Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleClinical Studies
Open Access

Refined Diagnosis of Pleural Effusions by Immunocytochemistry of Cell Blocks

HIRSH KOYI and ERIK WILANDER
Anticancer Research February 2023, 43 (2) 669-673; DOI: https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.16204
HIRSH KOYI
1Department of Respiratory Medicine, Gävle Hospital, Gävle, Sweden;
2Department of Oncology–Pathology, Karolinska Biomics Center, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden;
3Centre for Research and Development, Uppsala University/County Council of Gävleborg, Gävle, Sweden;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: hirsh.koyi@regiongavleborg.se
ERIK WILANDER
4Department of Pathology, Gävle Hospital, Gävle, Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background/Aim: The main objective of microscopic examination of pleural effusions is to ascertain the presence of malignant cells. Effusions prepared routinely using May–Grünwald–Giemsa (MGG)- and Papanicolaou (PAP)-staining can, in a number of cases, provide inconclusive cytological results regarding malignancy. Patients and Methods: This report describes the refined diagnosis of such cases based on immunocytochemical analysis of pleural effusion cell blocks. Of the 340 pleural effusions obtained during 2019 at the Department of Clinical Cytology, Gävle Hospital, Sweden, 63 (18.5%) contained atypical cells of undetermined significance or potentially malignant cells. Results: This diagnosis could be refined using Epithelial Cell Adhesion Molecule/EPCAM (BEREP4) immunocytochemical analysis of effusion cell blocks, allowing previously inconclusive effusions to be classified as clearly benign 42/63 (66.7%) or malignant 21/63 (33.3%). Effusions initially diagnosed as clearly malignant (27/340; 7.9%) were all 27 (100%) BEREP4-immuno-stained. Most BEREP4-positive effusions (37/48; 77.1%) were also carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) positive. The number of BEREP4-positive cells, however, tended to exceed that of CEA-positive cells. The BEREP4 positive effusions were further examined using different monoclonal antibodies, such as Thyroid transcription factor 1 (TTF-1) for primary pulmonary adenocarcinoma, to determine the original site of the primary tumour. Conclusion: Immunohistochemical staining of pleural effusion cell blocks significantly refines the diagnosis of serous pleural effusions, especially in cases where the preliminary diagnosis was atypical cells of undetermined significance or potentially malignant cells. Furthermore, in the cases of malignancy, the origin of the primary tumour could most often be determined.

Key Words:
  • Pleural effusions
  • cell block
  • immunohistochemistry
  • malignant cells
  • BEREP4
  • CEA

Serous effusions in the pleural cavity occur for three main reasons, namely: 1) cardiac and circulatory disturbances; 2) inflammatory or infectious diseases, and 3) metastatic spread of cancer, primarily adenocarcinoma (1, 2). Circulatory disturbances often result in bilateral pleural effusions, whereas unilateral effusions are more frequent in malignant diseases. The main objective of investigating serous pleural effusions by any Department of Pathology is to identify or exclude the presence of malignant disease (1, 2).

In Sweden, pleural serous effusions that are clearly benign or non-representative tend to be examined and diagnosed solely by cyto-technicians, whereas effusions containing atypical cells of unknown significance, potentially and/or clearly malignant cells, are transferred to the Clinical Cytology department for final evaluation and diagnosis by a clinical pathologist. At the Department of Pathology in Gävle Hospital, Sweden, over 300 pleural effusions are examined annually, which is estimated to correspond to over 15,000 examinations in Sweden per year. It is evident that cytological examinations of pleural effusions represent an important, routine diagnostic tool in Clinical Cytology.

The aim of this investigation was to refine the diagnosis of serous pleural effusions using immunostaining of cell blocks, a method that can considerably increase the sensitivity and specificity of cytological examinations compared to ordinary microscopic examinations of cytological smears routinely stained with May–Grünwald–Giemsa (MGG) and Papanicolaou (PAP).

Patients and Methods

All pleural effusions diagnosed at the Department of Clinical Cytology and Pathology, County Hospital, Gävle, Sweden, during 2019 were included in this analysis. Since the methodology for the preparation, staining, and examination of pleural effusions used here corresponds to routine clinical practise, this analysis was considered to be a quality assurance study as opposed to a purely scientific investigation. Thus, it was not subjected to ethical considerations or acceptance.

A total of 340 pleural examinations were collected at the Department during 2019, 207 (60.9%) from males and 133 (39.1%) from females aged between 16◻99 years (median age 75 years). Two or more effusions were obtained in 65 (19.1%) of these individuals.

Of the total 340 pleural effusions, 250 (73.5%) were considered benign (and a few not representative) and had been diagnosed solely by cyto-technicians. The remaining effusions (90; 26.5%) were transferred to a clinical pathologist in Clinical Cytology after preliminary diagnosis by cyto-technicians that classified them as: 1) atypical cells of undetermined significance (n=42); 2) potentially malignant cells (n=21); or, 3) clearly malignant cells (n=21). Test tubes containing these pleural effusions (≥20 ml) were centrifuged (3,000 rpm for 10 minutes). The supernatant was removed and the basal precipitate in the test tube was exposed to two drops of normal human plasma (Department of Transfusion Medicine, Gävle Hospital) and two drops of thrombin (EMD Millipor Corp., Billerica, MA, USA). The precipitate was then fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin (Solveco Chemicals, Rosersberg, Sweden). The precipitate was embedded in paraffin (Sakura Finetek, Göteborg, Sweden), sectioned at 4 μm and collected on glass slides (Matsunami, Osaka, Japan). One slide per effusion precipitate was stained with haematoxylin-eosin (Histolab products AB, Askim, Sweden), and two glass slides were immune-stained with BEREP4 (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) and CEA (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) monoclonal antibodies, respectively, in a Ventana instrument (Roche) according to a protocol described by Roche to identify malignant (3, 4) and/or adenocarcinoma (5) cells in the cell block, respectively. A cover glass (Tissue tek, Sakura Finetek) was placed on each stained section. Extra slides were prepared for potential analysis with additional immuno-stains.

In cases where malignant cells had been identified, additional antibodies were employed to identify the location of the primary malignancy, such as TTF-1 antibodies (Roche) for lung carcinoma (6); synaptophysin antibodies (Roche) for small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC); Caudal Type Homeobox 2 CDX-2 (Roche) and Cytokeratin 20 (Roche) antibodies for intestinal carcinoma; and, GATA-3 and oestrogen-receptor (ER), and Wilms tumour protein 1 (WT1) and PAX8 antibodies for breast and ovarian carcinoma, respectively (7-11). Immuno-stained slides were placed in a scanning microscope (Hamamatsu Nano Zoomer, S260 ×400) to obtain digital images of the cell blocks, which were examined and diagnosed by a clinical pathologist in Clinical Cytology on a data screen.

Results

A total of 90 pleural effusions examined by a clinical pathologist for diagnosis originated from 45 (50%) females and 45 (50%) males. The results following immunohistochemical analysis of the cell blocks using BEREP4 are shown in Table I and Figure 1. In all 27 effusions confirmed to contain malignant cells, BEREP4-immunoreactive cells were observed, corresponding to 100%. Pleural effusions with atypical cells of undetermined significance were BEREP4-positive in 19.0% (8/42) of cases and effusions containing potentially malignant cells were BEREP4-positive in 58.9% (13/21) of cases. Thus, in all 63 (18.5%) cases of pleural effusions containing atypical cells of undetermined significance or potentially malignant cells, BEREP4 immunostaining was discriminatory, thereby allowing classification of these effusions as clearly benign or malignant.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

Correlation between the preliminary diagnosis of serous pleural effusions determined by cyto-technicians after light microscopy of MGG- and PAP-stained smears, and the diagnosis made by clinical pathologists following BEREP4-antibody staining of cell blocks.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Pleural effusion from a male with primary non-small cell carcinoma (NSCC). The tumour cells are (A) BEREP4-positive, (B) CEA- positive, and (C) TTF-1-positive, but cytokeratin 20-negative (D).

Although the sex distribution of effusions examined with BEREP4 antibodies was equal (45/45), BEREP4-positive effusions were more common in females, 73.3% (33/45), compared to males, 33.3% (15/45) (p<0.000). One reason for this discrepancy may be that effusions are more commonly collected in males with diseases not related to malignancy and that pleural effusion is often the first symptom of women with ovarian malignancies. The BEREP4 immunostaining also confirmed the initial diagnosis of clearly malignant cells in an additional 21 (6.2%) of effusions. In total, 14.1% (48/340) of the effusions were found to contain malignant cells after a refined diagnosis by BEREP4 immunostaining of the cell blocks.

The BEREP4 staining was performed in conjunction with CEA staining in all 90 effusions considered as not clearly benign by the cyto-technicians. In BEREP4-positive cases, the correlation between CEA immunoreactivity and sex is shown in Table II. Most (77.1%; 37/48) BEREP4-positive effusions were also CEA positive; the number of BEREP4-positive cells, however, tended to exceed that of CEA-positive cells. This observation was mainly obvious in females with pleural metastases of ovarian carcinoma in which the CEA staining was weak or sometimes negative. The proportion of CEA-positive effusions did not show any obvious sex differences (76.4% and 78.6% in females and males, respectively). In most cases, the origin of the primary tumour site could be identified either by adding additional, topography-specific antibodies (e.g., TTF-1 for lung adenocarcinoma; CDX-2 for lower intestinal adenocarcinoma; ER for gynaecological cancer; and synaptophysin for neuroendocrine tumours, such as SCLC) to the cell block or by analysis of corresponding patient medical records. Cell blocks were also used for quantitative analyses of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) immuno-reactivity in effusions containing primary lung adenocarcinoma cells, information which was of clinical importance and used to determine choice of therapy. Although cells from malignant lymphomas and mesotheliomas are also reported to occur in pleural effusions (12-16), this was not observed in the present study.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table II.

Correlation between carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) immunoreactivity and sex in 48 BEREP4-immunoreactive cell blocks.

Discussion

In this investigation comprising a total of 340 pleural effusions, the use of BEREP4 immunohistochemistry on cell blocks of serous pleural effusions clearly enabled a refined diagnosis on benign/metastatic status compared to methodology based solely on routine MGG-stained smears. In 63 (18.5%) of cases with atypical cells of undetermined significance or potentially malignant cells, BEREP4 immunostaining was discriminatory in 100% of cases, and allowed the classification of these effusions as clearly benign or malignant, as reported previously (3, 4, 12, 13).

The BEREP4 antigen is a general marker for epithelial cells and malignant epithelial tumours, such as squamous carcinoma and adenocarcinoma, as shown in this study. The BEREP4 antibody has been used to discriminate mesotheliomas from metastatic cancer but can also be employed to identify malignant cells of epithelial origin in pleural effusions containing cells of undetermined significance or potentially malignant cells (3, 4, 12-14). In contrast, the CEA antigen is considered to be a general marker for the identification of adenocarcinoma cells (5). In this study, BEREP4-positive effusions were more common in females, 73.3% (33/45), compared to males, 33.3% (15/45). One reason for this discrepancy may be that effusions are more commonly collected in males with diseases not related to malignancy and that pleural effusion is often the first symptom of women with ovarian malignancies. However, some types of adenocarcinomas are either CEA-negative or infrequently immuno-stained, such as breast adenocarcinoma and ovarian adenocarcinoma. In this investigation, pleural effusions with malignant cells of unknown origin were shown to be metastases of ovarian carcinoma after application of ER, WT1, and PAX8 antibodies, and subsequently verified by the clinical examination (7, 10, 11).

Two primary goals exist for the examination of pleural effusions for diagnosis, namely: 1) to clarify whether malignant cells are present or not; and 2) to identify the primary, topographical tumour site when an effusion with malignant cells of unknown origin is observed. Often, the presence of a malignant tumour is already known, in which case the demonstration of malignant pleural effusions has clinical implications for choice of further anti-tumour treatment. Not infrequently, however, a pleural effusion with malignant cells is often the first indication of a malignant disease. For instance, the initial manifestation of a malignant condition is the occurrence of pleural metastases derived from a serous ovarian cancer. In such cases, using more specific antibodies (e.g., ER, WT1 and PAX8) can provide conclusive information on the topographical site of the primary tumour.

Refined diagnosis of pleural effusions has further implications. Cell blocks containing malignant cells of defined types of carcinomas can be sent to molecular pathology laboratories for molecular determination of the different types of DNA abnormalities fundamental to determining relevant anti-tumour therapy. They can also be employed for more selective immuno-staining. Sections from such blocks can be stained with PD-L1 antibodies, which provide quantitative data based on comparing the number of BEREP4- versus PD-L1-positive cells in the immuno-stained sections. Such information may be of critical value when evaluating optimal therapeutic strategies in primary lung adenocarcinoma patients (17).

In conclusion, immunohistochemical staining of cell blocks with BEREP4 antibodies can significantly refine the diagnosis of pleural effusions, especially in cases where preliminary diagnosis of effusions with atypical cells is of undetermined significance or a potential malignancy. Moreover, by extending the examination using more site-specific antibodies, the origin of the primary tumour can be identified in most cases.

Footnotes

  • Authors’ Contributions

    The Authors equally contributed to all aspects of this study.

  • Conflicts of Interest

    The Authors report no conflicts of interest in relation to this study.

  • Received September 26, 2022.
  • Revision received December 15, 2022.
  • Accepted December 20, 2022.
  • Copyright © 2023 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.

This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 international license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0).

References

  1. ↵
    1. Thomas JM and
    2. Musani AI
    : Malignant pleural effusions: a review. Clin Chest Med 34(3): 459-471, 2013. PMID: 23993817. DOI: 10.1016/j.ccm.2013.05.004
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Ferreiro L,
    2. Lado-Baleato Ó,
    3. Toubes ME,
    4. Suárez-Antelo J,
    5. Pose-Reino A,
    6. San José ME,
    7. Álvarez-Dobaño JM,
    8. González-Barcala FJ,
    9. Ricoy J,
    10. Gude F and
    11. Valdés L
    : Identification of pleural response patterns: a cluster analysis. Arch Bronconeumol (Engl Ed) 56(7): 426-434, 2020. PMID: 31759846. DOI: 10.1016/j.arbres.2019.08.021
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Went PT,
    2. Lugli A,
    3. Meier S,
    4. Bundi M,
    5. Mirlacher M,
    6. Sauter G and
    7. Dirnhofer S
    : Frequent EpCam protein expression in human carcinomas. Hum Pathol 35(1): 122-128, 2004. PMID: 14745734. DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2003.08.026
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Spizzo G,
    2. Fong D,
    3. Wurm M,
    4. Ensinger C,
    5. Obrist P,
    6. Hofer C,
    7. Mazzoleni G,
    8. Gastl G and
    9. Went P
    : EpCAM expression in primary tumour tissues and metastases: an immunohistochemical analysis. J Clin Pathol 64(5): 415-420, 2011. PMID: 21415054. DOI: 10.1136/jcp.2011.090274
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. Hammarström S
    : The carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) family: structures, suggested functions and expression in normal and malignant tissues. Semin Cancer Biol 9(2): 67-81, 1999. PMID: 10202129. DOI: 10.1006/scbi.1998.0119
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. El Hag M,
    2. Schmidt L,
    3. Roh M and
    4. Michael CW
    : Utility of TTF-1 and Napsin-A in the work-up of malignant effusions. Diagn Cytopathol 44(4): 299-304, 2016. PMID: 26799356. DOI: 10.1002/dc.23442
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Goldstein NS,
    2. Bassi D and
    3. Uzieblo A
    : WT1 is an integral component of an antibody panel to distinguish pancreaticobiliary and some ovarian epithelial neoplasms. Am J Clin Pathol 116(2): 246-252, 2001. PMID: 11488072. DOI: 10.1309/8X4T-35B7-7529-QE7X
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Lew M,
    2. Pang JC,
    3. Jing X,
    4. Fields KL and
    5. Roh MH
    : Young investigator challenge: The utility of GATA3 immunohistochemistry in the evaluation of metastatic breast carcinomas in malignant effusions. Cancer Cytopathol 123(10): 576-581, 2015. PMID: 26465236. DOI: 10.1002/cncy.21574
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Shield PW,
    2. Papadimos DJ and
    3. Walsh MD
    : GATA3: a promising marker for metastatic breast carcinoma in serous effusion specimens. Cancer Cytopathol 122(4): 307-312, 2014. PMID: 24421220. DOI: 10.1002/cncy.21393
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Sallum LF,
    2. Andrade L,
    3. Ramalho S,
    4. Ferracini AC,
    5. de Andrade Natal R,
    6. Brito ABC,
    7. Sarian LO and
    8. Derchain S
    : WT1, p53 and p16 expression in the diagnosis of low- and high-grade serous ovarian carcinomas and their relation to prognosis. Oncotarget 9(22): 15818-15827, 2018. PMID: 29662608. DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.24530
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Chapel DB,
    2. Husain AN,
    3. Krausz T and
    4. McGregor SM
    : PAX8 expression in a subset of malignant peritoneal mesotheliomas and benign mesothelium has diagnostic implications in the differential diagnosis of ovarian serous carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 41(12): 1675-1682, 2017. PMID: 28877056. DOI: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000935
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Gaffey MJ,
    2. Mills SE,
    3. Swanson PE,
    4. Zarbo RJ,
    5. Shah AR and
    6. Wick MR
    : Immunoreactivity for BER-EP4 in adenocarcinomas, adenomatoid tumors, and malignant mesotheliomas. Am J Surg Pathol 16(6): 593-599, 1992. PMID: 1599037. DOI: 10.1097/00000478-199206000-00007
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Szczepulska-Wójcik E,
    2. Langfort R and
    3. Roszkowski-Sliz K
    : A comparative evaluation of immunohistochemical markers for the differential diagnosis between malignant mesothelioma, non-small cell carcinoma involving the pleura, and benign reactive mesothelial cell proliferation. Pneumonol Alergol Pol 75(1): 57-69, 2007. PMID: 17541913.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. King JE,
    2. Thatcher N,
    3. Pickering CA and
    4. Hasleton PS
    : Sensitivity and specificity of immunohistochemical markers used in the diagnosis of epithelioid mesothelioma: a detailed systematic analysis using published data. Histopathology 48(3): 223-232, 2006. PMID: 16430468. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2005.02331.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Alexandrakis MG,
    2. Passam FH,
    3. Kyriakou DS and
    4. Bouros D
    : Pleural effusions in hematologic malignancies. Chest 125(4): 1546-1555, 2004. PMID: 15078773. DOI: 10.1378/chest.125.4.1546
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Vega F,
    2. Padula A,
    3. Valbuena JR,
    4. Stancu M,
    5. Jones D and
    6. Medeiros LJ
    : Lymphomas involving the pleura: a clinicopathologic study of 34 cases diagnosed by pleural biopsy. Arch Pathol Lab Med 130(10): 1497-1502, 2006. PMID: 17090191. DOI: 10.5858/2006-130-1497-LITPAC
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Chen R,
    2. Tao Y,
    3. Xu X,
    4. Shan L,
    5. Jiang H,
    6. Yin Q,
    7. Pei L,
    8. Cai F,
    9. Ma L and
    10. Yu Y
    : The efficacy and safety of nivolumab, pembrolizumab, and atezolizumab in treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Discov Med 26(143): 155-166, 2018. PMID: 30586539.
    OpenUrlPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research: 43 (2)
Anticancer Research
Vol. 43, Issue 2
February 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Refined Diagnosis of Pleural Effusions by Immunocytochemistry of Cell Blocks
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Refined Diagnosis of Pleural Effusions by Immunocytochemistry of Cell Blocks
HIRSH KOYI, ERIK WILANDER
Anticancer Research Feb 2023, 43 (2) 669-673; DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.16204

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Refined Diagnosis of Pleural Effusions by Immunocytochemistry of Cell Blocks
HIRSH KOYI, ERIK WILANDER
Anticancer Research Feb 2023, 43 (2) 669-673; DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.16204
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Patients and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Pelvic Recurrence After Curative Resection for Rectal Adenocarcinoma: Impact of Surgery on Survival
  • Glasgow Prognostic Score Predicts Survival and Recurrence Pattern in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Hepatectomy
  • Small Bowel Lipomatosis: An Unusual Radiological Finding in Patients With Renal Cell Cancer on Pazopanib
Show more Clinical Studies

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Pleural effusions
  • cell block
  • immunohistochemistry
  • malignant cells
  • BEREP4
  • CEA
Anticancer Research

© 2023 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire