Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleExperimental Studies

Development of anti-GD2 Antibody-producing Mesenchymal Stem Cells as Cellular Immunotherapy

MASAFUMI IGUCHI, SHIGEKI YAGYU, KOSUKE KAMBE, MAYUMI HIGASHI, SHIGEHISA FUMINO, TSUNAO KISHIDA, TOMOKO IEHARA, OSAM MAZDA and TATSURO TAJIRI
Anticancer Research June 2023, 43 (6) 2417-2424; DOI: https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.16409
MASAFUMI IGUCHI
1Department of Pediatric Surgery, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan;
2Department of Immunology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: micloud{at}koto.kpu-m.ac.jp
SHIGEKI YAGYU
3Department of Pediatrics, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
KOSUKE KAMBE
1Department of Pediatric Surgery, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan;
2Department of Immunology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MAYUMI HIGASHI
1Department of Pediatric Surgery, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
SHIGEHISA FUMINO
1Department of Pediatric Surgery, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
TSUNAO KISHIDA
2Department of Immunology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
TOMOKO IEHARA
3Department of Pediatrics, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
OSAM MAZDA
2Department of Immunology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
TATSURO TAJIRI
1Department of Pediatric Surgery, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan;
4Department of Pediatric Surgery, Kyushu University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Fukuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background/Aim: Using the tyrosine hydroxylase (TH)-MYCN mouse neuroblastoma (NB) model, we have previously reported the accumulation of mouse mesenchymal stem cells (mMSCs) on tumors in vivo and the antitumor effect of mMSCs transfected with a small molecule (IFN-β) expression gene. In this study, we have developed novel MSCs secreting anti-disialoganglioside GD2 antibody (anti-GD2-MSCs) and evaluated their antitumor effects in vitro. Materials and Methods: We generated an anti-GD2 antibody construct (14.G2a-Fcx2-GFP) incorporating FLAG-tagged single-chain fragment variable against GD2 fused to a linker sequence, a fragment of the constant portion of human IgG1, and GFP protein. The construct was lentivirally transduced into mMSCs and the transduction efficiency was assessed by GFP expression. The secretion of FLAG-tagged anti-GD2 antibody was detected by Western blotting using anti-FLAG antibody. Antibody binding capacity was confirmed by flow cytometry. Antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) was evaluated using human NB cells and human natural killer (NK) cells to assess whether the antitumor activity was enhanced in the presence of the produced antibodies. Results: The transduction efficiency of anti-GD2-MSCs was more than 90%. anti-GD2-MSCs secreted antibodies extracellularly and these antibodies had high affinity to GD2-expressing human NB cells. ADCC assays showed that the addition of antibodies secreted from anti-GD2-MSCs significantly increased the cytotoxic activity of NK cells against NB cells. Conclusion: Newly developed anti-GD2-MSCs produced functional antibodies that have affinity to the GD2 antigen on NB cells and can induce ADCC-mediated cytotoxicity. Anti-GD2-MSCs based cellular immunotherapy has the potential to be a novel therapeutic option for intractable NB.

Key Words:
  • Anti-GD2-antibody
  • drug delivery
  • immunotherapy
  • mesenchymal stem cell
  • neuroblastoma

Cancer immunotherapy using specific antibodies targeting tumor-associated antigens has attracted substantial attention in recent years because of its ability to selectively kill tumors, minimize the non-specific impact on patients by avoiding the immune recognition of normal tissues, and achieve complete and durable remission by using the immune system to eradicate dormant cancer cells or micrometastatic sites of cancer to prevent recurrence (1). In addition, a variety of strategies to boost the immune system have been developed in recent cancer immunotherapies, including immuno-nanotechnology, such as the specific delivery of multiple immunomodulators, enhanced uptake of immunotherapy by antigen-presenting cells (APCs) and new approaches to engineering T cells. These strategies are leading to new therapies that can ameliorate the current clinical problems (2-4).

GD2 is a disialoganglioside expressed on tumors of neuroectodermal origin including human neuroblastoma (NB) and other malignancies regardless of its malignant phenotype (5, 6). Therefore, GD2 is a suitable target for immunotherapy with monoclonal antibodies. Immunotherapy with an anti-GD2 monoclonal antibody, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor, interleukin-2 (IL-2), and isotretinoin has significantly improved survival in patients with high-risk NB (7). Although cancer immunotherapy possesses potent therapeutic efficacy, there are several problems in its clinical application due to the complex tumor microenvironment, patient heterogeneity, and systemic immunotoxicity (8, 9). Generally, cancer immunotherapy can enhance antitumor immunity against antigen-presenting tumor cells without serious side effects, but because GD2 is also expressed in normal tissues and cells including melanocytes and nerve fibers, anti-GD2 antibodies cause toxicities such as neuropathic pain, fever, and allergic reactions (1, 10). Consequently, the development of carrier-based drug delivery systems that specifically deliver antibodies to tumors is desirable in terms of reducing side effects and enhancing efficacy.

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have been identified as potential tumor-specific therapeutic delivery vehicles in NB due to their ability to homing to tumors (11, 12). MSCs are immunologically inert due to their low expression of constitutive major histocompatibility complex 1 (MHC1) and lack of MHC2 and costimulatory molecules CD80, CD86, and CD40 (13). Recent research suggests that therapeutic genes can be introduced into MSCs, which can migrate to micrometastatic sites of invasive tumors, allowing for more targeted treatment (14-17). Recombinant MSCs have also been shown to have antitumor effects on NBs (18, 19).

We previously reported that MSCs have a homing effect on tumors in the TH-MYCN mouse NB model (20, 21) and also found that mouse MSCs (mMSCs) transfected with the IFN-β gene inhibited tumor growth in the TH-MYCN mouse NB model (21). In this study, we manufactured MSC-based cellular vehicles armed to secrete anti-GD2 antibody, which were theoretically expected to facilitate specific delivery of the antibody to the tumor site and enhance anti-tumor activity with reducing systemic toxicity as a potential novel cellular immunotherapy for pediatric cancer.

Materials and Methods

Cells. Mouse MSCs (mMSCs) derived from the bone marrow of a C57BL/6 background mouse (Cyagen, Santa Clara, CA, USA) were maintained as described previously (20). The human NB cell lines IMR5 (high GD2 expression), SH-SY5Y (moderate GD2 expression), and SK-N-FI (low GD2 expression) were maintained in RPMI 1640 (Nacalai Tesque, Kyoto, Japan) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum with 1% penicillin/streptomycin (Nacalai Tesque). The cells were incubated at 37°C in 5% CO2 and 95% humidity. All NB cell lines were kindly provided by the laboratory at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia (PA, USA) and passaged in our department.

GD2 antibody construct design and lentiviral transduction. GD2-specific single-chain fragment variable (scFv14.G2a), which was previously identified and applied in clinical trials (22-24), was fused with human IgG1 hinge and two Fc regions (one of which was FLAG-tagged) by a Gly–Gly–Gly–Ser linker connection. The created construct of the cDNA of FLAG-tagged single-chain anti-GD2 antibody was named “14.G2a-Fcx2-FLAG”. 14.G2a-Fcx2-FLAG was cloned into the EcoRI/NheI-digested pCDH-EF1-MCS-T2A-copGFP, an HIV-based self-inactivating lentiviral vector plasmid (System Biosciences, Palo Alto, CA, USA). The lentiviral plasmid 14.G2a-Fcx2-GFP (Figure 1A) and the packaging plasmid were co-transfected into 293T cells and cultured. Viral supernatants were concentrated and transduced into mMSCs. Production and enrichment of viral supernatant and transduction into mMSCs were performed using the same procedures as previously reported (25). Anti-GD2-MSCs were photographed after transfection using a BZ-X710 microscope (Keyence, Osaka, Japan). The fluorescence intensity of transfected cells was observed using a FACSCalibur (Becton, Dickinson and Company, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Composition of the introduced anti-GD2 antibody constructs and evaluation of the reporter GFP expression of anti-GD2 mesenchymal stem cells. (A) Construction of the anti-GD2 antibody (14.G2a-Fcx2-GFP). (B) GFP expression in MSCs transduced with lentiviral constructs carrying anti-GD2 antibody and GFP was assessed by fluorescence microscopy (scale bar: 100μm). (C) GFP expression in anti-GD2-MSCs 7 days after transduction was analyzed by flow cytometry. (D) Anti-GD2-MSCs were cultured and analyzed by flow cytometry at different intervals after transduction to determine the percentage of GFP-positive cells. Data are presented as the mean±standard deviation of triplicate samples. Anti-GD2-MSCs, Anti-disialoganglioside GD2 antibody-secreting MSCs; LTR: long terminal repeat; EF1: elongation factor1; scFv, single-chain variable fragment.

Western blotting. MSCs and anti-GD2-MSCs were cultured at a density of 1×106 cells per 100-mm dish plate, and their supernatants were collected after 72 h. Each sample was treated with a Spin column-based Antibody Purification Kit (Protein G, Cosmo Bio, Tokyo, Japan). Proteins were detected from prepared samples (anti-GD2-MSCs-sup, MSCs-sup) and FLAG peptides (control) as previously reported using the following (25): polyvinylidene chloride membrane (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA), Blocking One (Nacalai Tesque), monoclonal ANTI-FLAG® M2 antibody (1:1000; MilliporeSigma, Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) and mouse IgG HRP-conjugated antibody (1:10,000; R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA). Immunoreactive bands were visualized using ImageQuant LAS500 (Cytiva, Tokyo, Japan).

Detection of GD2 expression in NB cell lines and the affinity assay for antibodies secreted by anti-GD2-MSCs. GD2 expression in human NB cell lines was detected using anti-GD2-PE, clone 14.G2a (cat no. 357304, BioLegend, San Diego, CA, USA). PE mouse IgG2a, Embedded Image isotype control (FC) antibody (cat no. 400213, BioLegend) was used as the isotype control. IMR-5, SH-SY5Y and SK-N-FI cells were incubated with MSCs-sup or anti-GD2-MSCs-sup for 30 min and then used for the affinity assay. The binding of FLAG-tagged human IgG1 derived anti-GD2 antibody onto the surface of NB cells treated with each supernatant was detected using APC anti-DYKDDDDK Tag antibody (cat no. 637307, BioLegend) and FITC anti-human IgG Fc antibody (cat no. 410719, BioLegend). Data were analyzed using the Cell Quest software (BD Bioscience).

Extraction of peripheral blood mononuclear cells and NK cells. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were isolated from the heparinized venous blood of healthy volunteers by density gradient centrifugation using Ficoll-Paque PLUS (Cytiva). Human NK cells were isolated from PBMCs using an NK isolation kit (Miltenyi Biotec, GmbH, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany). The procedure for the use of NK cells in this study was approved by the Ethical Committee of Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine (Permission number: ERB-C-2012).

Antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) assay. NK cell-mediated cytotoxicity was analyzed by flow cytometry using a PKH26 red fluorescent cell linker mini kit for general cell membrane labeling (Millipore Sigma, Merck KGaA) and a 7-aminoactinomycin D (7-AAD) cell viability staining (BD Biosciences, Becton, Dickinson, and Company). IMR-5, SH-SY5Y and SK-N-FI cells stained by PKH26 were plated at a density of 50,000 cells per well with NK cells in a 24-well plate and incubated with anti-GD2-MSCs-sup or MSCs-sup containing recombinant human IL-2 (R&D Systems) at a concentration of 100 IU/ml in each well. Assays were performed at NK cell:NB cell [effector:target (E:T)] ratios of 0:1 (untreated) to 10:1. After co-culture for 4 h, cells were harvested, 7-AAD was then added (0.25 μg/ml final concentration), and cells were analyzed by flow cytometry. The percentage of target cell death was corrected for spontaneous background death by subtracting the percentage of dead cells in control samples (PKH-26–labeled target alone) from the percentage of dead cells within test samples.

Statistical analyses. The experiments were performed in triplicate. Statistical significance was determined using Tukey’s multiple comparison test. Data were considered statistically significant at p<0.05. Data are expressed as the mean±standard deviation. All statistical analyses were performed using EZR (Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, Saitama, Japan).

Results

Evaluation of transfection efficiency by detecting GFP expression using fluorescence microscopy and flow cytometry. We initially introduced the transgene into MSCs using the CMV promoter, but transgene expression was minimal, probably due to transcriptional repression by gene silencing. Therefore, we chose the EF1a promoter (26). Almost all of the generated anti-GD2-MSCs expressed GFP, and the transfection efficiency exceeded 90% (Figure 1B-C). Expansion and passaging did not change the percentage of GFP-expressing cells (Figure 1D).

Anti-GD2 antibodies were secreted extracellularly by anti-GD2-MSCs. Antibodies secreted by anti-GD2-MSCs carried a marker peptide (FLAG) at the C-terminus. The presence of FLAG-tagged antibodies in the anti-GD2-MSC culture supernatant was confirmed by Western blotting of the samples extracted from anti-GD2-MSC or MSC culture supernatant and purified using an IgG column (Figure 2). The molecular weights indicated by the detected bands were also as expected (approximately 90 kDa). The MSC supernatant did not contain FLAG-tagged IgG.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Western analysis of FLAG protein (positive control), MSCs-supernatant (negative control), or Anti-GD2-MSCs-supernatant. The molecular weights of the FLAG-tagged anti-GD2 antibody and FLAG protein are approximately 90 and 64 kDa, respectively. Anti-GD2-MSCs, Anti-disialoganglioside GD2 antibody-secreting MSCs.

Antibodies secreted by anti-GD2-MSCs exhibited affinity for GD2 antigen on the surface of neuroblastoma cells. GD2 expression in three human NB cell lines is shown in Figure 3A. The fluorescently labeled anti-GD2 monoclonal antibody used for flow cytometry in Figure 3A has an antigen-binding site derived from 14.G2a, similar to our construct. These NB cell lines were used to check whether antibodies secreted by anti-GD2-MSCs have affinity for the GD2 antigen.

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

GD2 antigen expression in human neuroblastoma cell lines and the binding capacity of anti-GD2 antibody secreted by anti-GD2 mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). (A) The surface expression of GD2 on three neuroblastoma cell lines was evaluated by fluorescence-activated cell sorting. A GD2 isotype antibody was used as a negative control for detecting GD2 expression (light gray histograms). IMR-5, SH-SY5Y, and SK-N-FI and cells exhibited high, intermediate, and low GD2 expression, respectively (empty histograms). (B) Three neuroblastoma cell lines were suspended in the supernatant of anti-GD2-MSCs or MSCs and incubated at 4°C for 1 h. FLAG (left) and human IgG (right)-Fc portions of anti-GD2 antibody bound to the surface of neuroblastoma cells were detected by flow cytometry. Neuroblastoma cells incubated with non-transduced MSC supernatant are presented as light gray histograms, and neuroblastoma cells incubated with anti-GD2-MSC supernatant are presented as empty histograms. Anti-GD2-MSCs, Anti-disialoganglioside GD2 antibody-secreting MSCs.

Each NB cell line was suspended and incubated in anti-GD2-MSC or MSC supernatant, and the Fc region and FLAG tag on the surface of tumor cells were evaluated by flow cytometry. The Fc region and FLAG were identified on the surface of all three NB cell lines reacted with anti-GD2-MSC supernatant according to the intensity of GD2 expression (Figure 3). These data indicated that antibodies secreted by anti-GD2-MSCs could bind to human NB cells.

Antibodies secreted by anti-GD2-MSCs increased NK cell-induced cytotoxicity. Next, we tested whether the antibodies secreted by anti-GD2-MSCs caused ADCC, which is a major role of anti-GD2 antibody for neuroblastoma. There was no change in the relative viability of any NB cell line in the antibody-only group (anti-GD2-MSC culture supernatant without NK cells) compared to that in the control group (MSC culture supernatant without NK cells; Figure 4). Strikingly, the relative viability was significantly decreased in IMR5 (GD2-high) in the presence of antibodies (anti-GD2-MSC culture supernatant), compared to that in the absence of antibodies (MSC culture supernatant), when NK cells were present at E:T ratios of 1:1 (p=0.039) and 5:1 (p=0.005). At an E:T ratio of 10:1 (p=0.532), cytotoxicity tended to be higher in the presence of antibodies, although the difference was not significant (Figure 4A). The relative viability of SH-SY5Y (GD2-mid) cells was significantly lower in the presence of antibodies only for an E:T ratio of 5:1 (p=0.001). Cytotoxicity tended to be higher in the presence of antibodies at E:T ratios of 1:1 (p=0.608) and 10:1 (p=0.317), albeit without significance (Figure 4B). In SK-N-FI (GD2-low) cells, viability was not altered in the presence of antibodies for any E:T ratio (Figure 4C). These results indicate that anti-GD2-MSC culture supernatant containing anti-GD2 antibodies increases the cytotoxic effects of NK cells against NB cells. In addition, we conducted non-contact co-culture experiments with anti-GD2-MSCs and NB cells. After 72 hours of culturing IMR5 (GD2-high) cells in anti-GD2-MSC supernatant, MSC supernatant, and normal culture medium, the number of tumor cells cultured in anti-GD2-MSC supernatant was lower than the others. The results suggested that anti-GD2-MSCs had no effect on promoting NB cell growth in vitro (Supplementary Figure).

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

Antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) of anti-GD2 antibody secreted by anti-GD2 mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). Natural killer (NK) cell-mediated ADCC induced by anti-GD2 antibody from anti-GD2-MSCs was evaluated via co-culture with three neuroblastoma cell lines at different effector:target (E:T) ratios. Relative survival rate of each cell line. NK cells were cultured for 4 h with neuroblastoma cells in MSC supernatant (white) or anti-GD2-MSC supernatant (dark gray) with the interleukin-2 concentration adjusted to 100 IU/ml. Error bars indicate the standard errors of the means of three experiments. *p<0.05, as determined by Tukey’s t-test. anti-GD2-MSCs, Anti-disialoganglioside GD2 antibody-secreting MSCs.

Discussion

In this study, we demonstrated that anti-GD2-MSCs, which were genetically modified to produce anti-GD2 antibodies, exhibited anti-tumor efficacy via ADCC mediated by NK cells. Therefore, anti-GD2-MSCs could represent a promising therapeutic product that can enhance drug delivery to tumor sites and reduce unwanted systemic off-tumor toxicity, potentially caused by on-target cross-reactivity to these antibodies with normal tissues. However, the possibility that anti-GD2 antibodies counteracted the proliferation-promoting effect of MSCs cannot be dismissed because it has been suggested that anti-GD2 antibodies directly induce cell death in GD2-positive tumor cells without activating the immune mechanism (27, 28).

We previously demonstrated that mMSCs expressing IFN-β could migrate into the intra-abdominal tumors of TH-MYCN transgenic mice and exert an anti-tumor effect (21). However, the anti-tumor efficacy was transient, and tumor growth was not controlled. Because IFN-β is not a standard treatment for NB despite its ability to induce apoptosis, we chose anti-GD2 antibodies, which have already been applied clinically and which have validated efficacy against NB, as the therapeutic agent to be equipped for MSCs.

The current issues associated with clinical anti-GD2 antibody therapy are the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment and low tumor penetration of antibodies (29). However, the most challenging aspect of this therapy is the side effect of neuropathic pain (30), which is caused by maintaining the serum antibody levels, leading to dose limitation. In this respect, anti-GD2-MSCs are expected to reduce the side effects as well as the cost due to the ease of preparation. In this context, anti-GD2-MSCs accumulated in the tumor, as demonstrated by the in vitro assay, leading to the local secretion of the GD2 antibodies at the tumor site, which could induce NK cell-mediated ADCC in NB cells. Although we did not demonstrate the possibility that anti-GD2-MSCs invaded normal tissues including GD2-positive neurons, the homing ability of MSCs to tumor sites would circumvent off-tumor reactions in normal tissues, although this hypothesis should be definitely validated using in vivo syngeneic models. Nevertheless, this is the first study to prove that MSCs delivered to tumor sites can produce therapeutic antibodies and cause ADCC.

Importantly, anti-GD2-MSCs caused NK cell-mediated ADCC, which is the main mode of action of anti-GD2 antibodies rather than direct anti-tumor activity of the antibodies. As expected, ADCC was not induced in SK-N-FI cells, suggesting that cells with low GD2 expression including normal tissue would not be affected by anti-GD2-MSC–induced cytotoxicity.

The concept of anti-GD2-MSCs as a cellular therapy is promising, and these cells indeed exhibited tumor control. However, there remain limitations in applying this approach in the clinic. Although the homing of MSCs to tumors has been extensively investigated, the anti-tumor ability of anti-GD2-MSCs to avoid indiscriminate interactions with normal tissues should be validated using in vivo models. In addition, this experiment was validated in the presence of sufficient amounts of anti-GD2-MSCs to maintain antibody concentrations sufficient to cause ADCC. Further experiments are needed to determine whether sufficient local antibody concentrations can be maintained in vivo. Furthermore, it is possible that untransfected, non-armed MSCs would enhance tumor growth, as reported in several studies. Recent studies have shown that MSCs interact with and influence tumor cells at various stages of disease progression. MSCs increase the metastatic potential of tumor cells by promoting their motility and invasiveness as well as play a role in the formation of a metastatic niche at the secondary site (31-33); however, anti-tumor effects were observed in other studies, demonstrating their ability to inhibit the growth and metastasis of various malignancies (34-40). Because the tumor-promoting properties of MSCs may be partly related to their immunomodulatory effects (41), MSCs can impair the proliferation of T cells at the tumor site, the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines by dendritic cells and macrophages, B cell proliferation and immunoglobulin production, and the cytotoxic activity of NK cells (42). Nevertheless, we demonstrated the ability of anti-GD2-MSCs to induce NK cell-mediated ADCC without impairing NK cell function, which should be validated further using in vivo syngeneic models. As a next step of the present study, we are currently validating the efficacy and safety profiles of this treatment for in vivo mouse models using a modified anti-GD2 antibody with a fragment of a stationary portion changed from human IgG to mouse IgG and GFP. The preliminary data for syngeneic localized NB mouse model has just been published (25), and further experiments including an osteosarcoma model are now under planning.

Conclusion

In conclusion, we developed anti-GD2-MSCs as a potential novel cellular immunotherapy for NB. In this study, we generated a construct that is easy to evaluate for transduction efficiency and antibody secretion after gene transfer and introduced it into MSCs. The efficiency of the transfection was more than 90%, and anti-GD2-MSCs secreted FLAG-tagged anti-GD2 antibodies extracellularly as designed. Similar to general anti-GD2 monoclonal antibodies, antibodies secreted from anti-GD2-MSCs had affinity for GD2 antigen and ADCC activity via NK cells. Because anti-GD2-MSCs have the potential to specifically kill tumor cells without affecting normal cells with weak GD2 expression, anti-GD2-MSC–based cellular immunotherapy represents a novel therapeutic option for intractable NB.

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the members of the Department of Immunology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine for useful comments. The procedure for the use of NK cells in this study was approved by the Ethical Committee of Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine (Permission number: ERB-C-2012). This work was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Exploratory Research from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan (MEXT KAKENHI grant number 19H03719) and by the Practical Research for Innovative Cancer Control from the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development, AMED (grant number 20ck0106609h0001). The authors would like to thank Enago (www.enago.jp) for the English language review.

Footnotes

  • Authors’ Contributions

    Conceptualization: MI, SY, TT. Investigation: MI, KK, MH, SF. Validation: MI, SY, MH, TK. Supervision: SY, SF, TI, OM, TT. Writing – original draft: MI. Writing – review and editing: MI, SY, KK, MH, SF, TK, TI, OM, TT. Resources: SY, SF, TI, TT. Funding acquisition: SF, TT. All Authors contributed to manuscript revision, read, and approved the submitted version.

  • Supplementary Material

    Supplementary data in this paper are available as open data through the online data repository of the Department of Pediatric Surgery, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine at:<http://pedsurg.kpu-m.ac.jp/system/upload/pdf/Supplemental%20Figure.pdf>

  • Conflicts of Interest

    The Authors have no conflicts of interest directly relevant to the content of this article.

  • Received March 23, 2023.
  • Revision received April 15, 2023.
  • Accepted April 19, 2023.
  • Copyright © 2023 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Voeller J and
    2. Sondel PM
    : Advances in anti-GD2 immunotherapy for treatment of high-risk neuroblastoma. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 41(3): 163-169, 2019. PMID: 30897608. DOI: 10.1097/MPH.0000000000001369
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Zhang P,
    2. Chiu YC,
    3. Tostanoski LH and
    4. Jewell CM
    : Polyelectrolyte multilayers assembled entirely from immune signals on gold nanoparticle templates promote antigen-specific T cell response. ACS Nano 9(6): 6465-6477, 2015. PMID: 26035231. DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.5b02153
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Zeng B,
    2. Middelberg AP,
    3. Gemiarto A,
    4. MacDonald K,
    5. Baxter AG,
    6. Talekar M,
    7. Moi D,
    8. Tullett KM,
    9. Caminschi I,
    10. Lahoud MH,
    11. Mazzieri R,
    12. Dolcetti R and
    13. Thomas R
    : Self-adjuvanting nanoemulsion targeting dendritic cell receptor Clec9A enables antigen-specific immunotherapy. J Clin Invest 128(5): 1971-1984, 2018. PMID: 29485973. DOI: 10.1172/JCI96791
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Chahal JS,
    2. Khan OF,
    3. Cooper CL,
    4. McPartlan JS,
    5. Tsosie JK,
    6. Tilley LD,
    7. Sidik SM,
    8. Lourido S,
    9. Langer R,
    10. Bavari S,
    11. Ploegh HL and
    12. Anderson DG
    : Dendrimer-RNA nanoparticles generate protective immunity against lethal Ebola, H1N1 influenza, and Toxoplasma gondii challenges with a single dose. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 113(29): E4133-E4142, 2016. PMID: 27382155. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1600299113
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Mujoo K,
    2. Cheresh DA,
    3. Yang HM and
    4. Reisfeld RA
    : Disialoganglioside GD2 on human neuroblastoma cells: target antigen for monoclonal antibody-mediated cytolysis and suppression of tumor growth. Cancer Res 47(4): 1098-1104, 1987. PMID: 3100030.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. Sariola H,
    2. Terävä H,
    3. Rapola J and
    4. Saarinen UM
    : Cell-surface ganglioside GD2 in the immunohistochemical detection and differential diagnosis of neuroblastoma. Am J Clin Pathol 96(2): 248-252, 1991. PMID: 1713742. DOI: 10.1093/ajcp/96.2.248
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Yu AL,
    2. Gilman AL,
    3. Ozkaynak MF,
    4. London WB,
    5. Kreissman SG,
    6. Chen HX,
    7. Smith M,
    8. Anderson B,
    9. Villablanca JG,
    10. Matthay KK,
    11. Shimada H,
    12. Grupp SA,
    13. Seeger R,
    14. Reynolds CP,
    15. Buxton A,
    16. Reisfeld RA,
    17. Gillies SD,
    18. Cohn SL,
    19. Maris JM,
    20. Sondel PM and Children’s Oncology Group
    : Anti-GD2 antibody with GM-CSF, interleukin-2, and isotretinoin for neuroblastoma. N Engl J Med 363(14): 1324-1334, 2010. PMID: 20879881. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa0911123
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Binnewies M,
    2. Roberts EW,
    3. Kersten K,
    4. Chan V,
    5. Fearon DF,
    6. Merad M,
    7. Coussens LM,
    8. Gabrilovich DI,
    9. Ostrand-Rosenberg S,
    10. Hedrick CC,
    11. Vonderheide RH,
    12. Pittet MJ,
    13. Jain RK,
    14. Zou W,
    15. Howcroft TK,
    16. Woodhouse EC,
    17. Weinberg RA and
    18. Krummel MF
    : Understanding the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) for effective therapy. Nat Med 24(5): 541-550, 2018. PMID: 29686425. DOI: 10.1038/s41591-018-0014-x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Tuccitto A,
    2. Shahaj E,
    3. Vergani E,
    4. Ferro S,
    5. Huber V,
    6. Rodolfo M,
    7. Castelli C,
    8. Rivoltini L and
    9. Vallacchi V
    : Immunosuppressive circuits in tumor microenvironment and their influence on cancer treatment efficacy. Virchows Arch 474(4): 407-420, 2019. PMID: 30374798. DOI: 10.1007/s00428-018-2477-z
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Park JA and
    2. Cheung NV
    : Targets and antibody formats for immunotherapy of neuroblastoma. J Clin Oncol 38(16): 1836-1848, 2020. PMID: 32167865. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.19.01410
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Spaeth E,
    2. Klopp A,
    3. Dembinski J,
    4. Andreeff M and
    5. Marini F
    : Inflammation and tumor microenvironments: defining the migratory itinerary of mesenchymal stem cells. Gene Ther 15(10): 730-738, 2008. PMID: 18401438. DOI: 10.1038/gt.2008.39
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Chamberlain G,
    2. Fox J,
    3. Ashton B and
    4. Middleton J
    : Concise review: mesenchymal stem cells: their phenotype, differentiation capacity, immunological features, and potential for homing. Stem Cells 25(11): 2739-2749, 2007. PMID: 17656645. DOI: 10.1634/stemcells.2007-0197
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Devine SM,
    2. Cobbs C,
    3. Jennings M,
    4. Bartholomew A and
    5. Hoffman R
    : Mesenchymal stem cells distribute to a wide range of tissues following systemic infusion into nonhuman primates. Blood 101(8): 2999-3001, 2003. PMID: 12480709. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2002-06-1830
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    1. Yong RL,
    2. Shinojima N,
    3. Fueyo J,
    4. Gumin J,
    5. Vecil GG,
    6. Marini FC,
    7. Bogler O,
    8. Andreeff M and
    9. Lang FF
    : Human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells for intravascular delivery of oncolytic adenovirus Delta24-RGD to human gliomas. Cancer Res 69(23): 8932-8940, 2009. PMID: 19920199. DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-3873
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Kidd S,
    2. Caldwell L,
    3. Dietrich M,
    4. Samudio I,
    5. Spaeth EL,
    6. Watson K,
    7. Shi Y,
    8. Abbruzzese J,
    9. Konopleva M,
    10. Andreeff M and
    11. Marini FC
    : Mesenchymal stromal cells alone or expressing interferon-beta suppress pancreatic tumors in vivo, an effect countered by anti-inflammatory treatment. Cytotherapy 12(5): 615-625, 2010. PMID: 20230221. DOI: 10.3109/14653241003631815
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Deng L,
    2. Gao X,
    3. Fan G and
    4. Yang C
    : Effects of GDNF-transfected marrow stromal cells on rats with intracerebral hemorrhage. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 28(9): 2555-2562, 2019. PMID: 31248739. DOI: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2019.06.002
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Wang J,
    2. Zhu L,
    3. Chen X,
    4. Huang R,
    5. Wang S and
    6. Dong P
    : Human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells functionalized by hybrid baculovirus-adeno-associated viral vectors for targeting hypopharyngeal carcinoma. Stem Cells Dev 28(8): 543-553, 2019. PMID: 30747033. DOI: 10.1089/scd.2018.0252
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Nieddu V,
    2. Piredda R,
    3. Bexell D,
    4. Barton J,
    5. Anderson J,
    6. Sebire N,
    7. Kolluri K,
    8. Janes SM,
    9. Karteris E and
    10. Sala A
    : Engineered human mesenchymal stem cells for neuroblastoma therapeutics. Oncol Rep 42(1): 35-42, 2019. PMID: 31115546. DOI: 10.3892/or.2019.7152
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Relation T,
    2. Yi T,
    3. Guess AJ,
    4. La Perle K,
    5. Otsuru S,
    6. Hasgur S,
    7. Dominici M,
    8. Breuer C and
    9. Horwitz EM
    : Intratumoral delivery of Interferonγ-secreting mesenchymal stromal cells repolarizes tumor-associated macrophages and suppresses neuroblastoma proliferation in vivo. Stem Cells 36(6): 915-924, 2018. PMID: 29430789. DOI: 10.1002/stem.2801
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Kimura K,
    2. Kishida T,
    3. Wakao J,
    4. Tanaka T,
    5. Higashi M,
    6. Fumino S,
    7. Aoi S,
    8. Furukawa T,
    9. Mazda O and
    10. Tajiri T
    : Tumor-homing effect of human mesenchymal stem cells in a TH-MYCN mouse model of neuroblastoma. J Pediatr Surg 51(12): 2068-2073, 2016. PMID: 27686479. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.09.041
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Maniwa J,
    2. Fumino S,
    3. Kimura K,
    4. Tanaka T,
    5. Higashi M,
    6. Kishida T,
    7. Mazda O and
    8. Tajiri T
    : Novel mesenchymal stem cell delivery system as targeted therapy against neuroblastoma using the TH-MYCN mouse model. J Pediatr Surg 54(12): 2600-2605, 2019. PMID: 31627888. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2019.08.023
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Rossig C,
    2. Bollard CM,
    3. Nuchtern JG,
    4. Merchant DA and
    5. Brenner MK
    : Targeting of G(D2)-positive tumor cells by human T lymphocytes engineered to express chimeric T-cell receptor genes. Int J Cancer 94(2): 228-236, 2001. PMID: 11668503. DOI: 10.1002/ijc.1457
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Heczey A,
    2. Louis CU,
    3. Savoldo B,
    4. Dakhova O,
    5. Durett A,
    6. Grilley B,
    7. Liu H,
    8. Wu MF,
    9. Mei Z,
    10. Gee A,
    11. Mehta B,
    12. Zhang H,
    13. Mahmood N,
    14. Tashiro H,
    15. Heslop HE,
    16. Dotti G,
    17. Rooney CM and
    18. Brenner MK
    : CAR T cells administered in combination with lymphodepletion and PD-1 inhibition to patients with neuroblastoma. Mol Ther 25(9): 2214-2224, 2017. PMID: 28602436. DOI: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2017.05.012
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Louis CU,
    2. Savoldo B,
    3. Dotti G,
    4. Pule M,
    5. Yvon E,
    6. Myers GD,
    7. Rossig C,
    8. Russell HV,
    9. Diouf O,
    10. Liu E,
    11. Liu H,
    12. Wu MF,
    13. Gee AP,
    14. Mei Z,
    15. Rooney CM,
    16. Heslop HE and
    17. Brenner MK
    : Antitumor activity and long-term fate of chimeric antigen receptor-positive T cells in patients with neuroblastoma. Blood 118(23): 6050-6056, 2011. PMID: 21984804. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2011-05-354449
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    1. Kambe K,
    2. Iguchi M,
    3. Higashi M,
    4. Yagyu S,
    5. Fumino S,
    6. Kishida T,
    7. Mazda O and
    8. Tajiri T
    : Development of minimally invasive cancer immunotherapy using anti-disialoganglioside GD2 antibody-producing mesenchymal stem cells for a neuroblastoma mouse model. Pediatr Surg Int 39(1): 43, 2022. PMID: 36484857. DOI: 10.1007/s00383-022-05310-z
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Qin JY,
    2. Zhang L,
    3. Clift KL,
    4. Hulur I,
    5. Xiang AP,
    6. Ren BZ and
    7. Lahn BT
    : Systematic comparison of constitutive promoters and the doxycycline-inducible promoter. PLoS One 5(5): e10611, 2010. PMID: 20485554. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010611
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Doronin II,
    2. Vishnyakova PA,
    3. Kholodenko IV,
    4. Ponomarev ED,
    5. Ryazantsev DY,
    6. Molotkovskaya IM and
    7. Kholodenko RV
    : Ganglioside GD2 in reception and transduction of cell death signal in tumor cells. BMC Cancer 14: 295, 2014. PMID: 24773917. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-14-295
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Kholodenko IV,
    2. Kalinovsky DV,
    3. Doronin II,
    4. Deyev SM and
    5. Kholodenko RV
    : Neuroblastoma origin and therapeutic targets for immunotherapy. J Immunol Res 2018: 7394268, 2018. PMID: 30116755. DOI: 10.1155/2018/7394268
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Ahmed M and
    2. Cheung NK
    : Engineering anti-GD2 monoclonal antibodies for cancer immunotherapy. FEBS Lett 588(2): 288-297, 2014. PMID: 24295643. DOI: 10.1016/j.febslet.2013.11.030
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Ari P,
    2. Kars M,
    3. Meany H and
    4. Pestieau S
    : Treatment of transient peripheral neuropathy during chimeric 14.18 antibody therapy in children with neuroblastoma: a case series. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 40(2): e113-e116, 2018. PMID: 28678088. DOI: 10.1097/MPH.0000000000000889
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Gonzalez ME,
    2. Martin EE,
    3. Anwar T,
    4. Arellano-Garcia C,
    5. Medhora N,
    6. Lama A,
    7. Chen YC,
    8. Tanager KS,
    9. Yoon E,
    10. Kidwell KM,
    11. Ge C,
    12. Franceschi RT and
    13. Kleer CG
    : Mesenchymal stem cell-induced DDR2 mediates stromal-breast cancer interactions and metastasis growth. Cell Rep 18(5): 1215-1228, 2017. PMID: 28147276. DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.12.079
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Błogowski W,
    2. Bodnarczuk T and
    3. Starzyńska T
    : Concise review: Pancreatic cancer and bone marrow-derived stem cells. Stem Cells Transl Med 5(7): 938-945, 2016. PMID: 27217346. DOI: 10.5966/sctm.2015-0291
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Ridge SM,
    2. Sullivan FJ and
    3. Glynn SA
    : Mesenchymal stem cells: key players in cancer progression. Mol Cancer 16(1): 31, 2017. PMID: 28148268. DOI: 10.1186/s12943-017-0597-8
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Qiao L,
    2. Xu Z,
    3. Zhao T,
    4. Zhao Z,
    5. Shi M,
    6. Zhao RC,
    7. Ye L and
    8. Zhang X
    : Suppression of tumorigenesis by human mesenchymal stem cells in a hepatoma model. Cell Res 18(4): 500-507, 2008. PMID: 18364678. DOI: 10.1038/cr.2008.40
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Ho IA,
    2. Toh HC,
    3. Ng WH,
    4. Teo YL,
    5. Guo CM,
    6. Hui KM and
    7. Lam PY
    : Human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells suppress human glioma growth through inhibition of angiogenesis. Stem Cells 31(1): 146-155, 2013. PMID: 23034897. DOI: 10.1002/stem.1247
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Song N,
    2. Gao L,
    3. Qiu H,
    4. Huang C,
    5. Cheng H,
    6. Zhou H,
    7. Lv S,
    8. Chen L and
    9. Wang J
    : Mouse bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells inhibit leukemia/lymphoma cell proliferation in vitro and in a mouse model of allogeneic bone marrow transplant. Int J Mol Med 36(1): 139-149, 2015. PMID: 25901937. DOI: 10.3892/ijmm.2015.2191
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Lu L,
    2. Chen G,
    3. Yang J,
    4. Ma Z,
    5. Yang Y,
    6. Hu Y,
    7. Lu Y,
    8. Cao Z,
    9. Wang Y and
    10. Wang X
    : Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells suppress growth and promote the apoptosis of glioma U251 cells through downregulation of the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway. Biomed Pharmacother 112: 108625, 2019. PMID: 30784920. DOI: 10.1016/j.biopha.2019.108625
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Khakoo AY,
    2. Pati S,
    3. Anderson SA,
    4. Reid W,
    5. Elshal MF,
    6. Rovira II,
    7. Nguyen AT,
    8. Malide D,
    9. Combs CA,
    10. Hall G,
    11. Zhang J,
    12. Raffeld M,
    13. Rogers TB,
    14. Stetler-Stevenson W,
    15. Frank JA,
    16. Reitz M and
    17. Finkel T
    : Human mesenchymal stem cells exert potent antitumorigenic effects in a model of Kaposi’s sarcoma. J Exp Med 203(5): 1235-1247, 2006. PMID: 16636132. DOI: 10.1084/jem.20051921
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Meleshina AV,
    2. Cherkasova EI,
    3. Shirmanova MV,
    4. Klementieva NV,
    5. Kiseleva EV,
    6. Snopova LB,
    7. Prodanets NN and
    8. Zagaynova EV
    : Influence of mesenchymal stem cells on metastasis development in mice in vivo. Stem Cell Res Ther 6(1): 15, 2015. PMID: 25888992. DOI: 10.1186/s13287-015-0003-7
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Lee MW,
    2. Ryu S,
    3. Kim DS,
    4. Lee JW,
    5. Sung KW,
    6. Koo HH and
    7. Yoo KH
    : Mesenchymal stem cells in suppression or progression of hematologic malignancy: current status and challenges. Leukemia 33(3): 597-611, 2019. PMID: 30705410. DOI: 10.1038/s41375-018-0373-9
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Schepers K,
    2. Campbell TB and
    3. Passegué E
    : Normal and leukemic stem cell niches: insights and therapeutic opportunities. Cell Stem Cell 16(3): 254-267, 2015. PMID: 25748932. DOI: 10.1016/j.stem.2015.02.014
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    1. Shi Y,
    2. Su J,
    3. Roberts AI,
    4. Shou P,
    5. Rabson AB and
    6. Ren G
    : How mesenchymal stem cells interact with tissue immune responses. Trends Immunol 33(3): 136-143, 2012. PMID: 22227317. DOI: 10.1016/j.it.2011.11.004
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research: 43 (6)
Anticancer Research
Vol. 43, Issue 6
June 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Development of anti-GD2 Antibody-producing Mesenchymal Stem Cells as Cellular Immunotherapy
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
10 + 2 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Development of anti-GD2 Antibody-producing Mesenchymal Stem Cells as Cellular Immunotherapy
MASAFUMI IGUCHI, SHIGEKI YAGYU, KOSUKE KAMBE, MAYUMI HIGASHI, SHIGEHISA FUMINO, TSUNAO KISHIDA, TOMOKO IEHARA, OSAM MAZDA, TATSURO TAJIRI
Anticancer Research Jun 2023, 43 (6) 2417-2424; DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.16409

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Development of anti-GD2 Antibody-producing Mesenchymal Stem Cells as Cellular Immunotherapy
MASAFUMI IGUCHI, SHIGEKI YAGYU, KOSUKE KAMBE, MAYUMI HIGASHI, SHIGEHISA FUMINO, TSUNAO KISHIDA, TOMOKO IEHARA, OSAM MAZDA, TATSURO TAJIRI
Anticancer Research Jun 2023, 43 (6) 2417-2424; DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.16409
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Acknowledgements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Ginsenoside Rh4 Induces Apoptosis Through ROS-Mediated Fas Signaling in Human Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma NPC/HK1 Cells
  • Genome-wide Analysis Highlights rs4671908 and rs2238431 as Predictors of Survival in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
  • Implications of the Cuproptosis Protein SLC31A1 for the Immune Microenvironment and Temozolomide Sensitivity in Glioblastoma
Show more Experimental Studies

Keywords

  • Anti-GD2-antibody
  • drug delivery
  • immunotherapy
  • Mesenchymal stem cell
  • Neuroblastoma
Anticancer Research

© 2026 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire