Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleExperimental Studies
Open Access

Paucimannosylation Is a Prognostic Marker in High-grade Serous Ovarian Cancer

EVA EGGER, SARAH FÖRSTER, LINA ADLOFF, MILKA MARINOVA, LUCIA A. OTTEN, CAROLIN SCHRÖDER, DOMINIQUE KÖNSGEN, ALEXANDER MUSTEA, THORE THIESLER and MICHAEL MUDERS
Anticancer Research January 2026, 46 (1) 85-94; DOI: https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.17925
EVA EGGER
1Department of Gynecology and Gynecological Oncology, University Hospital, Bonn, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: eva-katharina.egger{at}ukbonn.de
SARAH FÖRSTER
2Department of Pathology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
LINA ADLOFF
1Department of Gynecology and Gynecological Oncology, University Hospital, Bonn, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MILKA MARINOVA
3Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Bonn, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
LUCIA A. OTTEN
1Department of Gynecology and Gynecological Oncology, University Hospital, Bonn, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
CAROLIN SCHRÖDER
1Department of Gynecology and Gynecological Oncology, University Hospital, Bonn, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOMINIQUE KÖNSGEN
1Department of Gynecology and Gynecological Oncology, University Hospital, Bonn, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
ALEXANDER MUSTEA
1Department of Gynecology and Gynecological Oncology, University Hospital, Bonn, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
THORE THIESLER
2Department of Pathology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MICHAEL MUDERS
2Department of Pathology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background/Aim: Aberrant glycosylation is recognized as a trait of tumorigenesis. Paucimannosidic glycoepitopes (PME), a class of small mannosidic N-linked glycans have recently been linked to pathophysiologic conditions such as cancer and infection. This study aimed to investigate whether paucimannosylation is present in ovarian cancer and to explore its prognostic relevance.

Patients and Methods: We investigated the presence of PMEs in 176 patients with high-grade serous ovarian cancer using the research Mannitou antibody for immunohistochemistry. Immunohistochemical staining was assessed using eight different scoring systems and correlated with survival using the Kaplan–Meier method.

Results: Positive immunohistochemical staining of PMEs in immune cells was associated with improved 5-year disease-free survival (16.06% vs. 6.16%; p=0.032) and a trend toward improved 5-year overall survival (42.20% vs. 36.70%; p=0.052). Focal hot spot PME staining affecting more than 50% of tumor cells was associated with reduced 5-year overall survival (46.23% vs. 23.68%; p=0.029). Clinical factors such as tumor load, tumor distribution or FIGO-Stage showed no association with any PME staining pattern.

Conclusion: Paucimannosylation, indicated by the presence of PMEs, is present in both tumor and immune cells in high-grade serous ovarian cancer. The prognostic implication of PMEs seems to be cell type-dependent. While immune cell paucimannosylation was associated with improved survival, tumor cell paucimannosylation was associated with reduced survival.

Keywords:
  • Paucimannosylation
  • ovarian cancer
  • Mannitou antibody
  • paucimannosidic epitopes

Introduction

High grade serous ovarian cancer represents the most lethal gynecologic malignancy (1). Despite dedicated surgery, adjuvant chemotherapy and additional maintenance therapies, such as PARP-inhibitors or VEGF-antibodies, high-grade serous ovarian cancer is characterized by an evolving resistance to carboplatin and PARP-inhibitors (2-4). Therefore, it is of imminent interest to gain further insights into tumorigenesis of this disease.

Glycosylation is a frequent post-translational modification defining protein functions. Aberrant glycosylation has long been linked to carcinogenesis. Unfortunately, the functional role of altered glycosylation remains poorly understood in the clinical context (5, 6).

Paucimannose, a short mannosidic glycan has just recently been identified in humans and its presence seems to be linked to pathophysiologic conditions such as cancer and inflammation (7-10). New N-glycan datasets for lung adenocarcinoma show differences in the N-glycan profile of healthy and cancerous tissue. Paucimannose was increased at all tumor stages of lung adenocarcinoma (10). Paucimannose has also been shown to be released by activated neutrophils in pathogen-infected lungs (11). Furthermore, paucimannosidic epitopes (PMEs) seem to be enriched in cancer tissue when compared to normal tissue (10, 12). PMEs are associated with key oncogenic processes such as cell migration, invasion and proliferation. All of these processes can be blocked successfully in vitro by the Mannitou antibody. Therefore, PMEs may have a potential for diagnostic and therapeutic use (7). In the present study, we investigated the presence of PMEs in high grade serous ovarian cancer by immunohistochemistry using the research monoclonal Mannitou antibody (13, 14).

To the best of our knowledge, no data are available on the immunohistochemical detection of PMEs in high-grade serous ovarian cancer. Therefore, we aimed to address several key questions. First, we evaluated the most appropriate scoring method for assessment of staining with the Mannitou antibody. Second, we examined the potential association between Mannitou staining and disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in high-grade serous ovarian cancer. Last, we compared our immunohistochemical findings with clinically known prognostic factors such as FIGO-Stage, tumor mass described by the peritoneal cancer index (PCI) and tumor distribution (15, 16).

Patients and Methods

Data collection. This study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the ethics committee of the Faculty of Medicine at the University of Bonn, Germany (Nr: 428/22). The institutional record database was screened for patients with high-grade serous ovarian cancer treated at the Department of Gynecology and Gynecological Oncology between January 2012 and December 2020. Tissue collection was conducted within the Biobank initiative of the University of Bonn. The only inclusion criterion was the histologically confirmed diagnosis of a high-grade serous ovarian cancer. The only exclusion criterion was any histology other than high-grade serous ovarian cancer. All patients provided written informed consent before tissue collection. Baseline characteristics, pathology, therapeutic course and peritoneal cancer index were recorded from patient’s charts and surgery reports (15). Follow up data were updated in July 2022. Tumor stage was based on the 2013 revised International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) system (16).

Patients. A total of 176 patients were included in the study. A board-certified pathologist (M.M.) performed Immunohistochemical evaluation of whole-tumor slides.

Immunohistochemistry (IHC). Whole tumor slides were prepared by the Institute of Pathology of the University Hospital Bonn. Hematoxylin and eosin (HE) slides of all 176 patients were re-examined by a pathologist to confirm the diagnosis of high-grade serous ovarian cancer. In all cases, the main tumor-containing slide was identified, and fresh tissue sections (2-3 μm) were prepared from the corresponding formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue block.

For paucimannose staining, the Mannitou monoclonal mouse IgM antibody was prepared in RPMI medium as previously described (13, 14). IHC staining was performed using VECTASTAIN Elite ABC-HRP system and ImmPACT Nova Red chromogen (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA). Deparaffinized and rehydrated FFPE tissue sections were treated with Dako REAL peroxidase blocking solution (Dako, Glostrup, Denmark) followed by 5% bovine serum albumin (BSA; Neolab, Einhausen, Germany) in phosphate-buffered saline (blocking). Mannitou antibody (hybridoma supernatant diluted 1:50 in blocking solution) was added overnight at 4°C. Following incubations with secondary antibody (biotinylated anti-mouse IgM, 1:200 in blocking) and Vectastain ABC Elite reagent, paucimannose was stained with chromogen and slides were counterstained with hematoxylin. Control staining included secondary antibody control where Mannitou antibody was omitted and complete RPMI medium (1:50 in blocking) was used instead as well as preabsorption of Mannitou antibody with 0.5 M α-methyl mannoside (Sigma-Aldrich, Taufkirchen, Germany) as previously described (13, 14).

Evaluation of IHC. Tumor tissue presence was validated through visual examination of hematoxylin and eosin (HE) stained slides. At present, no validated scoring methods are available for the evaluation of paucimannosidic epitope staining using the Mannitou antibody. Therefore, we applied the following set of scoring methods to analyze the heterogeneous staining patterns. 1) Dichotomous scoring: positive versus negative staining. 2) Staining intensity graded as none [0], weak [1], moderate [2] and strong [3]. 3) Percentage of stained tumor cells. Classified by cut offs of <10% and >10%. 4) Immunoreactive score (IRS): following the method of Remmele and Stegner, staining intensity was graded as none (0), weak (1), moderate (2) and strong (3) and was multiplied with the percentage of positive cells (1:<10%, 2:11-50%, 3:51-80%, 4:>80%). Therefore, IRS score values ranged from 0-12 and were categorized into four groups: negative staining [0-1], mild staining [2-3], moderate staining [4-8] and strong staining [9-12] (17). 5) Immune cell staining: present versus absent staining in immune cells. 6) Detailed percentage of stained tumor cells categorized into 0%, 1-4%, 5-10%, 11-29%, ≥30%. 7) H-Score method: The percentages of weak, moderate and strong staining intensities are multiplied by 1 (weak staining), 2 (moderate staining) or 3 (strong staining) and subsequently summed up to the H-score with a range from 0-300 (18). 8) Hot-Spot method: Percentage of positively stained tumor cells within an area of notably higher staining intensities compared to the surrounding tumor cells (19).

Statistical analysis. Statistical analyses were performed using Minitab Version 18 (Minitab LLC., State College, PA, USA). The survival analyses for DFS and OS are based on the Kaplan–Meier method. The time-to-event intervals are described in months from the date of primary diagnosis until the date of the event. Data were censored at the date of the last follow up if there was no event. Using the log-rank test, 5-year survival curves were compared at the 95% confidence level. Mannitou staining intensity was correlated by Spearman test to FIGO stage, tumor mass (expressed as the peritoneal cancer index, PCI), tumor distribution (small bowel with/without carcinosis) and to the result of surgery (macroscopically tumor-free/residual disease).

Results

General patient characteristics. A total of 176 patients with high-grade serous epithelial ovarian cancer were included in this study. The median PCI was 13 (range=2-30). Five-year OS was 100% in stage I, 85.71% in stage II, 42.68% in stage III and 19.64% in stage IV. All general patient characteristics are depicted in Table I.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

General patient characteristics.

Staining results. In 146 patients, there was a cytoplasmic staining, in two patients there was cell membrane staining and in three patients there was a cell membrane and cytoplasmic staining. All eight sets of scoring methods described in the methods section were applied. Details are depicted in Table II. Examples of staining results are depicted in Figure 1.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table II.

Detailed staining results according to the applied scoring method.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Representative immunohistochemical staining for paucimannose in high-grade serous ovarian cancer using the Mannitou antibody. (A, B) Negative controls. (A) Tumor cells only: Pretreatment with 0.5 M α-methyl-mannoside abolished Mannitou staining (magnification ×400). (B) Tumor and immune cells: Pretreatment with 0.5 M α-methyl-mannoside abolished Mannitou staining (magnification ×200). (C, D) Immune cell staining patterns. (C) Scattered Mannitou-positive immune cells (magnification ×400). (D) Clustered Mannitou-positive immune cells (magnification ×200). (E) Tumor cell staining pattern. Hot-spot staining of >50% of tumor cells showing clustered Mannitou-positive tumor cells (magnification ×400).

Immune cell staining was associated with improved DFS and a trend toward improved OS. Only the hot spot staining of more than 50% of tumor cells could be correlated with a reduced OS. No effect on DFS was observed. None of the alternative scoring approaches were able to detect statistically significant survival differences (Table III).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table III.

Five-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) according to different staining scores applied to the IgM Mannitou immunocytochemical staining.

None of the scoring methods was able to show an association with clinical prognostic factors such as tumor load measured by the PCI or FIGO stage, or tumor distribution or surgical outcome as detailed in Table IV.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table IV.

Association of Mannitou staining with clinical factors.

Discussion

Generally, PMEs are present in high-grade serous ovarian cancer. The findings from this study indicate that PME presence in immune cells is linked to favorable outcomes, but their presence in tumor cells correlates with reduced survival. Previous research linked aberrant glycosylation to carcinogenesis decades ago. Up until today, it is still unclear whether these changes are the cause of cancer development or just a consequence of cancer development (20-23).

Paucimannose, referring to a group of N-linked glycans consisting of mannose1-3fucose0-1N-acetylglucosamine2, is a rare and uncommon type of glycosylation in humans. A potential association with cancer development was recognized just recently (8). In some tumor types, increased paucimannose levels in tumor cells were observed compared to matched normal tissues (8, 10, 12). As immunohistochemistry is the most economical and widely available method to analyze tumor materials in daily practice, we decided to screen for PME in high grade serous ovarian cancer using the research Mannitou antibody (13, 14). Generally, PMEs are linked to key cellular processes such as cell migration, invasion and proliferation. In vitro all of these processes are inhibited effectively by the Mannitou antibody (7).

Given the lack of standardized evaluation methods for immunohistochemical staining of PMEs using the Mannitou antibody, we applied various scoring systems to analyze our heterogeneous staining results. Among the patients in our cohort, tumor staining was cytoplasmic in 146 patients, membranous only in two patients and both cytoplasmic and membranous in three patients. No tumor cell staining was observed in 25 patients. In general, we observed no case of nuclear or extracellular PME-staining.

Only the hot spot scoring method was suitable to detect survival differences in our cohort (19). In detail, a hot spot staining of tumor cells of more than 50% was associated with a worse OS. Kaprio et al. linked elevated Paucimannose levels to a poor prognosis in advanced colorectal carcinoma (24). Therefore, we investigated a potential association between established clinical prognostic factors in high-grade serous ovarian cancer – such as tumor load, FIGO-Stage or tumor distribution – and the levels of paucimannose in tumor cells and immune cells. Furthermore, we included carcinomatosis of the small bowel which is considered a clinical marker for poor prognosis, indicating an aggressive tumor biology (25, 26). Unfortunately, we were not able to detect any significant association of paucimannosylation and clinical prognostic factors by applying the eight different scoring methods.

In prostate cancer, glycosylation gene signatures and glycosylation-specific antibodies seem to be closely associated with tumor biology and may serve as potential biomarkers for risk stratification (22). Generally, glycosylation contributes to many hallmarks of cancer such as avoiding immune destruction, promoting tumor inflammation and resistance to growth suppression (22). One example is the highly selective macrophage mannose receptor CD206, which plays a significant role within the innate immune system promoting tumor growth and metastases when recognizing glycosylated structures on tumor cells (23). In this context, our finding of a paucimannosidic epitope staining in immune cells in109 patients (61.93%) was very interesting. Especially its association with improved survival.

According to our findings in high-grade serous ovarian cancer, paucimannosylation in immune cells, defined by immunohistochemical staining, may be used as biomarker and indicator of a more favorable prognosis, while paucimannosylation of tumor cells is indicative of a poor prognosis.

However, the specific cell origin and specific function of PMEs has yet to be determined. Furthermore, the underlying mechanism of the differential presence of paucimannosylation in certain cells is still unknown. It is assumed that PMEs are present in and can be released from lysosomes or lysosome-like departments (11, 12). They may derive either from tumor cells or other surrounding cells such as immune cells. Further studies elucidating the specific cellular origin of PMEs are therefore of high interest and may contribute to obtaining further insights into tumor biology.

Our study has several limitations such as its retrospective design and the single center analysis. Nevertheless, as our study only focused on patients with high-grade serous ovarian cancer, a very homogenous cohort of patients was analyzed. Furthermore, this is the first study presenting a potential scoring method for the analysis of paucimannosylation in high-grade serous ovarian cancer using immunohistochemistry. In addition, this study is the first to demonstrate the cell-dependent prognostic implication of PMEs in high-grade ovarian cancer.

Conclusion

In conclusion, our data provides evidence that paucimannosylation is present in high-grade serous ovarian cancer and its prognostic impact seems to depend on its presence in a specific cell type. Our results indicate that PMEs in high-grade serous ovarian cancer may represent a prognostic biomarker. PMEs might serve as potential target for future studies to improve therapeutic strategies.

Acknowledgements

Mannitou hybridoma cells provided by Dr. Simone Diestel; Mannitou generation with the help of Yvonne Becker (both Institute of Nutrition and Food Sciences, University of Bonn, Bonn, 53127, Germany). Tissue slides preparation: Carsten Golletz and Christiane Esch (both Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Bonn).

Footnotes

  • Authors’ Contributions

    Conceptualization: Sarah Foerster, Methodology: Michael Muders. Formal analysis: Eva K. Egger. Investigation: Sarah Föerster, Lina Adloff, Michael Muders, Thore Thiesler. Validation: Michael Muders. Writing Original Draft Preparation: Eva K. Egger. Writing-Review and Editing Preparation: Sarah Foerster, Milka Marinova, Alexander Mustea, Luzia A. Otten, Carolin Schröder; Michale Muders, Dominique Könsgen. Supervision: Michael Muders. All Authors read and approved of the final manuscript.

  • Conflicts of Interest

    All Authors declare no conflicts of interest in relation to this study.

  • Funding

    There was no external funding.

  • Artificial Intelligence (AI) Disclosure

    No artificial intelligence (AI) tools, including large language models or machine learning software, were used in the preparation, analysis, or presentation of this manuscript.

  • Received August 21, 2025.
  • Revision received October 7, 2025.
  • Accepted October 9, 2025.
  • Copyright © 2026 The Author(s). Published by the International Institute of Anticancer Research.

This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Sung H,
    2. Ferlay J,
    3. Siegel RL,
    4. Laversanne M,
    5. Soerjomataram I,
    6. Jemal A,
    7. Bray F
    : Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin 71(3): 209-249, 2021. DOI: 10.3322/CAAC.21660
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Perren TJ,
    2. Swart AM,
    3. Pfisterer J,
    4. Ledermann JA,
    5. Pujade-Lauraine E,
    6. Kristensen G,
    7. Carey MS,
    8. Beale P,
    9. Cervantes A,
    10. Kurzeder C,
    11. du Bois A,
    12. Sehouli J,
    13. Kimmig R,
    14. Stähle A,
    15. Collinson F,
    16. Essapen S,
    17. Gourley C,
    18. Lortholary A,
    19. Selle F,
    20. Mirza MR,
    21. Leminen A,
    22. Plante M,
    23. Stark D,
    24. Qian W,
    25. Parmar MK,
    26. Oza AM, ICON7 Investigators
    : A phase 3 trial of bevacizumab in ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med 365(26): 2484-2496, 2011. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMOA1103799
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Harter P,
    2. Mouret-Reynier MA,
    3. Pignata S,
    4. Cropet C,
    5. González-Martín A,
    6. Bogner G,
    7. Fujiwara K,
    8. Vergote I,
    9. Colombo N,
    10. Nøttrup TJ,
    11. Floquet A,
    12. El-Balat A,
    13. Scambia G,
    14. Guerra Alia EM,
    15. Fabbro M,
    16. Schmalfeldt B,
    17. Hardy-Bessard AC,
    18. Runnebaum I,
    19. Pujade-Lauraine E,
    20. Ray-Coquard I
    : Efficacy of maintenance olaparib plus bevacizumab according to clinical risk in patients with newly diagnosed, advanced ovarian cancer in the phase III PAOLA-1/ENGOT-ov25 trial. Gynecol Oncol 164(2): 254-264, 2022. DOI: 10.1016/J.YGYNO.2021.12.016
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Harter P,
    2. Petran D,
    3. Scambia G,
    4. Ortega E,
    5. Tsibulak I,
    6. Nagao S,
    7. Vergote I,
    8. Meunier J,
    9. Priou F,
    10. Sverdlin R,
    11. Milenkova T,
    12. Ray-Coquard I
    : Efficacy of maintenance olaparib plus bevacizumab by biomarker status in clinical higher and lower risk patients with newly diagnosed, advanced ovarian cancer in the PAOLA-1/ENGPT-ov25 trial. Int J Gynecol Cancer 30(Suppl 3): A13-A14, 2020. DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-IGCS.18
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Zhang M,
    2. Cheng S,
    3. Jin Y,
    4. Zhao Y,
    5. Wang Y
    : Roles of CA125 in diagnosis, prediction, and oncogenesis of ovarian cancer. Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer 1875(2): 188503, 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2021.188503
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  5. ↵
    1. Giamougiannis P,
    2. Martin-Hirsch PL,
    3. Martin FL
    : The evolving role of MUC16 (CA125) in the transformation of ovarian cells and the progression of neoplasia. Carcinogenesis 42(3): 327-343, 2021. DOI: 10.1093/carcin/bgab010
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Venkatakrishnan V,
    2. Thaysen-Andersen M,
    3. Chen SCA,
    4. Nevalainen H,
    5. Packer NH
    : Cystic fibrosis and bacterial colonization define the sputum N-glycosylation phenotype. Glycobiology 25(1): 88-100, 2015. DOI: 10.1093/glycob/cwu092
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Balog CI,
    2. Stavenhagen K,
    3. Fung WL,
    4. Koeleman CA,
    5. McDonnell LA,
    6. Verhoeven A,
    7. Mesker WE,
    8. Tollenaar RA,
    9. Deelder AM,
    10. Wuhrer M
    : N-glycosylation of colorectal cancer tissues: a liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry-based investigation. Mol Cell Proteomics 11(9): 571-585, 2012. DOI: 10.1074/mcp.M111.011601
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Becker Y,
    2. Förster S,
    3. Gielen GH,
    4. Loke I,
    5. Thaysen-Andersen M,
    6. Laurini C,
    7. Wehrand K,
    8. Pietsch T,
    9. Diestel S
    : Paucimannosidic glycoepitopes inhibit tumorigenic processes in glioblastoma multiforme. Oncotarget 10(43): 4449-4465, 2019. DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.27056
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Lattová E,
    2. Skřičková J,
    3. Hausnerová J,
    4. Frola L,
    5. Křen L,
    6. Ihnatová I,
    7. Zdráhal Z,
    8. Bryant J,
    9. Popovič M
    : N-Glycan profiling of lung adenocarcinoma in patients at different stages of disease. Mod Pathol 33(6): 1146-1156, 2020. DOI: 10.1038/s41379-019-0441-3
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Thaysen-Andersen M,
    2. Venkatakrishnan V,
    3. Loke I,
    4. Laurini C,
    5. Diestel S,
    6. Parker BL,
    7. Packer NH
    : Human neutrophils secrete bioactive paucimannosidic proteins from azurophilic granules into pathogen-infected sputum. J Biol Chem 290(14): 8789-8802, 2015. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M114.631622
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. Chatterjee S,
    2. Lee LY,
    3. Kawahara R,
    4. Abrahams JL,
    5. Adamczyk B,
    6. Anugraham M,
    7. Ashwood C,
    8. Sumer-Bayraktar Z,
    9. Briggs MT,
    10. Chik JHL,
    11. Everest-Dass A,
    12. Förster S,
    13. Hinneburg H,
    14. Leite KRM,
    15. Loke I,
    16. Möginger U,
    17. Moh ESX,
    18. Nakano M,
    19. Recuero S,
    20. Sethi MK,
    21. Srougi M,
    22. Stavenhagen K,
    23. Venkatakrishnan V,
    24. Wongtrakul-Kish K,
    25. Diestel S,
    26. Hoffmann P,
    27. Karlsson NG,
    28. Kolarich D,
    29. Molloy MP,
    30. Muders MH,
    31. Oehler MK,
    32. Packer NH,
    33. Palmisano G,
    34. Thaysen-Andersen M
    : Protein paucimannosylation is an enriched N-glycosylation signature of human cancers. Proteomics 19(21-22): e1900010, 2019. DOI: 10.1002/pmic.201900010
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Zipser B,
    2. Bello-DeOcampo D,
    3. Diestel S,
    4. Tai MH,
    5. Schmitz B
    : Mannitou monoclonal antibody uniquely recognizes paucimannose, a marker for human cancer, stemness, and inflammation. J Carbohydrate Chem 31(4–6): 504-518, 2012. DOI: 10.1080/07328303.2012.661112
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  12. ↵
    1. Dahmen AC,
    2. Fergen MT,
    3. Laurini C,
    4. Schmitz B,
    5. Loke I,
    6. Thaysen-Andersen M,
    7. Diestel S
    : Paucimannosidic glycoepitopes are functionally involved in proliferation of neural progenitor cells in the subventricular zone. Glycobiology 25(8): 869-880, 2015. DOI: 10.1093/glycob/cwv027
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Jacquet P,
    2. Sugarbaker PH
    : Clinical research methodologies in diagnosis and staging of patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis. Cancer Treat Res 82: 359-374, 1996. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4613-1247-5_23
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Prat J
    : Staging classification for cancer of the ovary, fallopian tube, and peritoneum. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 124(1): 1-5, 2014. DOI: 10.1016/J.IJGO.2013.10.001
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Remmele W,
    2. Stegner HE
    : [Recommendation for uniform definition of an immunoreactive score (IRS) for immunohistochemical estrogen receptor detection (ER-ICA) in breast cancer tissue]. Pathologe 8(3): 138-1403303008, 1987.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Budwit-Novotny DA,
    2. McCarty KS,
    3. Cox EB,
    4. Soper JT,
    5. Mutch DG,
    6. Creasman WT,
    7. Flowers JL,
    8. McCarty KS Jr.
    : Immunohistochemical analyses of estrogen receptor in endometrial adenocarcinoma using a monoclonal antibody. Cancer Res 46(10): 5419-5425, 1986.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    1. Jang MH,
    2. Kim HJ,
    3. Chung YR,
    4. Lee Y,
    5. Park SY
    : A comparison of Ki-67 counting methods in luminal breast cancer: the average method vs. the hot spot method. PLoS One 12(2): e0172031, 2017. DOI: 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0172031
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Lemjabbar-Alaoui H,
    2. McKinney A,
    3. Yang YW,
    4. Tran VM,
    5. Phillips JJ
    : Glycosylation alterations in lung and brain cancer. Adv Cancer Res 126: 305-344, 2015. DOI: 10.1016/bs.acr.2014.11.007
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Meldgaard M,
    2. Svendsen L
    : Different effects of N-glycosylation on the thermostability of highly homologous bacterial (1,3-1,4)-beta-glucanases secreted from yeast. Microbiology (Reading) 140(Pt 1): 159-166, 1994. DOI: 10.1099/13500872-140-1-159
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Munkley J,
    2. Elliott DJ
    : Hallmarks of glycosylation in cancer. Oncotarget 7(23): 35478-35489, 2016. DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.8155
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Varki A,
    2. Kannagi R,
    3. Toole B,
    4. Stanley P
    : Glycosylation changes in cancer. essentials of glycobiology. 3rd Edition. Cold Spring Harbor, NY, USA, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 2015-2017.
  21. ↵
    1. Kaprio T,
    2. Satomaa T,
    3. Heiskanen A,
    4. Hokke CH,
    5. Deelder AM,
    6. Mustonen H,
    7. Hagström J,
    8. Carpen O,
    9. Saarinen J,
    10. Haglund C
    : N-glycomic profiling as a tool to separate rectal adenomas from carcinomas. Mol Cell Proteomics 14(2): 277-288, 2015. DOI: 10.1074/mcp.M114.041632
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    1. Heitz F,
    2. Harter P,
    3. Alesina PF,
    4. Walz MK,
    5. Lorenz D,
    6. Groeben H,
    7. Heikaus S,
    8. Fisseler-Eckhoff A,
    9. Schneider S,
    10. Ataseven B,
    11. Kurzeder C,
    12. Prader S,
    13. Beutel B,
    14. Traut A,
    15. du Bois A
    : Pattern of and reason for postoperative residual disease in patients with advanced ovarian cancer following upfront radical debulking surgery. Gynecol Oncol 141(2): 264-270, 2016. DOI: 10.1016/J.YGYNO.2016.03.015
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Rosendahl M,
    2. Harter P,
    3. Bjørn SF,
    4. Høgdall C
    : Specific regions, rather than the entire peritoneal carcinosis index, are predictive of complete resection and survival in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 28(2): 316-322, 2018. DOI: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000001173
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research: 46 (1)
Anticancer Research
Vol. 46, Issue 1
January 2026
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Paucimannosylation Is a Prognostic Marker in High-grade Serous Ovarian Cancer
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
14 + 2 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Paucimannosylation Is a Prognostic Marker in High-grade Serous Ovarian Cancer
EVA EGGER, SARAH FÖRSTER, LINA ADLOFF, MILKA MARINOVA, LUCIA A. OTTEN, CAROLIN SCHRÖDER, DOMINIQUE KÖNSGEN, ALEXANDER MUSTEA, THORE THIESLER, MICHAEL MUDERS
Anticancer Research Jan 2026, 46 (1) 85-94; DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.17925

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Paucimannosylation Is a Prognostic Marker in High-grade Serous Ovarian Cancer
EVA EGGER, SARAH FÖRSTER, LINA ADLOFF, MILKA MARINOVA, LUCIA A. OTTEN, CAROLIN SCHRÖDER, DOMINIQUE KÖNSGEN, ALEXANDER MUSTEA, THORE THIESLER, MICHAEL MUDERS
Anticancer Research Jan 2026, 46 (1) 85-94; DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.17925
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Patients and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Acknowledgements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Ginsenoside Rd Improves Anticancer Drug-induced Disturbance in Murine Airway Ciliary Motility
  • Association of Matrix Metalloproteinase-11 Genotypes With Taiwan Gastric Cancer Risk and Clinical Features
  • Methionine Restriction, Not Cysteine Restriction, Is a Cancer-specific Vulnerability
Show more Experimental Studies

Keywords

  • Paucimannosylation
  • ovarian cancer
  • Mannitou antibody
  • paucimannosidic epitopes
Anticancer Research

© 2026 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire