Abstract
Background/Aim: Bone metastasis commonly causes severe pain. Nerve growth factor (NGF) contributes to pain, and promotes the production of pain-associated neuropeptides, such as calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), from sensory nerve endings. We hypothesized that breast cancer cells have NGF levels that promote axonal growth from dorsal root ganglia (DRGs) neurons, and increase their CGRP production associated with pain from spinal metastases. Materials and Methods: Expression of NGF by the cultured rat breast adenocarcinoma cell line CRL-1666 was determined using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). We constructed a rat model of spinal metastasis by implanting CRL-1666 into L6 vertebrae and determined the change in CGRP expression in DRG neurons innervating vertebrae immunohistochemically. Results: NGF was expressed by CRL-1666. When DRG cells were co-cultured with CRL-1666, there were more CGRP-ir neurons and with a greater average length of axon growth than in cultures without CRL-1666 (p<0.05). In the rat model of metastasis, there were more CGRP-ir DRG neurons innervating vertebra treated with CRL-1666 than in vertebrae from sham surgery control rats (p<0.05). Conclusion: NGF from breast cancer may mediate spinal bone pain from metastasis via axonal growth and up-regulation of pain-associated neuropeptides.
- Axonal growth
- calcitonin gene-related peptide
- dorsal root ganglion neurons
- nerve growth factor
- spinal metastasis
Bone metastasis is a common cause of cancer-related pain that can be severe and progressive. Bone metastases have been identified as sources of pain that are typically not adequately treated, and impairs the quality of life of patients. One of the most common causes of spinal metastasis is breast cancer. In some developed countries, the 5-year relative survival rate of breast cancer patients is better than 80% (1). An increase in survival time may increase the incidence of bone metastasis, which has been found in 69% of patients dying with breast cancer, and bones were the most common sites of first distant metastasis (2). Pain caused by bone metastasis has been reported in >80% of patients with an advanced stage of breast cancer; but, to our knowledge, the pathomechanism of pain has not been fully investigated (3).
The focus of the present study was nerve growth factor (NGF), which is known to mediate and promote pain-related nerve axon growth from dorsal root ganglia (DRG) neurons (4-6). NGF contributes to pain caused by inflammation and nociception (7) and promotes the production of pain-related neuropeptides, such as calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), by sensory nerve endings, and increases numbers of CGRP-ir DRG neurons. NGF can augment transmitter release in sensory neurons by acutely sensitizing sensory neurons with increased CGRP levels. In the present study, the intracellular signaling pathways that mediate these two temporally distinct effects of NGF to augment CGRP release from sensory neurons were examined (8). Rat lumbar vertebrae are innervated by CGRP-ir DRG neurons (9). CGRP may cause hyperalgesia via both protein kinase A and C second-messenger pathways; thus, elevated CGRP expression and release causes pain (10).
We hypothesized that the pathophysiology of pain related to spinal metastasis is that breast cancer cells can produce NGF to promote the growth of nerve axons from CGRP-ir DRG neurons, and increase the number of these neurons by increasing nerve growth. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the expression of the NGF by breast cancer cells, to determine whether CGRP expression by DRG neurons is increased, and whether axonal growth from CGRP-ir DRG neurons is promoted both in vitro and in a model of spinal bone metastasis in vivo.
Materials and Methods
ELISA of NGF. RL-1666 were cultured in McCoy’s 5A medium in a 10-cm dish. The medium was changed every two days. When CRL-1666 grew to 100% confluency, the protein in the cultured cells was extracted using a 3-min Total Protein Extraction Kit (101Bio, San Francisco, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
The supernatant of the cultured CRL-1666 and the protein extracted from the CRL-1666 cells were assayed separately using a ChemiKine NGF Sandwich ELISA Kit (cat. No. CYT304; Chemicon, Temecula, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. In brief, an ELISA plate was coated with a sheep anti-mouse NGF polyclonal antibody and then nonspecific binding sites were blocked. The plates were washed four times and samples were added. The protein extract from the CRL-1666 cells and their supernatants were used as samples, each tested in duplicate. After the samples were added, a specific anti-NGF mouse monoclonal antibody was added to bind the captured NGF. After washing four times, the amount of specifically bound monoclonal antibody was detected using diluted donkey anti-mouse IgG polyclonal antibody conjugated to horseradish peroxidase. The plates were washed and incubated with chromogen before determining the absorbance of the well contents at 450 nm using a microplate reading spectrophotometer.
Cell culture. Cultures of the rat breast adenocarcinoma cell line CRL-1666 were maintained in McCoy’s 5A medium with 1% penicillin and streptomycin and 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS). The cells were incubated in a humidified incubator at 37°C under an atmosphere of 5% CO2 95% air.
Lumbar DRG were harvested from neonatal Wistar rats (P7-P9). DRG cells were collected by centrifugation (1,500 rpm, 5 min) twice. We added 1 ml 0.25% trypsin and 1 μg of DNase I to the DRG cells in Eppendorf tubes and incubated them for 15 min at 37°C. After incubation, the cell mixture was centrifuged (1,500 rpm, 5 min) once. The mixture was triturated, and 10% FBS was added to the mixture in the Eppendorf tube, which was then processed by centrifugation (3,000 rpm, 2 min). The procedure was repeated twice after which the medium was replaced with Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM). This mixture was centrifuged at 3,000 rpm for 2 min, and the procedure was repeated twice (11).
DRG cells were cultured in 2 groups in a chamber slide: (i) 2×103 rat DRG cells were cultured in DMEM medium, (ii) 1×102 CRL-1666 cells and 2×103 rat DRG cells were cocultured in DMEM. We added 10 μl of B-27 Supplement 50× (Gibco Invitrogen, Grand Island, NY, USA) in both groups. The cells were then cultured for 24 h in a humidified incubator at 37°C under an atmosphere of 5% CO2 95% air. We cultured DRG cells without CRL-1666 as a control.
Tuj-1 and CGRP immunocytochemistry. Following the culture procedure, the DRG cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 min at room temperature and washed with phosphate buffered saline (PBS) three times for 5 min. DRG cells were immersed in 0.3% Triton X-100 (5% BSA + 10% Triton X-100) for 10 min and in 5% BSA for 30 min. For immunocytochemistry, the cells were labeled with an antibody to the neuronal marker β-tubulin (Tuj-1; mouse monoclonal antibody against neuronal class III β-tubulin; 1:800; Covance, Emeryville, CA, USA) and with rabbit antibodies to CGRP (1:1,000; Immunostar, Hudson, WI, USA) that were diluted with a blocking solution. After incubation with the Tuj-1 and CGRP specific antibodies for 20 h at 4°C, cells were double stained with species-specific antibodies conjugated to fluorescent dyes: Alexa 488-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (as a marker of Tuj-1 immunoreactivity, 1:1,000; Invitrogen, Eugene, OR, USA) and Alexa 594-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (1:1,000; Invitrogen, Eugene, OR, USA). After each step, the fixed cells were rinsed three times in PBS. The cells were then observed using a fluorescence microscope.
Proportion of CGRP-ir cells, number of growing axons, and average axonal length. The proportion of the CGRP-ir DRG neurons to Tuj-1-ir neurons, and the number of axons growing from the CGRP and Tuj-1 double-stained DRG neurons were determined for both DRG cells cultured alone and those cocultured with CRL-1666. We determined the number of CGRP-ir DRG neurons and average length of axon growth from 100 CGRP-ir and Tuj-1-ir DRG neurons. All measurements were made using ImageJ (NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA).
A rat model of spinal metastasis and retrograde Fluoro-Gold labeling. All animal procedures and protocols were approved by the IRB of the authors’ affiliated Institution and were conducted according to the National Institutes of Health Guidelines for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (1996 revision).
We used a rat model of spinal metastasis reported by Mantha et al. (12). We used 36 female, 8-week-old Sprague Dawley (SD) rats weighing 200-250 g. They were anesthetized with a mixture of 0.15 mg/kg body weight (b.w.) medetomidine, 2.0 mg/kg b.w. midazolam, and 2.5 mg/kg b.w. butorphanol and treated aseptically throughout the surgery. We made a dorsal midline longitudinal incision to expose the L6 vertebra under a microscope, and then drilled a hole 1 mm left from the midline with an 18-gauge needle to a depth of 1.5 mm. Subsequently, in 18 rats (control group), FG was placed in the hole using a 26-gauge needle whose tip was filled with Fluoro-Gold crystals (FG; Fluorochrome, Denver, CO, USA). In 18 other rats, FG was placed in the hole and a tumor block (1 mm × 1 mm × 1 mm) implanted with microsurgical instruments (metastasis group). The tumor block had been excised from a donor rat with a subcutaneous tumor of CRL-1666 (11). After applying the FG or implanting the tumor and applying the FG, the hole was sealed with Bone Wax (Lukens Corp., Richmond, VA, USA) and both the fascia and skin were closed in rats of both groups.
On the 7th day after applying the FG alone or together with the implanted tumor block, the rats were anesthetized with the mixture of 0.15 mg/kg body weight (b.w.) medetomidine, 2.0 mg/kg b.w. midazolam, and 2.5 mg/kg b.w. butorphanol, and perfused transcardially with 0.9% saline, followed by 500 ml of 4% paraformaldehyde in phosphate buffer (0.1 M, pH 7.4). Bilateral DRG from L1 to L6 were resected and fixed by soaking in 4% paraformaldehyde in phosphate buffer overnight at 4°C. The fixed DRG were immersed in 20% sucrose in 0.01 M phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) for 20 h at 4°C for cryoprotection. Subsequently, each DRG was sliced at 20 μm thickness on a cryostat and sections mounted on poly-L-lysine-coated slides.
Immunohistochemistry for CGRP. The mounted sections were incubated in a solution (PBS containing 0.3% Triton X-100 and 3% skim milk) to block nonspecific binding sites for 90 min at room temperature. Next, the sections were processed for CGRP immunohistochemistry by incubating them with rabbit antibodies to CGRP (1:1,000; Immunostar) for 20 h at 4°C, followed by incubation with goat anti-rabbit Alexa 488-fluorescein-conjugated antibody (1:400; Molecular Probes). The fluorescent marker was observed using a fluorescence microscope (Olympus, Sinjuku, Tokyo, Japan). We counted the numbers of FG-labeled and CGRP-ir DRG cells in control and metastasis groups.
Statistical analyses. All results are expressed as the mean±standard error unless otherwise indicated. Differences in the number of CGRP-ir neurons, and that of axons growing from DRG neurons were determined using the Chi-squared test. Differences in axonal length were determined using Student t tests. Differences in the proportions of FG-labeled and CGRP-ir DRG neurons were determined using Mann–Whitney U-tests. p<0.05 was considered significant.
Results
NGF in CRL-1666 cells by ELISA. The concentration of NGF in the supernatant was 30±2 pg/ml, in the protein extract of CRL-1666 was 120±10 pg/ml, and in McCoy’s 5A medium was below the limit of detection. This finding indicates that the NGF could not be detected in McCoy’s 5A medium, but that it exists at detectable levels in CRL-1666 and that the cells release NGF.
CGRP expression in DRG neurons cocultured with CRL-1666. An average of 20.4±3.2% DRG neurons were CGRP-ir in the cultures without CRL-1666, while an average 39.6±4.7% of DRG neurons were CGRP-ir when cocultured with CRL-1666 (Figures 1 and 2). CGRP-ir was significantly increased when DRG neurons were cocultured with CRL-1666 compared with the CGRP-ir in DRG neurons cultured without CRL-1666 (p<0.05).
Number of growth axons from CGRP-ir and Tuj-1-ir DRG neurons. Significantly more axons (403±32) were found growing from 100 DRG neurons when they were cocultured in DMEM with CRL-1666 than the number of axons (188±19) found growing from 100 DRG neurons when they were cocultured in DMEM without CRL-1666 (p<0.05) (Figure 3).
Axonal length from CGRP and Tuj-1-ir DRG cells. The average length of axons growing from CGRP-ir and TuJ-1-ir DRG neurons co-cultured in DMEM with CRL-1666 (119.85±7.5 μm) was significantly longer than that (25.12±2.7 μm) from DRG neurons cultured in DMEM without CRL-1666 (p<0.05) (Figure 4).
Proportions of FG-labeled and CGRP-ir DRG neurons. FG-labeled DRG neurons were observed from L1 to L6, thus L6 vertebra were innervated from multilevel DRG. The proportions of FG-labeled CGRP-ir DRG neurons in rats in the metastasis group were significantly higher than they were in the sham-surgery control group at every level from L1 to L6 (p<0.05) (Figure 5 and Figure 6).
Discussion
In the present study, CRL-1666 were found to contain NGF and coexistence of CRL-1666 and DRG neurons both in vitro and in the model of metastasis in vivo increased the number of CGRP-ir neurons and axonal growth significantly compared with controls untreated with CRL-1666. These findings may show NGF from breast cancer can mediate the pain of spinal bone metastasis via axonal growth and up-regulation of neuropeptides.
The amount of NGF in the protein extract of CRL-1666 was significantly higher than the undetectable levels in McCoy’s 5A medium alone, and axonal growth was promoted when DRG neurons were co-cultured with CRL-1666. NGF was discovered as a member of the neurotrophin family (13) and is produced by every peripheral tissue and organ (14). Some cancer cells, such as gastric cancer cells (15) and hepatocellular carcinoma cells (16) produce NGF. In the present study, we found that the rat breast adenocarcinoma cells produce NGF.
We hypothesized that NGF causes the pain resulting from breast cancer metastasis to the spinal column. Halvorson et al. reported that administering an antibody to block NGF activity reduced pain from bone cancer, but the mechanisms that led to the pain reduction are not completely clear. Sevcik et al. reported that anti-NGF therapy reduced pain in a mouse model of femur cancer, effectively decreasing the neurochemical changes associated with peripheral and central sensitization (17). Several authors have argued that NGF and nerve growth from DRG are closely associated with low back pain (18). NGF is also considered to induce bone pain by activating and sensitizing nociceptors in bone (19). The results of the present study support the hypothesis that NGF and nerve growth are causes of pain associated with metastasis of breast cancer to the spine.
The number of CGRP-ir DRG neurons increased when DRG cells were co-cultured with CRL-1666 in vitro and when tumor explants were implanted into vertebrae in vivo. CGRP is widely distributed in the peripheral and central nervous systems, and CGRP receptors exist in nociceptive pathways (20). CGRP is involved in the development of neurogenic inflammation, and is up-regulated under conditions of inflammatory and neuropathic pain (20). Most likely, CGRP facilitates nociceptive transmission and contributes to the development and maintenance of a sensitized, hyper-responsive state of primary afferent sensory neurons and of the second-order neurons in nociceptive pathways within the central nervous system, thus contributing to central sensitization (21). CGRP-ir nerve fibers exist in the vertebrae and DRG (22) and CGRP-ir DRG neurons dominantly innervate structures, such as vertebrae, located in the thick layers of the body (23). The present study suggests that CGRP-ir nerve fibers are involved in the pathophysiology of pain resulting from spinal metastasis. Several authors have reported that the pathological sprouting of sensory nerve fibers at the tumor– bone interface results from reactive astrocytosis in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord in models of cancer-induced bone pain. CGRP-ir fibers observed sprouting in bones are associated with an increase in CGRP content in sensory neuron cell bodies in the DRG and an increase in the basal and activity-evoked release of CGRP from their central terminals in the dorsal horn (24). The elevated CGRP expression in DRG neurons observed in the present study could be responsible for the pathophysiological mechanisms of pain. Considering the relationship between NGF and CGRP is also important. NGF regulates the expression and release of CGRP (8, 25), and the present study supports this finding. The NGF produced by CRL-1666 may promote CGRP expression and axonal growth. CGRP and the NGF sensitize trigeminal neurons to transmit nociceptive signals to the brainstem, so our findings may lead to pain from spinal metastasis (26).
The most important discovery in the present study is that the number of FG-labeled CGRP-ir DRG neurons was significantly increased in the metastasis group at every level from L1 to L6. This observation is important because the pain of bone metastasis is previously thought to be related to only a specific level of DRG. In clinical practice, nerve root block at a specific level is a common pain treatment for patients with spinal metastasis. However, considering the results of current study, nerve root block of a specific level may be insufficient for the pain due to spinal metastasis. Considering the findings described above, inhibiting NGF may be more effective in the treatment of metastasis-related pain than we expected. NGF blockade has not been shown to influence cancer progression (17), and most NGF blockade causes only mild to moderate adverse events (27). NGF is soon expected to be used as a new treatment for pain caused by spinal metastases.
The current study has certain limitations. We did not compare the pain-related behavior of rats in the control and metastasis groups. Low back muscle pain can be evaluated in rats using a CatWalk gait analysis system (28). We attempted to evaluate pain-related behavior using a CatWalk system, but the rats in the model of metastasis showed a decrease in activity due to the possible pain or motor dysfunction that was so substantial that the evaluation could not be completed. Considering that the primary purpose of the current study was to investigate the pathophysiological mechanisms of pain related to spinal metastasis, we have limited the discussion to the possible relationship between NGF and CGRP, and pain. In conclusion, NGF from breast cancer may mediate the bone pain of spinal metastasis via axonal growth and CGRP expression.
Footnotes
Authors’ Contributions
AM wrote and prepared the manuscript, AM and KY developed the study design and conducted the study, and all of the authors participated in the study design. All Authors have read, reviewed, and approved the article.
Conflicts of Interest
The Authors declare no conflicts of interest.
- Received September 28, 2021.
- Revision received October 24, 2021.
- Accepted November 15, 2021.
- Copyright © 2022 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.