Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues 2025
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues 2025
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleClinical Studies
Open Access

Opioid Use in Patients With Cervical Cancer at a Tertiary Academic Medical Center

MADISON NICHOLS, ANAM KESARIA, HORACE J. SPENCER, HEATHER R. WILLIAMS, SANTANU SAMANTA and GARY D. LEWIS
Anticancer Research January 2024, 44 (1) 151-155; DOI: https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.16797
MADISON NICHOLS
1Department of Radiation Oncology, Winthrop P. Rockefeller Cancer Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, U.S.A.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
ANAM KESARIA
1Department of Radiation Oncology, Winthrop P. Rockefeller Cancer Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, U.S.A.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
HORACE J. SPENCER
2Department of Biostatistics, Winthrop P. Rockefeller Cancer Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, U.S.A.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
HEATHER R. WILLIAMS
3Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Winthrop P. Rockefeller Cancer Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, U.S.A.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
SANTANU SAMANTA
1Department of Radiation Oncology, Winthrop P. Rockefeller Cancer Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, U.S.A.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
GARY D. LEWIS
1Department of Radiation Oncology, Winthrop P. Rockefeller Cancer Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, U.S.A.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: lewis.garyd@gmail.com
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background/Aim: Opioids are a common treatment for cancer-related pain and information is limited on the rates of opioid use for cervical cancer patients. This study aimed to analyze outpatient opioid use and various predictors among patients with cervical cancer at a tertiary academic medical center. Patients and Methods: Data from patients with cervical cancer receiving treatment at a single institution, from August 2019 to July 2022, were retrospectively collected. Women with unrelated chronic opioid use or opioid use associated with acute inpatient stays were excluded. Charts were reviewed for patient demographics, disease characteristics, treatment characteristics, disease outcomes, and opioid prescriptions. The primary endpoint was duration of opioid use ≥6 months. Pearson’s chi-squared testing, Welch’s two-sample t-testing and Fisher’s exact testing were used to determine predictors of opioid use ≥6 months. Results: In total, 108 patients with cervical cancer (76.1%) of the 142 that received treatment were prescribed opioids. In women who were prescribed outpatient opioids, the median duration of opioid use was 69 days (interquartile range=5-359 days). In total, 40 (37.0%) had prescriptions for ≥180 days and 27 (25.0%) had prescriptions ≥365 days. On bivariate analysis, lower stage and receipt of surgery were associated with opioid use duration <6 months. Age, race, histology, substance/tobacco/alcohol use, depression/anxiety, and the receipt of brachytherapy/radiation were not associated with length of opioid prescriptions. Conclusion: This study demonstrated that 37% of patients with cervical cancer were using opioids for cancer-related pain longer than 6 months. Higher stage was associated with opioid use duration ≥6 months.

Key Words:
  • Cervical cancer
  • opioid use
  • surgery
  • radiation
  • chemotherapy

Cervical cancer is the third most common in incidence and cause of death among gynecologic cancers in the United States and the fourth most common cancer overall in females with a lifetime risk of 0.7% (1). The most common clinical manifestation is pain, often shifting from a treatment-related symptom to a chronic problem post-treatment in many patients. While early cervical cancer is often asymptomatic, with advanced disease the primary complaint is chronic pelvic or back pain (2). Common treatment regimens for cervical cancer include surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy (2). These treatment modalities have different chronic pain syndromes with surgery potentially causing lasting lymphedema, neuralgia, and chronic back/pelvic pain, radiation potentially causing vaginal stenosis, pelvic insufficiency fractures, and myelopathy, and chemotherapy potentially causing osteoporosis/osteonecrosis and chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (3).

Reports suggest that cervical cancer patients at the time of recurrence/presentation have higher rates of opioid use compared to other cancer types (4-6). However, there is minimal data on opioid prescription patterns after initial treatment (surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation) has been completed. As a result, it is critical to examine and understand the use of opioids in this patient population. This study aimed to analyze outpatient opioid use and various predictors among patients with cervical cancer at a tertiary academic medical center.

Patients and Methods

Data from patients with cervical cancer receiving curative treatment at a single institution, from August 2019 to July 2022, were retrospectively collected. All patients received multidisciplinary evaluation prior to treatment from gynecologic oncology, radiation oncology, pathology, and genetics specialists. A waiver of informed consent was provided by our institutional review board due to the minimal risk posed to study participants.

Charts were reviewed for patient demographics, disease characteristics, treatment characteristics, disease outcomes, and opioid prescriptions. Clinical and demographic data was abstracted using institutional electronic medical records. The 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging was used to classify patients’ stages. Women with unrelated chronic opioid use or opioids use associated with acute inpatient stays were excluded. “Outpatient opioid use” was defined as any outpatient opioid prescription, including postprocedural medications. Duration of opioid use was determined by counting days and months of written prescriptions for any opioid in the electronic medical record. The primary endpoint was duration of opioid use ≥180 days. Pearson’s chi-squared testing, Welch’s two-sample t-testing and Fisher’s exact testing were used to determine predictors of opioid use ≥180 days.

Results

From August 2019 to July 2022, 108 patients, constituting 76.1% of the 142 individuals who received treatment for cervical cancer, were prescribed opioids. The mean age at diagnosis was 47.3 years. Patient and treatment characteristics of patients prescribed opioids are included in Table I. The majority of patients receiving opioids were white (73.1%), had Stage I disease (56.5%), and had squamous cell carcinoma histology (69.4%). Surgery was the most prevalent treatment modality (48.1%). The majority reported a tobacco use history (59.3%), but substance use (6.5%) and alcohol use (1.9%) were less common. Additionally, depression and anxiety were present in 25% and 23.1% of patients.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

Demographic and medical characteristics of patients with cervical cancer who were prescribed opioids at some point in their treatment.

Opioid prescription types are presented in Table II and Figure 1. In women who were prescribed outpatient opioids, the median duration of opioid use was 69 days (interquartile range 5-359 days). In total, 40 (37.0%) had prescriptions for ≥180 days and 27 (25.0%) had prescriptions ≥365 days. The single most commonly prescribed opioid was oxycodone (50.1%). Multiple opioid prescriptions were used in one-third of patients (33.3%). In terms of predictors of opioid use, higher stage was statistically associated with opioid use ≥180 days (p<0.0001). For example, for patients prescribed opiates <180 days, 75% were stage I while for those using opiates ≥180 days, the highest percentage (42.5%) of patients were stage III. Since early-stage patients are the only appropriate candidates for surgical resection, patients undergoing surgery were statistically significantly associated with opioid prescriptions <180 days (p=0.0020). Age, race, histology, substance/tobacco/alcohol use, depression/anxiety, and the receipt of brachytherapy/radiation were not associated with length of opioid prescriptions.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table II.

Opioid prescription characteristics.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Types of opioids prescribed.

Discussion

This study sought to explore outpatient opioid use of cervical cancer patients along with various predictors, and the findings demonstrated that for all cervical cancer patients treated at our institution, 76.1% were given at least one prescription for opioids. Of the 108 patients prescribed opioids, 40 (37.0%) had prescriptions for 180 days (~6 months) or more and 27 (25.0%) had prescriptions lasting longer than 365 days (1 year).

This rate of opioid usage among cervical cancer patients is greater than that of opioid use for chronic pain in cancer survivors in general (7). However, our reported incidence of long term (>6 month) opioid use is similar to results from other series. In a series of 106 patients with cervical cancer treated at two urban medical centers, Arya et al. reported 35.2% and 22% of patients had an opioid prescription lasting longer than six and 12 months, respectively (8). In a study specific to patients with cervical cancer receiving radiation, Ward et al. reported that 25% of the 96 patients included in the study were still using opioids 6 months after radiation (9).

In terms of predictors of long-term opioid use, we found that higher stage was associated with use ≥180 days. This makes sense for multiple reasons. Patients with higher stage disease have larger, more advanced tumors that are invading more normal tissues, contributing to pain symptoms. In addition, these patients often require more treatment modalities and more invasive treatment techniques (interstitial brachytherapy) that contribute to morbidity and pain. Finally, these patients are at highest risk for recurrence; pelvic recurrences can cause debilitating pain. We also found that surgery as primary treatment was associated with short term opioid use (<180 days). This correlates with our finding of stage as a predictor for opioid use duration. Surgical treatment of cervical cancer is generally reserved for early stage patients with small volume disease and lower risks of recurrence (2). As a result, these patients would be at lower risk of long-term opioid use. Increased emphasis on adherence to established cervical cancer screening guidelines would allow for earlier detection of disease and less morbid treatment options.

Other previously reported risks factors for persistent opioid use include mental health disorders (such as depression and anxiety), tobacco use, alcohol use, and/or other substance use (10, 11). While these disorders were present in our cohort of patients, they were not significantly associated with opioid use ≥180 days amongst our patients. Several reasons may be responsible for this, including inaccuracies in reporting from patients and/or healthcare providers and bias against using opioids in patients with these risk factors. Previous studies have noted that alcohol and substance abuse disorders are typically under-reported and under-documented in patients (12, 13). This is important as prescribing opioids in these patients can put them at risk for increased side effects and complications. In addition, recent data suggests that patients with cervical cancer are more likely to be screened as a moderate to high risk for opioid misuse compared to women with other gynecologic malignancies (14). Therefore, careful history taking is necessary when prescribing opioids.

This is not to say that opioids should not be used as patients with cervical cancer have been found to require more opioids than those with other gynecologic malignancies (6). The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and the Society of Gynecologic Oncology (SGO) advocate that steps should be taken to decrease opioid misuse, but that these should not interfere with access to opioids for cancer-related pain (15). Brief screening tools have been developed to predict individuals that may develop aberrant behaviors when prescribed opioids for chronic pain with great specificity and sensitivity, such as the self-administered Opioid Risk Tool (10). Chronic pain management guidelines recommend a multidisciplinary approach that uses multiple modalities that provide comfort and function for daily life and includes pharmacologic treatment, cognitive-behavioral methods, physical medicine and rehabilitation, integrative medicine, and interventional approaches. Regarding pharmacologic approaches, there is weak evidence that long-term continuation of opioids provides clinically significant pain relief in chronic non-cancer pain despite increased usage (7). Studies have found that opioid abuse and dependence are diagnosed in a small minority of patients receiving chronic opioid therapy, but this may be underestimated (11).

The strengths of this study include the relatively large sample size and consistency of how the data of prescriptions provided to patients has been collected within the same electronic medical record modality, and it has been collected over a time span of 3 years that has consisted of similar treatment approaches. The limitations of this study are the retrospective nature of the data collection, the cohort coming from a single tertiary academic center, and that the data included only prescriptions given and not the actual usage of the prescriptions.

Conclusion

In this single institution review of cervical cancer patients, we found a significant percentage of patients prescribed opioids received long term prescriptions and that higher stage disease was associated with persistent opioid use. Providers should strive for decreased opioid use after treatment among this cancer patient population while still providing adequate pain control. This includes future exploration into non-opiate therapy for cancer-related chronic pain, earlier engagement of palliative care specialists and increased awareness of provider opioid stewardship.

Acknowledgements

The study was supported by the Biostatistics Shared Resource of University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Winthrop P. Rockefeller Cancer Institute.

Footnotes

  • Authors’ Contributions

    NM: Methodology, Investigation, Visualization. AK: Methodology, Investigation, Data Curation. HJS: Formal Analysis, Data Curation. HRW: Conceptualization, Writing – Review & Editing, Supervision. SS: Conceptualization, Writing – Review & Editing, Supervision. GDL: Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Data Curation, Writing – Original Draft, Writing – Review & Editing, Visualization, Supervision, Project administration.

  • Conflicts of Interest

    The Authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose in relation to this study.

  • Received November 9, 2023.
  • Revision received November 30, 2023.
  • Accepted December 1, 2023.
  • Copyright © 2024 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.

This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 international license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0).

References

  1. ↵
    1. Siegel RL,
    2. Miller KD,
    3. Wagle NS,
    4. Jemal A
    : Cancer statistics, 2023. CA Cancer J Clin 73(1): 17-48, 2023. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21763
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Johnson CA,
    2. James D,
    3. Marzan A,
    4. Armaos M
    : Cervical cancer: an overview of pathophysiology and management. Semin Oncol Nurs 35(2): 166-174, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.soncn.2019.02.003
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Levy MH,
    2. Chwistek M,
    3. Mehta RS
    : Management of chronic pain in cancer survivors. Cancer J (Sudbury, Mass) 14(6): 401-409, 2008. DOI: 10.1097/PPO.0b013e31818f5aa7
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  4. ↵
    1. Caraceni A,
    2. Hanks G,
    3. Kaasa S,
    4. Bennett MI,
    5. Brunelli C,
    6. Cherny N,
    7. Dale O,
    8. De Conno F,
    9. Fallon M,
    10. Hanna M,
    11. Haugen DF,
    12. Juhl G,
    13. King S,
    14. Klepstad P,
    15. Laugsand EA,
    16. Maltoni M,
    17. Mercadante S,
    18. Nabal M,
    19. Pigni A,
    20. Radbruch L,
    21. Reid C,
    22. Sjogren P,
    23. Stone PC,
    24. Tassinari D,
    25. Zeppetella G
    : Use of opioid analgesics in the treatment of cancer pain: evidence-based recommendations from the EAPC. Lancet Oncol 13(2): e58-e68, 2012. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70040-2
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Jarlbaek L,
    2. Hansen DG,
    3. Bruera E,
    4. Andersen M
    : Frequency of opioid use in a population of cancer patients during the trajectory of the disease. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 22(3): 199-207, 2010. DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2009.12.002
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Utsumi F,
    2. Kajiyama H,
    3. Sakata J,
    4. Higashi M,
    5. Niimi K,
    6. Sekiya R,
    7. Mitsui H,
    8. Suzuki S,
    9. Umezu T,
    10. Mizuno M,
    11. Yamamoto E,
    12. Shibata K,
    13. Kikkawa F
    : Opioid needs of terminally ill patients with gynecologic malignancies. Int J Clin Oncol 20(2): 405-410, 2015. DOI: 10.1007/s10147-014-0708-0
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Glare PA,
    2. Davies PS,
    3. Finlay E,
    4. Gulati A,
    5. Lemanne D,
    6. Moryl N,
    7. Oeffinger KC,
    8. Paice JA,
    9. Stubblefield MD,
    10. Syrjala KL
    : Pain in cancer survivors. J Clin Oncol 32(16): 1739-1747, 2014. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2013.52.4629
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    1. Arya R,
    2. Hong D,
    3. Schultz O,
    4. Jutzy JM,
    5. Cotangco K,
    6. Peters P,
    7. Daily EW,
    8. McCall AR,
    9. Howard AR,
    10. Hasan Y,
    11. Kothari R,
    12. Son CH
    : Opioid use in patients with cervical cancer at two urban medical centers. Adv Radiat Oncol 7(2): 100833, 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2021.100833
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Ward K,
    2. Ramzan A,
    3. Sheeder J,
    4. Fischer S,
    5. Lefkowits C
    : Persistent opioid use after radiation therapy in opioid-naive cervical cancer survivors. Int J Gynecol Cancer 29(7): 1105-1109, 2019. DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2019-000430
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. Webster LR,
    2. Webster RM
    : Predicting aberrant behaviors in opioid-treated patients: Preliminary validation of the opioid risk tool. Pain Med (Malden, Mass) 6(6): 432-442, 2005. DOI: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2005.00072.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Edlund MJ,
    2. Martin BC,
    3. Fan MY,
    4. Devries A,
    5. Braden JB,
    6. Sullivan MD
    : Risks for opioid abuse and dependence among recipients of chronic opioid therapy: results from the TROUP study. Drug Alcohol Depend 112(1-2): 90-98, 2010. DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2010.05.017
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Parsons HA,
    2. Delgado-Guay MO,
    3. El Osta B,
    4. Chacko R,
    5. Poulter V,
    6. Palmer JL,
    7. Bruera E
    : Alcoholism screening in patients with advanced cancer: impact on symptom burden and opioid use. J Palliat Med 11(7): 964-968, 2008. DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2008.0037
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Dev R,
    2. Parsons HA,
    3. Palla S,
    4. Palmer JL,
    5. Del Fabbro E,
    6. Bruera E
    : Undocumented alcoholism and its correlation with tobacco and illegal drug use in advanced cancer patients. Cancer 117(19): 4551-4556, 2011. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.26082
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Garcia C,
    2. Lefkowits C,
    3. Pelkofski E,
    4. Blackhall L,
    5. Duska LR
    : Prospective screening with the validated Opioid Risk Tool demonstrates gynecologic oncology patients are at low risk for opioid misuse. Gynecol Oncol 147(2): 456-459, 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.08.008
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Page R,
    2. Blanchard E
    : Opioids and cancer pain: Patients’ needs and access challenges. J Oncol Practice 15(5): 229-231, 2019. DOI: 10.1200/JOP.19.00081
    OpenUrlCrossRef
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research: 44 (1)
Anticancer Research
Vol. 44, Issue 1
January 2024
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Opioid Use in Patients With Cervical Cancer at a Tertiary Academic Medical Center
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
3 + 3 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Opioid Use in Patients With Cervical Cancer at a Tertiary Academic Medical Center
MADISON NICHOLS, ANAM KESARIA, HORACE J. SPENCER, HEATHER R. WILLIAMS, SANTANU SAMANTA, GARY D. LEWIS
Anticancer Research Jan 2024, 44 (1) 151-155; DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.16797

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Opioid Use in Patients With Cervical Cancer at a Tertiary Academic Medical Center
MADISON NICHOLS, ANAM KESARIA, HORACE J. SPENCER, HEATHER R. WILLIAMS, SANTANU SAMANTA, GARY D. LEWIS
Anticancer Research Jan 2024, 44 (1) 151-155; DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.16797
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Patients and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Acknowledgements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Impact of Surgery Refusal on Overall Survival in Merkel Cell Carcinoma
  • Association of County-level Social Determinants and Pancreatic Cancer Incidence in the United States
  • Efficacy and Treatment Outcomes of First-line Pazopanib Therapy in Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma in Greece
Show more Clinical Studies

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • cervical cancer
  • opioid use
  • surgery
  • radiation
  • Chemotherapy
Anticancer Research

© 2025 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire