Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleClinical Studies

Comparison of Oncological Outcomes of Pembrolizumab as Second-line Therapy and Maintenance Avelumab Therapy in Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma After Platinum-based Chemotherapy

TETSUYA SHINDO, KOHEI HASHIMOTO, ATSUSHI TAKAHASHI, SHINTARO MIYAMOTO, YASUHARU KUNISHIMA, SHUNSUKE SATO, FUMIMASA FUKUTA, YOSHIKI HIYAMA, AKIO TAKAYANAGI, RYUICHI KATO, ATSUSHI WANIFUCHI, YOHEI UEKI, MANABU OKADA, HIDEKI ADACHI, KO KOBAYASHI, TOSHIAKI TANAKA and NAOYA MASUMORI; on behalf of the Sapporo Medical University Urologic Oncology Consortium
Anticancer Research March 2024, 44 (3) 1271-1279; DOI: https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.16922
TETSUYA SHINDO
1Department of Urology, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: shindo1013{at}yahoo.co.jp
KOHEI HASHIMOTO
1Department of Urology, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
ATSUSHI TAKAHASHI
2Department of Urology, Hakodate Goryoukaku Hospital, Hakodate, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
SHINTARO MIYAMOTO
3Department of Urology, Japanese Red Cross Asahikawa Hospital, Asahikawa, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
YASUHARU KUNISHIMA
4Department of Urology, Sunagawa City Medical Center, Sunagawa, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
SHUNSUKE SATO
5Department of Urology, Oji General Hospital, Tomakomai, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
FUMIMASA FUKUTA
6Department of Urology, Steel Memorial Muroran Hospital, Muroran, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
YOSHIKI HIYAMA
7Department of Urology, NTT Medical Center Sapporo, Sapporo, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
AKIO TAKAYANAGI
8Department of Urology, Japan Community Healthcare Organization Hokkaido Hospital, Sapporo, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
RYUICHI KATO
9Department of Urology, Muroran City General Hospital, Muroran, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
ATSUSHI WANIFUCHI
10Department of Urology, Japanese Red Cross Kushiro Hospital, Kushiro, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
YOHEI UEKI
11Department of Urology, Takikawa Municipal Hospital, Takikawa, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MANABU OKADA
12Department of Urology, Obihiro Kyokai Hospital, Obihiro, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
HIDEKI ADACHI
13Department of Urology, Saiseikai Otaru Hospital, Otaru, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
KO KOBAYASHI
1Department of Urology, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
TOSHIAKI TANAKA
1Department of Urology, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
NAOYA MASUMORI
1Department of Urology, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background/Aim: Sequential therapy using chemotherapy and subsequent immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment prolongs the survival of patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC). However, no comparison data for oncological outcome between pembrolizumab and avelumab has been reported. Thus, we compared oncological outcomes between pembrolizumab as second-line therapy and maintenance avelumab therapy in patients with advanced UC. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively evaluated patients with advanced UC treated with pembrolizumab or avelumab between January 2018 and February 2023. We compared oncological outcomes after adjusting for patient characteristics. Immune-related adverse events (AEs) in each group were evaluated using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. Results: There were 186 and 44 patients in the pembrolizumab- and avelumab-treated cohorts, respectively. After propensity score matching, 43 patients from each group were selected and analyzed. Median progression-free survival from the initiation of pembrolizumab and avelumab treatments was 126 and 139 days, respectively (log-rank test, p=0.625). Median overall survival in the pembrolizumab and avelumab cohorts were 658 days and not reached, respectively (log-rank test, p=0.249). Thirty-eight (20.4%) and 14 (31.8%) all-grade immune-related AEs were observed in 186 pembrolizumab- and 44 avelumab-treated patients, respectively (chi-squared test, p=0.112). Regarding endocrine-related AEs, 12 (6.5%) and none (0%) were observed in pembrolizumab- and avelumab-treated patients, respectively (Fisher’s exact probability test, p=0.129). Conclusion: Pembrolizumab and maintenance avelumab therapy provide equivalent oncological outcomes in patients with advanced UC. Although no significant difference was observed, there might be a potential risk of higher endocrine-related AEs due to pembrolizumab compared to avelumab maintenance therapy.

Key Words:
  • Advanced urothelial carcinoma
  • pembrolizumab
  • avelumab
  • propensity score match
  • Received November 15, 2023.
  • Revision received December 3, 2023.
  • Accepted December 4, 2023.
  • Copyright © 2024 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.
View Full Text

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?

Purchase access

You may purchase access to this article. This will require you to create an account if you don't already have one.

patientACCESS

patientACCESS - Patients desiring access to articles
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research: 44 (3)
Anticancer Research
Vol. 44, Issue 3
March 2024
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Comparison of Oncological Outcomes of Pembrolizumab as Second-line Therapy and Maintenance Avelumab Therapy in Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma After Platinum-based Chemotherapy
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
4 + 14 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Comparison of Oncological Outcomes of Pembrolizumab as Second-line Therapy and Maintenance Avelumab Therapy in Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma After Platinum-based Chemotherapy
TETSUYA SHINDO, KOHEI HASHIMOTO, ATSUSHI TAKAHASHI, SHINTARO MIYAMOTO, YASUHARU KUNISHIMA, SHUNSUKE SATO, FUMIMASA FUKUTA, YOSHIKI HIYAMA, AKIO TAKAYANAGI, RYUICHI KATO, ATSUSHI WANIFUCHI, YOHEI UEKI, MANABU OKADA, HIDEKI ADACHI, KO KOBAYASHI, TOSHIAKI TANAKA, NAOYA MASUMORI
Anticancer Research Mar 2024, 44 (3) 1271-1279; DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.16922

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Comparison of Oncological Outcomes of Pembrolizumab as Second-line Therapy and Maintenance Avelumab Therapy in Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma After Platinum-based Chemotherapy
TETSUYA SHINDO, KOHEI HASHIMOTO, ATSUSHI TAKAHASHI, SHINTARO MIYAMOTO, YASUHARU KUNISHIMA, SHUNSUKE SATO, FUMIMASA FUKUTA, YOSHIKI HIYAMA, AKIO TAKAYANAGI, RYUICHI KATO, ATSUSHI WANIFUCHI, YOHEI UEKI, MANABU OKADA, HIDEKI ADACHI, KO KOBAYASHI, TOSHIAKI TANAKA, NAOYA MASUMORI
Anticancer Research Mar 2024, 44 (3) 1271-1279; DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.16922
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Patients and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Acknowledgements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

  • Survival and Safety Outcomes of Avelumab Maintenance Therapy for Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma from a Single-Center Experience
  • Efficacy of Pembrolizumab as Second or Third-line Therapy for Local Advanced and Metastatic Urothelial Cancer
  • Treatment Outcomes After Progression With Enfortumab Vedotin in Patients With Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma
  • Clinical Outcomes of Enfortumab Vedotin in Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma With Prior Avelumab Versus Pembrolizumab Therapy
  • Optimal Number of Cycles of First-line Platinum-based Chemotherapy for Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Evaluation of the Validity of Pancreatoduodenectomy for Elderly Patients With Ampullary Carcinoma from the Perspective of Nutritional Status at Recurrence
  • Real-world Analysis of Urinary Protein-to-Creatinine Ratio and Blood Pressure in Lenvatinib Therapy
  • Expression of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A in Gallbladder Cancer Cells: A Clinicopathological Study
Show more Clinical Studies

Keywords

  • Advanced urothelial carcinoma
  • Pembrolizumab
  • avelumab
  • propensity score match
Anticancer Research

© 2026 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire