Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues 2025
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues 2025
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleClinical Studies

Clinical Significance of SEC11A Expression in Patients With Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer

HIDEAKI SUEMATSU, KENTARO SAKAMAKI, NAOHIDE OUE, YUKIHIKO HIROSHIMA, YAYOI KIMURA, SHIZUNE ONUMA, ITARU HASHIMOTO, SHINSUKE NAGASAWA, TORU AOYAMA, TAKANOBU YAMADA, HIROSHI TAMAGAWA, TAKASHI OGATA, YASUSHI RINO, MUNETAKA MASUDA, WATARU YASUI, YOHEI MIYAGI and TAKASHI OSHIMA
Anticancer Research December 2022, 42 (12) 5885-5890; DOI: https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.16097
HIDEAKI SUEMATSU
1Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama, Japan;
2Department of Surgery, Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
KENTARO SAKAMAKI
3Department of Data Science, Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
NAOHIDE OUE
4Department of Molecular Pathology, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
YUKIHIKO HIROSHIMA
5Kanagawa Cancer Center Research Institute, Yokohama, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
YAYOI KIMURA
6Advanced Medical Research Center, Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
SHIZUNE ONUMA
1Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama, Japan;
2Department of Surgery, Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
ITARU HASHIMOTO
1Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama, Japan;
2Department of Surgery, Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
SHINSUKE NAGASAWA
1Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama, Japan;
2Department of Surgery, Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
TORU AOYAMA
2Department of Surgery, Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
TAKANOBU YAMADA
1Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama, Japan;
2Department of Surgery, Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
HIROSHI TAMAGAWA
2Department of Surgery, Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
TAKASHI OGATA
1Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
YASUSHI RINO
2Department of Surgery, Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MUNETAKA MASUDA
2Department of Surgery, Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
WATARU YASUI
4Department of Molecular Pathology, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
YOHEI MIYAGI
5Kanagawa Cancer Center Research Institute, Yokohama, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
TAKASHI OSHIMA
1Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: oshimat@kcch.jp
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background/Aim: SEC11A gene encodes the SPC18 protein, which has been implicated in tumour progression by inducing the secretion of various growth factors. We investigated the clinical significance of SEC11A expression in gastric cancer (GC) tissues in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) after curative resection. Patients and Methods: We estimated SEC11A expression in cancer tissues from 253 pStage II/III GC patients who underwent curative resection using quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and investigated the relationship of SEC11A expression with clinicopathological factors and survival. Results: SEC11A expression was significantly related to serosal invasion, lymph node metastasis, lymphatic invasion, and pathological stage. The high-SEC11A expression group had a significantly lower survival rate than the low group (5-year survival 52.3% vs. 75.9%; p<0.005). Furthermore, in multivariate analysis, high-SEC11A expression was an independent factor of poor survival (hazard ratio, 2.010; 95% confidence interval=1.303-3.100; p=0.002). Conclusion: SEC11A expression in cancer tissue may be a useful prognostic marker in patients with LAGC after curative resection.

Key Words:
  • Gastric cancer
  • SEC11A
  • SPC18

Gastric cancer (GC) was ranked fifth in terms of incidence and fourth as a cause of death among all cancer types worldwide in 2020 (1). The standard treatment for locally advanced GC (LAGC) is curative resection followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. Despite advances in surgery and chemotherapy, the prognosis of GC is poor (2-6). Recently, genomic profiling has been performed in GC, which would promote personalised therapy. Biomarkers that predict survival and drug sensitivity (7-10) have been reported, and personalised therapy combining biomarkers is also attracting attention.

The SEC11A gene encodes the signal peptidase complex 18 (SPC18) protein, which is one of the subunits of the signal peptidase complex that induces the secretion of various growth factors, including transforming growth factor-α (TGF-α). TGF-α is an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) which is involved in cell proliferation and tumour progression pathways (11, 12). SEC11A and SPC18 have been implicated in the pathophysiology and prognosis of various carcinomas including GC (13-15). Therefore, SPC18 could be a potential biomarker in GC; however, the clinical significance of SEC11A gene expression in GC has not been fully elucidated.

Therefore, in this study, we investigated the clinical significance of SEC11A expression in GC tissues in patients with LAGC.

Patients and Methods

Patients and samples. This study was approved by the ethics committees of Kanagawa Cancer Center and Yokohama City University (approval numbers: epidemiological study-29 and 18-7A-4, respectively). Informed consent was obtained from all participants before recruitment. Among the patients who underwent curative resection for stage II/III gastric cancer at Kanagawa Cancer Center and Yokohama City University between 2002 and 2010, samples were collected from 253 individuals who consented to participate. Each tissue specimen was immediately sealed in an optimum cutting temperature compound (Sakura Fine Tech Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) and stored at −80°C. Tissue sections were prepared from frozen specimens and stained with eosin and haematoxylin for histopathologic evaluation. Tissue sections containing more than 80% cancer cells were used for RNA extraction.

Extraction of RNA and synthesis of complementary DNA (cDNA). Total RNA was extracted using TRIzol Reagent (Gibco, Grand Island, NY, USA) from frozen GC tissue and adjacent normal mucosa specimens. iScript cDNA Synthesis Kit (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) was used to synthesise cDNA from total RNA.

Quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). qRT-PCR was conducted using iQ SYBR Green Supermix (Bio-Rad). Oligonucleotide primers used for SEC11A were: sense primer 5′-TGAGTAAGAAGCCTGCCTTGC-3′, antisense primer 5′-TTCCACCAATCACAGACCAGTATC-3′. The internal control was β-actin, and the oligonucleotide primers used for β-actin were sense primer 5′-AGTTGCGTTACACCCTTTCTTGAC-3′ and antisense primer 5′-GCTCGCTCCAACCGACTGC-3′. PCR reactions were performed in a total volume of 15 μl consisting of 400 nM of each primer, 200 ng cDNA, 7.5 μl of iQ SYBR Green Supermix containing dCTP, dATP, dTTP, and dGTP at a concentration of 400 μM each, and 50 U/ml iTag DNA polymerase. The program for the reactions was set as follows: 95°C for 3 min, cDNA denaturation at 90°C for 10 s for SEC11A and 15 s for β-actin, annealing at 62°C for 10 s for SEC11A and 60°C for 15 min for β-actin mRNA, and primer extension for SEC11A at 72°C for 20 s and β-actin for 30 s, followed by 10 min hold at 72°C. Denaturation, annealing, and extension were performed for 40 cycles. Melting curves were analysed to distinguish specific from nonspecific products and primer dimers. To quantify the expression level of specific genes in the samples, a standard curve was generated for each run and the three points corresponding to the human control cDNA (Clontech Laboratories, Inc., Mountain View, CA, USA) were measured. The concentration of each sample was calculated from its intersection with the standard curve.

Statistical analyses. Statistical analyses were performed with EZR (Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, Saitama, Japan), a graphical user interface for R (The R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). Two-sided p-value <0.05 was regarded as statistically significant. SEC11A expression levels in GC tissue and adjacent normal mucosal tissue were compared using the Wilcoxon test. Associations between SEC11A expression levels and clinicopathological factors were analysed using the χ2 test. The relationship between SEC11A expression levels and overall survival (OS) was assessed by the Kaplan–Meier method and compared by the log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted using Cox proportional hazards models to determine prognostic risk factors.

Results

Comparison of SEC11A gene expression in GC tissue and adjacent normal mucosa. There was no significant difference between SEC11A expression in GC tissues and that in the adjacent normal gastric mucosa (p=0.060; Figure 1).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Comparison of SEC11A expression levels in gastric cancer tissues and normal adjacent gastric mucosa showed no significant difference (p=0.218).

Relationship between SEC11A gene expression levels in GC tissues and clinicopathological features in patients with LAGC. The relationship between SEC11A mRNA expression levels and clinicopathological features is shown in Table I. Patients with LAGC were divided into two groups: high-SEC11A and low-SEC11A expression groups based on the median SEC11A expression. The high-SEC11A group showed significantly higher serosal invasion, lymph node metastasis, lymphatic invasion, and pathologic stage progression than the low-SEC11A expression group.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

Characteristics of patients in the presence and absence of SEC11A expression.

Relationship between SEC11A gene expression and 5-year overall survival rate (5Y-OS) in GC tissues. The 5Y-OS of the high-SEC11A expression group in GC tissues was significantly poorer than that of the low expression group (52.3% vs. 75.9%, respectively; p<0.005; Figure 2).

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Kaplan–Meier survival curves showed that the 5-year overall-survival rate was 52.3% for patients in the high-SEC11A group and 75.9% for those in the low-SEC11A group (p<0.005).

Univariate and multivariate analysis of GC tissue SEC11A expression levels and clinicopathologic factors for overall survival (OS). Univariate analysis revealed that serosal invasion, lymph node metastasis, lymphatic invasion, and SEC11A expression were significant predictors of OS (Table II). On multivariate analysis, SEC11A mRNA expression was an independent predictor of OS (hazard ratio=2.010, 95% confidence interval=1.303-3.100, p=0.002: Table II).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table II.

Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards analyses of the clinicopathological factors for the overall survival.

Discussion

In this study, we investigated the clinical significance of SEC11A expression in GC tissue of patients with LAGC who underwent curative resection. In the study, high expression of SEC11A in GC tissue was significantly associated with poor 5 years-OS. Furthermore, high SEC11A expression was a predictive factor for poor OS.

Initially, we compared the expression of SEC11A in GC tissue with that of adjacent normal mucosa. It has been reported that SEC11A is highly expressed in cancer tissues compared to adjacent normal tissues in bladder cancer and head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (14, 15). In GC, SEC11A was also reported to be highly expressed in GC tissues compared to normal tissues (13, 16). However, in our results, there was no significant difference between SEC11A expression in GC tissues and that in the adjacent normal gastric mucosa.

Subsequently, we investigated the relationship between SEC11A expression and clinicopathological factors. In previous studies, it was reported that SEC11A expression was significantly associated with tumour (T), nodes (N), and metastases (M) (TNM) stage in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (15). SPC18 expression level has been implicated in histological classification, tumour depth, lymph node metastases, and TNM stage in GC (17). SPC18 expression has also been reported to be involved in tumour depth and TNM stage in oesophageal cancer (14), venous invasion, histological classification, tumour depth, lymph node metastases, and TNM stage in bladder cancer (18), and lymph node metastases and TNM stage in colorectal cancer (19). In our study, high SEC11A expression in GC tissue was associated with venous invasion, tumour depth, lymph node metastases, and TNM stage.

The mechanisms by which SEC11A affects survival in patients with LAGC who underwent curative resection remains unclear. Previous reports have indicated that SPC18 protein induces the secretion of various growth factors such as TGF-α, which are responsible for cancer progression (13, 18). TGF-α is involved in cell differentiation and proliferation (13, 17). These secreted proteins are synthesised as precursors with signal peptides at the amino terminus end and are cleaved by the signal peptidase complex (SPC) after translocation from the endoplasmic reticulum to the plasma membrane (20, 21). SPC has five distinct subunits among which SPC18 and SPC21 are postulated to have catalytic activity (22, 23). Growth factors such as TGF-α and EGF, whose secretion is induced by SPC18, phosphorylate EGFR and activate downstream signalling involving MEK/ERK and PI3K/Akt pathways (11, 12). This activation plays an important role in tumour cell proliferation, differentiation, angiogenesis, invasion, metastasis, and inhibition of apoptosis, and is involved in the progression of various tumour types (24, 25). Activation of MEK/ERK and PI3K/Akt pathways are associated with cancer progression including micrometastases of cancer cells (26-28), which could be involved in the mechanism by which SEC11A expression affects survival in patients with LAGC who underwent curative resection.

This study has several limitations. Firstly, to determine the clinical utility of the protein as a biomarker, both mRNA expression and protein expression must be examined in the same samples. In our study, we did not examine the protein expression of SPC18. Secondly, there is an issue of heterogeneity of cancer tissue. The samples from which mRNA was extracted were 5 mm2 × 30 μm of frozen tissues, including the deepest portion of the tumour, which might not fully represent the entire tumour.

In conclusion, SEC11A expression in GC tissue may be a useful prognostic marker for patients with LAGC after curative resection. Further research on SEC11A as a biomarker in GC may promote novel research on personalised medicine for the better management of patients with GC.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number JP20K08997.

Footnotes

  • Authors’ Contributions

    Concept and study design were conducted by HS, YH, YM, and TO. Data collection and literature search were performed by HS, SO, HI, SN, and TO. Data analysis and interpretation were performed by HS, YH, TA, YT, and TO. The manuscript and figures were drafted by HS and TO. Finally, the manuscript was revised and approved by all investigators. Thus, all the Authors actively participated in this study.

  • Conflicts of Interest

    The Authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding this study.

  • Received October 2, 2022.
  • Revision received October 5, 2022.
  • Accepted October 6, 2022.
  • Copyright © 2022 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Sung H,
    2. Ferlay J,
    3. Siegel RL,
    4. Laversanne M,
    5. Soerjomataram I,
    6. Jemal A and
    7. Bray F
    : Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 71(3): 209-249, 2021. PMID: 33538338. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21660
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Sasako M,
    2. Sakuramoto S,
    3. Katai H,
    4. Kinoshita T,
    5. Furukawa H,
    6. Yamaguchi T,
    7. Nashimoto A,
    8. Fujii M,
    9. Nakajima T and
    10. Ohashi Y
    : Five-year outcomes of a randomized phase III trial comparing adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 versus surgery alone in stage II or III gastric cancer. J Clin Oncol 29(33): 4387-4393, 2011. PMID: 22010012. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2011.36.5908
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Milano AF
    : 20-year comparative survival and mortality of cancer of the stomach by age, sex, race, stage, grade, cohort entry time-period, disease duration & selected ICD-O-3 oncologic phenotypes: a systematic review of 157,258 cases for diagnosis years 1973-2014: (SEER*Stat 8.3.4). J Insur Med 48(1): 5-23, 2019. PMID: 31609640. DOI: 10.17849/insm-48-1-1-19.1
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Yu J,
    2. Huang C,
    3. Sun Y,
    4. Su X,
    5. Cao H,
    6. Hu J,
    7. Wang K,
    8. Suo J,
    9. Tao K,
    10. He X,
    11. Wei H,
    12. Ying M,
    13. Hu W,
    14. Du X,
    15. Hu Y,
    16. Liu H,
    17. Zheng C,
    18. Li P,
    19. Xie J,
    20. Liu F,
    21. Li Z,
    22. Zhao G,
    23. Yang K,
    24. Liu C,
    25. Li H,
    26. Chen P,
    27. Ji J,
    28. Li G and Chinese Laparoscopic Gastrointestinal Surgery Study (CLASS) Group
    : Effect of laparoscopic vs open distal gastrectomy on 3-year disease-free survival in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer: The CLASS-01 randomized clinical trial. JAMA 321(20): 1983-1992, 2019. PMID: 31135850. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2019.5359
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Takahashi Y,
    2. Sunakawa Y,
    3. Inoue E,
    4. Kawabata R,
    5. Ishiguro A,
    6. Kito Y,
    7. Akamaru Y,
    8. Takahashi M,
    9. Yabusaki H,
    10. Matsuyama J,
    11. Makiyama A,
    12. Tsuda M,
    13. Suzuki T,
    14. Yasui H,
    15. Matoba R,
    16. Kawakami H,
    17. Nakajima TE,
    18. Muro K,
    19. Ichikawa W and
    20. Fujii M
    : Real-world effectiveness of nivolumab in advanced gastric cancer: the DELIVER trial (JACCRO GC-08). Gastric Cancer 25(1): 235-244, 2022. PMID: 34427838. DOI: 10.1007/s10120-021-01237-x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Noh SH,
    2. Park SR,
    3. Yang HK,
    4. Chung HC,
    5. Chung IJ,
    6. Kim SW,
    7. Kim HH,
    8. Choi JH,
    9. Kim HK,
    10. Yu W,
    11. Lee JI,
    12. Shin DB,
    13. Ji J,
    14. Chen JS,
    15. Lim Y,
    16. Ha S,
    17. Bang YJ and CLASSIC trial investigators
    : Adjuvant capecitabine plus oxaliplatin for gastric cancer after D2 gastrectomy (CLASSIC): 5-year follow-up of an open-label, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 15(12): 1389-1396, 2014. PMID: 25439693. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70473-5
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Ichikawa W,
    2. Terashima M,
    3. Ochiai A,
    4. Kitada K,
    5. Kurahashi I,
    6. Sakuramoto S,
    7. Katai H,
    8. Sano T,
    9. Imamura H and
    10. Sasako M
    : Impact of insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor and amphiregulin expression on survival in patients with stage II/III gastric cancer enrolled in the Adjuvant Chemotherapy Trial of S-1 for Gastric Cancer. Gastric Cancer 20(2): 263-273, 2017. PMID: 26884344. DOI: 10.1007/s10120-016-0600-x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Cheong JH,
    2. Yang HK,
    3. Kim H,
    4. Kim WH,
    5. Kim YW,
    6. Kook MC,
    7. Park YK,
    8. Kim HH,
    9. Lee HS,
    10. Lee KH,
    11. Gu MJ,
    12. Kim HY,
    13. Lee J,
    14. Choi SH,
    15. Hong S,
    16. Kim JW,
    17. Choi YY,
    18. Hyung WJ,
    19. Jang E,
    20. Kim H,
    21. Huh YM and
    22. Noh SH
    : Predictive test for chemotherapy response in resectable gastric cancer: a multi-cohort, retrospective analysis. Lancet Oncol 19(5): 629-638, 2018. PMID: 29567071. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30108-6
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Sundar R,
    2. Barr Kumarakulasinghe N,
    3. Huak Chan Y,
    4. Yoshida K,
    5. Yoshikawa T,
    6. Miyagi Y,
    7. Rino Y,
    8. Masuda M,
    9. Guan J,
    10. Sakamoto J,
    11. Tanaka S,
    12. Tan AL,
    13. Hoppe MM,
    14. Jeyasekharan AD,
    15. Ng CCY,
    16. De Simone M,
    17. Grabsch HI,
    18. Lee J,
    19. Oshima T,
    20. Tsuburaya A and
    21. Tan P
    : Machine-learning model derived gene signature predictive of paclitaxel survival benefit in gastric cancer: results from the randomised phase III SAMIT trial. Gut 71(4): 676-685, 2022. PMID: 33980610. DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2021-324060
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. Oshima T,
    2. Tsuburaya A,
    3. Yoshida K,
    4. Yoshikawa T,
    5. Miyagi Y,
    6. Rino Y,
    7. Masuda M,
    8. Guan J,
    9. Tan P,
    10. Grabsch HI,
    11. Sakamoto J and
    12. Tanaka S
    : Gastric cancer biomarker analysis in patients treated with different adjuvant chemotherapy regimens within SAMIT, a phase III randomized controlled trial. Sci Rep 12(1): 8509, 2022. PMID: 35595817. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-12439-3
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Derynck R
    : Transforming growth factor-alpha: structure and biological activities. J Cell Biochem 32(4): 293-304, 1986. PMID: 3543030. DOI: 10.1002/jcb.240320406
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Gangarosa LM,
    2. Dempsey PJ,
    3. Damstrup L,
    4. Barnard JA and
    5. Coffey RJ
    : Transforming growth factor-alpha. Baillieres Clin Gastroenterol 10(1): 49-63, 1996. PMID: 8732300. DOI: 10.1016/s0950-3528(96)90039-1
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Oue N,
    2. Naito Y,
    3. Hayashi T,
    4. Takigahira M,
    5. Kawano-Nagatsuma A,
    6. Sentani K,
    7. Sakamoto N,
    8. Zarni Oo H,
    9. Uraoka N,
    10. Yanagihara K,
    11. Ochiai A,
    12. Sasaki H and
    13. Yasui W
    : Signal peptidase complex 18, encoded by SEC11A, contributes to progression via TGF-α secretion in gastric cancer. Oncogene 33(30): 3918-3926, 2014. PMID: 23995782. DOI: 10.1038/onc.2013.364
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Shigematsu Y,
    2. Oue N,
    3. Sekino Y,
    4. Sakamoto N,
    5. Sentani K,
    6. Uraoka N,
    7. Hayashi T,
    8. Teishima J,
    9. Matsubara A and
    10. Yasui W
    : SEC11A expression is associated with basal-like bladder cancer and predicts patient survival. Pathobiology 86(4): 208-216, 2019. PMID: 31163419. DOI: 10.1159/000497206
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Hu C,
    2. Fan J,
    3. He G,
    4. Dong C,
    5. Zhou S and
    6. Zheng Y
    : Signal peptidase complex catalytic subunit SEC11A upregulation is a biomarker of poor prognosis in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. PLoS One 17(6): e0269166, 2022. PMID: 35653344. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269166
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Ren Z,
    2. Liu X,
    3. Si Y and
    4. Yang D
    : Long non-coding RNA DDX11-AS1 facilitates gastric cancer progression by regulating miR-873-5p/SPC18 axis. Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol 48(1): 572-583, 2020. PMID: 32054332. DOI: 10.1080/21691401.2020.1726937
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Yasui W,
    2. Oue N,
    3. Sentani K,
    4. Sakamoto N and
    5. Motoshita J
    : Transcriptome dissection of gastric cancer: identification of novel diagnostic and therapeutic targets from pathology specimens. Pathol Int 59(3): 121-136, 2009. PMID: 19261089. DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1827.2009.02329.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Hattori T,
    2. Sentani K,
    3. Naohide O,
    4. Sakamoto N and
    5. Yasui W
    : Clinicopathological significance of SPC18 in colorectal cancer: SPC18 participates in tumor progression. Cancer Sci 108(1): 143-150, 2017. PMID: 27859949. DOI: 10.1111/cas.13121
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Yamamoto Y,
    2. Oue N,
    3. Asai R,
    4. Katsuya N,
    5. Uraoka N,
    6. Sakamoto N,
    7. Sentani K,
    8. Tanabe K,
    9. Ohdan H and
    10. Yasui W
    : SPC18 expression is an independent prognostic indicator of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Pathobiology 87(4): 254-261, 2020. PMID: 32564026. DOI: 10.1159/000506956
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Nickel W and
    2. Rabouille C
    : Mechanisms of regulated unconventional protein secretion. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 10(2): 148-155, 2009. PMID: 19122676. DOI: 10.1038/nrm2617
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Greenburg G,
    2. Shelness GS and
    3. Blobel G
    : A subunit of mammalian signal peptidase is homologous to yeast SEC11 protein. J Biol Chem 264(27): 15762-15765, 1989. PMID: 2674115.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    1. Liang H,
    2. VanValkenburgh C,
    3. Chen X,
    4. Mullins C,
    5. Van Kaer L,
    6. Green N and
    7. Fang H
    : Genetic complementation in yeast reveals functional similarities between the catalytic subunits of mammalian signal peptidase complex. J Biol Chem 278(51): 50932-50939, 2003. PMID: 14559916. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M307542200
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    1. Shelness GS and
    2. Blobel G
    : Two subunits of the canine signal peptidase complex are homologous to yeast SEC11 protein. J Biol Chem 265(16): 9512-9519, 1990. PMID: 2188978.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    1. Lo HW,
    2. Hsu SC and
    3. Hung MC
    : EGFR signaling pathway in breast cancers: from traditional signal transduction to direct nuclear translocalization. Breast Cancer Res Treat 95(3): 211-218, 2006. PMID: 16261406. DOI: 10.1007/s10549-005-9011-0
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Seshacharyulu P,
    2. Ponnusamy MP,
    3. Haridas D,
    4. Jain M,
    5. Ganti AK and
    6. Batra SK
    : Targeting the EGFR signaling pathway in cancer therapy. Expert Opin Ther Targets 16(1): 15-31, 2012. PMID: 22239438. DOI: 10.1517/14728222.2011.648617
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Fattahi S,
    2. Amjadi-Moheb F,
    3. Tabaripour R,
    4. Ashrafi GH and
    5. Akhavan-Niaki H
    : PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling in gastric cancer: Epigenetics and beyond. Life Sci 262: 118513, 2020. PMID: 33011222. DOI: 10.1016/j.lfs.2020.118513
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Zhao Z,
    2. Zhu L,
    3. Xing Y and
    4. Zhang Z
    : Praja2 suppresses the growth of gastric cancer by ubiquitylation of KSR1 and inhibiting MEK-ERK signal pathways. Aging (Albany NY) 13(3): 3886-3897, 2021. PMID: 33461174. DOI: 10.18632/aging.202356
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Gonzalez-Hormazabal P,
    2. Musleh M,
    3. Bustamante M,
    4. Stambuk J,
    5. Pisano R,
    6. Valladares H,
    7. Lanzarini E,
    8. Chiong H,
    9. Rojas J,
    10. Suazo J,
    11. Castro VG,
    12. Jara L and
    13. Berger Z
    : Polymorphisms in RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK pathway are associated with gastric cancer. Genes (Basel) 10(1): 20, 2018. PMID: 30597917. DOI: 10.3390/genes10010020
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research: 42 (12)
Anticancer Research
Vol. 42, Issue 12
December 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Clinical Significance of SEC11A Expression in Patients With Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
6 + 3 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Clinical Significance of SEC11A Expression in Patients With Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer
HIDEAKI SUEMATSU, KENTARO SAKAMAKI, NAOHIDE OUE, YUKIHIKO HIROSHIMA, YAYOI KIMURA, SHIZUNE ONUMA, ITARU HASHIMOTO, SHINSUKE NAGASAWA, TORU AOYAMA, TAKANOBU YAMADA, HIROSHI TAMAGAWA, TAKASHI OGATA, YASUSHI RINO, MUNETAKA MASUDA, WATARU YASUI, YOHEI MIYAGI, TAKASHI OSHIMA
Anticancer Research Dec 2022, 42 (12) 5885-5890; DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.16097

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Clinical Significance of SEC11A Expression in Patients With Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer
HIDEAKI SUEMATSU, KENTARO SAKAMAKI, NAOHIDE OUE, YUKIHIKO HIROSHIMA, YAYOI KIMURA, SHIZUNE ONUMA, ITARU HASHIMOTO, SHINSUKE NAGASAWA, TORU AOYAMA, TAKANOBU YAMADA, HIROSHI TAMAGAWA, TAKASHI OGATA, YASUSHI RINO, MUNETAKA MASUDA, WATARU YASUI, YOHEI MIYAGI, TAKASHI OSHIMA
Anticancer Research Dec 2022, 42 (12) 5885-5890; DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.16097
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Patients and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Clinical Significance of HRNR Expression in Patients With Stage II/III Gastric Cancer After Curative Gastrectomy
  • Clinical Significance of Granzyme B Gene Expression in Pathological Stage II/III Gastric Cancer After Curative Gastrectomy
  • Clinical Significance of Tryptophanyl-tRNA Synthetase 1 Gene Expression in Patients With Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer
  • Clinical Significance of Chitinase-3-like Protein 1 Gene Expression in Patients With Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer
  • Asialoglycoprotein Receptor 2 Expression in Patients With Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer After Curative Resection
  • Clinical Significance of Pregnancy Zone Protein Expression in Patients With Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer After Curative Resection
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Comparison of BRCA2 Single Nucleotide Variants Between Japanese Patients With Familial Prostate Cancer, Sporadic Prostate Cancer, and Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
  • Corrigendum
  • Sex-related Survival Differences in Patients With Glioblastoma – Results From a Retrospective Analysis
Show more Clinical Studies

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • gastric cancer
  • SEC11A
  • SPC18
Anticancer Research

© 2025 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire