Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleClinical Studies
Open Access

Clinical Parameters and Radiomics of Vestibular Schwannomas in NF2-related Schwannomatosis

NINA BOE, VICTOR-F. MAUTNER, REINHARD E. FRIEDRICH, SAID C. FARSCHTSCHI, LASSE DÜHRSEN, HANNO S. MEYER and JOHANNES A. KOEPPEN
Anticancer Research February 2026, 46 (2) 847-856; DOI: https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.17992
NINA BOE
1Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
VICTOR-F. MAUTNER
2Department of Neurology, University Hospital Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
REINHARD E. FRIEDRICH
3Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
SAID C. FARSCHTSCHI
2Department of Neurology, University Hospital Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
LASSE DÜHRSEN
1Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
HANNO S. MEYER
1Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
JOHANNES A. KOEPPEN
1Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: koeppen{at}uke.de
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background/Aim: NF2-related schwannomatosis is a rare hereditary tumor predisposition syndrome, formerly known as Neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2), and is characterized by the development of multiple schwannomas. The hallmark manifestation is the occurrence of bilateral vestibular schwannomas (VSs). Disease progression and clinical outcomes vary widely among patients, and conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) metrics—such as tumor size—do not fully account for these differences. Radiomic analysis offers a quantitative approach to extract advanced imaging biomarkers that may capture tumor microstructure and growth behavior more accurately, potentially improving prognostication and individualized management in NF2.

Patients and Methods: A retrospective cohort of 32 patients with NF2 was analyzed, comprising 170 cranial MRI scans of 232 VSs (112 left, 120 right) acquired at different time points over the course of disease, with previously treated tumors excluded. Tumor growth was quantified as absolute and percentage growth rates per month. Radiomic features were extracted from segmented tumors and correlated with Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) graded clinical findings. Hearing impairment was graded based on subjective function due to limited audiometric data.

Results: In this exploratory analysis, no Spearman |ρ| >0.40 correlations were observed between radiomics features and tumor growth rates, nor among clinical parameters (excluding depression and anxiety). Right-sided tumors were associated with significantly greater hearing impairment compared to left-sided tumors despite comparable volumes (p=0.030). Age-stratified analyses revealed distinct patterns: in younger patients (<30 years), fast-growing tumors displayed more homogeneous texture profiles, while in older patients (>30 years), rapid growth was linked to greater heterogeneity.

Conclusion: Radiomic profiling indicates that both tumor laterality and patient age influence the relationship between imaging features and clinical outcomes in NF2-associated VS. Homogeneity was linked to aggressive growth in younger patients, heterogeneity characterized progression in older patients. These findings suggest that radiomic biomarkers may complement volumetric measures and support individualized monitoring and treatment strategies in NF2.

Keywords:
  • NF2
  • radiomics
  • vestibular schwannomas
  • clinical parameters
  • tumor growth

Introduction

NF2-related schwannomatosis (NF2) is an autosomal dominant inherited disorder that predisposes affected individuals to the development of multiple neural tumors (1). The incidence is estimated at approximately 1 in 28,000, with a prevalence of about 1 in 50,000, numbers expected to increase due to advances in diagnostic techniques and an aging population (2, 3). The clinical characteristic feature of NF2 is the occurrence of bilateral vestibular schwannomas (VSs), which are present in nearly 90% of patients (4, 5).

Management of NF2 requires a careful balance between conservative surveillance and surgical intervention. In cases where vestibular schwannomas are not surgically accessible, systemic therapy with bevacizumab, an anti-VEGF monoclonal antibody, has also emerged as a treatment option to reduce tumor size and preserve hearing in selected patients (6). Radiotherapy may be considered when neither surgery nor medical therapy are feasible (7). All strategies, however, are associated with considerable risks (8-10). Although these risks are recognized, they have not yet been systematically investigated. The primary objective of therapy is to preserve neurological function and to maintain quality of life for as long as possible (11).

Age at first diagnosis represents an important prognostic marker in NF2. Patients with first diagnosis at a younger age typically show a more aggressive disease course, characterized by faster VS growth, greater tumor burden at baseline, and earlier deterioration of hearing function (Wishart phenotype) (12-14). Longitudinal NF2 cohorts have demonstrated that VS growth rates decline with advancing age (12, 13), while large-scale series and clinical overviews underscore the variability of tumor dynamics across different age strata (15, 16).

Radiomics enables the extraction of large sets of quantitative features from standard medical images, capturing tumor intensity, shape, and texture. These data can be correlated with clinical and molecular parameters to improve disease characterization, prognosis, and treatment planning, thereby supporting precision medicine (17-19).

Previous studies of sporadic VS have demonstrated that specific radiomic profiles can predict hearing decline (20) and may guide surveillance intervals. In our own prior work (21), we identified the radiomic feature wavelet-High–Low–High direction vector (HLH) - Gray Level Co-occurrence Matrix (GLCM)-Inverse Variance as a potential predictor of NF2-associated VS growth. Recent molecular studies have shown that pathogenic variants and allele loss in the NF2 and LZTR1 genes are prerequisite events for vestibular schwannoma development, yet even a higher mutational burden, although associated with increased structural heterogeneity on MRI, does not appear to determine tumor growth or clinical outcome (22).

These findings suggest that imaging-based tumor characteristics may capture biological variability beyond genetic alterations. Building on this concept, the present study applies radiomic analysis to quantify MRI-derived shape and texture features and to explore their associations with clinical parameters such as hearing loss and tumor size.

Patients and Methods

All analyses were performed on pseudonymized data, which were not traceable to individual patients. In accordance with the declaration from the Ethics Committee of the Hamburg Medical Council (Case Number: 2024-300549-WF), no concerns were raised regarding this research.

Study population. This retrospective analysis included 182 cranial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans from 35 consecutive patients with NF2 who were treated at the Neurofibromatosis Outpatient Department of the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf between 2002 and 2020. Genetic testing revealed no mosaic variants in this cohort. The diagnosis of NF2 was established according to the criteria applicable at the time of the patients’ initial presentation (23). Two patients were excluded due to implausible growth trajectories; in two further cases, imaging of one side was omitted after neurosurgical intervention. MRI data from four patients were excluded following treatment with Bevacizumab or Everolimus.

Following exclusions, the analysis comprised 170 cranial MRIs with a total of 232 vestibular schwannomas (left: 112; right: 120) from 32 patients. The median age at the time of the first MRI was 31 years (range=2-67 years), and the cohort consisted of 20 females and 12 males.

Radiomics analysis. For details of the workflow for radiomics analysis please refer to our previous paper (21).

Tumor growth. Tumor growth dynamics were assessed using two measures: 1) Mean monthly absolute growth rate (AGRpM) – defined as the absolute change in tumor volume (mm3) per month, averaged across the individual follow-up interval; 2) Percentage Growth Rate per Month (PGRpM) – defined as the relative change in tumor volume per month, expressed as a percentage of the initial tumor volume at baseline MRI.

Clinical findings. In the Neurofibromatosis Outpatient Department of the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, a pseudonymized registry is routinely maintained, documenting Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE)-graded severity of symptoms and clinical findings (24). This registry captures the typical functional impairments observed in patients with NF2.

The CTCAE was selected as the grading framework, as it represents the most widely accepted and standardized system for the assessment of symptom severity and functional impairments in oncology (25). For each CTCAE item, a five-point severity grading (Grade 1-5) is provided, with explicit definitions that reflect increasing clinical impact from mild manifestations to death. In total, 204 CTCAE reports from 29 patients were available, including 80 reports obtained within ±3 months of a corresponding radiomics-analyzed MRI. With respect to hearing impairment, only limited audiometric data were available, so that only subjective hearing function could be considered in the grading.

Statistical methods. Correlation analyses were conducted using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. The analyses between groups were performed with Welsh t-tests.

Results

Age and tumor growth. To analyze potential age-related influences on tumor characteristics, Spearman’s rank correlations were calculated. A significant negative correlation was found between patient age at the time of the first MRI and the AGRpM (ρ=−0.31; p=0.010). A significant negative correlation was also observed with the PGRpM at the time of the first MRI (ρ=−0.31, p=0.014). No significant correlation was found between age and initial tumor volume (shape_VoxelVolume) at the first MRI (ρ=0.17; p=0.194).

Correlations of clinical findings with shape based radiomics features. No correlation coefficients (|ρ| >0.40) were observed between tumor size or shape-based radiomic features (e.g., maximum tumor diameter, volume-to-surface ratio) and clinical findings.

Intercorrelations of clinical features. Spearman intercor-relation analysis of clinical findings revealed a strong positive correlation between depression and anxiety (ρ=0.62, p<0.001), as shown in Figure 1. No other correlations exceeded the threshold of |ρ| >0.30.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Heatmap illustrating Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients between CTCAE-graded clinical symptoms.

Laterality-dependent associations between tumor size and hearing loss. A Welch t-test of tumor volumes by side (left N=41, right N=37) showed no significant difference [t(−0.851), p=0.398]. For small- medium tumors (<8.0 cm3, 90.6% of all tumors), however, a significant difference between side and degree of hearing impairment was observed [t(−2.206), p=0.030, Figure 2].

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Laterality-dependent association between tumor size and hearing loss. Comparison of hearing function between right- and left-sided vestibular schwannomas. For small to medium tumors (<8.0 cm3, 90.6% of all tumors), right-sided lesions were associated with significantly greater hearing loss (t=−2.206, p=0.030) despite comparable tumor volumes (t=−0.851, p=0.398).

Age, tumor homogeneity, and tumor growth. The radiomics feature Inverse Variance reflects local gray-level homogeneity, with lower values associated with greater intratumoral heterogeneity (26). In younger patients, tumors with fast growth exhibited significantly lower heterogeneity compared to slowly growing tumors [t(-3.265, p=0.003]. Conversely, in older patients, low heterogeneity was observed in the subgroup with slow tumor growth [t(2.953), p=0.006 Figure 3].

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

Age-dependent relationship between tumor texture homogeneity and growth rate. Radiomic feature GLCM Inverse Variance (reflecting local gray-level homogeneity) stratified by age group and tumor growth dynamics. In younger patients (<30 years), rapidly growing tumors exhibited greater homogeneity (lower Inverse Variance), whereas in older patients (>30 years), fast-growing tumors showed higher heterogeneity (higher Inverse Variance). Error bars indicate interquartile range (25 and 75%).

Discussion

Study limitations. This study has several noteworthy limitations. Being retrospective in nature, the generalizability of its findings is inherently constrained (27-29). Moreover, the modest sample size of 32 patients warrants cautious interpretation. Another important consideration is the 5-mm slice thickness of the segmented T2-weighted sequences, which may introduce partial volume effects and thus potential bias (30). To minimize this risk, each segmentation was cross-referenced with the preceding time point.

Age and tumor growth. In our NF2 cohort, patient age at first MRI was inversely associated with relative growth rates (AGRpM and PGRpM), while no relationship was observed with baseline tumor volume. This finding suggests that younger patients with NF2 may experience more aggressive tumor dynamics, consistent with earlier reports that younger age at onset is linked to higher growth activity and a more severe clinical phenotype (9, 12). The absence of a correlation between age and initial tumor volume emphasizes that baseline size at diagnosis is not a reliable marker of subsequent behavior in NF2. Rather, the effect of age appears to manifest in longitudinal kinetics rather than cross-sectional measurements, which aligns with prior observations that tumor burden and progression in NF2 are influenced more strongly by genetic background and age at onset than by presentation size (31).

Taken together, these findings highlight age at presentation as a potential prognostic factor in NF2-associated VS and support close surveillance of younger patients, even in cases with relatively small initial tumor volumes.

Correlations of clinical findings with shape based radiomics features. No correlation coefficients (|ρ| >0.40) were observed between tumor size or shape-based radiomic features and clinical findings. This suggests that macroscopic geometric properties, such as maximum tumor diameter or the volume-to-surface ratio, may have limited explanatory value for symptom burden in NF2-associated vestibular schwannomas. The absence of strong associations is consistent with prior work indicating that clinical manifestations are often determined less by absolute size than by tumor location, growth direction, and involvement of critical neurovascular structures (12, 31). Moreover, shape descriptors provide only coarse information on tumor geometry and do not capture microstructural heterogeneity or nerve compression patterns, which are likely to be more relevant for functional impairment. These findings highlight the importance of complementary radiomic texture features and longitudinal growth metrics, rather than static size- or shape-based measures alone, when attempting to link imaging characteristics with clinical outcomes.

Intercorrelations of clinical features. To our knowledge, no previous studies have systematically examined intercorrelations among clinical symptoms in NF2-associated VS. Existing literature primarily describes the frequency and sequence of symptom onset, with hearing loss typically representing the earliest manifestation and often accompanied by tinnitus or imbalance (7, 11). However, statistical relationships between symptom domains have not been reported. Our correlation analysis therefore provides novel insight into how distinct clinical features cluster in NF2. Among the intercorrelations of clinical findings, the strongest association was observed between depression and anxiety (ρ=0.62), reflecting the close relationship of these neuropsychiatric comorbidities. Moderate correlations were also observed between tinnitus and vestibular dysfunction, as well as between depression and gait disturbance. These findings highlight the multifactorial burden of NF2 and suggest that symptom domains may partially interact, rather than occurring in complete isolation.

Laterality-dependent associations between tumor size and hearing loss. As audiometric data were limited, grading of hearing impairment relied on subjective hearing function, based on patients’ self-reported hearing ability. The observed laterality-dependent difference in hearing impairment, with more pronounced dysfunction in right-sided tumors despite comparable volumes, suggests that factors beyond tumor size contribute to auditory decline. Functional neuroimaging and neurophysiological studies indicate hemispheric asymmetries in auditory processing, with the left auditory cortex more specialized for temporal resolution and speech-related features, and the right auditory cortex preferentially involved in spectral and pitch-related processing (32). Such lateralized cortical organization may render right-sided vestibular schwannomas more disruptive to specific auditory pathways, thereby amplifying functional impairment relative to left-sided lesions of similar size. These findings underscore the need for future studies integrating structural, functional, and radiomic analyses to clarify the mechanisms underlying laterality effects in NF2-associated VS.

Age, tumor homogeneity, and tumor growth. Age-stratified analysis showed that the association between tumor homogeneity and growth differed by age. In younger patients, fast-growing tumors were characterized by more homogeneous texture patterns (low values of GLCM Inverse Variance), whereas in older patients, rapid growth was linked to greater heterogeneity (high values of GLCM Inverse Variance).

The isolated significance of log-sigma-6-5-3D_glcm_ InverseVariance may be explained by its ability to emphasize regional intensity patterns at a biologically relevant scale. Log filtering highlights tumor microstructural heterogeneity by suppressing noise and enhancing structures within a defined frequency band, thereby stabilizing texture descriptors such as Inverse Variance. Other homogeneity features, operating at finer or broader scales or without filtering, may dilute these regional effects and thus fail to capture them robustly (33-35).

This age-dependent importance of radiomic homogeneity metrics should be interpreted cautiously. To date, there is no robust evidence that age modifies the association between radiomic homogeneity metrics (e.g., GLCM-based features) and phenotype in NF2-associated vestibular schwannoma. We are not aware of studies that explicitly model an age × homogeneity interaction in NF2 cohorts. Existing NF2 literature chiefly reports age- and genotype-related differences in growth dynamics and describes structural subtypes (e.g., cystic change) in long-standing or treated lesions, but it does not provide age-stratified analyses of MRI-derived homogeneity features. Accordingly, any age-dependent interpretation of radiomic homogeneity in NF2 should be considered hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation.

Analogously though, in pediatric diffuse midline glioma, medium-scale MRI texture homogeneity at diagnosis predicted worse survival, underscoring that age-group and spatial scale can invert the prognostic meaning of ‘homogeneity’ (36), a concept consistent with our age-stratified findings in NF2.

The age-dependent association between tumor homogeneity and growth may reflect underlying biological differences. In younger patients, rapid growth likely arises from aggressive but relatively uniform tumor cell populations, consistent with prior evidence that younger age and truncating NF2 mutations are linked to faster progression and more severe phenotypes (37, 38). In contrast, fast-growing tumors in older patients may be driven by secondary changes such as cystic degeneration or fibrosis which have been described in long-standing or treated NF2-associated VS. These findings may suggest that distinct biological mechanisms underlie tumor progression in different age groups in NF2-associated VS. Taken together, these findings indicate that radiomic measures of homogeneity may provide an age-dependent biomarker of tumor aggressiveness and could help refine both monitoring strategies and treatment decisions in NF2-associated VS.

Conclusion

In this NF2-related schwannomatosis cohort, younger age at first MRI was linked to faster longitudinal tumor growth, while baseline tumor volume showed no age dependence. This suggests that age-related risk is primarily reflected in tumor growth kinetics rather than initial size, consistent with prior evidence that NF2 progression is more strongly influenced by genetic background and age at onset than by presentation volume.

No significant associations emerged between size- or shape-based radiomic features and clinical symptoms, indicating that macroscopic tumor geometry alone provides limited insight into functional outcomes. Despite comparable tumor volumes, right-sided vestibular schwannomas were associated with greater hearing impairment, supporting the influence of lateralized auditory processing and side-specific neural pathways over bulk tumor effects.

Age-stratified texture analysis revealed a potential effect modification: in younger patients, faster-growing tumors exhibited more homogeneous texture profiles, while in older patients, rapid growth corresponded to greater heterogeneity. The prominence of the log-sigma-6-5-3D_glcm_InverseVariance feature likely reflects its ability to capture biologically meaningful mid-scale intensity patterns.

Overall, these findings highlight the value of incorporating age- and texture-aware radiomic biomarkers into NF2 monitoring strategies. Radiomic profiling may complement conventional volumetric measures by providing noninvasive indicators of biological behavior and could support individualized surveillance and treatment planning in NF2-associated vestibular schwannomas. Future prospective studies are warranted to validate these hypothesis-generating observations.

Acknowledgements

The MRI series and anonymized clinical data were kindly provided by Prof. Victor-F. Mautner from the Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE).

Footnotes

  • Authors’ Contributions

    Study conception and design: Nina Boe, Johannes A. Koeppen, Victor-F. Mautner; Data collection: Victor-F. Mautner; Data analysis: Nina Boe, Johannes Koeppen; Results interpretation: Reinhard E. Friedrich, Victor-F. Mautner, Nina Boe, Johannes A. Koeppen; Drafting the manuscript: Nina Boe, Johannes Koeppen, Reinhard E. Friedrich, Said C. Farschtschi, Hanno S. Meyer; Manuscript revision and approval: All Authors.

  • Conflicts of Interest

    SF has received speaker honoraria from Alexion and compensation for advice or lecturing from SpringWorks and Alexion not related to this study. All other Authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

  • Funding

    This study was funded by the German lay organisation Bundesverband Neurofibromatose.

  • Artificial Intelligence (AI) Disclosure

    All statistical analyses were performed without the use of artificial intelligence. ChatGPT (OpenAI) was employed solely to assist with literature searches and the translation of German text into English. Its output was used only in part and was carefully reviewed and verified by the Authors before inclusion.

  • Received October 14, 2025.
  • Revision received November 3, 2025.
  • Accepted November 5, 2025.
  • Copyright © 2026 The Author(s). Published by the International Institute of Anticancer Research.

This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Lloyd SK,
    2. Evans DG
    : Neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2): diagnosis and management. Handb Clin Neurol 115: 957-967, 2013. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-444-52902-2.00054-0
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Evans DG,
    2. Bowers NL,
    3. Tobi S,
    4. Hartley C,
    5. Wallace AJ,
    6. King AT,
    7. Lloyd SKW,
    8. Rutherford SA,
    9. Hammerbeck-Ward C,
    10. Pathmanaban ON,
    11. Freeman SR,
    12. Ealing J,
    13. Kellett M,
    14. Laitt R,
    15. Thomas O,
    16. Halliday D,
    17. Ferner R,
    18. Taylor A,
    19. Duff C,
    20. Harkness EF,
    21. Smith MJ
    : Schwannomatosis: a genetic and epidemiological study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 89(11): 1215-1219, 2018. DOI: 10.1136/jnnp-2018-318538
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Evans DG,
    2. King AT,
    3. Bowers NL,
    4. Tobi S,
    5. Wallace AJ,
    6. Perry M,
    7. Anup R,
    8. Lloyd SKL,
    9. Rutherford SA,
    10. Hammerbeck-Ward C,
    11. Pathmanaban ON,
    12. Stapleton E,
    13. Freeman SR,
    14. Kellett M,
    15. Halliday D,
    16. Parry A,
    17. Gair JJ,
    18. Axon P,
    19. Laitt R,
    20. Thomas O,
    21. Afridi S,
    22. Ferner RE,
    23. Harkness EF,
    24. Smith MJ, English Specialist NF2 Research Group
    : Identifying the deficiencies of current diagnostic criteria for Neurofibromatosis 2 using databases of 2777 individuals with molecular testing. Genet Med 21(7): 1525-1533, 2019. DOI: 10.1038/s41436-018-0384-y
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  4. ↵
    1. Mautner VF,
    2. Lindenau M,
    3. Baser ME,
    4. Hazim W,
    5. Tatagiba M,
    6. Haase W,
    7. Samii M,
    8. Wais R,
    9. Pulst SM
    : The neuroimaging and clinical spectrum of neurofibromatosis 2. Neurosurgery 38(5): 880-886, 1996. DOI: 10.1097/00006123-199605000-00004
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Dirks MS,
    2. Butman JA,
    3. Kim HJ,
    4. Wu T,
    5. Morgan K,
    6. Tran AP,
    7. Lonser RR,
    8. Asthagiri AR
    : Long-term natural history of neurofibromatosis Type 2–associated intracranial tumors. J Neurosurg 117(1): 109-117, 2012. DOI: 10.3171/2012.3.jns111649
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Blakeley JO,
    2. Evans DG,
    3. Adler J,
    4. Brackmann D,
    5. Chen R,
    6. Ferner RE,
    7. Hanemann CO,
    8. Harris G,
    9. Huson SM,
    10. Jacob A,
    11. Kalamarides M,
    12. Karajannis MA,
    13. Korf BR,
    14. Mautner VF,
    15. McClatchey AI,
    16. Miao H,
    17. Plotkin SR,
    18. Slattery W 3rd.,
    19. Stemmer-Rachamimov AO,
    20. Welling DB,
    21. Wen PY,
    22. Widemann B,
    23. Hunter-Schaedle K,
    24. Giovannini M
    : Consensus recommendations for current treatments and accelerating clinical trials for patients with neurofibromatosis type 2. Am J Med Genet A 158A(1): 24-41, 2012. DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.34359
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  7. ↵
    1. Evans DG,
    2. Halliday D,
    3. Obholzer R,
    4. Afridi S,
    5. Forde C,
    6. Rutherford SA,
    7. Hammerbeck-Ward C,
    8. Lloyd SK,
    9. Freeman SM,
    10. Pathmanaban ON,
    11. Thomas OM,
    12. Laitt RD,
    13. Stivaros S,
    14. Kilday JP,
    15. Vassallo G,
    16. McBain C,
    17. Lavin T,
    18. Paterson C,
    19. Whitfield G,
    20. McCabe MG,
    21. Axon PR,
    22. Halliday J,
    23. Mackeith S,
    24. Parry A, English Specialist NF2 Research Group,
    25. Harkness EF,
    26. Buttimore J,
    27. King AT
    : Radiation treatment of benign tumors in NF2-related-schwannomatosis: A national study of 266 irradiated patients showing a significant increase in malignancy/malignant progression. Neurooncol Adv 5(1): vdad025, 2023. DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdad025
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  8. ↵
    1. Samii M,
    2. Matthies C,
    3. Tatagiba M
    : Management of vestibular schwannomas (acoustic neuromas): auditory and facial nerve function after resection of 120 vestibular schwannomas in patients with neurofibromatosis 2. Neurosurg 40(4): 696-706, 1997. DOI: 10.1097/00006123-199704000-00007
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Baser ME,
    2. Mautner VF,
    3. Parry DM,
    4. Evans DG
    : Methodological issues in longitudinal studies: vestibular schwannoma growth rates in neurofibromatosis 2. J Med Genet 42(12): 903-906, 2005. DOI: 10.1136/jmg.2005.031302
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. Chung LK,
    2. Nguyen TP,
    3. Sheppard JP,
    4. Lagman C,
    5. Tenn S,
    6. Lee P,
    7. Kaprealian T,
    8. Chin R,
    9. Gopen Q,
    10. Yang I
    : A systematic review of radiosurgery versus surgery for neurofibromatosis type 2 vestibular schwannomas. World Neurosurg 109: 47-58, 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.08.159
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Evans DG
    : Neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2): a clinical and molecular review. Orphanet J Rare Dis 4: 16, 2009. DOI: 10.1186/1750-1172-4-16
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Baser ME,
    2. Makariou EV,
    3. Parry DM
    : Predictors of vestibular schwannoma growth in patients with neurofibromatosis type 2. J Neurosurg 96(2): 217-222, 2002. DOI: 10.3171/jns.2002.96.2.0217
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Mautner VF,
    2. Baser ME,
    3. Thakkar SD,
    4. Feigen UM,
    5. Friedman JM,
    6. Kluwe L
    : Vestibular schwannoma growth in patients with neurofibromatosis Type 2: a longitudinal study. J Neurosurg 96(2): 223-228, 2002. DOI: 10.3171/jns.2002.96.2.0223
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Gugel I,
    2. Zipfel J,
    3. Hartjen P,
    4. Kluwe L,
    5. Tatagiba M,
    6. Mautner VF,
    7. Schuhmann MU
    : Managing NF2-associated vestibular schwannomas in children and young adults: review of an institutional series regarding effects of surgery and bevacizumab on growth rates, tumor volume, and hearing quality. Childs Nerv Syst 36(10): 2471-2480, 2020. DOI: 10.1007/s00381-020-04728-x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Forde C,
    2. King AT,
    3. Rutherford SA,
    4. Hammerbeck-Ward C,
    5. Lloyd SK,
    6. Freeman SR,
    7. Pathmanaban ON,
    8. Stapleton E,
    9. Thomas OM,
    10. Laitt RD,
    11. Stivaros S,
    12. Kilday JP,
    13. Vassallo G,
    14. McBain C,
    15. Kerrigan S,
    16. Smith MJ,
    17. McCabe MG,
    18. Harkness EF,
    19. Evans DG
    : Disease course of neurofibromatosis type 2: a 30-year follow-up study of 353 patients seen at a single institution. Neuro Oncol 23(7): 1113-1124, 2021. DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noaa284
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Evans DG
    : NF2-related schwannomatosis. In: GeneReviews®. University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA, 2023.
  17. ↵
    1. Lambin P,
    2. Rios-Velazquez E,
    3. Leijenaar R,
    4. Carvalho S,
    5. van Stiphout RG,
    6. Granton P,
    7. Zegers CM,
    8. Gillies R,
    9. Boellard R,
    10. Dekker A,
    11. Aerts HJ
    : Radiomics: extracting more information from medical images using advanced feature analysis. Eur J Cancer 48(4): 441-446, 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2011.11.036
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Gillies RJ,
    2. Kinahan PE,
    3. Hricak H
    : Radiomics: images are more than pictures, they are data. Radiology 278(2): 563-577, 2016. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2015151169
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Aerts HJ,
    2. Velazquez ER,
    3. Leijenaar RT,
    4. Parmar C,
    5. Grossmann P,
    6. Carvalho S,
    7. Bussink J,
    8. Monshouwer R,
    9. Haibe-Kains B,
    10. Rietveld D,
    11. Hoebers F,
    12. Rietbergen MM,
    13. Leemans CR,
    14. Dekker A,
    15. Quackenbush J,
    16. Gillies RJ,
    17. Lambin P
    : Decoding tumour phenotype by noninvasive imaging using a quantitative radiomics approach. Nat Commun 5: 4006, 2014. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms5006
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Lim KH,
    2. Lee SH,
    3. Song I,
    4. Yoon HS,
    5. Kim HJ,
    6. Lee YH,
    7. Kim E,
    8. Rah YC,
    9. Choi J
    : Analysis of the association between vestibular schwannoma and hearing status using a newly developed radiomics technique. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 281(6): 2951-2957, 2024. DOI: 10.1007/s00405-023-08410-1
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Boe N,
    2. Mautner VF,
    3. Friedrich RE,
    4. Farschtschi SC,
    5. DÜhrsen L,
    6. Meyer HS,
    7. Koeppen JA
    : Radiomics for growth prediction of vestibular schwannomas in neurofibromatosis type 2. Anticancer Res 45(5): 2137-2146, 2025. DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.17588
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    1. Breun M,
    2. Schulz T,
    3. Monoranu CM,
    4. Ernestus RI,
    5. Matthies C,
    6. Löhr M,
    7. Kluwe L
    : Pathogenic variants and allele loss of the NF2 and LZTR1 gene in sporadic vestibular schwannoma. In Vivo 39(3): 1251-1261, 2025. DOI: 10.21873/invivo.13929
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    1. Gutmann DH,
    2. Aylsworth A,
    3. Carey JC,
    4. Korf B,
    5. Marks J,
    6. Pyeritz RE,
    7. Rubenstein A,
    8. Viskochil D
    : The diagnostic evaluation and multidisciplinary management of neurofibromatosis 1 and neurofibromatosis 2. JAMA 278(1): 51, 1997. DOI: 10.1001/jama.1997.03550010065042
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis
    : Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, MD, 2017. Available at: https://ctep.cancer.gov/protocoldevelopment/electronic_applications/docs/CTCAE_v5_Quick_Reference_5x7.pdf [Last accessed on September 30, 2025]
  24. ↵
    1. Trotti A,
    2. Colevas AD,
    3. Setser A,
    4. Basch E
    : Patient-reported outcomes and the evolution of adverse event reporting in oncology. J Clin Oncol 25(32): 5121-5127, 2007. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2007.12.4784
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    1. van Griethuysen JJM,
    2. Fedorov A,
    3. Parmar C,
    4. Hosny A,
    5. Aucoin N,
    6. Narayan V,
    7. Beets-Tan RGH,
    8. Fillion-Robin JC,
    9. Pieper S,
    10. Aerts HJWL
    : Computational radiomics system to decode the radiographic phenotype. Cancer Res 77(21): e104-e107, 2017. DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-17-0339
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    1. Tofthagen C
    : Threats to validity in retrospective studies. J Adv Pract Oncol 3(3): 181-183, 2012. DOI: 10.6004/jadpro.2012.3.3.7
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Talari K,
    2. Goyal M
    : Retrospective studies – utility and caveats. J R Coll Physicians Edinb 50(4): 398-402, 2020. DOI: 10.4997/jrcpe.2020.409
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Wang H,
    2. Qu T,
    3. Bernstein K,
    4. Barbee D,
    5. Kondziolka D
    : Automatic segmentation of vestibular schwannomas from T1-weighted MRI with a deep neural network. Radiat Oncol 18(1): 78, 2023. DOI: 10.1186/s13014-023-02263-y
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. González Ballester MA,
    2. Zisserman AP,
    3. Brady M
    : Estimation of the partial volume effect in MRI. Med Image Anal 6(4): 389-405, 2002. DOI: 10.1016/S1361-8415(02)00061-0
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Asthagiri AR,
    2. Parry DM,
    3. Butman JA,
    4. Kim HJ,
    5. Tsilou ET,
    6. Zhuang Z,
    7. Lonser RR
    : Neurofibromatosis type 2. Lancet 373(9679): 1974-1986, 2009. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60259-2
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Zatorre RJ,
    2. Belin P
    : Spectral and temporal processing in human auditory cortex. Cereb Cortex 11(10): 946-953, 2001. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/11.10.946
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Lambin P,
    2. Leijenaar RTH,
    3. Deist TM,
    4. Peerlings J,
    5. de Jong EEC,
    6. van Timmeren J,
    7. Sanduleanu S,
    8. Larue RTHM,
    9. Even AJG,
    10. Jochems A,
    11. van Wijk Y,
    12. Woodruff H,
    13. van Soest J,
    14. Lustberg T,
    15. Roelofs E,
    16. van Elmpt W,
    17. Dekker A,
    18. Mottaghy FM,
    19. Wildberger JE,
    20. Walsh S
    : Radiomics: the bridge between medical imaging and personalized medicine. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 14(12): 749-762, 2017. DOI: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2017.141
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Zwanenburg A,
    2. Vallières M,
    3. Abdalah MA,
    4. Aerts HJWL,
    5. Andrearczyk V,
    6. Apte A,
    7. Ashrafinia S,
    8. Bakas S,
    9. Beukinga RJ,
    10. Boellaard R,
    11. Bogowicz M,
    12. Boldrini L,
    13. Buvat I,
    14. Cook GJR,
    15. Davatzikos C,
    16. Depeursinge A,
    17. Desseroit MC,
    18. Dinapoli N,
    19. Dinh CV,
    20. Echegaray S,
    21. El Naqa I,
    22. Fedorov AY,
    23. Gatta R,
    24. Gillies RJ,
    25. Goh V,
    26. Götz M,
    27. Guckenberger M,
    28. Ha SM,
    29. Hatt M,
    30. Isensee F,
    31. Lambin P,
    32. Leger S,
    33. Leijenaar RTH,
    34. Lenkowicz J,
    35. Lippert F,
    36. Losnegård A,
    37. Maier-Hein KH,
    38. Morin O,
    39. Müller H,
    40. Napel S,
    41. Nioche C,
    42. Orlhac F,
    43. Pati S,
    44. Pfaehler EAG,
    45. Rahmim A,
    46. Rao AUK,
    47. Scherer J,
    48. Siddique MM,
    49. Sijtsema NM,
    50. Socarras Fernandez J,
    51. Spezi E,
    52. Steenbakkers RJHM,
    53. Tanadini-Lang S,
    54. Thorwarth D,
    55. Troost EGC,
    56. Upadhaya T,
    57. Valentini V,
    58. van Dijk LV,
    59. van Griethuysen J,
    60. van Velden FHP,
    61. Whybra P,
    62. Richter C,
    63. Löck S
    : The Image Biomarker Standardization Initiative: Standardized quantitative radiomics for high-throughput image-based phenotyping. Radiology 295(2): 328-338, 2020. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2020191145
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    1. Rizzo S,
    2. Botta F,
    3. Raimondi S,
    4. Origgi D,
    5. Fanciullo C,
    6. Morganti AG,
    7. Bellomi M
    : Radiomics: the facts and the challenges of image analysis. Eur Radiol Exp 2(1): 36, 2018. DOI: 10.1186/s41747-018-0068-z
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    1. Szychot E,
    2. Youssef A,
    3. Ganeshan B,
    4. Endozo R,
    5. Hyare H,
    6. Gains J,
    7. Mankad K,
    8. Shankar A
    : Predicting outcome in childhood diffuse midline gliomas using magnetic resonance imaging based texture analysis. J Neuroradiol 48(4): 243-247, 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.neurad.2020.02.005
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    1. Baser ME,
    2. Friedman JM,
    3. Aeschliman D,
    4. Joe H,
    5. Wallace AJ,
    6. Ramsden RT,
    7. Evans DG
    : Predictors of the risk of mortality in neurofibromatosis 2. Am J Hum Genet 71(4): 715-723, 2002. DOI: 10.1086/342716
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    1. Teranishi Y,
    2. Miyawaki S,
    3. Nakatomi H,
    4. Ohara K,
    5. Hongo H,
    6. Dofuku S,
    7. Okano A,
    8. Takayanagi S,
    9. Ota T,
    10. Yoshimura J,
    11. Qu W,
    12. Mitsui J,
    13. Morishita S,
    14. Tsuji S,
    15. Saito N
    : Early prediction of functional prognosis in neurofibromatosis type 2 patients based on genotype-phenotype correlation with targeted deep sequencing. Sci Rep 12(1): 9543, 2022. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-13580-9
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research: 46 (2)
Anticancer Research
Vol. 46, Issue 2
February 2026
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Clinical Parameters and Radiomics of Vestibular Schwannomas in NF2-related Schwannomatosis
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
16 + 3 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Clinical Parameters and Radiomics of Vestibular Schwannomas in NF2-related Schwannomatosis
NINA BOE, VICTOR-F. MAUTNER, REINHARD E. FRIEDRICH, SAID C. FARSCHTSCHI, LASSE DÜHRSEN, HANNO S. MEYER, JOHANNES A. KOEPPEN
Anticancer Research Feb 2026, 46 (2) 847-856; DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.17992

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Clinical Parameters and Radiomics of Vestibular Schwannomas in NF2-related Schwannomatosis
NINA BOE, VICTOR-F. MAUTNER, REINHARD E. FRIEDRICH, SAID C. FARSCHTSCHI, LASSE DÜHRSEN, HANNO S. MEYER, JOHANNES A. KOEPPEN
Anticancer Research Feb 2026, 46 (2) 847-856; DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.17992
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Patients and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Acknowledgements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • The Prognostic Impact of Perioperative Inflammatory Status in Elderly Patients With Gastric Cancer
  • Preoperative Serum Total Cholesterol Predicts Adjuvant Chemotherapy Completion After Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Pancreatic Cancer
  • Predictive Role of PSA Kinetics in Oncological Outcomes of Metastatic Castration-sensitive Prostate Cancer
Show more Clinical Studies

Keywords

  • NF2
  • radiomics
  • vestibular schwannomas
  • clinical parameters
  • tumor growth
Anticancer Research

© 2026 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire