Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleClinical Studies

CDX2-positive Cancer of Unknown Primary With Upper-body Paralysis Was Dramatically Improved by Colorectal Cancer Chemotherapy

HIDEKO AKAGI, YUSAKU TANAKA, KOHEI WADA, MIANAMI TAKAHASHI, KOUDAI YOSHIDA and HIDEHARU DOMOTO
Anticancer Research June 2023, 43 (6) 2879-2884; DOI: https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.16458
HIDEKO AKAGI
1Department of Oncology, Keiyu Hospital, Yokohama, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: h-akagi{at}keiyu-hosipital.com
YUSAKU TANAKA
2Department of Gastroenterology, Keiyu Hospital, Yokohama, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
KOHEI WADA
3Department of Rehabilitation, Keiyu Hospital, Yokohama, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MIANAMI TAKAHASHI
4Department of Palliative Care, Keiyu Hospital, Yokohama, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
KOUDAI YOSHIDA
5Department of Orthopedics, Keiyu Hospital, Yokohama, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
HIDEHARU DOMOTO
6Department of Pathology, Keiyu Hospital, Yokohama, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background: Caudal-related homeobox transcription factor 2 (CDX2) is expressed in intestinal epithelial cells. CDX2 is a very sensitive marker for the identification of small and large intestine tumors, which is expressed in 85.7-100% of colorectal cancer (CRC) cases. Case Report: A 61-year-old female had been suffering from left shoulder pain for one month. Computed tomography showed osteolytic masses extending to the vertebral arch in the C5, C6, C7, and Th3 vertebral bodies. In addition, a thickening of the sigmoid colon was observed from the rectal-sigmoid colon, suggesting CRC. A colon biopsy revealed poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma and the vertebra excision was metastatic adenocarcinoma. However, immunohistochemically, the vertebra tumor was negative for CK7 and CK20 but positive for CDX2. Therefore, we made the diagnosis of CRC with bone metastasis and decided to start treatment for CRC. Posterior stabilization was performed for the spinal tumor 6 days after admission. About one month after admission, she started treatment with chemotherapy. Initially, her left hand could not move, and she could barely hold the pen with her right hand. After adding cetuximab for the third time, she became able to bend the dorsiflexion of her right wrist joint, grasp a stick with her right hand, and move the fingertips of her left hand a little. Conclusion: The presented case could not be diagnosed as CRC unless CDX2 was examined. Upper body paralysis due to CRC bone metastasis was improved by chemotherapy.

Key Words:
  • Caudal-related homeobox transcription factor 2 (CDX2)
  • CRC
  • chemotherapy
  • metastatic spinal tumor
  • spinal cord compression
  • cetuximab
  • manual muscle testing

Cancers of unknown primary origin still have a poor prognosis. Caudal-related homeobox transcription factor 2 (CDX2) is expressed in intestinal epithelial cells and is essential for their development and differentiation (1, 2). CDX2 is expressed from the duodenum to the rectum and is a very sensitive marker for the identification of small and large intestine tumors. It is expressed in 85.7-100% of cases of colorectal cancer (CRC) (3). However, CDX2 expression is not a frequently measured marker in CRC.

Metastatic spinal tumors commonly metastasize to the cancellous bone of the vertebral body and often extend posteriorly (pedicles) to the vertebrae. In the case of spinal cord compression due to extra vertebral extension of the tumor, paralytic symptoms appear that aggravate acutely (4).

We herein describe the findings of a CRC case that was CDX2-positive, who dramatically responded to chemotherapy after posterior fixation. In addition, we also provide the latest available information on CDX2.

Case Report

A 61-year-old female had been suffering from left shoulder pain for one month. In the manual muscle test (MMT) when she first visited our hospital, the right deltoid muscle was 5/5, the left one was 2/5, the right biceps muscle was 5/5, the left one was 1/5, and the right triceps muscle was 5/5 and the left one was 2/5. Her finger extensions on both hands were 5/5. As for leg muscle strength, the tibialis anterior, quadriceps, and iliopsoas muscles were 5/5 on both sides. Therefore, marked muscle weakness of her left upper extremity was observed (Figure 1A and B). There were no major abnormalities in laboratory data. C-reactive protein (CRP) was 0.36 (mg/dl) and D dimer was 1.34 (μg/ml), both of which were slightly high. As tumor markers, carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) was 570 U/ml, and soluble interleukin-2 receptor (sIL-2R) was slightly higher 550 U/ml. MRI showed osteolytic masses extending to the vertebral arch in the C5, C6, C7, and Th3 vertebral bodies (Figure 2). In addition, a thickening of the sigmoid colon was observed from the rectal area, and the boundary with the surrounding fat was unclear in computed tomography (CT), suggesting CRC (Figure 3). Colonoscopy revealed a circumferential stricture in the sigmoid colon with normal mucosa, suggestive of stricture due to dissemination. A colon biopsy revealed poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma (Figure 4A) and the vertebra excision was metastatic adenocarcinoma. However, immunohistochemically, the vertebra tumor was negative for CK7 and CK20 but positive for CDX2 (Figure 4B). Therefore, we made the diagnosis of CRC with bone metastasis. It took about 3 weeks to determine the diagnosis. There were no KRAS or BRAF mutations in the tissue.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Manual muscle test (MMT) of the right and left upper extremities. A) At the initial visit to our hospital, the MMT scores of the deltoid, biceps, and triceps muscles of the right upper extremity were all 5/5. Despite posterior stabilization, muscle weakness in the right upper limb progressed, and the right extremities could hardly move. However, chemotherapy dramatically improved the patient’s muscle weakness. With the continuation of chemotherapy, the movement of the upper right limb gradually improved. The squares represent biceps, the triangles represent triceps, and the arrows represent deltoid. B) At the initial visit to our hospital, the MMT scores of the left deltoid and triceps muscles of the left upper extremity was 2/5, while the score of the left biceps muscle was 1/5. The left upper extremity was originally recognized to have lost muscle strength earlier, and the muscle strength of the left upper extremity took longer to improve in comparison to the muscle strength of the right upper extremity. Nevertheless, chemotherapy gradually improved the movement of his left extremity. The squares represent biceps, the triangles represent triceps, and the arrows represent deltoid.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Osteolytic masses extended to the vertebral arch in the C5, C6, C7, and Th3 vertebral bodies (arrow).

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

Thickening of the sigmoid colon was observed from the rectal area, and the boundary with the surrounding fat was unclear on computed tomography, suggesting colorectal cancer (arrow).

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

Pathology of colorectal cancer and vertebra. A) Pathology of colorectal cancer. 1. Atypical cells grew in alveolar foci. Glandular formation was unclear, suggesting poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma (HE staining, ×200). 2. Cytokeratin 7 (CK7) negative (CK7 staining). 3. Cytokeratin 20 (CK20) negative (CK20 staining). Most colorectal cancers are CK7-negative and CK20-positive; thus, this case was not typical. B) Pathology of vertebra. 1. The tumor proliferated like an alveolus with some small glandular formations, suggesting moderately to poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma (HE staining, ×200). It was suspected that it was a metastatic lesion, but at this point it was not known where the metastasis came from. 2. CK7 negative (CK7 staining, ×200). 3. CK20 negative (CK20 staining, ×200). Negative results for CK7 and CK20 were consistent with colorectal cancer findings. 4. CDX2 positive. Diffuse nuclear positivity (CK20 staining, ×200). A positive CDX2 resulted in a diagnosis of colorectal cancer.

The muscle strength of the left upper extremity was weakened at the time of the first visit, but it became immobile after hospitalization. Not only the left upper extremity, but also the muscle strength and movement of the right upper extremity gradually deteriorated. Therefore, posterior stabilization was performed 6 days after admission. This approach significantly reduced pain in both shoulders, especially in her left shoulder, but the numbness remained severe. Three weeks after admission, the deltoid, biceps, and triceps MMT score on the right changed from 5/5 to 1/5 (Figure 1A and B). Around the same time, she was diagnosed with CRC, and we decided to start treatment with chemotherapy for CRC.

We told her that chemotherapy might not work, but she still wanted to do something rather than do nothing, thus we started mFOLFOX6 colorectal chemotherapy about one month after admission. Each cycle of mFOLFOX6 consisted of racemic leucovorin 200 mg/m2, oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 in a 2-hour infusion, bolus fluorouracil 400 mg/m2 on day 1, and a 46-hour infusion of fluorouracil 2,400 mg/m2 every two weeks. She was subjected to rehabilitation of her upper and lower limbs every day. Initially, at the start of chemotherapy she could not move her left hand and her right hand could hardly hold a pen. After adding cetuximab for the third time of mFOLFOX6, the muscle contraction improved slightly from the elbow of the right upper limb to the periphery of the fingers. She gradually improved. Three days after administration of cetuximab (every 2 weeks at 500 mg/m2), she became able to bend the dorsiflexion of her right wrist joint, grasp a stick with her right hand, and move the fingertips of her left hand a little. Only one and a half months after the start of chemotherapy, she was able to press the nurse call, operate her cell phone and write letters with her right hand. Almost at the same time her left hand also became mobile, and finally she was able to do the pronation and supination movements of her left hand. Numbness was still present but was managed with pregabalin and amitriptyline hydrochloride.

As she was improving, she worked even harder on rehabilitation. In order to leave the hospital, she practiced putting on her jacket while using her right hand well since she could not use her left hand. When she ate, she used a fork or spoon that was as light as possible and tried to bring it to her mouth. It wasn’t an easy rehabilitation, but she didn’t complain and did her best.

She finally returned home after three months in the hospital. At discharge, her biceps and triceps MMT scores improved from 1 to 3 on the right hand and from 0 to 2 on the left hand. In preparation for her discharge from the hospital, we also enhanced her personal support. After discharge, she was scheduled to come to the hospital once every two weeks for chemotherapy. While at home, her aunt helped her with her needs and the visiting nurse helped her bathe. Based on the situation at home after discharge, we consulted with the rehabilitation physical therapists of the hospital in order to improve her overall ability to move.

Her hands and numbness symptoms did not change significantly, but CT showed primary tumor’s getting bigger and worsening peritoneal dissemination, forcing her to change her chemotherapy regimen. Especially, after starting Cetuximab, her hands’ symptoms improved dramatically, so we continued as long as possible. When the effect of mFOLFOX6 disappeared, we switched to FOLFIRI (racemic leucovorin 200 mg/m2 in a 2-h infusion, CPT-11 150 mg/m2 in a one and a half-hour infusion, bolus fluorouracil 400 mg/m2 on day 1, and a 46-h infusion of fluorouracil 2,400 mg/m2 every two weeks) and changed cetuximab to ramucirumab (8 kg/m2, in one-hour infusion). Continuing chemotherapy sometimes made treatment impossible for more than 2 weeks, so the doses of oxaliplatin and CPT-11 were reduced by one step.

About seven months after the start of chemotherapy, there was no significant change in muscle strength, but numbness became stronger, and fever appeared. Considering a change in treatment, she became pale and had a drop in blood pressure. She noted peripheral coldness and cyanosis of her lips. No change in her consciousness was noted, but her respiratory status gradually worsened. About eight months after starting her chemotherapy, she passed away. At her family’s request, no autopsy was performed.

Discussion

CDX2 is a homeobox gene that encodes a transcription factor that is a major regulator of intestinal development and differentiation (1, 2). It has also been hypothesized that CDX2 has a tumor suppressor role in the adult colon (5, 6). Currently, CDX2 is used as an immunohistochemical marker of the intestinal epithelium, especially when classifying cancers of an unknown origin (7). In this case, it would not have been possible to identify a metastatic spine tumor from CRC without examining CDX2. More recently, CDX2 was identified as an emerging prognostic biomarker in CRC where CDX2 loss was found to be an independent risk factor for reduced overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) (8-10). CDX2 is absent in around 10% of CRC cancers (10), and CDX2-negative tumors are often associated with several adverse prognostic features, such as advanced stage, vascular invasion, poor differentiation, right-sided location, and BRAF mutation (8, 11). Loss of CDX2 expression in CRC is associated with lower OS and DFS, independently of ethnicity or stage (8-10). Tomasello et al. found that CDX2 expression was associated with 50% lower risk of death compared to poor or no CDX2 expression. This finding is more unassailable in stage II and III CRC, with up to 70% risk reduction in OS. CDX2 expression was also associated with a 52% lower risk of disease recurrence (9). Furthermore, Bruun et al. demonstrated that CDX2 was prognostic only in stage IV and III BRAF-mutated CRC patients, and not in stage I, II, and III BRAF wild-type CRC patients (12). Applying these results to this case, even if both upper limbs were paralyzed by a metastatic spinal tumor, it is convincing that symptoms could be improved by performing chemotherapy for CRC.

Furthermore, metastasis of CRC to the spine is very rare. Previous studies on metastatic CRC patients have shown that the incidence of metastatic bone disease was 6.9-10.4% (13-17). The treated lesions were predominantly located in the spine among bone metastases of CRC. Furthermore, CRC metastases to the spine presented with pain or signs of spinal cord compression (18). The reason is that the cancer cells grow and destroy the spine, causing pain and compressing the spinal cord, which leads to sensory impairment and motor paralysis. Radiation and surgical treatment are both effective and recommended for metastatic spinal cord lesions that compress the spinal cord. There appears to be a favorable trend for improved neurological outcome with surgical excision and stabilization as part of the management (19). In this case as well, when bone destruction occurs due to bone metastases, the spine becomes unstable. Spinal stabilization was performed, and the strong pain in her shoulders was greatly improved. Of course, even if there is a metastatic spinal tumor, the primary disease should be treated. Katagiri et al. performed radiotherapy and chemotherapy without surgery for metastatic spinal tumors and reported their efficacy (20). Of the 101 patients, 61.39% received radiation and chemotherapy, and 18.81% received chemotherapy alone. Pain relief was achieved in 67%, and 64% showed functional improvement. However, primary lesion responsiveness to nonsurgical therapy influenced the survival, neurological recovery, pain control, and function. In other words, nonsurgical treatment was successful only when primary tumors responded to radiation and/or chemotherapy. In this case, chemotherapy has improved the muscle weakness due to paralysis. Actually, if the disease progresses to the point where spinal metastasis occurs, it is almost impossible to cure her whole disease successfully. Eventually paralysis recurs.

Conclusion

In this case, paralysis of the upper extremities progressed rapidly due to a metastatic spinal tumor derived from CRC, as indicated by the CDX2 positivity. The fact that chemotherapy for CRC improved not only the current disease but also muscle weakness in the upper extremities is very rare.

Footnotes

  • Authors’ Contributions

    Conception and design: Hideko Akagi. Analysis and interpretation: Hideko Akagi, Yusaku Tanaka, Kohei Wada, Minami Takahashi, Kodai Yoshida, Hideharu Domoto. Data collection: Hideko Akagi, Yusaku Tanaka, Kohei Wada, Minami Takahashi, Kodai Yoshida, Hideharu Domoto. Writing the article: Hideko Akagi. Critical revision of the article: Hideko Akagi, Hideharu Domoto. Final approval of the article: Hideko Akagi. Overall responsibility: Hideko Akagi.

  • Conflicts of Interest

    The Authors have no conflicts of interest to declare regarding this study.

  • Received March 29, 2023.
  • Revision received April 9, 2023.
  • Accepted April 13, 2023.
  • Copyright © 2023 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Silberg DG,
    2. Sullivan J,
    3. Kang E,
    4. Swain GP,
    5. Moffett J,
    6. Sund NJ,
    7. Sackett SD and
    8. Kaestner KH
    : Cdx2 ectopic expression induces gastric intestinal metaplasia in transgenic mice. Gastroenterology 122(3): 689-696, 2002. PMID: 11875002. DOI: 10.1053/gast.2002.31902
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Beck F,
    2. Chawengsaksophak K,
    3. Waring P,
    4. Playford RJ and
    5. Furness JB
    : Reprogramming of intestinal differentiation and intercalary regeneration in Cdx2 mutant mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96(13): 7318-7323, 1999. PMID: 10377412. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.96.13.7318
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Moskaluk CA,
    2. Zhang H,
    3. Powell SM,
    4. Cerilli LA,
    5. Hampton GM and
    6. Frierson HF Jr.
    : Cdx2 protein expression in normal and malignant human tissues: an immunohistochemical survey using tissue microarrays. Mod Pathol 16(9): 913-919, 2003. PMID: 13679455. DOI: 10.1097/01.MP.0000086073.92773.55
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Tokuhashi Y,
    2. Uei H,
    3. Oshima M and
    4. Ajiro Y
    : Scoring system for prediction of metastatic spine tumor prognosis. World J Orthop 5(3): 262-271, 2014. PMID: 25035829. DOI: 10.5312/wjo.v5.i3.262
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Bonhomme C,
    2. Duluc I,
    3. Martin E,
    4. Chawengsaksophak K,
    5. Chenard MP,
    6. Kedinger M,
    7. Beck F,
    8. Freund JN and
    9. Domon-Dell C
    : The Cdx2 homeobox gene has a tumour suppressor function in the distal colon in addition to a homeotic role during gut development. Gut 52(10): 1465-1471, 2003. PMID: 12970140. DOI: 10.1136/gut.52.10.1465
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    1. Hryniuk A,
    2. Grainger S,
    3. Savory JG and
    4. Lohnes D
    : Cdx1 and Cdx2 function as tumor suppressors. J Biol Chem 289(48): 33343-33354, 2014. PMID: 25320087. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M114.583823
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    1. Werling RW,
    2. Yaziji H,
    3. Bacchi CE and
    4. Gown AM
    : CDX2, a highly sensitive and specific marker of adenocarcinomas of intestinal origin: an immunohistochemical survey of 476 primary and metastatic carcinomas. Am J Surg Pathol 27(3): 303-310, 2003. PMID: 12604886. DOI: 10.1097/00000478-200303000-00003
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Dalerba P,
    2. Sahoo D,
    3. Paik S,
    4. Guo X,
    5. Yothers G,
    6. Song N,
    7. Wilcox-Fogel N,
    8. Forgó E,
    9. Rajendran PS,
    10. Miranda SP,
    11. Hisamori S,
    12. Hutchison J,
    13. Kalisky T,
    14. Qian D,
    15. Wolmark N,
    16. Fisher GA,
    17. van de Rijn M and
    18. Clarke MF
    : CDX2 as a prognostic biomarker in stage II and stage III colon cancer. N Engl J Med 374(3): 211-222, 2016. PMID: 26789870. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1506597
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Tomasello G,
    2. Barni S,
    3. Turati L,
    4. Ghidini M,
    5. Pezzica E,
    6. Passalacqua R and
    7. Petrelli F
    : Association of CDX2 expression with survival in early colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Colorectal Cancer 17(2): 97-103, 2018. PMID: 29519711. DOI: 10.1016/j.clcc.2018.02.001
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Hansen TF,
    2. Kjær-Frifeldt S,
    3. Eriksen AC,
    4. Lindebjerg J,
    5. Jensen LH,
    6. Sørensen FB and
    7. Jakobsen A
    : Prognostic impact of CDX2 in stage II colon cancer: results from two nationwide cohorts. Br J Cancer 119(11): 1367-1373, 2018. PMID: 30425348. DOI: 10.1038/s41416-018-0285-5
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Baba Y,
    2. Nosho K,
    3. Shima K,
    4. Freed E,
    5. Irahara N,
    6. Philips J,
    7. Meyerhardt JA,
    8. Hornick JL,
    9. Shivdasani RA,
    10. Fuchs CS and
    11. Ogino S
    : Relationship of CDX2 loss with molecular features and prognosis in colorectal cancer. Clin Cancer Res 15(14): 4665-4673, 2009. PMID: 19584150. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-0401
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    1. Bruun J,
    2. Sveen A,
    3. Barros R,
    4. Eide PW,
    5. Eilertsen I,
    6. Kolberg M,
    7. Pellinen T,
    8. David L,
    9. Svindland A,
    10. Kallioniemi O,
    11. Guren MG,
    12. Nesbakken A,
    13. Almeida R and
    14. Lothe RA
    : Prognostic, predictive, and pharmacogenomic assessments of CDX2 refine stratification of colorectal cancer. Mol Oncol 12(9): 1639-1655, 2018. PMID: 29900672. DOI: 10.1002/1878-0261.12347
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Riihimäki M,
    2. Hemminki A,
    3. Sundquist J and
    4. Hemminki K
    : Patterns of metastasis in colon and rectal cancer. Sci Rep 6: 29765, 2016. PMID: 27416752. DOI: 10.1038/srep29765
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Santini D,
    2. Tampellini M,
    3. Vincenzi B,
    4. Ibrahim T,
    5. Ortega C,
    6. Virzi V,
    7. Silvestris N,
    8. Berardi R,
    9. Masini C,
    10. Calipari N,
    11. Ottaviani D,
    12. Catalano V,
    13. Badalamenti G,
    14. Giannicola R,
    15. Fabbri F,
    16. Venditti O,
    17. Fratto ME,
    18. Mazzara C,
    19. Latiano TP,
    20. Bertolini F,
    21. Petrelli F,
    22. Ottone A,
    23. Caroti C,
    24. Salvatore L,
    25. Falcone A,
    26. Giordani P,
    27. Addeo R,
    28. Aglietta M,
    29. Cascinu S,
    30. Barni S,
    31. Maiello E and
    32. Tonini G
    : Natural history of bone metastasis in colorectal cancer: final results of a large Italian bone metastases study. Ann Oncol 23(8): 2072-2077, 2012. PMID: 22219016. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdr572
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Patanaphan V and
    2. Salazar OM
    : Colorectal cancer: metastatic patterns and prognosis. South Med J 86(1): 38-41, 1993. PMID: 8420014.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Besbeas S and
    2. Stearns MW Jr.
    : Osseous metastases from carcinomas of the colon and rectum. Dis Colon Rectum 21(4): 266-268, 1978. PMID: 657936. DOI: 10.1007/BF02586701
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Sundermeyer ML,
    2. Meropol NJ,
    3. Rogatko A,
    4. Wang H and
    5. Cohen SJ
    : Changing patterns of bone and brain metastases in patients with colorectal cancer. Clin Colorectal Cancer 5(2): 108-113, 2005. PMID: 16098251. DOI: 10.3816/ccc.2005.n.022
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Byttner M,
    2. Wedin R,
    3. Bauer H and
    4. Tsagozis P
    : Outcome of surgical treatment for bone metastases caused by colorectal cancer. J Gastrointest Oncol 12(5): 2150-2156, 2021. PMID: 34790381. DOI: 10.21037/jgo-21-108
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Kim JM,
    2. Losina E,
    3. Bono CM,
    4. Schoenfeld AJ,
    5. Collins JE,
    6. Katz JN and
    7. Harris MB
    : Clinical outcome of metastatic spinal cord compression treated with surgical excision ± radiation versus radiation therapy alone: a systematic review of literature. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 37(1): 78-84, 2012. PMID: 21629164. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318223b9b6
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Katagiri H,
    2. Takahashi M,
    3. Inagaki J,
    4. Kobayashi H,
    5. Sugiura H,
    6. Yamamura S and
    7. Iwata H
    : Clinical results of nonsurgical treatment for spinal metastases. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 42(5): 1127-1132, 1998. PMID: 9869239. DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(98)00288-0
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research: 43 (6)
Anticancer Research
Vol. 43, Issue 6
June 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
CDX2-positive Cancer of Unknown Primary With Upper-body Paralysis Was Dramatically Improved by Colorectal Cancer Chemotherapy
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
6 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
CDX2-positive Cancer of Unknown Primary With Upper-body Paralysis Was Dramatically Improved by Colorectal Cancer Chemotherapy
HIDEKO AKAGI, YUSAKU TANAKA, KOHEI WADA, MIANAMI TAKAHASHI, KOUDAI YOSHIDA, HIDEHARU DOMOTO
Anticancer Research Jun 2023, 43 (6) 2879-2884; DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.16458

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
CDX2-positive Cancer of Unknown Primary With Upper-body Paralysis Was Dramatically Improved by Colorectal Cancer Chemotherapy
HIDEKO AKAGI, YUSAKU TANAKA, KOHEI WADA, MIANAMI TAKAHASHI, KOUDAI YOSHIDA, HIDEHARU DOMOTO
Anticancer Research Jun 2023, 43 (6) 2879-2884; DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.16458
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Case Report
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Feasibility of Minimally Invasive Surgery for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Four-arm Comparative Study
  • Prior Radiotherapy Improves Progression-free Survival in Patients With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated With Tremelimumab–Durvalumab
  • Optimizing Biopsy Decisions in PI-RADS 3-4 Lesions: Integrating PSA-derived Biomarkers to Reduce Unnecessary Procedures
Show more Clinical Studies

Keywords

  • Caudal-related homeobox transcription factor 2 (CDX2)
  • CRC
  • chemotherapy
  • metastatic spinal tumor
  • spinal cord compression
  • cetuximab
  • manual muscle testing
Anticancer Research

© 2026 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire