Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleExperimental Studies

Genetic and Transcriptional Analysis of 8q24.21 Cluster in Gastric Cancer

BRUNNO SANTOS PEREIRA, FERNANDA WISNIESKI, DANIELLE QUEIROZ CALCAGNO, LEONARDO CAIRES SANTOS, CAROLINA OLIVEIRA GIGEK, ELIZABETH SUCHI CHEN, LUCAS TREVIZANI RASMUSSEN, SPENCER LUIZ MARQUES PAYÃO, RENATA SANCHES ALMEIDA, CAMILA ALBUQUERQUE PINTO, BRUNO TAKAO REAL KARIA, RICARDO ARTIGIANI, SAMIA DEMACHKI, PAULO PIMENTEL ASSUMPÇÃO, LAERCIO GOMES LOURENÇO, CARLOS HARUO ARASAKI, ROMMEL RODRÍGUEZ BURBANO, MARIANA FERREIRA LEAL and MARILIA ARRUDA CARDOSO SMITH
Anticancer Research September 2022, 42 (9) 4381-4394; DOI: https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.15938
BRUNNO SANTOS PEREIRA
1Discipline of Genetics, Department of Morphology and Genetics, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
FERNANDA WISNIESKI
1Discipline of Genetics, Department of Morphology and Genetics, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil;
2Discipline of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DANIELLE QUEIROZ CALCAGNO
3Postgraduate Program in Oncology and Medical Sciences, Federal University of Pará, Belém, Brazil;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
LEONARDO CAIRES SANTOS
1Discipline of Genetics, Department of Morphology and Genetics, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
CAROLINA OLIVEIRA GIGEK
1Discipline of Genetics, Department of Morphology and Genetics, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil;
4Department of Pathology, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
ELIZABETH SUCHI CHEN
1Discipline of Genetics, Department of Morphology and Genetics, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
LUCAS TREVIZANI RASMUSSEN
5Discipline of Genetics, Blood Center of the university of Medicine of Marília, São Paulo, Brazil;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
SPENCER LUIZ MARQUES PAYÃO
5Discipline of Genetics, Blood Center of the university of Medicine of Marília, São Paulo, Brazil;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
RENATA SANCHES ALMEIDA
1Discipline of Genetics, Department of Morphology and Genetics, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
CAMILA ALBUQUERQUE PINTO
1Discipline of Genetics, Department of Morphology and Genetics, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
BRUNO TAKAO REAL KARIA
1Discipline of Genetics, Department of Morphology and Genetics, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
RICARDO ARTIGIANI
4Department of Pathology, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
SAMIA DEMACHKI
3Postgraduate Program in Oncology and Medical Sciences, Federal University of Pará, Belém, Brazil;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
PAULO PIMENTEL ASSUMPÇÃO
3Postgraduate Program in Oncology and Medical Sciences, Federal University of Pará, Belém, Brazil;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
LAERCIO GOMES LOURENÇO
6Discipline of Surgical Gastroenterology, Department of Surgery, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
CARLOS HARUO ARASAKI
6Discipline of Surgical Gastroenterology, Department of Surgery, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
ROMMEL RODRÍGUEZ BURBANO
3Postgraduate Program in Oncology and Medical Sciences, Federal University of Pará, Belém, Brazil;
7Laboratório de Biologia Molecular, Hospital Ophir Loyola, Belém, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MARIANA FERREIRA LEAL
1Discipline of Genetics, Department of Morphology and Genetics, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil;
3Postgraduate Program in Oncology and Medical Sciences, Federal University of Pará, Belém, Brazil;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MARILIA ARRUDA CARDOSO SMITH
1Discipline of Genetics, Department of Morphology and Genetics, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: macsmith{at}unifesp.br
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background/Aim: Previous studies from our research group have shown that trisomy 8 and the amplification of the 8q24.21 region is very frequent in gastric cancer (GC). Little is known about the role of most genes located in this region. Thus, the aim of this study was to understand the possible impact of transcriptional alterations and copy number variation (CNV) of four genes located in the 8q24.21 region – FAM49B, FAM84B, GSDMC and miR-5194 – in GC. Materials and Methods: Fifty-one to 85 matched pairs of tumoral and adjacent non-tumoral gastric tissues, from patients with primary GC, were used to analyze gene expression and CNV of the selected genes. We also included 29 H. pylori negative and gastritis negative gastric mucosa tissues from individuals without cancer obtained by endoscopy, as control samples. Results: The expression of FAM49B, GSDMC and miR-5194 was higher in both tumoral and adjacent non-tumoral samples compared to the negative control. The expression of FAM84B showed no significant difference between tumoral samples and negative controls. However, the expression of FAM84B in the adjacent non-tumoral samples was higher compared to negative control and tumoral samples. Moreover, the higher expression of GSDMC was associated with T3 and T4 tumors, with tumors on stage III and IV and with advanced tumors. Higher copy numbers of FAM49B and GSDMC were associated with intestinal tumor type and with moderately or well-differentiated tumors. Higher copy number of FAM84B was associated with moderately or well-differentiated tumors. Furthermore, the expression of all four genes was positively correlated. Conclusion: All four genes are upregulated in GC and may play an important role in these neoplasms. GSDMC expression was associated with more aggressive tumors.

Key Words:
  • Gastric cancer
  • gene expression
  • CNV
  • 8q24.21

Although incidence and mortality of gastric cancer (GC) have been globally decreasing in the last decades, it remains the fifth most common neoplasm and the fourth cause of cancer-related death worldwide (1). GC cause is multifactorial and it is strongly associated with Helicobacter pylori infection (2-5). Approximately 80% of the patients with GC are diagnosed in the advanced stages of this neoplasia due to the absence of specific symptoms in the early stages. Also, due to the late diagnosis, the average 5-years survival rate is less than 20%, emphasizing the urgency of new strategies for early diagnosis. Only a few countries, like Japan, adopt extensive programs for detecting early GC (6).

Trisomy 8 is one of the most common aneuploidies in GC primary tumors and GC cell lines (7-12) and mostly involves the amplification of 8q24 locus (13, 14). The 8q24.21 locus harbors genes related to cancer development process and bad GC prognosis, like the proto-oncogene MYC (8, 9, 13-19). Besides MYC, the 8q24.21 locus harbors 6 protein-coding genes and 19 non-coding genes, including 6 microRNAs and 13 long non-coding RNAs, but there are few studies examining these genes.

Therefore, based on the current literature, our group selected four genes located at 8q24.21 to be analyzed in GC. Three are protein-coding: Family with sequence similarity 49 member B (FAM49B), also known as CYRI; Family with sequence similarity 84 member B (FAM84B) and Gasdermin C (GSDMC), and one microRNA, miR-5194. To our knowledge, there are a few studies associating FAM49B (20), FAM84B (21-23) and GSDMC (24, 25) with GC, while there is no study associating miR-5194 with GC. Thus, the objective of this study was to analyze the RNA expression of FAM49B, FAM84B, GSDMC and miR-5194, as well as the copy number variation (CNV) of the former 3 genes.

Materials and Methods

Subjects and sampling. Depending on the gene studied, 51 to 85 matched pairs of tumoral and adjacent non-tumoral gastric tissues were obtained from patients with primary gastric adenocarcinoma who underwent gastric resection at Hospital São Paulo (HSP) and Hospital Universitário João de Barros Barreto (HUJBB). None of the patients had any history of exposure to either chemotherapy or radiotherapy prior to surgery, or other co-occurrence of diagnosed cancers. Samples were classified according to the Lauren classification; these data may be found in Table I. Furthermore, we included 29 H. pylori negative and gastritis negative gastric mucosa tissues as control samples; these were from individuals without cancer who underwent routine endoscopy at Centro de Gastroenterologia da Faculdade de Medicina de Marília (FAMEMA).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table I.

Associations between clinicopathological features with FAM49B. FAM84B. GSDMC and miR-5194 expression.

H. pylori presence was detected by PCR for amplification of the 150 bp fragment, referring to the 16S subunit fragment of bacterial rRNA, according to the methodology realized by our research group. Sequence of the s1/m1 allele of the VacA gene, of the 60190 strain of H. pylori (GeneBank access n°. U05676). Sequence of the s2/m2 allele of the VacA gene, of the Tx30a strain of H. pylori (GeneBank access n°. U29401) (26). The oligonucleotides Cag1 (ATGACTAACGAAACTA TTGATC) and Cag2 (CAGGATTTTTGATCGCTTTATT) were used for detection of CagA gene (27).

Written informed consent with the approval of the ethics committee of HSP and HUJBB was obtained from all patients before and after surgery (CAAE 32833514.9.1001.5505).

All procedures of the research project (CAAE 32833514.9. 1001.5505) followed the ethical standards of the Ethics Committee of Hospital São Paulo, Federal University of São Paulo – UNIFESP, according to the Code of Ethics of the World Medical Association (Declaration of Helsinki) for experiments involving humans. All invited patients and their legal representatives agreed to participate on the research and signed the Informed Consent Form before the evaluation.

DNA, RNA extraction and cDNA synthesis. Total DNA and RNA were extracted from frozen gastric tissue using the AllPrep DNA/RNA/miRNA kit (Qiagen, Hilden, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The quality and concentration of the DNA and RNA were measured using NanoDrop ND-1000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The complementary DNA (cDNA) was synthetized using High-Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription (Thermo Fisher Scientific), according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). Gene expression detection and quantification was carried out using TaqMan assays-on-demand probes (Thermo Fisher Scientific) on the Viia 7 real-time PCR system (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Each qPCR was performed in triplicate. For gene expression standardization we used GAPDH+B2M, as determined by our research group (28). Gene expression analysis was performed with values of ΔCrt and ΔΔCrt, which have inverse relationships to the transcriptional levels of each gene. The Crt method sets a threshold for each curve individually based on their shape, unlike the Ct method, that considers all the curves for a specific target to determine the threshold (29, 30).

Copy number variation analysis. Copy number variation analysis was realized using TaqMan assays-on-demand probes (Thermo Fisher Scientific). All the qPCR reactions were performed in quadruplicates using genomic DNA (gDNA) from GC tissue on the Viia 7 real-time PCR system. As internal control, we analyzed the copy numbers of the RNAse P gene (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The human gDNA G1471 and G1521 (Promega) were used for calibration. The CopyCaller software (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA) was used to predict the copy number of each gDNA sample, according to software instructions.

Statistical analysis. Statistics were performed using Jamovi version 2.2 (31). The statistical power of the tests was calculated by post hoc analysis using GPower 3.1. The data were first analyzed for their distribution using the Shapiro-Wilk test. The data didn’t follow a normal distribution and were thus analyzed by non-parametric tests. The Wilcoxon test was used to compare the gene expression between tumoral and adjacent non-tumoral samples. Mann-Whitney U-test was used to associate gene expression with patients’ clinicopathological features. The Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to associate the CNV of each gene with their gene expression. The chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test were used to associate the CNV with the clinicopathological characteristics. The Spearman correlation test was used to correlate the gene expression of each gene in tumoral gastric tissue. Cox Regression was used for survival analysis, model metric designed by Jamovi project (32-35). All confidence intervals were set at the 95% level.

Results

Gene expression in GC and controls. The expression of FAM49B, FAM84B and miR-5194 was higher in the adjacent non-tumoral samples compared to the gastric tumoral samples (Z=−2.304, p=0.021; Z=−4.176, p<0.001; Z=−3.922, p<0.001, respectively). On the other hand, the expression of GSDMC was higher in the gastric tumoral samples when compared to the adjacent non-tumoral samples (Z=−2.213, p=0.027). Furthermore, we observed that, in both tumoral and adjacent non-tumoral samples, the expression of FAM49B (U=252 and 158, respectively, p<0.001 for both comparisons), GSDMC (U=82.5 and 212, respectively, p<0.001 for both comparisons) and miR-5194 (U=652 and 393, respectively, p<0.001 for both comparisons) was higher compared to the control samples. However, we observed a significant increase of FAM84B expression only in the adjacent non-tumoral samples compared to controls (U=379, p<0.001; Figure 1).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Analysis of FAM49B, FAM84B, GSDMC and miR-5194 gene expression. (a) Expression of FAM49B in 85 pairs of tumoral and adjacent non-tumoral gastric samples and 29 gastric control samples. (b) Expression of FAM84B in 51 pairs of tumoral and adjacent non-tumoral gastric samples and 29 gastric control samples. (c) Expression of GSDMC in 52 pairs of tumoral and adjacent non-tumoral gastric samples and 26 gastric control samples. (d) Expression of miR-5194 in 77 pairs of tumoral and adjacent non-tumoral gastric samples and 29 gastric control samples. Data are expressed as median±95% confidence interval. *p<0.05 by Mann-Whitney test. **p<0.05 by Wilcoxon test.

Gene expression, survival analysis and correlations in GC. The COX Regression for survival analysis showed no increased hazard between high or low expression of FAM49B, FAM84B, GSDMC and miR-5194. These data may be found in Figure 2.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Survival analysis. (a) Survival analysis of GC patients with high (N=27) and low (N=25) expression of FAM49B. (b) Survival analysis of GC patients with high (N=16) and low (N=10) expression of FAM84B. (c) Survival analysis of GC patients with high (N=8) and low (N=22) expression of GSDMC. (d) Survival analysis of GC patients with high (N=20) and low (N=26) expression of miR-5194. Data are expressed as 2−ΔCRT.

Our results showed that the transcriptional levels of FAM49B, FAM84B, GSDMC and miR-5194 are positively correlated to each other in tumoral gastric samples, except between FAM84B and GSDMC (Table II).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table II.

Correlation between the transcriptional levels of FAM49B, FAM84B, GSDMC and miR-5194 in tumoral gastric samples.

Gene expression and clinicopathological associations. Increased expression of GSDMC in tumoral gastric samples was associated with more invasive tumors (U=201, p=0.043), with tumors in stage III and IV (U=217, p=0.044) and with advanced tumors (U=118, p=0.033) (Figure 3). The transcriptional levels of FAM49B, FAM84B and miR-5194 in gastric tumoral samples were not significatively associated with any clinicopathological feature. All the clinicopathological data may be found in Table I.

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

Analysis of gene expression and clinicopathological associations. (a) Association of higher GSDMC transcriptional levels with tumors T3 and T4 (N=34) compared to tumors T1 and T2 (N=18). (b) Association of higher GSDMC transcriptional levels with tumors on stage III and IV (N=21) compared to tumors on stage I and II (N=31). (c) Association of higher GSDMC transcriptional levels with advanced tumors (N=42) compared to early tumors (N=10). Data are expressed as median±95% confidence interval. *p<0.05 by Mann-Whitney test.

Copy number variation and clinicopathological associations. The CNV of FAM49B, FAM84B and GSDMC was not significatively associated with the respective gene expression, but the increase of FAM49B and GSDMC copy number was associated with intestinal type tumors (χ2=10.2, p=0.001 and χ2=5.86, p=0.05, respectively). Moreover, the increase of FAM49B, FAM84B and GSDMC copy number was associated with well or moderately differentiated tumors (χ2=14, p<0.001; χ2=7.82, p=0.005 and χ2=8.37, p=0.015, respectively) (Figure 4). The study of miR-5194 CNV was not performed because this gene is located in a homologous region to FAM49B, therefore, the amplification of the region of interest would be nonspecific to miR-5194. All the CNV and clinicopathological data may be found in Table III.

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

Analysis of copy number variation and clinicopathological associations. (a) Association of increased FAM49B copy number with intestinal type tumors (N=82). (b) Association of increased FAM49B copy number with well/moderately differentiated tumors (N=81). (c) Association of increased FAM84B copy number with well/moderately differentiated tumors (N=49). (d) Association of increased GSDMC copy number with intestinal type tumors (N=50). (e) Association of increased GSDMC copy number with well/moderately differentiated tumors (N=50). Data are expressed as % of samples. *p≤0.05 by Chi-squared test.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table III.

Associations between clinicopathological features with FAM49B, FAM84B and GSDMC copy number.

Discussion

The 8q24.21 region is known as a “gene desert” as there is a lack of protein-coding genes. In addition, it is frequently altered in several different tumors, being responsible for the susceptibility to cancers mainly by the amplification of the proto-oncogene MYC, as previously observed by our group (36-41). Thus, we selected three protein-coding genes and one microRNA to analyze their transcriptional levels and CNV in gastric cancer: FAM49B, FAM84B, GSDMC and miR-5194.

FAM49B acts on cytoskeletal remodeling, which leads to bacterial protection, T cell activation and mitochondrial regulation (42-46). In this study we found an overexpression of FAM49B and increased copy numbers in GC samples, suggesting that this gene may be an oncogene in GC, similarly to breast and gallbladder cancer (47, 48). Conversely, this gene has been described as a tumor suppressor in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (42). In the literature, FAM84B was associated with the progression of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, glioma, prostate and breast cancers (23, 49-53). Moreover, the long non-coding RNA FAM84-AS promotes resistance to platinum drugs in GC (22), suggesting that FAM84B acts as an oncogene in these neoplasms. As in the literature, our results showed that FAM84B may also be an oncogene in GC. MiR-5194 has been reported to be downregulated in colorectal cancer and glioblastoma (54, 55), but we found miR-5194 upregulated in GC samples. The expression levels of miR-5194 in GC were unknown until this study and its role is still unclear. This microRNA may be part of the network between MYC oncogene and microRNAs in GC, leading to the development and progression of this neoplasm (56).

Interestingly, the expression of FAM49B, FAM84B and MIR5194 was higher in the adjacent non-tumoral samples when compared to tumoral samples; this result showed that the adjacent tissue, despite not showing macroscopic signs of neoplasia, carries significant genetic alterations. This may be evidence that FAM49B, FAM84B and MIR5194 play more significant roles in the beginning of the carcinogenesis process than in tumor maintenance.

In the literature, Saeki et al. reported that GSDM is mainly expressed in the epithelium of gastric tissues. Also, although GSDM gene is amplified in GC cells, its transcriptional levels are suppressed (57, 58). Moreover, the GSDMC gene is reported as an oncogene in lung, colorectal, serous ovarian, kidney and intestinal type gastric cancer, but not in diffuse type GC (24, 59-62). In this study, we showed that GSDMC is overexpressed in GC regardless of the histological type, and it may also be an oncogene in GC. Interestingly, GSDMC is a member of the gasdermins family, which induces inflammation-mediated programmed cell death (pyroptosis). Thus, it would be expected to have an anti-tumor action, but only a few studies have associated the expression of this gene with a suppressive activity (25, 63, 64). Yang et al. reported that GSDMC is upregulated in GC tissues but it is associated to better prognosis due the role of pyroptosis (25).

GSDMC proved to be the most promising of the four studied genes in this study. Unlike the other three genes, GSDMC showed a higher expression in tumoral samples compared to adjacent non-tumoral samples. Furthermore, this gene showed a higher expression in both tumoral and adjacent non-tumoral samples compared to control samples. This result indicates that this gene may play important roles both in the beginning of the carcinogenesis process and in tumor maintenance. Moreover, the expression of GSDMC was significantly higher in more invasive, advanced and in stage III and IV tumors, emphasizing the importance of more detailed studies about this gene in GC. The results of all the clinicopathological analyses may be seen in Table I.

We also sought to elucidate the deregulation of FAM49B, FAM84B and GSDMC by analyzing their copy number. But the results of this CNV study did not show an effect of the copy number on the transcriptional levels of each gene. Therefore, the mechanism that causes the alteration of the expression of these genes still needs to be better studied and understood. As the 8q24.21 region is a “gene desert”, it carries several long non-coding RNAs and microRNAs that are frequently altered in cancer and play roles from transcription to translation (65), so this could be the mechanism by which the genes in this region are deregulated. Another possibility is that there is an association among MYC and the genes in 8q24.21, as reported with FAM84B (23).

Besides that, the increase in FAM49B, FAM84B and GSDMC copy number was associated with intestinal type and moderately/well differentiated tumors, which are complementary results, since one of the main features of the intestinal type tumors is to present a higher cellular differentiation compared to diffuse type GC (66).

The genes FAM49B, FAM84B, GSDMC and miR-5194 are genetically linked, and their expression in tumoral samples were positively correlated. These data reinforce the study of Du et al. (67), which shows the region 8q24 as a regulatory hub of genes that interacts with each other and with multiple genomic loci across the genome in a prostate cancer cell line.

Conclusion

According to our results, we can conclude that FAM49B, FAM84B, GSDMC and miR-5194 are upregulated in GC. Therefore, these transcripts are potential diagnostic biomarkers in GC.

Trisomy 8 is often found in primary GC and GC cell lines, with the amplification of 8q24 locus being the most frequent. Our results confirmed these data. FAM49B, FAM84B and GSDMC have alterations in their copy number. In addition, their increased copy number is associated with intestinal type and moderately or well differentiated tumors.

Finally, GSDMC seems to have a more relevant impact on GC progression, since its expression is associated with more aggressive cancers, i.e., advanced and more invasive tumors.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES), Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) and Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP) for the financial support and fellowships. We would also like to thank the staff of the Hospital São Paulo (HSP), Hospital Universitario João de Barros Barreto (HUJBB) and Centro de Gastroenterologia da Faculdade de Medicina de Marília (FAMEMA) for their contribution with the sample collection. This study was supported by the Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP, Process n° 2016/25562-0 to MACS) and the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq; to MACS).

Footnotes

  • Authors’ Contributions

    Conceptualization: Marília Arruda Cardoso Smith, Fernanda Wisniesk; writing-original draft preparation: Brunno dos Santos Pereira; writing: Brunno dos Santos Pereira; review and editing: Marília Arruda Cardoso Smith, Fernanda Wisniesk and Bruno Takao Real Karia; sample collection: Brunno dos Santos Pereira, Leonardo Caires dos Santos, Fernanda Wisniesk, Renata Sanches Almeida, Camila Albuquerque Pinto, Elizabeth Suchi Chen, Rommel Rodríguez Burbano; bench work: Brunno dos Santos Pereira, Camila Albuquerque Pinto, Renata Sanches Almeida; statistical analysis: Brunno dos Santos Pereira and Fernanda Wisniesk; surgery: Paulo Pimentel Assumpção, Carlos Haruo Arasaki, Laercio Gomes Lourenço; supervision: Marília Arruda Cardoso Smith. All Authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

  • Conflicts of Interest

    The Authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

  • Received May 11, 2022.
  • Revision received July 6, 2022.
  • Accepted July 11, 2022.
  • Copyright © 2022 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Sung H,
    2. Ferlay J,
    3. Siegel RL,
    4. Laversanne M,
    5. Soerjomataram I,
    6. Jemal A and
    7. Bray F
    : Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 71(3): 209-249, 2021. PMID: 33538338. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21660
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Nagini S
    : Carcinoma of the stomach: A review of epidemiology, pathogenesis, molecular genetics and chemoprevention. World J Gastrointest Oncol 4(7): 156-169, 2012. PMID: 22844547. DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v4.i7.156
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Wang C,
    2. Yuan Y and
    3. Hunt RH
    : The association between Helicobacter pylori infection and early gastric cancer: a meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol 102(8): 1789-1798, 2007. PMID: 17521398. DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01335.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Eslick GD
    : Helicobacter pylori infection causes gastric cancer? A review of the epidemiological, meta-analytic, and experimental evidence. World J Gastroenterol 12(19): 2991-2999, 2006. PMID: 16718777. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i19.2991
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Hooi JKY,
    2. Lai WY,
    3. Ng WK,
    4. Suen MMY,
    5. Underwood FE,
    6. Tanyingoh D,
    7. Malfertheiner P,
    8. Graham DY,
    9. Wong VWS,
    10. Wu JCY,
    11. Chan FKL,
    12. Sung JJY,
    13. Kaplan GG and
    14. Ng SC
    : Global prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection: systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastroenterology 153(2): 420-429, 2017. PMID: 28456631. DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.04.022
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Correa P
    : Gastric cancer: overview. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 42(2): 211-217, 2013. PMID: 23639637. DOI: 10.1016/j.gtc.2013.01.002
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Assumpção PP,
    2. Ishak G,
    3. Chen ES,
    4. Takeno SS,
    5. Leal MF,
    6. Guimarães AC,
    7. Calcagno DQ,
    8. Khayat AS,
    9. Demachki S,
    10. Smith Mde A and
    11. Burbano RR
    : Numerical aberrations of chromosome 8 detected by conventional cytogenetics and fluorescence in situ hybridization in individuals from northern Brazil with gastric adenocarcinoma. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 169(1): 45-49, 2006. PMID: 16875936. DOI: 10.1016/j.cancergencyto.2006.03.019
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Calcagno DQ,
    2. Leal MF,
    3. Seabra AD,
    4. Khayat AS,
    5. Chen ES,
    6. Demachki S,
    7. Assumpção PP,
    8. Faria MH,
    9. Rabenhorst SH,
    10. Ferreira MV,
    11. de Arruda Cardoso Smith M and
    12. Burbano RR
    : Interrelationship between chromosome 8 aneuploidy, C-MYC amplification and increased expression in individuals from northern Brazil with gastric adenocarcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 12(38): 6207-6211, 2006. PMID: 17036397. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i38.6207
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Calcagno DQ,
    2. Leal MF,
    3. Taken SS,
    4. Assumpção PP,
    5. Demachki S,
    6. Smith Mde A and
    7. Burbano RR
    : Aneuploidy of chromosome 8 and C-MYC amplification in individuals from northern Brazil with gastric adenocarcinoma. Anticancer Res 25(6B): 4069-4074, 2005. PMID: 16309200.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Costa Guimarães A,
    2. Gonçalves Quintana L,
    3. Ferreira Leal M,
    4. Satomi Takeno S,
    5. Pimentel Assumpção P,
    6. Moura Lima E,
    7. Salim Khayat A,
    8. Suchi Chen E,
    9. de Arruda Cardoso Smith M and
    10. Rodríguez Burbano R
    : Aneuploidy of chromosome 8 detected by fluorescence in situ hybridisation in ACP01 cell line gastric adenocarcinoma. Clin Exp Med 6(3): 129-133, 2006. PMID: 17061062. DOI: 10.1007/s10238-006-0108-5
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Leal MF,
    2. Martins do Nascimento JL,
    3. da Silva CE,
    4. Vita Lamarão MF,
    5. Calcagno DQ,
    6. Khayat AS,
    7. Assumpção PP,
    8. Cabral IR,
    9. de Arruda Cardoso Smith M and
    10. Burbano RR
    : Establishment and conventional cytogenetic characterization of three gastric cancer cell lines. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 195(1): 85-91, 2009. PMID: 19837275. DOI: 10.1016/j.cancergencyto.2009.04.020
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Lima EM,
    2. Rissino JD,
    3. Harada ML,
    4. Assumpção PP,
    5. Demachki S,
    6. Guimarães AC,
    7. Casartelli C,
    8. Smith MA and
    9. Burbano RR
    : Conventional cytogenetic characterization of a new cell line, ACP01, established from a primary human gastric tumor. Braz J Med Biol Res 37(12): 1831-1838, 2004. PMID: 15558189. DOI: 10.1590/s0100-879x2004001200008
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Burbano RR,
    2. Assumpção PP,
    3. Leal MF,
    4. Calcagno DQ,
    5. Guimarães AC,
    6. Khayat AS,
    7. Takeno SS,
    8. Chen ES and
    9. De Arruda Cardoso Smith M
    : C-MYC locus amplification as metastasis predictor in intestinal-type gastric adenocarcinomas: CGH study in Brazil. Anticancer Res 26(4B): 2909-2914, 2006. PMID: 16886612.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. Wang X,
    2. Liu Y,
    3. Shao D,
    4. Qian Z,
    5. Dong Z,
    6. Sun Y,
    7. Xing X,
    8. Cheng X,
    9. Du H,
    10. Hu Y,
    11. Li Y,
    12. Li L,
    13. Dong B,
    14. Li Z,
    15. Wu A,
    16. Wu X,
    17. Bu Z,
    18. Zong X,
    19. Zhu G,
    20. Ji Q,
    21. Wen XZ,
    22. Zhang LH and
    23. Ji JF
    : Recurrent amplification of MYC and TNFRSF11B in 8q24 is associated with poor survival in patients with gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer 19(1): 116-127, 2016. PMID: 25618371. DOI: 10.1007/s10120-015-0467-2
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Calcagno DQ,
    2. Guimarães AC,
    3. Leal MF,
    4. Seabra AD,
    5. Khayat AS,
    6. Pontes TB,
    7. Assumpção PP,
    8. De Arruda Cardoso Smith M and
    9. Burbano RR
    : MYC insertions in diffuse-type gastric adenocarcinoma. Anticancer Res 29(7): 2479-2483, 2009. PMID: 19596917.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Calcagno DQ,
    2. Leal MF,
    3. Assumpcao PP,
    4. Smith MA and
    5. Burbano RR
    : MYC and gastric adenocarcinoma carcinogenesis. World J Gastroenterol 14(39): 5962-5968, 2008. PMID: 18932273. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.14.5962
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Calcagno DQ,
    2. Leal MF,
    3. Demachki S,
    4. Araújo MT,
    5. Freitas FW,
    6. Oliveira e Souza D,
    7. Assumpção PP,
    8. Ishak G,
    9. de Arruda Cardoso Smith M and
    10. Burbano RR
    : MYC in gastric carcinoma and intestinal metaplasia of young adults. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 202(1): 63-66, 2010. PMID: 20804924. DOI: 10.1016/j.cancergencyto.2010.05.020
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Calcagno DQ,
    2. Freitas VM,
    3. Leal MF,
    4. de Souza CR,
    5. Demachki S,
    6. Montenegro R,
    7. Assumpção PP,
    8. Khayat AS,
    9. Smith Mde A,
    10. dos Santos AK and
    11. Burbano RR
    : MYC, FBXW7 and TP53 copy number variation and expression in gastric cancer. BMC Gastroenterol 13: 141, 2013. PMID: 24053468. DOI: 10.1186/1471-230X-13-141
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. de Souza CR,
    2. Leal MF,
    3. Calcagno DQ,
    4. Costa Sozinho EK,
    5. Borges Bdo N,
    6. Montenegro RC,
    7. Dos Santos AK,
    8. Dos Santos SE,
    9. Ribeiro HF,
    10. Assumpção PP,
    11. de Arruda Cardoso Smith M and
    12. Burbano RR
    : MYC deregulation in gastric cancer and its clinicopathological implications. PLoS One 8(5): e64420, 2013. PMID: 23717612. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0064420
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Zheng R,
    2. Liang J,
    3. Lu J,
    4. Li S,
    5. Zhang G,
    6. Wang X,
    7. Liu M,
    8. Wang W,
    9. Chu H,
    10. Tao G,
    11. Zhao Q,
    12. Wang M,
    13. Du M,
    14. Qiang F and
    15. Zhang Z
    : Genome-wide long non-coding RNAs identified a panel of novel plasma biomarkers for gastric cancer diagnosis. Gastric Cancer 22(4): 731-741, 2019. PMID: 30603909. DOI: 10.1007/s10120-018-00915-7
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Dong Z,
    2. Pei S,
    3. Zhao Y,
    4. Guo S and
    5. Wang Y
    : Identification of hub genes in gastric cancer with high heterogeneity based on weighted gene co-expression network. Crit Rev Eukaryot Gene Expr 30(2): 101-109, 2020. PMID: 32558489. DOI: 10.1615/CritRevEukaryotGeneExpr.2020028305
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Zhang Y,
    2. Li Q,
    3. Yu S,
    4. Zhu C,
    5. Zhang Z,
    6. Cao H and
    7. Xu J
    : Long non-coding RNA FAM84B-AS promotes resistance of gastric cancer to platinum drugs through inhibition of FAM84B expression. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 509(3): 753-762, 2019. PMID: 30638658. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2018.12.177
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Gu Y,
    2. Lin X,
    3. Kapoor A,
    4. Chow MJ,
    5. Jiang Y,
    6. Zhao K and
    7. Tang D
    : The oncogenic potential of the centromeric border protein FAM84B of the 8q24.21 gene desert. Genes (Basel) 11(3): 312, 2020. PMID: 32183428. DOI: 10.3390/genes11030312
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Saeki N,
    2. Usui T,
    3. Aoyagi K,
    4. Kim DH,
    5. Sato M,
    6. Mabuchi T,
    7. Yanagihara K,
    8. Ogawa K,
    9. Sakamoto H,
    10. Yoshida T and
    11. Sasaki H
    : Distinctive expression and function of four GSDM family genes (GSDMA-D) in normal and malignant upper gastrointestinal epithelium. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 48(3): 261-271, 2009. PMID: 19051310. DOI: 10.1002/gcc.20636
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Yang W,
    2. Niu L,
    3. Zhao X,
    4. Duan L,
    5. Wang X,
    6. Li Y,
    7. Chen J,
    8. Zhou W,
    9. Zhang Y,
    10. Fan D and
    11. Hong L
    : Pyroptosis impacts the prognosis and treatment response in gastric cancer via immune system modulation. Am J Cancer Res 12(4): 1511-1534, 2022. PMID: 35530274.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Wisnieski F,
    2. Calcagno DQ,
    3. Leal MF,
    4. Chen ES,
    5. Gigek CO,
    6. Santos LC,
    7. Pontes TB,
    8. Rasmussen LT,
    9. Payão SL,
    10. Assumpção PP,
    11. Lourenço LG,
    12. Demachki S,
    13. Artigiani R,
    14. Burbano RR and
    15. Smith MC
    : Differential expression of histone deacetylase and acetyltransferase genes in gastric cancer and their modulation by trichostatin A. Tumour Biol 35(7): 6373-6381, 2014. PMID: 24668547. DOI: 10.1007/s13277-014-1841-0
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Rasmussen LT,
    2. Labio RW,
    3. Gatti LL,
    4. Silva LC,
    5. Queiroz VF,
    6. Smith Mde A and
    7. Payão SL
    : Helicobacter pylori detection in gastric biopsies, saliva and dental plaque of Brazilian dyspeptic patients. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 105(3): 326-330, 2010. PMID: 20512249. DOI: 10.1590/s0074-02762010000300015
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Wisnieski F,
    2. Calcagno DQ,
    3. Leal MF,
    4. dos Santos LC,
    5. Gigek Cde O,
    6. Chen ES,
    7. Pontes TB,
    8. Assumpção PP,
    9. de Assumpção MB,
    10. Demachki S,
    11. Burbano RR and
    12. Smith Mde A
    : Reference genes for quantitative RT-PCR data in gastric tissues and cell lines. World J Gastroenterol 19(41): 7121-7128, 2013. PMID: 24222956. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i41.7121
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Biosystems A
    : Applied biosystems QuantStudio™ 12k flex real-time pcr system - multi-well plates and array card experiments. Available at: https://tools.thermofisher.com/content/sfs/manuals/cms_101435.pdf [Last accessed on July 11, 2022]
  22. ↵
    1. Bustin SA,
    2. Benes V,
    3. Garson JA,
    4. Hellemans J,
    5. Huggett J,
    6. Kubista M,
    7. Mueller R,
    8. Nolan T,
    9. Pfaffl MW,
    10. Shipley GL,
    11. Vandesompele J and
    12. Wittwer CT
    : The MIQE guidelines: minimum information for publication of quantitative real-time PCR experiments. Clin Chem 55(4): 611-622, 2009. PMID: 19246619. DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2008.112797
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. ↵
    1. Jamovi
    : The jamovi project. (version 2.2) [computer software]. Available at: https://www.Jamovi.Org [Last accessed on July 11, 2022]
  24. ↵
    1. Harrison E,
    2. Drake T and
    3. Ots R
    : Finalfit: Quickly create elegant regression results tables and plots when modelling. [r package]. Available at: https://cran.R-project.Org/package=finalfit [Last accessed on July 11, 2022]
    1. Kassambara A,
    2. Kosinski M and
    3. Biecek P
    : Drawing survival curves using ‘ggplot2’. [r package]. Available at: https://cran.R-project.Org/package=survminer [Last accessed on July 11, 2022]
    1. Royston P,
    2. Altman DG and
    3. Sauerbrei W
    : Dichotomizing continuous predictors in multiple regression: a bad idea. Stat Med 25(1): 127-141, 2006. PMID: 16217841. DOI: 10.1002/sim.2331
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Therneau T and
    2. Lumley T
    : Survival analysis. [r package]. Available at: https://cran.R-project.Org/package=survival [Last accessed on July 11, 2022]
  26. ↵
    1. Beroukhim R,
    2. Mermel CH,
    3. Porter D,
    4. Wei G,
    5. Raychaudhuri S,
    6. Donovan J,
    7. Barretina J,
    8. Boehm JS,
    9. Dobson J,
    10. Urashima M,
    11. Mc Henry KT,
    12. Pinchback RM,
    13. Ligon AH,
    14. Cho YJ,
    15. Haery L,
    16. Greulich H,
    17. Reich M,
    18. Winckler W,
    19. Lawrence MS,
    20. Weir BA,
    21. Tanaka KE,
    22. Chiang DY,
    23. Bass AJ,
    24. Loo A,
    25. Hoffman C,
    26. Prensner J,
    27. Liefeld T,
    28. Gao Q,
    29. Yecies D,
    30. Signoretti S,
    31. Maher E,
    32. Kaye FJ,
    33. Sasaki H,
    34. Tepper JE,
    35. Fletcher JA,
    36. Tabernero J,
    37. Baselga J,
    38. Tsao MS,
    39. Demichelis F,
    40. Rubin MA,
    41. Janne PA,
    42. Daly MJ,
    43. Nucera C,
    44. Levine RL,
    45. Ebert BL,
    46. Gabriel S,
    47. Rustgi AK,
    48. Antonescu CR,
    49. Ladanyi M,
    50. Letai A,
    51. Garraway LA,
    52. Loda M,
    53. Beer DG,
    54. True LD,
    55. Okamoto A,
    56. Pomeroy SL,
    57. Singer S,
    58. Golub TR,
    59. Lander ES,
    60. Getz G,
    61. Sellers WR and
    62. Meyerson M
    : The landscape of somatic copy-number alteration across human cancers. Nature 463(7283): 899-905, 2010. PMID: 20164920. DOI: 10.1038/nature08822
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Grampp S,
    2. Platt JL,
    3. Lauer V,
    4. Salama R,
    5. Kranz F,
    6. Neumann VK,
    7. Wach S,
    8. Stöhr C,
    9. Hartmann A,
    10. Eckardt KU,
    11. Ratcliffe PJ,
    12. Mole DR and
    13. Schödel J
    : Genetic variation at the 8q24.21 renal cancer susceptibility locus affects HIF binding to a MYC enhancer. Nat Commun 7: 13183, 2016. PMID: 27774982. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms13183
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Gudmundsson J,
    2. Sulem P,
    3. Gudbjartsson DF,
    4. Masson G,
    5. Petursdottir V,
    6. Hardarson S,
    7. Gudjonsson SA,
    8. Johannsdottir H,
    9. Helgadottir HT,
    10. Stacey SN,
    11. Magnusson OT,
    12. Helgason H,
    13. Panadero A,
    14. van der Zanden LF,
    15. Aben KK,
    16. Vermeulen SH,
    17. Oosterwijk E,
    18. Kong A,
    19. Mayordomo JI,
    20. Sverrisdottir A,
    21. Jonsson E,
    22. Gudbjartsson T,
    23. Einarsson GV,
    24. Kiemeney LA,
    25. Thorsteinsdottir U,
    26. Rafnar T and
    27. Stefansson K
    : A common variant at 8q24.21 is associated with renal cell cancer. Nat Commun 4: 2776, 2013. PMID: 24220699. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms3776
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Huppi K,
    2. Pitt JJ,
    3. Wahlberg BM and
    4. Caplen NJ
    : The 8q24 gene desert: an oasis of non-coding transcriptional activity. Front Genet 3: 69, 2012. PMID: 22558003. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2012.00069
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Jin K,
    2. Wang S,
    3. Zhang Y,
    4. Xia M,
    5. Mo Y,
    6. Li X,
    7. Li G,
    8. Zeng Z,
    9. Xiong W and
    10. He Y
    : Long non-coding RNA PVT1 interacts with MYC and its downstream molecules to synergistically promote tumorigenesis. Cell Mol Life Sci 76(21): 4275-4289, 2019. PMID: 31309249. DOI: 10.1007/s00018-019-03222-1
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Oktay Y,
    2. Ülgen E,
    3. Can Ö,
    4. Akyerli CB,
    5. Yüksel Ş,
    6. Erdemgil Y,
    7. Durası IM,
    8. Henegariu OI,
    9. Nanni EP,
    10. Selevsek N,
    11. Grossmann J,
    12. Erson-Omay EZ,
    13. Bai H,
    14. Gupta M,
    15. Lee W,
    16. Turcan Ş,
    17. Özpınar A,
    18. Huse JT,
    19. Sav MA,
    20. Flanagan A,
    21. Günel M,
    22. Sezerman OU,
    23. Yakıcıer MC,
    24. Pamir MN and
    25. Özduman K
    : IDH-mutant glioma specific association of rs55705857 located at 8q24.21 involves MYC deregulation. Sci Rep 6: 27569, 2016. PMID: 27282637. DOI: 10.1038/srep27569
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Chattaragada MS,
    2. Riganti C,
    3. Sassoe M,
    4. Principe M,
    5. Santamorena MM,
    6. Roux C,
    7. Curcio C,
    8. Evangelista A,
    9. Allavena P,
    10. Salvia R,
    11. Rusev B,
    12. Scarpa A,
    13. Cappello P and
    14. Novelli F
    : FAM49B, a novel regulator of mitochondrial function and integrity that suppresses tumor metastasis. Oncogene 37(6): 697-709, 2018. PMID: 29059164. DOI: 10.1038/onc.2017.358
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Fort L,
    2. Batista JM,
    3. Thomason PA,
    4. Spence HJ,
    5. Whitelaw JA,
    6. Tweedy L,
    7. Greaves J,
    8. Martin KJ,
    9. Anderson KI,
    10. Brown P,
    11. Lilla S,
    12. Neilson MP,
    13. Tafelmeyer P,
    14. Zanivan S,
    15. Ismail S,
    16. Bryant DM,
    17. Tomkinson NCO,
    18. Chamberlain LH,
    19. Mastick GS,
    20. Insall RH and
    21. Machesky LM
    : Fam49/CYRI interacts with Rac1 and locally suppresses protrusions. Nat Cell Biol 20(10): 1159-1171, 2018. PMID: 30250061. DOI: 10.1038/s41556-018-0198-9
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Shang W,
    2. Jiang Y,
    3. Boettcher M,
    4. Ding K,
    5. Mollenauer M,
    6. Liu Z,
    7. Wen X,
    8. Liu C,
    9. Hao P,
    10. Zhao S,
    11. McManus MT,
    12. Wei L,
    13. Weiss A and
    14. Wang H
    : Genome-wide CRISPR screen identifies FAM49B as a key regulator of actin dynamics and T cell activation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 115(17): E4051-E4060, 2018. PMID: 29632189. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1801340115
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Whitelaw JA,
    2. Lilla S,
    3. Paul NR,
    4. Fort L,
    5. Zanivan S and
    6. Machesky LM
    : CYRI/Fam49 proteins represent a new class of Rac1 interactors. Commun Integr Biol 12(1): 112-118, 2019. PMID: 31413787. DOI: 10.1080/19420889.2019.1643665
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Yuki KE,
    2. Marei H,
    3. Fiskin E,
    4. Eva MM,
    5. Gopal AA,
    6. Schwartzentruber JA,
    7. Majewski J,
    8. Cellier M,
    9. Mandl JN,
    10. Vidal SM,
    11. Malo D and
    12. Dikic I
    : CYRI/FAM49B negatively regulates RAC1-driven cytoskeletal remodelling and protects against bacterial infection. Nat Microbiol 4(9): 1516-1531, 2019. PMID: 31285585. DOI: 10.1038/s41564-019-0484-8
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Li Y,
    2. Xiong Y,
    3. Wang Z,
    4. Han J,
    5. Shi S,
    6. He J,
    7. Shen N,
    8. Wu W,
    9. Wang R,
    10. Lv W,
    11. Deng Y and
    12. Liu W
    : FAM49B promotes breast cancer proliferation, metastasis, and chemoresistance by stabilizing ELAVL1 protein and regulating downstream Rab10/TLR4 pathway. Cancer Cell Int 21(1): 534, 2021. PMID: 34645466. DOI: 10.1186/s12935-021-02244-9
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Zhang Y,
    2. Du P,
    3. Li Y,
    4. Zhu Q,
    5. Song X,
    6. Liu S,
    7. Hao J,
    8. Liu L,
    9. Liu F,
    10. Hu Y,
    11. Jiang L,
    12. Ma Q,
    13. Lu W and
    14. Liu Y
    : TASP1 promotes gallbladder cancer cell proliferation and metastasis by upregulating FAM49B via PI3K/AKT pathway. Int J Biol Sci 16(5): 739-751, 2020. PMID: 32071545. DOI: 10.7150/ijbs.40516
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    1. Cheng C,
    2. Cui H,
    3. Zhang L,
    4. Jia Z,
    5. Song B,
    6. Wang F,
    7. Li Y,
    8. Liu J,
    9. Kong P,
    10. Shi R,
    11. Bi Y,
    12. Yang B,
    13. Wang J,
    14. Zhao Z,
    15. Zhang Y,
    16. Hu X,
    17. Yang J,
    18. He C,
    19. Zhao Z,
    20. Wang J,
    21. Xi Y,
    22. Xu E,
    23. Li G,
    24. Guo S,
    25. Chen Y,
    26. Yang X,
    27. Chen X,
    28. Liang J,
    29. Guo J,
    30. Cheng X,
    31. Wang C,
    32. Zhan Q and
    33. Cui Y
    : Genomic analyses reveal FAM84B and the NOTCH pathway are associated with the progression of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Gigascience 5: 1, 2016. PMID: 26759717. DOI: 10.1186/s13742-015-0107-0
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Jiang Y,
    2. Lin X,
    3. Kapoor A,
    4. He L,
    5. Wei F,
    6. Gu Y,
    7. Mei W,
    8. Zhao K,
    9. Yang H and
    10. Tang D
    : FAM84B promotes prostate tumorigenesis through a network alteration. Ther Adv Med Oncol 11: 1758835919846372, 2019. PMID: 31205500. DOI: 10.1177/1758835919846372
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Wang M,
    2. Li C and
    3. Shi W
    : FAM84B acts as a tumor promoter in human glioma via affecting the Akt/GSK-3β/β-catenin pathway. Biofactors 47(4): 600-611, 2021. PMID: 33759248. DOI: 10.1002/biof.1727
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Wong N,
    2. Gu Y,
    3. Kapoor A,
    4. Lin X,
    5. Ojo D,
    6. Wei F,
    7. Yan J,
    8. de Melo J,
    9. Major P,
    10. Wood G,
    11. Aziz T,
    12. Cutz JC,
    13. Bonert M,
    14. Patterson AJ and
    15. Tang D
    : Upregulation of FAM84B during prostate cancer progression. Oncotarget 8(12): 19218-19235, 2017. PMID: 28186973. DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.15168
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    1. Zhang X,
    2. Xu J,
    3. Yan R,
    4. Zhang Y,
    5. Hu Z,
    6. Fu H,
    7. You Q,
    8. Cai Q and
    9. Yang D
    : FAM84B, amplified in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, promotes tumorigenesis through the Wnt/β-catenin pathway. Aging (Albany NY) 12(8): 6808-6822, 2020. PMID: 32291380. DOI: 10.18632/aging.103044
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    1. Jung JH,
    2. Shin EA,
    3. Kim JH,
    4. Sim DY,
    5. Lee H,
    6. Park JE,
    7. Lee HJ and
    8. Kim SH
    : NEDD9 inhibition by miR-25-5p activation is critically involved in co-treatment of melatonin- and pterostilbene-induced apoptosis in colorectal cancer cells. Cancers (Basel) 11(11): 1684, 2019. PMID: 31671847. DOI: 10.3390/cancers11111684
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    1. Tabibkhooei A,
    2. Izadpanahi M,
    3. Arab A,
    4. Zare-Mirzaei A,
    5. Minaeian S,
    6. Rostami A and
    7. Mohsenian A
    : Profiling of novel circulating microRNAs as a non-invasive biomarker in diagnosis and follow-up of high and low-grade gliomas. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 190: 105652, 2020. PMID: 31896490. DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2019.105652
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. ↵
    1. Anauate AC,
    2. Leal MF,
    3. Calcagno DQ,
    4. Gigek CO,
    5. Karia BTR,
    6. Wisnieski F,
    7. Dos Santos LC,
    8. Chen ES,
    9. Burbano RR and
    10. Smith MAC
    : The complex network between MYC oncogene and microRNAs in gastric cancer: an overview. Int J Mol Sci 21(5): 1782, 2020. PMID: 32150871. DOI: 10.3390/ijms21051782
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. ↵
    1. Saeki N,
    2. Kim DH,
    3. Usui T,
    4. Aoyagi K,
    5. Tatsuta T,
    6. Aoki K,
    7. Yanagihara K,
    8. Tamura M,
    9. Mizushima H,
    10. Sakamoto H,
    11. Ogawa K,
    12. Ohki M,
    13. Shiroishi T,
    14. Yoshida T and
    15. Sasaki H
    : GASDERMIN, suppressed frequently in gastric cancer, is a target of LMO1 in TGF-beta-dependent apoptotic signalling. Oncogene 26(45): 6488-6498, 2007. PMID: 17471240. DOI: 10.1038/sj.onc.1210475
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. ↵
    1. Saeki N,
    2. Kuwahara Y,
    3. Sasaki H,
    4. Satoh H and
    5. Shiroishi T
    : Gasdermin (Gsdm) localizing to mouse Chromosome 11 is predominantly expressed in upper gastrointestinal tract but significantly suppressed in human gastric cancer cells. Mamm Genome 11(9): 718-724, 2000. PMID: 10967128. DOI: 10.1007/s003350010138
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. ↵
    1. Berkel C and
    2. Cacan E
    : Differential expression and copy number variation of gasdermin (GSDM) family members, pore-forming proteins in pyroptosis, in normal and malignant serous ovarian tissue. Inflammation 44(6): 2203-2216, 2021. PMID: 34091823. DOI: 10.1007/s10753-021-01493-0
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Cui YQ,
    2. Meng F,
    3. Zhan WL,
    4. Dai ZT and
    5. Liao X
    : High expression of GSDMC is associated with poor survival in kidney clear cell cancer. Biomed Res Int 2021: 5282894, 2021. PMID: 34778452. DOI: 10.1155/2021/5282894
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Wei J,
    2. Xu Z,
    3. Chen X,
    4. Wang X,
    5. Zeng S,
    6. Qian L,
    7. Yang X,
    8. Ou C,
    9. Lin W,
    10. Gong Z and
    11. Yan Y
    : Overexpression of GSDMC is a prognostic factor for predicting a poor outcome in lung adenocarcinoma. Mol Med Rep 21(1): 360-370, 2020. PMID: 31939622. DOI: 10.3892/mmr.2019.10837
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. ↵
    1. Miguchi M,
    2. Hinoi T,
    3. Shimomura M,
    4. Adachi T,
    5. Saito Y,
    6. Niitsu H,
    7. Kochi M,
    8. Sada H,
    9. Sotomaru Y,
    10. Ikenoue T,
    11. Shigeyasu K,
    12. Tanakaya K,
    13. Kitadai Y,
    14. Sentani K,
    15. Oue N,
    16. Yasui W and
    17. Ohdan H
    : Gasdermin C is upregulated by inactivation of transforming growth factor β receptor type II in the presence of mutated Apc, promoting colorectal cancer proliferation. PLoS One 11(11): e0166422, 2016. PMID: 27835699. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0166422
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. ↵
    1. Hou J,
    2. Zhao R,
    3. Xia W,
    4. Chang CW,
    5. You Y,
    6. Hsu JM,
    7. Nie L,
    8. Chen Y,
    9. Wang YC,
    10. Liu C,
    11. Wang WJ,
    12. Wu Y,
    13. Ke B,
    14. Hsu JL,
    15. Huang K,
    16. Ye Z,
    17. Yang Y,
    18. Xia X,
    19. Li Y,
    20. Li CW,
    21. Shao B,
    22. Tainer JA and
    23. Hung MC
    : PD-L1-mediated gasdermin C expression switches apoptosis to pyroptosis in cancer cells and facilitates tumour necrosis. Nat Cell Biol 22(10): 1264-1275, 2020. PMID: 32929201. DOI: 10.1038/s41556-020-0575-z
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. ↵
    1. Zhang JY,
    2. Zhou B,
    3. Sun RY,
    4. Ai YL,
    5. Cheng K,
    6. Li FN,
    7. Wang BR,
    8. Liu FJ,
    9. Jiang ZH,
    10. Wang WJ,
    11. Zhou D,
    12. Chen HZ and
    13. Wu Q
    : The metabolite α-KG induces GSDMC-dependent pyroptosis through death receptor 6-activated caspase-8. Cell Res 31(9): 980-997, 2021. PMID: 34012073. DOI: 10.1038/s41422-021-00506-9
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. ↵
    1. Wilson C and
    2. Kanhere A
    : 8q24.21 Locus: a paradigm to link non-coding RNAs, genome polymorphisms and cancer. Int J Mol Sci 22(3): 1094, 2021. PMID: 33499210. DOI: 10.3390/ijms22031094
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. ↵
    1. Lauren P
    : The two histological main types of gastric carcinoma: Diffuse and so-called intestinal-type carcinoma. An attempt at a histo-clinical classification. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand 64: 31-49, 1965. PMID: 14320675. DOI: 10.1111/apm.1965.64.1.31
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. ↵
    1. Du M,
    2. Yuan T,
    3. Schilter KF,
    4. Dittmar RL,
    5. Mackinnon A,
    6. Huang X,
    7. Tschannen M,
    8. Worthey E,
    9. Jacob H,
    10. Xia S,
    11. Gao J,
    12. Tillmans L,
    13. Lu Y,
    14. Liu P,
    15. Thibodeau SN and
    16. Wang L
    : Prostate cancer risk locus at 8q24 as a regulatory hub by physical interactions with multiple genomic loci across the genome. Hum Mol Genet 24(1): 154-166, 2015. PMID: 25149474. DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddu426
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Washington K
    : 7th edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual: stomach. Ann Surg Oncol 17(12): 3077-3079, 2010. PMID: 20882416. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-010-1362-z
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research: 42 (9)
Anticancer Research
Vol. 42, Issue 9
September 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Genetic and Transcriptional Analysis of 8q24.21 Cluster in Gastric Cancer
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
13 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Genetic and Transcriptional Analysis of 8q24.21 Cluster in Gastric Cancer
BRUNNO SANTOS PEREIRA, FERNANDA WISNIESKI, DANIELLE QUEIROZ CALCAGNO, LEONARDO CAIRES SANTOS, CAROLINA OLIVEIRA GIGEK, ELIZABETH SUCHI CHEN, LUCAS TREVIZANI RASMUSSEN, SPENCER LUIZ MARQUES PAYÃO, RENATA SANCHES ALMEIDA, CAMILA ALBUQUERQUE PINTO, BRUNO TAKAO REAL KARIA, RICARDO ARTIGIANI, SAMIA DEMACHKI, PAULO PIMENTEL ASSUMPÇÃO, LAERCIO GOMES LOURENÇO, CARLOS HARUO ARASAKI, ROMMEL RODRÍGUEZ BURBANO, MARIANA FERREIRA LEAL, MARILIA ARRUDA CARDOSO SMITH
Anticancer Research Sep 2022, 42 (9) 4381-4394; DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.15938

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Genetic and Transcriptional Analysis of 8q24.21 Cluster in Gastric Cancer
BRUNNO SANTOS PEREIRA, FERNANDA WISNIESKI, DANIELLE QUEIROZ CALCAGNO, LEONARDO CAIRES SANTOS, CAROLINA OLIVEIRA GIGEK, ELIZABETH SUCHI CHEN, LUCAS TREVIZANI RASMUSSEN, SPENCER LUIZ MARQUES PAYÃO, RENATA SANCHES ALMEIDA, CAMILA ALBUQUERQUE PINTO, BRUNO TAKAO REAL KARIA, RICARDO ARTIGIANI, SAMIA DEMACHKI, PAULO PIMENTEL ASSUMPÇÃO, LAERCIO GOMES LOURENÇO, CARLOS HARUO ARASAKI, ROMMEL RODRÍGUEZ BURBANO, MARIANA FERREIRA LEAL, MARILIA ARRUDA CARDOSO SMITH
Anticancer Research Sep 2022, 42 (9) 4381-4394; DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.15938
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Acknowledgements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Ginsenoside Rh4 Induces Apoptosis Through ROS-Mediated Fas Signaling in Human Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma NPC/HK1 Cells
  • Genome-wide Analysis Highlights rs4671908 and rs2238431 as Predictors of Survival in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
  • Implications of the Cuproptosis Protein SLC31A1 for the Immune Microenvironment and Temozolomide Sensitivity in Glioblastoma
Show more Experimental Studies

Keywords

  • Gastric cancer
  • gene expression
  • CNV
  • 8q24.21
Anticancer Research

© 2026 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire