Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues 2025
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues 2025
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleClinical Studies

Impact of the Use of Proton Pump Inhibitors on Pembrolizumab Effectiveness for Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma

IKKO TOMISAKI, MIRII HARADA, AKINORI MINATO, YUJIRO NAGATA, RIEKO KIMURO, KATSUYOSHI HIGASHIJIMA, KENICHI HARADA and NAOHIRO FUJIMOTO
Anticancer Research March 2022, 42 (3) 1629-1634; DOI: https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.15638
IKKO TOMISAKI
Department of Urology, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: ikko@med.uoeh-u.ac.jp
MIRII HARADA
Department of Urology, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
AKINORI MINATO
Department of Urology, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
YUJIRO NAGATA
Department of Urology, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
RIEKO KIMURO
Department of Urology, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
KATSUYOSHI HIGASHIJIMA
Department of Urology, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
KENICHI HARADA
Department of Urology, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
NAOHIRO FUJIMOTO
Department of Urology, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background/Aim: This study aimed to clarify the impact of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) on oncological outcomes in patients who received pembrolizumab for advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC). Patients and Methods: Forty advanced UC patients treated with pembrolizumab were retrospectively reviewed and divided into two groups (PPI: 15 patients; without PPI: 25 patients). Tumor response and survival were compared between these groups. The factors associated with survival were also investigated. Results: The objective response rate was significantly lower in the group with PPIs compared with the group without PPIs. Both progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were significantly shorter in the group with PPIs than in the group without PPIs. The use of PPIs was a significant predictor of poor PFS and OS in multivariate analysis. Conclusion: The use of PPIs was negatively associated with tumor response and survival in patients with advanced UC treated with pembrolizumab.

Key Words:
  • Proton pump inhibitors
  • urothelial carcinoma
  • gut microbiota
  • pembrolizumab
  • immune checkpoint inhibitors
  • antibiotics

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) greatly impact the management of patients with many malignancies including advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC) (1, 2). Pembrolizumab, an ICI that targets programmed cell death protein-1, demonstrated survival benefit in patients with advanced UC that had recurred or progressed after platinum-based chemotherapy (1). Recent guidelines for bladder or upper urinary tract cancer recommend pembrolizumab as second-line therapy for patients who previously received platinum-based combination chemotherapy. However, the median overall survival (OS) and objective response rate (ORR) were 10.1 months and 21.1%, respectively (3), and the oncological benefits of pembrolizumab were limited. Additionally, some patients experienced immune-related adverse events. Therefore, an unmet medical need to identify the biomarkers predicting pembrolizumab response was noted.

The gut microbiota plays an important role in immune function (4, 5), and comedications with putative immune-disrupting effect, such as antibiotics (ATBs) or proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), has recently emerged as a potential response predictor to ICIs for patients with advanced cancers (6-8). The impact of concomitant PPIs on therapeutic efficacy is still unclear in patients with advanced UC treated with pembrolizumab, although the use of ATBs was reported to be associated with worse outcomes (9). This study aimed to clarify the clinical significance of the use of PPI in patients who received pembrolizumab for advanced UC.

Patients and Methods

Patients. Consecutive patients with advanced UC who received pembrolizumab after the failure of at least one platinum-based chemotherapy in hospital of the University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Japan between March 2018 and March 2021 were retrospectively reviewed.

Study design and data collection. Clinical and laboratory data including the use of PPIs or ATBs were collected from the patients’ medical records. The use of PPIs is any administration within 60 and 30 days before and after initial pembrolizumab initiation was recorded, whereas the use of ATBs is any administration within 30 days before and after initial pembrolizumab initiation was recorded. Patients were categorized into two groups with or without PPIs use. Tumor response, progression-free survival (PFS), and OS between the groups were compared. The factors associated with PFS and OS were also investigated. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Japan (UOEHCRB21-074).

Treatment and follow-up examinations. Pembrolizumab was administered at a fixed dose of 200 or 400 mg every 3 or 6 weeks, respectively, and continued until disease progression or unacceptable adverse events. Chest and abdominal computed tomography (CT) scans were performed at baseline and every 2-3 months to evaluate the therapeutic effect. Tumor response was evaluated following the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor, version 1.1.

Statistical analysis. Patient characteristics were compared between the groups using Mann–Whitney U-test or Fisher’s exact test for continuous or nominal variables, respectively. Tumor responses between the groups were compared using Fisher’s exact test. PFS and OS were calculated from the first date of pembrolizumab therapy to the date of disease progression and the last follow-up or death from any cause, respectively. Survival curves were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Uni- and multivariate analyses were performed using the Cox proportional hazards regression model to identify the factors associated with PFS and OS. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed using EZR (Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, Saitama, Japan), which is a graphical user interface for R (The R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria) (10).

Results

Patient characteristics. Forty patients with advanced UC received pembrolizumab as sequential therapy after platinum-based chemotherapy during the study period. Patient characteristics, categorized by the use of PPIs, are summarized in Table I. Of the 40 patients, 15 and 25 patients were divided into the with and without PPIs groups, respectively. Patients in the group with PPIs were more likely to have low hemoglobin (<10 g/dl; 60% vs. 24%) and use of antibiotics history (60% vs. 12%) compared with the group without PPIs.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

Patient characteristics.

Tumor response. Four and one patient in the groups with and without PPIs, respectively, did not undergo any CT scans for evaluation of tumor response because of their clinical progression (e.g., fatigue or anorexia). The best responses in each group are shown in Figure 1. Of the 11 patients in the group with PPIs whose tumor responses were evaluated, complete response (CR) was not observed, and partial response (PR), stable disease (SD), and progressive disease (PD) were observed in one (9.1%), two (18.2%), and eight (72.7%), respectively. Of the 24 patients in the group without PPIs, CR, PR, SD, and PD were observed in one (4.2%), 15 (62.5%), two (8.3%), and six (25%), respectively. The ORR of the group with and without PPIs were 9.1% and 66.7%, respectively. A significant difference was noted between the two groups.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

The best responses of each group categorized by the use of PPIs.

Effects of PPIs on survival. Progression was observed in 29 patients during the median follow-up of 11.2 months (interquartile range=4.7-16.6 months); of these, six patients received subsequent therapy (gemcitabine-carboplatin, 3; paclitaxel-gemcitabine, 2; and etoposide-carboplatin, 1). Twenty-four patients expired of UC, and one patient expired of another cause during the follow-up period. In survival analyses, PFS was significantly shorter in the group with PPIs than in the group without PPIs [median, 2.1 months (95% confidence interval (CI)=1.3-7.4) vs. 15.2 months (95%CI=5.9-35.2); p=0.002]. OS was also significantly shorter in the group with PPIs than in the group without PPIs (median, 5.3 months (95%CI=2.4-15.7) vs. 25.8 months (95%CI=10.2-cannot be estimated); p<0.001) (Figure 2). In the multivariate analysis, the use of PPIs, liver metastases (presence), and duration from prior chemotherapy (<3 months) were significantly associated with poor OS (Table II) and PFS (Table III).

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Kaplan–Meier estimates of (A) progression-free survival and (B) overall survival in patients stratified by PPIs use.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table II.

Univariate and multivariate analysis to predict progression-free survival.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table III.

Univariate and multivariate analyses to predict overall survival.

Discussion

In this study, 15 (38%) of 40 eligible patients had a history of using PPIs. Lower ORR. shorter PFS and OS were observed in patients who used PPIs and received pembrolizumab for advanced UC compared with those who did not use PPIs. Additionally, the use of PPIs, liver metastases, and short duration (<3 months) from prior chemotherapy to pembrolizumab initiation were significant predictors of poor PFS and OS.

The gut microbiota has been recently reported to be associated with cancer immunity and response to cancer immunotherapy (4, 5, 11). Several studies reported that the use of ATBs (12, 13) or PPIs (14, 15) resulted in lower abundance in gut commensals and lower microbial diversity. Furthermore, a negative prognostic association between the use of ATB or PPIs and oncological outcomes in UC patients treated with atezolizumab, an ICI that targets programmed cell death protein-1 ligand-1, was noted in the clinical trials IMvigor210 and IMvigor211 (16, 17).

The current study demonstrated that the use of PPIs is associated with poor tumor response and survival outcomes in advanced UC patients treated with pembrolizumab. These results suggested that PPIs should be discontinued before pembrolizumab initiation and should not be prescribed during the pembrolizumab treatment period in patients with advanced UC. However, PPIs are commonly prescribed in patients with malignancies to manage or prevent gastrointestinal disorders. If discontinuation of anti-acid drug treatment is not acceptable, switching from PPIs to histamine-2 blockers (H2 blockers) may be one of the options because H2 blockers have been reported to influence less the gut microbiota compared to PPIs (12, 18, 19).

Although previous studies reported that the use of ATBs is a risk factor for oncological outcomes, it was not significantly associated with tumor response and survival in this study. Several studies showed that the use of PPIs caused more prominent changes in the microbiota than ATBs (12, 14). The use of PPIs might have a greater impact on oncological outcomes in patients treated with pembrolizumab for advanced UC compared with that of ATBs.

Several biomarkers including blood cell count markers such as neutrophile/lymphocyte ratio (20, 21), C-reactive protein (22, 23), or nutritional status-based markers (e.g., prognostic nutritional index) (24) have been identified in patients with advanced UC on pembrolizumab. Although these markers are useful in predicting the oncological pembrolizumab outcomes, they cannot be used to improve the therapeutic effect. Moreover, discontinuing or avoiding the prescription of PPIs may improve the therapeutic effect of pembrolizumab in patients with advanced UC. Therefore, the results of the current study may have great significance in the management of advanced UC.

This study has several limitations. First, the study had a small sample size, and the follow-up period was limited. The favorable ORR in patients who underwent pembrolizumab therapy was 48.9% in the current study compared with 21.1% in the KEYNOTE-045 study (1). Therefore, some biases may be included in the results of the current study because of its retrospective nature. Second, although some studies reported that other comedications, except for ATBs and PPIs, (e.g., corticosteroids, psychotropic drugs, or opioids) also alter the antitumoral effect of ICIs (7, 8), these drugs were not evaluated in this study. However, few patients took the drugs in the current study. Thus, they were excluded from the analysis.

In conclusion, the use of PPIs had a negative impact on tumor response and survival of patients with advanced UC treated with pembrolizumab. Administration of PPIs may be avoided during the pembrolizumab treatment period for advanced UC.

Footnotes

  • Authors’ Contributions

    Conceptualization: Ikko Tomisaki; Methodology: Ikko Tomisaki, Mirii Harada; Formal analysis and investigation: Ikko Tomisaki, Mirii Harada, Akinori Minato, Yujiro Nagata, Rieko Kimuro, Katsuyoshi Higashijima; Writing - original draft preparation: Ikko Tomisaki; Writing - review and editing: Kenichi Harada, Naohiro Fujimoto; Resources: Ikko Tomisaki; Supervision: Naohiro Fujimoto. All Authors read and approved the final manuscript.

  • Conflicts of Interest

    The Authors have no conflicts of interest in relation to this study.

  • Received December 23, 2021.
  • Revision received January 12, 2022.
  • Accepted January 13, 2022.
  • Copyright © 2022 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Bellmunt J,
    2. de Wit R,
    3. Vaughn DJ,
    4. Fradet Y,
    5. Lee JL,
    6. Fong L,
    7. Vogelzang NJ,
    8. Climent MA,
    9. Petrylak DP,
    10. Choueiri TK,
    11. Necchi A,
    12. Gerritsen W,
    13. Gurney H,
    14. Quinn DI,
    15. Culine S,
    16. Sternberg CN,
    17. Mai Y,
    18. Poehlein CH,
    19. Perini RF,
    20. Bajorin DF and KEYNOTE-045 Investigators
    : Pembrolizumab as second-line therapy for advanced urothelial carcinoma. N Engl J Med 376(11): 1015-1026, 2017. PMID: 28212060. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1613683
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Powles T,
    2. Park SH,
    3. Voog E,
    4. Caserta C,
    5. Valderrama BP,
    6. Gurney H,
    7. Kalofonos H,
    8. Radulović S,
    9. Demey W,
    10. Ullén A,
    11. Loriot Y,
    12. Sridhar SS,
    13. Tsuchiya N,
    14. Kopyltsov E,
    15. Sternberg CN,
    16. Bellmunt J,
    17. Aragon-Ching JB,
    18. Petrylak DP,
    19. Laliberte R,
    20. Wang J,
    21. Huang B,
    22. Davis C,
    23. Fowst C,
    24. Costa N,
    25. Blake-Haskins JA,
    26. di Pietro A and
    27. Grivas P
    : Avelumab maintenance therapy for advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma. N Engl J Med 383(13): 1218-1230, 2020. PMID: 32945632. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2002788
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Fradet Y,
    2. Bellmunt J,
    3. Vaughn DJ,
    4. Lee JL,
    5. Fong L,
    6. Vogelzang NJ,
    7. Climent MA,
    8. Petrylak DP,
    9. Choueiri TK,
    10. Necchi A,
    11. Gerritsen W,
    12. Gurney H,
    13. Quinn DI,
    14. Culine S,
    15. Sternberg CN,
    16. Nam K,
    17. Frenkl TL,
    18. Perini RF,
    19. de Wit R and
    20. Bajorin DF
    : Randomized phase III KEYNOTE-045 trial of pembrolizumab versus paclitaxel, docetaxel, or vinflunine in recurrent advanced urothelial cancer: results of >2 years of follow-up. Ann Oncol 30(6): 970-976, 2019. PMID: 31050707. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdz127
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Gopalakrishnan V,
    2. Helmink BA,
    3. Spencer CN,
    4. Reuben A and
    5. Wargo JA
    : The influence of the gut microbiome on cancer, immunity, and cancer immunotherapy. Cancer Cell 33(4): 570-580, 2018. PMID: 29634945. DOI: 10.1016/j.ccell.2018.03.015
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Zheng D,
    2. Liwinski T and
    3. Elinav E
    : Interaction between microbiota and immunity in health and disease. Cell Res 30(6): 492-506, 2020. PMID: 32433595. DOI: 10.1038/s41422-020-0332-7
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Chalabi M,
    2. Cardona A,
    3. Nagarkar DR,
    4. Dhawahir Scala A,
    5. Gandara DR,
    6. Rittmeyer A,
    7. Albert ML,
    8. Powles T,
    9. Kok M,
    10. Herrera FG and imCORE working group of early career investigators
    : Efficacy of chemotherapy and atezolizumab in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer receiving antibiotics and proton pump inhibitors: pooled post hoc analyses of the OAK and POPLAR trials. Ann Oncol 31(4): 525-531, 2020. PMID: 32115349. DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.01.006
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Cortellini A,
    2. Di Maio M,
    3. Nigro O,
    4. Leonetti A,
    5. Cortinovis DL,
    6. Aerts JG,
    7. Guaitoli G,
    8. Barbieri F,
    9. Giusti R,
    10. Ferrara MG,
    11. Bria E,
    12. D’Argento E,
    13. Grossi F,
    14. Rijavec E,
    15. Guida A,
    16. Berardi R,
    17. Torniai M,
    18. Sforza V,
    19. Genova C,
    20. Mazzoni F,
    21. Garassino MC,
    22. De Toma A,
    23. Signorelli D,
    24. Gelibter A,
    25. Siringo M,
    26. Marchetti P,
    27. Macerelli M,
    28. Rastelli F,
    29. Chiari R,
    30. Rocco D,
    31. Della Gravara L,
    32. Inno A,
    33. Michele T,
    34. Grassadonia A,
    35. Di Marino P,
    36. Mansueto G,
    37. Zoratto F,
    38. Filetti M,
    39. Santini D,
    40. Citarella F,
    41. Russano M,
    42. Cantini L,
    43. Tuzi A,
    44. Bordi P,
    45. Minuti G,
    46. Landi L,
    47. Ricciardi S,
    48. Migliorino MR,
    49. Passiglia F,
    50. Bironzo P,
    51. Metro G,
    52. Adamo V,
    53. Russo A,
    54. Spinelli GP,
    55. Banna GL,
    56. Friedlaender A,
    57. Addeo A,
    58. Cannita K,
    59. Ficorella C,
    60. Porzio G and
    61. Pinato DJ
    : Differential influence of antibiotic therapy and other medications on oncological outcomes of patients with non-small cell lung cancer treated with first-line pembrolizumab versus cytotoxic chemotherapy. J Immunother Cancer 9(4): e002421, 2021. PMID: 33827906. DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2021-002421
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Kostine M,
    2. Mauric E,
    3. Tison A,
    4. Barnetche T,
    5. Barre A,
    6. Nikolski M,
    7. Rouxel L,
    8. Dutriaux C,
    9. Dousset L,
    10. Prey S,
    11. Beylot-Barry M,
    12. Seneschal J,
    13. Veillon R,
    14. Vergnenegre C,
    15. Daste A,
    16. Domblides C,
    17. Sionneau B,
    18. Gross-Goupil M,
    19. Ravaud A,
    20. Forcade E,
    21. Schaeverbeke T and FHU ACRONIM
    : Baseline co-medications may alter the anti-tumoural effect of checkpoint inhibitors as well as the risk of immune-related adverse events. Eur J Cancer 157: 474-484, 2021. PMID: 34649118. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.08.036
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Ishiyama Y,
    2. Kondo T,
    3. Nemoto Y,
    4. Kobari Y,
    5. Ishihara H,
    6. Tachibana H,
    7. Yoshida K,
    8. Hashimoto Y,
    9. Takagi T,
    10. Iizuka J and
    11. Tanabe K
    : Antibiotic use and survival of patients receiving pembrolizumab for chemotherapy-resistant metastatic urothelial carcinoma. Urol Oncol 39(12): 834.e21-834.e28, 2021. PMID: 34284929. DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.05.033
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Kanda Y
    : Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software ‘EZR’ for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transplant 48(3): 452-458, 2013. PMID: 23208313. DOI: 10.1038/bmt.2012.244
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Iida N,
    2. Dzutsev A,
    3. Stewart CA,
    4. Smith L,
    5. Bouladoux N,
    6. Weingarten RA,
    7. Molina DA,
    8. Salcedo R,
    9. Back T,
    10. Cramer S,
    11. Dai RM,
    12. Kiu H,
    13. Cardone M,
    14. Naik S,
    15. Patri AK,
    16. Wang E,
    17. Marincola FM,
    18. Frank KM,
    19. Belkaid Y,
    20. Trinchieri G and
    21. Goldszmid RS
    : Commensal bacteria control cancer response to therapy by modulating the tumor microenvironment. Science 342(6161): 967-970, 2013. PMID: 24264989. DOI: 10.1126/science.1240527
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    1. Jackson MA,
    2. Verdi S,
    3. Maxan ME,
    4. Shin CM,
    5. Zierer J,
    6. Bowyer RCE,
    7. Martin T,
    8. Williams FMK,
    9. Menni C,
    10. Bell JT,
    11. Spector TD and
    12. Steves CJ
    : Gut microbiota associations with common diseases and prescription medications in a population-based cohort. Nat Commun 9(1): 2655, 2018. PMID: 29985401. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-05184-7
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Jakobsson HE,
    2. Jernberg C,
    3. Andersson AF,
    4. Sjölund-Karlsson M,
    5. Jansson JK and
    6. Engstrand L
    : Short-term antibiotic treatment has differing long-term impacts on the human throat and gut microbiome. PLoS One 5(3): e9836, 2010. PMID: 20352091. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009836
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Imhann F,
    2. Bonder MJ,
    3. Vich Vila A,
    4. Fu J,
    5. Mujagic Z,
    6. Vork L,
    7. Tigchelaar EF,
    8. Jankipersadsing SA,
    9. Cenit MC,
    10. Harmsen HJ,
    11. Dijkstra G,
    12. Franke L,
    13. Xavier RJ,
    14. Jonkers D,
    15. Wijmenga C,
    16. Weersma RK and
    17. Zhernakova A
    : Proton pump inhibitors affect the gut microbiome. Gut 65(5): 740-748, 2016. PMID: 26657899. DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-310376
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    1. Jackson MA,
    2. Goodrich JK,
    3. Maxan ME,
    4. Freedberg DE,
    5. Abrams JA,
    6. Poole AC,
    7. Sutter JL,
    8. Welter D,
    9. Ley RE,
    10. Bell JT,
    11. Spector TD and
    12. Steves CJ
    : Proton pump inhibitors alter the composition of the gut microbiota. Gut 65(5): 749-756, 2016. PMID: 26719299. DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-310861
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    1. Hopkins AM,
    2. Kichenadasse G,
    3. Karapetis CS,
    4. Rowland A and
    5. Sorich MJ
    : Concomitant antibiotic use and survival in urothelial carcinoma treated with atezolizumab. Eur Urol 78(4): 540-543, 2020. PMID: 32660748. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.06.061
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Hopkins AM,
    2. Kichenadasse G,
    3. Karapetis CS,
    4. Rowland A and
    5. Sorich MJ
    : Concomitant proton pump inhibitor use and survival in urothelial carcinoma treated with atezolizumab. Clin Cancer Res 26(20): 5487-5493, 2020. PMID: 32933995. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-1876
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    1. Lepczyńska M,
    2. Dzika E,
    3. Chen W and
    4. Lu CY
    : Influence of proton pump inhibitors and histamine receptor 2 antagonists on blastocystis ST3 and selected microorganisms of intestinal microbiota in vitro. Clin Transl Gastroenterol 12(4): e00325, 2021. PMID: 33835078. DOI: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000325
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Lin YT,
    2. Lin TY,
    3. Hung SC,
    4. Liu PY,
    5. Wu PH,
    6. Chuang YS,
    7. Hung WC,
    8. Chiu YW,
    9. Kuo MC and
    10. Wu CY
    : Anti-acid drug treatment induces changes in the gut microbiome composition of hemodialysis patients. Microorganisms 9(2): 286, 2021. PMID: 33573326. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms9020286
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Kadono Y,
    2. Kawaguchi S,
    3. Nohara T,
    4. Shigehara K,
    5. Izumi K,
    6. Kamijima T,
    7. Seto C,
    8. Takano A,
    9. Yotsuyanagi S,
    10. Nakagawa R,
    11. Miyagi T,
    12. Aoyama S,
    13. Asahi H,
    14. Fukuda R and
    15. Mizokami A
    : Blood cell count biomarkers predicting efficacy of pembrolizumab as second-line therapy for advanced urothelial carcinoma. Anticancer Res 41(3): 1599-1606, 2021. PMID: 33788755. DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.14921
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    1. Kobayashi T,
    2. Ito K,
    3. Kojima T,
    4. Kato M,
    5. Kanda S,
    6. Hatakeyama S,
    7. Matsui Y,
    8. Matsushita Y,
    9. Naito S,
    10. Shiga M,
    11. Miyake M,
    12. Muro Y,
    13. Nakanishi S,
    14. Kato Y,
    15. Shibuya T,
    16. Hayashi T,
    17. Yasumoto H,
    18. Yoshida T,
    19. Uemura M,
    20. Taoka R,
    21. Kamiyama M,
    22. Ogawa O,
    23. Kitamura H,
    24. Nishiyama H and Japan Urological Oncology Group
    : Risk stratification for the prognosis of patients with chemoresistant urothelial cancer treated with pembrolizumab. Cancer Sci 112(2): 760-773, 2021. PMID: 33283385. DOI: 10.1111/cas.14762
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Tomisaki I,
    2. Harada M,
    3. Tokutsu K,
    4. Minato A,
    5. Nagata Y,
    6. Kimuro R,
    7. Matsumoto M and
    8. Fujimoto N
    : Impact of C-reactive protein flare response in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma who received pembrolizumab. In Vivo 35(6): 3563-3568, 2021. PMID: 34697195. DOI: 10.21873/invivo.12659
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. ↵
    1. Yasuoka S,
    2. Yuasa T,
    3. Nishimura N,
    4. Ogawa M,
    5. Komai Y,
    6. Numao N,
    7. Yamamoto S,
    8. Kondo Y and
    9. Yonese J
    : Initial experience of pembrolizumab therapy in japanese patients with metastatic urothelial cancer. Anticancer Res 39(7): 3887-3892, 2019. PMID: 31262917. DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.13539
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    1. Ishiyama Y,
    2. Kondo T,
    3. Nemoto Y,
    4. Kobari Y,
    5. Ishihara H,
    6. Tachibana H,
    7. Yoshida K,
    8. Hashimoto Y,
    9. Takagi T,
    10. Iizuka J and
    11. Tanabe K
    : Predictive impact of prognostic nutritional index on pembrolizumab for metastatic urothelial carcinoma resistant to platinum-based chemotherapy. Anticancer Res 41(3): 1607-1614, 2021. PMID: 33788756. DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.14922
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research: 42 (3)
Anticancer Research
Vol. 42, Issue 3
March 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Impact of the Use of Proton Pump Inhibitors on Pembrolizumab Effectiveness for Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
13 + 2 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Impact of the Use of Proton Pump Inhibitors on Pembrolizumab Effectiveness for Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma
IKKO TOMISAKI, MIRII HARADA, AKINORI MINATO, YUJIRO NAGATA, RIEKO KIMURO, KATSUYOSHI HIGASHIJIMA, KENICHI HARADA, NAOHIRO FUJIMOTO
Anticancer Research Mar 2022, 42 (3) 1629-1634; DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.15638

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Impact of the Use of Proton Pump Inhibitors on Pembrolizumab Effectiveness for Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma
IKKO TOMISAKI, MIRII HARADA, AKINORI MINATO, YUJIRO NAGATA, RIEKO KIMURO, KATSUYOSHI HIGASHIJIMA, KENICHI HARADA, NAOHIRO FUJIMOTO
Anticancer Research Mar 2022, 42 (3) 1629-1634; DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.15638
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Patients and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Tumor Budding Grade and T Stage as Recurrence Predictors of High-risk Stage II Colorectal Cancer
  • Pathologic Complete Response (pCR) in Patient With Myxofibrosarcoma Who Underwent Neoadjuvant Radiation Concurrent to Complementary and Alternative Medicine
  • Machine Learning Model to Guide Empirical Antimicrobial Therapy in Febrile Neutropenic Patients With Hematologic Malignancies
Show more Clinical Studies

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • proton pump inhibitors
  • Urothelial carcinoma
  • gut microbiota
  • Pembrolizumab
  • immune checkpoint inhibitors
  • antibiotics
Anticancer Research

© 2025 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire