Research ArticleExperimental Studies
Open Access

LET-7a and LET-7b as Potential Signatures for Glioma Recurrence, Regardless of WHO Tumor Grade

SYLVIE WEBER, SASKIA KUHL, ROLAND GOLDBRUNNER and MARCO TIMMER
Anticancer Research December 2024, 44 (12) 5199-5205; DOI: https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.17346

Abstract

Background/Aim: Micro RNAs (miRs; miRNAs) are small, non-coding RNA segments that influence gene expression. To do this, they bind to corresponding mRNA segments and inhibit the subsequent protein translation. Currently, about 200 transcripts are thought to be regulated by a single miRNA. Dysregulated miRNAs can act as tumor promoters as well as tumor suppressors. The aim of this study was to verify miR-LET-7a and miR-LET-7b as a signature for glioma recurrence detection by analyzing their expression in glioma tissue. Materials and Methods: Only patients with two or more recurrences of glioma (n=25) were included in the study (tissue samples, n=89). Tissue was obtained during neurosurgical procedures and shock-frozen in liquid nitrogen. The patient cohort (female:male=12:13) had an average age of 35 years when first diagnosed (primary tumor: 13 WHO grade II, 7 WHO grade III and 5 WHO grade IV) and 48 years in the fifth relapse. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction was performed to analyze miRNA expression. miR-151a-3p was used as an internal reference. Results: Expression of miR-LET-7a and miR-LET-7b was significantly lower in the first recurrence than in the primary tumor. The expression of miR-LET-7a and -7b significantly decreased with increasing tumor grade. The strongest down-regulation was found between WHO grade III and IV. In paired samples in which tumor grade did not change between the primary and the first recurrence, the expression of both miRNAs remained significantly lower in the recurrent than in the primary tumor. Conclusion: miR-LET-7a and miR-LET-7b represent a potential signature for glioma recurrence regardless of WHO grade.

Key Words:

Gliomas account for the largest proportion of neuroepithelial tumors. Classified into four grades by the 2016 edition of the World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System (1), grade IV glioblastoma is the most common and aggressive form, accounting for 59% of all gliomas (2). Despite current treatment options consisting of neurosurgical tumor resection combined with chemoradiotherapy, the median survival time is only about 15 months (3).

Molecular alterations for reliable tumor classification and patient’s prognosis are becoming more important. Alongside already established biomarkers, such as O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase methylation, 1p/19q co-deletion, and mutation of isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 or 2 gene (4), so-called microRNAs (miRs; miRNAs) represent potentially new markers for diagnosis, therapy and monitoring of brain tumors (5).

miRNAs are small, non-coding RNA segments with a length of approximate 20 nucleotides that influence gene expression as they bind to corresponding mRNA segments and inhibit the subsequent translation of proteins. In this way, a single miRNA can influence about 200 different transcripts, each of which is involved in different signaling pathways (6, 7).

When dysregulated, miRNAs can act as both tumor promoters and tumor suppressors. By controlling cellular processes, such as angiogenesis, proliferation or invasion, they play an important role in metastasis (8). To date, numerous miRNAs whose expression was either down- or up-regulated have been identified in glioma tumor tissue (5). Moreover, signatures consisting of multiple miRNAs have already been successfully verified which may help in the diagnosis of gliomas as well as in the prediction of prognosis in the future (9-11). Niyazi et al., for example, created a signature using miR-LET-7a, miR-LET-7b, miR-125a-5p, and miR-615-5p with the aim of being able to predict the therapeutic outcome of patients with glioblastoma. Therefore, high- and low-risk patient groups based on the expression level of these miRNAs were compared, resulting in a significantly shorter overall survival for the high-risk group (11).

Further studies also identified miR-LET-7a and miR-LET-7b as tumor suppressors in gliomas, being down-regulated in tumor compared to control tissue. Up-regulation of both miRNAs in glioma cell lines slowed tumor growth and thus makes them potential candidates for targeted therapy in the future (12-14). A correlation between tumor grade and expression levels of both miRNAs has also been demonstrated as the expression was lower in high-grade (WHO III and IV) than in low-grade (WHO II) tumors. In addition, lower expression of miR-LET-7a and miR-LET-7b in these tumors was associated with a poorer prognosis (12, 15). In 2018, another study investigated the expression levels of both LET-7 miRNAs in the first recurrence of glioblastoma in patients compared to the primary tumor. The expression was found to be significantly lower in the recurrent than in the primary tumor (16).

However, an analysis of the expression of miR-LET-7a and miR-LET-7b in the longitudinal course, i.e. beyond the first recurrence, has not been performed. In addition, only glioblastoma samples and thus high-grade tumors, were examined in the 2018 study. The aim of this study was therefore to verify miR-LET-7a and miR-LET-7b as a potential signature for relapse beyond the first recurrence and, more importantly, as a marker of recurrence of gliomas of any WHO grade.

Materials and Methods

Patients and tissue samples. Glioma tissue from 25 patients treated at the Department of Neurosurgery at the University Hospital of Cologne between 1991-2020 was investigated. For the selection of suitable tissue samples for the longitudinal study, it was a prerequisite that each patient had both primary glioma and at least two further recurrences (see Table I). A total of 89 tissue samples were examined, which were divided into grade II, III, and IV (see Table II) according to the 2016 WHO classification (1, 17).

View this table:
Table I.

Demographic and clinicopathological characteristics of patients included in the study.

View this table:
Table II.

Distribution of primary tumor and recurrences among World Health Organization (WHO) grades II-IV.

All tissue samples were collected during neurosurgical procedures at the University Hospital of Cologne, shock-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored long-term at −80°C.

The use of the samples for scientific purposes was according to the Helsinki declaration of ethical requirements and was approved by the local Ethical Committee of the University of Cologne (Application No. 03-170).

RNA isolation and cDNA synthesis. miRNAs were isolated from 30 mg of tumor tissue using miRNeasy Tissue Cells Advance Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and Tissue Lyser LTII. Reverse transcription was then performed using miScript LNA RT Kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer instructions with a reaction volume of 10 μl and 10 ng of RNA per sample. The RNA was quantified and purity measured using an Infinite® 200 PRO (Tecan, Männedorf, Switzerland) and then diluted to 5 ng/μl. In addition, an RNA Spike-In Kit (Qiagen) was used as a quality control for miRNA isolation, cDNA synthesis and quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR).

qPCR. Real-time PCR was performed using a miRCURY LNA SYBR Green PCR Kit (Qiagen) with the Rotor Gene-Q Real-Time PCR System (Qiagen) according to the protocol provided. The following program was used with a reaction volume of 20 μl for 50 cycles: 95°C for 2 min, 95°C for 10 s, and 56°C for 60 s. The manufacturer’s instructions originally specified a reaction volume of 10 μl, but we were unable to regenerate results with this until we doubled the volume of each reagent. Before examining the tissue samples in detail, a reagent pool was created from different cDNA samples to generate standard curves for each primer. Primers miR-LET-7a-5p and miR-LET-7b-5p were tested; miR-151a-3p served as internal reference (miRCURY LNA miRNA PCR Assay; Qiagen). All qPCR reactions were carried out twice. The relative expressions of the miRNAs were calculated using the Rotor Gene Q Series Software (Qiagen), as were the melting curves after each run to confirm amplification specificity.

Statistical analysis. GraphPad Prism 9.0 (GraphPad Software Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA) was used for all statistical analyses.

For the longitudinal expression analysis of miR-LET-7a and miR-LET-7b, and for comparison of expression by WHO grade, the Kruskal–Wallis test was applied. For analyses of paired samples, as in the study of expression behavior in the primary tumor compared with the first relapse, the Wilcoxon signed-rank test was performed. The comparison of miRNA expressions between high- and low-grade tumors was analyzed by Mann–Whitney test. Recurrence-free survival was analyzed using Kaplan–Meier curves and the Mantel–Cox test was performed to compare the curves of recurrence-free survival. To measure recurrence-free survival, the period between the day of surgery for the primary tumor and surgery for the first recurrence was determined. In parallel, the difference between the expression values of miR-LET-7a and miR-LET-7b in the primary tumor and the first recurrence was calculated. After calculating the mean value from the expression rates of both miRNAs, patients with miR-LET-7a or miR-LET-7b expression above the mean value were classified as having high expression, patients with values below the mean value were classified as having low expression. Results were considered to be statistically significant when p<0.05.

Results

Firstly, the longitudinal expression of miR-LET-7a and miR-LET-7b from primary tumor until fifth relapse was analyzed (Figure 1). The number of patients in each group and the WHO classification of the tumor samples are shown in Table II. For both miR-LET-7a and miR-LET-7b, a trend for decreasing expression was found in the longitudinal course of the disease. When comparing the primary tumor with the first relapse, expression of miR-LET-7a and miR-LET-7b was significantly lower in the latter (Figure 2). Even if the tumor grade stayed stable, a lower expression in the first relapse was found, showing that this finding occurred independently of malignancy of the tumor.

Figure 1.
Figure 1.

Illustration of the expression of miR-LET-7a (A) and miR-LET-7b (B) in the primary tumor and up to and including the fifth relapse.

Figure 2.
Figure 2.

Expression of miR-LET-7a and miR-LET-7b comparing (A) the first recurrence with the primary tumor and (B) primary tumor and recurrence of the same tumor grade (SG) (WHO II: n=4, WHO III: n=6, and WHO IV: n=5). Significantly different at: *p<0.05, **p<0.01, and ***p<0.001.

We next wanted to know whether expression of miR-LET-7a and miR-LET-7b is influenced by tumor grade. Our results show significantly lower miR-LET-7a/b levels with higher tumor grades. This was true for low- versus high-grade tumors and also when comparing WHO grades II to IV (Figure 3). The analysis of miR-LET-7a showed a significantly lower mean expression in the high-grade tumors compared to low-grade tumors (p<0.05, low grade: 1.715±1.604 vs. high grade: 1.175±0.715) (Figure 2A). The same pattern was found for miR-LET-7b (p<0.05, low grade: 0.934±0.740 vs. high grade: 0.688±0.480) (Figure 2B).

Figure 3.
Figure 3.

Expression of miR-LET-7a and miR-LET-7b depending on the 2016 WHO classification of tumor grade. (A) Expression compared in low-grade (II) and high-grade (III+IV) tumors. (B) Expression according to tumor grade. Significantly different at: *p<0.05, ***p<0.001 and ****p<0.0001.

Thus, miR-LET-7a showed the lowest expression in WHO grade IV compared to grade II and III. The strongest reduction in expression was observed between grade III and IV.

Lastly, recurrence-free survival according to high and low miR-LET-7a and miR-LET-7b expression was evaluated. There was a tendency for longer recurrence-free survival in patients with high miR-LET-7a expression compared to patients with low expression (Figure 4).

Figure 4.
Figure 4.

Recurrence-free survival in patients according to miR- LET-7a (A) and miR- LET-7b (B) expression. (A) Using a cut-off of 1.42 for miR- LET-7a expression, the median times to recurrence for the groups with low and high expression were 29 versus 47.5 months, respectively (p=0.9). (B) Using a cut-off of 0.83 for miR- LET-7b expression, the median times to recurrence for the groups with low and high expression were 36 versus 31 months, respectively (p=0.6).

Discussion

Gliomas constitute the largest proportion of malignant primary tumors of the brain and central nervous system, accounting for nearly 80% (2). It is known that dysregulation of miRNAs plays a significant role in both tumor pathogenesis and progression. A recent review by Alireza et al. summarizes numerous miRNAs discovered in glioma tissue and their function at the cellular level or in connection with tumor pathogenesis (5).

The LET-7 family, which includes miR-LET-7a, miR-LET-7b as well as 11 other members, was the first miRNA family found in the human genome (18, 19). Since then, this family has been identified as both oncogenic and tumor-suppressive in different cancer types (20). With respect to gliomas, miR-LET-7a and miR-LET-7b have been predominantly described as tumor suppressors (12-14).

It has been shown that an increase in expression of both miRNAs reduces tumor growth and malignant behavior of glioma cells, and that a lower expression is associated with a poorer prognosis (12-15). Thus, previous studies have demonstrated lower expression in patients with prognostically less favorable high-grade tumors compared to those with low-grade tumors (12, 15). In contrast, the attempt to establish a signature that can indicate recurrence in the longitudinal course of a patient has hardly been undertaken. To the best of our knowledge, there are only two studies to date that have detected a significant change in expression of various miRNAs in the first glioblastoma recurrence compared with the primary tumor, including miR-LET-7a and miR-LET-7b (16, 21).

The aim of our study was to extend the expression analysis of miR-LET-7a and miR-LET-7b up to the fifth relapse and to analyze all glioma classes to verify a universal relapse signature.

Longitudinal expression of miR-LET-7a and miR-LET-7b and comparison of recurrence-free survival. No consistent results were generated for the expression of these two miRNAs in the longitudinal course nor in the comparison of their expression by recurrence-free survival. In the longitudinal expression analysis, there were no other significant differences except for the down-regulation of miR-LET-7a and miR-LET-7b in the first recurrence and the primary tumor. However, it is evident for both miRNAs that all recurrences tended to have lower expression compared to the primary tumor. In addition, there was a tendency for decreasing expression up to the fifth recurrence. This, however, needs to be verified with a higher number of patients, as the number of samples was low, especially for the fourth and fifth relapses (n=5 and n=1, respectively).

Moreover, as shown by the Kaplan–Meier curve, only a tendency towards longer recurrence-free survival was detected with higher miR-LET-7a expression. Studies with a larger patient number may clarify this notable correlation.

Significant down-regulation of miR-LET-7a and miR-LET-7b in the first relapse, independent of WHO tumor grade. We found significant down-regulation of miR-LET-7a and miR-LET-7b in the first recurrence compared with the associated primary tumor. In addition, paired samples in which the WHO grade remained the same in the first relapse as in the primary were examined separately to exclude the possibility that the lower miRNA expression was only due to a higher WHO grade in the first relapse. This analysis showed consistent, significant down-regulation of both miRNAs in the first relapse.

Thus, to the best of our knowledge, we demonstrated for the first time that miR-LET-7a and miR-LET-7b are down-regulated not only in glioblastoma recurrences (16, 21), but also in all other glioma types and independently of the WHO tumor grade.

Correlation between expression level and WHO tumor grade. On the one hand, we were able to replicate the previously demonstrated finding of lower miR-LET-7a and miR-LET-7b expression with higher tumor malignancy (WHO III and IV) compared to low-grade tumors (WHO II) (12, 15). Secondly, we newly demonstrated significant down-regulation of both miRNAs not only from low- to high-grade tumors, but also within the high-grade group, i.e. between grades III and IV, where, according to our study the strongest down-regulation of miR-LET-7a and miR-LET-7b occurred. This result supports previous studies that showed up-regulation of these tumor-suppressive miRNAs, which not only led to reduced tumor growth but also reduced malignancy (12, 14). Conversely, this means decreasing expression of miR-LET-7a and miR-LET-7b with increasing grade may explain the worsened prognosis in patients with glioblastoma compared to those with other glioma classes (22, 23).

Future perspectives. Firstly, it would be useful to confirm the results generated here in a study with a larger number of patients as we only had 25 cases that met our criteria of at least two recurrences and, of these, only one patient had a fifth recurrence. Moreover, in a future longitudinal study with a larger cohort, it would be interesting to confirm or refute the trend for down-regulation of miR-LET-7a and miR-LET-7b shown here.

The next step would be to move towards clinical application and verify miR-LET-7a and miR-LET-7b in blood samples from patients with glioma of any WHO class as signatures of recurrence. Expression analysis of miRNAs in blood samples from patients with glioma has been successful in previous studies (24-26). For example, only recently Billur et al. demonstrated that miRNA582-5p and miRNA-363 were up-regulated in glioblastoma samples compared with normal tissue (26).

Conclusion

miR-LET-7a and miR-LET-7b represent a potential signature of recurrence for gliomas of any WHO grade.

Footnotes

  • Authors’ Contributions

    SW: Experimental work, writing of manuscript; SK: reading and correcting of manuscript, experiments; RG: correcting of manuscript; MT: idea, concept, manuscript revision, supervision.

  • Conflicts of Interest

    The Authors declare no potential conflicts of interest exist with respect to the research, authorship, or publication of this article

  • Funding

    This study was supported by the Koeln Fortune Program/Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Germany.

  • Received May 2, 2024.
  • Revision received October 25, 2024.
  • Accepted October 30, 2024.

This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 international license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0).

References

  1. ↵
    1. Onizuka H,
    2. Masui K,
    3. Komori T
    : Diffuse gliomas to date and beyond 2016 WHO Classification of Tumours of the Central Nervous System. Int J Clin Oncol 25(6): 997-1003, 2020. DOI: 10.1007/s10147-020-01695-w
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Ostrom QT,
    2. Wright CH,
    3. Barnholtz-Sloan JS
    : Brain metastases: epidemiology. Handb Clin Neurol 149: 27-42, 2018. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-811161-1.00002-5
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Witthayanuwat S,
    2. Pesee M,
    3. Supaadirek C,
    4. Supakalin N,
    5. Thamronganantasakul K,
    6. Krusun S
    : Survival analysis of glioblastoma multiforme. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 19(9): 2613-2617, 2018. DOI: 10.22034/APJCP.2018.19.9.2613
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Ludwig K,
    2. Kornblum HI
    : Molecular markers in glioma. J Neurooncol 134(3): 505-512, 2017. DOI: 10.1007/s11060-017-2379-y
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Mafi A,
    2. Rahmati A,
    3. Babaei Aghdam Z,
    4. Salami R,
    5. Salami M,
    6. Vakili O,
    7. Aghadavod E
    : Recent insights into the microRNA-dependent modulation of gliomas from pathogenesis to diagnosis and treatment. Cell Mol Biol Lett 27(1): 65, 2022. DOI: 10.1186/s11658-022-00354-4
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Erson AE,
    2. Petty EM
    : MicroRNAs in development and disease. Clin Genet 74(4): 296-306, 2008. DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2008.01076.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Krek A,
    2. Grün D,
    3. Poy MN,
    4. Wolf R,
    5. Rosenberg L,
    6. Epstein EJ,
    7. MacMenamin P,
    8. da Piedade I,
    9. Gunsalus KC,
    10. Stoffel M,
    11. Rajewsky N
    : Combinatorial microRNA target predictions. Nat Genet 37(5): 495-500, 2005. DOI: 10.1038/ng1536
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Rupaimoole R,
    2. Slack FJ
    : MicroRNA therapeutics: towards a new era for the management of cancer and other diseases. Nat Rev Drug Discov 16(3): 203-222, 2017. DOI: 10.1038/nrd.2016.246
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Zhou Q,
    2. Liu J,
    3. Quan J,
    4. Liu W,
    5. Tan H,
    6. Li W
    : MicroRNAs as potential biomarkers for the diagnosis of glioma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Sci 109(9): 2651-2659, 2018. DOI: 10.1111/cas.13714
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Rezaei O,
    2. Honarmand K,
    3. Nateghinia S,
    4. Taheri M,
    5. Ghafouri-Fard S
    : miRNA signature in glioblastoma: Potential biomarkers and therapeutic targets. Exp Mol Pathol 117: 104550, 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.yexmp.2020.104550
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Niyazi M,
    2. Pitea A,
    3. Mittelbronn M,
    4. Steinbach J,
    5. Sticht C,
    6. Zehentmayr F,
    7. Piehlmaier D,
    8. Zitzelsberger H,
    9. Ganswindt U,
    10. Rödel C,
    11. Lauber K,
    12. Belka C,
    13. Unger K
    : A 4-miRNA signature predicts the therapeutic outcome of glioblastoma. Oncotarget 7(29): 45764-45775, 2016. DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.9945
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Wang XR,
    2. Luo H,
    3. Li HL,
    4. Cao L,
    5. Wang XF,
    6. Yan W,
    7. Wang YY,
    8. Zhang JX,
    9. Jiang T,
    10. Kang CS,
    11. Liu N,
    12. You YP, Chinese Glioma Cooperative Group (CGCG)
    : Overexpressed let-7a inhibits glioma cell malignancy by directly targeting K-ras, independently of PTEN. Neuro Oncol 15(11): 1491-1501, 2013. DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/not107
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Buonfiglioli A,
    2. Efe IE,
    3. Guneykaya D,
    4. Ivanov A,
    5. Huang Y,
    6. Orlowski E,
    7. Krüger C,
    8. Deisz RA,
    9. Markovic D,
    10. Flüh C,
    11. Newman AG,
    12. Schneider UC,
    13. Beule D,
    14. Wolf SA,
    15. Dzaye O,
    16. Gutmann DH,
    17. Semtner M,
    18. Kettenmann H,
    19. Lehnardt S
    : let-7 microRNAs regulate microglial function and suppress glioma growth through toll-like receptor 7. Cell Rep 29(11): 3460-3471.e7, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.11.029
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Song H,
    2. Zhang Y,
    3. Liu N,
    4. Zhang D,
    5. Wan C,
    6. Zhao S,
    7. Kong Y,
    8. Yuan L
    : Let-7b inhibits the malignant behavior of glioma cells and glioma stem-like cells via downregulation of E2F2. J Physiol Biochem 72(4): 733-744, 2016. DOI: 10.1007/s13105-016-0512-6
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Zhang W,
    2. Zhao W,
    3. Ge C,
    4. Li X,
    5. Yang X,
    6. Xiang Y,
    7. Sun Z
    : Decreased let-7b is associated with poor prognosis in glioma. Medicine (Baltimore) 98(22): e15784, 2019. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000015784
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Matos B,
    2. Bostjancic E,
    3. Matjasic A,
    4. Popovic M,
    5. Glavac D
    : Dynamic expression of 11 miRNAs in 83 consecutive primary and corresponding recurrent glioblastoma: correlation to treatment, time to recurrence, overall survival and MGMT methylation status. Radiol Oncol 52(4): 422-432, 2018. DOI: 10.2478/raon-2018-0043
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Louis DN,
    2. Perry A,
    3. Reifenberger G,
    4. von Deimling A,
    5. Figarella-Branger D,
    6. Cavenee WK,
    7. Ohgaki H,
    8. Wiestler OD,
    9. Kleihues P,
    10. Ellison DW
    : The 2016 World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: a summary. Acta Neuropathol 131(6): 803-820, 2016. DOI: 10.1007/s00401-016-1545-1
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Pasquinelli AE,
    2. Reinhart BJ,
    3. Slack F,
    4. Martindale MQ,
    5. Kuroda MI,
    6. Maller B,
    7. Hayward DC,
    8. Ball EE,
    9. Degnan B,
    10. Müller P,
    11. Spring J,
    12. Srinivasan A,
    13. Fishman M,
    14. Finnerty J,
    15. Corbo J,
    16. Levine M,
    17. Leahy P,
    18. Davidson E,
    19. Ruvkun G
    : Conservation of the sequence and temporal expression of let-7 heterochronic regulatory RNA. Nature 408(6808): 86-89, 2000. DOI: 10.1038/35040556
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Roush S,
    2. Slack FJ
    : The let-7 family of microRNAs. Trends Cell Biol 18(10): 505-516, 2008. DOI: 10.1016/j.tcb.2008.07.007
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Boyerinas B,
    2. Park SM,
    3. Hau A,
    4. Murmann AE,
    5. Peter ME
    : The role of let-7 in cell differentiation and cancer. Endocr Relat Cancer 17(1): F19-F36, 2010. DOI: 10.1677/ERC-09-0184
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Bo LJ,
    2. Wei B,
    3. Li ZH,
    4. Wang ZF,
    5. Gao Z,
    6. Miao Z
    : Bioinformatics analysis of miRNA expression profile between primary and recurrent glioblastoma. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 19(19): 3579-3586, 2015.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Vargas López A,
    2. Fernández Carballal C,
    3. Valera Melé M,
    4. Rodríguez-Boto G
    : Survival analysis in high-grade glioma: The role of salvage surgery. Neurologia 38(1): 21-28, 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.nrleng.2020.04.032
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Liang J,
    2. Lv X,
    3. Lu C,
    4. Ye X,
    5. Chen X,
    6. Fu J,
    7. Luo C,
    8. Zhao Y
    : Prognostic factors of patients with Gliomas – an analysis on 335 patients with Glioblastoma and other forms of Gliomas. BMC Cancer 20(1): 35, 2020. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-019-6511-6
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Wang J,
    2. Che F,
    3. Zhang J,
    4. Zhang M,
    5. Xiao S,
    6. Liu Y,
    7. Zhou L,
    8. Su Q,
    9. You C,
    10. Lu Y,
    11. Heng X
    : Diagnostic and prognostic potential of serum cell-free microRNA-214 in glioma. World Neurosurg 125: e1217-e1225, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.02.009
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Xu W,
    2. Huang L,
    3. Xie B,
    4. Yang B
    : Serum microRNA-4297 is a sex-specific predictive biomarker of glioma grade and prognosis. Front Neurol 13: 888221, 2022. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.888221
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Billur D,
    2. Gulec Yilmaz S,
    3. Yaltirik CK,
    4. Ozdogan S,
    5. Ture U,
    6. Isbir T
    : Serum mirna-582-5p and mirna-363 as potential non-invasive biomarkers for glioblastoma multiforme. Turk Neurosurg 2022. DOI: 10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.35541-21.3
    OpenUrlCrossRef
Back to top

In this issue

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Email Article
Citation Tools
Reprints and Permissions
LET-7a and LET-7b as Potential Signatures for Glioma Recurrence, Regardless of WHO Tumor Grade
SYLVIE WEBER, SASKIA KUHL, ROLAND GOLDBRUNNER, MARCO TIMMER
Anticancer Research Dec 2024, 44 (12) 5199-5205; DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.17346
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo

Jump to section

Keywords