Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleClinical Studies
Open Access

Tertiary Lymphoid Structures in Brain Metastases of Lung Cancer: Prognostic Significance and Correlation With Clinical Outcomes

SHOTA NOHIRA, SHUNICHIRO KURAMITSU, MASASUKE OHNO, MITSUGU FUJITA, KIMIHIRO YAMASHITA, TORU NAGASAKA, SHOICHI HAIMOTO, NORIAKI SAKAKURA, HIROKAZU MATSUSHITA and RYUTA SAITO
Anticancer Research August 2024, 44 (8) 3615-3621; DOI: https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.17184
SHOTA NOHIRA
1Department of Neurosurgery, Nagoya University Faculty of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan;
2Division of Translational Oncoimmunology, Aichi Cancer Center Research Institute, Nagoya, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
SHUNICHIRO KURAMITSU
2Division of Translational Oncoimmunology, Aichi Cancer Center Research Institute, Nagoya, Japan;
3Department of Neurosurgery, Nagoya Medical Center, Nagoya, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MASASUKE OHNO
4Department of Neurosurgery, Aichi Cancer Center, Nagoya, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: tennjikunezumi{at}gmail.com
MITSUGU FUJITA
5Center for Medical Education and Clinical Training, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka-Sayama, Japan;
6Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe University, Kobe, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: mfujita47{at}gmail.com
KIMIHIRO YAMASHITA
6Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe University, Kobe, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
TORU NAGASAKA
6Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe University, Kobe, Japan;
7Association of Medical Artificial Intelligence Curation (AMAIC), Nagoya, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
SHOICHI HAIMOTO
4Department of Neurosurgery, Aichi Cancer Center, Nagoya, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
NORIAKI SAKAKURA
8Department of Thoracic Surgery, Aichi Cancer Center, Nagoya, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
HIROKAZU MATSUSHITA
2Division of Translational Oncoimmunology, Aichi Cancer Center Research Institute, Nagoya, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
RYUTA SAITO
1Department of Neurosurgery, Nagoya University Faculty of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background/Aim: The prognosis of patients with brain metastases (BMs) originating from lung cancer remains poor, despite advancements in treatment strategies. The role of tertiary lymphoid structures (TLSs) within the tumor immune microenvironment of BMs has not been extensively explored. Patients and Methods: This study utilized patient-derived clinical samples from 17 patients with histologically confirmed BMs of lung cancer, undergoing surgical resection. Immunohistochemistry was employed to analyze the presence and characteristics of TLS and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) within BM tissues, correlating these with clinical outcomes. Results: TLSs, albeit in their immature form, were identified within BM tissues, distinguishing them from their mature counterparts in primary lung cancer tissues. A significant correlation between TLS density (but not TIL density) and improved postoperative survival was observed, underscoring the potential of TLS density as an independent prognostic marker. Furthermore, TLS density did not correlate with the Graded Prognostic Assessment (GPA) index, suggesting its unique prognostic value beyond conventional predictors. Conclusion: Our findings reveal the presence of TLSs in lung cancer-derived BMs and highlight their prognostic significance, independent of the GPA index. The identification of TLS within the unique central nervous system tumor microenvironment offers new insights into the immune landscape of BMs and suggests potential avenues for immunotherapeutic interventions targeting these structures to improve patient outcomes.

Key Words:
  • Tertiary lymphoid structures
  • brain metastases
  • lung cancer
  • tumor immune microenvironment (TIME)
  • prognostic biomarkers

Brain metastases (BMs) are the most common malignant tumors affecting the central nervous system (CNS). Treatment of BMs remains ineffective due to the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and the unique microenvironment of the brain, which is characterized by immune tolerance (1, 2). Lung cancer is a common primary tumor associated with BMs, accounting for 20-56% of cases (1). As advances in systemic therapies have led to better control of primary tumors or metastases outside the CNS, the development of targeted therapies for BMs has become a critical priority.

In recent years, the relationship between cancers and the immune system has been attracting attention. The most prominent of these are tertiary lymphoid structures (TLSs). These are ectopic lymph node-like aggregates of lymphocytes that form in non-lymphoid tissues observed in malignancies including lung cancer (3-5). TLSs have been shown to play critical roles in shaping the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) and contribute to anti-tumor immunity (6). In fact, the presence of TLSs in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) correlates with a favorable outcome in previous studies (7, 8).

Although CNS has traditionally been considered an immunologically privileged site, recent evidence has revealed that it possesses intrinsic immune surveillance mechanisms (9). In particular, TLSs in glioblastoma (GBM) have been shown to play an important role in the presentation of tumor antigens and the promotion of ani-tumor T cell priming (10, 11). These findings have led to a growing interest in understanding the mechanisms of the TIME of brain tumors. However, the presence and role of TLSs in BMs are largely unknown.

To address these research questions, we decided to analyze BM-associated TLSs using patient-derived clinical samples. Since lung cancer is the most common primary disease of BMs as mentioned above, we used this disease entity as our study population and investigated the correlation between TLS-associated parameters in tumor tissues and clinical parameters, including patient outcome.

Patients and Methods

Patients. This study was approved by the institutional ethics review board of Aichi Cancer Center (ACC) (approval number: IR041168). The requirement to obtain written informed consent from patients was waived owing to the retrospective nature of this study. Instead, a public notice providing information about this study was posted on our center’s website. All patient identifiers have been protected according to ethical guidelines. Seventeen consecutive patients with histologically confirmed BMs of lung cancer who underwent surgical resection at ACC from April 2018 to December 2022 were enrolled. A patient with postoperative complication (n=1) was excluded from this study.

Immunohistochemistry. The immunohistochemical staining procedure for formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded samples of metastatic lung cancer brain tumors has been described previously (12). Briefly, 4-μm tissue sections were used for hematoxylin and eosin (HE) staining and immunohistochemistry (IHC). Tissue sections were deparaffinized in xylene, rehydrated through a graded series of ethanol dilutions, and subjected to antigen retrieval using heat-induced epitope retrieval methods. One section from each series was stained with HE, while the remaining sections were immunostained with the following primary monoclonal antibodies (mAbs): rabbit anti-CD4 mAb (clone EPR6855, Abcam, Cambridge, UK), mouse anti-CD20 mAb (clone L26, Nichirei, Tokyo, Japan), mouse anti-BCL6 mAb (clone LN22, Nichirei), and mouse anti-CD8 mAb (clone C8/144B, DAKO, Glostrup, Denmark). The following secondary antibody complexes were then used: Histofine Simple Stain MAX-PO (mouse, Nichirei) for CD8 staining, and Histofine Simple Stain MAX-PO (rabbit, Nichirei) and Histofine Simple Stain AP (mouse, Nichirei) for the triple staining of CD4, CD20, and BCL6. Chromogenic reaction was performed using the First Red II Substrate Kit (Nichirei), HistoGreen Substrate Kit (Cosmo Bio, Tokyo, Japan), and Histofine DAB Substrate Kit (Nichirei). Nuclei were contrast stained with hematoxylin.

Image analysis. Image analysis was performed using QuPath (ver 0.5.0), an open-source software platform for digital pathology and bioimage analysis (13). It provides a comprehensive set of tools for the analysis and interpretation of whole slide images (WSIs) and other large biomedical images. The stained tissue sections were digitally scanned using a NanoZoomer-SQ whole slide imaging system (Hamamatsu Photonics, Hamamatsu, Japan) with a 20X 0.75 NA objective lens, according to a standardized protocol. The scanned images were then imported into QuPath for quantitative analysis. The “create threshold” algorithm was used to acquire individual tumor tissue regions. Immunostained cells were identified as follows: First Red II for CD4 and CD8, DAB for CD20, and HistoGreen for Bcl-6. After the manual configuration of color thresholds (color deconvolution), each immunostained cell was detected and quantified using QuPath’s positive cell detection algorithm. Immune cell density was measured as the number of cells per 1 mm2 of tumor area. Lymphocytes accumulated around radiation necrosis were excluded from the analysis.

Statistical analysis. All statistical analyses were performed using EZR software (version 1.64, Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, Saitama, Japan) as previously described (14, 15). Statistical significance between two groups was determined using Mann–Whitney U-test. Log-rank test with Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival time analysis. Statistical significance was defined as p<0.05.

Results

Clinical characteristics of patients with BMs derived from lung cancer. We first investigated the patient characteristics (Table I and Table II). Patients underwent surgical BM resection at a mean age of 64. Mean postoperative overall survival (OS) was 14 months. In more details, the 17 cohorts consisted of nine males (53%) and eight females (47%). Histopathological diagnoses of the surgical specimens of BMs were 15 adenocarcinomas, one squamous cell carcinoma, and one small cell lung cancer. Regarding the postoperative OS, those who survived less than one year were 10 patients (59%) and the others (41%) survived over one year. Those who received preoperative radiation were 14 patients (82%), and 10 patients (59%) received postoperative radiation. Those who received preoperative chemotherapy were 13 patients (76%), and 10 patients (59%) received postoperative chemotherapy. We observed no significant differences regarding these characteristics. There were five cases of primary tumor specimen available for simultaneous analysis.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

Summary of patient characteristics.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table II.

Details of patient characteristics.

Lung cancer-derived BM tissues consist of immature TLSs. To investigate the distribution of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in BMs of lung cancer, we first examined whether we could identify the cells positive for CD20, Bcl-6, CD4, and CD8 in the BM tissues. In the primary lesions of lung cancers, we observed mature TLSs that were characterized by well-organized structures and the presence of germinal centers (GCs) containing CD20+ Bcl-6+ B cells (Figure 1A). In contrast, although we sporadically identified aggregates of CD20+ B lymphocytes at the peritumoral lesions in the BM tissues, they lacked organized structures and the formation of GCs (Figure 1B). These cell aggregates were considered immature TLSs, and we decided to analyze them in this study.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Lung cancer-derived brain metastases (BMs) consist of immature tertiary lymphoid structures (TLSs). (A and B) Representative pathological images of TLSs in primary lung cancer and BMs. The sections were stained with CD4 (red), CD20 (brown), and Bcl-6 (green). (A) A TLS in a primary lung cancer. Magnification: 10×, scale bar: 100 μm. (B) A TLS in a BM tissue. Magnification: 20×, scale bar: 50 μm. (C and D) Comparison of the densities of TLSs (C) and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs; D) in the primary lung cancers (n=5) and the BMs (n=17). p-Values were determined using the Mann–Whitney U-test. *p<0.05; ***p<0.001.

Next, we examined quantitative differences between TLSs in the primary tumors and BMs using five cases for which both primary tumors and BM specimens were available. The mean TLS density in the primary lung cancer tissues was 3.426/mm2 (n=5), and that of BM tissues was 0.8323/mm2 (n=17) (p=0.0022; Figure 1C). Regarding TILs, the mean TIL density in the lung cancer tissues was 6,201/mm2 (n=5), while that of in BM tissues was 572/mm2 (n=17) (p=0.000304; Figure 1D).

TLS density, but not TIL density, in BMs correlates with patients’ survival after surgical resection. We then assessed the prognostic significance of TLS and TILs in the BM tissues. To this end, all the patients were divided into two groups based on the median densities of TILs and TLSs (high: n=8, low: n=9) in the BM tissues, respectively. The TLS density was significantly associated with a favorable clinical outcome after surgical resection (Figure 2A). In contrast, although the TIL density has been previously reported as a favorable prognostic factor in NSCLC (16), we observed no significant association between the postoperative survival and the TIL density in BMs (Figure 2B).

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Tertiary lymphoid structure (TLS) density, but not tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) density, in brain metastases (BMs) correlates with patients’ survival after surgical resection. Kaplan–Meier plots displaying postoperative overall survival (OS) of the patients with BMs stratified into high- (n=8) and low-density groups (n=9) based on TLS (A) and TIL (B). p-Values were determined by log-rank test. *p<0.05; N.S.: Not significant.

TLS density in BMs is a prognostic factor of lung cancer-derived BM patients independent of GPA index. The Graded Prognostic Assessment (GPA) is a widely used prognostic index to estimate survival in patients with BMs (17, 18). As we observed a positive correlation between the TLS density and patient outcome (Figure 2A), we investigated the correlation between the TLS density and the GPA index. To address this issue, all the patients were divided into two groups based on the median value of GPA index (high: n=8, low: n=9). The group with a higher GPA index showed significantly longer postoperative OS (p=0.00436; Figure 3A), as well as postoperative PFS (p=0.003) and OS (p=0.0028) from metastasis diagnosis (data not shown). These data suggested that the GPA index serves as a good prognostic indicator. However, we observed no statistically significant association between the TLS density and the GPA index (p=0.36; Figure 3B). The TIL density showed no significant association with the GPA index, either (p=0.6304; Figure 3C). Although neither the TLS density nor the TIL density showed any association with GPA index (Figure 3B and C), the TLS density alone (Figure 2A) may serve as a prognostic factor of lung cancer-derived patients with BMs, independent of GPA index.

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

Tertiary lymphoid structure (TLS) density in brain metastases (BMs) is a prognostic factor in patients with lung cancer-derived BM independent of Graded prognostic assessment (GPA) index. The cohorts were classified into two groups based on the GPA index for the correlations between the GPA index, an established prognostic index of BMs, and postoperative overall survival (OS) (A). the TLS density of BMs (B), and the TIL density of BMs (C). p-Values were determined using the Mann–Whitney U-test. *p<0.05; N.S.: Not significant.

Discussion

In this study, we identified TLSs in the BMs of lung cancer using surgically resected specimens and compared the morphological and quantitative characteristic of TLSs in BMs with those in primary lung cancers (Figure 1). Furthermore, we demonstrated that the TLS density-based grading (high vs. low) significantly correlated with postoperative survival of the patients (Figure 2A). However, the TLS density itself did not correlate with GPA index, a well-established prognostic indicator for the patients with BMs (Figure 3B). These findings suggest that TLS density-associated parameters may serve as independent prognostic factors for the patients with BMs of lung cancer, providing additional information beyond the GPA index.

TLSs are ectopic lymphoid organs emerging in non-lymphoid tissues during chronic inflammation, such as chronic diseases and cancers (6, 19, 20). The development of TLSs is considered a multistep process that occurs in parallel with tumor growth and involves the recruitment and organization of immune cells in the TIME. During the immature stage of TLS formation, the structure is loose and lacks a well-defined organization. As the inflammatory stimulus persists, immature TLSs can develop into mature TLSs, characterized by a more organized structure, including GCs or distinct B cell and T cell zones (19). TLSs in BMs have rarely received attention since the CNS has been regarded as an immune-privileged site. However, recent studies have highlighted the importance of the immune system in brain tumors, and TLSs have been unveiled to support antitumor responses by priming T and B cells at the tumor site, fostering antigen presentation and generating a local lymphoid niche in malignancies (5). To investigate the existence of TLSs in BMs, we first examined the distribution of TILs in both BMs and primary tumors and confirmed the presence of aggregates of lymphocytes mainly in the peritumoral regions (Figure 1A and B). Interestingly, while the TLSs in primary tumors exhibited an organized structure with GCs (Figure 1A), the structure of TLSs in the BMs was loose and lacked GC formation (Figure 1B), These findings suggest that TLSs in the BMs observed in the current study appeared to share the characteristics of immature TLSs. To clarify the precise characteristics of BM-associated TLSs, we are now in the process of conducting flow cytometry and single cell mRNA analysis using additional clinical samples.

The correlation between TIL density and patient survival has been extensively studied along with TLSs (4, 16). Higher TIL density was generally associated with favorable outcomes in solid tumors including GBM (21). Recently, several studies have shown that the density of tumor-associated TLSs correlates with improved patient outcome, which led to a growing interest in the roles of TLSs in TIME (20). Based on these findings, we hypothesized that the density of TILs and TLSs in BMs of lung cancer would correlate with the patients’ outcome. We first tried to exclude the impact of preoperative chemotherapies and radiation therapies as potential confounding factors; we found no significant differences in patient outcome based on these factors (data not shown). When we directed our focus to the density of TILs and TLSs, we found that the density of both TILs and TLSs in primary tumors were significantly higher than in BMs as we expected (Figure 1C and D). Nevertheless, the TLS density in BMs still significantly correlated with postoperative overall survival of the patients (Figure 2A), while the TIL density showed no correlation (Figure 2B) in contrast to the results of a previous study (22). These data suggested that the TLSs may play a more important role in the anti-tumor immune response than diffusely distributed TILs, even though they were still in immature stage of development. These findings indicate that the TLS density would be useful as prognostic factor in BMs of lung cancer.

The GPA index is a potent prognostic factor that has been widely used to estimate the survival of the patients with BMs (17, 18). Formerly, it consisted of four parameters: age (≤50, 41-60, >60), Karnofsky Performance Status (<70, 70-80, 90-100), number of brain metastases (1, 2-3, >3), and presence or absence of extracranial metastases (17). Recently, it has been refined to incorporate additional factors, such as EGFR mutation and ALK rearrangement, as well as PD-L1 expression, because these factors significantly influence the choice of treatment in patients with lung cancer (lung-molGPA) (18). In our study, GPA index significantly correlated with postoperative OS (Figure 3A), as well as OS from the diagnosis of BMs and postoperative progression-free survival (PFS; data not shown). However, the GPA index did not correlate with the TLS density (Figure 3B) or even the TILs density (Figure 3C). These findings suggest that, while the GPA index remains a valuable tool for prognostication in patients with BM, the TLS density would also serve as an additional, complementary prognostic marker for them. Further research is needed to elucidate the mechanisms underlying TLS formation in BMs as to how the TLS densities can be integrated into existing prognostic models for better survival of patients with BM.

Study limitations. First, the sample size of 17 patients is relatively small. Larger studies are needed to draw more definitive conclusions. Second, this study was a retrospective study and conducted at a single institution, which may limit the generalizability of the findings. Prospective, multicenter studies with large patient cohorts will provide more robust evidence and help to validate the relationship between the TLS density and clinical outcomes in patients with BMs of lung cancer.

Conclusion

In conclusion, this is the first report to identify TLSs in the BMs of lung cancer and illustrate their morphological characteristics while comparing them with TLSs in the primary tumors. We also provide new insights into the potential roles of TLS density in BMs as a novel prognostic biomarker. Our findings shed light on the previously unknown role of TLSs in the TIME of the CNS and promote further research into the immune landscape of BMs. This research may lead to the development of novel immunotherapeutic strategies targeting TLSs to improve patient outcomes.

Acknowledgements

The Authors would like to thank the members of the ACC Research Institute for providing places and advice for this study and Ms. Heather A. McDonald in University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute for English proofreading. This work was enhanced by ChatGPT, Claude 3, DeepL, and Trinka for the manuscript preparation.

Footnotes

  • Authors’ Contributions

    SN, SK, MO, MF, KY, and TN conceptualized the project. SK, MO, and MF acquired the funding. MO, MF, and RS supervised the project and conducted the project administration. MO and HM provided resources. SN, MO, MF, and TN developed the methodology. SN, MO, SH, NS, and RS acquired the raw data. SN, SK, and MF carried out formal analyses. SN and SK wrote the original draft. SN, SK, MO, and MF edited the manuscript. All the Authors have reviewed and approved the manuscript to submit.

  • Conflicts of Interest

    The Authors declare no conflicts of interest in relation to this study.

  • Funding

    This work was supported by the Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan (MEXT; 23K15677 to SK, 22K09223 to MO, and 21K09167 to MF) as well as Aichi Cancer Research Foundation to MO.

  • Received May 21, 2024.
  • Revision received June 14, 2024.
  • Accepted June 17, 2024.
  • Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by the International Institute of Anticancer Research.

This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 international license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0).

References

  1. ↵
    1. Achrol AS,
    2. Rennert RC,
    3. Anders C,
    4. Soffietti R,
    5. Ahluwalia MS,
    6. Nayak L,
    7. Peters S,
    8. Arvold ND,
    9. Harsh GR,
    10. Steeg PS,
    11. Chang SD
    : Brain metastases. Nat Rev Dis Primers 5(1): 5, 2019. DOI: 10.1038/s41572-018-0055-y
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Lamba N,
    2. Wen PY,
    3. Aizer AA
    : Epidemiology of brain metastases and leptomeningeal disease. Neuro Oncol 23(9): 1447-1456, 2021. DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noab101
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Sautès-Fridman C,
    2. Petitprez F,
    3. Calderaro J,
    4. Fridman WH
    : Tertiary lymphoid structures in the era of cancer immunotherapy. Nat Rev Cancer 19(6): 307-325, 2019. DOI: 10.1038/s41568-019-0144-6
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Engelhard VH,
    2. Rodriguez AB,
    3. Mauldin IS,
    4. Woods AN,
    5. Peske JD,
    6. Slingluff CL Jr.
    : Immune cell infiltration and tertiary lymphoid structures as determinants of antitumor immunity. J Immunol 200(2): 432-442, 2018. DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1701269
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. Schumacher TN,
    2. Thommen DS
    : Tertiary lymphoid structures in cancer. Science 375(6576): eabf9419, 2022. DOI: 10.1126/science.abf9419
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Lauss M,
    2. Donia M,
    3. Svane IM,
    4. Jönsson G
    : B Cells and tertiary lymphoid structures: friends or foes in cancer immunotherapy? Clin Cancer Res 28(9): 1751-1758, 2022. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-1130
    OpenUrlAbstract
  7. ↵
    1. Fukuhara M,
    2. Muto S,
    3. Inomata S,
    4. Yamaguchi H,
    5. Mine H,
    6. Takagi H,
    7. Ozaki Y,
    8. Watanabe M,
    9. Inoue T,
    10. Yamaura T,
    11. Okabe N,
    12. Matsumura Y,
    13. Hasegawa T,
    14. Osugi J,
    15. Hoshino M,
    16. Higuchi M,
    17. Shio Y,
    18. Suzuki H
    : The clinical significance of tertiary lymphoid structure and its relationship with peripheral blood characteristics in patients with surgically resected non-small cell lung cancer: a single-center, retrospective study. Cancer Immunol Immunother 71(5): 1129-1137, 2022. DOI: 10.1007/s00262-021-03067-3
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Zhao H,
    2. Wang H,
    3. Zhao Y,
    4. Sun Q,
    5. Ren X
    : Tumor-resident T cells, associated with tertiary lymphoid structure maturity, improve survival in patients with stage III lung adenocarcinoma. Front Immunol 13: 877689, 2022. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.877689
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Norris GT,
    2. Kipnis J
    : Immune cells and CNS physiology: Microglia and beyond. J Exp Med 216(1): 60-70, 2019. DOI: 10.1084/jem.20180199
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. van de Walle T,
    2. Vaccaro A,
    3. Ramachandran M,
    4. Pietilä I,
    5. Essand M,
    6. Dimberg A
    : Tertiary lymphoid structures in the central nervous system: implications for glioblastoma. Front Immunol 12: 724739, 2021. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.724739
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. van Hooren L,
    2. Vaccaro A,
    3. Ramachandran M,
    4. Vazaios K,
    5. Libard S,
    6. van de Walle T,
    7. Georganaki M,
    8. Huang H,
    9. Pietilä I,
    10. Lau J,
    11. Ulvmar MH,
    12. Karlsson MCI,
    13. Zetterling M,
    14. Mangsbo SM,
    15. Jakola AS,
    16. Olsson Bontell T,
    17. Smits A,
    18. Essand M,
    19. Dimberg A
    : Agonistic CD40 therapy induces tertiary lymphoid structures but impairs responses to checkpoint blockade in glioma. Nat Commun 12(1): 4127, 2021. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-24347-7
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Fukuoka E,
    2. Yamashita K,
    3. Tanaka T,
    4. Sawada R,
    5. Sugita Y,
    6. Arimoto A,
    7. Fujita M,
    8. Takiguchi G,
    9. Matsuda T,
    10. Oshikiri T,
    11. Nakamura T,
    12. Suzuki S,
    13. Kakeji Y
    : Neoadjuvant chemotherapy increases PD-L1 expression and CD8+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Anticancer Res 39(8): 4539-4548, 2019. DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.13631
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    1. Bankhead P,
    2. Loughrey MB,
    3. Fernández JA,
    4. Dombrowski Y,
    5. McArt DG,
    6. Dunne PD,
    7. McQuaid S,
    8. Gray RT,
    9. Murray LJ,
    10. Coleman HG,
    11. James JA,
    12. Salto-Tellez M,
    13. Hamilton PW
    : QuPath: Open source software for digital pathology image analysis. Sci Rep 7(1): 16878, 2017. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-17204-5
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Yoshioka H,
    2. Okuda T,
    3. Nakao T,
    4. Fujita M,
    5. Takahashi JC
    : Experience with tirabrutinib in the treatment of primary central nervous system lymphoma that is difficult to treat with standard treatment. Anticancer Res 42(8): 4173-4178, 2022. DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.15917
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    1. Ohno M,
    2. Haimoto S,
    3. Tsukushi S,
    4. Hosoda W,
    5. Ohka F,
    6. Saito R
    : Brain metastasis and intracranial leptomeningeal metastasis from malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors: illustrative cases. J Neurosurg Case Lessons 6(3): CASE23148, 2023. DOI: 10.3171/CASE23148
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  16. ↵
    1. Zeng DQ,
    2. Yu YF,
    3. Ou QY,
    4. Li XY,
    5. Zhong RZ,
    6. Xie CM,
    7. Hu QG
    : Prognostic and predictive value of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes for clinical therapeutic research in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Oncotarget 7(12): 13765-13781, 2016. DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.7282
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Sperduto PW,
    2. Kased N,
    3. Roberge D,
    4. Xu Z,
    5. Shanley R,
    6. Luo X,
    7. Sneed PK,
    8. Chao ST,
    9. Weil RJ,
    10. Suh J,
    11. Bhatt A,
    12. Jensen AW,
    13. Brown PD,
    14. Shih HA,
    15. Kirkpatrick J,
    16. Gaspar LE,
    17. Fiveash JB,
    18. Chiang V,
    19. Knisely JP,
    20. Sperduto CM,
    21. Lin N,
    22. Mehta M
    : Summary report on the graded prognostic assessment: an accurate and facile diagnosis-specific tool to estimate survival for patients with brain metastases. J Clin Oncol 30(4): 419-425, 2012. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2011.38.0527
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    1. Sperduto PW,
    2. De B,
    3. Li J,
    4. Carpenter D,
    5. Kirkpatrick J,
    6. Milligan M,
    7. Shih HA,
    8. Kutuk T,
    9. Kotecha R,
    10. Higaki H,
    11. Otsuka M,
    12. Aoyama H,
    13. Bourgoin M,
    14. Roberge D,
    15. Dajani S,
    16. Sachdev S,
    17. Gainey J,
    18. Buatti JM,
    19. Breen W,
    20. Brown PD,
    21. Ni L,
    22. Braunstein S,
    23. Gallitto M,
    24. Wang TJC,
    25. Shanley R,
    26. Lou E,
    27. Shiao J,
    28. Gaspar LE,
    29. Tanabe S,
    30. Nakano T,
    31. An Y,
    32. Chiang V,
    33. Zeng L,
    34. Soliman H,
    35. Elhalawani H,
    36. Cagney D,
    37. Thomas E,
    38. Boggs DH,
    39. Ahluwalia MS,
    40. Mehta MP
    : Graded prognostic assessment (GPA) for patients with lung cancer and brain metastases: Initial report of the small cell lung cancer GPA and update of the non-small cell lung cancer GPA including the effect of programmed death ligand 1 and other prognostic factors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 114(1): 60-74, 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.03.020
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Sato Y,
    2. Silina K,
    3. van den Broek M,
    4. Hirahara K,
    5. Yanagita M
    : The roles of tertiary lymphoid structures in chronic diseases. Nat Rev Nephrol 19(8): 525-537, 2023. DOI: 10.1038/s41581-023-00706-z
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Engelhard VH,
    2. Rodriguez AB,
    3. Mauldin IS,
    4. Woods AN,
    5. Peske JD,
    6. Slingluff CL Jr.
    : Immune cell infiltration and tertiary lymphoid structures as determinants of antitumor immunity. J Immunol 200(2): 432-442, 2018. DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1701269
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    1. Rutledge WC,
    2. Kong J,
    3. Gao J,
    4. Gutman DA,
    5. Cooper LA,
    6. Appin C,
    7. Park Y,
    8. Scarpace L,
    9. Mikkelsen T,
    10. Cohen ML,
    11. Aldape KD,
    12. McLendon RE,
    13. Lehman NL,
    14. Miller CR,
    15. Schniederjan MJ,
    16. Brennan CW,
    17. Saltz JH,
    18. Moreno CS,
    19. Brat DJ
    : Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in glioblastoma are associated with specific genomic alterations and related to transcriptional class. Clin Cancer Res 19(18): 4951-4960, 2013. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-0551
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    1. Berghoff AS,
    2. Fuchs E,
    3. Ricken G,
    4. Mlecnik B,
    5. Bindea G,
    6. Spanberger T,
    7. Hackl M,
    8. Widhalm G,
    9. Dieckmann K,
    10. Prayer D,
    11. Bilocq A,
    12. Heinzl H,
    13. Zielinski C,
    14. Bartsch R,
    15. Birner P,
    16. Galon J,
    17. Preusser M
    : Density of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes correlates with extent of brain edema and overall survival time in patients with brain metastases. Oncoimmunology 5(1): e1057388, 2015. DOI: 10.1080/2162402X.2015.1057388
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research: 44 (8)
Anticancer Research
Vol. 44, Issue 8
August 2024
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Tertiary Lymphoid Structures in Brain Metastases of Lung Cancer: Prognostic Significance and Correlation With Clinical Outcomes
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
2 + 11 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Tertiary Lymphoid Structures in Brain Metastases of Lung Cancer: Prognostic Significance and Correlation With Clinical Outcomes
SHOTA NOHIRA, SHUNICHIRO KURAMITSU, MASASUKE OHNO, MITSUGU FUJITA, KIMIHIRO YAMASHITA, TORU NAGASAKA, SHOICHI HAIMOTO, NORIAKI SAKAKURA, HIROKAZU MATSUSHITA, RYUTA SAITO
Anticancer Research Aug 2024, 44 (8) 3615-3621; DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.17184

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Tertiary Lymphoid Structures in Brain Metastases of Lung Cancer: Prognostic Significance and Correlation With Clinical Outcomes
SHOTA NOHIRA, SHUNICHIRO KURAMITSU, MASASUKE OHNO, MITSUGU FUJITA, KIMIHIRO YAMASHITA, TORU NAGASAKA, SHOICHI HAIMOTO, NORIAKI SAKAKURA, HIROKAZU MATSUSHITA, RYUTA SAITO
Anticancer Research Aug 2024, 44 (8) 3615-3621; DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.17184
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Patients and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Acknowledgements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

  • Immature Peritumoral Tertiary Lymphoid Structures Indicate Poor Prognosis in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma After NAC
  • Hallmarks of adaptive immunity in a metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) long-term elite survivor
  • Prognostic Value of Tertiary Lymphoid Structures in Epithelial Ovarian Carcinoma
  • Potential Role of Tumor-derived MIF in B-Cell Antigen Presentation in Lung Adenocarcinoma: Single-cell and TCGA Analyses
  • Characterization of Tumor Immune Microenvironment in Meningiomas: Correlation of Tumor-infiltrating Lymphocyte Aggregates With Tumor Grade
  • Identification and characterization of tertiary lymphoid structures in brain metastases
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Clinical Outcomes of the Optimized Weekly 8-Gy Palliative Radiotherapy Regimen
  • Upfront Radiation Therapy Increases Severe Neurotoxicity Risk in Patients With Oligodendrogliomas
  • Survival Then and Now in Patients With Surgically Resected Brain Metastasis: Major Improvement in Cases With Controlled Primary Tumor
Show more Clinical Studies

Keywords

  • Tertiary lymphoid structures
  • brain metastases
  • lung cancer
  • tumor immune microenvironment (TIME)
  • prognostic biomarkers
Anticancer Research

© 2026 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire