and other studies representing known outcome associations for other cancers could potentially guide and validate future clinical trials.

Furthermore, this study adds to the knowledge base regarding the complex interactions HIV may have in endemic BL, as those who had evidence of an immune response against HIV had better OS probabilities and lower pathologic staging. Although HIV has a 6% prevalence in Uganda and viral suppression is reached in only 75% of individuals (https://phia.icap.columbia.edu/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/UPHIA-Summary-Sheet-2020.pdf), the HIV role in endemic BL has been understood to be limited. For example, one study identified only 5% of children with endemic BL having HIV (36), and another identified only one patient with HIV among 145 patients with endemic BL biopsies (37). However, cases with immunodeficiency-related BL in developed countries are highly correlated with HIV infection and represent worse outcomes (36, 38). Another report noted that in the in vivo setting HIV co-infection augments EBV tumorigenesis (39), and another indicated that those who were on anti-retroviral therapy for HIV had decreased co-infection with EBV and a decreased load of EBV (40). Thus, the question arises: how might an anti-HIV T-cell response be consistent with a better outcome in endemic BL? With regard to the EBV results from this study, the correlation between the detection of anti-EBV CDR3s and longer survival is consistent with the understanding that BL is driven by EBV and that the control of this virus by the immune system or therapeutics which are currently being developed may result in better control of the cancer.

With regard to limitations of this study, the study is primarily correlative. In addition, this study is limited given the lack of replicative sets for analysis. However, this study provides a starting point for identifying a T-cell response that appears to be strongly correlated with control of endemic BL progression, whether by increased anti-viral T-cell receptors or via effective combination of antigen presentation and TCR antigen binding.

Acknowledgements

The Authors gratefully acknowledge the contributions of USF research computing and the taxpayers of the State of Florida; and Ms. Lindsey Dickerson for extensive administrative support related to the NIH dbGaP approvals.

Footnotes

  • Authors’ Contributions

    TIH: Conceptualization; Formal analysis; Methodology; Visualization; Writing – Original draft preparation; Writing - review & editing. RJ: Methodology; Visualization. TS: Methodology; Software. GB: Project administration; Resources; Supervision; Writing - review & editing.

  • Supplementary Material

    SOM tables are available at: https://usf.box.com/s/m4ov678jz5nm82zswajntw5ai932u5u8

  • Conflicts of Interest

    The Authors declared that they have no conflicts of interest.

  • Artificial Intelligence (AI) Disclosure

    No artificial intelligence (AI) tools, including large language models or machine learning software, were used in the preparation, analysis, or presentation of this manuscript.

  • Received January 24, 2026.
  • Revision received March 30, 2026.
  • Accepted April 21, 2026.
  • Copyright © 2026 The Author(s). Published by the International Institute of Anticancer Research.

This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Buckle G,
    2. Maranda L,
    3. Skiles J,
    4. Ong’echa JM,
    5. Foley J,
    6. Epstein M,
    7. Vik TA,
    8. Schroeder A,
    9. Lemberger J,
    10. Rosmarin A,
    11. Remick SC,
    12. Bailey JA,
    13. Vulule J,
    14. Otieno JA,
    15. Moormann AM
    : Factors influencing survival among Kenyan children diagnosed with endemic Burkitt lymphoma between 2003 and 2011: A historical cohort study. Int J Cancer 139(6): 1231-1240, 2016. DOI: 10.1002/ijc.30170
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Solares S,
    2. León J,
    3. García-Gutiérrez L
    : The functional interaction between Epstein-Barr virus and MYC in the pathogenesis of Burkitt lymphoma. Cancers (Basel) 16(24): 4212, 2024. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16244212
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Martorelli D,
    2. Muraro E,
    3. Merlo A,
    4. Turrini R,
    5. Faè DA,
    6. Rosato A,
    7. Dolcetti R
    : Exploiting the interplay between innate and adaptive immunity to improve immunotherapeutic strategies for Epstein-Barr-virus-driven disorders. Clin Dev Immunol 2012: 931952, 2012. DOI: 10.1155/2012/931952
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. God JM,
    2. Haque A
    : Burkitt lymphoma: pathogenesis and immune evasion. J Oncol 2010: 516047, 2010. DOI: 10.1155/2010/516047
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Sidorov S,
    2. Fux L,
    3. Steiner K,
    4. Bounlom S,
    5. Traxel S,
    6. Azzi T,
    7. Berisha A,
    8. Berger C,
    9. Bernasconi M,
    10. Niggli FK,
    11. Perner Y,
    12. Pather S,
    13. Kempf W,
    14. Nadal D,
    15. Bürgler S
    : CD4 + T cells are found within endemic Burkitt lymphoma and modulate Burkitt lymphoma precursor cell viability and expression of pathogenically relevant Epstein–Barr virus genes. Cancer Immunol Immunother 71(6): 1371-1392, 2022. DOI: 10.1007/s00262-021-03057-5
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Wang J,
    2. Wang H,
    3. Ding Y,
    4. Cao N,
    5. Nan F,
    6. Wu F,
    7. Li C,
    8. Liang X,
    9. Xiao M,
    10. Guo J,
    11. Gao Z,
    12. Yan L,
    13. Zhou T,
    14. Li Y,
    15. Zhai Z
    : Gp350-targeted CAR-T therapy in EBV-positive Burkitt lymphoma: pre-clinical development of gp350 CAR-T. J Transl Med 23(1): 171, 2025. DOI: 10.1186/s12967-025-06188-w
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Zayac AS,
    2. Olszewski AJ
    : Burkitt lymphoma: bridging the gap between advances in molecular biology and therapy. Leuk Lymphoma 61(8): 1784-1796, 2020. DOI: 10.1080/10428194.2020.1747068
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Dabkowski TR,
    2. Varkhedi M,
    3. Song JJ,
    4. Gozlan EC,
    5. Blanck G
    : Neuroblastoma and glioblastoma cases with amplified oncogenes have reduced numbers of tumor-resident adaptive immune receptor recombinations. JCO Precis Oncol (7): e2300057, 2023. DOI: 10.1200/PO.23.00057
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  9. ↵
    1. Baulu E,
    2. Gardet C,
    3. Chuvin N,
    4. Depil S
    : TCR-engineered T cell therapy in solid tumors: State of the art and perspectives. Sci Adv 9(7): eadf3700, 2023. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.adf3700
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Lowe KL,
    2. Cole D,
    3. Kenefeck R,
    4. Okelly I,
    5. Lepore M,
    6. Jakobsen BK
    : Novel TCR-based biologics: mobilising T cells to warm ‘cold’ tumours. Cancer Treat Rev 77: 35-43, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2019.06.001
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Callahan BM,
    2. Yavorski JM,
    3. Tu YN,
    4. Tong WL,
    5. Kinskey JC,
    6. Clark KR,
    7. Fawcett TJ,
    8. Blanck G
    : T-cell receptor-β V and J usage, in combination with particular HLA class I and class II alleles, correlates with cancer survival patterns. Cancer Immunol Immunother 67(6): 885-892, 2018. DOI: 10.1007/s00262-018-2139-7
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Arndt MF,
    2. Koohestani DM,
    3. Chobrutskiy BI,
    4. Mihyu MM,
    5. Diaz M,
    6. Gozlan EC,
    7. Yeagley M,
    8. Zaman S,
    9. Roca AM,
    10. Blanck G
    : TRBV and TRBJ usage, when paired with specific HLA alleles, associates with distinct head and neck cancer survival rates. Hum Immunol 81(12): 692-696, 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.humimm.2020.08.007
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Huda TI,
    2. Mihyu M,
    3. Gozlan EC,
    4. Arndt MF,
    5. Diaz MJ,
    6. Zaman S,
    7. Chobrutskiy BI,
    8. Blanck G
    : Specific HLA alleles, paired with TCR V- and J-gene segment usage, link to distinct multiple myeloma survival rates. Leuk Lymphoma 62(7): 1711-1720, 2021. DOI: 10.1080/10428194.2021.1885655
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Freeman JD,
    2. Warren RL,
    3. Webb JR,
    4. Nelson BH,
    5. Holt RA
    : Profiling the T-cell receptor beta-chain repertoire by massively parallel sequencing. Genome Res 19(10): 1817-1824, 2009. DOI: 10.1101/gr.092924.109
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    1. Goel N,
    2. Baker MC,
    3. Aboujaoude MT,
    4. Diaz MJ,
    5. Jain R,
    6. Huda TI,
    7. Chobrutskiy A,
    8. Chobrutskiy BI,
    9. Song JJ,
    10. Vangala VNP,
    11. Blanck G
    : Better outcomes for ovarian cancer associated with the detection of anti-EBV TCR CDR3s: potential relevance to diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Am J Reprod Immunol 93(1): e70046, 2025. DOI: 10.1111/aji.70046
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Neerumalla P,
    2. Jain R,
    3. Aboujaoude MT,
    4. Hudock TR,
    5. Song JJ,
    6. Cao BH,
    7. Chobrutskiy A,
    8. Chobrutskiy BI,
    9. Blanck G
    : Chemical complementarity of blood-sourced, breast cancer-related TCR CDR3s and the CMV UL29 and IE1 antigens is associated with worse overall survival. Biochem Genet 63(5): 4331-4341, 2025. DOI: 10.1007/s10528-024-10934-y
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Diaz MJ,
    2. Kacsoh DB,
    3. Patel DN,
    4. Yeagley M,
    5. Hsiang M,
    6. Blanck G
    : Tumor resident, TRA anti-viral CDR3 chemical sequence motifs are associated with a better breast cancer outcome. Genes Immun 24(2): 92-98, 2023. DOI: 10.1038/s41435-023-00201-2
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Kacsoh DB,
    2. Diaz MJ,
    3. Gozlan EC,
    4. Sahoo A,
    5. Song JJ,
    6. Yeagley M,
    7. Chobrutskiy A,
    8. Chobrutskiy BI,
    9. Blanck G
    : Blood-based T cell receptor anti-viral CDR3s are associated with worse overall survival for neuroblastoma. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 149(13): 12047-12056, 2023. DOI: 10.1007/s00432-023-05059-5
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Grande BM,
    2. Gerhard DS,
    3. Jiang A,
    4. Griner NB,
    5. Abramson JS,
    6. Alexander TB,
    7. Allen H,
    8. Ayers LW,
    9. Bethony JM,
    10. Bhatia K,
    11. Bowen J,
    12. Casper C,
    13. Choi JK,
    14. Culibrk L,
    15. Davidsen TM,
    16. Dyer MA,
    17. Gastier-Foster JM,
    18. Gesuwan P,
    19. Greiner TC,
    20. Gross TG,
    21. Hanf B,
    22. Harris NL,
    23. He Y,
    24. Irvin JD,
    25. Jaffe ES,
    26. Jones SJM,
    27. Kerchan P,
    28. Knoetze N,
    29. Leal FE,
    30. Lichtenberg TM,
    31. Ma Y,
    32. Martin JP,
    33. Martin MR,
    34. Mbulaiteye SM,
    35. Mullighan CG,
    36. Mungall AJ,
    37. Namirembe C,
    38. Novik K,
    39. Noy A,
    40. Ogwang MD,
    41. Omoding A,
    42. Orem J,
    43. Reynolds SJ,
    44. Rushton CK,
    45. Sandlund JT,
    46. Schmitz R,
    47. Taylor C,
    48. Wilson WH,
    49. Wright GW,
    50. Zhao EY,
    51. Marra MA,
    52. Morin RD,
    53. Staudt LM
    : Genome-wide discovery of somatic coding and noncoding mutations in pediatric endemic and sporadic Burkitt lymphoma. Blood 133(12): 1313-1324, 2019. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2018-09-871418
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    1. Xie C,
    2. Yeo ZX,
    3. Wong M,
    4. Piper J,
    5. Long T,
    6. Kirkness EF,
    7. Biggs WH,
    8. Bloom K,
    9. Spellman S,
    10. Vierra-Green C,
    11. Brady C,
    12. Scheuermann RH,
    13. Telenti A,
    14. Howard S,
    15. Brewerton S,
    16. Turpaz Y,
    17. Venter JC
    : Fast and accurate HLA typing from short-read next-generation sequence data with xHLA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 114(30): 8059-8064, 2017. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1707945114
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    1. Chobrutskiy BI,
    2. Zaman S,
    3. Tong WL,
    4. Diviney A,
    5. Blanck G
    : Recovery of T-cell receptor V(D)J recombination reads from lower grade glioma exome files correlates with reduced survival and advanced cancer grade. J Neurooncol 140(3): 697-704, 2018. DOI: 10.1007/s11060-018-03001-1
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Goncharov M,
    2. Bagaev D,
    3. Shcherbinin D,
    4. Zvyagin I,
    5. Bolotin D,
    6. Thomas PG,
    7. Minervina AA,
    8. Pogorelyy MV,
    9. Ladell K,
    10. McLaren JE,
    11. Price DA,
    12. Nguyen THO,
    13. Rowntree LC,
    14. Clemens EB,
    15. Kedzierska K,
    16. Dolton G,
    17. Rius CR,
    18. Sewell A,
    19. Samir J,
    20. Luciani F,
    21. Zornikova KV,
    22. Khmelevskaya AA,
    23. Sheetikov SA,
    24. Efimov GA,
    25. Chudakov D,
    26. Shugay M
    : VDJdb in the pandemic era: a compendium of T cell receptors specific for SARS-CoV-2. Nat Methods 19(9): 1017-1019, 2022. DOI: 10.1038/s41592-022-01578-0
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Gentles AJ,
    2. Newman AM,
    3. Liu CL,
    4. Bratman SV,
    5. Feng W,
    6. Kim D,
    7. Nair VS,
    8. Xu Y,
    9. Khuong A,
    10. Hoang CD,
    11. Diehn M,
    12. West RB,
    13. Plevritis SK,
    14. Alizadeh AA
    : The prognostic landscape of genes and infiltrating immune cells across human cancers. Nat Med 21(8): 938-945, 2015. DOI: 10.1038/nm.3909
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Rimailho L,
    2. Faria C,
    3. Domagala M,
    4. Laurent C,
    5. Bezombes C,
    6. Poupot M
    : γδ T cells in immunotherapies for B-cell malignancies. Front Immunol 14: 1200003, 2023. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1200003
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Revesz IA,
    2. Joyce P,
    3. Ebert LM,
    4. Prestidge CA
    : Effective γδ T-cell clinical therapies: current limitations and future perspectives for cancer immunotherapy. Clin Transl Immunology 13(2): e1492, 2024. DOI: 10.1002/cti2.1492
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  26. ↵
    1. Zhong C,
    2. Cozen W,
    3. Bolanos R,
    4. Song J,
    5. Wang SS
    : The role of HLA variation in lymphoma aetiology and survival. J Intern Med 286(2): 154-180, 2019. DOI: 10.1111/joim.12911
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Kløverpris HN,
    2. Stryhn A,
    3. Harndahl M,
    4. Carlson JM,
    5. Leslie AJ,
    6. Chen F,
    7. Riddell L,
    8. Mulenga J,
    9. Walker BD,
    10. Ndung’u T,
    11. Buus S,
    12. Goulder P
    : HLA-A*68:02-restricted Gag-specific cytotoxic T lymphocyte responses can drive selection pressure on HIV but are subdominant and ineffective. AIDS 27(11): 1717-1723, 2013. DOI: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e32836146cd
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Tang J,
    2. Tang S,
    3. Lobashevsky E,
    4. Myracle AD,
    5. Fideli U,
    6. Aldrovandi G,
    7. Allen S,
    8. Musonda R,
    9. Kaslow RA, the Zambia-UAB HIV Research Project
    : Favorable and unfavorable HLA class I alleles and haplotypes in Zambians predominantly infected with clade C human immunodeficiency virus type 1. J Virol 76(16): 8276-8284, 2002. DOI: 10.1128/jvi.76.16.8276-8284.2002
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. ↵
    1. Gostick E,
    2. Cole DK,
    3. Hutchinson SL,
    4. Wooldridge L,
    5. Tafuro S,
    6. Laugel B,
    7. Lissina A,
    8. Oxenius A,
    9. Boulter JM,
    10. Price DA,
    11. Sewell AK
    : Functional and biophysical characterization of an HLA-A*6801-restricted HIV-specific T cell receptor. Eur J Immunol 37(2): 479-486, 2007. DOI: 10.1002/eji.200636243
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. El-Beeli M,
    2. Al-Mahrooqi SH,
    3. Youssef RM,
    4. Zadjali F,
    5. Balkhair A,
    6. Al-Balushi MS,
    7. Said EA,
    8. Hasson SS,
    9. Al-Jabri AA
    : HLA-A68 and HLA-B15 alleles correlate with poor immune response among AIDS patients on combined antiretroviral therapy. Hum Immunol 77(6): 490-497, 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.humimm.2016.04.009
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Sayad A,
    2. Akbari MT,
    3. Mehdizadeh M,
    4. Movafagh A,
    5. Hajifathali A
    : The association of HLA-class I and class II with Hodgkin’s lymphoma in Iranian patients. Biomed Res Int 2014: 231236, 2014. DOI: 10.1155/2014/231236
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    1. Madeleine MM,
    2. Johnson LG,
    3. Smith AG,
    4. Hansen JA,
    5. Nisperos BB,
    6. Li S,
    7. Zhao LP,
    8. Daling JR,
    9. Schwartz SM,
    10. Galloway DA
    : Comprehensive analysis of HLA-A, HLA-B, HLA-C, HLA-DRB1, and HLA-DQB1 loci and squamous cell cervical cancer risk. Cancer Res 68(9): 3532-3539, 2008. DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-6471
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. ↵
    1. Davenport MP,
    2. Quinn CL,
    3. Chicz RM,
    4. Green BN,
    5. Willis AC,
    6. Lane WS,
    7. Bell JI,
    8. Hill AV
    : Naturally processed peptides from two disease-resistance-associated HLA-DR13 alleles show related sequence motifs and the effects of the dimorphism at position 86 of the HLA-DR beta chain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 92(14): 6567-6571, 1995. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.92.14.6567
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. ↵
    1. Glazer N,
    2. Akerman O,
    3. Louzoun Y
    : Naive and memory T cells TCR-HLA-binding prediction. Oxf Open Immunol 3(1): iqac001, 2022. DOI: 10.1093/oxfimm/iqac001
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  35. ↵
    1. Mösch A,
    2. Frishman D
    : TCRpair: prediction of functional pairing between HLA-A*02:01-restricted T-cell receptor α and β chains. Bioinformatics 37(21): 3938-3940, 2021. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btab573
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. ↵
    1. Walusansa V,
    2. Okuku F,
    3. Orem J
    : Burkitt lymphoma in UGANDA, the legacy of Denis Burkitt and an update on the disease status. Br J Haematol 156(6): 757-760, 2012. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2012.09027.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. ↵
    1. Tumwine LK,
    2. Orem J,
    3. Kerchan P,
    4. Byarugaba W,
    5. Pileri SA
    : EBV, HHV8 and HIV in B cell non Hodgkin lymphoma in Kampala, Uganda. Infect Agent Cancer 5: 12, 2010. DOI: 10.1186/1750-9378-5-12
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. ↵
    1. Orem J,
    2. Mulumba Y,
    3. Algeri S,
    4. Bellocco R,
    5. Mangen FW,
    6. Mbidde EK,
    7. Weiderpass E
    : Clinical characteristics, treatment and outcome of childhood Burkitt’s lymphoma at the Uganda Cancer Institute. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 105(12): 717-726, 2011. DOI: 10.1016/j.trstmh.2011.08.008
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. ↵
    1. Whitehurst CB,
    2. Rizk M,
    3. Teklezghi A,
    4. Spagnuolo RA,
    5. Pagano JS,
    6. Wahl A
    : HIV co-infection augments EBV-induced tumorigenesis in vivo. Front Virol 2: 861628, 2022. DOI: 10.3389/fviro.2022.861628
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. ↵
    1. Petrara MR,
    2. Penazzato M,
    3. Massavon W,
    4. Nabachwa S,
    5. Nannyonga M,
    6. Mazza A,
    7. Gianesin K,
    8. Del Bianco P,
    9. Lundin R,
    10. Sumpter C,
    11. Zanchetta M,
    12. Giaquinto C,
    13. De Rossi A
    : Epstein-Barr virus load in children infected with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 in Uganda. J Infect Dis 210(3): 392-399, 2014. DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jiu099
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research: 46 (6)
Anticancer Research
Vol. 46, Issue 6
June 2026
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A Landscape of Immunogenomics Assessments for Endemic Burkitt Lymphoma: Relevance to Outcomes
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
4 + 12 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
A Landscape of Immunogenomics Assessments for Endemic Burkitt Lymphoma: Relevance to Outcomes
TAHA I. HUDA, RAHUL JAIN, TUSHAR SINGH, GEORGE BLANCK
Anticancer Research Jun 2026, 46 (6) 3231-3242; DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.18193

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
A Landscape of Immunogenomics Assessments for Endemic Burkitt Lymphoma: Relevance to Outcomes
TAHA I. HUDA, RAHUL JAIN, TUSHAR SINGH, GEORGE BLANCK
Anticancer Research Jun 2026, 46 (6) 3231-3242; DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.18193
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Comparison of RATS Lobectomy and VATS Lobectomy for Early-stage Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
  • Effectiveness of Chemotherapy With/Without Radiotherapy for Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Population-based Target Trial Emulation Study
  • Genomic Profiling of Cancerous Areas, Dysplasia, and Background Mucosa in Ulcerative Colitis-associated Colorectal Cancer
Show more Clinical Studies

Keywords

  • Burkitt Lymphoma
  • immunogenomics
  • HLA
  • blood sample exomes
  • immune biomarkers
Anticancer Research

© 2026 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire