Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues 2025
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues 2025
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleExperimental Studies
Open Access

Inhibitory Effect of Pyra–Metho–Carnil on Cancer Spheroid Growth Through Decrease in Glycolysis-associated Molecules

KAZUMASA YOSHIDA, KENSUKE NISHI, SHUHEI ISHIKURA, TAICHI MATSUMOTO, KAZUHIKO NAKABAYASHI, RYO YAZAKI, TAKASHI OHSHIMA, MASAHIKO SUENAGA, SENJI SHIRASAWA and TOSHIYUKI TSUNODA
Anticancer Research August 2023, 43 (8) 3717-3726; DOI: https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.16556
KAZUMASA YOSHIDA
1Department of Cell Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka University, Fukuoka, Japan;
2Central Research Institute for Advanced Molecular Medicine, Fukuoka University, Fukuoka, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
KENSUKE NISHI
3Section of Otolaryngology, Department of Medicine, Fukuoka Dental College, Fukuoka, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
SHUHEI ISHIKURA
1Department of Cell Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka University, Fukuoka, Japan;
2Central Research Institute for Advanced Molecular Medicine, Fukuoka University, Fukuoka, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
TAICHI MATSUMOTO
4Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Drug Informatics and Translational Research, Fukuoka University, Fukuoka, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
KAZUHIKO NAKABAYASHI
5Department of Maternal-Fetal Biology, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
RYO YAZAKI
6Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
TAKASHI OHSHIMA
6Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MASAHIKO SUENAGA
7Department of Chemistry, Graduate School of Science, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
SENJI SHIRASAWA
1Department of Cell Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka University, Fukuoka, Japan;
2Central Research Institute for Advanced Molecular Medicine, Fukuoka University, Fukuoka, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
TOSHIYUKI TSUNODA
1Department of Cell Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka University, Fukuoka, Japan;
2Central Research Institute for Advanced Molecular Medicine, Fukuoka University, Fukuoka, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: tsunoda@fukuoka-u.ac.jp
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background/Aim: Pyra–Metho–Carnil (PMC) has been identified as a novel candidate compound for treating numerous malignancies; however, its mechanism of action remains unknown. In this study, we conducted RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) analyses to elucidate the mechanism of PMC against human colorectal cancer cells harboring mutant KRAS (mtKRAS). Materials and Methods: RNA-seq analyses of the HKe3-wild-type KRAS and HKe3-mtKRAS spheroids treated with DMSO or PMC for 6 days were performed. Results: RNA-seq data suggested that PMC treatment suppresses the aerobic glycolysis pathway in HKe3-mtKRAS spheroids through the down-regulation of the HIF1 pathway. Indeed, treatment with PMC markedly suppresses the absorption of glucose by spheroids and the secretion of lactate from them. Conclusion: PMC suppresses growth of cancer spheroid through down-regulation of cancer-specific glucose metabolism.

Key Words:
  • Cancer spheroids
  • PMC
  • glycolysis
  • HIF1
  • GLUT1

KRAS is a key molecule in the aberrant proliferation and malignant progression of cancer cells (1, 2).

Activated KRAS or KRAS-related tumor-promoting pathways are important targets for cancer therapeutics. Inhibitors of KRAS with specific mutations such as G12C (sotorasib) have been developed; however, 10% of oncogenic KRAS mutations are attributable to the G12C mutation (3-5). In addition, the efficacy of direct KRAS inhibitors and inhibitors of downstream KRAS signals targeting BRAF and MEK is temporal because cells often acquire drug resistance (6-8). Remarkably, conventional cancer treatments exhibited considerable toxicity when administered as therapy (9). To overcome these problems, we developed two isogenic colorectal cancer-derived HKe3 cell lines, whose endogenous allele of mutant KRAS (mtKRAS) G13D was disrupted and re-expressed either wild-type KRAS (wtKRAS; normal cell model) or mtKRAS G13D (cancer cell model) (10, 11). Further, we conducted a screening process on these cells to find natural compounds that selectively and effectively eliminate cancer spheroids. We identified a compound, Pyra–Metho–Carnil (PMC), which exhibits a specific antitumor activity for HKe3-mtKRAS spheroids (12). Furthermore, PMC demonstrates growth-restricting properties against cancer spheroids with various genetic mutations, regardless of tissue type (12), suggesting that PMC can target common features of cancer spheroids. However, the exact mechanisms of how PMC exerts its effects remain uncertain. In this study, we used RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) analyses on cancer spheroids treated with PMC for 6 days and revealed the mechanisms underlying the PMC-induced tumor growth inhibition.

Materials and Methods

Compounds. PMC (IUPAC Name: 1-{3-[(3,5-dimethylpyrazol-1-yl)methyl]-4-methoxyphenyl}-2,3,4,9-tetrahydro-1H-pyrido[3,4-b]indole) was synthesized by Namiki Shoji Co., Ltd. (Tokyo, Japan) as described previously (12).

Cell culture. HKe3-wtKRAS and HKe3-mtKRAS cultures were established and maintained as previously described (10, 11).

3D floating cell culture. Cells were seeded in 96-well plates with round bottoms and ultralow attachment surfaces (product number 7007; Corning Inc., Corning, NY, USA) and treated with PMC on day 0 as described previously (10, 12).

RNA-seq. RNA-seq libraries were prepared using the NEBNext rRNA Depletion Kit (Human/Mouse/Rat) (E6310, NEB, Ipswich, MA, USA) and NEBNext Ultra Directional RNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina (E7420, NEB) per the manufacturer’s protocols, with 700 ng of total RNA as the starting material and eight polymerase chain reaction cycles for library amplification. The RNA-seq libraries were sequenced on a HiSeq X platform (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) in the paired-end mode (150 bp ×2) at the GENEWIZ NGS Laboratory (South Plainfield, NJ, USA). Sequence reads in the FASTQ format were aligned to the hg19 human reference genome using hisat2-2.1.0. To conduct an exon-wise expression analysis, we compiled a nonredundant list of 316,759 exons in a bed file format from the gencode.v27lift37.gtf file obtained from the GENCODE website (https://www.gencodegenes.org). Bam files generated by hisat2 were subjected to the coverage command of bedtools to count mapped read numbers for each of the 316,759 exons. The count data of eight samples were combined and normalized by the total read count numbers and used to search for exons showing different expression levels. Data were visualized using the Integrative Genomics Viewer (Broad Institute, Cambridge, MA, USA).

RNA-seq analysis. To identify genes that were upregulated in HKe3-mtKRAS spheroids and repressed by PMC treatment, the genes whose expression levels were 1.5 times higher in HKe3-mtKRAS spheroids compared to HKe3-wtKRAS spheroids and 0.66 times lower in PMC-treated HKe3-mtKRAS spheroids compared to dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO)-treated HKe3-mtKRAS spheroids (p<0.05) were selected. Furthermore, genes whose expression levels were significantly changed by PMC in the normal cell model (HKe3-wtKRAS spheroids) and whose fragments per kilobase of exon per million reads mapped values were <50 in HKe3-mtKRAS samples were excluded.

Glucose uptake. HKe3-wtKRAS spheroids (4×103 cell/well) and HKe3-mtKRAS spheroids (1×103 cell/well) were cultured using 10% FBS DMEM (high glucose) in 96-well ultralow attachment plate for 7 days. Spheroids were treated with PMC (30 μM) in 400 μl of no-glucose DMEM (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), without the FBS medium. Cells were incubated at 37°C with 5% CO2 (20% O2) for 1 h. The medium (200 μl) was removed without disturbing the cells. A 200-μl aliquot of 400-μM 2-NBDLG {2-[N-(7-Nitrobenz-2-oxa-1,3-diazol-4-yl)amino]-2-deoxy-L-glucose} (FUJIFILM Wako Pure Chemical Corporation, Osaka, Japan) resolved in DMEM without glucose was gently added to each well, and spheroids were incubated at 37°C with 5% CO2 for 1 h. Spheroids were washed using PBS and dispersed using accutase solution (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) for 10 min at 37°C. Flow cytometry was performed using FACSVerse™ (BD Biosciences, Fraklin Lakes, NJ, USA) and analyzed using FlowJo™ (BD Biosciences).

Lactate assay. We performed 3D floating culture using HKe3-wtKRAS or HKe3-mtKRAS cells. A 20-μl aliquot of the culture supernatant was used for the Lactate Assay Kit-WST (Dojindo, Kumamoto, Japan) per the manufacturer’s protocol.

Antibodies. Anti-HIF1α (D1S7W), anti-HIF1β (D28F3), anti-PDK1(#3062), anti-GLUT1(D3J3A), and anti-Hexokinase II (#2106) antibodies were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (Danvers, MA, USA). The anti-actin antibody was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA).

Western blotting. Cells were lysed in RIPA buffer (50-mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 150-mM NaCl, 1% NP40, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, and 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate) containing a protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) and subjected to immunoblotting as described previously (13).

Results

Expression analysis of molecules repressed by treatment with PMC in spheroid cultures. To gain a more comprehensive understanding of how PMC suppresses tumor growth, we conducted RNA-seq on RNA extracted from HKe3-mtKRAS spheroids and HKe3-wtKRAS spheroids, treated with either PMC or DMSO as a control for 6 days (Figure 1A). Using RNA-seq data, we identified 81 genes that may underlie PMC-induced growth inhibition (Table I). As their expression levels were specifically affected by PMC treatment, these genes potentially include molecules targeted by PMC in HKe3-mtKRAS spheroids.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Transcriptional down-regulation of genes involved in glycolysis and HIF1-mediated responses in HKe3-mtKRAS spheroids upon PMC treatment. (A) Experimental scheme of cell preparation for RNA-sequencing. HKe3-mtKRAS and HKe3-mtKRAS cells were seeded into 96-well plates with round bottoms and ultralow attachment surfaces, and treated with or without PMC (30 μM) for 6 days. Spheroids were collected from 96 wells and subjected to RNA-sequencing on day 6. Gene expression levels were analyzed using data from four independent experiments. (B) Gene ontology enrichment analysis using the Metascape software for genes whose expression is specifically down-regulated by PMC in HKe3-mtKRAS spheroids. (C) Summary of the enrichment analysis performed using Metascape for transcription factor targets of genes specifically down-regulated by PMC in HKe3-mtKRAS spheroids. Enriched terms are shown as bar graphs and color-coded by p-values. PMC, Pyra–Metho–Carnil.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table I.

Genes up-regulated in HKe3-mtKRAS spheroids and repressed by PMC treatment.

To identify the biological processes affected by PMC in cancer spheroids, we performed an ontology analysis on genes identified in our RNA-seq data. Ontology analysis revealed that biological processes such as glycolysis, HIF1 signaling, and protein hydroxylation were remarkably enriched among the genes that were down-regulated in PMC-treated HKe3-mtKRAS spheroids (Figure 1B). Furthermore, the in-silico analysis of transcription factor targets revealed an abundance of pathways controlled by HIF1 (Figure 1C). These data suggest that treatment of HKe3-mtKRAS spheroids with PMC reduces the transcriptional level of factors in the glycolysis pathways regulated by HIF1.

To further substantiate these results, we assessed the changes at the protein level of some HIF1-regulated genes by immunoblotting using spheroid cell lysates (Figure 2A). As expected, PMC reduced the expression of glycolysis-associated proteins (PDK1, GLUT1, and HK 2). Given that cancer cells consume high energy and prefer to use glycolysis for ATP production, these data suggest that PMC exerts its antitumor effects through the inhibition of cancer-specific glucose metabolism known as the Warburg effect in cancer spheroids. Interestingly, HIF1 protein levels were found decreased in PMC-treated spheroids on day 6 (Figure 2B). In HKe3-mtKRAS spheroids, mRNAs of glycolysis-related genes (PDK1, GLUT1, HK2, and LDHA) were decreased by PMC; however, the RNA-seq analysis did not reveal a decrease in the HIF1A and B mRNAs (Figure 2C), suggesting that PMC can degrade HIF1 proteins through mechanisms that are currently unknown.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

PMC suppresses the expression of the hypoxia adaptation marker, HIF1, and its downstream factors in HKe3-mtKRAS spheroids. (A, B) Immunoblotting analysis of PDK1, GLUT1, HK2, HIF1α, and HIF1β in HKe3-mtKRAS spheroids treated with DMSO (Control) or PMC (30 μM) for 6 days. Actin was used as the loading control. (C) Visual representation of RNA-seq results (screenshot of the Integrative Genomics Viewer) of HKe3-mtKRAS and HKe3-wtKRAS spheroids treated with DMSO or PMC (30 μM) for 6 days for genomic loci containing the HIF1α, HIF1β, PDK1, GLUT1, HK2, or LDHA genes. The MYC gene was used as an unaffected control. The bottom rows represent the exon-intron structures of the genes. Values in the Y-axes of the panels represent the ranges of mapped reads. PMC, Pyra–Metho–Carnil; DMSO, dimethyl sulfoxide; PDK1, pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase 1; GLUT1, glucose transporter 1; HK2, hexokinase 2; HIF1, hypoxia inducible factor 1; LDHA, lactate dehydrogenase A.

PMC suppresses glucose uptake and lactate production. GLUT1 is a representative glucose transporter involved in the uptake of glucose. We performed a glucose uptake assay in PMC-treated spheroids (Figure 3). Under control treatment with DMSO, glucose levels of HKe3-mtKRAS spheroids were higher than those of HKe3-wtKRAS spheroids. PMC treatment led to reduction of glucose levels of HKe3-mtKRAS spheroids to levels similar to those of HKe3-wtKRAS spheroids (~50% reduction compared to HKe3-mtKRAS spheroids treated with DMSO). Lactate levels were also decreased by PMC treatment in the culture supernatant of HKe3-mtKRAS spheroids (Figure 4). These data confirm that cellular glucose metabolism was actually suppressed by PMC treatment on day 6.

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

PMC suppresses glucose uptake in HKe3-mtKRAS spheroids. Fluorescence images (A) or flow cytometry analyses (B and C) of HKe3-wtKRAS or HKe3-mtKRAS spheroids treated with DMSO (Control) or PMC (30 μM) for 1 h on day 7, using 2-[N-(7-Nitrobenz-2-oxa-1,3-diazol-4-yl)amino]-2-deoxy-L-glucose (2-NBDLG) to visualize glucose uptake levels. (A) Representative images of spheroids are shown. Blue, nuclear DNA; green, 2-NBDLG. Scale bar, 100 μm. (B) Distribution of the 2-NBDLG signal intensity in cells dispersed from spheroids. (C) Median values of the 2-NBDLG signal normalized to the signal intensity of unstained control samples. The data represent the mean±SD of three independent experiments. PMC, Pyra–Metho–Carnil; DMSO, dimethyl sulfoxide.

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

PMC suppresses lactate production. Relative lactate levels of the culture supernatant of HKe3-wtKRAS or HKe3-mtKRAS spheroids treated with DMSO (control) or PMC (30 μM) for 3 or 6 days. The data represent the mean±SD of three independent experiments. *p<0.05: **p<0.01 (Student’s t-test). PMC, Pyra–Metho–Carnil; DMSO, dimethyl sulfoxide.

Discussion

Together, RNA-seq and immunoblotting analyses revealed that PMC treatment down-regulates the expression of a group of glycolysis-associated proteins (Table I; Figure 1 and Figure 2). Among the proteins down-regulated by PMC, GLUT1 promotes glucose uptake into the cell, HK2 phosphorylates glucose to produce glucose-6-phosphate in the first step of glycolysis, and PGK1 catalyzes the conversion of 1,3-diphosphoglycerate to 3-phosphoglycerate to generate ATP molecules (14-16). In contrast, PDK1 inactivates pyruvate dehydrogenase, thereby inhibiting the influx of glucose-derived acetyl-CoA into the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle, and LDHA promotes the production of lactate from pyruvate supplied by glycolysis (14-16) (Figure 5). These proteins are regulated by HIF1, as suggested by the ontology analysis (Figure 1), which plays a central role in the adaptation to hypoxic conditions (15, 17). Cancer cells also promote the production of lactate even in aerobic conditions. This aerobic glycolysis and TCA cycle inhibition in cancer cells are known as the Warburg effect (14, 18). While HIF1 signaling modulates the key processes required for the Warburg effect, aerobic glycolysis contributes to accumulation of HIF1 proteins in cancer cells, suggesting a complex association between HIF1 signaling and the Warburg effect (14, 15, 19).

Figure 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 5.

A model for the effect of PMC to suppress spheroid growth through the negative regulation of HIF1 signaling pathways. The cancer spheroid environment stimulates HIF1 signaling pathways to up-regulate the expression of glycolysis-associated proteins such as GLUT1, PDK1, HK2, PGK1, and LDHA. GLUT1 promotes glucose uptake into cells. PDK1 inhibits the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle in mitochondria. HK2, PGK1, and LDHA promote energy metabolism through anaerobic glycolysis and lactate production. These glycolysis-associated proteins contribute to tumor growth through aerobic glycolysis, a phenomenon known as the Warburg effect. PMC may inhibit cancer spheroid growth by suppressing cancer-specific and HIF1-regulated glucose metabolism. PMC, Pyra–Metho–Carnil; HIF1, hypoxia inducible factor 1; GLUT1, glucose transporter 1; PDK1, pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase 1; HK2, hexokinase 2; PGK1, phosphoglycerate kinase 1; LDHA, lactate dehydrogenase A.

Metabolic reprogramming is among the hallmarks of cancer, and the reprogramming of metabolic pathways in mutant KRAS cells contributes to active protein synthesis and cell proliferation (16, 20, 21). The regulation of glycolysis for energy production in cancer cells has become a focus of research in therapies that selectively target cancer cells (14). The findings of this study suggest that PMC exerts its anticancer effects through inhibition of HIF1-mediated pathways (Figure 5). We also hypothesized that the uptake of glucose into spheroid cells and cellular levels of lactate were reduced by PMC (Figure 3 and Figure 4), suggesting that PMC (and its derivatives) can pave the way for the development of anticancer therapies targeting the Warburg effect (which is a typical feature of tumors). In this study, RNA-seq of 3D spheroids of HKe3-wtKRAS and HKe3-mtKRAS cells treated with PMC was performed on day 6. Further analyses at earlier time points after the addition of PMC would reveal the precise mechanisms leading to down-regulation of HIF1.

Acknowledgements

The Authors thank Yuriko Isoyama and Yumiko Hirose for technical assistance. This work was supported by Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (KAKENHI, Grant Number 15K06847, 18K07215, 21K07161, and 22K07221) from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology (MEXT) of Japan and the Fukuoka Foundation for Sound Health Cancer Research Fund.

Footnotes

  • Authors’ Contributions

    K.Y., Kensuke N., T.M., and T.T. performed experiments, analyzed the data, and wrote the first manuscript draft. S.I., Kazuhiko N., R.Y., and M.S. participated in study design, data collection, and analysis. T.O. and S.S. conceived the idea, designed the study, interpreted the data, provided important intellectual content, and obtained final approval for manuscript submission.

  • Conflicts of Interest

    The Authors declare no conflicts of interest.

  • Received May 13, 2023.
  • Revision received June 12, 2023.
  • Accepted June 19, 2023.
  • Copyright © 2023 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.

This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 international license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0).

References

  1. ↵
    1. Jančík S,
    2. Drábek J,
    3. Radzioch D,
    4. Hajdúch M
    : Clinical relevance of KRAS in human cancers. J Biomed Biotechnol 2010: 1-13, 2010. DOI: 10.1155/2010/150960
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  2. ↵
    1. Punekar SR,
    2. Velcheti V,
    3. Neel BG,
    4. Wong KK
    : The current state of the art and future trends in RAS-targeted cancer therapies. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 19(10): 637-655, 2022. DOI: 10.1038/s41571-022-00671-9
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  3. ↵
    1. Canon J,
    2. Rex K,
    3. Saiki AY,
    4. Mohr C,
    5. Cooke K,
    6. Bagal D,
    7. Gaida K,
    8. Holt T,
    9. Knutson CG,
    10. Koppada N,
    11. Lanman BA,
    12. Werner J,
    13. Rapaport AS,
    14. San Miguel T,
    15. Ortiz R,
    16. Osgood T,
    17. Sun JR,
    18. Zhu X,
    19. McCarter JD,
    20. Volak LP,
    21. Houk BE,
    22. Fakih MG,
    23. O’Neil BH,
    24. Price TJ,
    25. Falchook GS,
    26. Desai J,
    27. Kuo J,
    28. Govindan R,
    29. Hong DS,
    30. Ouyang W,
    31. Henary H,
    32. Arvedson T,
    33. Cee VJ,
    34. Lipford JR
    : The clinical KRAS(G12C) inhibitor AMG 510 drives anti-tumour immunity. Nature 575(7781): 217-223, 2019. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-019-1694-1
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Kwan AK,
    2. Piazza GA,
    3. Keeton AB,
    4. Leite CA
    : The path to the clinic: a comprehensive review on direct KRASG12C inhibitors. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 41(1): 27, 2022. DOI: 10.1186/s13046-021-02225-w
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Moore AR,
    2. Rosenberg SC,
    3. McCormick F,
    4. Malek S
    : RAS-targeted therapies: is the undruggable drugged? Nat Rev Drug Discov 19(8): 533-552, 2020. DOI: 10.1038/s41573-020-0068-6
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Zhu C,
    2. Guan X,
    3. Zhang X,
    4. Luan X,
    5. Song Z,
    6. Cheng X,
    7. Zhang W,
    8. Qin JJ
    : Targeting KRAS mutant cancers: from druggable therapy to drug resistance. Mol Cancer 21(1): 159, 2022. DOI: 10.1186/s12943-022-01629-2
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Holohan C,
    2. Van Schaeybroeck S,
    3. Longley DB,
    4. Johnston PG
    : Cancer drug resistance: an evolving paradigm. Nat Rev Cancer 13(10): 714-726, 2013. DOI: 10.1038/nrc3599
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Jin H,
    2. Wang L,
    3. Bernards R
    : Rational combinations of targeted cancer therapies: background, advances and challenges. Nat Rev Cancer 22(3): 213-234, 2023. DOI: 10.1038/s41573-022-00615-z
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  7. ↵
    1. van den Boogaard WMC,
    2. Komninos DSJ,
    3. Vermeij WP
    : Chemotherapy side-effects: not all DNA damage is equal. Cancers 14(3): 627, 2022. DOI: 10.3390/cancers14030627
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Tsunoda T,
    2. Ishikura S,
    3. Doi K,
    4. Iwaihara Y,
    5. Hidesima H,
    6. Luo H,
    7. Hirose Y,
    8. Shirasawa S
    : Establishment of a three-dimensional floating cell culture system for screening drugs targeting kras-mediated signaling molecules. Anticancer Res 35(8): 4453-4459, 2015.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. Shirasawa S,
    2. Furuse M,
    3. Yokoyama N,
    4. Sasazuki T
    : Altered growth of human colon cancer cell lines disrupted at activated Ki-ras. Science 260(5104): 85-88, 1993. DOI: 10.1126/science.8465203
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. Yoshida K,
    2. Nishi K,
    3. Ishikura S,
    4. Nakabayashi K,
    5. Yazaki R,
    6. Ohshima T,
    7. Suenaga M,
    8. Shirasawa S,
    9. Tsunoda T
    : Cancer spheroid proliferation is suppressed by a novel low-toxicity compound, pyra-metho-carnil, in a context-independent manner. Anticancer Res 42(8): 3993-4001, 2022. DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.15895
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    1. Ishikura S,
    2. Yoshida K,
    3. Tsunoda T,
    4. Shirasawa S
    : Death domain–associated protein DAXX regulates noncoding RNA transcription at the centromere through the transcription regulator ZFAT. J Biol Chem 298(11): 102528, 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbc.2022.102528
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Hay N
    : Reprogramming glucose metabolism in cancer: can it be exploited for cancer therapy? Nat Rev Cancer 16(10): 635-649, 2016. DOI: 10.1038/nrc.2016.77
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Paredes F,
    2. Williams HC,
    3. San Martin A
    : Metabolic adaptation in hypoxia and cancer. Cancer Lett 502: 133-142, 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2020.12.020
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Zhang J,
    2. Zou S,
    3. Fang L
    : Metabolic reprogramming in colorectal cancer: regulatory networks and therapy. Cell Biosci 13(1): 25, 2023. DOI: 10.1186/s13578-023-00977-w
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Eales KL,
    2. Hollinshead KE,
    3. Tennant DA
    : Hypoxia and metabolic adaptation of cancer cells. Oncogenesis 5(1): e190-e190, 2016. DOI: 10.1038/oncsis.2015.50
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Hanahan D,
    2. Weinberg RA
    : Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell 144(5): 646-674, 2011. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Lu H,
    2. Forbes RA,
    3. Verma A
    : Hypoxia-inducible factor 1 activation by aerobic glycolysis implicates the Warburg effect in carcinogenesis. J Biol Chem 277(26): 23111-23115, 2002. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M202487200
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    1. Charitou T,
    2. Srihari S,
    3. Lynn MA,
    4. Jarboui MA,
    5. Fasterius E,
    6. Moldovan M,
    7. Shirasawa S,
    8. Tsunoda T,
    9. Ueffing M,
    10. Xie J,
    11. Xin J,
    12. Wang X,
    13. Proud CG,
    14. Boldt K,
    15. Al-Khalili Szigyarto C,
    16. Kolch W,
    17. Lynn D
    : Transcriptional and metabolic rewiring of colorectal cancer cells expressing the oncogenic KRASG13D mutation. Br J Cancer 121(1): 37-50, 2019. DOI: 10.1038/s41416-019-0477-7
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Kerk SA,
    2. Papagiannakopoulos T,
    3. Shah YM,
    4. Lyssiotis CA
    : Metabolic networks in mutant KRAS-driven tumours: tissue specificities and the microenvironment. Nat Rev Cancer 21(8): 510-525, 2021. DOI: 10.1038/s41568-021-00375-9
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research: 43 (8)
Anticancer Research
Vol. 43, Issue 8
August 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Inhibitory Effect of Pyra–Metho–Carnil on Cancer Spheroid Growth Through Decrease in Glycolysis-associated Molecules
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 19 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Inhibitory Effect of Pyra–Metho–Carnil on Cancer Spheroid Growth Through Decrease in Glycolysis-associated Molecules
KAZUMASA YOSHIDA, KENSUKE NISHI, SHUHEI ISHIKURA, TAICHI MATSUMOTO, KAZUHIKO NAKABAYASHI, RYO YAZAKI, TAKASHI OHSHIMA, MASAHIKO SUENAGA, SENJI SHIRASAWA, TOSHIYUKI TSUNODA
Anticancer Research Aug 2023, 43 (8) 3717-3726; DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.16556

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Inhibitory Effect of Pyra–Metho–Carnil on Cancer Spheroid Growth Through Decrease in Glycolysis-associated Molecules
KAZUMASA YOSHIDA, KENSUKE NISHI, SHUHEI ISHIKURA, TAICHI MATSUMOTO, KAZUHIKO NAKABAYASHI, RYO YAZAKI, TAKASHI OHSHIMA, MASAHIKO SUENAGA, SENJI SHIRASAWA, TOSHIYUKI TSUNODA
Anticancer Research Aug 2023, 43 (8) 3717-3726; DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.16556
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Inhibitory Effect of Pyra-Metho-Carnil on the Differentiation and Maturation of Macrophages in Normal and Cancer Microenvironments
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Tissue Prognostic Markers for Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Tumor-stroma Interaction: Impact on TNM Staging Parameters
  • CA9-Positive Keloid Fibroblasts: Modulator of Local Inflammation Induced by the Hypoxic and Glycolysis-enhanced Microenvironment
  • Predictive Factors for Multiple Metastases of Clear-cell Renal Cell Carcinoma
Show more Experimental Studies

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Cancer spheroids
  • PMC
  • glycolysis
  • HIF1
  • GLUT1
Anticancer Research

© 2025 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire