Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleExperimental Studies

Engulfment and Cell Motility 1 (ELMO1) Regulates Tumor Cell Behavior and Predicts Prognosis in Colorectal Cancer

YOUNG-LAN PARK, SUNG-BUM CHO, SUN-YOUNG PARK, HYUNG-HOON OH, EUN MYUNG, CHAN-MUK IM, SEYEONG SON, SEUNGHEE KIM, SEO-YEON CHO, MIN-WOO CHUNG, JI-YUN HONG, KI-HYUN KIM, DAE-SEONG MYUNG, WAN-SIK LEE, DAEHO PARK and YOUNG-EUN JOO
Anticancer Research November 2022, 42 (11) 5343-5355; DOI: https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.16058
YOUNG-LAN PARK
1Department of Oral Biochemistry, College of Dentistry, Chosun University, Gwangju, Republic of Korea;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
SUNG-BUM CHO
2Department of Internal Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Republic of Korea;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
SUN-YOUNG PARK
2Department of Internal Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Republic of Korea;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
HYUNG-HOON OH
2Department of Internal Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Republic of Korea;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
EUN MYUNG
2Department of Internal Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Republic of Korea;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
CHAN-MUK IM
2Department of Internal Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Republic of Korea;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
SEYEONG SON
2Department of Internal Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Republic of Korea;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
SEUNGHEE KIM
2Department of Internal Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Republic of Korea;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
SEO-YEON CHO
2Department of Internal Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Republic of Korea;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MIN-WOO CHUNG
2Department of Internal Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Republic of Korea;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
JI-YUN HONG
2Department of Internal Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Republic of Korea;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
KI-HYUN KIM
2Department of Internal Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Republic of Korea;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DAE-SEONG MYUNG
2Department of Internal Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Republic of Korea;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
WAN-SIK LEE
2Department of Internal Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Republic of Korea;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DAEHO PARK
3School of Life Sciences and Bio Imaging Research Center, Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology, Gwangju, Republic of Korea
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
YOUNG-EUN JOO
2Department of Internal Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Republic of Korea;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: yejoo{at}chonnam.ac.kr
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background/Aim: Engulfment and cell motility 1 (ELMO1) plays a crucial role in the process of migration, chemotaxis, and metastasis of tumor cells. ELMO1 has been implicated in the pathogenesis of various cancers. However, the distinct function of ELMO1 in colorectal cancer (CRC) is unclear. We determined whether ELMO1 affects the oncogenic behavior of CRC cells and investigated its prognostic value in CRC patients. Materials and Methods: We investigated the impact of ELMO1 on tumor cell behavior using small interference RNA (siRNA) in CRC cell lines, including SW480 and DLD1. The expression of ELMO1 was investigated by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), immunohistochemistry, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in cancer tissues and sera obtained from CRC patients. Results: ELMO1 knockdown suppressed tumor cell proliferation in SW480 and DLD1 cells. ELMO1 knockdown-induced apoptosis through up-regulation of caspase-3, −7, and PARP activities and down-regulation of the anti-apoptotic Mcl-1 protein. ELMO1 knockdown-induced cell-cycle arrest by decreasing cyclin D1, cyclin-dependent kinase 2, 4 and 6, and the 25C cell division cycle (CDC25C). ELMO1 knockdown suppressed tumor cell invasion and migration. The expression of E-cadherin was increased, while that of Vimentin and Claudin 1 decreased following ELMO1 knockdown. The phosphorylation levels of PDK1, Akt, and GSK-3β and were down-regulated after ELMO1 knockdown. The expression of ELMO1 was found up-regulated in cancer tissues and sera taken from CRC patients. ELMO1 expression was significantly associated with tumor stage, lymph node metastasis, distant metastases, and poor survival. Conclusion: ELMO1 mediates tumor progression by increasing tumor cell motility and inhibiting apoptosis in human CRC.

Key Words:
  • ELMO1
  • oncogenic phenotype
  • prognosis
  • tumor progression
  • colorectal neoplasm

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the major causes of cancer-associated morbidity and mortality worldwide. In recent years, the survival of CRC patients has improved dramatically through early diagnosis and development of newer therapeutic drugs. The 5-year survival rate for CRC patients in the early stage is 80% to 90%, while the 5-year survival rate for patients in the advanced stage is less than 40% (1, 2). Therefore, identifying biomarkers that can detect CRC early or monitor cancer progression and development of novel targets enable us to improve survival rates of CRC patients (3, 4). The underlying molecular mechanisms that can contribute to the development and progression of CRC include inhibition of tumor cell apoptosis, enhancement of tumor cell proliferation, stimulation of epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT), and inhibition of immune escape (5-7).

The engulfment and cell motility (ELMO) protein family is an evolutionarily conserved cytoplasmic engulfment protein that binds to the dedicator of cytokinesis 180 (DOCK180), a guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) of the Ras-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate family (Rac) and regulates GEF activity (8-11). The resultant ELMO/DOCK180 module promotes Rac-dependent actin cytoskeletal reorganization responsible for the engulfment of apoptotic cells, cell migration, neurite outgrowth, and chemotaxis. In mammals, the ELMO protein family consists of 3 members: ELMO1, ELMO2, and ELMO3 (12-15). ELMO1 and ELMO2 have been shown to function identically in remodeling of the cytoskeleton during cell migration, phagocytosis, and chemotaxis (12-15). However, the function of ELMO3 is not yet fully understood.

Recently, ELMO has also been pivotal for proliferation, adhesion to the extracellular matrix, EMT, migration, invasion, and metastasis of cancer cells (16-19). ELMO1 is aberrantly expressed in various human malignant tumors, including hepatocellular carcinoma, ovarian cancer, glioma, breast cancer, acute myeloid leukemia, and gastric cancer. It is closely related to tumor progression and prognosis (20-25). Furthermore, ELMO3 expression is involved in the processes of tumor growth, invasion and metastasis of colorectal cancer, gastric cancer, and non-small cell lung cancer (26-28). However, the distinct function of ELMO1 in CRC has not yet been explored.

The objectives of the current study were to evaluate whether ELMO1 affects the oncogenic biologic behaviors of human CRC cells, evaluate the expression of ELMO1 in human CRC tissues, and examine the relationship of its correlation with various clinicopathological characteristics, including survival.

Materials and Methods

Cell culture and siRNA transfection. DKO1, COLO205, HCT116, SW480 and DLD1 cells (human CRC cell lines) cells were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA, USA) and cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium (DMEM; Gibco, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 100 U/ml penicillin, 100 μg/ml streptomycin and 50 μg/ml gentamycin (Gibco). Cultures were kept at 37°C with 5% CO2 in a humidified atmosphere. Small interfering (si)RNA (5′-GACAUGAUGAG CGACCUGA-dTdT-3′) and scrambled control used as negative control siRNA (cat. No. #SN-1002) were purchased from Bioneer (Daejeon, Republic of Korea). Transfection of the siRNA was performed using Lipofectamin™ RNAiMAX (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.), according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Briefly, SW480 and DLD1 cells were seeded into 6-well plates such that they would be 40-60% confluent at the time of transfection. A total of 100 μM of ELMO1 siRNA and negative control siRNA was transfected with 5 μl Lipofectamine™ RNAiMAX reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.), respectively. After incubation for 48 h at 37°C, identification of ELMO1 expression was performed by western blotting and transfected cells and siRNA-transfected cells were applied to each experiment.

Cell proliferation assay. The effects of ELMO1 siRNA on cell proliferation in SW480 and DLD1 cells were determined by the water-soluble tetrazolium salts (WST)-1 assay (Daeil lab Inc., Seoul, Republic of Korea) assay. In summary, cells were dispersed within culture plates. A total of 10% WST-1 reagent was added to each well 1 h before the end of incubation. The optical density (OD) values at 450 nm in each well were determined by a microplate reader (Infinite M200; Tecan Austria GmbH, Grödig, Austria). Each experiment was performed in triplicate wells and was repeated at least thrice.

Western blotting. Total protein extracts were prepared using the RIPA® reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) containing protease and phosphatase inhibitors. Protein quantification of each sample was performed using the BCA™ protein assay (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). Subsequently, total protein samples were subjected to 8~12% SDS-PAGE and transferred to polyvinylidene fluoride membranes (PVDF, Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA). The blots were blocked with 5% BSA at room temperature and incubated overnight at 4°C with primary antibodies at 1:1,000 dilution. The blots were then washed with Tris-buffered saline/0.1% Tween-20 and incubated with horseradish peroxidase (HRP) conjugated secondary antibody (Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA, USA) at a dilution of 1:2,000. Protein bands were visualized using a chemiluminescent HRP substrate (Millipore) and the LAS-4000 luminescent image analyzer (Fujifilm, Tokyo, Japan). Immunoblots were quantified using Multi-Gauge gel analysis software (ver 3.0) (Fujifilm). Antibody against ELMO1 and GAPDH was purchased from Abcam (Cambridge, UK) (cat. No. ab2239) and Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA, USA) (cat. No. FL-335), respectively. Antibodies against cleaved caspase-3 (cat. No. #9664), cleaved caspase-7 (cat. No. #8438), cleaved poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP, cat. No. #5625), Mcl-1 (cat. No. #2453), cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 2 (cat. No. #2546), CDK4 (cat. No. #2906), CDK6 (cat. No. #3136), cyclin D1 (cat. No. #2926), cell division cycle (CDC) 25C (cat. No. #4688), phospho-Akt (cat. No. #4060), phospho-glycogen synthase kinase-3β (phospho-GSK3β, cat. No. #5558), phospho-phosphoinositide-dependent protein kinase 1 (phospho-PDK1, cat. No. #3438), E-cadherin (cat. No. #3195), Vimentin (cat. No. #5741), Claudin1 (cat. No. #13255) were purchased from Cell Signaling. All experiments were repeated at least 3 times and bands of immunoblot were quantified using the Multi-Gauge software (Fujifilm).

Analysis of apoptosis by flow cytometry. Apoptosis of siRNA-transfected cells was analyzed by staining cells with Annexin V-APC/7-amino-actinomycin D (7-AAD) (BD Biosciences, San Diego, CA, USA). Cell apoptotic rate (%) was determined as the sum of the 7AAA- annexin V+ population (% early apoptotic cells) and 7AAD+/annexin V+ population (% late apoptotic cells). Cells were washed with PBS once prior to trypsinization. The trypsinized cell pellet was gently resuspended in 1x binding buffer (BD Biosciences). Subsequently, cells were stained by the addition of Annexin V-APC and 7-AAD. Cells were incubated in the dark for 10 min and subjected to detection by BD FACSCalibur flow cytometry (Becton Dickinson, San José, CA, USA). The apoptotic cell population was analyzed on the BD Cell Quest® version 3.3 (Becton Dickinson) and WinMDI version 2.9 (The Scripps Research Institute, San Diego, CA, USA). All experiments were repeated at least 3 times.

Detection of cell-cycle distribution using flow cytometry. Cell-cycle distribution of siRNA-transfected cells was determined by flow cytometry DNA analysis. Cells were removed from plates by trypsin and fixed in 70% ethanol at −20°C. Fixed cells were washed with PBS and resuspended with 10 μg/ml ribonuclease A (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) for 30 min. Resuspended cells were stained with 50 mg/ml propidium iodide (Sigma-Aldrich) for 15 min in the dark. DNA content was evaluated in BD Cell Quest® version 3.3 (Becton Dickinson) and WinMDI version 2.9 (The Scripps Research Institute). All experiments were repeated at least 3 times.

Gelatin invasion assay. The invasion ability of siRNA-transfected cells was observed using Transwell chambers with 8-μm pores size (Corning Inc., NY, USA). A quantity of 1% gelatin with RPMI1640 was pipetted into the upper chamber (culture insert), which was placed in a lower chamber and dried on a clean bench. Cells transfected (1×105 cells/well) with siRNA with 0.2% bovine serum albumin were seeded in the upper chamber and then transferred to the lower chamber consisting of 400 μl 0.2% BSA medium containing human plasma fibronectin (Calbiochem, La Jolla, CA, USA). After overnight incubation at 37°C, the upper chamber was fixed with 70% ethanol and stained with Diff-Quik solution (Sysmex, Kobe, Japan). Non-migrated cells on the inner surface of the upper chamber were wiped off using a cotton swab. Under an inverted microscope, invaded cells of the lower surface were then observed and counted in 5 selected fields under a light microscope. Results are expressed as mean±SD of the number of cells/field on three individual experiments.

Wound healing assay. The wound-healing assay was subjected to Culture Inserts (Ibidi, Regensburg, Germany). Cells transfected with siRNA were seeded in Culture Inserts. After becoming confluent, the inserts were gently removed using sterile forceps. Next, cells were cultured with a new culture medium, and wound-healing was photographed at 3 random sites at 0, 24, and 48 h of culture. The gap distance for each hour was converted to 1 cm and statistically analyzed. All experiments were repeated at least 3 times.

Patients and tissue samples. Fresh CRC tissues and adjacent paired normal tissues were collected from 20 CRC patients who underwent colonoscopic biopsy at the Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital (Jeonnam, Republic of Korea). The biopsy of CRC tissues and adjacent normal tissues was quickly frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80°C until RNA was extracted. Sera from 126 CRC patients who were histopathologically diagnosed in our Hospital were obtained. CRC patients did not receive any therapy before serum and tissue sample collection and had no other severe systemic diseases. Sera from a healthy individual group were obtained from 126 healthy subjects who visited for routine health screening. Sera was stored at −80°C until use. For immunohistochemistry, formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissue samples were obtained from 425 patients who underwent surgery for pathologically confirmed colon cancers at the Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital (Jeonnam, Republic of Korea) between July 2009 and June 2011. None of the patients had received preoperative radiotherapy or chemotherapy. The tissue blocks examined the original pathological slide, and selected blocks showed the junction between the normal colonic epithelium and the tumor region. Tumor staging was performed according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system (29). Overall survival was analyzed from the date of initiation of the operation until 31 December 2017. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB No. CNUHH-2019-046) of the Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital. Also, ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Board of the Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital. The biospecimens and data used for this study were provided by the Biobank of Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, a member of the Korea Biobank Network with the approval of IRB. All participants gave their written consent for storage information in the hospital database and later use for research.

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Blood samples were precipitated at room temperature for 30 min and centrifuged to separate serum. All serum samples were kept at −80°C before use. Serum levels of ELMO1 protein were measured using the ELMO1 ELISA kit (MyBiosource, San Diego, CA, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, serum samples and standards were placed on a Microelisa plate. Next, HRP conjugate reagent was added to each well and incubated for 1 h at 37°C. After washing the plate 4 times, chromogen solution was added to the microplate, and the OD was determined using a microplate reader (Infinite M200; Tecan). Finally, OD values were converted to concentration using the standard curve derived from serially diluted ELMO1 standards. Each experiment was performed in triplicate.

Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Total RNA from siRNA-transfected cells was isolated using TRIzol reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). After quantifying the amount of total RNA, 1 μg total RNA from each sample was converted to cDNA using 50 ng/μl oligo-dT and MMLV transcription reagents (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). Next, PCR amplification was performed using gene-specific primers and Go Taq® DNA polymerase (Promega). The sequences of primers for ELMO1 were forward 5′-GCACTGAGCGATACCAGAAA-3′ and reverse 5′-CCTGTCTTCCAGGAGGTTAAAG-3′. The sequences of the primers for GAPDH were forward 5′-ACCACAGTCCATGCCATCAC-3′/5′-TCCACCACCCTGTTGCTGTA-3′. Finally, the PCR products were separated by electrophoresis on agarose gel and quantified on using Multi-Gauge software (Fujifilm).

Immunohistochemistry. Paraffin-embedded sections (4 μm) were dewaxed and rehydrated with graded alcohols. Antigen recovery was carried out in a citrate buffer (pH 6.0, Dako, Carpentaria, CA, USA) using a pressure cooker. The 10% goat serum and Dako REAL™ peroxidase blocking solution (Dako) were then used to block endogenous antigen and endogenous peroxide activity, respectively. Sections were incubated with primary antibodies against ELMO1 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) at 1:600 dilution overnight at 4°C. TBST stained sections were stained using the Dako REAL™ Envision HRP/DAB detection system (Dako) and counterstained with hematoxylin for 30 s. Stained sections were observed and photographed using a light microscope.

Evaluation of ELMO1 expression. ELMO1 stained sections were divided into 2 groups (negative and positive) based on the percentage and intensity of stained cells. The percentage of stained cells was classified as follows: 0 (none), 1 (<10%), 2 (10-50%) and 3 (>50%). The degree of intensity of staining was classified as follows: 0 (no staining), 1 (weakly staining), 2 (moderately staining) and 3 (strongly staining). The overall score was defined as the value of the percent staining rate and intensity scores. The mean overall score of ≤3 was defined as negative, and of >3 was defined as positive. All samples were evaluated by two independent observers without the knowledge of the patient clinical outcome data.

Statistical analysis. Statistical analysis was performed using statistical software the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software version 20.0 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA). The relationship between ELMO1 expression and clinicopathological parameters was investigated using the Pearson’s Chi-square test. The diagnostic value of serum expression of ELMO1 was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Survival results were reported using the Kaplan-Merrier method, and the significance of the difference was confirmed using the logarithmic rank test. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using the Cox proportional hazards regression model. The results of the intergroup comparison were expressed as mean values±standard deviation (SD) of at least 3 independent experiments. The student’s t-test was performed for the comparison of 2 groups. Significance was set at p<0.05.

Results

ELMO1 knockdown inhibits proliferation of human CRC cells. To investigate ELMO1 expression of ELMO1 in human CRC cells, the expression of the ELMO1 protein was examined by western blotting in human CRC cell lines including DKO1, COLO205, HCT116, SW480 and DLD1. The expression of ELMO1 protein was higher in SW480 and DLD1 cells among the cell lines tested (Figure 1A). To investigate the function of ELMO1 in the oncogenic biologic behaviors of CRC cells, ELMO1 siRNA was used to knockdown endogenous expression of the ELMO1 gene in SW480 and DLD1 cells. ELMO1 protein expression showed a specific decrease after transfection of ELMO1 siRNA in SW480 and DLD1 cells (Figure 1B). To access the potential of ELMO1 knockdown on cell proliferation, a cell proliferation assay was performed 1, 2, 3 and 4 days after transfection of the ELMO1 siRNA. ELMO1 siRNA-transfected SW480, and DLD1 cells significantly decreased the number of proliferating cells, compared to siRNA-transfected scramble cells at 4 days, respectively (p<0.001 and 0.007, respectively) (Figure 1C).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Engulfment and cell motility 1 (ELMO1) knockdown inhibits proliferation of human colorectal cancer (CRC) cells. (A) Expression of ELMO1 protein in human CRC cell lines. Graphical representation of band intensities quantified using the Multi-gauge software (Fujifilm, Tokyo, Japan). (B) Effect of ELMO1 knockdown in CRC cells. Expression of ELMO1 protein was decreased by transfection of ELMO1 siRNA (E1S) into SW480 and DLD1 cells. (C) Impact of ELMO1 knockdown on the proliferation of CRC cells. E1S-transfected SW480 and DLD1 cells had significantly decreased numbers of proliferating cells, compared to cells transfected with scramble siRNA (SS) at 4 days, respectively (mean±standard deviation, n=3; *p<0.05).

ELMO1 knockdown promotes apoptosis of human CRC cells. To evaluate whether ELMO1 knockdown could induce apoptosis, we performed flow cytometric analyzes. The cell apoptotic rate induced by transfection of ELMO1 siRNA increased significantly, compared to that induced by transfection of scramble siRNA in SW480 and DLD1 cells (p=0.028 and 0.042, respectively) (Figure 2A and B). To determine the activation of caspase, a key enzyme in the apoptosis process, during ELMO1 knockdown-induced apoptosis we further investigated the cleaved form of caspase. The expression of cleaved caspase-3, −7 and PARP was significantly up-regulated in SW480 and DLD1 cells after ELMO1 knockdown (Figure 2C). In addition, the level of anti-apoptotic Mcl-1 protein was significantly reduced by removing ELMO1 from SW480 and DLD1 cells (Figure 2C).

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Engulfment and cell motility 1 (ELMO1) knockdown promotes apoptosis of human colorectal cancer (CRC) cells. (A) Representative flow cytometry plots. One representative experiment of three independent experiments is shown. (B) The proportion of apoptotic cells induced by ELMO1 siRNA (E1S) transfection was greater than that induced by scramble siRNA (SS) transfection in SW480 and DLD1 cells (mean±standard deviation (SD), n=3; *p<0.05). (C) Expression of the cleaved caspase-3, −7, poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP), and myeloid cell leukemia-1 (Mcl-1) proteins. The cleaved caspase-3, −7 and PARP expressions were up-regulated and anti-apoptotic Mcl-1 protein level was down-regulated in the SW480 and DLD1 cells after ELMO1 knockdown. Each bar represents the mean±SD of 3 experiments. *p<0.05 versus scrambled siRNA-transfected cells.

ELMO1 knockdown induces cell-cycle arrest of human CRC cells. To detect whether ELMO1 knockdown could change the DNA content distribution of cell-cycle phase, we performed flow cytometric analyses. ELMO1 knockdown significantly promoted the apoptotic fraction (sub-G1 phase) of SW480 and DLD1 cells (p=0.002 and p=0.022, respectively) (Figure 3A and B). Next, we evaluated the effects of ELMO1 on positive regulators, including cyclins, CDKs, and CDC25C in human CRC cells. As shown in Figure 3C, the levels of CDK2, CDK4, CDK6, cyclin D1 and CDC25C protein decreased significantly by the elimination of ELMO1 in SW480 and DLD1 cells.

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

Engulfment and cell motility 1 (ELMO1) knockdown induces cell-cycle arrest of human colorectal cancer (CRC) cells. (A) Representative flow cytometry plots. One representative experiment of three independent experiments is shown. (B) ELMO1 knockdown significantly promoted the apoptotic fraction (sub G1 phase) of SW480 and DLD1 cells (mean±standard deviation (SD), n=3; *p<0.05). (C) Expression of cell-cycle regulatory proteins. Levels of cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK)2, CDK4, CDK6, cyclin D1 and cell division cycle 25C (CDC25C) protein decreased significantly by ELMO1 knockdown in SW480 and DLD1 cells. Each bar represents the mean±SD of 3 experiments. *p<0.05 versus scrambled siRNA-transfected cells. ELMO1 knockdown. SS; Scramble siRNA; E1S: ELMO1 siRNA.

ELMO1 knockdown inhibits invasion and migration of human CRC cells. The number of SW480 and DLD1 cells invaded by transfected ELMO1 siRNA-transfected was significantly decreased compared to that of cells transfected with scramble siRNA (p=0.013 and p<0.001, respectively) (Figure 4A). In addition, the artificial wound gap in the plates of cells transfected with scrambled siRNA became significantly narrower than in cells transfected with ELMO1 siRNA at 48 h in SW480 and DLD1 cells (p<0.001 and p=0.010, respectively) (Figure 4B).

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

Engulfment and cell motility 1 (ELMO1) knockdown inhibits invasion and migration of human colorectal cancer (CRC) cells. (A) Impact of ELMO1 knockdown on the invasion of human CRC cells. An invasion assay was performed using siRNA-transfected cells. The stained invading cells were counted and are represented as graphs between groups. The number of invading cells was significantly lower compared to non-transfected cells [mean±standard deviation (SD), n=3; *p<0.05]. (B) Impact of ELMO1 knockdown on human CRC cell migration. A wound healing assay was performed using siRNA-transfected cells and cell migration graphs were displayed as relative healing distances (mean±SD, n=3; *p<0.05). The artificial wound gap in plates of scramble siRNA (SS)-transfected cells became significantly narrower than in ELMO1 siRNA (E1S)-transfected cells at 48 h in SW480 and DLD1 cells.

ELMO1 knockdown inhibits EMT of human CRC cells. To investigate the phenotypic changes induced by EMT in human CRC cells, the expression of well-known EMT associated target genes, such as E-cadherin, Vimentin and Claudin 1, was compared after transfection of scrambled siRNA and ELMO1 siRNA in SW480 and DLD1 cells. E-cadherin expression was significantly increased, and Vimentin and Claudin 1 significantly decreased in SW480 and DLD1 cells transfected with ELMO1 siRNA, compared to cells transfected with scramble siRNA (Figure 5).

Figure 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 5.

Engulfment and cell motility 1 (ELMO1) knockdown inhibits epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) in human colorectal cancer (CRC) cells. The expression of E-cadherin increased and Vimentin and Claudin 1 decreased in SW480 and DLD1 cells transfected with ELMO1 siRNA (E1S), compared to scramble siRNA (SS)-transfected cells. Each bar represents the mean±standard deviation of 3 experiments. *p<0.05 versus scrambled siRNA-transfected cells.

Impact of ELMO1 knockdown on oncogenic signaling pathways in human CRC cells. To explore the possible mechanisms of ELMO1 involved in the oncogenic behaviors of human CRC cells, we determined the phosphorylation levels of PDK1, Akt and GSK-3β signaling proteins using western blotting. The phosphorylation levels of PDK1, Akt, and GSK-3β were significantly down-regulated by ELMO1 knockdown in SW480 and DLD1 cells (Figure 6).

Figure 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 6.

Impact of engulfment and cell motility 1 (ELMO1) knockdown on oncogenic signaling pathways in human colorectal cancer (CRC) cells. The phosphorylation levels of Akt, glycogen synthase kinase 3β (GSK-3β), and phosphoinositide-dependent protein kinase 1 (PDK1) were down-regulated by ELMO1 knockdown in SW480 and DLD1 cells. Each bar represents the mean±standard deviation of 3 experiments. *p<0.05 versus scrambled siRNA-transfected cells. SS: Scramble siRNA; E1S: ELMO1 siRNA.

Expression of ELMO1 in cancer tissues and sera taken from human CRC patients. To determine the level of ELMO1 expression in CRC samples, we first evaluated the expression of ELMO1 at the RNA level by RT-PCR in 20 CRC tissues and the paired normal colon mucosa of the same patients taken by colonoscopic biopsy. We confirmed the up-regulation of ELMO1 expression in cancer tissues compared to paired normal mucosa at the mRNA level (p=0.010) (Figure 7A). Additionally, we evaluated the expression of ELMO1 at the protein level by ELISA in sera obtained from 126 CRC patients and 126 healthy individuals. The mean value of the ELMO1 protein in the sera of patients with CRC was significantly higher than that of healthy individuals (p<0.001) (Figure 7B). Finally, ROC curve analysis was performed to explore whether serum expression of ELMO1 has any diagnostic value in CRC. The results revealed that serum levels of ELMO1 could serve as a predictor for discriminating CRC patients from healthy individuals, with an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.803 (Figure 7C). At a cutoff value of 3.790 ng/ml, the sensitivity and specificity were 71.4% and 71.4%, respectively.

Figure 7.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 7.

Expression of engulfment and cell motility 1 (ELMO1) in colonoscopy biopsy samples and sera investigated by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. (A) ELMO1 expression was found up-regulated in cancer tissues compared to the normal mucosa paired at the mRNA level in colonoscopic biopsy specimens. Each bar represents the mean±standard deviation of 20 cases. *p<0.05 versus normal colonic mucosa. (B) ELMO1 expression at the protein level was evaluated by ELISA in sera obtained from 126 colorectal cancer (CRC) patients and 126 healthy individuals. The mean value of the ELMO1 protein in sera of CRC patients was significantly higher than in healthy individuals (HI). *p<0.05 versus healthy individuals. (C) Analysis of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for the detection of CRC using ELOM1 serum. At a cut-off value of 3.790 ng/ml, the sensitivity and specificity were 71.4% and 71.4%, respectively. AUC=0.803.

Correlation between ELMO1 expression and clinicopathological characteristics in human CRC. To study the prognostic role of ELMO1 in the progression of human CRC, we assessed ELMO1 expression by immunohistochemical staining in tissues obtained from 425 CRC patients with clinicopathological data. And then, we analyzed the correlation between ELMO1 immunostaining and clinicopathological parameters including survival. Immunostaining of the ELMO1 protein was predominantly identified in the cytoplasm of cancer cells and was not detectable in the tumor stroma. On the contrary, immunostaining of the ELMO1 protein was weakly stained in normal colorectal mucosa (Figure 8A and B). ELMO1 immunostaining was significantly associated with tumor stage, lymph node metastasis, and distant metastasis (p<0.001, p<0.001, and p=0.002, respectively) (Table I). Furthermore, overall survival for patients with positive immunostaining for ELMO1 was significantly lower compared to that of patients without immunostaining (p=0.014) (Figure 9). To evaluate the potential prognostic variables in patients with CRC, univariate and multivariate analyses using the Cox proportional hazard model were performed. In multivariate analysis, positive immunostaining of ELMO1 was independently associated with poor overall survival after adjustment of several covariates, such as age, sex, tumor size, lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion, and cancer stage (HR=1.962; 95% CI=1.345-2.861; p<0.001; Table II).

Figure 8.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 8.

Expression of engulfment and cell motility 1 (ELMO1) in human colorectal cancer (CRC) tissues evaluated by immunohistochemistry. (A) Immunostaining of the ELMO1 protein was weakly stained in the normal colorectal mucosa (×200). (B) Immunostaining of the ELMO1 protein was predominantly identified in the cytoplasm of cancer cells and was not detectable in the tumor stroma (×200).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

Correlation between engulfment and cell motility 1 (ELMO1) expression and clinicopathological parameters of human colorectal cancer.

Figure 9.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 9.

Kaplan-Meier survival curve correlating overall survival with positive expression (solid line) and negative expression (dotted line) of engulfment and cell motility 1 (ELMO1). Overall survival for patients with positive immunostaining for ELMO1 was significantly lower than that of patients without it (p=0.014).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table II.

Cox regression analyses of the association between engulfment and cell motility 1 (ELMO1) immunoreactivity and survival in human colorectal cancer adjusted for clinicopathological parameters.

Discussion

The ELMO protein family is a highly evolutionarily conserved protein family that plays a crucial role in cytoskeleton rearrangement during phagocytosis, cellular migration, chemotaxis, and metastasis of tumor cells (15-18). In mammals, the family of ELMO proteins consists of 3 ELMO genes, ELMO1, ELMO2 and ELMO3 (8-15). Previously, ELMO3 expression was associated with tumor cell growth, invasion, metastasis, and a poor prognosis of colorectal cancer (26). However, the distinct function of ELMO1 in CRC remains to be explored.

Apoptosis is programmed cell death that occurs regularly to control the tissue homeostatic balance between the rate of cell growth and cell death (30, 31). The cell-cycle represents a series of strictly controlled fundamental events involving successive DNA replication and mitosis periods in cell biology (32, 33). However, dysregulation of apoptosis and cell-cycle progression is the hall markers of cancer cells that can contribute to uncontrolled tumor cell growth and proliferation in many types of cancers (30-33). In our study, ELMO1 knockdown inhibited tumor cell proliferation, induced apoptosis and cell-cycle arrest in human CRC cells. Therefore, ELMO1 expression can contribute to progression of human CRC by dysregulating tumor cell survival and cell-cycle progression. Previous studies showed that ELMO1 expression is associated with tumor cell growth, invasion and metastasis of variable human cancers including hepatocellular carcinoma, ovarian cancer, glioma, breast cancer, acute myeloid leukemia, and gastric cancer (20-25).

EMT is a critical process of cancer progression, by which epithelial cells lose cell-cell adhesion and transition to motile mesenchymal cells, and leads to an increase in migratory, invasive, and metastatic properties in cancer cells (5-7). In our study, ELMO1 knockdown suppressed tumor cell invasion and migration, was associated with up-regulation of epithelial markers and down-regulation of mesenchymal markers in human CRC cells. Previously, ELMO1 expression was associated with EMT in human hepatocellular carcinoma and gastric cancer cells (18, 25), similar to our results.

To elucidate the underlying mechanisms that led to these results, we analyzed the effect of ELMO1 on the stimulation of multiple intracellular signaling pathways, which regulate the invasive and oncogenic phenotypes of human CRC cells. In our study, phosphorylation levels of Akt, GSK-3β, and PDK1 were down-regulated by ELMO1 knockdown. Phosphorinositide-3-kinase/Akt (PI3K/Akt) and GSK-3β are involved in a variety of cellular processes such as cell proliferation, differentiation, angiogenesis, cell-cycle, and apoptosis. Additionally, they are the classical signaling pathways in tumorigenesis and influence the invasion, metastasis, and aggressiveness of cancer cells (34, 35). Previously, ELMO1 was associated with tumor cell progression through PI3K/Akt signaling in gastric cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, and breast cancer (25, 18, 36). PDK1 is a master regulator of protein kinase A, G and C family kinases to control cell proliferation, apoptosis, and metabolic homeostasis and is considered the master upstream lipid kinase of the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway. PDK1 functions to phosphorylate and partially activate PI3K/Akt, triggering the activation of downstream effectors. Previously, PDK1 expression was up-regulated in multiple types of cancers and played a key role in cancer development and progression. Furthermore, PDK1 expression potentiates its downstream substrate PI3K/Akt to facilitate tumorigenesis (37, 38). Therefore, our results indicate that the alteration of PDK1 expression by ELMO1 may be a critical component of oncogenic PI3K/Akt signaling in human CRC.

ELMO1 expression has been reported to be highly expressed in various types of human cancers and has also been associated with tumor progression (20-25). Next, to confirm the results of the human CRC cell line study, we evaluated ELMO1 mRNA in human colorectal cancer tissues. We paired normal colorectal mucosa of the same patients taken by colonoscopic biopsy and the level of ELMO1 protein in sera taken from 139 CRC patients and healthy individuals, respectively. We confirmed up-of ELMO1 mRNA levels in cancer tissues compared to paired normal mucosa in fresh colonoscopic biopsy specimens. Furthermore, the level of ELMO1 protein increased in sera from CRC patients compared to healthy individuals, suggesting its role as a diagnostic biomarker in CRC. These results suggest that ELMO1 has the potential to promote CRC development and progression. Further animal experiments are needed to evaluate the potential of ADAM12 as a diagnostic, prognosis, and therapeutic marker in CRC in the future.

Finally, we documented the expression of ELMO1 in a well-defined series of human CRC samples, including long-term and complete follow-up, with special reference to patient prognosis. ELMO1 expression was significantly associated with tumor stage, lymph node metastasis, distant metastases, and poor survival. In addition, ELMO1 expression was independently associated with poor survival in multivariate analysis. These results suggest that ELMO1 expression may help predict the poor clinical outcome of human CRC.

Taken together, ELMO1 mediates tumor progression by increasing tumor cell motility and inhibiting apoptosis in human CRC.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Korea National Research Foundation (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT) (NRF-2017R1A2B-4004703 and NRF-2019R1F1A1063463), Republic of Korea.

Footnotes

  • ↵* These Authors contributed equally to this study.

  • Authors’ Contributions

    YLP, SBC, DP and YEJ conceived and designed the study. YLP, SBC, SYP and DP performed the experiments. HHO, EM, CMI, SS, SK, SYC, MWC, JYH, KHK, DSM and YEJ collected and analyzed the data. YLP, SBC, HHO and YEJ wrote, reviewed and/or revised the manuscript. WSL, DP confirmed the authenticity of all the raw data. All Authors read and approved the final manuscript.

  • Conflicts of Interest

    The Authors declare that they have no competing interests.

  • Received July 30, 2022.
  • Revision received September 2, 2022.
  • Accepted September 14, 2022.
  • Copyright © 2022 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Mattiuzzi C,
    2. Sanchis-Gomar F and
    3. Lippi G
    : Concise update on colorectal cancer epidemiology. Ann Transl Med 7(21): 609, 2019. PMID: 32047770. DOI: 10.21037/atm.2019.07.91
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Ahmed M
    : Colon Cancer: A clinician’s perspective in 2019. Gastroenterology Res 13(1): 1-10, 2020. PMID: 32095167. DOI: 10.14740/gr1239
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Jung G,
    2. Hernández-Illán E,
    3. Moreira L,
    4. Balaguer F and
    5. Goel A
    : Epigenetics of colorectal cancer: biomarker and therapeutic potential. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 17(2): 111-130, 2020. PMID: 31900466. DOI: 10.1038/s41575-019-0230-y
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Oh HH and
    2. Joo YE
    : Novel biomarkers for the diagnosis and prognosis of colorectal cancer. Intest Res 18(2): 168-183, 2020. PMID: 31766836. DOI: 10.5217/ir.2019.00080
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Coban B,
    2. Bergonzini C,
    3. Zweemer AJM and
    4. Danen EHJ
    : Metastasis: crosstalk between tissue mechanics and tumour cell plasticity. Br J Cancer 124(1): 49-57, 2021. PMID: 33204023. DOI: 10.1038/s41416-020-01150-7
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Majidpoor J and
    2. Mortezaee K
    : Steps in metastasis: an updated review. Med Oncol 38(1): 3, 2021. PMID: 33394200. DOI: 10.1007/s12032-020-01447-w
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Datta A,
    2. Deng S,
    3. Gopal V,
    4. Yap KC,
    5. Halim CE,
    6. Lye ML,
    7. Ong MS,
    8. Tan TZ,
    9. Sethi G,
    10. Hooi SC,
    11. Kumar AP and
    12. Yap CT
    : Cytoskeletal dynamics in epithelial-mesenchymal transition: Insights into therapeutic targets for cancer metastasis. Cancers (Basel) 13(8): 1882, 2021. PMID: 33919917. DOI: 10.3390/cancers13081882
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Hochreiter-Hufford A and
    2. Ravichandran KS
    : Clearing the dead: apoptotic cell sensing, recognition, engulfment, and digestion. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 5(1): a008748, 2013. PMID: 23284042. DOI: 10.1101/cshperspect.a008748
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Brugnera E,
    2. Haney L,
    3. Grimsley C,
    4. Lu M,
    5. Walk SF,
    6. Tosello-Trampont AC,
    7. Macara IG,
    8. Madhani H,
    9. Fink GR and
    10. Ravichandran KS
    : Unconventional Rac-GEF activity is mediated through the Dock180-ELMO complex. Nat Cell Biol 4(8): 574-582, 2002. PMID: 12134158. DOI: 10.1038/ncb824
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Lu M,
    2. Kinchen JM,
    3. Rossman KL,
    4. Grimsley C,
    5. deBakker C,
    6. Brugnera E,
    7. Tosello-Trampont AC,
    8. Haney LB,
    9. Klingele D,
    10. Sondek J,
    11. Hengartner MO and
    12. Ravichandran KS
    : PH domain of ELMO functions in trans to regulate Rac activation via Dock180. Nat Struct Mol Biol 11(8): 756-762, 2004. PMID: 15247908. DOI: 10.1038/nsmb800
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Lu M,
    2. Kinchen JM,
    3. Rossman KL,
    4. Grimsley C,
    5. Hall M,
    6. Sondek J,
    7. Hengartner MO,
    8. Yajnik V and
    9. Ravichandran KS
    : A Steric-inhibition model for regulation of nucleotide exchange via the Dock180 family of GEFs. Curr Biol 15(4): 371-377, 2005. PMID: 15723800. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2005.01.050
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Gumienny TL,
    2. Brugnera E,
    3. Tosello-Trampont AC,
    4. Kinchen JM,
    5. Haney LB,
    6. Nishiwaki K,
    7. Walk SF,
    8. Nemergut ME,
    9. Macara IG,
    10. Francis R,
    11. Schedl T,
    12. Qin Y,
    13. Van Aelst L,
    14. Hengartner MO and
    15. Ravichandran KS
    : CED-12/ELMO, a novel member of the CrkII/Dock180/Rac pathway, is required for phagocytosis and cell migration. Cell 107(1): 27-41, 2001. PMID: 11595183. DOI: 10.1016/s0092-8674(01)00520-7
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Xu X and
    2. Jin T
    : ELMO proteins transduce G protein-coupled receptor signal to control reorganization of actin cytoskeleton in chemotaxis of eukaryotic cells. Small GTPases 10(4): 271-279, 2019. PMID: 28641070. DOI: 10.1080/21541248.2017.1318816
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Patel M,
    2. Margaron Y,
    3. Fradet N,
    4. Yang Q,
    5. Wilkes B,
    6. Bouvier M,
    7. Hofmann K and
    8. Côté JF
    : An evolutionarily conserved autoinhibitory molecular switch in ELMO proteins regulates Rac signaling. Curr Biol 20(22): 2021-2027, 2010. PMID: 21035343. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2010.10.028
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Patel M,
    2. Pelletier A and
    3. Côté JF
    : Opening up on ELMO regulation: New insights into the control of Rac signaling by the DOCK180/ELMO complex. Small GTPases 2(5): 268-275, 2011. PMID: 22292130. DOI: 10.4161/sgtp.2.5.17716
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Abu-Thuraia A,
    2. Gauthier R,
    3. Chidiac R,
    4. Fukui Y,
    5. Screaton RA,
    6. Gratton JP and
    7. Côté JF
    : Axl phosphorylates Elmo scaffold proteins to promote Rac activation and cell invasion. Mol Cell Biol 35(1): 76-87, 2015. PMID: 25332238. DOI: 10.1128/MCB.00764-14
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Michaelsen SR,
    2. Aslan D,
    3. Urup T,
    4. Poulsen HS,
    5. Grønbæk K,
    6. Broholm H and
    7. Kristensen LS
    : DNA Methylation Levels of the ELMO Gene Promoter CpG Islands in Human Glioblastomas. Int J Mol Sci 19(3): 679, 2018. PMID: 29495584. DOI: 10.3390/ijms19030679
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Peng H,
    2. Zhang Y,
    3. Zhou Z,
    4. Guo Y,
    5. Huang X,
    6. Westover KD,
    7. Zhang Z,
    8. Chen B,
    9. Hua Y,
    10. Li S,
    11. Xu R,
    12. Lin N,
    13. Peng B and
    14. Shen S
    : Intergrated analysis of ELMO1, serves as a link between tumour mutation burden and epithelial-mesenchymal transition in hepatocellular carcinoma. EBioMedicine 46: 105-118, 2019. PMID: 31324602. DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2019.07.002
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Wang Y,
    2. Xu X,
    3. Pan M and
    4. Jin T
    : ELMO1 Directly interacts with Gβγ subunit to transduce GPCR signaling to Rac1 activation in chemotaxis. J Cancer 7(8): 973-983, 2016. PMID: 27313788. DOI: 10.7150/jca.15118
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Jiang J,
    2. Liu G,
    3. Miao X,
    4. Hua S and
    5. Zhong D
    : Overexpression of engulfment and cell motility 1 promotes cell invasion and migration of hepatocellular carcinoma. Exp Ther Med 2(3): 505-511, 2011. PMID: 22977532. DOI: 10.3892/etm.2011.229
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Wang J,
    2. Dai JM,
    3. Che YL,
    4. Gao YM,
    5. Peng HJ,
    6. Liu B,
    7. Wang H and
    8. Linghu H
    : Elmo1 helps dock180 to regulate Rac1 activity and cell migration of ovarian cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 24(5): 844-850, 2014. PMID: 24819662. DOI: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000137
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Jarzynka MJ,
    2. Hu B,
    3. Hui KM,
    4. Bar-Joseph I,
    5. Gu W,
    6. Hirose T,
    7. Haney LB,
    8. Ravichandran KS,
    9. Nishikawa R and
    10. Cheng SY
    : ELMO1 and Dock180, a bipartite Rac1 guanine nucleotide exchange factor, promote human glioma cell invasion. Cancer Res 67(15): 7203-7211, 2007. PMID: 17671188. DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-0473
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Liang Y,
    2. Wang S and
    3. Zhang Y
    : Downregulation of Dock1 and Elmo1 suppresses the migration and invasion of triple-negative breast cancer epithelial cells through the RhoA/Rac1 pathway. Oncol Lett 16(3): 3481-3488, 2018. PMID: 30127952. DOI: 10.3892/ol.2018.9077
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Capala ME,
    2. Vellenga E and
    3. Schuringa JJ
    : ELMO1 is upregulated in AML CD34+ stem/progenitor cells, mediates chemotaxis and predicts poor prognosis in normal karyotype AML. PLoS One 9(10): e111568, 2014. PMID: 25360637. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0111568
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Park YL,
    2. Choi JH,
    3. Park SY,
    4. Oh HH,
    5. Kim DH,
    6. Seo YJ,
    7. So JK,
    8. Song K,
    9. Cho MS,
    10. Chung MW,
    11. Hong JY,
    12. Kim KH,
    13. Myung E,
    14. Myung DS,
    15. Cho SB,
    16. Lee WS,
    17. Park D and
    18. Joo YE
    : Engulfment and cell motility 1 promotes tumor progression via the modulation of tumor cell survival in gastric cancer. Am J Transl Res 12(12): 7797-7811, 2020. PMID: 33437361.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Peng HY,
    2. Yu QF,
    3. Shen W,
    4. Guo CM,
    5. Li Z,
    6. Zhou XY,
    7. Zhou NJ,
    8. Min WP and
    9. Gao D
    : Knockdown of ELMO3 suppresses growth, invasion and metastasis of colorectal cancer. Int J Mol Sci 17(12): 2119, 2016. PMID: 27999268. DOI: 10.3390/ijms17122119
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Hu Y,
    2. Yu Q,
    3. Zhong Y,
    4. Shen W,
    5. Zhou X,
    6. Liu X,
    7. Xu M,
    8. Zhou N,
    9. Min W and
    10. Gao D
    : Silencing ELMO3 inhibits the growth, invasion, and metastasis of gastric cancer. Biomed Res Int 2018: 3764032, 2018. PMID: 30345300. DOI: 10.1155/2018/3764032
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Pan C,
    2. Zhang Y,
    3. Meng Q,
    4. Dai G,
    5. Jiang Z and
    6. Bao H
    : Down regulation of the expression of ELMO3 by COX2 inhibitor suppresses tumor growth and metastasis in non-small-cell lung cancer. Front Oncol 9: 363, 2019. PMID: 31134158. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00363
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Amin MB,
    2. Edge SB,
    3. Greene FL,
    4. Byrd DR,
    5. Brookland RK,
    6. Washington MK,
    7. Gershenwald JE,
    8. Compton CC,
    9. Hess KR and
    10. Sullivan DC
    : AJCC cancer staging manual. Cham, Switzerland, Springer International Publishing, pp. 113-123, 2018.
  19. ↵
    1. Obeng E
    : Apoptosis (programmed cell death) and its signals - A review. Braz J Biol 81(4): 1133-1143, 2021. PMID: 33111928. DOI: 10.1590/1519-6984.228437
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. D’Arcy MS
    : Cell death: a review of the major forms of apoptosis, necrosis and autophagy. Cell Biol Int 43(6): 582-592, 2019. PMID: 30958602. DOI: 10.1002/cbin.11137
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Liu J,
    2. Peng Y and
    3. Wei W
    : Cell cycle on the crossroad of tumorigenesis and cancer therapy. Trends Cell Biol 32(1): 30-44, 2022. PMID: 34304958. DOI: 10.1016/j.tcb.2021.07.001
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Amoedo ND,
    2. El-Bacha T,
    3. Rodrigues MF and
    4. Rumjanek FD
    : Cell cycle and energy metabolism in tumor cells: strategies for drug therapy. Recent Pat Anticancer Drug Discov 6(1): 15-25, 2011. PMID: 21110821. DOI: 10.2174/157489211793980006
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Bauer TM,
    2. Patel MR and
    3. Infante JR
    : Targeting PI3 kinase in cancer. Pharmacol Ther 146: 53-60, 2015. PMID: 25240910. DOI: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2014.09.006
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Luo J
    : Glycogen synthase kinase 3beta (GSK3beta) in tumorigenesis and cancer chemotherapy. Cancer Lett 273(2): 194-200, 2009. PMID: 18606491. DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2008.05.045
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Erami Z,
    2. Khalil BD,
    3. Salloum G,
    4. Yao Y,
    5. LoPiccolo J,
    6. Shymanets A,
    7. Nürnberg B,
    8. Bresnick AR and
    9. Backer JM
    : Rac1-stimulated macropinocytosis enhances Gβγ activation of PI3Kβ. Biochem J 474(23): 3903-3914, 2017. PMID: 29046393. DOI: 10.1042/BCJ20170279
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    1. Gagliardi PA,
    2. Puliafito A and
    3. Primo L
    : PDK1: At the crossroad of cancer signaling pathways. Semin Cancer Biol 48: 27-35, 2018. PMID: 28473254. DOI: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2017.04.014
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Atas E,
    2. Oberhuber M and
    3. Kenner L
    : The implications of PDK1-4 on tumor energy metabolism, aggressiveness and therapy resistance. Front Oncol 10: 583217, 2020. PMID: 33384955. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.583217
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research: 42 (11)
Anticancer Research
Vol. 42, Issue 11
November 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Engulfment and Cell Motility 1 (ELMO1) Regulates Tumor Cell Behavior and Predicts Prognosis in Colorectal Cancer
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Engulfment and Cell Motility 1 (ELMO1) Regulates Tumor Cell Behavior and Predicts Prognosis in Colorectal Cancer
YOUNG-LAN PARK, SUNG-BUM CHO, SUN-YOUNG PARK, HYUNG-HOON OH, EUN MYUNG, CHAN-MUK IM, SEYEONG SON, SEUNGHEE KIM, SEO-YEON CHO, MIN-WOO CHUNG, JI-YUN HONG, KI-HYUN KIM, DAE-SEONG MYUNG, WAN-SIK LEE, DAEHO PARK, YOUNG-EUN JOO
Anticancer Research Nov 2022, 42 (11) 5343-5355; DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.16058

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Engulfment and Cell Motility 1 (ELMO1) Regulates Tumor Cell Behavior and Predicts Prognosis in Colorectal Cancer
YOUNG-LAN PARK, SUNG-BUM CHO, SUN-YOUNG PARK, HYUNG-HOON OH, EUN MYUNG, CHAN-MUK IM, SEYEONG SON, SEUNGHEE KIM, SEO-YEON CHO, MIN-WOO CHUNG, JI-YUN HONG, KI-HYUN KIM, DAE-SEONG MYUNG, WAN-SIK LEE, DAEHO PARK, YOUNG-EUN JOO
Anticancer Research Nov 2022, 42 (11) 5343-5355; DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.16058
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

  • Role of Mir-452-5p Overexpression in Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition (EMT) in Early-stage Colorectal Cancer
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Methionine Restriction, Not Cysteine Restriction, Is a Cancer-specific Vulnerability
  • Estimation of Tumor Control Probability of Carbon Ion Radiotherapy Using Cancer Type-specific Sensitivity Data
  • Andrographolide Induces Mitochondrial Dysfunction and Alters Stemness-related Gene Expression in MCF7 Breast Cancer Cells
Show more Experimental Studies

Keywords

  • ELMO1
  • oncogenic phenotype
  • prognosis
  • tumor progression
  • colorectal neoplasm
Anticancer Research

© 2026 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire