Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues 2025
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues 2025
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleClinical Studies

Expression of Surface-associated 82 kDa proMMP-9 in Lymphatic Leukemia Blast Cells Differentially Correlates With Prognosis

JOERG SCHMOHL, SABINE MOEBIUS, THOMAS GUENTHER, ELENA PEPELDJYIKA, CORINNA L. SEIDEL, WISHNU SUTANTO, FRIEDHELM SCHUSTER, DORIS KRAEMER, HELMUT SALIH, AMELY HARTMANN, JOHANNA TISCHER, CHRISTIAN RIES and HELGA SCHMETZER
Anticancer Research August 2021, 41 (8) 3891-3898; DOI: https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.15184
JOERG SCHMOHL
1Department of Hematology and Oncology, Diakonie Hospital Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
SABINE MOEBIUS
2Department for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, Medical Department 3, University Hospital of Munich, Munich, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
THOMAS GUENTHER
2Department for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, Medical Department 3, University Hospital of Munich, Munich, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
ELENA PEPELDJYIKA
2Department for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, Medical Department 3, University Hospital of Munich, Munich, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
CORINNA L. SEIDEL
3Department of Orthodontics and Orofacial Orthopedics, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen and Friedrich-Alexander Universität (FAU) Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
WISHNU SUTANTO
2Department for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, Medical Department 3, University Hospital of Munich, Munich, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
FRIEDHELM SCHUSTER
4Department for Paediatric Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital of Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DORIS KRAEMER
5Department of Haematology, Oncology and Palliative Care, Kath. Krankenhaus Hagen gem. GmbH, St.-Josefs-Hospital, Hagen, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
HELMUT SALIH
6Clinical Collaboration Unit Translational Immunology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Tuebingen 3, Tübingen, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
AMELY HARTMANN
7Praxis Dr. Seiler, Private Practice for Oral Surgery, Filderstadt, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
JOHANNA TISCHER
2Department for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, Medical Department 3, University Hospital of Munich, Munich, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
CHRISTIAN RIES
8University Hospital of Munich, Institute for Cardiovascular Prevention, Munich, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
HELGA SCHMETZER
2Department for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, Medical Department 3, University Hospital of Munich, Munich, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: helga.schmetzer{at}med.uni-muenchen.de
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background/Aim: Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) degrade extracellular matrix and process regulatory proteins. Recently, a membrane-bound 82kDa variant of proMMP-9 identified on myeloid blasts was shown to be associated with prognosis. Patients and Methods: To investigate the role of 82kDa proMMP-9 with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and chronic lymphoid leukemia (CLL), we performed flow-cytometry analysis of expression on ALL blasts (n=18) and CLL lymphocytes (n=21) from blood and correlated data with clinical parameters. Results: In ALL, mature B-linear blasts expressed higher levels of 82kDa proMMP-9 compared to T-linear blasts. Elevated levels of 82kDa proMMP-9 were found in elderly patients and at patients with relapse. No correlation was observed on blood cells and extramedullary disease. In CLL, the 82kDa proMMP-9 expression did not correlate with any of the clinical parameters. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that higher levels of 82kDa proMMP-9 expression on blast cells may correlate with a more unfavorable ALL-subtype. Further studies are required to clarify the prognostic role of the 82kDa pro-MMP-9 expression.

Key Words:
  • MMP-9
  • CLL
  • ALL
  • leukemia
  • prognosis

Leukemia is characterized by uncontrolled proliferation of hematopoietic cells that lack the ability to differentiate into mature blood cells (1). Acute leukemias are diseases characterized by a clonal expansion of myeloid/ lymphoid precursor cells with impaired differentiation and a replacement of the remaining hematopoiesis resulting in clinical symptoms like fever, infections or bleeding complications. Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) occurs in children and elderly patients. Extramedullary infiltrations especially affects the central nervous system, but can also occur in other organs (2). Treatment of ALL depends on age and classification into risk groups of patients. In general, therapy is characterized by an induction- and a post-remission therapy that often includes allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (SCT) (2, 3). Childhood ALL is treated with SCT only in case of a bad cytogenetic risk or in case of relapse (2, 4). Whereas a t(9;22) (Philadelphia chromosome) with the corresponding fusion gene BCR-ABL is the most adverse condition in adult patients(2), it is predictive for a better outcome in children between 1 and 9 years of age (5, 6).

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is the most common chronic leukemia in older age. Median patient age is 65 years at first diagnosis (7). This disease is characterized by an accumulation of small, mature B-cells in blood and bone marrow due to defects in apoptosis and also a clonal proliferation of these cells (8, 9). Treatment of patients is individualized and depends on the physical condition as well as the classification according to the Binet staging system. Patients in Binet stage A and B only receive chemotherapy in case of progression and symptomatic disease, patients in Binet C stage regularly receive chemotherapy or even a SCT in refractory conditions. Del(13q14), found in approximately 55% of all patients, correlates with a favorable outcome whereas del(17p) predicts an unfavorable prognosis (10).

In addition, leukemic blast cells from patients with ALL and CLL blast crisis can be found in the bone marrow (BM) and in the peripheral blood (PB). Besides that, blasts can frequently infiltrate different organs. This cellular trafficking within different body compartments, that is normally restricted to mature functional leukocytes, requires cells to migrate through matrix barriers and penetrate blood vessel walls. This ability by the cells is facilitated by the proteolytic degradation of extracellular matrix and basement membranes that is mediated by matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), a family of structurally and functionally related proteolytic enzymes (11). Among them, MMP-9 efficiently degrades denatured collagens (gelatin) and collagen type IV, the major component of basement membranes. In addition to its degradative potential, MMP-9 has the ability to process a variety of biologically active molecules including transformation of growth factor β, interleukin 8 and interleukin 1β into their biologically active forms (12-14), indicating importance of MMP-9 as a regulator of cellular functions. These properties have implicated MMP-9 in numerous physiological and pathological processes including leukocyte migration and tumor cell metastasis, respectively (12). Dysregulated expression of MMP-9 also contributes to the invasiveness of many hematologic malignancies such as myelomonocytic leukemias (15).

Under physiological conditions, MMP-9 is secreted from the cells in the form of a latent 94 kDa proenzyme that requires activation to exert its proteolytic activity which is counterbalanced by interaction with the natural tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases (TIMPs) (16). Cell surface association of MMP-9 has been documented in various cell types including leukocytes and leukemic cells (17). In CLL, surface-bound MMP-9 regulates CLL cell invasion through basement membranes and trans-endothelial migration (18). In disseminating anaplastic large cell lymphomas, surface association and activity of MMP-9 contributes to the invasiveness of the lymphoma cells (19).

Our previous studies in AML cells have led to the discovery that the major MMP-9 form on the surface of the blast cells is a unique non-secreted 82 kDa variant of proMMP-9 (20). This particular 82 kDa proMMP-9 has structural and functional differences when compared to the ‘regular’ proMMP-9, indicating a specific role for the 82 kDa proMMP-9 in surface-associated proteolysis. Most remarkably, once activated, the 82 kDa proMMP-9 is only poorly inhibited by TIMP-1 (20). Thus, overexpression of this TIMP-1-insensitive MMP-9 variant on the surface of malignantly transformed cells may increase pericellular proteolysis and thereby promote cancer progression in vivo.

By use of a monoclonal antibody that specifically recognizes the aberrant 82 kDa proMMP-9 form, our studies demonstrated that surface expression of this species on blast cells from PB represents a novel independent marker of prognosis in patients with AML (21). In the present study, we analyzed the surface expression of 82 kDa proMMP-9 of mononuclear cells isolated from the BM or PB from patients with ALL and CLL to correlate our findings with disease related prognosis.

Patients and Methods

Patient characteristics, diagnosis and treatment. We studied the expression profiles of PB-cells from patients with ALL (n=18) and CLL (n=21) in blast/lymphocyte-rich phases of the disease and in addition some selected PB-samples from AML patients (n=6). The average age of ALL patients was 22 years (range=3-50 years), and of CLL patients 57 years (range=33-72 years). The female to male ratio was 1:0.6 in ALL and 1:0.9 in the group of CLL patients. According to the European Group for the immunological classification of leukemias (EGIL), ALL patients were classified in pro-B-acute lymphocytic leukemias (BI, n=1), common acute lymphocytic leukemias (BII, n=5), and pre-B-acute lymphocytic leukemias (BIII, n=2). Furthermore, 4 ALL patients characterized by an expression of myeloid surface antigens (My+) were subdivided into My+ cALLs (BII+My, n=3) and a My+-pre-B-ALL (BIII+My, n=1). The group of precursor T-lymphoblastic leukemias was classified into a pro-T-acute lymphoblastic leukemia (TI, n=1), a pre-T-ALL (TII, n=1), cortical-T-acute lymphoblastic leukemia (TIII, n=3) and one mature T-ALL (TIV, n=1). 5 patients presented with a primary ALL and 13 with a secondary ALL. According to the criteria of the Study Group on Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (GMALL), patients were stratified as standard, high and highest risk (Table I). ALL patients were treated by approved therapy standards according to GMALL therapy standards in adults and COALL standards in children (<18 years of age). All CLL patients had been classified as B-CLL and were divided by Binet classification into Binet A (n=14), B (n=6) and C (n=1) risk groups. CLL pts were treated by approved therapy standards according to comorbidity and pretreatment with Rituximab±Bendamustin, KNOSPE (Chlorambucil+Prednisolone), Rituximab-CHOP (Cyclophosphamid, Adriamycin, Vincristin, Prednisolone), Alemtuzumab or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. The composition of mononuclear cells (MNC) in ALL samples was: 8% B-cells (range=3-11%), 14% T-cells (range=5-33%), 5% monocytes (range=1-29%), 4% Natural Killer (NK)-cells (range=1-13%) and 71% blasts (Bla) (range=17-99%). The composition of MNC in CLL samples was: 11% T-cells (range=1-60%), 4% monocytes (range=1-25%), 1% NK-cells (range=0-6%) and 85% (leukemic) B-cells (range=32-98%). Analyses of B-cells, T-cells, monocytes and NK-cells for co-expression of MMP9 were only included if more than 2% of B-cells, T-cells, monocytes or NK-cells, respectively could be analyzed. All samples with an aberrant expression of cluster of differentiation (CD) 3, CD14, CD19 and CD56 on ALL blasts were excluded from analyses to evaluate cellular compositions (Table I).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

Patient and sample characteristics.

Extramedullary infiltrations. Extramedullary infiltration in pts with acute leukemia was considered after occurrence of any biopsy-confirmed manifestation of extramedullar leukemic infiltrates. Hepatosplenomegaly and lymphadenopathy were not considered as manifestations of extramedullary diseases in this study. Leptomeningeal disease was only considered as extramedullary infiltration in case of positive cerebrospinal fluid cytology. One ALL patient showed lung and renal blast infiltrations, one patient presented with blast infiltrations in the bone and skin and in one patient the localization was not further documented.

Sample collection and preparation. After informed consent was obtained, PB or BM (in ALL cases) samples were collected from healthy volunteers and from patients with ALL or CLL at the University Hospitals of Tuebingen, Duesseldorf or Munich. MNC were separated by density gradient centrifugation using the Ficoll-Hypaque-technique [Biocoll Separating solution® (Biochrom, Berlin, Germany)] with a density gradient of 1.077 g/ml, washed in phosphate buffered saline [Dulbecco’s PBS® (PAA, Coelbe, Germany)] and subsequently frozen in liquid nitrogen according to standard procedures. Shortly before analysis, cells were thawed, washed in PBS and counted using a Neubauer counting chamber. Alternatively, fresh MNC were directly analyzed.

Monoclonal antibodies recognizing the 82 kDa proMMP-9. Mouse monoclonal antibodies directed against the N-terminus of the human 82 kDa proMMP-9 were generated as described previously and labeled by conjugation with DyLight488 by the manufacturer (AbD Serotec/Morphosys, Duesseldorf, Germany) (20, 21). A detailed characterization of the antibody IF-6G10 recognizing the 82 kDa proMMP-9 variant has been performed; no cross reactivity against MMP-2, 3, 1, 4 and TIMP-1 or 2 was observed, while its specificity in complex protein mixtures as well as its capability to differentiate between 82 kDa proMMP-9 expressing or non-expressing cells has been shown previously (22).

Cell characterization by flow cytometry. Cellular compositions as well as surface marker profiles were analyzed with monoclonal mouse anti-human antibodies (moAbs) using flow cytometry. The moAbs were conjugated with Fluorescein isothiocyanat (FITC), phycoerythrin (PE), tandem Cy7-PE conjugation (PCy7) and allophycocyanin (APC). All antibodies were delivered by Becton Dickinson, Heidelberg, Germany (a), Caltag, Darmstadt, Germany (b), Immunotech/Beckman Coulter, Krefeld, Germany (c), Miltenyi Biotech, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany (d) and Bioscience, Heidelberg, Germany (e). We used FITC labeled antibodies for CD3c and CD8a. CD3c was also used as a PE-labeled moAB. MoAbs against CD3c, CD4c, CD5c, CD15a, CD19c, CD33c, CD34c were conjugated with PCy7. MoAbs against CD1ab, CD3c, CD4a, CD7e, CD10c, CD13b, CD14c, CD15a, CD19c, CD20c, CD45ROb, CD56c and CD235aa were labeled with APC. The moABs IF-6G10 and IE-5E9 that detect 82 and 94 kDa proMMP-9, respectively, were conjugated with DyLight 488 (AbD Serotec/Morphosys, Duesseldorf, Germany). For analysis of fresh or thawed MNC and cell lines, the cells were suspended in 0.7-1 ml of PBS containing 10% fetal calf serum (Biochrome, Berlin, Germany) and incubated with four different moAbs at different combinations for 15 minutes in the dark, according to manufacturer’s instructions. After washing, the cells were centrifuged (7 min at 370 g) and resuspended in 200 μl of PBS. After all staining procedures, 5,000 cells per tube were measured with a FACS Calibur® Flow Cytometer (Becton Dickinson, Heidelberg, Germany) and different cell subsets were quantified by using isotype controls according to a defined gating strategy with the help of Cell Quest data acquisition and analysis software (Becton Dickinson).

Statistical methods. Statistics were calculated using SPSS Statistics v. 20.0 (IBM Corp, Armonk, US). The Shapiro-Wilk’s test was used to check for normal distribution. In case of normally distributed data, a student t-test was performed; in case of non-normally distributed data the Mann-Whitney U-test was applied. Categorical variables were compared by the χ2 test. Correlations were assessed with the use of Spearman correlation coefficients. For step-wise multiple linear regression analysis, log-transformation of covariates was used to approximate a normal distribution. Values are reported as mean and standard deviation.

Results

Expression of 82 kDa proMMP-9 on ALL blast cells. We analyzed the expression of the 82 kDa proMMP-9 on blasts isolated from 18 patients with ALL by flow cytometry. In undifferentiated ALL, we found low expression of this marker on B-linear, but high expression on T-linear ALL blasts (Figure 1A). In differentiated ALL, 82 kDa proMMP-9 expression was significantly higher on blasts from pooled B-linear vs pooled T-linear ALLs (87%±64% vs. 26%±1%, p=0.025, Figure 1B). Expression levels of proMMP-9 on blasts were lower in children at age ≤10 years compared to children >10 years (18%±9% vs. 49%±33%, p=0.12, Figure 1C) and lower in adults at age ≤24 years compared to adults >24 years (12%±4% vs. 39%±38%, p=0.2, Figure 1D).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Expression profiles of surface-associated the 82 kDa proMMP-9 variant on ALL blasts. Low expression of 82 kDA proMMP-9 was found in immature B-ALL and high expression on immature T-ALL. (B) Higher frequencies of the 82 kDa proMMP-9 were detected in positive B-linear (B I-III) vs. T-linear (T I-IV) ALL blasts (excluding immature cases). (C and D) Higher frequencies of 82 kDa proMMP-9 were detected in positive blasts in children as well as elderly adults. (E) Higher frequencies of 82 kDa proMMP-9 positive blasts were found at relapse. Statistical analysis was performed using Wilcoxon test. y: Years; rel: relapse; std: standard; child: children.

Upon sub-classification of cases according to GMALL risk groups, elevated proportions of proMMP-9-positive blasts were found in patients at relapse (48%±40%, n=2) followed by patients in the standard risk prognosis group (28%±27%, n=5) and in the high/highest risk group (25%±32%, n=4) (Figure 1E). In all cases classified and treated according to the COALL protocol for children (n=7), we found no significant differences in proMMP-9 expression levels on blasts (31%±26%, Figure 1E). Sub-classification of patients in male vs. female or into responders and non-responders to induction chemotherapy or immunotherapy [SCT, donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI)] did not reveal differences in the proMMP-9 expression levels (data not shown). Extramedullary disease in either kidney or skin was detected in three patients with ALL. These cases didn’t show a different expression level of proMMP-9 compared to the other patients without extramedullary disease records. Moreover, we did not find correlations between patients’ sex, proMMP-9 expression (data not shown) and analysis of overall survival (lack of occurring deaths). Together, these data suggest that expression of 82 kDa-proMMP-9 is higher on B-ALL vs. T-ALL blasts (excluding undifferentiated ALL cases). Moreover, expression on blasts directly correlated with the cases assigned to adverse (relapse) stages and higher age.

Expression of 82 kDa-proMMP-9 on CLL blasts. Comparative analyses of leukemic lymphocytic cells in patients with CLL did not show significant differences in surface-associated 82 kDa proMMP-9 expression upon subdivision of the pts according to sex and age (data not shown). Expression of proMMP-9 was not different in prognostically relevant CLL subtypes such as Binet risk groups (Binet A vs. Binet B: 10%±3% vs. 8%±3%, p=0.5, Figure 2A). Our cohort contained no cases with Binet C. Dividing cases in responders/ non-responders to first necessary therapy (responders vs non-responders 10%±4% vs. 31%, p=0.23, Figure 2B) and occurrence of Richter Transformation (negative vs. positive: 9%±3% vs. 13%±4%, p=0.24), did not show significant differences in proMMP-9 blast cell expression levels (Figure 2C) suggesting that 82 kDa-proMMP-9 expression levels on mononuclear cells from patients with CLL have no diagnostic and prognostic relevance.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Expression profiles of surface-associated 82 kDa proMMP-9 variant on CLL blasts. (A) 82 kDa proMMP-9 expression and correlation to Binet risk groups A and B. (B) 82 kDa proMMP-9 expression and correlation to patients’ response to therapy. (C) 82 kDa proMMP-9 expression and its correlation to Richter’s transformation. Statistical analysis was performed using Wilcoxon test.

Discussion

We studied the expression of the 82 kDa proMMP-9 on mononuclear lymphatic cells obtained from PB and/or BM of patients with ALL and CLL. By correlating expression profiles with clinically relevant markers, our intent was to test for a potential prognostic value of the 82 kDa proMMP-9 expression in patients with lymphatic leukemia.

ALL and CLL represent heterogenous diseases with various clinical courses. The knowledge of marker expression profiles on cells correspond to defined prognostic subtypes, probabilities to respond to therapy, to survival or to characterizing the migration capacity of leukemic cells. By acquisition of those characteristics, new options can be developed helping to categorize these diseases in distinct risk groups.

In our previous work, we showed that high surface expression of the 82 kDa proMMP-9 on AML-blasts correlated with favorable disease subtypes and a beneficial patient outcome (21). Remarkably, patients with favorable risk groups (according to the NCCN® guidelines) as well as responders to therapy significantly correlated with higher expression of the 82 kDa proMMP-9. Furthermore, we were able to define a cut-off value of 11.5% of blasts with co-expression of 82 kDa proMMP-9 that allowed a significant separation of cases into those with favorable or unfavorable prognosis. In addition, Kaplan-Meier analyses showed a correlation with a higher probability of event free survival for patients with an expression rate >11.5 82 kDa proMMP-9 on blasts (21).

Previous studies by other groups have shown that in patients with ALL, high expression of MMP-9 in or on blasts correlated with a poor prognosis (23, 24). Kuittinen et al. described an expression of MMP-9 on BM blasts in 5 of 20 adult ALL patients by using immunoperoxidase staining and identified a trend towards worse survival in these cases (23). Pan et al. found that MMP-9 expression rates were significantly higher in blast cells of patients with an extramedullary infiltration and in high-risk patients, compared to those with standard risk (24), indicating MMP-9 to be marker of poor prognosis in patients with ALL. In our present work, we used antibodies that specifically detect the 82 kDa proMMP-9 variant, in distinction to regular MMP-9. In ALL, our results demonstrate a trend towards higher expression rates of 82 kDa proMMP-9 on PB blasts in prognostically more unfavorable subgroups such as patients suffering from relapse or of higher age. We correlated prognostic parameters with different age groups (children, adults) and ALL-subgroups (immature ALL, mature ALL, B- and T-linear ALL); however, we could not define prognostically predictive cut-off values. Thus, our findings add information to previous results on MMP-9 as a marker of unfavorable prognosis in patients with ALL by suggesting implication of the 82 kDa proMMP-9 variant in this context.

Because MMP-9 is well studied for its involvement in tumor cell metastasis, we hypothesized a role of the 82 kDa proMMP-9 in the extramedullary evasion of ALL blast cells (11). However, our results did not show any correlation between 82 kDa proMMP-9 expression in blasts and their invasive behavior in patients. Obviously, the 82 kDa proMMP-9 is not crucial for degrading extracellular matrix barriers in ALL blasts but may exert a regulatory role on the surface of these cells. The results of our studies showed a low expression of the 82 kDa proMMP-9 on PB blasts in all patients with CLL at stages Binet A and B. Further subdivision into risk groups was not possible due to the low number of cases with poor risk in our patient cohort. These findings are in agreement with previous work by Kamiguti et al. (25) investigating MMP-9 expression in samples of 41 patients with CLL. By separating patients into prognostically relevant Binet groups, they found a significantly higher expression of MMP-9 in patients in Binet stage C compared to the ones in Binet stage A and B, correlating MMP-9 expression with poor prognosis in CLL patients. Consistently, Buggins et al. demonstrated a correlation of MMP-9 complexed with CD38, CD49d and CD44 on B-Lymphocytes in CLL patients with poor prognosis (26), suggesting that MMP-9 plays a central role in the pathophysiology of this disease.

Former studies by other groups have not distinguished between the regular secreted MMP-9 form and the more recently discovered non-secreted 82 kDa proMMP-9 variant associated with the surface of leukemic cells (21). According to our own present and previous results, we speculate that 82 kDa proMMP-9, when expressed on leukemic cells, plays a regulatory role by activating or inactivating cytokines/ chemokines or shedding surface receptors that are essential in the growth and survival of the malignant cells. Considering the impaired inhibition by its natural inhibitor TIMP-1 (21), 82 kDa proMMP-9 activity might considerably affect the behavior of leukemic cells. However, further detailed cellular and molecular investigations are required to understand the molecular functions of this variant on the surface of leukemic cells and its contribution to the pathophysiology of leukemia.

In summary, our findings indicate a prognostic relevance for quantifying the 82 kDa proMMP-9 expression on mononuclear cells from patients with AML and ALL but not CLL. Further studies in larger cohorts of patients covering all subgroups of hematological malignancies and their various clinical courses are required to validate the 82 kDa proMMP-9 as a biomarker in leukemia.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by grants from Deutsche Krebshilfe (111548) (J.S.), the Wilhelm-Sander Stiftung (2002.122.1) (C.R.) and the Institute for Cardiovascular Prevention, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich (9034376) (C.R..).

Footnotes

  • ↵* These Authors contributed equally to this study.

  • Authors’ Contributions

    H. Schmetzer, H.S., J.S. and C.R. designed and coordinated the study; T.G., W.S., T.K., T.P. and V.E. collected samples and performed the experiments; D.S., T.G., H. Schmetzer, J.S., C.W., E.P. and C.R. analyzed the data; C.L.S. contributed to critical revision, discussion and help with submission; J.S, A.H., C.R. and H. Schmetzer wrote the paper; all Authors approved the final version of the manuscript.

  • Conflicts of Interest

    All Authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding this work.

  • Received May 27, 2021.
  • Revision received June 24, 2021.
  • Accepted June 28, 2021.
  • Copyright © 2021 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Sawyers CL,
    2. Denny CT and
    3. Witte ON
    : Leukemia and the disruption of normal hematopoiesis. Cell 64(2): 337-350, 1991. PMID: 1988151. DOI: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90643-d
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Gökbuget N and
    2. Hoelzer D
    : Recent approaches in acute lymphoblastic leukemia in adults. Rev Clin Exp Hematol 6(2): 114-41; discussion 200-2, 2002. PMID: 12196212. DOI: 10.1046/j.1468-0734.2002.00068.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Döhner H,
    2. Estey EH,
    3. Amadori S,
    4. Appelbaum FR,
    5. Büchner T,
    6. Burnett AK,
    7. Dombret H,
    8. Fenaux P,
    9. Grimwade D,
    10. Larson RA,
    11. Lo-Coco F,
    12. Naoe T,
    13. Niederwieser D,
    14. Ossenkoppele GJ,
    15. Sanz MA,
    16. Sierra J,
    17. Tallman MS,
    18. Löwenberg B,
    19. Bloomfield CD and European LeukemiaNet
    : Diagnosis and management of acute myeloid leukemia in adults: recommendations from an international expert panel, on behalf of the European LeukemiaNet. Blood 115(3): 453-474, 2010. PMID: 19880497. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2009-07-235358
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Schrauder A,
    2. von Stackelberg A,
    3. Schrappe M,
    4. Cornish J,
    5. Peters C, ALL-BFM Study Group, EBMT PD WP and I-BFM Study Group
    : Allogeneic hematopoietic SCT in children with ALL: current concepts of ongoing prospective SCT trials. Bone Marrow Transplant 41 Suppl 2: S71-S74, 2008. PMID: 18545248. DOI: 10.1038/bmt.2008.58
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Pui CH and
    2. Evans WE
    : Treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia. N Engl J Med 354(2): 166-178, 2006. PMID: 16407512. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMra052603
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Pui CH,
    2. Relling MV and
    3. Downing JR
    : Acute lymphoblastic leukemia. N Engl J Med 350(15): 1535-1548, 2004. PMID: 15071128. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMra023001
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Rozman C and
    2. Montserrat E
    : Chronic lymphocytic leukemia. N Engl J Med 333(16): 1052-1057, 1995. PMID: 7675049. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199510193331606
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Chiorazzi N
    : Cell proliferation and death: forgotten features of chronic lymphocytic leukemia B cells. Best Pract Res Clin Haematol 20(3): 399-413, 2007. PMID: 17707829. DOI: 10.1016/j.beha.2007.03.007
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Rodríguez-Vicente AE,
    2. Díaz MG and
    3. Hernández-Rivas JM
    : Chronic lymphocytic leukemia: a clinical and molecular heterogenous disease. Cancer Genet 206(3): 49-62, 2013. PMID: 23531595. DOI: 10.1016/j.cancergen.2013.01.003
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Hallek M
    : Chronic lymphocytic leukemia: 2013 update on diagnosis, risk stratification and treatment. Am J Hematol 88(9): 803-816, 2013. PMID: 23720127. DOI: 10.1002/ajh.23491
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Page-McCaw A,
    2. Ewald AJ and
    3. Werb Z
    : Matrix metalloproteinases and the regulation of tissue remodelling. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 8(3): 221-233, 2007. PMID: 17318226. DOI: 10.1038/nrm2125
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Yu Q and
    2. Stamenkovic I
    : Cell surface-localized matrix metalloproteinase-9 proteolytically activates TGF-beta and promotes tumor invasion and angiogenesis. Genes Dev 14(2): 163-176, 2000. PMID: 10652271.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Van den Steen PE,
    2. Proost P,
    3. Wuyts A,
    4. Van Damme J and
    5. Opdenakker G
    : Neutrophil gelatinase B potentiates interleukin-8 tenfold by aminoterminal processing, whereas it degrades CTAP-III, PF-4, and GRO-alpha and leaves RANTES and MCP-2 intact. Blood 96(8): 2673-2681, 2000. PMID: 11023497.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    1. Schönbeck U,
    2. Mach F and
    3. Libby P
    : Generation of biologically active IL-1 beta by matrix metalloproteinases: a novel caspase-1-independent pathway of IL-1 beta processing. J Immunol 161(7): 3340-3346, 1998. PMID: 9759850.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    1. Klein G,
    2. Vellenga E,
    3. Fraaije MW,
    4. Kamps WA and
    5. de Bont ES
    : The possible role of matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-2 and MMP-9 in cancer, e.g. acute leukemia. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 50(2): 87-100, 2004. PMID: 15157658. DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2003.09.001
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Bourboulia D and
    2. Stetler-Stevenson WG
    : Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases (TIMPs): Positive and negative regulators in tumor cell adhesion. Semin Cancer Biol 20(3): 161-168, 2010. PMID: 20470890. DOI: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2010.05.002
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Stefanidakis M and
    2. Koivunen E
    : Cell-surface association between matrix metalloproteinases and integrins: role of the complexes in leukocyte migration and cancer progression. Blood 108(5): 1441-1450, 2006. PMID: 16609063. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2006-02-005363
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    1. Redondo-Muñoz J,
    2. Ugarte-Berzal E,
    3. García-Marco JA,
    4. del Cerro MH,
    5. Van den Steen PE,
    6. Opdenakker G,
    7. Terol MJ and
    8. García-Pardo A
    : Alpha4beta1 integrin and 190-kDa CD44v constitute a cell surface docking complex for gelatinase B/MMP-9 in chronic leukemic but not in normal B cells. Blood 112(1): 169-178, 2008. PMID: 18326820. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2007-08-109249
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    1. Lagarrigue F,
    2. Dupuis-Coronas S,
    3. Ramel D,
    4. Delsol G,
    5. Tronchère H,
    6. Payrastre B and
    7. Gaits-Iacovoni F
    : Matrix metalloproteinase-9 is upregulated in nucleophosmin-anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive anaplastic lymphomas and activated at the cell surface by the chaperone heat shock protein 90 to promote cell invasion. Cancer Res 70(17): 6978-6987, 2010. PMID: 20699364. DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-0861
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    1. Ries C,
    2. Pitsch T,
    3. Mentele R,
    4. Zahler S,
    5. Egea V,
    6. Nagase H and
    7. Jochum M
    : Identification of a novel 82 kDa proMMP-9 species associated with the surface of leukaemic cells: (auto-)catalytic activation and resistance to inhibition by TIMP-1. Biochem J 405(3): 547-558, 2007. PMID: 17489740. DOI: 10.1042/BJ20070191
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    1. Schmohl J,
    2. Santovito D,
    3. Guenther T,
    4. Sutanto W,
    5. Kroell T,
    6. Salih H,
    7. Pitsch T,
    8. Egea V,
    9. Weber C,
    10. Schmetzer H and
    11. Ries C
    : Expression of surface-associated 82kDa-proMMP-9 in primary acute leukemia blast cells inversely correlates with patients’ risk. Exp Hematol 44(5): 358-362.e5, 2016. PMID: 26845021. DOI: 10.1016/j.exphem.2016.01.007
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Ecsedi M,
    2. Schmohl J,
    3. Zeiser R,
    4. Drexler B,
    5. Halter J,
    6. Medinger M,
    7. Duyster J,
    8. Kanz L,
    9. Passweg J,
    10. Finke J,
    11. Bethge W and
    12. Lengerke C
    : Anti-thymocyte globulin-induced hyperbilirubinemia in patients with myelofibrosis undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Ann Hematol 95(10): 1627-1636, 2016. PMID: 27480090. DOI: 10.1007/s00277-016-2758-z
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Kuittinen O,
    2. Savolainen ER,
    3. Koistinen P,
    4. Möttönen M and
    5. Turpeenniemi-Hujanen T
    : MMP-2 and MMP-9 expression in adult and childhood acute lymphatic leukemia (ALL). Leuk Res 25(2): 125-131, 2001. PMID: 11166827. DOI: 10.1016/s0145-2126(00)00104-1
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Pan YX,
    2. Yang L,
    3. Wen SP,
    4. Liu XJ and
    5. Luo JM
    : [Expression and clinical significance of MMP-2 and MMP-9 in B acute lymphoblastic leukemia]. Zhongguo Shi Yan Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi 22(3): 640-643, 2014. PMID: 24989268. DOI: 10.7534/j.issn.1009-2137.2014.03.012
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Kamiguti AS,
    2. Lee ES,
    3. Till KJ,
    4. Harris RJ,
    5. Glenn MA,
    6. Lin K,
    7. Chen HJ,
    8. Zuzel M and
    9. Cawley JC
    : The role of matrix metalloproteinase 9 in the pathogenesis of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. Br J Haematol 125(2): 128-140, 2004. PMID: 15059134. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2004.04877.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Buggins AG,
    2. Levi A,
    3. Gohil S,
    4. Fishlock K,
    5. Patten PE,
    6. Calle Y,
    7. Yallop D and
    8. Devereux S
    : Evidence for a macromolecular complex in poor prognosis CLL that contains CD38, CD49d, CD44 and MMP-9. Br J Haematol 154(2): 216-222, 2011. PMID: 21569005. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2011.08725.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research
Vol. 41, Issue 8
August 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Expression of Surface-associated 82 kDa proMMP-9 in Lymphatic Leukemia Blast Cells Differentially Correlates With Prognosis
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
3 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Expression of Surface-associated 82 kDa proMMP-9 in Lymphatic Leukemia Blast Cells Differentially Correlates With Prognosis
JOERG SCHMOHL, SABINE MOEBIUS, THOMAS GUENTHER, ELENA PEPELDJYIKA, CORINNA L. SEIDEL, WISHNU SUTANTO, FRIEDHELM SCHUSTER, DORIS KRAEMER, HELMUT SALIH, AMELY HARTMANN, JOHANNA TISCHER, CHRISTIAN RIES, HELGA SCHMETZER
Anticancer Research Aug 2021, 41 (8) 3891-3898; DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.15184

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Expression of Surface-associated 82 kDa proMMP-9 in Lymphatic Leukemia Blast Cells Differentially Correlates With Prognosis
JOERG SCHMOHL, SABINE MOEBIUS, THOMAS GUENTHER, ELENA PEPELDJYIKA, CORINNA L. SEIDEL, WISHNU SUTANTO, FRIEDHELM SCHUSTER, DORIS KRAEMER, HELMUT SALIH, AMELY HARTMANN, JOHANNA TISCHER, CHRISTIAN RIES, HELGA SCHMETZER
Anticancer Research Aug 2021, 41 (8) 3891-3898; DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.15184
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Patients and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • The Posterior First Approach in Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer Reduces Positive Surgical Margins on the Bladder Neck Side
  • Gamma Knife Radiotherapy of Brain Metastasis Resection Cavities: Outcome Analysis of a Single-center Cohort
  • Efficacy and Safety of Chemoimmunotherapy in Patients With Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer With Pre-existing Interstitial Pneumonia and Low PD-L1 Expression
Show more Clinical Studies

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • MMP-9
  • CLL
  • ALL
  • leukemia
  • prognosis
Anticancer Research

© 2025 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire