Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues 2025
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues 2025
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleClinical Studies
Open Access

Psychological Stress Versus Outcome in Patients With Breast Disease and Breast Cancer: A Prospective 25-year Follow-up Study in Patients With Breast Cancer Symptoms

MATTI ESKELINEN, RIIKA KOSKELA, TUOMAS SELANDER, KAI KAARNIRANTA, PAULA OLLONEN and MAARET ESKELINEN
Anticancer Research September 2025, 45 (9) 3817-3826; DOI: https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.17741
MATTI ESKELINEN
1Department of Surgery, Kuopio University Hospital (KUH) and School of Medicine, University of Eastern Finland (UEF), Kuopio, Finland;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: matti.eskelinen{at}kuh.fi
RIIKA KOSKELA
2Department of Anaesthesiology, KUH and School of Medicine, UEF, Kuopio, Finland;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
TUOMAS SELANDER
3Science Service Center, KUH, Kuopio, Finland;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
KAI KAARNIRANTA
4Department of Ophthalmology, KUH and School of Medicine, UEF, Kuopio, Finland;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
PAULA OLLONEN
5Department of Psychiatry, KUH and School of Medicine, UEF, Kuopio, Finland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MAARET ESKELINEN
1Department of Surgery, Kuopio University Hospital (KUH) and School of Medicine, University of Eastern Finland (UEF), Kuopio, Finland;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background/Aim: This study evaluated whether a psychological inventory (Forsen inventory, FI) for measuring the severity of psychological stress (PS) could predict long-term outcomes in patients having breast carcinoma (BC) symptoms.

Patients and Methods: A total of 115 patients with BC symptoms completed the FI scale and associations between FI scale and long-term outcomes were analysed using survival models.

Results: The FI scores correlated with Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) (r=0.678, p<0.001), Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) (r=0.820, p<0.001), and State-Trait Anxiety inventory (STAI) (r=0.556, p<0.001) levels. In Cox regression models, higher FI scores predicted poorer 25-year relapse-free survival (RFS) in BC patients (HR=2.60, p=0.05) and poorer 25-year overall survival (OS) in patients with benign breast disease (BBD) (HR=7.79, p=0.05). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed significantly better 25-year RFS among BC patients with low FI scores (<14) compared to those with high scores (≥14) (58.3% vs. 30.0%, p=0.046), and higher 25-year OS in BBD patients with low FI scores (95.8% vs. 71.4%, p=0.022).

Conclusion: The FI scale, though underutilized, effectively captures PS and significantly predicts long-term outcomes in patients with breast disease. These findings suggest that incorporating the FI into diagnostic evaluations could enhance risk stratification and management for women with BC symptoms.

Keywords:
  • Psychological stress
  • Forsen scale
  • breast cancer symptoms
  • long-term outcome

Introduction

Breast carcinoma (BC) is the most common carcinoma in women (1-5) and one of the main public health problems worldwide. Early diagnosis and treatment of women with BC represents significant health-care costs and has a substantial impact on the psychological health of women. Various BC risk factors (RFs), many of which are related to features of woman’s reproductive life, hormone physiology and life-style, have been identified (6). Therefore, BC is considered a multifactorial hormone-dependent disease that may arise from the combination of genetic, environmental, hormonal, and lifestyle factors that make women susceptible to BC (6). The RFs for BC are closely associated with the outcome and therefore assessing possible RFs for BC has been the main focus for both the prevention and early diagnosis of BC (7). Although numerous RFs have been identified, substantial gaps remain in our current knowledge of the role psychological stress (PS) plays in the etiology of BC (8). The PS events are widely thought to play a role as ‘secondary’ RFs of BC, because PS could have a less pronounced connection to outcome, and would thus not necessarily be identified as RF in some studies (8). However, a positive association between PS and BC was observed in two cohort studies (9, 10) as well as in some case-control studies (11-15). Ollonen et al. (14) conducted a case-control study of PS in women with BC symptoms admitted to BC diagnostic unit (BCDU). Their results indicated that patients with BC versus women with non-BC had significantly more severe PS in the previous 10 years preceding the investigation. Authors concluded that the findings of their study support an overall association between PS and BC risk.

The findings from the above-mentioned studies motivated us to conduct the current study with the aim of searching for an association between the features of PS detected with the Forsen psychological inventory (FI) versus the 25-year relapse-free survival (RFS) and the overall survival (OS) in women diagnosed in BCDU. To date, no studies have evaluated the impact of PS factors using the FI in relation to patient outcomes through survival model analysis.

Patients and Methods

Patients. The study cohort included 115 patients with BC symptoms diagnosed in BCDU, KUH, Finland, of whom 34 (29.6%) were patients with BC and 81 non-BC patients (70.4%) (Table I). The detailed description of the study protocol is shown in earlier reports by Ollonen et al. (14, 16-18).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

Baseline characteristics and mean psychological scale scores in patients with breast symptoms.

Forsen inventory (FI) for psychological stress (PS). All patients completed the FI with 11 variables listed in Table II and each variable classified into three grades: grade 0, no PS symptoms; grade 1, moderate PS symptoms and grade 2, severe PS symptoms. A detailed description of the FI protocol is shown in earlier report (19).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table II.

Severity of psychological stress (PS) symptoms assessed by the Forsen inventory across three study groups. Each variable is divided into three grades: grade 0, no psychological stress symptoms; grade 1, moderate PS symptoms; and grade 2, severe PS symptoms.

Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). A detailed description of the BDI score protocol is shown in earlier reports (20-22).

Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). A detailed description of the MADRS score protocol is shown in earlier reports (23-25).

Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety inventory (STAI). A detailed description of the STAI score protocol is shown in earlier reports (26, 27).

Statistical analysis. Baseline group differences were analysed using two-sided chi-square and non-parametric Kruskall-Wallis tests. RFS was calculated from the time of diagnosis to the occurrence of the first relapse, contralateral BC, or metastatic disease. OS was assessed as the time from the date of diagnosis to the date of last follow-up or death of the patient. The effect of the FI score on the RFS and OS were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and the difference between the groups was assessed using the log-rank test. The p-values and the hazard ratios (HRs) with their 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using the Cox proportional hazard models. Pearson’s method was used to test for correlation between FI scores and STAI, BDI and MADRS scale values. Data were analyzed using the IBM SPSS statistical software (IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 26.0, IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA).

Results

BDI, MADRS, STAI and FI scales in BC and non-BC patients. The baseline data and mean score values of BDI, MADRS, STAI and FI scales in three study groups HSP, BBD and BC are presented in Table I. The mean BDI, MADRS, STAI and FI scale (0-2 years) values between BC and non-BC patients were quite similar (p=0.70, 0.78, 0.29 and 0.99, respectively, Table I). The mean FI score (2-6 years) values were slightly higher in non-BC patients (HSP=12.5 and BBD=11.8) versus BC patients (9.8, p=0.43, Table I). The FI scale levels correlated significantly with BDI scale levels (r=0.678, p<0.001, Figure 1), MADRS (r=0.820, p<0.001, Figure 2) and STAI scale levels (r=0.556, p<0.001, Figure 3).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Scatter plot of Forsen inventory (FI) score levels (0-2 years pre-diagnosis) versus Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) score levels in patients with breast symptoms (r=0.678, p<0.001).

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Scatter plot of Forsen inventory (FI) score levels (0-2 years pre-diagnosis) versus Montgomery-Asberg depression rating scale (MADRS) score levels in patients with breast symptoms (r=0.841, p<0.001).

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

Scatter plot of Forsen inventory (FI) score levels (0-2 years pre-diagnosis) versus state-trait anxiety inventory (STAI) score levels in patients with breast symptoms (r=0.556, p<0.001).

FI variables in BC and non-BC patients. The eleven FI variables during the prodromal periods in non-BC (HSP, BBD) and BC patients classified into three grades are shown in Table II. The women with BC had slightly more severe anxiety and severe headaches compared to non-BC women (12% and 18% versus 5% and 9%, respectively, Table II). In addition, the patients with BC also had slightly more severe tiredness than the non-BC patients during the six-year prodromal period (16% versus 11%, Table II).

The 25-year RFS and OS. In the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis using the log-rank test the FI scale predicted the long-term RFS in patients with BC (Table III). The 25-year RFS differed significantly between low FI score (<14) and high FI score (≥14) patients with BC (58.3% versus 30%, log-rank p-value=0.046, Figure 4). Additionally, in the Cox analysis, the low FI score (<14) was a significant favourable predictor of the RFS (HR=2.60, 95%CI=0.98-6.88, p=0.05, Table III) in patients with BC. A similar pattern was observed in BBD patients as the FI score predicted 25-year OS in women with BBD (Table IV). The 25-year OS rate differed significantly between low FI score (<14) and high FI score (≥14) BBD patients (95.8% versus 71.4%, log-rank p-value=0.022, Figure 5). Also, in the Cox regression analysis the low FI score (<14) was a significant favourable predictor of the OS (HR=7.79, 95%CI=0.97-62.3, p=0.05, Table IV) in patients with BBD. In all patients, the 25-year OS rate differed also between those with low FI scores (<14) and those with high FI scores (≥14), although the difference did not reach statistical significance (77.6% versus 61.4%, log-rank p-value=0.069) (Figure 6).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table III.

Association between Forsen Inventory (FI) Score and 25-year relapse-free survival (RFS). RFS rates and hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) in relation to FI scores across healthy symptomatic patients (HSP), patients with benign breast disease (BBD), and patients with breast cancer (BC) using Cox proportional hazards models.

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

The Kaplan-Meier survival curves for relapse-free survival (RFS) in patients with breast cancer (n=34) according to Forsen inventory (FI) scale (2-6 years pre-diagnosis). The FI score was a continuous variable in the analysis of the study patients. The FI score had a statistically significant effect on RFS according to the log-rank test (p=0.046).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table IV.

Association between Forsen Inventory (FI) Score and 25-year overall survival (OS). OS rates and hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) across healthy symptomatic patients (HSP), patients with benign breast disease (BBD), and patients with breast cancer (BC) stratified by FI score categories using Cox proportional hazards models.

Figure 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 5.

The Kaplan-Meier survival curves for overall survival (OS) in patients with benign breast disease (BBD) (n=54) according to Forsen inventory (FI) scale (0-2 years pre-diagnosis). The total FI score was a continuous variable in the analysis of the study patients. The FI score had a statistically significant effect on RFS according to the log-rank test (p=0.022).

Figure 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 6.

The Kaplan-Meier survival curves for overall survival (OS) in patients with breast symptoms (n=115) according to Forsen inventory (FI) scale (0-2 years pre-diagnosis). The total Forsen score was a continuous variable in the analysis of the study patients. The FI score had almost statistically significant effect on RFS according to the log-rank test (p=0.069).

Discussion

The RFs for BC are closely associated with the outcome and therefore assessing possible RFs for BC has been the main aim for both the prevention and early diagnosis of BC (7). Although several RFs have been identified, substantial gaps remain in current knowledge of the effect of PS factors on the etiology of BC (8). Interestingly, a positive association between PS and BC was observed in two cohort studies (9, 10) and in several case-control studies (11-15). Helgesson et al. (9) studied self-reported PS levels in a cohort of Swedish women. Authors found that women with BC reporting PS during the five years preceding diagnosis had a two-fold higher rate of BC compared with women reporting no PS (HR= 2.1; 95%CI=1.2-3.7).

Lillberg et al. (10) investigated PS as a risk of BC in women from the Finnish Twin Study cohort. PS events and RFs of BC were assessed by self-administered questionnaire. The HR for BC was 1.35 (95%CI=1.09-1.67), when major life events were considered. Independently of total life events, divorce/separation (HR=2.26, 95%CI=1.25-4.07), death of a husband (HR=2.00, 95%CI=1.03-3.88), and death of a close relative or friend (HR=1.36, 95%CI=1.00-1.86) were all associated with increased risk of BC.

Forsen (11) assessed PS events preceding BC diagnosis in a case-control study of women with BC symptoms. The control group of women was selected from the general female population and matched for sex, age and number of child-births. The findings showed that patients with BC had significantly more PS events, important losses, and difficult life situations prior BC diagnosis. Their analysis indicated that important losses during a 6-year prodromal period of BC diagnosis were associated with enhanced BC risk. The association persisted after adjustment for marital status, education, and social class.

Chen et al. (12) performed a case-control study with 119 women, who were referred for biopsy of a suspicious breast lesion (BC=41 and non-BC=78). Authors reported that PS events increased the risk of BC three-fold (HR=3.2, 95%CI=1.35-7.6). After adjustment for age, menopause and other potential confounders, the HR for BC rose almost 4-fold (HR=11.6, 95%CI=3.1-43.7). However, non-severe life events and long-term difficulties had no significant association with enhanced BC risk. The authors concluded that there is significant association between PS events and risk of BC.

Kruk et al. (13) assessed, in a case-control study, whether PS could enhance BC risk. The women in their study filled a questionnaire including questions on lifetime physical activity, diet, reproductive history and experience of PS. The women in their study reported PS events, stress of daily activity and experience of stress at work. After adjustment for age and other potential confounders, the authors found that women with PS events, stress of daily activity and depression had significantly higher risk for BC (HR=3.70; 95%CI=2.61-5.26). The authors concluded that their findings suggest an association between PS events and BC risk. The same authors (15) also studied the association of severe life events with the risk of BC. Their case-control study was based on examination of patients with BC and women matched for age and place of residence as controls. Data on PS events, reproductive factors and lifestyle habits were collected using a self-administered questionnaire. After adjustment for potential RFs for BC, women with four to six PS events had 5.33 times higher risk for BC, compared with women in the lowest quartile of PS events. Several PS events (death of a close family member, personal injury or illness, imprisonment/trouble with the law, retirement) were significantly associated with BC risk. These findings suggest that major life events can play an important role in the etiology of BC.

Ollonen et al. (14) conducted a case-control study of PS events in women with BC symptoms admitted to BCDU and they completed BDI, MADRS and STAI questionnaires. The women with BC reported clearly enhanced PS (p =0.02) and more losses (p<0.001) in comparison to non-BC patients. Their results indicated that patients with BC had significantly more severe PS events in the previous 10 years preceding the diagnosis compared to non-BC women. The authors concluded that a severe PS load and significant personal losses could significantly enhance BC risk. The same authors also studied the PS events, psychiatric medications and the risk of BC in 115 women with BC symptoms before any diagnostic procedures (19). This study might indicate a weak association between PS events detected with the FI scale and risk of BC. Unfortunately, the cohort of patients with psychiatric medications was too small to detect a link between medications and increased BC risk (19).

The findings from the above-mentioned studies motivated us to conduct the current study with the aim of searching for an association between PS events detected with FI scoring and the 25-year outcome with RFS and OS in women with BC symptoms diagnosed in BCDU. No previous studies are available where the outcome of the PS events with the FI approach had been estimated using survival models.

Taken together, the aim was to investigate the characteristics of the PS events detected with the FI model in women with BC symptoms and to report their association with outcome. The results showed that the PS events detected with the FI scale correlate with the 25-year RFS and OS in women with BC symptoms. The present data indicate that the FI scale seem to have the potential to enhance the diagnostic accuracy (DA) of the PS testing in women with BC symptoms.

Different types of environmental stress, including PS, affect organisms every day, sometimes resulting in substantial detrimental changes in the functioning of living cells (28, 29). Exposure to different stressors can trigger molecular and cellular processes that underlie DNA and protein damage, oxidative stress, and energy metabolism disturbances, all of which may contribute to the development and progression of BC (28, 29). This article draws attention to the problem of cancer-related PS and proposes a novel FI scale approach for patients with BC symptoms. Even though the PS in patients with BC symptoms during their visit at BCDU seems to be rather negative, the PS-related neuroendocrine, metabolic and immune reactions during BCDU-visit remains unclear (30, 31). However, recently published studies demonstrated increased plasma levels of the biomarkers of oxidative stress glutathione peroxidase and superoxide dismutase (SOD1) following surgery in patients with cancer and benign disease (32, 33). In addition, Kärkkäinen et al. (34) reported enhanced SOD1 plasma levels post-surgery in gallstone patients, while Saimanen et al. (35) assessed cell damage, oxidative stress, and inflammation by measuring the plasma concentration of the nitrosative stress biomarker nitrotyrosine (NT) in patients with gallstone disease and cancer. Although, this study seems to be significant in the light of a comprehensive analysis of PS in patients with BC symptoms, more attention should be paid on the PS during the visit at BCDU. Diagnosis and treatment of patients with BC should be accompanied by appropriate PS testing and psychological support to prevent the negative impact of PS on the psychological health of women with BC symptoms (36, 37). In addition to PS testing, analysis of modern omics-based blood biomarkers may open new ways to understand the connection of PS with BC development and progression in the future (38-40).

Conclusion

Early diagnosis and treatment of women with BC represents significant health-care costs and has a substantial impact on the psychological health of women. Various RFs of BC have been identified, many of which are related to woman’s reproductive life, hormone physiology, and life-style. To date, the studies assessing the effect of PS events on the outcome of women with BC have not used the FI scale. Until now, the lack of long follow-up time of women with BC has delayed the advance in survival model calculations. The follow-up of women with BC symptoms enables us to detect the 25-year outcome and to assess the association of RFS and OS with PS events detected with the FI scale using survival models. The present study showed that the PS events detected with the FI scale significantly correlate to the 25-year RFS in patients with BC and 25-year OS in patients with BBD. Therefore, the use of the FI scale detecting PS events should be considered as a useful part of the diagnostic decision tree of patients with BC symptoms.

Footnotes

  • Authors’ Contributions

    All Authors contributed to the collection and analysis of data, drafting and revising the manuscript, and read and approved the final article.

  • Conflicts of Interest

    The Authors report no conflicts of interest or financial ties regarding this study.

  • Artificial Intelligence (AI) Disclosure

    No AI tools, including large language models or machine learning software were used in the preparation, analysis or presentation of this manuscript.

  • Received May 30, 2025.
  • Revision received June 16, 2025.
  • Accepted June 17, 2025.
  • Copyright © 2025 The Author(s). Published by the International Institute of Anticancer Research.

This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Torre LA,
    2. Islami F,
    3. Siegel RL,
    4. Ward EM,
    5. Jemal A
    : Global cancer in women: burden and trends. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 26(4): 444-457, 2017. DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-16-0858
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. El Haji H,
    2. Sbihi N,
    3. Guermah B,
    4. Souadka A,
    5. Ghogho M
    : Epidemiological breast cancer prediction by country: A novel machine learning approach. PLoS One 19(8): e0308905, 2024. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308905
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. GBD 2021 Demographics Collaborators
    : Global age-sex-specific mortality, life expectancy, and population estimates in 204 countries and territories and 811 subnational locations, 1950-2021, and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic: a comprehensive demographic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Lancet 403(10440): 1989-2056, 2024. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)00476-8
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. GBD 2021 Causes of Death Collaborators
    : Global burden of 288 causes of death and life expectancy decomposition in 204 countries and territories and 811 subnational locations, 1990-2021: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Lancet 403(10440): 2100-2132, 2024. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)00367-2
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. GBD 2021 Diseases and Injuries Collaborators
    : Global incidence, prevalence, years lived with disability (YLDs), disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs), and healthy life expectancy (HALE) for 371 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories and 811 subnational locations, 1990-2021: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Lancet 403(10440): 2133-2161, 2024. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)00757-8
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  3. ↵
    1. Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer
    : Alcohol, tobacco and breast cancer--collaborative reanalysis of individual data from 53 epidemiological studies, including 58,515 women with breast cancer and 95,067 women without the disease. Br J Cancer 87(11): 1234-1245, 2002. DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6600596
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Pashayan N,
    2. Antoniou AC,
    3. Ivanus U,
    4. Esserman LJ,
    5. Easton DF,
    6. French D,
    7. Sroczynski G,
    8. Hall P,
    9. Cuzick J,
    10. Evans DG,
    11. Simard J,
    12. Garcia-Closas M,
    13. Schmutzler R,
    14. Wegwarth O,
    15. Pharoah P,
    16. Moorthie S,
    17. De Montgolfier S,
    18. Baron C,
    19. Herceg Z,
    20. Turnbull C,
    21. Balleyguier C,
    22. Rossi PG,
    23. Wesseling J,
    24. Ritchie D,
    25. Tischkowitz M,
    26. Broeders M,
    27. Reisel D,
    28. Metspalu A,
    29. Callender T,
    30. de Koning H,
    31. Devilee P,
    32. Delaloge S,
    33. Schmidt MK,
    34. Widschwendter M
    : Personalized early detection and prevention of breast cancer: ENVISION consensus statement. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 17(11): 687-705, 2020. DOI: 10.1038/s41571-020-0388-9
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Bowen DJ,
    2. Fernandez Poole S,
    3. White M,
    4. Lyn R,
    5. Flores DA,
    6. Haile HG,
    7. Williams DR
    : The role of stress in breast cancer incidence: risk factors, interventions, and directions for the future. Int J Environ Res Public Health 18(4): 1871, 2021. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18041871
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Helgesson Ö,
    2. Cabrera C,
    3. Lapidus L,
    4. Bengtsson C,
    5. Lissner L
    : Self-reported stress levels predict subsequent breast cancer in a cohort of Swedish women. Eur J Cancer Prev 12(5): 377-381, 2003. DOI: 10.1097/00008469-200310000-00006
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Lillberg K,
    2. Verkasalo PK,
    3. Kaprio J,
    4. Teppo L,
    5. Helenius H,
    6. Koskenvuo M
    : Stressful life events and risk of breast cancer in 10,808 women: a cohort study. Am J Epidemiol 157(5): 415-423, 2003. DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwg002
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Forsén A
    : Psychosocial stress as a risk for breast cancer. Psychother Psychosom 55(2-4): 176-185, 1991. DOI: 10.1159/000288427
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Chen CC,
    2. David AS,
    3. Nunnerley H,
    4. Michell M,
    5. Dawson JL,
    6. Berry H,
    7. Dobbs J,
    8. Fahy T
    : Adverse life events and breast cancer: case-control study. BMJ 311(7019): 1527-1530, 1995. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.311.7019.1527
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. Kruk J,
    2. Aboul-Enein HY
    : Psychological stress and the risk of breast cancer: a case-control study. Cancer Detect Prev 28(6): 399-408, 2004. DOI: 10.1016/j.cdp.2004.07.009
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Ollonen P,
    2. Lehtonen J,
    3. Eskelinen M
    : Stressful and adverse life experiences in patients with breast symptoms; a prospective case-control study in Kuopio, Finland. Anticancer Res 25(1B): 531-536, 2005.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    1. Kruk J
    : Self-reported psychological stress and the risk of breast cancer: A case-control study. Stress 15(2): 162-171, 2012. DOI: 10.3109/10253890.2011.606340
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Ollonen P,
    2. Lehtonen J,
    3. Eskelinen M
    : Anxiety, depression and the history of psychiatric symptoms in patients with breast disease: a prospective case-control study in Kuopio, Finland. Anticancer Res 25(3C): 2527-2533, 2005.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Ollonen P,
    2. Lehtonen J,
    3. Eskelinen M
    : Coping and defending as risk factors for breast cancer in patients with breast disease: a prospective case-control study in Kuopio, Finland. Anticancer Res 25(6C): 4623-4630, 2005.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    1. Ollonen P,
    2. Eskelinen M
    : Idealization as risk factor for breast cancer in patients with breast disease: a prospective case-control study in Kuopio, Finland. Anticancer Res 27(3B): 1625-1630, 2007.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    1. Eskelinen M,
    2. Ollonen P
    : Forsen psychological risk inventory for breast cancer patients: a prospective case-control study with special reference to the use of psychiatric medications. Anticancer Res 31(2): 739-744, 2011.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    1. Eskelinen M,
    2. Ollonen P
    : Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) in patients with breast disease and breast cancer: a prospective case-control study. In Vivo 25(1): 111-116, 2011.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Eskelinen M,
    2. Korhonen R,
    3. Selander T,
    4. Ollonen P
    : The relation of hopelessness/helplessness versus Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) in healthy individuals and in patients with benign breast disease and breast cancer: a prospective case-control study in Finland. Anticancer Res 35(2): 941-947, 2015.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    1. Eskelinen M,
    2. Korhonen R,
    3. Selander T,
    4. Ollonen P
    : Beck depression inventory as a predictor of long-term outcome among patients admitted to the breast cancer diagnosis unit: a 25-year cohort study in Finland. Anticancer Res 37(2): 819-824, 2017. DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.11383
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    1. Eskelinen M,
    2. Ollonen P
    : Montgomery-Asberg depression rating scale (MADRS) in healthy study subjects, in patients with breast disease and breast cancer: a prospective case-control study. Anticancer Res 31(3): 1065-1069, 2011.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Eskelinen M,
    2. Korhonen R,
    3. Selander T,
    4. Ollonen P
    : Agreement between Hopelessness/Helplessness versus Montgomery-Asberg depression rating scale (MADRS) in healthy individuals and in patients with benign breast disease and breast cancer: a prospective case-control study in Finland. Anticancer Res 35(4): 2215-2221, 2015.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    1. Eskelinen M,
    2. Selander T,
    3. Ollonen P,
    4. Korhonen R
    : Moderate/severe Depression (MADRS) can affect the quality of life and outcome among patients admitted to breast cancer diagnosis unit. Anticancer Res 37(5): 2641-2647, 2017. DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.11611
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    1. Eskelinen M,
    2. Ollonen P
    : Assessment of general anxiety in patients with breast disease and breast cancer using the Spielberger STAI self-evaluation test: a prospective case-control study in Finland. Anticancer Res 31(5): 1801-1806, 2011.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    1. Eskelinen M,
    2. Koskela R,
    3. Selander T,
    4. Kaarniranta K,
    5. Ollonen P,
    6. Eskelinen M
    : The impact of State-trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) self-evaluation versus 25-year outcome: a prospective follow-up study in patients with breast cancer symptoms. Anticancer Res 45(5): 2161-2169, 2025. DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.17590
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    1. Reiche EM,
    2. Nunes SO,
    3. Morimoto HK
    : Stress, depression, the immune system, and cancer. Lancet Oncol 5(10): 617-625, 2004. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(04)01597-9
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Powell N,
    2. Tarr A,
    3. Sheridan J
    : Psychosocial stress and inflammation in cancer. Brain, Behavior, and Immunity 30: S41-S47, 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbi.2012.06.015
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Gounaris A,
    2. Zagouri F,
    3. Sergentanis TN,
    4. Provatopoulou X,
    5. Kalogera E,
    6. Sagkriotis A,
    7. Bramis J,
    8. Zografos GC
    : Vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: insight into stress-induced endocrine events. In Vivo 21(6): 1081-1084, 2007.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    1. Zografos GC,
    2. Zagouri F,
    3. Sergentanis TN,
    4. Giannakopoulou G,
    5. Provatopoulou X,
    6. Kalogera E,
    7. Papadimitriou C,
    8. Filippakis G,
    9. Sagkriotis A,
    10. Bramis J,
    11. Gounaris A
    : Excisional breast biopsy under local anesthesia: stress-related neuroendocrine, metabolic and immune reactions during the procedure. In Vivo 23(4): 649-652, 2009.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    1. Purdy M,
    2. Kärkkäinen J,
    3. Kokki M,
    4. Anttila M,
    5. Aspinen S,
    6. Juvonen P,
    7. Kokki H,
    8. Pulkki K,
    9. Rantanen T,
    10. Eskelinen M
    : Does rectus sheath block analgesia alter levels of the oxidative stress biomarker glutathione peroxidase: a randomised trial of patients with cancer and benign disease. Anticancer Res 37(2): 897-902, 2017. DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.11396
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    1. Kärkkäinen J,
    2. Selander T,
    3. Purdy M,
    4. Juvonen P,
    5. Eskelinen M
    : Patients with increased levels of the oxidative stress biomarker SOD1 appear to have diminished postoperative pain after midline laparotomy: a randomised trial with special reference to Postoperative Pain Score (NRS). Anticancer Res 38(2): 1003-1008, 2018. DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.12315
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    1. Kärkkäinen J,
    2. Saimanen I,
    3. Selander T,
    4. Aspinen S,
    5. Harju J,
    6. Juvonen P,
    7. Eskelinen M
    : Gallstone patients with enhanced oxidative stress biomarker superoxide dismutase (SOD1) plasma levels have significantly lower number of postoperative analgesic oxycodone doses: a prospective study with special reference to cancer patients. Anticancer Res 38(6): 3573-3578, 2018. DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.12630
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. ↵
    1. Saimanen I,
    2. Rahkola D,
    3. Kuosmanen V,
    4. Kärkkäinen J,
    5. Selander T,
    6. Holopainen A,
    7. Aspinen S,
    8. Eskelinen M
    : Nitrotyrosine (NT), a nitrosative stress biomarker, plasma concentrations in gallstone disease and cancer patients. Anticancer Res 39(2): 809-814, 2019. DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.13179
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. ↵
    1. Biro E,
    2. Kahan Z,
    3. Kalman J,
    4. Rusz O,
    5. Pakaski M,
    6. Irinyi T,
    7. Kelemen G,
    8. Dudás R,
    9. Drotos G,
    10. Hamvai C
    : Cognitive functioning and psychological well-being in breast cancer patients on endocrine therapy. In Vivo 33(4): 1381-1392, 2019. DOI: 10.21873/invivo.11615
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. ↵
    1. Rades D,
    2. Narvaez CA,
    3. Dziggel L,
    4. Tvilsted S,
    5. Kjaer TW,
    6. Schild SE,
    7. Bartscht T
    : Emotional problems prior to adjuvant radiation therapy for breast cancer. In Vivo 35(5): 2763-2770, 2021. DOI: 10.21873/invivo.12561
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. ↵
    1. Neagu AN,
    2. Whitham D,
    3. Buonanno E,
    4. Jenkins A,
    5. Alexa-Stratulat T,
    6. Tamba BI,
    7. Darie CC
    : Proteomics and its applications in breast cancer. Am J Cancer Res 11(9): 4006-4049, 2021.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Neagu AN,
    2. Jayathirtha M,
    3. Whitham D,
    4. Mutsengi P,
    5. Sullivan I,
    6. Petre BA,
    7. Darie CC
    : Proteomics-based identification of dysregulated proteins in breast cancer. Proteomes 10(4): 35, 2022. DOI: 10.3390/proteomes10040035
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    1. Neagu AN,
    2. Whitham D,
    3. Bruno P,
    4. Morrissiey H,
    5. Darie CA,
    6. Darie CC
    : Omics-based investigations of breast cancer. Molecules 28(12): 4768, 2023. DOI: 10.3390/molecules28124768
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research: 45 (9)
Anticancer Research
Vol. 45, Issue 9
September 2025
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Psychological Stress Versus Outcome in Patients With Breast Disease and Breast Cancer: A Prospective 25-year Follow-up Study in Patients With Breast Cancer Symptoms
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
3 + 16 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Psychological Stress Versus Outcome in Patients With Breast Disease and Breast Cancer: A Prospective 25-year Follow-up Study in Patients With Breast Cancer Symptoms
MATTI ESKELINEN, RIIKA KOSKELA, TUOMAS SELANDER, KAI KAARNIRANTA, PAULA OLLONEN, MAARET ESKELINEN
Anticancer Research Sep 2025, 45 (9) 3817-3826; DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.17741

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Psychological Stress Versus Outcome in Patients With Breast Disease and Breast Cancer: A Prospective 25-year Follow-up Study in Patients With Breast Cancer Symptoms
MATTI ESKELINEN, RIIKA KOSKELA, TUOMAS SELANDER, KAI KAARNIRANTA, PAULA OLLONEN, MAARET ESKELINEN
Anticancer Research Sep 2025, 45 (9) 3817-3826; DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.17741
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Patients and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • The Posterior First Approach in Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer Reduces Positive Surgical Margins on the Bladder Neck Side
  • Gamma Knife Radiotherapy of Brain Metastasis Resection Cavities: Outcome Analysis of a Single-center Cohort
  • Efficacy and Safety of Chemoimmunotherapy in Patients With Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer With Pre-existing Interstitial Pneumonia and Low PD-L1 Expression
Show more Clinical Studies

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Psychological stress
  • Forsen scale
  • breast cancer symptoms
  • long-term outcome
Anticancer Research

© 2025 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire