Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleClinical Studies

A Machine Learning Model to Predict the Histology of Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection Specimens

SATOSHI NITTA, TAKAHIRO KOJIMA, MASANOBU GIDO, SHOTA NAKAGAWA, HIDEKI KAKEYA, SHUYA KANDORI, TAKASHI KAWAHARA, BRYAN J. MATHIS, KOJI KAWAI, HIROMITSU NEGORO and HIROYUKI NISHIYAMA
Anticancer Research May 2024, 44 (5) 2151-2157; DOI: https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.17021
SATOSHI NITTA
1Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
TAKAHIRO KOJIMA
2Department of Urology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: t.kojima{at}aichi-cc.jp
MASANOBU GIDO
3Department of Intelligent Functional Systems, Graduate School of Systems and Information Engineering, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
SHOTA NAKAGAWA
3Department of Intelligent Functional Systems, Graduate School of Systems and Information Engineering, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
HIDEKI KAKEYA
3Department of Intelligent Functional Systems, Graduate School of Systems and Information Engineering, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
SHUYA KANDORI
1Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
TAKASHI KAWAHARA
1Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
BRYAN J. MATHIS
4International Medical Center, University of Tsukuba Affiliated Hospital, Tsukuba, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
KOJI KAWAI
5Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, International University of Health and Welfare Narita Hospital, Narita, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
HIROMITSU NEGORO
1Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
HIROYUKI NISHIYAMA
1Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background/Aim: While post-chemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (PC-RPLND) benefits patients with teratoma or viable germ cell tumors (GCT), it becomes overtreatment if necrosis is detected in PC-RPLND specimens. Serum microRNA-371a-3p correctly predicts residual viable GCT with 100% sensitivity; however, prediction of residual teratoma in PC-RPLND specimens using current modalities remains difficult. Therefore, we developed a machine learning model using CT imaging and clinical variables to predict the presence of residual teratoma in PC-RPLND specimens. Patients and Methods: This study included 58 patients who underwent PC-RPLND between 2005 and 2019 at the University of Tsukuba Hospital. On CT imaging, 155 lymph nodes were identified as regions of interest (ROIs). The ResNet50 algorithm and/or Support Vector Machine (SVM) classification were applied and a nested, 3-fold cross-validation protocol was used to determine classifier accuracy. Results: PC-RPLND specimen analysis revealed 35 patients with necrosis and 23 patients with residual teratoma, while histology of 155 total ROIs showed necrosis in 84 ROIs and teratoma in 71 ROIs. The ResNet50 algorithm, using CT imaging, achieved a diagnostic accuracy of 80.0%, corresponding to a sensitivity of 67.3%, a specificity of 90.5%, and an AUC of 0.84, whereas SVM classification using clinical variables achieved a diagnostic accuracy of 74.8%, corresponding to a sensitivity of 59.0%, a specificity of 88.1%, and an AUC of 0.84. Conclusion: Our machine learning models reliably distinguish between necrosis and residual teratoma in clinical PC-RPLND specimens.

Key Words:
  • Germ cell tumor
  • machine learning model
  • post-chemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection
  • Resnet50 algorithm
  • support vector machine
  • Received February 21, 2024.
  • Revision received March 13, 2024.
  • Accepted March 14, 2024.
  • Copyright © 2024 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.
View Full Text

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?

Purchase access

You may purchase access to this article. This will require you to create an account if you don't already have one.

patientACCESS

patientACCESS - Patients desiring access to articles
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research: 44 (5)
Anticancer Research
Vol. 44, Issue 5
May 2024
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A Machine Learning Model to Predict the Histology of Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection Specimens
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
3 + 5 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
A Machine Learning Model to Predict the Histology of Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection Specimens
SATOSHI NITTA, TAKAHIRO KOJIMA, MASANOBU GIDO, SHOTA NAKAGAWA, HIDEKI KAKEYA, SHUYA KANDORI, TAKASHI KAWAHARA, BRYAN J. MATHIS, KOJI KAWAI, HIROMITSU NEGORO, HIROYUKI NISHIYAMA
Anticancer Research May 2024, 44 (5) 2151-2157; DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.17021

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
A Machine Learning Model to Predict the Histology of Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection Specimens
SATOSHI NITTA, TAKAHIRO KOJIMA, MASANOBU GIDO, SHOTA NAKAGAWA, HIDEKI KAKEYA, SHUYA KANDORI, TAKASHI KAWAHARA, BRYAN J. MATHIS, KOJI KAWAI, HIROMITSU NEGORO, HIROYUKI NISHIYAMA
Anticancer Research May 2024, 44 (5) 2151-2157; DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.17021
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Patients and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Acknowledgements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

  • Development and External Validation of Machine Learning-based Models for Predicting Survival Outcomes in Endometrial Cancer: A Population-based Study
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Expression of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A in Gallbladder Cancer Cells: A Clinicopathological Study
  • Prediction of Pathological Response and Prognosis After Surgery by Tumor Reduction During Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients With Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
  • Tolerance and Outcomes of Partial Breast Radiation in a Community-based Setting
Show more Clinical Studies

Keywords

  • germ cell tumor
  • machine learning model
  • post-chemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection
  • Resnet50 algorithm
  • support vector machine
Anticancer Research

© 2026 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire