Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues 2025
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues 2025
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleClinical Studies
Open Access

Prognostic Role of Porphyromonas gingivalis Gingipain Rgp and Matrix Metalloproteinase 9 in Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

ANNA KAISA KYLMÄ, TIMO SORSA, LAURI JOUHI, HARRI K. MUSTONEN, HESHAM MOHAMED, REIJA RANDÉN-BRADY, ANTTI MÄKITIE, TIMO ATULA, JAANA HAGSTRÖM and CAJ HAGLUND
Anticancer Research November 2022, 42 (11) 5415-5430; DOI: https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.16046
ANNA KAISA KYLMÄ
1Department of Pathology, University of Helsinki, HUSLAB and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: anna.kylma@helsinki.fi
TIMO SORSA
2Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Diseases, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland;
3Division of Periodontology, Department of Dental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
LAURI JOUHI
4Department of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
HARRI K. MUSTONEN
5Department of Surgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland;
6Research Program in Systems Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
HESHAM MOHAMED
1Department of Pathology, University of Helsinki, HUSLAB and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland;
7Department of Histology, Faculty of Medicine, Omar Al-Mukhtar University, Al Bayda, Libya;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
REIJA RANDÉN-BRADY
1Department of Pathology, University of Helsinki, HUSLAB and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
ANTTI MÄKITIE
4Department of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland;
5Department of Surgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland;
8Division of Ear, Nose and Throat Diseases, Department of Clinical Sciences, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
TIMO ATULA
4Department of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
JAANA HAGSTRÖM
1Department of Pathology, University of Helsinki, HUSLAB and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland;
9Research Program in Translational Cancer Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland;
10Department of Oral Pathology and Radiology, Institute of Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
CAJ HAGLUND
5Department of Surgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland;
9Research Program in Translational Cancer Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background/Aim: The oral bacteria involved in the development of periodontitis alter the tissue conditions and modify immune responses in a way that may also influence tumor development. We investigated the prevalence of R gingipain (Rgp), a key virulence factor of the oral pathobiont Porphyromonas gingivalis, and the tissue-destructive enzymes matrix metalloproteinase 8 (MMP-8) and 9 (MMP-9) in 202 unselected consecutive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) samples. We further investigated the relationships between these factors and human papillomavirus (HPV) status, Treponema denticola chymotrypsin-like proteinase (Td-CTLP) immunoexpression, clinical parameters, and patient outcome. Patients and Methods: Clinicopathological data were derived from university hospital records. Rgp, MMP-8, and MMP-9 immunoexpression was evaluated by immunohistochemistry; the immunohistochemistry of Td-CTLP and HPV has been described earlier for this patient series. Cox regression analysis including death by causes other than OPSCC as a competing risk served to assess sub distribution hazard ratios. Results: In multivariable survival analysis, positive tumoral MMP-9 immunoexpression predicted poor prognosis among all patients [sub distribution hazard ratio (SHR)=2.4; confidence interval (CI)=1.2-4.4, p=0.008], and especially among those with HPV-negative OPSCC (SHR=3.5; CI=1.7-7.3, p=0.001). Positive immunoexpression of Rgp in inflammatory cells was associated with favorable outcome among all patients (SHR=0.5, CI=0.2-0.9, p=0.021) and among those with HPV-negative disease (SHR=0.4, CI=0.2-0.9, p=0.022). Conclusion: Our results suggest that tumoral MMP-9 may be related to poor outcome in OPSCC, especially in HPV-negative disease, while Rgp immunoexpression in inflammatory cells is associated here with better disease-specific survival (DSS).

Key Words:
  • Oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma
  • OPSCC
  • human papillomavirus
  • Porphyromonas gingivalis
  • gingipain
  • Rgp
  • matrix metalloproteinase
  • survival analysis

Microbial infection is estimated to play a role in nearly 20% of all malignancies (1). Since the acknowledgement of Helicobacter pylori as a causative agent of gastric cancer in 1994 (2), it has become more and more apparent that it is important to understand the role and the long-term effects of bacteria in order to develop better tools for cancer prevention.

The presence of several oral pathogens has been evident in oral and gastrointestinal tract cancers. The dysbiotic periodontal pathobiont Porphyromonas gingivalis (Pg) has occurred in abundance in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) (3), and further, Pg has been associated with an increased risk of mortality from orodigestive cancer (4), and with an increased incidence of pancreatic cancer (5). In esophageal cancer tissue, the oral pathogens Streptococcus mitis, Streptococcus anginosus, and Treponema denticola (Td) are frequent (6), and in our earlier studies, Td has appeared in oropharyngeal, oral- and gastrointestinal tumor samples (7, 8). In colorectal cancer, Fusobacterium nucleatum (Fn) has been present and evidence shows that it promotes colorectal carcinogenesis (9). Oral carcinogenesis has been promoted by Fn and Pg in in vitro and in vivo studies via their interaction with oral epithelial cells through toll-like receptors (TLR) (10). Pg is an invasive opportunistic pathobiont belonging to a red complex group of oral pathogens identifiable in severe forms of periodontitis (11). In addition to its association with gastrointestinal cancers, Pg has been associated with various systemic diseases including rheumatoid arthritis (12) and Alzheimer’s disease (13). The tumorigenic properties of Pg include induction of inflammation (14), activation of cell proliferation (15), inhibition of apoptosis (16), enhancement of cell invasion (17), epithelial mesenchymal transition (EMT) (18) and immune suppression (19). One of its key virulence factors, arginine-specific cysteine proteinase R gingipain (Rgp), has several functions: it can degrade host structural elements and thus contribute to Pg penetration into epithelium and to induction of cell apoptosis (20), as well as participate in altering host defenses by manipulating inflammatory responses (21). Pg activates host responses, leading to increased pro-matrix metalloproteinase 9 (proMMP-9) and proMMP-8 expression and activation (17, 22, 23), while gingipains activate proMMP-9 and proMMP-8 to their active form, thus enhancing extracellular matrix destruction and cell penetration (17, 24).

Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) derived from host cells are capable of degrading almost all components of extracellular matrix and basement membranes. MMPs are essential in many physiological processes requiring tissue remodeling such as angiogenesis, bone development, wound healing and uterine and mammary involution (25). They also play a critical role in inflammatory and immunological processes; upregulation of MMPs can occur in cancer, in vascular diseases, and in many types of inflammatory and immunological processes (26-29). Proteolytic degradation of ECM components by MMPs clearly facilitates carcinoma cell invasion and metastasis. Furthermore, MMPs play important roles in non-matrix bioactive chemokine- and growth-factor processes, and in the modulation of activities of other proteases in cascades (30-32). Interestingly, MMP-9 and MMP-8 have shown tumor-suppressive and defensive effects in breast, skin, and colitis-associated cancer, as well as epithelial-myoepithelial salivary gland and tongue cancer (33-36). With this background, we may assume that oral pathogens and MMPs may play a role in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC). Our aim was to determine the prevalence of R gingipain (Rgp), a key virulence factor of the oral pathogen Pg, and the prevalence of MMP-8 and 9 expression in 202 unselected consecutive OPSCC patients. We further aimed to discover their relationship to our earlier findings regarding HPV status, chymotrypsin-like proteinase of Td (Td-CTLP) immunoexpression, clinical parameters, and patient outcome.

Patients and Methods

Patients and clinicopathological data. The patient cohort originally comprised 331 consecutive patients with oropharyngeal cancer treated at the Helsinki University Hospital between 2000 and 2009, as previously described (37). The series fulfilling the inclusion criteria of this study comprised of 202 patients with treatment-naïve OPSCC treated with curative intention. Included were patients with squamous cell carcinomas (SCC) and subtypes of SCC with the following ICD-10 codes: C01, C02.4, C05.1, C05.2, C05.8, C05.9, C09.0, C09.1, C09.8, C09.9, C10.0, C10.2, C10.3, C10.8, and C10.9. Excluded from analysis were those patients with palliative intention of treatment (n=44), concurrent head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) (n=5), earlier treated HNSCC (n=11), histology other than SCC (n=18), or tumor-tissue unavailability (n=52).

The patient- and tumor characteristics of the patient cohort have been reported earlier (7, 37, 38), and appear in Table I as background information. The HPV status classification used here differs from our earlier reported results: earlier classification was based on HPV DNA result whereas our current classification combines results of p16INK4a(p16) and HPV mRNA assays as described in detail later in this chapter. Follow-up of all patients was at minimum three years or until death. Survival dates and causes of death came from Statistics Finland. The study received an approval of the Research Ethics Board of the Hospital District of Helsinki and Uusimaa, and an institutional research permission was granted.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

Patient and tumor characteristics stratified by human papillomavirus (HPV) status.

Of the 202 patients, 130 had undergone primary surgery. Among these, 116 received additionally either radiotherapy (RT) or chemoradiotherapy (CRT) as adjuvant oncological treatment. Among the 202 patients, 71 received definitive CRT or RT, and of these, 11 underwent additional surgery for residual disease (primary site: 1, neck only: 7, primary site and neck: 3). Tissue samples were collected before RT/CRT from all but two patients, in whom only post-treatment samples were available for immunohistochemistry.

The results on HPV DNA, HPV mRNA and p16 status were available from our earlier analysis (37, 39). HPV status of OPSCC was determined according to a classification method originally proposed by Smeets et al. (40) and later modified by our research group (39). The Smeets et al. classification method combines p16 and HPV DNA test results, whereas in our modified classification method, the HPV DNA result is replaced by the HPV mRNA result. We have previously shown that ISH for high-risk HPV E6/E7 mRNA is a highly specific and sensitive method for detecting HPV in OPSCC (39). The samples were divided into an HPV-positive group consisting of 108 tumors that included only p16-positive and HPV mRNA-positive samples. HPV-negative group included 94 either p16-positive but HPV mRNA-negative samples, or p16-negative and HPV mRNA-negative samples, or p16-negative but HPV mRNA-positive samples. Furthermore, data on Treponema denticola chymotrypsin-like protease (Td-CTLP) immunoexpression has appeared earlier (7).

Immunohistochemistry for gingipain and matrix metalloproteinases 8 and 9. We prepared tissue microarray (TMA) blocks and immunostained slides as described earlier (41). The immunohistochemical staining for Rgp was performed with polyclonal rabbit antibody for Porphyromonas gingivalis GingipainR1 (1: 800, Biorbyt Ltd., Cambridge, UK), with polyclonal rabbit anti-human MMP-8 (42, 43) for MMP-8, and with monoclonal mouse anti-human MMP-9 IgG (1:1000, IIA5, NeoMarkers Inc., Thermo Fisher Scientific, Cheshire, UK) for MMP-9.

Immunohistochemical scoring. The TMA slides immunostained with Rgp, MMP-8, and 9 antibody were scored by two researchers (J.H. and A.K.K.) separately, at that stage blinded to the clinical data. Any discordance in scoring was solved by reassessment in order to achieve consensus. Rgp and MMP-9 scoring in tumor tissue was based on intensity of positivity: none (0), mild (1), moderate (2), or strong (3). Rgp scoring in inflammatory cells and MMP-8 and MMP-9 scoring in neutrophils was assessed based on the number of positive cells as follows: negative (0), 1-20 positive cells (1), 20-100 positive cells (2) and >100 positive cells (3).

Statistical analysis. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 27.0 (IBM SPSS Statistics, IBM Corporation, New York, NY, USA), R version 4.0.3 (Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria) and STATA/MP (version 16.1, StataCorp LLC, College Station, TX, USA). Statistical differences between categorical variables were evaluated by Fisher’s exact test or the Fisher-Freeman-Halton exact test, and between ordinal variables using the Linear-by-linear association test. The measure of association between ordinal variables was evaluated by Spearman correlation coefficients with 95% confidence limits. Correlations with Spearman rho value below and equal to 0.3 were regarded as negligible.

The Cox proportional hazards model served in univariable and multivariable survival analysis. In the analysis, a competing event with death by OPSCC was death by other cause, and sub distribution hazard ratios (SHR) were calculated. The Cox regression assumption of constant hazard ratios over time was assessed with the Schoenfeld residuals plotted over time, as well as testing for trend. No significant deviations from the assumption were observed.

The disease-specific survival (DSS) was presented with cumulative incidence function (cumulative death rates over time) in Aalen-Johansen plots considering the other unrelated deaths to OPSCC. Grey’s test served for statistical significance between the categories. The follow-up time in the DSS evaluation was defined as the period between the last treatment day and the last day of follow-up or date of death from the disease.

Results

Rgp, MMP-8 and MMP-9 were immunoexpressed in OPSCC and inflammatory cells. The immunoexpression of Rgp was cytoplasmic in carcinoma cells (Figure 1A). In addition, Rgp immunopositivity was detectable in endothelial cells, neutrophils, and lymphocytes. Rgp-immunopositive inflammatory cells were present in the stroma only. We scored Rgp immunopositivity both in carcinoma cells and in inflammatory cells. Of the 193 samples available for Rgp staining, Rgp was immunoexpressed in tumor cells in 155 (80%), and in inflammatory cells in 137 (71%) (Table II).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Immunohistochemical staining of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) samples with R gingipain (Rgp) antibody specific to Porphyroromonas gingivalis (Pg), matrix metalloproteinase 8 (MMP-8) antibody and 9 (MMP-9) antibody. OPSCC with positive immunoexpression of Rgp in tumor and inflammatory cells of stroma (A), MMP-8 expression in inflammatory cells of stroma (B) and inflammatory cells infiltrating the tumor (C), MMP-9 expression in tumor cells (D), inflammatory cells infiltrating the tumor (E), and inflammatory cells of stroma (F). Arrowheads indicate tumor tissue, and arrows indicate inflammatory cells. Scale bar length, 100 μm. Magnification, ×400.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table II.

Biomarker associations among 202 consecutive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) patients stratified according to human papillomavirus (HPV) status.

The MMP-8 immunopositivity was negative in tumor cells and detectable only in neutrophils within and surrounding the tumor; we scored it separately for each location (Figure 1B and C). MMP-8 immunoexpression occurred in tumor neutrophils in 63% (125 of 196) of the tumor samples available for MMP-8 staining, and in stroma neutrophils in 93% (185 of 198) of the stroma samples available for MMP-8 staining (Table II).

The immunoexpression of MMP-9 was cytoplasmic in carcinoma cells (Figure 1D). In addition, MMP-9 immunopositivity was detectable in neutrophils within the carcinoma and in the surrounding stroma (Figure 1E and F). We scored Rgp immunopositivity both in carcinoma cells and in inflammatory cells, the latter including both tumoral and stromal neutrophils. MMP-9 was immunoexpressed, among 198 samples available for MMP-9 staining, in tumor cells in 30 (15%), and in neutrophils in 182 (92%) (Table II).

Neither Rgp, MMP-8, nor MMP-9 showed any correlation exceeding our arbitrary limit for low correlations (correlation coefficient, rho >0.3) with patient or tumor characteristics (data not shown).

Rgp, MMP-8 and MMP-9 showed low correlation with HPV status of OPSCC. Rgp in tumor cells, MMP-8 in tumor neutrophils and MMP-9 in neutrophils correlated with tumor HPV status, albeit the correlation was low (Table III). In HPV-positive disease, mild immunoexpression of Rgp in tumor cells was more common, whereas in HPV-negative disease, strong immunoexpression dominated. A similar trend applied for MMP-8 in tumor neutrophils and MMP-9 in neutrophils (Table II). Neither Rgp, MMP-8, nor MMP-9 showed any correlation exceeding our arbitrary limit for low correlations (correlation coefficient, rho >0.3) with Td-CTLP (Table III).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table III.

Biomarker correlations among 202 consecutive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) patients.

Among biomarkers Rgp, MMP-8 and MMP-9, several statistically significant correlations did emerge. The biomarker correlations among all patients and among HPV-positive disease group were similar (Table III and Table IV). HPV-negative disease group differed from these in respect of tumoral Rgp correlations: tumoral Rgp correlated with tumoral MMP-9 (rho=0.315; p=0.003), and not with Rgp in inflammatory cells (Table V).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table IV.

Biomarker correlations among 108 human papillomavirus (HPV) positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) patients.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table V.

Biomarker correlations among 94 human papillomavirus (HPV) negative oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) patients.

Tumor MMP-9 and Rgp in inflammatory cells were risk factors for survival. In survival analysis, we evaluated the score groups separately and dichotomized into the categories presented in Table VI and Table VII. In univariable survival analysis of all 202 patients, tumoral MMP-9 presented as a risk factor for poor DSS when we included death by cause other than OPSCC as a competing factor in the Cox proportional hazard model. Univariable analysis showed Rgp in tumor cells or inflammatory cells, MMP-8 in tumor or in stroma neutrophils, and MMP-9 in neutrophils to remain statistically non-significant factors.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table VI.

Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analysis for Disease-Specific survival (DSS) in a series of all 202 oropharyngeal squamous-cell-carcinoma (OPSCC) patients. Death by cause other than OPSCC is included in the analysis as a competing factor.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table VII.

Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analysis for Disease-Specific survival (DSS) among 94 human papillomavirus (HPV) negative oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) patients. Death by cause other than OPSCC is included in analysis as a competing factor.

In multivariable analysis adjusted for known patient and tumor characteristics, and for available biomarkers, in addition to tumoral MMP-9, Rgp in inflammatory cells influenced the DSS (p=0.008 and 0.021, respectively). Tumoral MMP-9 worsened the DSS (SHR=2.4) and Rgp in inflammatory cells improved it (HR=0.5) (Table VI, Figure 2).

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

The disease specific cumulative incidence (cumulative death rates over time) presented as Aalen-Johansen plots. Deaths from causes other than OPSCC were included in the analysis but are not shown in the figure for simplicity. In total there were 26 (16 in HPV-negative group) deaths unrelated to OPSCC. The cumulative incidence function did not statistically differ between the groups for deaths unrelated to OPSCC. Gray’s test assessed differences between groups; R gingipain (Rgp) in inflammatory cells, tumoral matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP-9), and combination (tumoral MMP-9 and Rgp in inflammatory cells) among all patients and among HPV-negative oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) patients. Tumoral MMP-9 among all patients (A), and in HPV-negative disease (B), Rgp in inflammatory cells among all patients (C), and in HPV-negative disease (D), and combination of tumoral MMP-9 and Rgp in inflammatory cells among all patients (E) and in HPV-negative disease (F).

Tumor MMP-9 in combination with Rgp in inflammatory cells as a prognostic factor. Further, we investigated whether the combination of tumoral MMP-9 and Rgp in inflammatory cells would provide additional characterization of the patients. This combination included three categories: positive tumoral MMP-9 (scores 1-3) combined with any immunoexpression of Rgp in inflammatory cells (scores 0-3); negative tumoral MMP-9 (score 0) combined with low immunoexpression of Rgp in inflammatory cells (scores 0-1); and negative tumoral MMP-9 (score 0) combined with high immunoexpression of Rgp in inflammatory cells (scores 2-3). Indeed, the group with high Rgb in their inflammatory cells and negative tumoral MMP-9 seemed to show better survival than did patients with other combinations (Table VI, Figure 2).

Survival in the HPV-negative subgroup. Among HPV-negative OPSCC patients, tumoral MMP-9, Rgp in inflammatory cells, and their combination emerged in univariable analysis as significant factors affecting the DSS (Table VII) in a similar fashion as they did among all patients. In multivariable analysis adjusted for known patient- and tumor characteristics, MMP-9 in neutrophils additionally worsened the DSS (Table VII).

Survival in the HPV-positive subgroup. In univariable analysis of HPV-positive OPSCC, risk factors for poor DSS were high age and low tumor grade, as previously reported (37, 44). Neither Rgp, MMP-8, nor MMP-9 showed any statistical significance regarding DSS (data not shown).

Discussion

Here, we show the occurrence of Rgp—a key virulence factor specific to the oral pathobiont Pg—in both HPV-positive and HPV-negative OPSCC. Tumoral Rgp and tumoral MMP-9 correlated positively in HPV-negative OPSCC, but no correlation existed in HPV-positive OPSCC. Our results suggest that, in OPSCC, tumoral MMP-9 may be related to poor outcome, especially in HPV-negative disease, whereas among these same groups, Rgp in inflammatory cells improves the DSS.

We found cytoplasmic Rgp immunoexpression in OPSCC cells, whereas Gao et al. additionally detected anti-Pg and anti-lysine gingipain (Kgp) in cell nuclei, in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) (45). This may reflect differences between these cancers or between the antibodies used. In our patients, Rgp was also present in inflammatory cells in the tumor stroma and infiltrating the tumor. In periodontal tissue, Pg frequently co-exists with Td (11). This is apparent also in our patient cohort, because we earlier detected Td-specific Td-CTLP immunoexpression in the same OPSCC samples (7). No statistically significant correlation with tumoral Rgp and Td-CTLP was, however, present in our current study.

Pg can invade oral epithelial and endothelial cells and induce proinflammatory cytokine- and MMP production, as well as proMMP and plasminogen activation (24, 46). This can eventually promote tumorigenic microenvironment modifications of the cellular environment both intra- and extracellularly. Accordingly, in our patient samples, we detected Rgp in the OPSCC cytoplasm and endothelial cells. Based on our studies, it is impossible, however, to assess whether host-cell invasion of Pg occurred, or whether this occurred before or after these cells’ malignant transformation.

We detected MMP-9 in tumor tissue in 15% of the OPSCCs, and in neutrophils in 92% of the OPSCCs; this was evident in both HPV-positive and negative disease. Earlier, elevated MMP-9 expression have been detected in oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma (OTSCC) (47), and in OSCC (48). Interestingly, elevated levels of MMP-9 in serum (49) and in saliva (50, 51) have been associated with OSCC. Furthermore, overexpression of MMP-9 has been evident in Pg-infected human oral epithelial cells, human gingival keratinocytes (52, 53), murine model cells (10, 54) and OSCC cell lines (17, 55). We observed a statistically significant low positive correlation between tumoral MMP-9 and tumoral Rgp in HPV-negative OPSCC, but this correlation was negligible (rho<0.3) in the whole patient cohort, and in HPV-positive disease. Rgp showed no statistically significant correlation with MMP-9 in neutrophils.

We earlier showed Td-CTLP to be present in oropharyngeal and orodigestive tumor tissues, and in in vitro conversion of proMMP-8 and −9 to their active forms by Td-CTLP (7, 8). Although in our current patient cohort, we did not find statistically significant correlation between Td-CTLP and MMP-9 in tumor cells or in inflammatory cells, Td-CTLP, among other factors, may not be ruled out as having some influence on MMP-9 expression.

In survival analysis, tumoral MMP-9 was an independent prognostic factor for poor DSS in OPSCC among all patients and in those with HPV-negative disease, which is in line with the reported MMP-9 association with poor prognosis in OTSCC (56), gastric cancer (57), breast cancer (58), colorectal cancer (59), and non-small cell lung cancer (60). Our result supports the idea that the carcinogenesis in HPV-negative OPSCC resembles more that of the OSCC, and it is different from virus-driven carcinogenesis of HPV-positive disease, in regard to the involvement of MMP-9. Evidence differs, however, as to MMP-9 acting as a suppressor in cancer: Bendrik et al. (33) evidenced that overexpression of MMP-9 caused tumor regression and decreased angiogenesis in murine model and Luukkaa et al. (35) detected higher MMP-9 index to predict better survival in vitro in epithelial-myoepithelial salivary gland cancer. In colitis associated cancer, MMP-9 played a protective role as evidenced in vivo using MMP-9 knock-out mice and in vitro enterocyte cell line (34).

Tumoral Rgp immunoexpression did not reach statistical significance (p=0.054) as an independent prognostic factor for DSS in our patient cohort. This differs from the findings of Ahn et al. (4) revealing Pg as being a prognostic marker for survival in orodigestive cancer independent of periodontitis, and Gao et al. (45) reporting a positive correlation between Pg infection and overall survival rate in ESCC.

Rgp immunoreactivity in inflammatory cells, however, played a prognostic role among all patients in a multivariable setting and in HPV-negative disease both in univariable and multivariable settings. Interestingly, Rgp in inflammatory cells seemed to improve prognosis. This may be explained by phagocytosis of Pg, and as such a manifestation of an efficient immune-response, or by some Pg-induced defensive inflammatory response in the tumor microenvironment promoting, at least to some degree, tumor suppression. As with tumor MMP-9, Rgp in inflammatory cells was not a statistically significant prognostic factor in HPV-positive OPSCC. This may be due to low event rate in HPV-positive tumors, or may account to the differences in etiology, and therefore, in carcinogenesis of the HPV-positive and negative OPSCC. The results of survival analysis additionally confirmed our earlier reported factors, HPV status and Td-CTLP, as risk factors when a competing factor was included in the model.

As a limitation to our study, we collected data retrospectively on non-randomized patients, making our results susceptible to unknown biases. The patient cohort included a consecutive series of all OPSCC patients treated over a 10-year period with curative intent at our institute. The patient history available was limited, especially regarding details on smoking and alcohol abuse.

In our survival analysis, we did, however, include combinations of biomarkers to provide further insight to our observations. We also used sub distribution hazard ratios and the cumulative incidence function, methods appropriate for prognostic studies, to account for the bias caused by deaths unrelated to OPSCC, as these accounted for approximately 35% of all deaths encountered, precluding the occurrence of OPSSC related deaths. In survival analysis, we observed, that for the combination factor of tumor MMP-9 and Rgb in inflammatory cells, the MMP-9 component of the combination impaired prognosis, but the inflammatory-cell Rgp component of the same combination improved it. Examined altogether, this combination supports our observations concerning separate biomarkers, as well as earlier findings by other researchers (45, 61), as to the role of MMP-9 in impaired prognosis.

The possible role of Rgp in carcinogenesis of OPSCC may be speculated upon, because at least two mechanisms seem possible: a tumorigenic role as a promoter and activator of MMP-9, and an anti-tumorigenic role as a promoter of inflammatory-cell response tumor-suppressive properties. Regardless, considering our limited sample size, we must avoid strong conclusions concerning survival results.

Conclusion

In short, Rgp was present in both HPV-positive and HPV-negative OPSCC. A positive correlation existed between tumoral Rgp and tumoral MMP-9 in HPV-negative OPSCC, but not in HPV-positive OPSCC. Tumoral MMP-9 may be related to poor DSS in OPSCC, especially among patients with HPV-negative disease, whereas Rgp in inflammatory cells improved DSS in these same groups. The role of Rgp in immunological responses, in carcinogenesis, and in clinical outcome requires further investigation both in HPV-negative and HPV-positive OPSCC.

Acknowledgements

We thank Pia Saarinen for technical assistance.

Footnotes

  • ↵* These Authors contributed equally to this study.

  • Authors’ Contributions

    JH, TS, CH, TA, AM, LJ, HM, and AKK designed the study; AKK, HM, LJ, HKM, RR-B and TA acquired and analyzed the data; all Authors participated in interpretation of the results, drafting, and revision of the manuscript, and in the decision to submit.

  • Conflicts of Interest

    The Authors declare no conflicts of interest.

  • Received August 15, 2022.
  • Revision received September 6, 2022.
  • Accepted September 8, 2022.
  • Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by the International Institute of Anticancer Research.

This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 international license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0).

References

  1. ↵
    1. Parkin DM
    : The global health burden of infection-associated cancers in the year 2002. Int J Cancer 118(12): 3030-3044, 2006. PMID: 16404738. DOI: 10.1002/ijc.21731
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    Schistosomes, liver flukes and Helicobacter pylori. IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. Lyon, 7-14 June 1994. IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum 61: 1-241, 1994. PMID: 7715068.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Katz J,
    2. Onate MD,
    3. Pauley KM,
    4. Bhattacharyya I and
    5. Cha S
    : Presence of Porphyromonas gingivalis in gingival squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Oral Sci 3(4): 209-215, 2011. PMID: 22010579. DOI: 10.4248/IJOS11075
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Ahn J,
    2. Segers S and
    3. Hayes RB
    : Periodontal disease, Porphyromonas gingivalis serum antibody levels and orodigestive cancer mortality. Carcinogenesis 33(5): 1055-1058, 2012. PMID: 22367402. DOI: 10.1093/carcin/bgs112
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Michaud DS,
    2. Izard J,
    3. Wilhelm-Benartzi CS,
    4. You DH,
    5. Grote VA,
    6. Tjønneland A,
    7. Dahm CC,
    8. Overvad K,
    9. Jenab M,
    10. Fedirko V,
    11. Boutron-Ruault MC,
    12. Clavel-Chapelon F,
    13. Racine A,
    14. Kaaks R,
    15. Boeing H,
    16. Foerster J,
    17. Trichopoulou A,
    18. Lagiou P,
    19. Trichopoulos D,
    20. Sacerdote C,
    21. Sieri S,
    22. Palli D,
    23. Tumino R,
    24. Panico S,
    25. Siersema PD,
    26. Peeters PH,
    27. Lund E,
    28. Barricarte A,
    29. Huerta JM,
    30. Molina-Montes E,
    31. Dorronsoro M,
    32. Quirós JR,
    33. Duell EJ,
    34. Ye W,
    35. Sund M,
    36. Lindkvist B,
    37. Johansen D,
    38. Khaw KT,
    39. Wareham N,
    40. Travis RC,
    41. Vineis P,
    42. Bueno-de-Mesquita HB and
    43. Riboli E
    : Plasma antibodies to oral bacteria and risk of pancreatic cancer in a large European prospective cohort study. Gut 62(12): 1764-1770, 2013. PMID: 22990306. DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2012-303006
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    1. Narikiyo M,
    2. Tanabe C,
    3. Yamada Y,
    4. Igaki H,
    5. Tachimori Y,
    6. Kato H,
    7. Muto M,
    8. Montesano R,
    9. Sakamoto H,
    10. Nakajima Y and
    11. Sasaki H
    : Frequent and preferential infection of Treponema denticola, Streptococcus mitis, and Streptococcus anginosus in esophageal cancers. Cancer Sci 95(7): 569-574, 2004. PMID: 15245592. DOI: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2004.tb02488.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Kylmä AK,
    2. Jouhi L,
    3. Listyarifah D,
    4. Mohamed H,
    5. Mäkitie A,
    6. Remes SM,
    7. Haglund C,
    8. Atula T,
    9. Nieminen MT,
    10. Sorsa T and
    11. Hagström J
    : Treponema denticola chymotrypsin-like protease as associated with HPV-negative oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Br J Cancer 119(1): 89-95, 2018. PMID: 29930251. DOI: 10.1038/s41416-018-0143-5
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Nieminen MT,
    2. Listyarifah D,
    3. Hagström J,
    4. Haglund C,
    5. Grenier D,
    6. Nordström D,
    7. Uitto VJ,
    8. Hernandez M,
    9. Yucel-Lindberg T,
    10. Tervahartiala T,
    11. Ainola M and
    12. Sorsa T
    : Treponema denticola chymotrypsin-like proteinase may contribute to orodigestive carcinogenesis through immunomodulation. Br J Cancer 118(3): 428-434, 2018. PMID: 29149107. DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2017.409
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Rubinstein MR,
    2. Wang X,
    3. Liu W,
    4. Hao Y,
    5. Cai G and
    6. Han YW
    : Fusobacterium nucleatum promotes colorectal carcinogenesis by modulating E-cadherin/β-catenin signaling via its FadA adhesin. Cell Host Microbe 14(2): 195-206, 2013. PMID: 23954158. DOI: 10.1016/j.chom.2013.07.012
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Binder Gallimidi A,
    2. Fischman S,
    3. Revach B,
    4. Bulvik R,
    5. Maliutina A,
    6. Rubinstein AM,
    7. Nussbaum G and
    8. Elkin M
    : Periodontal pathogens Porphyromonas gingivalis and Fusobacterium nucleatum promote tumor progression in an oral-specific chemical carcinogenesis model. Oncotarget 6(26): 22613-22623, 2015. PMID: 26158901. DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.4209
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Socransky SS,
    2. Haffajee AD,
    3. Cugini MA,
    4. Smith C and
    5. Kent RL Jr.
    : Microbial complexes in subgingival plaque. J Clin Periodontol 25(2): 134-144, 1998. PMID: 9495612. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1998.tb02419.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Johansson L,
    2. Sherina N,
    3. Kharlamova N,
    4. Potempa B,
    5. Larsson B,
    6. Israelsson L,
    7. Potempa J,
    8. Rantapää-Dahlqvist S and
    9. Lundberg K
    : Concentration of antibodies against Porphyromonas gingivalis is increased before the onset of symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Res Ther 18: 201, 2016. PMID: 27605245. DOI: 10.1186/s13075-016-1100-4
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Dominy SS,
    2. Lynch C,
    3. Ermini F,
    4. Benedyk M,
    5. Marczyk A,
    6. Konradi A,
    7. Nguyen M,
    8. Haditsch U,
    9. Raha D,
    10. Griffin C,
    11. Holsinger LJ,
    12. Arastu-Kapur S,
    13. Kaba S,
    14. Lee A,
    15. Ryder MI,
    16. Potempa B,
    17. Mydel P,
    18. Hellvard A,
    19. Adamowicz K,
    20. Hasturk H,
    21. Walker GD,
    22. Reynolds EC,
    23. Faull RLM,
    24. Curtis MA,
    25. Dragunow M and
    26. Potempa J
    : Porphyromonas gingivalis in Alzheimer’s disease brains: Evidence for disease causation and treatment with small-molecule inhibitors. Sci Adv 5(1): eaau3333, 2019. PMID: 30746447. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aau3333
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    1. Sandros J,
    2. Karlsson C,
    3. Lappin DF,
    4. Madianos PN,
    5. Kinane DF and
    6. Papapanou PN
    : Cytokine responses of oral epithelial cells to Porphyromonas gingivalis infection. J Dent Res 79(10): 1808-1814, 2000. PMID: 11077999. DOI: 10.1177/00220345000790101301
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Hoppe T,
    2. Kraus D,
    3. Novak N,
    4. Probstmeier R,
    5. Frentzen M,
    6. Wenghoefer M,
    7. Jepsen S and
    8. Winter J
    : Oral pathogens change proliferation properties of oral tumor cells by affecting gene expression of human defensins. Tumour Biol 37(10): 13789-13798, 2016. PMID: 27481514. DOI: 10.1007/s13277-016-5281-x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Mao S,
    2. Park Y,
    3. Hasegawa Y,
    4. Tribble GD,
    5. James CE,
    6. Handfield M,
    7. Stavropoulos MF,
    8. Yilmaz O and
    9. Lamont RJ
    : Intrinsic apoptotic pathways of gingival epithelial cells modulated by Porphyromonas gingivalis. Cell Microbiol 9(8): 1997-2007, 2007. PMID: 17419719. DOI: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2007.00931.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Inaba H,
    2. Sugita H,
    3. Kuboniwa M,
    4. Iwai S,
    5. Hamada M,
    6. Noda T,
    7. Morisaki I,
    8. Lamont RJ and
    9. Amano A
    : Porphyromonas gingivalis promotes invasion of oral squamous cell carcinoma through induction of proMMP9 and its activation. Cell Microbiol 16(1): 131-145, 2014. PMID: 23991831. DOI: 10.1111/cmi.12211
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Chaw SY,
    2. Abdul Majeed A,
    3. Dalley AJ,
    4. Chan A,
    5. Stein S and
    6. Farah CS
    : Epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) biomarkers—E-cadherin, beta-catenin, APC and Vimentin—in oral squamous cell carcinogenesis and transformation. Oral Oncol 48(10): 997-1006, 2012. PMID: 22704062. DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2012.05.011
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Groeger S,
    2. Domann E,
    3. Gonzales JR,
    4. Chakraborty T and
    5. Meyle J
    : B7-H1 and B7-DC receptors of oral squamous carcinoma cells are upregulated by Porphyromonas gingivalis. Immunobiology 216(12): 1302-1310, 2011. PMID: 21723642. DOI: 10.1016/j.imbio.2011.05.005
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Baba A,
    2. Abe N,
    3. Kadowaki T,
    4. Nakanishi H,
    5. Ohishi M,
    6. Asao T and
    7. Yamamoto K
    : Arg-gingipain is responsible for the degradation of cell adhesion molecules of human gingival fibroblasts and their death induced by Porphyromonas gingivalis. Biol Chem 382(5): 817-824, 2001. PMID: 11517936. DOI: 10.1515/BC.2001.099
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Yun PL,
    2. Decarlo AA,
    3. Collyer C and
    4. Hunter N
    : Hydrolysis of interleukin-12 by Porphyromonas gingivalis major cysteine proteinases may affect local gamma interferon accumulation and the Th1 or Th2 T-cell phenotype in periodontitis. Infect Immun 69(9): 5650-5660, 2001. PMID: 11500441. DOI: 10.1128/IAI.69.9.5650-5660.2001
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    1. Inaba H,
    2. Amano A,
    3. Lamont RJ and
    4. Murakami Y
    : Involvement of protease-activated receptor 4 in over-expression of matrix metalloproteinase 9 induced by Porphyromonas gingivalis. Med Microbiol Immunol 204(5): 605-612, 2015. PMID: 25670650. DOI: 10.1007/s00430-015-0389-y
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Ding Y,
    2. Haapasalo M,
    3. Kerosuo E,
    4. Lounatmaa K,
    5. Kotiranta A and
    6. Sorsa T
    : Release and activation of human neutrophil matrix metallo- and serine proteinases during phagocytosis of Fusobacterium nucleatum, Porphyromonas gingivalis and Treponema denticola. J Clin Periodontol 24(4): 237-248, 1997. PMID: 9144046. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1997.tb01837.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Sorsa T,
    2. Ingman T,
    3. Suomalainen K,
    4. Haapasalo M,
    5. Konttinen YT,
    6. Lindy O,
    7. Saari H and
    8. Uitto VJ
    : Identification of proteases from periodontopathogenic bacteria as activators of latent human neutrophil and fibroblast-type interstitial collagenases. Infect Immun 60(11): 4491-4495, 1992. PMID: 1398963. DOI: 10.1128/iai.60.11.4491-4495.1992
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    1. Page-McCaw A,
    2. Ewald AJ and
    3. Werb Z
    : Matrix metalloproteinases and the regulation of tissue remodelling. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 8(3): 221-233, 2007. PMID: 17318226. DOI: 10.1038/nrm2125
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Saarialho-Kere UK,
    2. Vaalamo M,
    3. Puolakkainen P,
    4. Airola K,
    5. Parks WC and
    6. Karjalainen-Lindsberg ML
    : Enhanced expression of matrilysin, collagenase, and stromelysin-1 in gastrointestinal ulcers. Am J Pathol 148(2): 519-526, 1996. PMID: 8579114.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Rosenberg GA
    : Matrix metalloproteinases in brain injury. J Neurotrauma 12(5): 833-842, 1995. PMID: 8594211. DOI: 10.1089/neu.1995.12.833
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Sorsa T,
    2. Gursoy UK,
    3. Nwhator S,
    4. Hernandez M,
    5. Tervahartiala T,
    6. Leppilahti J,
    7. Gursoy M,
    8. Könönen E,
    9. Emingil G,
    10. Pussinen PJ and
    11. Mäntylä P
    : Analysis of matrix metalloproteinases, especially MMP-8, in gingival creviclular fluid, mouthrinse and saliva for monitoring periodontal diseases. Periodontol 2000 70(1): 142-163, 2016. PMID: 26662488. DOI: 10.1111/prd.12101
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Chen HY,
    2. Cox SW,
    3. Eley BM,
    4. Mäntylä P,
    5. Rönkä H and
    6. Sorsa T
    : Matrix metalloproteinase-8 levels and elastase activities in gingival crevicular fluid from chronic adult periodontitis patients. J Clin Periodontol 27(5): 366-369, 2000. PMID: 10847542. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-051x.2000.027005366.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Van den Steen PE,
    2. Proost P,
    3. Wuyts A,
    4. Van Damme J and
    5. Opdenakker G
    : Neutrophil gelatinase B potentiates interleukin-8 tenfold by aminoterminal processing, whereas it degrades CTAP-III, PF-4, and GRO-alpha and leaves RANTES and MCP-2 intact. Blood 96(8): 2673-2681, 2000. PMID: 11023497.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Gearing AJ,
    2. Beckett P,
    3. Christodoulou M,
    4. Churchill M,
    5. Clements JM,
    6. Crimmin M,
    7. Davidson AH,
    8. Drummond AH,
    9. Galloway WA and
    10. Gilbert R
    : Matrix metalloproteinases and processing of pro-TNF-alpha. J Leukoc Biol 57(5): 774-777, 1995. PMID: 7759957. DOI: 10.1002/jlb.57.5.774
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Ito A,
    2. Mukaiyama A,
    3. Itoh Y,
    4. Nagase H,
    5. Thogersen IB,
    6. Enghild JJ,
    7. Sasaguri Y and
    8. Mori Y
    : Degradation of interleukin 1beta by matrix metalloproteinases. J Biol Chem 271(25): 14657-14660, 1996. PMID: 8663297. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.271.25.14657
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. ↵
    1. Bendrik C,
    2. Robertson J,
    3. Gauldie J and
    4. Dabrosin C
    : Gene transfer of matrix metalloproteinase-9 induces tumor regression of breast cancer in vivo. Cancer Res 68(9): 3405-3412, 2008. PMID: 18451168. DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-0295
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. ↵
    1. Garg P,
    2. Sarma D,
    3. Jeppsson S,
    4. Patel NR,
    5. Gewirtz AT,
    6. Merlin D and
    7. Sitaraman SV
    : Matrix metalloproteinase-9 functions as a tumor suppressor in colitis-associated cancer. Cancer Res 70(2): 792-801, 2010. PMID: 20068187. DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-3166
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. ↵
    1. Luukkaa H,
    2. Klemi P,
    3. Leivo I,
    4. Mäkitie AA,
    5. Irish J,
    6. Gilbert R,
    7. Perez-Ordonez B,
    8. Hirsimäki P,
    9. Vahlberg T,
    10. Kivisaari A,
    11. Kähäri VM and
    12. Grénman R
    : Expression of matrix metalloproteinase-1, −7, −9, −13, Ki-67, and HER-2 in epithelial-myoepithelial salivary gland cancer. Head Neck 32(8): 1019-1027, 2010. PMID: 19902536. DOI: 10.1002/hed.21277
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    1. Korpi JT,
    2. Kervinen V,
    3. Mäklin H,
    4. Väänänen A,
    5. Lahtinen M,
    6. Läärä E,
    7. Ristimäki A,
    8. Thomas G,
    9. Ylipalosaari M,
    10. Aström P,
    11. Lopez-Otin C,
    12. Sorsa T,
    13. Kantola S,
    14. Pirilä E and
    15. Salo T
    : Collagenase-2 (matrix metalloproteinase-8) plays a protective role in tongue cancer. Br J Cancer 98(4): 766-775, 2008. PMID: 18253113. DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604239
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    1. Jouhi L,
    2. Mohamed H,
    3. Mäkitie A,
    4. Remes SM,
    5. Haglund C,
    6. Atula T and
    7. Hagström J
    : Toll-like receptor 5 and 7 expression may impact prognosis of HPV-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma patients. Cancer Immunol Immunother 66(12): 1619-1629, 2017. PMID: 28856441. DOI: 10.1007/s00262-017-2054-3
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    1. Kylmä AK,
    2. Jouhi L,
    3. Mohamed H,
    4. Randén-Brady R,
    5. Mäkitie A,
    6. Atula T,
    7. Haglund C,
    8. Sorsa T and
    9. Hagström J
    : In HPV-negative oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma, elevated toll-like receptor 2 immunoexpression may increase the risk of disease-specific mortality. Oral Oncol 107: 104778, 2020. PMID: 32403078. DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2020.104778
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. ↵
    1. Randén-Brady R,
    2. Carpén T,
    3. Jouhi L,
    4. Syrjänen S,
    5. Haglund C,
    6. Tarkkanen J,
    7. Remes S,
    8. Mäkitie A,
    9. Mattila PS,
    10. Silén S and
    11. Hagström J
    : In situ hybridization for high-risk HPV E6/E7 mRNA is a superior method for detecting transcriptionally active HPV in oropharyngeal cancer. Hum Pathol 90: 97-105, 2019. PMID: 31121191. DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2019.05.006
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. ↵
    1. Smeets SJ,
    2. Hesselink AT,
    3. Speel EJ,
    4. Haesevoets A,
    5. Snijders PJ,
    6. Pawlita M,
    7. Meijer CJ,
    8. Braakhuis BJ,
    9. Leemans CR and
    10. Brakenhoff RH
    : A novel algorithm for reliable detection of human papillomavirus in paraffin embedded head and neck cancer specimen. Int J Cancer 121(11): 2465-2472, 2007. PMID: 17680565. DOI: 10.1002/ijc.22980
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. ↵
    1. Mäkinen LK,
    2. Häyry V,
    3. Atula T,
    4. Haglund C,
    5. Keski-Säntti H,
    6. Leivo I,
    7. Mäkitie A,
    8. Passador-Santos F,
    9. Böckelman C,
    10. Salo T,
    11. Sorsa T and
    12. Hagström J
    : Prognostic significance of matrix metalloproteinase-2, −8, −9, and −13 in oral tongue cancer. J Oral Pathol Med 41(5): 394-399, 2012. PMID: 22084953. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0714.2011.01110.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. ↵
    1. Hanemaaijer R,
    2. Sorsa T,
    3. Konttinen YT,
    4. Ding Y,
    5. Sutinen M,
    6. Visser H,
    7. van Hinsbergh VW,
    8. Helaakoski T,
    9. Kainulainen T,
    10. Rönkä H,
    11. Tschesche H and
    12. Salo T
    : Matrix metalloproteinase-8 is expressed in rheumatoid synovial fibroblasts and endothelial cells. Regulation by tumor necrosis factor-alpha and doxycycline. J Biol Chem 272(50): 31504-31509, 1997. PMID: 9395486. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.272.50.31504
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. ↵
    1. Prikk K,
    2. Maisi P,
    3. Pirilä E,
    4. Reintam MA,
    5. Salo T,
    6. Sorsa T and
    7. Sepper R
    : Airway obstruction correlates with collagenase-2 (MMP-8) expression and activation in bronchial asthma. Lab Invest 82(11): 1535-1545, 2002. PMID: 12429813. DOI: 10.1097/01.lab.0000035023.53893.b6
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. ↵
    1. Vento SI,
    2. Jouhi L,
    3. Mohamed H,
    4. Haglund C,
    5. Mäkitie AA,
    6. Atula T,
    7. Hagström J and
    8. Mäkinen LK
    : MMP-7 expression may influence the rate of distant recurrences and disease-specific survival in HPV-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Virchows Arch 472(6): 975-981, 2018. PMID: 29721609. DOI: 10.1007/s00428-018-2365-6
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. ↵
    1. Gao S,
    2. Li S,
    3. Ma Z,
    4. Liang S,
    5. Shan T,
    6. Zhang M,
    7. Zhu X,
    8. Zhang P,
    9. Liu G,
    10. Zhou F,
    11. Yuan X,
    12. Jia R,
    13. Potempa J,
    14. Scott DA,
    15. Lamont RJ,
    16. Wang H and
    17. Feng X
    : Presence of Porphyromonas gingivalis in esophagus and its association with the clinicopathological characteristics and survival in patients with esophageal cancer. Infect Agent Cancer 11: 3, 2016. PMID: 26788120. DOI: 10.1186/s13027-016-0049-x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. ↵
    1. Deshpande RG,
    2. Khan M and
    3. Genco CA
    : Invasion strategies of the oral pathogen porphyromonas gingivalis: implications for cardiovascular disease. Invasion Metastasis 18(2): 57-69, 1998. PMID: 10364686. DOI: 10.1159/000024499
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. ↵
    1. Fan HX,
    2. Li HX,
    3. Chen D,
    4. Gao ZX and
    5. Zheng JH
    : Changes in the expression of MMP2, MMP9, and ColIV in stromal cells in oral squamous tongue cell carcinoma: relationships and prognostic implications. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 31: 90, 2012. PMID: 23107277. DOI: 10.1186/1756-9966-31-90
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. ↵
    1. Nanda DP,
    2. Dutta K,
    3. Ganguly KK,
    4. Hajra S,
    5. Mandal SS,
    6. Biswas J and
    7. Sinha D
    : MMP-9 as a potential biomarker for carcinoma of oral cavity: a study in eastern India. Neoplasma 61(6): 747-757, 2014. PMID: 25150320. DOI: 10.4149/neo_2014_091
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. ↵
    1. Lotfi A,
    2. Mohammadi G,
    3. Tavassoli A,
    4. Mousaviagdas M,
    5. Chavoshi H and
    6. Saniee L
    : Serum levels of MMP9 and MMP2 in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 16(4): 1327-1330, 2015. PMID: 25743793. DOI: 10.7314/apjcp.2015.16.4.1327
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  47. ↵
    1. Peisker A,
    2. Raschke GF,
    3. Fahmy MD,
    4. Guentsch A,
    5. Roshanghias K,
    6. Hennings J and
    7. Schultze-Mosgau S
    : Salivary MMP-9 in the detection of oral squamous cell carcinoma. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 22(3): e270-e275, 2017. PMID: 28160595. DOI: 10.4317/medoral.21626
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  48. ↵
    1. Shin YJ,
    2. Vu H,
    3. Lee JH and
    4. Kim HD
    : Diagnostic and prognostic ability of salivary MMP-9 for oral squamous cell carcinoma: A pre-/post-surgery case and matched control study. PLoS One 16(3): e0248167, 2021. PMID: 33735248. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248167
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. ↵
    1. Lee J,
    2. Roberts JS,
    3. Atanasova KR,
    4. Chowdhury N,
    5. Han K and
    6. Yilmaz Ö
    : Human primary epithelial cells acquire an epithelial-mesenchymal-transition phenotype during long-term infection by the oral opportunistic pathogen, Porphyromonas gingivalis. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 7: 493, 2017. PMID: 29250491. DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2017.00493
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  50. ↵
    1. Sztukowska MN,
    2. Ojo A,
    3. Ahmed S,
    4. Carenbauer AL,
    5. Wang Q,
    6. Shumway B,
    7. Jenkinson HF,
    8. Wang H,
    9. Darling DS and
    10. Lamont RJ
    : Porphyromonas gingivalis initiates a mesenchymal-like transition through ZEB1 in gingival epithelial cells. Cell Microbiol 18(6): 844-858, 2016. PMID: 26639759. DOI: 10.1111/cmi.12554
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  51. ↵
    1. Woo BH,
    2. Kim DJ,
    3. Choi JI,
    4. Kim SJ,
    5. Park BS,
    6. Song JM,
    7. Lee JH and
    8. Park HR
    : Oral cancer cells sustainedly infected with Porphyromonas gingivalis exhibit resistance to Taxol and have higher metastatic potential. Oncotarget 8(29): 46981-46992, 2017. PMID: 28388583. DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.16550
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  52. ↵
    1. Cho BH,
    2. Jung YH,
    3. Kim DJ,
    4. Woo BH,
    5. Jung JE,
    6. Lee JH,
    7. Choi YW and
    8. Park HR
    : Acetylshikonin suppresses invasion of Porphyromonas gingivalis infected YD10B oral cancer cells by modulating the interleukin-8/matrix metalloproteinase axis. Mol Med Rep 17(2): 2327-2334, 2018. PMID: 29207110. DOI: 10.3892/mmr.2017.8151
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  53. ↵
    1. Aparna M,
    2. Rao L,
    3. Kunhikatta V and
    4. Radhakrishnan R
    : The role of MMP-2 and MMP-9 as prognostic markers in the early stages of tongue squamous cell carcinoma. J Oral Pathol Med 44(5): 345-352, 2015. PMID: 25212455. DOI: 10.1111/jop.12245
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  54. ↵
    1. Zhang QW,
    2. Liu L,
    3. Chen R,
    4. Wei YQ,
    5. Li P,
    6. Shi HS and
    7. Zhao YW
    : Matrix metalloproteinase-9 as a prognostic factor in gastric cancer: a meta-analysis. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 13(6): 2903-2908, 2012. PMID: 22938481. DOI: 10.7314/apjcp.2012.13.6.2903
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  55. ↵
    1. Song J,
    2. Su H,
    3. Zhou YY and
    4. Guo LL
    : Prognostic value of matrix metalloproteinase 9 expression in breast cancer patients: a meta-analysis. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 14(3): 1615-1621, 2013. PMID: 23679245. DOI: 10.7314/apjcp.2013.14.3.1615
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  56. ↵
    1. Li CY,
    2. Yuan P,
    3. Lin SS,
    4. Song CF,
    5. Guan WY,
    6. Yuan L,
    7. Lai RB,
    8. Gao Y and
    9. Wang Y
    : Matrix metalloproteinase 9 expression and prognosis in colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Tumour Biol 34(2): 735-741, 2013. PMID: 23269605. DOI: 10.1007/s13277-012-0601-2
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  57. ↵
    1. Peng WJ,
    2. Zhang JQ,
    3. Wang BX,
    4. Pan HF,
    5. Lu MM and
    6. Wang J
    : Prognostic value of matrix metalloproteinase 9 expression in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Clin Chim Acta 413(13-14): 1121-1126, 2012. PMID: 22465234. DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2012.03.012
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  58. ↵
    1. Ahn J,
    2. Chen CY and
    3. Hayes RB
    : Oral microbiome and oral and gastrointestinal cancer risk. Cancer Causes Control 23(3): 399-404, 2012. PMID: 22271008. DOI: 10.1007/s10552-011-9892-7
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research: 42 (11)
Anticancer Research
Vol. 42, Issue 11
November 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Prognostic Role of Porphyromonas gingivalis Gingipain Rgp and Matrix Metalloproteinase 9 in Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 4 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Prognostic Role of Porphyromonas gingivalis Gingipain Rgp and Matrix Metalloproteinase 9 in Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
ANNA KAISA KYLMÄ, TIMO SORSA, LAURI JOUHI, HARRI K. MUSTONEN, HESHAM MOHAMED, REIJA RANDÉN-BRADY, ANTTI MÄKITIE, TIMO ATULA, JAANA HAGSTRÖM, CAJ HAGLUND
Anticancer Research Nov 2022, 42 (11) 5415-5430; DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.16046

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Prognostic Role of Porphyromonas gingivalis Gingipain Rgp and Matrix Metalloproteinase 9 in Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
ANNA KAISA KYLMÄ, TIMO SORSA, LAURI JOUHI, HARRI K. MUSTONEN, HESHAM MOHAMED, REIJA RANDÉN-BRADY, ANTTI MÄKITIE, TIMO ATULA, JAANA HAGSTRÖM, CAJ HAGLUND
Anticancer Research Nov 2022, 42 (11) 5415-5430; DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.16046
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Patients and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Acknowledgements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Bone Toxicity Case Report Combining Encorafenib, Cetuximab and WNT974 in a Phase I Trial
  • Assessment of Breakthrough Cancer Pain Among Female Patients With Cancer: Knowledge, Management and Characterization in the IOPS-MS Study
  • Low-dose Apalutamide in Non-metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer: A Case Series
Show more Clinical Studies

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma
  • OPSCC
  • human papillomavirus
  • Porphyromonas gingivalis
  • gingipain
  • Rgp
  • matrix metalloproteinase
  • survival analysis
Anticancer Research

© 2025 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire