Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleClinical Studies

Positive p16 Immunostaining Is an Independent Prognostic Variable for Disease-free Survival and Overall Survival in Patients With Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Vulva Treated With Radical Surgery and Inguinofemoral Lymphadenectomy: An Italian Single Center Retrospective Study

ANGIOLO GADDUCCI, ENRICO SIMONETTI, STEFANIA COSIO, ANTONIO FANUCCHI, VALENTINA DOLCI, CONCETTA LALISCIA, ANTONIO GIUSEPPE NACCARATO and SABINA PISTOLESI
Anticancer Research April 2023, 43 (4) 1643-1648; DOI: https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.16315
ANGIOLO GADDUCCI
1Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Division of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: angiolo.gadducci{at}unipi.it
ENRICO SIMONETTI
1Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Division of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
STEFANIA COSIO
1Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Division of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
ANTONIO FANUCCHI
1Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Division of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
VALENTINA DOLCI
1Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Division of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
CONCETTA LALISCIA
2Department of New Technologies and Translational Research, Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
ANTONIO GIUSEPPE NACCARATO
3Department of New Technologies and Translational Research, Division of Pathology, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
SABINA PISTOLESI
3Department of New Technologies and Translational Research, Division of Pathology, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background/Aim: The expression of the cyclin–dependent kinase inhibitor p16 correlates with the presence of human papillomavirus. The purpose of this investigation was to assess the prognostic relevance of p16 expression in patients with vulvar squamous cell carcinoma (VSCC) treated with radical surgery followed by adjuvant (chemo) radiation in selected cases. Patients and Methods: Seventy-eight patients were analyzed retrospectively. Results: Positive p16 immunostaining was detected in 19 (24.4%) patients. Five-year disease-free survival (DFS) and 5-year overall survival (OS) were better in p16-positive compared to p16-negative patients (83.9% versus 37.3% p=0.002 and 91.7% versus 57.6%, p=0.003, respectively). p16 expression retained prognostic relevance at multivariate analysis for both DFS and OS. Conclusion: p16 expression was detected in 24.4% of patients with VSCC and was found to be an independent prognostic variable for both DFS and OS.

Key Words:
  • p16 expression
  • vulvar squamous cell carcinoma
  • radical surgery
  • inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy
  • relapse

GLOBOCAN estimates of the worldwide incidence and mortality for 36 cancers reported 45.240 new cases of vulvar cancer and 17.427 deaths due to this malignancy in 2020 (1). According to the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program, vulvar cancer represents 0.3% of all new cancer cases, with a rate of 2.6 per 100,000 women per year in the USA (2). Vulvar squamous cell carcinoma (VSCC), which is the most common histological type, has an age dependent incidence ranging from 0.4:100,000 women in their thirties to 20:100,000 in over seventy-year-old (3). Tumor is staged according to the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system (4-6).

Surgery, consisting of tailored radical vulvectomy and inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy or sentinel node biopsy in selected cases, is the primary treatment of early stage disease (2, 7-10). The risk of relapse is mainly dependent on FIGO stage, tumor size, lymph node status, lymph-vascular space involvement (LVSI) and perineural invasion (PNI) (3-6, 11-18). Adjuvant radiotherapy is usually administered to patients with more than one intra-nodal metastasis, with extra-nodal tumor growth, with clinically suspected or fixed ulcerated groin nodes, and with surgical positive margins not amenable of re-excision (8, 9, 14). This adjuvant treatment can also be taken into consideration in patients with nodal involvement regardless of the number of positive nodes, especially in presence of LVSI (19). A large US population-based analysis appeared to suggest that the addition of adjuvant chemotherapy reduced the risk of death in node-positive patients who underwent adjuvant radiotherapy (20). Patients with locally advanced VSCC usually undergo radiation or concurrent chemoradiation either as definitive treatment or neoadjuvant treatment followed by personalized surgery (21).

VSCC can develop through both human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated and HPV-independent pathways, and these variants have different morphological and molecular features, precursor lesions and clinical outcome (22-24). The precursor of HPV-associated VSCC is the usual-type vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (uVIN), whereas the precursor of HPV-unrelated VSCC is the differentiated vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (dVIN). The peak of incidence is the 4th-5th decade and 5th-7th decade for HPV-related and HPV–unrelated VSSC, respectively. The expression of the cyclin–dependent kinase inhibitor p16INK4A (p16) closely correlates with the presence of high-risk HPV (25-28). The viral oncoprotein E7 inactivates the protein encoded by the retinoblastoma gene, which exerts a negative feedback on p16. Therefore, p16 expression is a surrogate marker of HPV-dependent neoplasia. Most HPV-unrelated VSCCs are associated with areas of lichen sclerosus and often harbor TP53 mutations (29-32).

The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the incidence and the prognostic relevance of p16 expression in patients with VSCC treated with radical vulvectomy and inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy followed by adjuvant (chemo)radiation in high-risk cases.

Patients and Methods

This investigation retrospectively analyzed 78 patients with VSCC treated with primary radical surgery (June 2004-June 2021), of whom representative formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor tissue samples were available at our Hospital. Seventy-four patients underwent inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy, and 4 did not. Of the latter, 3 patients had stromal invasion less than 1 mm (FIGO stage IA) and the other one, with stromal invasion of 7 mm, had very old age (91 years) and unfavorable performance status.

Each tumor was retrospectively classified according to the criteria of FIGO 2021 (6).

Representative samples of each case were stained with haematoxylin and eosin for standard morphologic evaluation and histologic features were defined according to FIGO 2021 criteria. FFPE representative tumour samples were stained for p16 (E6H4). The antibody was acquired from Ventana Medical Systems, Inc., (Oro Valley, AZ, USA) and was “ready to use”. Immunostainings were performed on Ventana BenchMark ULTRA System according to the vendor protocols and were evaluated as positive or negative by two independent pathologists (S.P and A.G.N).

Postoperative radiotherapy was usually given to patients with more than one intra-nodal metastasis or with extra-nodal tumor growth, and sometimes to patients with negative nodes but with positive margins not amenable of re-excision. The targets, doses and times of radiotherapy have been detailed in a previous article (18).

Two patients were lost to follow-up. Seventy-six patients were periodically examined until September 2022. Among these the median follow-up of survivors was 52 months (range, 15-194 months).

Statistical methods. Two-tailed Fisher’s exact test was used both to correlate p16 positive immunostaining with patient characteristics and the clinical and histopathological variables with the risk of relapse.

The time from surgery to first relapse or death from any cause without relapse was defined as disease-free survival (DFS). The time from surgery to death or last observation was defined as overall survival (OS).

The cumulative probability of DFS and OS was estimated according to the Kaplan-Meier product-limit method. The log-rank test was used to compare the homogeneity of DFS and OS functions across strata defined by categories of prognostic variables. A multiple regression analysis based on the Cox proportional hazard model was used to test jointly the relative importance of variables as predictors of survival times. Significance level was set to 5%, and the software IBM SPSS ver. 13 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA) was used to carry out the analysis.

Results

Patient characteristics are shown in Table I. At presentation, median age of patients was 74 years old (range, 35-91 years). As shown in the Table II, p16 positive immunostaining rate was significantly higher in patients with early stage (p=0.015), with tumor size ≤2 cm (p=0.024), with stromal invasion ≤5 mm (p=0.003), with negative nodes (p=0.015), without LVSI (p=0.031) and without PNI (p=0.031).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

Patient characteristics (n=78).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table II.

p16 positive immunostaining by patient characteristics.

Nineteen patients underwent adjuvant radiotherapy, and adjuvant cisplatin–based concurrent chemotherapy was added in 9 of these. One patient received adjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin 50 mg/m2 + paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 every 3 weeks for 5 cycles for the presence of 9 histologically proven positive groin nodes and extensive LVSI on the surgical samples.

Follow-up data were available for 76 patients. Forty (51.3%) patients relapsed after a median time of 12.0 months after surgery (range, 2-147 months). The failure was local in 23 (57.5%) patients, inguinal in 5 (12.5%), distant in 3 (7.5%) (lung in 2 and pelvic nodes in 1), local + inguinal in 3 (7.5%), local + distant in one (2.5%) (para-aortic and pelvic nodes), local + inguinal + distant in one (2.5%) (pelvic nodes), and inguinal + distant in 4 (10.0%) (pelvic nodes in 3 and para-aortic + mediastinal nodes in one).

The relapse rate significantly correlated with FIGO stage (p=0.037), tumor size (p=0.013), nodal status (p=0.037), LVSI (p=0.034) and p16 expression (p=0.003) (Table III). At present, 37 patients (48.7%) are alive with no evidence of tumor and 4 (5.3%) are alive with tumor relapse. Twenty-nine patients (38.1%) died of tumor and 6 patients (7.9%) died for intercurrent disease with no evidence of tumor.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table III.

Relapse rate by prognostic variables (n=76)*.

At univariate analysis, DFS correlated with FIGO stage (p=0.001), tumor size (p=0.01), stromal invasion (p=0.02), nodal status (p=0.001), LVSI (p<0.001), PNI (p=0.009) and p16 expression (p=0.002) (Table IV) (Figure 1). OS was significantly related to FIGO stage (p<0.001), tumor grade (p=0.039), stromal invasion (p=0.015), nodal status (p<0.001), LVSI (p<0.001), PNI (p=0.006) and p16 expression (p=0.003) (Table V), (Figure 2).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table IV.

Disease-free survival by prognostic variables (Univariate analysis).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Disease–free survival of patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva according to p16 expression.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table V.

Overall survival by prognostic variables (Univariate analysis).

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Overall survival of patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva according to p16 expression.

At multivariate analysis, LVSI and p16 immunoreactivity were independent prognostic variables for both DFS and OS (Table VI).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table VI.

Variables predictive of disease-free survival and overall survival by multivariate analysis.

Discussion

uVIN is usually p16 positive and p53 negative on immunohistochemistry, and has a lower chance to progress to VSCC compared with dVIN, whereas the latter is usually p16 negative and p53 positive (33-35). HPV-positive VSCCs develop from uVIN, and HPV–related oncogenic pathway accounts for 20-40% of VSCC cases (23, 30).

In the present investigation positive p16 immunostaining, which is a surrogate marker of HPV-dependent neoplasia, was detected in 24.4% of patients, and it was found to be more frequent in those with early FIGO stage, with small tumor size, with stromal invasion ≤5 mm, with negative nodes, without LVSI and without PNI. At univariate analysis, FIGO stage, stromal invasion, nodal status, LVSI and PNI were significantly related to the clinical outcome of patients, in agreement with the literature (3-6, 11-18). p16 expression correlated with DFS and OS both at univariate and multivariate analysis. It is noteworthy that patients with p16 negative immunostaining had a 3.030-fold higher risk of relapse and a 4.827-fold higher risk of death compared to those with p16 positive immunostaining.

It is worth noting that HPV-positive head and neck tumors appear to be more responsive to radiotherapy and chemotherapy than HPV-negative tumors, and that p16 expression is associated with better DFS and OS (36-39).

Our data confirm the prognostic relevance of p16 expression in patients with VSCC treated with radical surgery followed by adjuvant radiotherapy or concurrent chemoradiation in high-risk cases. We must take into consideration that the 2021 revision of the FIGO staging strongly recommends specifying the HPV status (HPV-related or HPV-unrelated) of VSCC, that can be assessed with p16 immunoreactivity and/or molecular testing for HPV (5, 6).

Footnotes

  • Authors’ Contributions

    Conceptualization, writing-original draft: AG; data curation, formal analysis, methodology: AG, ES, SC, VD, SP. writing-review and editing: AG, ES, SC, AF, VD, CL, AGN, SP.

  • Conflicts of Interest

    The Authors declare no conflict of interest in relation to this study.

  • Received January 19, 2023.
  • Revision received January 30, 2023.
  • Accepted February 1, 2023.
  • Copyright © 2023 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Sung H,
    2. Ferlay J,
    3. Siegel RL,
    4. Laversanne M,
    5. Soerjomataram I,
    6. Jemal A and
    7. Bray F
    : Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 71(3): 209-249, 2021. PMID: 33538338. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21660
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Capria A,
    2. Tahir N and
    3. Fatehi M
    : Vulva cancer. StatPearls [Internet], 2022. PMID: 33620867.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Gadducci A,
    2. Tana R,
    3. Barsotti C,
    4. Guerrieri ME and
    5. Genazzani AR
    : Clinico-pathological and biological prognostic variables in squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 83(1): 71-83, 2012. PMID: 22015047. DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2011.09.003
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Pecorelli S
    : Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the vulva, cervix, and endometrium. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 105(2): 103-104, 2009. PMID: 19367689. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2009.02.012
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board
    : Female Genital Tumours, 5th edn. Lyon, France, IARC publications, pp. 419-449, 2020.
  6. ↵
    1. Olawaiye AB,
    2. Cotler J,
    3. Cuello MA,
    4. Bhatla N,
    5. Okamoto A,
    6. Wilailak S,
    7. Purandare CN,
    8. Lindeque G,
    9. Berek JS and
    10. Kehoe S
    : FIGO staging for carcinoma of the vulva: 2021 revision. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 155(1): 43-47, 2021. PMID: 34520062. DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.13880
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Ansink A and
    2. van der Velden J
    : Surgical interventions for early squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000(2): CD002036, 2000. PMID: 10796849. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002036
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Oonk MHM,
    2. Planchamp F,
    3. Baldwin P,
    4. Bidzinski M,
    5. Brännström M,
    6. Landoni F,
    7. Mahner S,
    8. Mahantshetty U,
    9. Mirza M,
    10. Petersen C,
    11. Querleu D,
    12. Regauer S,
    13. Rob L,
    14. Rouzier R,
    15. Ulrikh E,
    16. van der Velden J,
    17. Vergote I,
    18. Woelber L and
    19. van der Zee AGJ
    : European Society of Gynaecological Oncology guidelines for the management of patients with vulvar cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 27(4): 832-837, 2017. PMID: 28441255. DOI: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000975
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. Koh WJ,
    2. Greer BE,
    3. Abu-Rustum NR,
    4. Campos SM,
    5. Cho KR,
    6. Chon HS,
    7. Chu C,
    8. Cohn D,
    9. Crispens MA,
    10. Dizon DS,
    11. Dorigo O,
    12. Eifel PJ,
    13. Fisher CM,
    14. Frederick P,
    15. Gaffney DK,
    16. Han E,
    17. Higgins S,
    18. Huh WK,
    19. Lurain JR 3rd.,
    20. Mariani A,
    21. Mutch D,
    22. Nagel C,
    23. Nekhlyudov L,
    24. Fader AN,
    25. Remmenga SW,
    26. Reynolds RK,
    27. Tillmanns T,
    28. Ueda S,
    29. Valea FA,
    30. Wyse E,
    31. Yashar CM,
    32. McMillian N and
    33. Scavone J
    : Vulvar cancer, version 1.2017, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 15(1): 92-120, 2017. PMID: 28040721. DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2017.0008
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. Te Grootenhuis NC,
    2. van der Zee AG,
    3. van Doorn HC,
    4. van der Velden J,
    5. Vergote I,
    6. Zanagnolo V,
    7. Baldwin PJ,
    8. Gaarenstroom KN,
    9. van Dorst EB,
    10. Trum JW,
    11. Slangen BF,
    12. Runnebaum IB,
    13. Tamussino K,
    14. Hermans RH,
    15. Provencher DM,
    16. de Bock GH,
    17. de Hullu JA and
    18. Oonk MH
    : Sentinel nodes in vulvar cancer: Long-term follow-up of the GROningen INternational Study on Sentinel nodes in Vulvar cancer (GROINSS-V) I. Gynecol Oncol 140(1): 8-14, 2016. PMID: 26428940. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.09.077
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Maggino T,
    2. Landoni F,
    3. Sartori E,
    4. Zola P,
    5. Gadducci A,
    6. Alessi C,
    7. Soldà M,
    8. Coscio S,
    9. Spinetti G,
    10. Maneo A,
    11. Ferrero A and
    12. Konishi De Toffoli G
    : Patterns of recurrence in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva. A multicenter CTF Study. Cancer 89(1): 116-122, 2000. PMID: 10897008. DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(20000701)89:1<116::aid-cncr16>3.0.co;2-4
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Klapdor R,
    2. Wölber L,
    3. Hanker L,
    4. Schmalfeldt B,
    5. Canzler U,
    6. Fehm T,
    7. Luyten A,
    8. Hellriegel M,
    9. Kosse J,
    10. Heiss C,
    11. Hantschmann P,
    12. Mallmann P,
    13. Tanner B,
    14. Pfisterer J,
    15. Jückstock J,
    16. Hilpert F,
    17. de Gregorio N,
    18. Hillemanns P,
    19. Fürst ST and
    20. Mahner S
    : Predictive factors for lymph node metastases in vulvar cancer. An analysis of the AGO-CaRE-1 multicenter study. Gynecol Oncol 154(3): 565-570, 2019. PMID: 31227222. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.06.013
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Woelber L,
    2. Griebel LF,
    3. Eulenburg C,
    4. Sehouli J,
    5. Jueckstock J,
    6. Hilpert F,
    7. de Gregorio N,
    8. Hasenburg A,
    9. Ignatov A,
    10. Hillemanns P,
    11. Fuerst S,
    12. Strauss HG,
    13. Baumann KH,
    14. Thiel FC,
    15. Mustea A,
    16. Meier W,
    17. Harter P,
    18. Wimberger P,
    19. Hanker LC,
    20. Schmalfeldt B,
    21. Canzler U,
    22. Fehm T,
    23. Luyten A,
    24. Hellriegel M,
    25. Kosse J,
    26. Heiss C,
    27. Hantschmann P,
    28. Mallmann P,
    29. Tanner B,
    30. Pfisterer J,
    31. Richter B,
    32. Neuser P and
    33. Mahner S
    : Role of tumour-free margin distance for loco-regional control in vulvar cancer-a subset analysis of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie CaRE-1 multicenter study. Eur J Cancer 69: 180-188, 2016. PMID: 27837710. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2016.09.038
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Micheletti L,
    2. Preti M,
    3. Cintolesi V,
    4. Corvetto E,
    5. Privitera S,
    6. Palmese E and
    7. Benedetto C
    : Prognostic impact of reduced tumor-free margin distance on long-term survival in FIGO stage IB/II vulvar squamous cell carcinoma. J Gynecol Oncol 29(5): e61, 2018. PMID: 30022627. DOI: 10.3802/jgo.2018.29.e61
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Te Grootenhuis NC,
    2. Pouwer AW,
    3. de Bock GH,
    4. Hollema H,
    5. Bulten J,
    6. van der Zee AGJ,
    7. de Hullu JA and
    8. Oonk MHM
    : Margin status revisited in vulvar squamous cell carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 154(2): 266-275, 2019. PMID: 31109660. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.05.010
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Long Y,
    2. Yao DS,
    3. Wei YS,
    4. Wei CH and
    5. Chen XY
    : Prognostic significance of perineural invasion in vulvar squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Manag Res 11: 4461-4469, 2019. PMID: 31191008. DOI: 10.2147/CMAR.S198047
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Salcedo MP,
    2. Sood AK,
    3. Dos Reis R,
    4. Ramalingam P,
    5. Chen C,
    6. Frumovitz M,
    7. Jhingran A,
    8. Pitcher B,
    9. Ramirez PT and
    10. Schmeler KM
    : Perineural invasion (PNI) in vulvar carcinoma: A review of 421 cases. Gynecol Oncol 152(1): 101-105, 2019. PMID: 30396690. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.10.035
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Gadducci A,
    2. Pistolesi S,
    3. Cosio S,
    4. Comunale C,
    5. Fanucchi A and
    6. Naccarato AG
    : Perineural invasion correlates with common pathological variables and clinical outcomes of patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva treated with primary radical surgery and inguinal-femoral lymphadenectomy. In Vivo 35(2): 1051-1056, 2021. PMID: 33622901. DOI: 10.21873/invivo.12349
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    1. Serre E,
    2. Raimond E,
    3. Diguisto C,
    4. Bendifallah S,
    5. Body G,
    6. Touboul C,
    7. Graesslin O,
    8. Carcopino X,
    9. Daraï E,
    10. Ouldamer L and Groupe de Recherche FRANCOGYN
    : Inguino-femoral radiotherapy in vulvar squamous cell carcinoma: clues to revised indications in patients with only one intracapsular lymph node metastasis. Acta Oncol 59(5): 518-524, 2020. PMID: 31718368. DOI: 10.1080/0284186X.2019.1687934
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Gill BS,
    2. Bernard ME,
    3. Lin JF,
    4. Balasubramani GK,
    5. Rajagopalan MS,
    6. Sukumvanich P,
    7. Krivak TC,
    8. Olawaiye AB,
    9. Kelley JL and
    10. Beriwal S
    : Impact of adjuvant chemotherapy with radiation for node-positive vulvar cancer: A National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) analysis. Gynecol Oncol 137(3): 365-372, 2015. PMID: 25868965. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.03.056
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Gadducci A and
    2. Aletti GD
    : Locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva: A challenging question for gynecologic oncologists. Gynecol Oncol 158(1): 208-217, 2020. PMID: 32460996. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.05.021
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Wohlmuth C and
    2. Wohlmuth-Wieser I
    : Vulvar malignancies: an interdisciplinary perspective. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 17(12): 1257-1276, 2019. PMID: 31829526. DOI: 10.1111/ddg.13995
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Williams A,
    2. Syed S,
    3. Velangi S and
    4. Ganesan R
    : New directions in vulvar cancer pathology. Curr Oncol Rep 21(10): 88, 2019. PMID: 31418120. DOI: 10.1007/s11912-019-0833-z
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Singh N and
    2. Gilks CB
    : Vulval squamous cell carcinoma and its precursors. Histopathology 76(1): 128-138, 2020. PMID: 31846523. DOI: 10.1111/his.13989
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Klaes R,
    2. Friedrich T,
    3. Spitkovsky D,
    4. Ridder R,
    5. Rudy W,
    6. Petry U,
    7. Dallenbach-Hellweg G,
    8. Schmidt D and
    9. von Knebel Doeberitz M
    : Overexpression of p16(INK4A) as a specific marker for dysplastic and neoplastic epithelial cells of the cervix uteri. Int J Cancer 92(2): 276-284, 2001. PMID: 11291057. DOI: 10.1002/ijc.1174
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. O’Neill CJ and
    2. McCluggage WG
    : p16 expression in the female genital tract and its value in diagnosis. Adv Anat Pathol 13(1): 8-15, 2006. PMID: 16462152. DOI: 10.1097/01.pap.0000201828.92719.f3
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Barlow EL,
    2. Lambie N,
    3. Donoghoe MW,
    4. Naing Z and
    5. Hacker NF
    : The clinical relevance of p16 and p53 status in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva. J Oncol 2020: 3739075, 2020. PMID: 32280343. DOI: 10.1155/2020/3739075
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Hoevenaars BM,
    2. van der Avoort IA,
    3. de Wilde PC,
    4. Massuger LF,
    5. Melchers WJ,
    6. de Hullu JA and
    7. Bulten J
    : A panel of p16(INK4A), MIB1 and p53 proteins can distinguish between the 2 pathways leading to vulvar squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Cancer 123(12): 2767-2773, 2008. PMID: 18798277. DOI: 10.1002/ijc.23857
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Nooij LS,
    2. Ter Haar NT,
    3. Ruano D,
    4. Rakislova N,
    5. van Wezel T,
    6. Smit VTHBM,
    7. Trimbos BJBMZ,
    8. Ordi J,
    9. van Poelgeest MIE and
    10. Bosse T
    : Genomic characterization of vulvar (pre)cancers identifies distinct molecular subtypes with prognostic significance. Clin Cancer Res 23(22): 6781-6789, 2017. PMID: 28899974. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-1302
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. ↵
    1. Hinten F,
    2. Molijn A,
    3. Eckhardt L,
    4. Massuger LFAG,
    5. Quint W,
    6. Bult P,
    7. Bulten J,
    8. Melchers WJG and
    9. de Hullu JA
    : Vulvar cancer: Two pathways with different localization and prognosis. Gynecol Oncol 149(2): 310-317, 2018. PMID: 29555332. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.03.003
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Thuijs NB,
    2. van Beurden M,
    3. Bruggink AH,
    4. Steenbergen RDM,
    5. Berkhof J and
    6. Bleeker MCG
    : Vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia: Incidence and long-term risk of vulvar squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Cancer 148(1): 90-98, 2021. PMID: 32638382. DOI: 10.1002/ijc.33198
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Leis M,
    2. Singh A,
    3. Li C,
    4. Ahluwalia R,
    5. Fleming P and
    6. Lynde CW
    : Risk of vulvar squamous cell carcinoma in lichen sclerosus and lichen planus: a systematic review. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 44(2): 182-192, 2022. PMID: 34678521. DOI: 10.1016/j.jogc.2021.09.023
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Bornstein J,
    2. Bogliatto F,
    3. Haefner HK,
    4. Stockdale CK,
    5. Preti M,
    6. Bohl TG,
    7. Reutter J and ISSVD Terminology Committee
    : The 2015 International Society for the Study of Vulvovaginal Disease (ISSVD) terminology of vulvar squamous intraepithelial lesions. J Low Genit Tract Dis 20(1): 11-14, 2016. PMID: 26704327. DOI: 10.1097/LGT.0000000000000169
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Tan A,
    2. Bieber AK,
    3. Stein JA and
    4. Pomeranz MK
    : Diagnosis and management of vulvar cancer: A review. J Am Acad Dermatol 81(6): 1387-1396, 2019. PMID: 31349045. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2019.07.055
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Dasgupta S,
    2. Ewing-Graham PC,
    3. Swagemakers SMA,
    4. van der Spek PJ,
    5. van Doorn HC,
    6. Noordhoek Hegt V,
    7. Koljenović S and
    8. van Kemenade FJ
    : Precursor lesions of vulvar squamous cell carcinoma - histology and biomarkers: A systematic review. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 147: 102866, 2020. PMID: 32058913. DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2020.102866
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Bol V and
    2. Grégoire V
    : Biological basis for increased sensitivity to radiation therapy in HPV-positive head and neck cancers. Biomed Res Int 2014: 696028, 2014. PMID: 24804233. DOI: 10.1155/2014/696028
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Nevens D and
    2. Nuyts S
    : HPV-positive head and neck tumours, a distinct clinical entity. B-ENT 11(2): 81-87, 2015. PMID: 26563006.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Marcu LG
    : Future treatment directions for HPV-associated head and neck cancer based on radiobiological rationale and current clinical evidence. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 103: 27-36, 2016. PMID: 27221393. DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2016.05.002
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Saito Y,
    2. Hayashi R,
    3. Iida Y,
    4. Mizumachi T,
    5. Fujii T,
    6. Matsumoto F,
    7. Beppu T,
    8. Yoshida M,
    9. Shinomiya H,
    10. Kamiyama R,
    11. Kitano M,
    12. Yokoshima K,
    13. Fujimoto Y,
    14. Hama T,
    15. Yamashita T,
    16. Okami K,
    17. Miura K,
    18. Fujisawa T,
    19. Sano D,
    20. Kato H,
    21. Minami S,
    22. Sugasawa M,
    23. Masuda M,
    24. Ota I,
    25. Iwae S,
    26. Kawata R,
    27. Monden N,
    28. Imai T,
    29. Asakage T,
    30. Okada M,
    31. Yoshikawa T,
    32. Tanioka K,
    33. Kitayama M,
    34. Doi M,
    35. Fujii S,
    36. Fujii M,
    37. Oridate N,
    38. Nakamizo M,
    39. Yoshimoto S,
    40. Homma A,
    41. Nibu KI and
    42. Yane K
    : Optimization of therapeutic strategy for p16-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: Multi-institutional observational study based on the national Head and Neck Cancer Registry of Japan. Cancer 126(18): 4177-4187, 2020. PMID: 32648953. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.33062
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research: 43 (4)
Anticancer Research
Vol. 43, Issue 4
April 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Positive p16 Immunostaining Is an Independent Prognostic Variable for Disease-free Survival and Overall Survival in Patients With Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Vulva Treated With Radical Surgery and Inguinofemoral Lymphadenectomy: An Italian Single Cent…
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
8 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Positive p16 Immunostaining Is an Independent Prognostic Variable for Disease-free Survival and Overall Survival in Patients With Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Vulva Treated With Radical Surgery and Inguinofemoral Lymphadenectomy: An Italian Single Center Retrospective Study
ANGIOLO GADDUCCI, ENRICO SIMONETTI, STEFANIA COSIO, ANTONIO FANUCCHI, VALENTINA DOLCI, CONCETTA LALISCIA, ANTONIO GIUSEPPE NACCARATO, SABINA PISTOLESI
Anticancer Research Apr 2023, 43 (4) 1643-1648; DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.16315

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Positive p16 Immunostaining Is an Independent Prognostic Variable for Disease-free Survival and Overall Survival in Patients With Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Vulva Treated With Radical Surgery and Inguinofemoral Lymphadenectomy: An Italian Single Center Retrospective Study
ANGIOLO GADDUCCI, ENRICO SIMONETTI, STEFANIA COSIO, ANTONIO FANUCCHI, VALENTINA DOLCI, CONCETTA LALISCIA, ANTONIO GIUSEPPE NACCARATO, SABINA PISTOLESI
Anticancer Research Apr 2023, 43 (4) 1643-1648; DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.16315
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Patients and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Awareness, Utilization, and Barriers to Fluorescence Ureteral Navigation in Japan: A Nationwide Survey Study
  • Clinical Parameters and Radiomics of Vestibular Schwannomas in NF2-related Schwannomatosis
  • Prognostic Impact of Claudin18.2 and TROP2 Expression in Advanced Gastric Cancer Treated With Nivolumab
Show more Clinical Studies

Keywords

  • p16 expression
  • vulvar squamous cell carcinoma
  • radical surgery
  • inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy
  • relapse
Anticancer Research

© 2026 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire