Abstract
Background: Osteosarcoma is the most frequent malignant bone neoplasm. The efficacy of combination therapy of a cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitor and a mammalian-target-of-rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor was previously reported in several cancer types. In the present study, we evaluated the efficacy of a combination of palbociclib (CDK 4/6 inhibitor) and everolimus (mTOR inhibitor) on an osteosarcoma patient-derived orthotopic xenograft (PDOX) mouse model. Materials and Methods: osteosarcoma PDOX mouse models were randomized into five treatment groups of seven mice each: Group 1, untreated control; group 2, doxorubicin treatment; group 3, palbociclib treatment; group 4, everolimus treatment; group 5, palbociclib–everolimus combination treatment. Treatment duration was 2 weeks. Results: The palbociclib–everolimus combination reduced the tumor-volume ratio in the osteosarcoma PDOX mouse model compared with the control and doxorubicin (p=0.018). Everolimus alone also inhibited osteosarcoma PDOX growth compared to the control (p=0.04), but less than the combination. Palbociclib alone and doxorubicin were ineffective. There were no significant body-weight losses in any group. Only the palbociclib–everolimus combination induced extensive tumor necrosis observed histopathologically. Conclusion: The present study demonstrated that the combination of CDK4/6 and mTOR inhibitors can be a translatable approach for doxorubicin-resistant osteosarcoma in the clinic.
- Osteosarcoma
- CDK4/6 inhibitor
- palbociclib
- mTOR inhibitor
- everolimus
- patient-derived orthotopic xenograft
- PDOX
- cell cycle
Osteosarcoma is the most frequent and malignant primary bone sarcoma in children and adolescents. Neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy are first-line treatment of osteosarcoma combined with surgery. First-line chemotherapy includes doxorubicin, methotrexate, and cisplatinum. However, second-line chemotherapy for osteosarcoma has limited efficacy and thus drug-resistant osteosarcoma is a recalcitrant disease (1, 2). Therefore, new therapeutic strategies of systemic therapy are necessary for second or later lines of treatment for osteosarcoma.
Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors are candidates for second-line treatment of osteosarcoma (3-5). The CDK4/6 inhibitor palbociclib was approved as a systemic therapy for advanced breast cancer (6). Palbociclib inhibits CDK4/6 from forming a complex with cyclin D, thereby preventing the phosphorylation of retinoblastoma protein and causing cell-cycle arrest (7, 8). An mTOR inhibitor, everolimus, was approved as a therapeutic for advanced breast and renal-cell cancer (9, 10). There are several reports that the combination of CDK4/6 and mTOR inhibitors had efficacy on glioma, breast cancer, and cholangiocarcinoma (3-5). However, there are no reports on the efficacy of a combination of CDK4/6 and mTOR inhibitors on osteosarcoma to our knowledge thus far.
The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of the palbociclib–everolimus (PAL-EVE) combination on a clinically-relevant osteosarcoma patient-derived orthotopic xenograft (PDOX) mouse model, for potential translation to the clinic (11-16).
Materials and Methods
Mice. Athymic nu/nu nude mice (AntiCancer Inc., San Diego, CA, USA), 4-6 weeks old, were used in the present study. Mouse housing, surgical procedures, imaging and sacrifice were performed as described in previous publications (17-20). An AntiCancer Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee-approved protocol was used for all of the studies according to the procedures and principles summarized in the National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, eighth edition, under Public Health Service Approved Animal Welfare Assurance Number A3873-1 (21).
Establishment of the osteosarcoma PDOX mouse model by surgical orthotopic implantation (SOI). A 16-year-old female patient with high-grade osteosarcoma of the left distal femur underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy including doxorubicin and surgery with replacement of the distal femur. One year after surgery, bilateral pulmonary metastases developed (22). Informed consent from the patient and her parents for use of tissue was previously acquired under an Institutional Review Board-approved protocol of University of California, Los Angeles (IRB #10-001857).
A primary osteosarcoma tumor from the left distal femur of the patient was previously established subcutaneously on the back of nude mice (22, 23). The subcutaneously-grown tumors were resected and small fragments were made from them. After nude mice were anesthetized with a ketamine solution, a 10-mm skin incision was made on the lateral side of the right knee. The vastus lateralis muscle was opened and the biceps femoris muscle was split to reach the lateral distal femur. The lateral condyle of the femur was resected with scissors to make a cavity for implantation of the tumor fragment. A single tumor fragment was implanted orthotopically into the cavity of the lateral condyle to establish a PDOX mouse model. The skin was subsequently closed with a 6-0 suture. Please see our previous publications for further details of the surgical orthotopic implantation of osteosarcoma (22, 23).
Therapeutic study design in the osteosarcoma PDOX model. Five groups of seven mice each were randomly assigned from the osteosarcoma PDOX mouse model: Group 1, control treated weekly with phosphate-buffered saline (i.p.); group 2, treated weekly with 3 mg/kg doxorubicin (DOX) (i.p.); group 3, treated daily with 75 mg/kg palbociclib (PAL) by oral gavage; group 4, treated with 5 mg/kg everolimus (EVE) daily by oral gavage; group 5, treated daily with both 75 mg/kg PAL and 5 mg/kg EVE. The therapeutic schedule for the osteosarcoma PDOX mouse model is shown in Figure 1. Treatment duration was for 14 days. The therapeutic doses were determined from previous studies (24-26).
The long and short diameters of the tumor were measured with calipers and body weight was monitored with a digital balance twice a week. Tumor volume was calculated with the following formula: Tumor volume (mm3)=long diameter (mm) × short diameter (mm) × short diameter (mm) × 1/2. The tumor volume ratio was calculated as the tumor volume at each time point relative to the volume of the initial tumor.
Histopathological examination. Resected tumor specimens were fixed in 10% formalin and embedded in paraffin before sectioning and staining. Tissue sections (5 μm) were deparaffinized in xylene and rehydrated in an ethanolic series. Hematoxylin and eosin staining was performed with standard protocols (15).
Statistical analysis. JMP version 13.0 (SAS institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA) was used for statistical analyses. The Steel–Dwass test for tumor- volume ratio and the Tukey–Kramer test for body-weight ratio were used for analysis. Line graphs or bar graphs demonstrate average, and error bars show±standard deviation. A probability value of p≤0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically-significant difference.
Results
Efficacy of the combination of palbociclib (PAL) and everolimus (EVE) on the osteosarcoma PDOX mouse model. Representative photographs of treated mice and tumors resected after treatment are shown in Figure 2. The tumor-volume ratio from the beginning of treatment until the end of treatment is shown in Figure 3.
Tumor-volume ratios at the end of the study were 6.42±1.20 for the untreated-control group; 4.96±1.39 for the doxorubicin-treated group; 4.64±1.88 for the palbociclib-treated group; 3.34±1.23 for the everolimus-treated group; and 2.32±0.52 for the PAL-EVE combination-treated group.
The mice treated with doxorubicin and palbociclib alone showed no significant difference in tumor growth compared with the untreated-control group (p=0.31 and 0.38, respectively). However, the PAL-EVE combination arrested tumor growth significantly compared with untreated-control and doxorubicin-treated mice (p=0.018). Everolimus alone also inhibited tumor growth significantly compared with the control (p=0.04) (Figures 2 and 3).
Histopathology of treated and untreated tumors in the osteosarcoma PDOX mouse model. The untreated-control tumors had a high density of pleomorphic and spindle-shaped cancer cells. as did those in the tumors treated with single agents. However, the PAL-EVE combination resulted in a lower density of cancer cells and had more necrosis compared with all other groups (Figure 4).
Body weight in the osteosarcoma PDOX mouse model. Animal deaths were not observed in any group. Body weight on day 15 relative to body weight at the beginning of the study did not significantly differ among groups. Moreover, there was no body-weight loss in any group (Figure 5).
Discussion
The present study demonstrated that palbociclib alone did not suppress tumor growth significantly compared with other treatments on the osteosarcoma PDOX model. However, the PAL-EVE combination had significant efficacy in the osteosarcoma PDOX mouse model compared with the control and DOX-treated groups. The PAL-EVE combination also resulted in extensive tumor necrosis, as shown by histopathology. No tumor necrosis was found in mice from the other groups. The PAL-EVE combination did not result in treatment-related animal deaths or body-weight loss, which indicates the combination therapy was not toxic, at least at the gross level.
CDK4 was found to be an effective therapeutic target in breast cancer (6, 27). There are some reports of over-expression of CDK4 in osteosarcoma, related to distal metastases and poor prognosis in clinical settings (28, 29). The inhibition of CDK4 in previous studies demonstrated that it is possible to reduce cell proliferation and induce apoptosis via cell-cycle arrest in vitro and in vivo of breast cancer, melanoma and osteosarcoma (29-31). CDK4/6 inhibitors were predicted to have efficacy on osteosarcoma based on these findings. However, the present study showed that monotherapy with the CDK 4/6 inhibitor palbociclib did not inihibit tumor growth significantly on the osteosarcoma PDOX model, compared with other groups.
The combination of a CDK4/6 inhibitor and an mTOR inhibitor was shown to inhibit growth in vitro and in vivo of glioblastoma, malignant pleural mesothelioma, and triple-negative breast cancer (32-34). CDK4/6 inhibition demonstrated down-regulation of down-stream mediators of the mTOR pathway and up-regulation of the phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase/AKT serine/threonine kinase-1/mTOR pathways in several cancer types (32-34). Therefore, we combined in the present study, a CDK4/6 inhibitor with an mTOR inhibitor, in order to overcome resistance to monotherapy with a CDK4/6 inhibitor.
The mTOR inhibitor everolimus was approved as a treatment for advanced breast and renal cell cancer (9, 10). Furthermore, the mTOR-inhibitor rapamycin was reported to down-regulate cyclin D and induce cell-cycle arrest (35). From these findings, a CDK4/6 inhibitor combined with an mTOR inhibitor was predicted to have strong efficacy. In the present study, monotherapy with a CDK4/6 inhibitor did not significantly inhibit osteosarcoma PDOX growth. However, the PAL-EVE combination inhibited osteosarcoma PDOX growth significantly-compared with the untreated control and treatment with doxorubicin. These results suggest that a CDK4/6 inhibitor and an mTOR inhibitor, may have a synergistic effect on induction of cell-cycle arrest.
The main limitation of our study is that expression of CDK4/6 and mTOR in the osteosarcoma PDOX mouse model was not determined. There are several reports that a CDK 4/6 inhibitor demonstrated up-regulation of phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase/AKT serine/threonine kinase-1/mTOR pathways in several cancers (32-35). Therefore, combined inhibition of the CDK 4/6 and mTOR pathways has a possibility as a new therapeutic strategy.
The present study showed that the combination of CDK4/6 and mTOR inhibitors had efficacy in an osteosarcoma PDOX mouse model. Future studies will determine how the level of CDK4/6 and mTOR pathway members affect the response to the PAL-EVE combination in the osteosarcoma PDOX mouse model.
The present study demonstrated that DOX and PAL alone had no efficacy while the PAL-EVE combination had efficacy against a clinically-relevant, doxorubicin-resistant osteosarcoma PDOX mouse model. It should be noted that both the osteosarcoma patient and the osteosarcoma PDOX model derived from the patient were resistant to doxorubicin. The present study suggests the potential clinical translation of combined inhibition of CDK4/6 and mTOR for second-line therapy of osteosarcoma. The present study, along with our recent studies (36-40), demonstrate the power of the PDOX model to identify effective therapy for osteosarcoma.
Acknowledgements
This article is dedicated to the memory of AR Moossa MD, Sun Lee, MD, Professor Li Jia Xi, and Masaki Kitajima, MD.
Footnotes
This article is freely accessible online.
Authors’ Contributions
HO, YT, and RMH wrote this article. YT, SRS, and RMH contributed to the final version of the article. HO, KM, TH, NS, and SRS conceived and planned the experiments. HO performed the experiments. FK and KN supervised this study.
Conflicts of Interest
None declared.
- Received April 22, 2021.
- Revision received May 28, 2021.
- Accepted June 1, 2021.
- Copyright © 2021 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.