Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleClinical Studies

Serum Thymidine Kinase 1 – Potential Prostate Cancer Biomarker: A Clinical Study

JAKUB REZAC, LENKA HANOUSKOVA, STEPAN VESELY, KAREL KOTASKA, ALZBETA KANTOROVA, ANNA LINHARTOVA, VOJTECH FIALA, VIKTOR SOUKUP and OTAKAR CAPOUN
Anticancer Research April 2023, 43 (4) 1675-1680; DOI: https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.16319
JAKUB REZAC
1Department of Urology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
LENKA HANOUSKOVA
2Department of Medical Chemistry and Clinical Biochemistry, Motol University Hospital, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
STEPAN VESELY
3Department of Urology, Motol University Hospital, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
KAREL KOTASKA
2Department of Medical Chemistry and Clinical Biochemistry, Motol University Hospital, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
ALZBETA KANTOROVA
1Department of Urology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
ANNA LINHARTOVA
1Department of Urology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
VOJTECH FIALA
1Department of Urology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
VIKTOR SOUKUP
1Department of Urology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
OTAKAR CAPOUN
1Department of Urology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: otakar.capoun{at}vfn.cz
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background/Aim: Serum thymidine kinase 1 (STK1) is a proliferation biomarker that has been used as a diagnostic marker of several malignant diseases. However, there are limited data for prostate cancer (PCa). Patients and Methods: In this study, we retrospectively analysed serum samples from 169 patients with biopsy confirmed PCa, who had been indicated for radical prostatectomy (RP) between 2013-2016. The results were compared with those in serum samples from 39 healthy men. We used commercially available enzymatic immunoassay to determine the levels of STK1. The patients were divided into groups according to the Gleason score (GS) and risk factors for adjuvant radiotherapy (aRT), which were defined as GS 8-10, pT3, and a positive surgical margin. Results: The median serum level of STK1 in PCa patients was 0.289 pmol/l. In the control group, the median value was 0.0116 pmol/l (p<0.001). By comparing the patients with GS≤6 vs. 7 vs. ≥8 (p=0.01), we found statistically significant differences. In the correlation of STK1 values with risk factors, we found statistically significant differences both in comparison of 0 vs. 1 vs. 2 vs. 3 risk factors (p=0.021), as well as ≤1 vs. 2≥ risk factors (p=0.009). Conclusion: The levels of STK1 are significantly higher in patients with PCa than those in healthy controls. Furthermore, STK1 values correlate with GS and predefined risk factors for aRT. Therefore, STK1 can be considered as a potential tumour marker of PCa diagnosis and risk stratification.

Key Words:
  • Prostate cancer
  • thymidine kinase 1
  • STK1
  • serum biomarker

Prostate cancer (PCa) is the second most common male malignancy, accounting for 14% of all diagnosed cancer cases with the incidence steadily growing (1). Currently, it is the third most common cause of cancer mortality among men, accounting for just over 10% of all cancer-related deaths (2). The prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is currently the most frequently used tumour marker in the early detection of PCa, despite its low specificity and low negative predictive value (3). False positives trigger unnecessary biopsies with a certain rate of complications. Furthermore, PCa represents a wide spectrum of diagnoses, ranging from clinically indolent to aggressive, high-grade cancers. PSA-based screening leads to overdiagnosis and overtreatment (4), escalating the overall cost of treatment. New markers could lead to better differentiation of significant cancer as well as improved monitoring of the disease. Therefore, research for novel cost-effective serum and urine diagnostic biomarkers with higher accuracy is needed.

Although almost one hundred potentially useful urine and serum markers for PCa have been reported, none of these have replaced PSA on its own or in a combination with other tumour markers (3, 5, 6). One of the main cancer characteristics is uncontrolled cell proliferation. Proliferative activity of cancer cells correlates with the aggressiveness of the disease. Predictive markers capable of measuring tumour-cell proliferation are clinically valuable because they may improve chances of early detection of tumour-related diseases, as well as its monitoring during therapy (7). Serum thymidine kinase 1 (STK1) is a proliferation biomarker that has already been used as a diagnostic marker for several malignant diseases (8).

STK1 is a cellular enzyme involved in the salvage pathway of DNA precursor synthesis. It catalyses the conversion of thymidine to deoxythymidine monophosphate, which is further phosphorylated to deoxythymidine di- and triphosphates prior incorporation into DNA (9).

The activity of STK1 is cell-cycle dependent and shows a different pattern in normal proliferating cells compared with tumour cells. In normal cells, STK1 activity reaches its peak at late G1 phase/early S phase (10-20-fold increase) and is dramatically reduced to undetectable levels by the end of M phase (10, 11). However, STK1 activity may remain elevated in G2 and M phases of the cell cycle in malignant cells (12), most likely due to disordered regulation of transcription and degradation. High levels of STK1 have been observed in proliferating and malignant cells (13, 14).

In our pilot study, we measured increased concentrations of STK1 in patients with PCa (15). Our aim was to confirm these results in a larger study. We believe that STK1 may prove to be a cost-efficient and minimally invasive diagnostic and monitoring tool for PCa.

Patients and Methods

Patient selection. We performed a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected serum samples from 169 patients with PCa scheduled for radical prostatectomy (RP) between 2013-2016. The results were compared with those in the serum from 39 healthy male volunteers, with an average age of 61 years, without relevant urological or oncological medical history, with negative urine bacterial culture and urine cytology, PSA level under 2 μg/l, and negative digital rectal examination. The Institutional Ethics Committee approved the study. All participants gave their written informed consent.

Sample and data collection. Blood was collected from all patients before RP after overnight fasting via puncture of the cubital vein. The blood was then centrifuged for 10 min at 3,000 rpm (1,450 g) and the serum was aliquoted, immediately frozen, and kept at −70°C until STK1 was analysed. Radical prostatectomy specimens were examined by a specialized pathologist. Tumours were classified according to the tumour, node and metastasis (TNM) classification (16) and graded according to the Gleason score (GS) (17). Healthy volunteers underwent the same blood sampling procedure.

Concentration measurements. For both groups, we measured the STK1 marker level in the serum with the use of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), utilizing a commercially available immunoassay technique ELISA kit (LSBio, Inc, Seattle, WA, USA).

The analytical parameters of the kit were as follows: detection limit 0.063 pmol/l and working range 0.063-4.0 pmol/l [intra-assay coefficient of variation (CV)=5.3%/inter-assay CV=8.6%]. Serum PSA levels were measured using the electrochemiluminescence sandwich immunoassay on the Cobas e6000 analyser (Hitachi, High Technology Corp., Tokyo, Japan).

For statistical analysis, the patients were divided into groups in accordance with GS and risk factors for adjuvant radiotherapy (aRT), which were defined as GS 8-10, pT3 or a positive surgical margin.

Statistical analysis. Statistical data analysis was performed using SAS software (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). Basic statistical data such as mean, standard deviation, variance, median, interquartile range, minimum and maximum were calculated for the measured parameters. For categorical variables, their absolute and relative frequencies were examined. Nonparametric tests (Wilcoxon’s two-sample test and its generalised variant, the so-called Kruskal–Wallis test) were used to compare the distributions of the examined parameters between the tested groups. We tested the age agreement between the examined groups using Two One Sample Test. The relationships between the parameters were investigated using the Spearman correlation coefficient and were expressed graphically using linear regression. Statistical significance was determined at alpha=5%.

Results

The study included 169 patients with PCa aged between 40 and 79 years and 39 healthy subjects aged between 53 and 78 years. The characteristics of the patients and healthy subjects are summarized in Table I.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

The characteristics of the patients and healthy subjects.

The serum levels of STK1 in PCa patients were significantly increased as compared to those in the control group of healthy subjects. The median STK1 level detected in PCa patients was 0.289 pmol/l [standard deviation (SD)=0.289; min-max 0.062-1.78], whereas in the control group was 0.012 pmol/l (SD=0.0742; min-max 0.063-0.364) (p<0.001) (Figure 1, Table I).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Levels of serum thymidine kinase 1 (STK1) (pmol/l) in patients with confirmed prostate cancer and healthy controls.

When comparing patients with GS≤6 vs. 7 vs. ≥8 (p=0.01) (Figure 2, Table II), we found a statistically significant difference, but not when comparing patients with GS≤6 vs. ≥7 (p=1.000). Staging did not show any significant difference neither in the comparison of pT2 vs. pT3a vs. pT3b (p=0.989), nor in the comparison of pT2 vs. pT3a+pT3b (p=1.0) (Table II).

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Correlation between Gleason score and levels of serum thymidine kinase 1 (STK1) (pmol/l).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table II.

Correlation between staging and levels of STK1.

We found a statistically significant correlation of STK1 serum level with risk factors for aRT (GS 8-10, pT3, positive surgical margin), p=0.021 (Figure 3). The lowest levels of STK1 were found in patients with all three risk factors. The difference between patients with no risk factors and to those with at least one risk factor was not significant (p=0.579). Statistically significantly lower levels of STK1 were found when comparing patients with 0 or 1 and patients with 2 or more risk factors (p=0.009) (Table III, Figure 4).

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

Correlation between number of risk factors for adjuvant radiotherapy (Gleason score 8-10, pT3, positive surgical margin) and levels of serum thymidine kinase 1 (STK1) (pmol/l).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table III.

Correlation between risk factors for adjuvant radiotherapy (GS 8-10, pT3, positive surgical margin) and levels of STK1.

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

Correlation between number of risk factors for adjuvant radiotherapy (Gleason score 8-10, pT3, positive surgical margin) and levels of serum thymidine kinase 1 (STK1) (pmol/l).

Correlations between STK1 and PSA density, PSA at the time of diagnosis, prostate health index (PHI), and prostate size measured by TRUS were not statistically significantly different.

Discussion

We compared serum levels of STK1 in patients with PCa and healthy controls using an enzyme immunoassay method utilising a commercially available kit. We showed that serum levels of STK1 in patients with PCa were significantly higher (median 0.289 pmol/l) than those in the control group (median 0.0116 pmol/l).

While PSA will likely remain the most widely used prostate tumour marker in the near future, the need for other diagnostic methods, either on their own or in combination with other tumour markers, is becoming more and more urgent, in particular because of the sensitivity and specificity of the PSA test. The potential new marker must fulfil several requirements such as cost efficiency, minimal invasiveness and repeatability (18).

The results of our study confirm our hypothesis that higher STK1 level is associated with the diagnosis of PCa. The presented results are in accord with the study of Li et al. (19), who demonstrated that STK1 concentration and total PSA were significantly higher in patients with PCa, as compared to patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and healthy individuals [n=123, median 2.5 pmol/l (SD 2.0; min-max 0.2-14.7)]. Furthermore, STK1 concentration was associated with GS, whereas total PSA was not. However, no association was identified between STK1 concentration and total serum PSA. Li et al. also indicated the difficulty in differentiating BPH from PCa, i.e., supporting our aim for the identification of markers to be used in a combination with other molecules. Our results also show the association of STK1 concentrations with the grading of the disease according to GS.

Lundgren et al. (20) measured STK1 in 36 patients, who died of PCa [median 0.30 ng/ml (min-max 0.21-0.41)], and in 294 randomly selected healthy men, and showed that high levels of STK1 can predict PCa-related death in 30 years. Another study by Jagarlamudi et al. (8) compared STKa (serum thymidine kinase activity) and concentration of STK1 in patients with PCa (n=47) to those of healthy blood donors. The results demonstrated that STKa and STK1 concentration differed significantly between patients with PCa and healthy individuals.

In this study, we measured the levels of STK1 in a higher number of patients with PCa than in previous studies. In addition, unlike others, we added risk factors for aRT after RP (GS 8-10, pT3, positive surgical margin), which may prove as a useful predictive combination of parameters with clinical benefits. Our results confirm that STK1 levels are significantly higher in patients with PCa than in healthy controls. Furthermore, STK1 values correlate with the tumour GS and a number of predefined risk factors for aRT. Therefore, STK1 is a promising tumour marker for PCa. It is important to note that the current study was not a clinical trial following specific criteria, rather, it was based on data collected during routine clinical practice. This may limit the reliability of the conclusions drawn.

In the future, we plan to examine a panel of serum and urine biomarkers which could function as a reliable guidance for PCa diagnosis with higher sensitivity and specificity than PSA. In turn, the number of unnecessary prostate biopsies, which are both invasive and pose significant risks for the patients, will be reduced.

Acknowledgements

Supported by the project (Ministry of Health, Czech Republic) for conceptual development of research organisation 00064203 (University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic). Supported by the Ministry of Health, Czech Republic – conceptual development of research organisation 00064165, General University Hospital and the First Faculty of Medicine in Prague.

Footnotes

  • Authors’ Contributions

    Rezac Jakub drafted the manuscript and prepared the figures. Measurements were performed by Hanouskova Lenka, and Kotaska Karel. Kantorova Alzbeta, Linhartova Anna and Fiala Vojtech edited the manuscript. Supervision was performed by Capoun Otakar, Soukup Viktor, and Vesely Stepan.

  • Conflicts of Interest

    The Authors have no conflicts of interest to report in relation to this study.

  • Received January 14, 2023.
  • Revision received January 28, 2023.
  • Accepted January 31, 2023.
  • Copyright © 2023 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Sung H,
    2. Ferlay J,
    3. Siegel RL,
    4. Laversanne M,
    5. Soerjomataram I,
    6. Jemal A and
    7. Bray F
    : Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 71(3): 209-249, 2021. PMID: 33538338. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21660
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    Health at a Glance 2019: OECD Indicators, 2019. Available at: https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/sites/ac388762-en/index.html?itemId=/content/component/ac388762-en [Last accessed on August 30, 2022]
  3. ↵
    1. Filella X and
    2. Foj L
    : Emerging biomarkers in the detection and prognosis of prostate cancer. Clin Chem Lab Med 53(7): 963-973, 2015. PMID: 25581761. DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2014-0988
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Dani H and
    2. Loeb S
    : The role of prostate cancer biomarkers in undiagnosed men. Curr Opin Urol 27(3): 210-216, 2017. PMID: 28212119. DOI: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000384
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Bratt O and
    2. Lilja H
    : Serum markers in prostate cancer detection. Curr Opin Urol 25(1): 59-64, 2015. PMID: 25393274. DOI: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000128
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Shariat SF,
    2. Semjonow A,
    3. Lilja H,
    4. Savage C,
    5. Vickers AJ and
    6. Bjartell A
    : Tumor markers in prostate cancer I: blood-based markers. Acta Oncol 50(Suppl 1): 61-75, 2011. PMID: 21604943. DOI: 10.3109/0284186X.2010.542174
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. He Q,
    2. Fornander T,
    3. Johansson H,
    4. Johansson U,
    5. Hu GZ,
    6. Rutqvist LE and
    7. Skog S
    : Thymidine kinase 1 in serum predicts increased risk of distant or loco-regional recurrence following surgery in patients with early breast cancer. Anticancer Res 26(6C): 4753-4759, 2006. PMID: 17214336.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Jagarlamudi KK,
    2. Hansson LO and
    3. Eriksson S
    : Breast and prostate cancer patients differ significantly in their serum Thymidine kinase 1 (TK1) specific activities compared with those hematological malignancies and blood donors: implications of using serum TK1 as a biomarker. BMC Cancer 15: 66, 2015. PMID: 25881026. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-015-1073-8
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Eriksson S,
    2. Munch-Petersen B,
    3. Johansson K and
    4. Eklund H
    : Structure and function of cellular deoxyribonucleoside kinases. Cell Mol Life Sci 59(8): 1327-1346, 2002. PMID: 12363036. DOI: 10.1007/s00018-002-8511-x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Jagarlamudi KK and
    2. Shaw M
    : Thymidine kinase 1 as a tumor biomarker: technical advances offer new potential to an old biomarker. Biomark Med 12(9): 1035-1048, 2018. PMID: 30039979. DOI: 10.2217/bmm-2018-0157
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Sherley JL and
    2. Kelly TJ
    : Regulation of human thymidine kinase during the cell cycle. J Biol Chem 263(17): 8350-8358, 1988. PMID: 3372530.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    1. Chang ZF and
    2. Huang DY
    : The regulation of thymidine kinase in HL-60 human promyeloleukemia cells. J Biol Chem 268(2): 1266-1271, 1993. PMID: 8419329.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    1. He Q,
    2. Skog S and
    3. Tribukait B
    : Cell cycle related studies on thymidine kinase and its isoenzymes in Ehrlich ascites tumours. Cell Prolif 24(1): 3-14, 1991. PMID: 2009315. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2184.1991.tb01506.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Gasparri F,
    2. Wang N,
    3. Skog S,
    4. Galvani A and
    5. Eriksson S
    : Thymidine kinase 1 expression defines an activated G1 state of the cell cycle as revealed with site-specific antibodies and ArrayScan assays. Eur J Cell Biol 88(12): 779-785, 2009. PMID: 19726104. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcb.2009.06.005
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Hanousková L,
    2. Řezáč J,
    3. Veselý Š,
    4. Průša R and
    5. Kotaška K
    : Thymidine kinase-1 as additional diagnostic marker of prostate cancer. Clin Lab 66(6), 2020. PMID: 32538039. DOI: 10.7754/Clin.Lab.2019.191026
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    The European Association of Urology (EAU) prostate cancer guidelines, 2022. Available at: https://uroweb.org/guidelines/prostate-cancer [Last accessed on August 30, 2022]
  17. ↵
    1. Gleason DF
    : Classification of prostatic carcinomas. Cancer Chemother Rep 50(3): 125-128, 1966. PMID: 5948714.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  18. ↵
    Biomarkers in cancer: an introductory guide for advocates. Available at: https://cancer.wisc.edu/research/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/Biomarkers-in-Cancer.pdf [Last accessed on December 15, 2022]
  19. ↵
    1. Li S,
    2. Zhou J,
    3. Wang Y,
    4. Zhang K,
    5. Yang J,
    6. Zhang X,
    7. Wang C,
    8. Ma H,
    9. Zhou J,
    10. He E and
    11. Skog S
    : Serum thymidine kinase 1 is associated with Gleason score of patients with prostate carcinoma. Oncol Lett 16(5): 6171-6180, 2018. PMID: 30333882. DOI: 10.3892/ol.2018.9345
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Lundgren PO,
    2. Tribukait B,
    3. Kjellman A,
    4. Norming U,
    5. Jagarlmudi K and
    6. Gustafsson O
    : Serum thymidine kinase 1 concentration as a predictive biomarker in prostate cancer. Prostate 82(8): 911-916, 2022. PMID: 35294068. DOI: 10.1002/pros.24335
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research: 43 (4)
Anticancer Research
Vol. 43, Issue 4
April 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Serum Thymidine Kinase 1 – Potential Prostate Cancer Biomarker: A Clinical Study
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
8 + 8 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Serum Thymidine Kinase 1 – Potential Prostate Cancer Biomarker: A Clinical Study
JAKUB REZAC, LENKA HANOUSKOVA, STEPAN VESELY, KAREL KOTASKA, ALZBETA KANTOROVA, ANNA LINHARTOVA, VOJTECH FIALA, VIKTOR SOUKUP, OTAKAR CAPOUN
Anticancer Research Apr 2023, 43 (4) 1675-1680; DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.16319

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Serum Thymidine Kinase 1 – Potential Prostate Cancer Biomarker: A Clinical Study
JAKUB REZAC, LENKA HANOUSKOVA, STEPAN VESELY, KAREL KOTASKA, ALZBETA KANTOROVA, ANNA LINHARTOVA, VOJTECH FIALA, VIKTOR SOUKUP, OTAKAR CAPOUN
Anticancer Research Apr 2023, 43 (4) 1675-1680; DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.16319
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Patients and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Real-world Comparative Study of Androgen Receptor Signaling Inhibitors in Japanese Patients With Non-metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer
  • Adverse Events and Safety Outcomes Associated With Chemotherapy for Inflammatory Bowel Disease–associated Gastrointestinal Cancers
  • Prognostic Impact of Early GNRI Sustainability in Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma Receiving Pembrolizumab
Show more Clinical Studies

Keywords

  • Prostate cancer
  • thymidine kinase 1
  • STK1
  • serum biomarker
Anticancer Research

© 2026 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire