Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleExperimental Studies

Cut-off Analysis of HLA-A and HLA-B/C Expression as a Potential Prognosticator of Favorable Survival in Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer

STEFAN STEFANOVIC, RALPH WIRTZ, MARC SÜTTERLIN, UROS KARIC, ANDREAS SCHNEEWEISS, THOMAS M. DEUTSCH and MARKUS WALLWIENER
Anticancer Research April 2023, 43 (4) 1449-1454; DOI: https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.16293
STEFAN STEFANOVIC
1Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Mannheim University Hospital, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: stefan.stefanovic{at}umm.de
RALPH WIRTZ
2Stratifyer Molecular Pathology GmbH, Cologne, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MARC SÜTTERLIN
1Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Mannheim University Hospital, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
UROS KARIC
3Medical Statistics, IMDI Science Center, Belgrade, Serbia;
4Hospital for Infectious and Tropical Diseases, Belgrade University School of Medicine, Belgrade, Serbia;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
ANDREAS SCHNEEWEISS
5National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg University Hospital, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany;
6German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
THOMAS M. DEUTSCH
7Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heidelberg University Hospital, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MARKUS WALLWIENER
7Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heidelberg University Hospital, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background/Aim: Loss of differentiation of breast cancer cells in association with a down-regulated class I human leukocyte antigen (HLA) expression can lead to proliferation unhampered by cytotoxic T lymphocytes, which has been proven to be of prognostic relevance. The objective of this study was to determine the levels of HLA-A and HLA-B/C expression in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) cells and their usefulness for predicting 5-year survival. Materials and Methods: This prospective double-blinded cohort study analyzed patients starting a new line of therapy for MBC. RT-qPCR was used to determine the levels of HLA-A and B/C expression in MBC cells and the mRNA-based tumor intrinsic subtype. Two receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC) were constructed in order to determine whether HLA-A and HLA-B/C expression levels can be used for predicting 5-year survival. Youden J points, and sensitivity and specificity optimized cut-off points were determined for both ROC curves. Results: We enrolled 34 patients. The ROC curve for HLA-B/C had the highest AUC compared to HLA-A (0.55 vs. 0.42). High levels of HLA-A and HLA-B/C expression (40-ΔΔCT of 33.5 and 31.9, respectively) were highly specific (reaching 87.5% for HLA-A and even 100% specificity for HLA-B/C) yet insensitive for five-year survival in our study. Conclusion: High expression of certain class I HLA molecule subtypes by MBCs, in particular high HLA-A or B/C expression by MBC cells seems very specific in predicting the 5-year survival. We determined cut-off values for these HLA molecule clusters with high specificity, which might help identify patients with a favorable prognosis as prognosticators of a 5-year overall survival if their sensitivity is improved in larger prospective cohorts.

Key Words:
  • Breast cancer
  • HLA-A
  • HLA-B/C
  • cut-off
  • prognosticator

Breast cancer (BC) is one of the most prevalent female malignant neoplasms and the most common cause of cancer-related death in women worldwide (1). Approximately 8% of women in Germany are diagnosed with breast cancer at a point when metastatic disease is already present (2). Systemic treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) includes molecularly targeted agents like HER2 antibodies, endocrine therapies, immunotherapies and inhibitors of PIK3CA, PARP, CDK4/6 or mTOR (3). However, the prognosis of MBC is still dismal (4).

It has been well established that tumor growth can be stemmed by cytotoxic (CD8+) T lymphocytes (CTLs) through immune surveillance (5, 6). Namely, tumor antigens can be presented to CTLs in a complex with class I HLA molecules that are normally found on most human cells (7, 8). CTLs activated in such a manner destroy tumor cells through mechanisms that have been described numerous times in the context of immune responses to intracellular antigens (most often viruses and intracellular bacteria) (1, 5, 7).

However, de-differentiation of tumor cells can lead to a reduction or a complete loss of class I HLA expression in such cells (9-11). As one would expect, this phenomenon has been associated with a poor prognosis in several tumors and breast cancer is not an exception (6, 12). Also, tumors with a reduced class I HLA levels tend to be of a higher grade compared to those with normal levels (12). Beta-2 microglobulin (β2m) is paramount for the stability and function of HLA class I molecules and can serve as a surrogate marker for HLA class I expression (13). Finally, some tumor cells have been shown to express placenta-like or immunologically dysfunctional HLA types like HLA-G and HLA-J (14, 15).

The objective of this study was to determine the levels of HLA-A and HLA-B/C expression in MBC cells above which a statistically significant number of patients will survive beyond 5 years.

Materials and Methods

This was a prospective double-blinded cohort study that analyzed 34 patients treated for metastatic breast cancer at the German National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University, Germany, and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Heidelberg, Germany from March 2010 to May 2015. Initiation of a new line of therapy was an enrollment criterion for all patients.

RT-qPCR technology was used in order to determine the extent of HLA-A, B and C expression in breast cancer cells as well as their intrinsic subtype, while utilizing CALM2 as the housekeeping gene, according to established protocols (16).

The relative gene expression was presented as 40-ΔΔCT with higher values corresponding to higher mRNA counts in the tissue biopsy sample.

The study participants were restaged for disease progression every 3 months until loss to follow-up or death. The Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) system was used for this purpose. Electronic health records and medical histories were also searched in order to precisely define date of death, in case of such an unfortunate outcome.

Two receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed in order to determine the cut-off values of HLA-A and HLA-B/C mRNA expression levels in MBC cells that can be useful for predicting survival beyond 5 years. To this end, Youden J points were calculated for the two ROC curves with consecutive determination of sensitivity and specificity at the respective J points. Finally, we identified sensitivity and specificity optimized cut-off points.

Both patients and physicians were unaware of the patients’ MBC HLA-statuses. Those that performed HLA mRNA quantification as well as the radiologists in charge of restaging were blinded to the patients’ medical histories.

The demographic data and clinical characteristics of the patients and the characteristics of their cancer are presented as frequencies and percentages and medians and ranges, as appropriate. ROC curves were analyzed and areas under the curve (AUCs), Youden J points and sensitivities and specificities were defined. All statistics were computed using R (version 3.1.2). A significance level of 5% was chosen.

Results

We enrolled 34 patients into the study. The characteristics of the patients and their MBC are outlined in Table I. The median age at BC diagnosis was 50 years while the median age at study enrollment was 60.5.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

Patient and tumor characteristics (n=34).

The most common MBC subtype (38.2%) was the luminal B subtype, while 20.6% had triple negative cancers. Almost a quarter of the patients studied had bone metastases.

The distributions of HLA-A and HLA-B/C expression are presented in Figure 1. The distributions were bimodal in both cases. A Mann-Whitney-U (MWU) test revealed that such distributions were not statistically significantly different when comparing the deceased within 5 years since study enrollment included patients surviving 5 years or longer (MWU=63.5, p=0.51 for HLA-A and MWU=69, p=0.65 for HLA-B/C).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Histograms illustrating human leukocyte antigen (HLA) expression: A) HLA-A, B) HLA-B/C. 40-ΔΔCT: Relative gene expression.

ROC curves graphically representing the diagnostic efficiency of HLA-A and HLA-B/C expression by MBC cells for 5-year survival are displayed in Figure 2. The ROC curve for HLA-B/C has the higher AUC of the two (0.42 vs. 0.55). Youden J points, specificity- and sensitivity-optimized cut-off points are represented in Table II. High levels of HLA-A and HLA-B/C expression (a 40-ΔΔCT of 33.5 and 31.9, respectively) were highly specific (87.5% and 100%, respectively) for five-year survival. The best sensitivity (73.7%) was achieved at a cut-off of 30.5 40-ΔΔCT for HLA-A.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Receiver operating characteristic curves representing the sensitivity and specificity of A) human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-A and B) HLA-B/C expression for the detection of patients likely to survive 5 years post study enrollment (only non-survivors were analyzed).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table II.

Receiver operating characteristics.

Discussion

In previous decades, it has been recognized that cellular immunity and CTLs in particular play an important role in the control of neoplastic growth (5, 6). Namely, tumor cell dedifferentiation and concomitant HLA-A, B and C repression lead to an inadequate T-cell response to such tumor cells, since these molecules are paramount for tumor antigen recognition by CTLs (9-11). However, the HLA expression process is not a binary affair and tumor cells, like normal cells, can express varying levels of HLA molecules (17). These concepts have been tested in the context of several neoplasms and BC is one of them. In our study, MBC cells were shown to express relatively high levels of HLA-A and much lower levels of HLA-B or C (Figure 1). Approximately a quarter of our patients lived for 5 years or longer after study enrollment. Sadly, all except 4 succumbed to the disease by the end of follow-up.

We find it noteworthy that high HLA-A, B or C expression by MBC cells was very specific in predicting the 5-year survival. In other words, patients whose MBCs were expressing these molecules in amounts higher than a certain cut-off value were likely to survive at least five years after starting a new line of therapy. We found the specificity of HLA-A at 33.5 40-ΔΔCT to be 87.5% and that of HLA-B/C at 31.9 40-ΔΔCT even reached 100%. It seems that HLA-B/C has a higher AUC value (0.55), while the sensitivities at these cut-off values were identical for both HLA classes (21.1%). However, no clinically useful cut-off points could be determined that would optimize sensitivity, which would help identify patients likely to die of their BC before the 5-year mark, since the highest sensitivity that could be achieved was 73.7% when using a cut-off of 30.5 40-ΔΔCT for HLA-A expression.

The highest diagnostic efficacy, i.e., the compromise between sensitivity and specificity, is represented by the ROC Youden J point cut-off values of 33.5 40-ΔΔCT for HLA-A and 31.9 40-ΔΔCT for HLA-B/C. To the best of our knowledge, no other study has thus far dealt with the topic of HLA class I molecule cut-off points in the context of predicting survival in MBC patients.

We could make no inference in regard to positive and negative predictive values because the five-year survival has never yet been statistically evaluated in a group of patients comparable to those enrolled in our study–patients with MBC with high HLA-A or HLA-B/C expression. This particular aspect warrants further studies.

We acknowledge that our study has several limitations. First and foremost, the number of patients enrolled is relatively low thus making our conclusions less reliable - 34 patients were enrolled in the study overall and only 7 patients survived to five years or longer. However, the methods applied in this study are resource-consuming, including mRNA-based determination of intrinsic tumor subtypes and HLA molecules of several classes. The applied methods require highly specialized skillsets and are associated with significant costs. Thus, this was a proof-of-concept study, and we plan to analyze a larger patient cohort in the future since determining HLA-A, B or C expression might be able to predict which patients would benefit most from expensive new-line MBC treatments. Second, not all patients with high levels of HLA-A, B or C expression by their MBC cells had favorable outcomes, so future research should be undertaken to define other predictors of such events.

Conclusion

Our proof-of-concept study supports the conclusion that high expression of certain class I HLA molecule subtypes by MBC cells can identify patients with a favorable prognosis. Our data suggest cut-off values for HLA-A and HLA-B/C expression with high specificity as a potential prognosticator of a 5-year overall survival, paired with a yet too low sensitivity based on our pilot cohort. Therefore, additional prospective follow-up studies are required.

Footnotes

  • Authors’ Contributions

    Conception and design of the study: S.S., M.W., T.M.D.; Data collection: R.W., A.S.; Data analysis & interpretation: U.K., S.S., M.S.; Statistical analysis: U.K., S.S.; Manuscript preparation phase 1 - drafting the article: S.S., U.K., T.M.D.; Manuscript preparation phase 2- revising it critically for important intellectual content: M.W., M.S., R.W., A.S.; Final approval of the version to be submitted: all Authors.

  • Conflicts of Interest

    R. W. is an employee of Stratifyer Molecular Pathology GmbH. All other Authors have nothing to disclose in relation to this study.

  • Received January 18, 2023.
  • Revision received February 1, 2023.
  • Accepted February 2, 2023.
  • Copyright © 2023 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Global Burden of Disease Cancer Collaboration,
    2. Fitzmaurice C,
    3. Akinyemiju TF,
    4. Al Lami FH,
    5. Alam T,
    6. Alizadeh-Navaei R,
    7. Allen C,
    8. Alsharif U,
    9. Alvis-Guzman N,
    10. Amini E,
    11. Anderson BO,
    12. Aremu O,
    13. Artaman A,
    14. Asgedom SW,
    15. Assadi R,
    16. Atey TM,
    17. Avila-Burgos L,
    18. Awasthi A,
    19. Ba Saleem HO,
    20. Barac A,
    21. Bennett JR,
    22. Bensenor IM,
    23. Bhakta N,
    24. Brenner H,
    25. Cahuana-Hurtado L,
    26. Castañeda-Orjuela CA,
    27. Catalá-López F,
    28. Choi JJ,
    29. Christopher DJ,
    30. Chung SC,
    31. Curado MP,
    32. Dandona L,
    33. Dandona R,
    34. das Neves J,
    35. Dey S,
    36. Dharmaratne SD,
    37. Doku DT,
    38. Driscoll TR,
    39. Dubey M,
    40. Ebrahimi H,
    41. Edessa D,
    42. El-Khatib Z,
    43. Endries AY,
    44. Fischer F,
    45. Force LM,
    46. Foreman KJ,
    47. Gebrehiwot SW,
    48. Gopalani SV,
    49. Grosso G,
    50. Gupta R,
    51. Gyawali B,
    52. Hamadeh RR,
    53. Hamidi S,
    54. Harvey J,
    55. Hassen HY,
    56. Hay RJ,
    57. Hay SI,
    58. Heibati B,
    59. Hiluf MK,
    60. Horita N,
    61. Hosgood HD,
    62. Ilesanmi OS,
    63. Innos K,
    64. Islami F,
    65. Jakovljevic MB,
    66. Johnson SC,
    67. Jonas JB,
    68. Kasaeian A,
    69. Kassa TD,
    70. Khader YS,
    71. Khan EA,
    72. Khan G,
    73. Khang YH,
    74. Khosravi MH,
    75. Khubchandani J,
    76. Kopec JA,
    77. Kumar GA,
    78. Kutz M,
    79. Lad DP,
    80. Lafranconi A,
    81. Lan Q,
    82. Legesse Y,
    83. Leigh J,
    84. Linn S,
    85. Lunevicius R,
    86. Majeed A,
    87. Malekzadeh R,
    88. Malta DC,
    89. Mantovani LG,
    90. McMahon BJ,
    91. Meier T,
    92. Melaku YA,
    93. Melku M,
    94. Memiah P,
    95. Mendoza W,
    96. Meretoja TJ,
    97. Mezgebe HB,
    98. Miller TR,
    99. Mohammed S,
    100. Mokdad AH,
    101. Moosazadeh M,
    102. Moraga P,
    103. Mousavi SM,
    104. Nangia V,
    105. Nguyen CT,
    106. Nong VM,
    107. Ogbo FA,
    108. Olagunju AT,
    109. Pa M,
    110. Park EK,
    111. Patel T,
    112. Pereira DM,
    113. Pishgar F,
    114. Postma MJ,
    115. Pourmalek F,
    116. Qorbani M,
    117. Rafay A,
    118. Rawaf S,
    119. Rawaf DL,
    120. Roshandel G,
    121. Safiri S,
    122. Salimzadeh H,
    123. Sanabria JR,
    124. Santric Milicevic MM,
    125. Sartorius B,
    126. Satpathy M,
    127. Sepanlou SG,
    128. Shackelford KA,
    129. Shaikh MA,
    130. Sharif-Alhoseini M,
    131. She J,
    132. Shin MJ,
    133. Shiue I,
    134. Shrime MG,
    135. Sinke AH,
    136. Sisay M,
    137. Sligar A,
    138. Sufiyan MB,
    139. Sykes BL,
    140. Tabarés-Seisdedos R,
    141. Tessema GA,
    142. Topor-Madry R,
    143. Tran TT,
    144. Tran BX,
    145. Ukwaja KN,
    146. Vlassov VV,
    147. Vollset SE,
    148. Weiderpass E,
    149. Williams HC,
    150. Yimer NB,
    151. Yonemoto N,
    152. Younis MZ,
    153. Murray CJL and
    154. Naghavi M
    : Global, regional, and national cancer incidence, mortality, years of life lost, years lived with disability, and disability-adjusted life-years for 29 cancer groups, 1990 to 2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease study. JAMA Oncol 4(11): 1553-1568, 2018. PMID: 29860482. DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.2706
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Holleczek B,
    2. Jansen L and
    3. Brenner H
    : Breast cancer survival in Germany: a population-based high resolution study from Saarland. PLoS One 8(7): e70680, 2013. PMID: 23936237. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0070680
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Hosford SR and
    2. Miller TW
    : Clinical potential of novel therapeutic targets in breast cancer: CDK4/6, Src, JAK/STAT, PARP, HDAC, and PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathways. Pharmgenomics Pers Med 7: 203-215, 2014. PMID: 25206307. DOI: 10.2147/PGPM.S52762
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Gennari A,
    2. Conte P,
    3. Rosso R,
    4. Orlandini C and
    5. Bruzzi P
    : Survival of metastatic breast carcinoma patients over a 20-year period: a retrospective analysis based on individual patient data from six consecutive studies. Cancer 104(8): 1742-1750, 2005. PMID: 16149088. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.21359
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Farhood B,
    2. Najafi M and
    3. Mortezaee K
    : CD8(+) cytotoxic T lymphocytes in cancer immunotherapy: A review. J Cell Physiol 234(6): 8509-8521, 2019. PMID: 30520029. DOI: 10.1002/jcp.27782
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Ali HR,
    2. Provenzano E,
    3. Dawson SJ,
    4. Blows FM,
    5. Liu B,
    6. Shah M,
    7. Earl HM,
    8. Poole CJ,
    9. Hiller L,
    10. Dunn JA,
    11. Bowden SJ,
    12. Twelves C,
    13. Bartlett JM,
    14. Mahmoud SM,
    15. Rakha E,
    16. Ellis IO,
    17. Liu S,
    18. Gao D,
    19. Nielsen TO,
    20. Pharoah PD and
    21. Caldas C
    : Association between CD8+ T-cell infiltration and breast cancer survival in 12,439 patients. Ann Oncol 25(8): 1536-1543, 2014. PMID: 24915873. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdu191
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Raskov H,
    2. Orhan A,
    3. Christensen JP and
    4. Gögenur I
    : Cytotoxic CD8(+) T cells in cancer and cancer immunotherapy. Br J Cancer 124(2): 359-367, 2021. PMID: 32929195. DOI: 10.1038/s41416-020-01048-4
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Vacca P,
    2. Munari E,
    3. Tumino N,
    4. Moretta F,
    5. Pietra G,
    6. Vitale M,
    7. Del Zotto G,
    8. Mariotti FR,
    9. Mingari MC and
    10. Moretta L
    : Human natural killer cells and other innate lymphoid cells in cancer: Friends or foes? Immunol Lett 201: 14-19, 2018. PMID: 30439479. DOI: 10.1016/j.imlet.2018.11.004
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Paulson KG,
    2. Voillet V,
    3. McAfee MS,
    4. Hunter DS,
    5. Wagener FD,
    6. Perdicchio M,
    7. Valente WJ,
    8. Koelle SJ,
    9. Church CD,
    10. Vandeven N,
    11. Thomas H,
    12. Colunga AG,
    13. Iyer JG,
    14. Yee C,
    15. Kulikauskas R,
    16. Koelle DM,
    17. Pierce RH,
    18. Bielas JH,
    19. Greenberg PD,
    20. Bhatia S,
    21. Gottardo R,
    22. Nghiem P and
    23. Chapuis AG
    : Acquired cancer resistance to combination immunotherapy from transcriptional loss of class I HLA. Nat Commun 9(1): 3868, 2018. PMID: 30250229. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-06300-3
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Burr ML,
    2. Sparbier CE,
    3. Chan KL,
    4. Chan YC,
    5. Kersbergen A,
    6. Lam EYN,
    7. Azidis-Yates E,
    8. Vassiliadis D,
    9. Bell CC,
    10. Gilan O,
    11. Jackson S,
    12. Tan L,
    13. Wong SQ,
    14. Hollizeck S,
    15. Michalak EM,
    16. Siddle HV,
    17. McCabe MT,
    18. Prinjha RK,
    19. Guerra GR,
    20. Solomon BJ,
    21. Sandhu S,
    22. Dawson SJ,
    23. Beavis PA,
    24. Tothill RW,
    25. Cullinane C,
    26. Lehner PJ,
    27. Sutherland KD and
    28. Dawson MA
    : An evolutionarily conserved function of polycomb silences the MHC class I antigen presentation pathway and enables immune evasion in cancer. Cancer Cell 36(4): 385-401.e8, 2019. PMID: 31564637. DOI: 10.1016/j.ccell.2019.08.008
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Patel SJ,
    2. Sanjana NE,
    3. Kishton RJ,
    4. Eidizadeh A,
    5. Vodnala SK,
    6. Cam M,
    7. Gartner JJ,
    8. Jia L,
    9. Steinberg SM,
    10. Yamamoto TN,
    11. Merchant AS,
    12. Mehta GU,
    13. Chichura A,
    14. Shalem O,
    15. Tran E,
    16. Eil R,
    17. Sukumar M,
    18. Guijarro EP,
    19. Day CP,
    20. Robbins P,
    21. Feldman S,
    22. Merlino G,
    23. Zhang F and
    24. Restifo NP
    : Identification of essential genes for cancer immunotherapy. Nature 548(7669): 537-542, 2017. PMID: 28783722. DOI: 10.1038/nature23477
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Kaneko K,
    2. Ishigami S,
    3. Kijima Y,
    4. Funasako Y,
    5. Hirata M,
    6. Okumura H,
    7. Shinchi H,
    8. Koriyama C,
    9. Ueno S,
    10. Yoshinaka H and
    11. Natsugoe S
    : Clinical implication of HLA class I expression in breast cancer. BMC Cancer 11: 454, 2011. PMID: 22014037. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-11-454
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Li K,
    2. Du H,
    3. Lian X,
    4. Yang S,
    5. Chai D,
    6. Wang C,
    7. Yang R and
    8. Chen X
    : Characterization of β2-microglobulin expression in different types of breast cancer. BMC Cancer 14: 750, 2014. PMID: 25292288. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-14-750
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Apps R,
    2. Gardner L and
    3. Moffett A
    : A critical look at HLA-G. Trends Immunol 29(7): 313-321, 2008. PMID: 18538632. DOI: 10.1016/j.it.2008.02.012
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Würfel FM,
    2. Wirtz RM,
    3. Winterhalter C,
    4. Taffurelli M,
    5. Santini D,
    6. Mandrioli A,
    7. Veltrup E,
    8. Rübner M,
    9. Fasching PA,
    10. Würfel W and
    11. Zamagni C
    : HLA-J, a non-pseudogene as a new prognostic marker for therapy response and survival in breast cancer. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 80(11): 1123-1133, 2020. PMID: 33173240. DOI: 10.1055/a-1128-6664
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Ecke TH,
    2. Voß PC,
    3. Schlomm T,
    4. Rabien A,
    5. Friedersdorff F,
    6. Barski D,
    7. Otto T,
    8. Waldner M,
    9. Veltrup E,
    10. Linden F,
    11. Hake R,
    12. Eidt S,
    13. Roggisch J,
    14. Heidenreich A,
    15. Rieger C,
    16. Kastner L,
    17. Hallmann S,
    18. Koch S and
    19. Wirtz RM
    : Prediction of response to cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy of muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients by molecular subtyping including KRT and FGFR target gene assessment. Int J Mol Sci 23(14): 7898, 2022. PMID: 35887247. DOI: 10.3390/ijms23147898
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Aptsiauri N and
    2. Garrido F
    : The challenges of HLA class I loss in cancer immunotherapy: Facts and hopes. Clin Cancer Res 28(23): 5021-5029, 2022. PMID: 35861868. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-3501
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research: 43 (4)
Anticancer Research
Vol. 43, Issue 4
April 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Cut-off Analysis of HLA-A and HLA-B/C Expression as a Potential Prognosticator of Favorable Survival in Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
4 + 7 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Cut-off Analysis of HLA-A and HLA-B/C Expression as a Potential Prognosticator of Favorable Survival in Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer
STEFAN STEFANOVIC, RALPH WIRTZ, MARC SÜTTERLIN, UROS KARIC, ANDREAS SCHNEEWEISS, THOMAS M. DEUTSCH, MARKUS WALLWIENER
Anticancer Research Apr 2023, 43 (4) 1449-1454; DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.16293

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Cut-off Analysis of HLA-A and HLA-B/C Expression as a Potential Prognosticator of Favorable Survival in Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer
STEFAN STEFANOVIC, RALPH WIRTZ, MARC SÜTTERLIN, UROS KARIC, ANDREAS SCHNEEWEISS, THOMAS M. DEUTSCH, MARKUS WALLWIENER
Anticancer Research Apr 2023, 43 (4) 1449-1454; DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.16293
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

  • Correlation of HLA-A and HLA-B/C Expression With PD-1 and PD-L1 Expression in Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer as a Potential Prognosticator of Favorable Survival
  • Correlation of HLA-A and HLA-B/C Expression With ESR1 Expression in Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer as a Potential Prognosticator of Favorable Distant Disease-free Survival
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Inhibition of AP-1 Reduces CD46-mediated Invasion of Bladder and Colon Cancer Cells
  • Apoptotic Induction by 1,5-Diaryl-1,4-pentadien-3-one Derivatives in the HL60 Cell Line: In Vitro and In Silico Expression
  • Evaluation of Combined Treatment With Atorvastatin and SREBP2 Inhibitors Against Colorectal Cancer Cells Under Two-dimensional and Three-dimensional Culture Models
Show more Experimental Studies

Keywords

  • breast cancer
  • HLA-A
  • HLA-B/C
  • cut-off
  • prognosticator
Anticancer Research

© 2026 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire