Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleExperimental Studies
Open Access

Altered mRNA Expression Due to Rectal Perforation in a Porcine Model – A Pilot Study

IOANNIS OIKONOMAKIS, DAVID BRODIN, TAL M. HÖRER, PER SKOOG, JENNY SEILITZ, KRISTOFER F. NILSSON, ADRIAN D. MEEHAN and KJELL JANSSON
Anticancer Research June 2022, 42 (6) 2827-2833; DOI: https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.15764
IOANNIS OIKONOMAKIS
1Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: ioannis.oikonomakis@regionorebrolan.se
DAVID BRODIN
2Department of Biosciences and Nutrition, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
TAL M. HÖRER
3Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
PER SKOOG
4Department of Vascular Surgery and Institute of Medicine Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital and Academy, Gothenburg, Sweden;
5Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
JENNY SEILITZ
3Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
KRISTOFER F. NILSSON
3Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
ADRIAN D. MEEHAN
6Department of Geriatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
KJELL JANSSON
1Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background: Anastomotic leakage is the most serious and unwelcome complication in rectal surgery. It has a great impact on postoperative morbidity and mortality. In this pilot study, changes of mRNA expression in blood were analyzed in an animal model designed to imitate anastomotic leakage. Materials and Methods: Twelve pigs were randomized into two groups: A sham-operated control group and an experimental group in which iatrogenic rectal perforation was performed. The changes in the mRNA expression at 4 hours after creating the perforation were studied. Microarray analysis was performed using Gene Chip whole porcine genome array. mRNA expression of 19,124 genes was investigated. Results: Significantly increased levels of genes with a fold change greater than 2 were found, including 276 coding for unknown proteins and 48 coding for known proteins. Eleven of those which coded for known proteins were up-regulated with a fold change >4. Conclusion: Eleven known genes were highly up-regulated after rectal perforation. These genes were mainly involved in inflammatory response, intracellular signaling and cell membrane regulation. Their corresponding proteins might potentially be clinical biomarkers of anastomotic leakage and should be evaluated in further clinical studies.

Key Words:
  • Colorectal surgery
  • anastomotic leakage
  • gene expression analysis
  • microarray

Anastomotic leakage (AL) is a common and feared complication in colorectal surgery. The diagnosis of AL is often made late in the process due to the fact that there are no conclusive laboratory tests or X-ray examinations to determine such complication early in the process. C-Reactive protein is the most commonly used marker in laboratory tests, but it is clinically reliable only after 4-5 postoperative days. Computed tomography with anal enema is often unable to detect a leak in the early postoperative stage (1-4). Intraperitoneal microdialysis has been used in studies and has shown promising results but has not been used in clinical care for early diagnosis of AL (5-11). Cytokines are sensitive biomarkers for inflammation but not specific for the detection of AL (12-17).

mRNA analysis offers a new pathway in the search for laboratory markers specific for detecting AL. mRNA links genetic information from DNA to the ribosome in order to facilitate gene expression. RNA polymerase transcribes primary transcript mRNA into mature mRNA. Mature mRNA is then translated into a protein in the ribosome. mRNA genetic information is a sequence of nucleotides which are arranged into codons each consisting of three base pairs. Each codon encodes for a specific amino acid, except the stop codons, which terminate protein synthesis (18). Two other types of RNA contribute to protein synthesis, transfer RNA contributes in the recognition of the codon and ribosomal RNA plays a central role in the construction of protein chains (19). There are now commercially available microarrays for both human and animal specimens that can detect the expression of up to 20-30,000 genes through mRNA analysis (20-25).

In this pilot study, alterations of mRNA expression in blood samples due to rectal perforation were compared between an experimental group and a control group. The aim of this study was to identify a biochemical marker for the early detection of AL by analysing the changes in gene expression in whole blood in response to rectal perforation using a whole genome porcine microarray by an inductive strategy.

Materials and Methods

Animals. In this study, 12 healthy 3-month-old Swedish landrace pigs of both sexes were used, with mean body weight 28 kg (21-37). The pigs were housed at room temperature at a farm, with free access to standard porcine fodder before the experiment. They were kept under a 16-hour day and 8-hour night cycle. The experiment was approved by the Regional Animal Ethics Committee in Linköping (Dnr 174-3). The study was conducted in accordance with the guidelines of the European Union for the protection of animals used for scientific purposes. The animal experimentation in this study is reported according to the ARRIVE guidelines (26).

Anesthesia, fluid administration, ventilation and euthanasia. As pre-medication at the farm, the pigs were given azaperone [200 mg intramuscularly (i.m.); Elanco, Herlev, Denmark]. On arriving at the laboratory, anesthesia was induced by tiletamine (6 mg kg–1 i.m.; Virbac, Kolding, Denmark), zolazepam (6 mg kg–1 i.m.; Virbac) and azaperone (4 mg kg–1 i.m.). In addition, atropine (1.5 mg, i.m.; Mylan, Stockholm, Sweden) was given to prevent excessive salivation. The animals received two peripheral catheters (1.1 mm, Venflon Pro Safety; BD, Helsingborg, Sweden) in auricular veins. Propofol [1-2 mg kg–1 intravenously (i.v.); Fresenius Kabi, Uppsala, Sweden] was given if needed. The animals were orally intubated in the prone position with a 6-mm endotracheal tube (Covidien, Tullamore, Ireland). Anesthesia was maintained by propofol (10 mg kg–1 h–1 i.v.) and Petidin (1 ml kg–1 h–1) applied by motorized syringe pumps (Alaris CC; Cardinal Health, Rulle, Switzerland). The depth of anesthesia was intermittently monitored by pain response. No muscle relaxants were given. Ringer’s acetate (10 ml kg–1 h–1, i.v.; Fresenius Kabi) and 10% glucose with 40 mM sodium and 20 mM potassium (0.5 ml kg–1 h–1, i.v.; Fresenius Kabi) were administered by volume pumps (Alaris GP, CareFusion Corporation, Switzerland) to substitute for fluid loss. The pigs were ventilated using volume-control ventilation mode (PV 501, Breas Medical AB, Sweden) to achieve an arterial pCO2 of 5.0-5.3 kPa and FiO2 was adjusted to maintain arterial pO2 at 12-18 kPa. The animals were placed on a thermal mattress and covered with a forced-air warming blanket. At the end of the experiment, euthanasia was performed with a rapid i.v. injection of 40 mmol potassium chloride (B. Braun, Danderyd, Sweden), and asystole and circulatory arrest were confirmed with ECG and blood pressure recordings.

Surgical preparation and measurements. A 4-Fr introducer was placed in the right carotid artery by open exploration for the measurement of systemic blood pressure as well as blood sampling. A midline abdominal incision was performed. A 14-Fr Foley catheter was inserted into the urinary bladder and fixed with a purse-string suture. Rectal perforation was performed with scissors. The perforation was located 8 cm above the anal verge. The diameter of the hole was 3 cm. The midline incision was sutured at the end of the procedure with a continuous suture.

Protocol. Using a sealed envelope system, the animals were randomized before the operation into two groups, with six in each group: An experimental group with rectal perforation; and a sham-operated control group. After the operation, there was an intervention-free period of 1 hour. Blood samples for mRNA analysis were taken before the laparotomy, and 4 hours after performing rectal perforation in PAXgene Blood RNA tubes (PreAnalytiX QIAGEN/BD, Hombrechtikon, Switzerland).

mRNA analysis. mRNA analysis was performed by the Bioinformatics and Expression Analysis, a core facility, which is supported by the Faculty Board of research at the Karolinska Institute and the Committee for Research at the Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden. RNA quality was assessed by RNA Integrity Number (RIN) and an RIN ≥9 was considered satisfactory for inclusion. RNA quantity of at least 3.5 μg was required for proceeding with expression analysis. Total RNA was isolated from PAXgene Blood RNA tubes with PAXgene Blood RNA Kit standard protocol on a QIAcube, Qiagen. Total RNA quality was assessed by Agilent Technologies 2200 Tapestation (Agilent Technologies, Waldbronn, Germany) and concentrations were measured by NanoDrop ND-1000 Spectrophotometer NanoDrop Technologies, Wilmington, DE, USA).

Labelling protocol: 150 ng of total RNA was used to generate amplified sense-strand DNA targets using Affymetrix WT Plus Kit (Affymetrix Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA) followed by fragmentation and biotinylation.

Hybridization protocol: 2.2 μg of single-stranded DNA target was hybridized to Porcine Gene 1.0 ST Arrays in Affymetrix Gene Chip Hybridization Oven 645 (Affymetrix Inc.) (27). Hybridization, washing, and staining was carried out on Affymetrix GeneChip® Fluidics Station 450 (Affymetrix Inc.), according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The fluorescent intensities were determined with Affymetrix GeneChip Scanner 3000 7G (Affymetrix Inc.). Protein identification was performed according to gene databases (www.uniprot.org)

Statistical analysis. Statistical analysis was performed with unpaired t-test with the assumption that the values were normally distributed, in R-interface software system, version 3.6.1. p-Values were adjusted for multiple testing using with Benjamini-Hochberg procedure. Values of p<0.05 were considered significant.

Results

Preoperatively and throughout the experiment, both groups had stable pulse, blood pressure and urine production. In total, 19,124 mRNA genes were investigated. A significant number of genes were found to be up-regulated and with a fold-change (FC)>2, including 276 genes which coded for unknown proteins and 48 genes which coded for known proteins. The majority of the annotated genes are involved in the inflammatory response, regulation of the membrane and intracellular signaling (Table I). Furthermore, 11 up-regulated genes were identified with FC>4 and these are presented separately by Probe Set ID in the text below and in Figure 1.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

Gene expression data for group comparison. Includes the Probe Set Identification Number (ID), fold change (FC) at 4 hours after surgery, p-value and protein description of the 48 mRNAs which coded for known proteins.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Boxplot showing the proteins corresponding to the 11 known genes with the highest fold changes (>4) in mRNA expression at 4 hours after surgery in the sham-operated control (CON) animals and those with anastomotic leakage (AL). Preoperative and postoperative expression levels are shown. The black line in the boxes indicates the median value. The boundaries indicate the highest and lowest expression. For a better overview, fold-change values were log2-transformed. All statistical calculations were performed on non-logarithmic values.

Discussion

The porcine model for AL was a feasible model for the whole genome expression array study of whole blood using the Affymetrix porcine array. The mRNA in whole blood is derived mostly from lymphocytes (T-cells, B-cells, natural killer cells and monocytes). Circulating blood cells may carry valuable information in their RNA expression profile that may be indicative of incipient inflammatory processes (19). The Affymetrix microarray method was chosen for assessing mRNA expression in this study. In doing so, financial expenditure was taken into account and consideration was given to the possibility of obtaining a large number of mRNA assays, while at the same time being aware of the advantages of other commercially available methods (27). To measure how much mRNA signal changes from an initial value (before rectal perforation) to a final value (4 hours after rectal perforation) unlogged FC was used. Among the 1,9124 mRNA genes which significantly changed 4 hours after the perforation, 276 coded for unknown proteins and 48 known proteins. The 11 up-regulated genes with a high FC (over 4) out of the genes that coded for a known protein are known to be involved in increased inflammatory and immunological response, intracellular signaling and cell membrane regulation. All these findings are consistent with the pathophysiological process of acute inflammation/infection that occurs immediately after rectal perforation. mRNA transcript with ID 15242239 and corresponding protein tumor necrosis factor-alpha induced protein 6, was the protein with the highest FC, and is a secretory protein member of the hyaluronan-binding protein family. The hyaluronan-binding domain is known to be involved in extracellular matrix stability and cell migration. This gene can be induced by pro inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α and interleukin-1 (28-30). TNF-α and interleukin-1 are proteins that rise rapidly in the blood after AL (3, 10, 15).

The protein encoded by the gene with ID 15218761 is an integral membrane protein and inward-rectifier type potassium channel. The encoded protein regulates the potassium flow into the cell, as well as sodium potassium homeostasis but its function in the inflammatory process occurring after AL is still unknown (31). The ID of the gene with the third-highest FC in expression corresponds to the protein haptoglobin. This protein binds free plasma hemoglobin, allowing degradative enzymes to gain access to hemoglobin, preventing the loss of iron through the kidneys, thus protecting the kidneys from damage by hemoglobin. The role of haptoglobin in the inflammatory process is to attract a monocyte to the site of inflammation (28-30, 32). The main group of enzymes responsible for collagen and protein degradation in the extracellular matrix is the matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs). MMP-1 was significantly up-regulated in the group with AL, consistent with previous studies (33). MMP-9 is also associated with AL and can be increased by lipocalin-2 when AL occurs (34, 35). Resistin is a protein which is up-regulated in inflammatory processes and even in carcinogenesis, like S100A and B and activin receptor type 1B (36-38).

Blood samples were analyzed 4 hours after a rectal perforation in pigs with the intention of emulating the reaction in the body immediately after an AL. The study concentrates on the 48 mRNAs encoding for a known protein and attempts to understand the initial pathophysiological processes immediately after the leakage. Ultimately, it would be beneficial to identify markers with high clinical sensitivity and specificity even during the first 3 days after an AL in order to treat it. Based on the results of this study, further studies should be conducted with an aim of finding appropriate clinical laboratory markers for AL.

Limitations of the study. The porcine and human gastrointestinal tracts are very similar and, therefore, pigs were used in this study; however, specific proteins may vary significantly between species. The majority of mRNAs found to be up-regulated in this study coded for unknown proteins. Their significance is still to be explored, as their function is still unknown. The study was only performed during the first 4 postoperative hours. AL usually develops gradually due to local ischemia in the first 3-5 postoperative days.

Conclusion

mRNA expression of 11 known genes was up-regulated in pigs after surgical creation of a rectal perforation. These genes were mainly involved in inflammatory response, intracellular signaling and cell membrane regulation. Their corresponding proteins might potentially be clinical biomarkers of AL and should be evaluated in further studies.

Acknowledgements

Bioinformatics and Expression Analysis, core facility (BEA) was supported by the Board of Research at the Karolinska Institute and the Committee for Research at the Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden. Funding was from the Research Committee of Region Örebro County.

Footnotes

  • Authors’ Contributions

    Ioannis Oikonomakis, David Brodin and Kjell Jannson designed the study. David Brodin performed the statistical analysis. Ioannis Oikonomakis, Tal Hörer, Kristofer Nilsson, Jenny Seilitz and Kjell Jansson performed the study. All the Authors analyzed the results and contributed to writing the article.

  • Conflicts of Interest

    None of the Authors have any relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

  • Received April 11, 2022.
  • Revision received May 14, 2022.
  • Accepted May 19, 2022.
  • Copyright © 2022 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.

This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 international license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0).

References

  1. ↵
    1. Matthiessen P ,
    2. Hallböök O ,
    3. Rutegård J ,
    4. Simert G and
    5. Sjödahl R
    : Defunctioning stoma reduces symptomatic anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection of the rectum for cancer: a randomized multicenter trial. Ann Surg 246(2): 207-214, 2007. PMID: 17667498. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3180603024
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Daams F ,
    2. Wu Z ,
    3. Lahaye MJ ,
    4. Jeekel J and
    5. Lange JF
    : Prediction and diagnosis of colorectal anastomotic leakage: A systematic review of literature. World J Gastrointest Surg 6(2): 14-26, 2014. PMID: 24600507. DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v6.i2.14
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Matthiessen P ,
    2. Strand I ,
    3. Jansson K ,
    4. Törnquist C ,
    5. Andersson M ,
    6. Rutegård J and
    7. Norgren L
    : Is early detection of anastomotic leakage possible by intraperitoneal microdialysis and intraperitoneal cytokines after anterior resection of the rectum for cancer? Dis Colon Rectum 50(11): 1918-1927, 2007. PMID: 17763907. DOI: 10.1007/s10350-007-9023-4
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Reynolds IS ,
    2. Boland MR ,
    3. Reilly F ,
    4. Deasy A ,
    5. Majeed MH ,
    6. Deasy J ,
    7. Burke JP and
    8. McNamara DA
    : C-reactive protein as a predictor of anastomotic leak in the first week after anterior resection for rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 19(9): 812-818, 2017. PMID: 28273409. DOI: 10.1111/codi.13649
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Jansson K ,
    2. Jonsson T and
    3. Norgren L
    : Intraperitoneal microdialysis: A new method to monitor patients after abdominal surgery. Int J Intensive Care 10(1): 8-13, 2003.
    OpenUrl
    1. Jansson K ,
    2. Ungerstedt J ,
    3. Jonsson T ,
    4. Redler B ,
    5. Andersson M ,
    6. Ungerstedt U and
    7. Norgren L
    : Human intraperitoneal microdialysis: increased lactate/pyruvate ratio suggests early visceral ischaemia. A pilot study. Scand J Gastroenterol 38(9): 1007-1011, 2003. PMID: 14531543. DOI: 10.1080/00365520310004065
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Ellebæk M ,
    2. Qvist N ,
    3. Fristrup C and
    4. Mortensen MB
    : Mediastinal microdialysis in the diagnosis of early anastomotic leakage after resection for cancer of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction. Am J Surg 208(3): 397-405, 2014. PMID: 24656920. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.09.026
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Ellebaek Pedersen M ,
    2. Qvist N ,
    3. Bisgaard C ,
    4. Kelly U ,
    5. Bernhard A and
    6. Møller Pedersen S
    : Peritoneal microdialysis. Early diagnosis of anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection for rectosigmoid cancer. Scand J Surg 98(3): 148-154, 2009. PMID: 19919919. DOI: 10.1177/145749690909800304
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Jansson DT ,
    2. Oikonomakis I ,
    3. Strand IEU ,
    4. Meehan A and
    5. Jansson K
    : Metabolism, inflammation and postoperative time are the key to early diagnosis of anastomotic leak. J Surg Surg Res 5(2): 078-085, 2019. DOI: 10.17352/2455-2698.000078
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  5. ↵
    1. Oikonomakis I ,
    2. Jansson D ,
    3. Hörer TM ,
    4. Skoog P ,
    5. Nilsson KF and
    6. Jansson K
    : Results of postoperative microdialysis intraperitoneal and at the anastomosis in patients developing anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery. Scand J Gastroenterol 54(10): 1261-1268, 2019. PMID: 31630578. DOI: 10.1080/00365521.2019.1673476
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Jansson K ,
    2. Jansson M ,
    3. Andersson M ,
    4. Magnuson A ,
    5. Ungerstedt U and
    6. Norgren L
    : Normal values and differences between intraperitoneal and subcutaneous microdialysis in patients after non-complicated gastrointestinal surgery. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 65(4): 273-281, 2005. PMID: 16076682. DOI: 10.1080/00365510510013802
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. van Berge Henegouwen MI ,
    2. van der Poll T ,
    3. van Deventer SJ and
    4. Gouma DJ
    : Peritoneal cytokine release after elective gastrointestinal surgery and postoperative complications. Am J Surg 175(4): 311-316, 1998. PMID: 9568659. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9610(98)00010-5
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Jansson K ,
    2. Redler B ,
    3. Truedsson L ,
    4. Magnuson A ,
    5. Ungerstedt U and
    6. Norgren L
    : Postoperative on-line monitoring with intraperitoneal microdialysis is a sensitive clinical method for measuring increased anaerobic metabolism that correlates to the cytokine response. Scand J Gastroenterol 39(5): 434-439, 2004. PMID: 15180180. DOI: 10.1080/00365520310008548
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Tamion F ,
    2. Richard V ,
    3. Lyoumi S ,
    4. Daveau M ,
    5. Bonmarchand G ,
    6. Leroy J ,
    7. Thuillez C and
    8. Lebreton JP
    : Gut ischemia and mesenteric synthesis of inflammatory cytokines after hemorrhagic or endotoxic shock. Am J Physiol 273(2 Pt 1): G314-G321, 1997. PMID: 9277409. DOI: 10.1152/ajpgi.1997.273.2.G314
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Sammour T ,
    2. Singh PP ,
    3. Zargar-Shoshtari K ,
    4. Su’a B and
    5. Hill AG
    : Peritoneal cytokine levels can predict anastomotic leak on the first postoperative day. Dis Colon Rectum 59(6): 551-556, 2016. PMID: 27145313. DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000598
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Sparreboom CL ,
    2. Wu Z ,
    3. Dereci A ,
    4. Boersema GS ,
    5. Menon AG ,
    6. Ji J ,
    7. Kleinrensink GJ and
    8. Lange JF
    : Cytokines as early markers of colorectal anastomotic leakage: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2016: 3786418, 2016. PMID: 27051416. DOI: 10.1155/2016/3786418
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Yamamoto T ,
    2. Umegae S ,
    3. Matsumoto K and
    4. Saniabadi AR
    : Peritoneal cytokines as early markers of peritonitis following surgery for colorectal carcinoma: a prospective study. Cytokine 53(2): 239-242, 2011. PMID: 21075004. DOI: 10.1016/j.cyto.2010.10.006
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Alberts B
    : Molecular Biology of the Cell, Sixth Edition. New York, NY, Garland Science, Taylor and Francis Group, 2015.
  11. ↵
    1. Rissland OS
    : The organization and regulation of mRNA-protein complexes. Wiley Interdiscip Rev RNA 8(1): e1369, 2017. PMID: 27324829. DOI: 10.1002/wrna.1369
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Kurahashi I ,
    2. Fujita Y ,
    3. Arao T ,
    4. Kurata T ,
    5. Koh Y ,
    6. Sakai K ,
    7. Matsumoto K ,
    8. Tanioka M ,
    9. Takeda K ,
    10. Takiguchi Y ,
    11. Yamamoto N ,
    12. Tsuya A ,
    13. Matsubara N ,
    14. Mukai H ,
    15. Minami H ,
    16. Chayahara N ,
    17. Yamanaka Y ,
    18. Miwa K ,
    19. Takahashi S ,
    20. Takahashi S ,
    21. Nakagawa K and
    22. Nishio K
    : A microarray-based gene expression analysis to identify diagnostic biomarkers for unknown primary cancer. PLoS One 8(5): e63249, 2013. PMID: 23671674. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0063249
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Kerns R and
    2. Miles M
    : Microarray analysis of ethanol-induced changes in gene expression. Alcohol: 395-410, 2021. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-59745-242-7_26
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Block T ,
    2. Isaksson HS ,
    3. Acosta S ,
    4. Björck M ,
    5. Brodin D and
    6. Nilsson TK
    : Altered mRNA expression due to acute mesenteric ischaemia in a porcine model. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 41(2): 281-287, 2011. PMID: 21095140. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2010.09.012
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Chawla LS ,
    2. Toma I ,
    3. Davison D ,
    4. Vaziri K ,
    5. Lee J ,
    6. Lucas R ,
    7. Seneff MG ,
    8. Nyhan A and
    9. McCaffrey TA
    : Acute appendicitis: transcript profiling of blood identifies promising biomarkers and potential underlying processes. BMC Med Genomics 9(1): 40, 2016. PMID: 27417541. DOI: 10.1186/s12920-016-0200-y
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Rai MF ,
    2. Sandell LJ ,
    3. Zhang B ,
    4. Wright RW and
    5. Brophy RH
    : RNA microarray analysis of macroscopically normal articular cartilage from knees undergoing partial medial meniscectomy: Potential prediction of the risk for developing osteoarthritis. PLoS One 11(5): e0155373, 2016. PMID: 27171008. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155373
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Keen HL and
    2. Sigmund CD
    : Microarray analysis of hypertension. Methods Mol Biol 1527: 41-52, 2017. PMID: 28116705. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-6625-7_3
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Kilkenny C ,
    2. Browne WJ ,
    3. Cuthill IC ,
    4. Emerson M and
    5. Altman DG
    : Improving bioscience research reporting: the ARRIVE guidelines for reporting animal research. PLoS Biol 8(6): e1000412, 2010. PMID: 20613859. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000412
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Meyer A ,
    2. Paroni F ,
    3. Günther K ,
    4. Dharmadhikari G ,
    5. Ahrens W ,
    6. Kelm S and
    7. Maedler K
    : Evaluation of existing methods for human blood mRNA isolation and analysis for large studies. PLoS One 11(8): e0161778, 2016. PMID: 27575051. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0161778
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Alekseyev YO ,
    2. Fazeli R ,
    3. Yang S ,
    4. Basran R ,
    5. Maher T ,
    6. Miller NS and
    7. Remick D
    : A next-generation sequencing primer-how does it work and what can it do? Acad Pathol 5: 2374289518766521, 2018. PMID: 29761157. DOI: 10.1177/2374289518766521
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Harris MA ,
    2. Clark J ,
    3. Ireland A ,
    4. Lomax J ,
    5. Ashburner M ,
    6. Foulger R ,
    7. Eilbeck K ,
    8. Lewis S ,
    9. Marshall B ,
    10. Mungall C ,
    11. Richter J ,
    12. Rubin GM ,
    13. Blake JA ,
    14. Bult C ,
    15. Dolan M ,
    16. Drabkin H ,
    17. Eppig JT ,
    18. Hill DP ,
    19. Ni L ,
    20. Ringwald M ,
    21. Balakrishnan R ,
    22. Cherry JM ,
    23. Christie KR ,
    24. Costanzo MC ,
    25. Dwight SS ,
    26. Engel S ,
    27. Fisk DG ,
    28. Hirschman JE ,
    29. Hong EL ,
    30. Nash RS ,
    31. Sethuraman A ,
    32. Theesfeld CL ,
    33. Botstein D ,
    34. Dolinski K ,
    35. Feierbach B ,
    36. Berardini T ,
    37. Mundodi S ,
    38. Rhee SY ,
    39. Apweiler R ,
    40. Barrell D ,
    41. Camon E ,
    42. Dimmer E ,
    43. Lee V ,
    44. Chisholm R ,
    45. Gaudet P ,
    46. Kibbe W ,
    47. Kishore R ,
    48. Schwarz EM ,
    49. Sternberg P ,
    50. Gwinn M ,
    51. Hannick L ,
    52. Wortman J ,
    53. Berriman M ,
    54. Wood V ,
    55. de la Cruz N ,
    56. Tonellato P ,
    57. Jaiswal P ,
    58. Seigfried T ,
    59. White R and Gene Ontology Consortium
    : The Gene Ontology (GO) database and informatics resource. Nucleic Acids Res 32(Database issue): D258-D261, 2004. PMID: 14681407. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkh036
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. UniProt Consortium
    : UniProt: a worldwide hub of protein knowledge. Nucleic Acids Res 47(D1): D506-D515, 2019. PMID: 30395287. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gky1049
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Cheng CJ ,
    2. Sung CC ,
    3. Huang CL and
    4. Lin SH
    : Inward-rectifying potassium channelopathies: new insights into disorders of sodium and potassium homeostasis. Pediatr Nephrol 30(3): 373-383, 2015. PMID: 24899236. DOI: 10.1007/s00467-014-2764-0
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Maffei M ,
    2. Barone I ,
    3. Scabia G and
    4. Santini F
    : The multifaceted haptoglobin in the context of adipose tissue and metabolism. Endocr Rev 37(4): 403-416, 2016. PMID: 27337111. DOI: 10.1210/er.2016-1009
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Stumpf M ,
    2. Klinge U ,
    3. Wilms A ,
    4. Zabrocki R ,
    5. Rosch R ,
    6. Junge K ,
    7. Krones C and
    8. Schumpelick V
    : Changes of the extracellular matrix as a risk factor for anastomotic leakage after large bowel surgery. Surgery 137(2): 229-234, 2005. PMID: 15674206. DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2004.07.011
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Edomskis P ,
    2. Goudberg MR ,
    3. Sparreboom CL ,
    4. Menon AG ,
    5. Wolthuis AM ,
    6. D’Hoore A and
    7. Lange JF
    : Matrix metalloproteinase-9 in relation to patients with complications after colorectal surgery: a systematic review. Int J Colorectal Dis 36(1): 1-10, 2021. PMID: 32865714. DOI: 10.1007/s00384-020-03724-6
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Jaberi SA ,
    2. Cohen A ,
    3. D’Souza C ,
    4. Abdulrazzaq YM ,
    5. Ojha S ,
    6. Bastaki S and
    7. Adeghate EA
    : Lipocalin-2: Structure, function, distribution and role in metabolic disorders. Biomed Pharmacother 142: 112002, 2021. PMID: 34463264. DOI: 10.1016/j.biopha.2021.112002
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Sudan SK ,
    2. Deshmukh SK ,
    3. Poosarla T ,
    4. Holliday NP ,
    5. Dyess DL ,
    6. Singh AP and
    7. Singh S
    : Resistin: An inflammatory cytokine with multi-faceted roles in cancer. Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer 1874(2): 188419, 2020. PMID: 32822824. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2020.188419
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Donato R ,
    2. Cannon BR ,
    3. Sorci G ,
    4. Riuzzi F ,
    5. Hsu K ,
    6. Weber DJ and
    7. Geczy CL
    : Functions of S100 proteins. Curr Mol Med 13(1): 24-57, 2013. PMID: 22834835.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Qiu W ,
    2. Kuo CY ,
    3. Tian Y and
    4. Su GH
    : Dual roles of the activin signaling pathway in pancreatic cancer. Biomedicines 9(7): 821, 2021. PMID: 34356885. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines9070821
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research: 42 (6)
Anticancer Research
Vol. 42, Issue 6
June 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Altered mRNA Expression Due to Rectal Perforation in a Porcine Model – A Pilot Study
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
11 + 8 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Altered mRNA Expression Due to Rectal Perforation in a Porcine Model – A Pilot Study
IOANNIS OIKONOMAKIS, DAVID BRODIN, TAL M. HÖRER, PER SKOOG, JENNY SEILITZ, KRISTOFER F. NILSSON, ADRIAN D. MEEHAN, KJELL JANSSON
Anticancer Research Jun 2022, 42 (6) 2827-2833; DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.15764

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Altered mRNA Expression Due to Rectal Perforation in a Porcine Model – A Pilot Study
IOANNIS OIKONOMAKIS, DAVID BRODIN, TAL M. HÖRER, PER SKOOG, JENNY SEILITZ, KRISTOFER F. NILSSON, ADRIAN D. MEEHAN, KJELL JANSSON
Anticancer Research Jun 2022, 42 (6) 2827-2833; DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.15764
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Acknowledgements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • PTPN3 Could Βe a Therapeutic Target of Pancreatic Cancer
  • Murine Double Minute 2 Antagonist Nutlin-3 Enhanced Chemosensitivity in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
  • Potent Imidazothiazole-based Inhibitor of BRAF V600E Overcomes Acquired Resistance via Inhibition of RAF Dimerization in PLX4032-resistant Melanoma
Show more Experimental Studies

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Colorectal surgery
  • anastomotic leakage
  • gene expression analysis
  • microarray
Anticancer Research

© 2022 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire