Abstract
Background/Aim: Biomarkers for immune-related adverse events (irAEs) induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are required. We encountered a patient whose skin irAE fluctuated in parallel with serum soluble interleukin-2 receptor (sIL-2R). Patients and Methods: We examined 15 patients with cancer who received ICIs. Serum sIL-2R levels before and during ICI treatment were measured. The sIL-2R levels of preserved serum samples from another five patients who developed grade 3 irAEs were measured. Results: Twelve patients showed no significant changes in sIL-2R levels during ICI treatment. Baseline serum sIL-2R levels in three patients increased beyond the normal range before the second cycle. These three patients had grade ≥2 irAEs at the second cycle treatment visit, supporting our hypothesis. Furthermore, at diagnosis of irAEs, the sIL-2R levels of all preserved samples from patients with grade 3 irAEs were significantly elevated. Conclusion: Serum sIL-2R is a promising biomarker for the diagnosis of irAEs.
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) that target programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) were developed as cancer immunotherapy agents (1). Since PD-1 and CTLA-4 are inhibitory immunogenic molecules, ICIs enhance the patients’ immune system to eliminate cancer cells (1). These drugs are effective in treating multiple cancers and have become staples in our arsenal of anti-cancer agents (2). However, stimulating the immune system can cause autoimmune toxicity, called immune-related adverse events (irAEs) (3).
All ICIs can induce irAEs, and the symptoms vary (3). A recent meta-analysis reported that colitis, hypophysitis, and skin rash were more frequent with anti-CTLA-4 antibodies, while pneumonitis, hypothyroidism arthralgia, and vitiligo were more common with anti-PD-1 antibodies (4, 5). Severe irAEs (grade ≥3) have occurred in 28-56% and 21-32% of patients administered with anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 antibodies, respectively (4). ICIs should be discontinued in patients with persistent grade ≥3 irAEs, and these cases may necessitate prolonged administration of high-dose steroids or other immunosuppressive agents to mitigate severe irAEs (3, 6-8). Thus, irAEs pose major impediments to ICI cancer immunotherapy. Although the effective management of severe irAEs is dependent upon early diagnosis and prompt intervention (3, 8), little is known about the risk factors for irAEs, and irAEs remain unpredictable (3, 4). Hence, biomarkers for early diagnosis and disease activity evaluation are required. To date, there are no available biomarkers for irAEs in daily practice.
Serum soluble interleukin-2 receptor (sIL-2R) is considered a marker of lymphocyte (T and B cell)-mediated immune activation, and elevated levels have been recognised as a biomarker for malignant lymphoma, such as non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma and adult T-cell leukaemia/lymphoma (9-11). Serum sIL-2R levels are commonly measured to evaluate the disease state and therapeutic effect, and to detect recurrence in patients with malignant lymphoma in daily practice (9). Recently, we encountered a case in which the skin irAE activity fluctuated in parallel with changes in serum sIL-2R levels in a patient with dual cancer [follicular lymphoma (FL) and melanoma]. Based on this experience, we hypothesised that sIL-2R levels may be a potential biomarker for irAEs and undertook this research. We conducted an exploratory study to evaluate the relationship between fluctuating sIL-2R levels before and during ICI treatment and the occurrence of irAEs.
Patients and Methods
Patients and serum sIL-2R analysis. In this study, patients with malignant diseases received ICI therapy, including anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4 antibody combination therapy (nivolumab and ipilimumab every 3 weeks for four doses) followed by anti-PD-1 antibody monotherapy (nivolumab every 2 weeks) or anti-PD-1 antibody monotherapy (nivolumab every 2 weeks or pembrolizumab every 3 weeks), at Kobe University Hospital between May 2019 and June 2020. Each dose was decided according to the package inserts.
Serum samples were serially collected at pre-treatment, 1 week after the first cycle, and before the second cycle. Serum sIL-2R levels were measured using a chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay (STACIA CLEIA IL-2R, LSI Medience Corp., Japan) in a fully automated immunoassay analyser (STACIA, LSI Medience Corp., Japan) at the Kobe University Hospital Clinical Laboratory. The normal range was defined as 121-613 U/ml, according to the manufacturer’s instructions. We evaluated the clinical manifestations at every hospital visit. The severity of irAEs was graded using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 5.0).
Ethical statements. The study design was approved by the ethics committee of Kobe University Hospital (approval number: 180152). Research was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and Title 45, US Code of Federal Regulations, Part 46, Protection of Human Subjects, effective December 13, 2001. All patients provided written informed consent for the use of their blood samples for research.
Results
Case report. A 67-year-old man, who received chemotherapy treatment for FL (stage IV) 9 years ago, was undergoing regular computed tomography scans and sIL-2R measurements as follow-up care for recurrence every 6 months. During the follow-up period, he was diagnosed with cutaneous melanoma with liver metastasis 1 year ago. Since lymph node swelling and sIL-2R levels were stable, we focused on treating the metastatic melanoma, and he received ICI treatment (nivolumab and ipilimumab) every 3 weeks. After two cycles of ICI treatment, skin rash was noted and a grade 3 skin irAE was diagnosed via biopsy. Notably, the sIL-2R levels, which were analysed periodically for FL follow-up, were elevated after the onset of the irAE, without progression of FL. Systemic corticosteroid therapy improved the skin irAE and reduced sIL-2R levels in parallel (Figure 1). Therefore, we hypothesised that sIL-2R may be a potential biomarker for irAEs and undertook the following investigation.
Clinical course. (Upper) The solid line shows the soluble interleukin-2 receptor level; the black arrows show time points of nivolumab (Nivo) and ipilimumab (Ipi) administration; the white arrow shows the time point of the diagnosis of melanoma; the black box shows systemic corticosteroid treatment; and the diagonal line shows the severity of skin immune-related adverse event (irAE). (Lower) Clinical manifestations of dermatitis at diagnosis of skin irAE.
Fluctuation of serum sIL-2R levels after ICI treatment. To clarify the relationship between the elevation of serum sIL-2R levels after ICI treatment and the occurrence of irAEs, we investigated 15 patients with cancer who received ICI treatment. Five patients were treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab combination therapy and 10 patients were treated with anti-PD-1 antibody monotherapy. In total, three patients developed grade ≥2 irAEs.
Table I shows the clinical characteristics of all 15 patients. Fluctuations in sIL-2R levels among these patients were monitored before and during ICI treatment. Twelve patients without irAEs did not show significant changes in sIL-2R levels during the treatment period. However, increased sIL-2R levels were observed in three patients who had grade ≥2 irAEs [grade 2 thyroid dysfunction (n=2) and grade 3 hepatitis (n=1)] at the second cycle treatment visit, supporting our hypothesis (Figure 2).
Patient characteristics.
Serum soluble interleukin-2 receptor (sIL-2R) levels before and during immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment. Serum sIL-2R levels were measured at pre-treatment, 1 week after the first cycle, and before the second cycle. CTLA-4, Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4; irAE, immune-related adverse event; PD-1, programmed cell death-1.
Next, we calculated the fold-change in sIL-2R levels during the treatment period (Figure 3). Serum sIL-2R levels increased by 3.52-, 4.50-, and 5.82-fold in the three patients who developed irAEs, while the fold-change in sIL-2R levels ranged from 0.99 to 1.71 (median=1.20) in the other 12 patients. Moreover, in these three patients, the fold-change started to increase 1 week after the first cycle, before the diagnosis of an irAE was made.
Fold-changes in serum soluble interleukin-2 receptor (sIL-2R) levels before and during immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment. Fold-changes were calculated at pre-treatment, 1 week after the first cycle, and before the second cycle. CTLA-4, Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4; irAE, immune-related adverse event; PD-1, programmed cell death-1.
sIL-2R levels in cryopreserved serum samples of patients with grade 3 irAEs. Cryopreserved serum samples were obtained from the five patients with grade 3 irAEs at the time of diagnosis. To validate the relationship between sIL-2R levels and irAEs, we measured the sIL-2R levels of these samples, all of which were found to be elevated (Table II).
Serum sIL-2R levels at the time of diagnosis of grade 3 irAEs and clinical characteristics of the other five patients.
Discussion
In this study, elevated sIL-2R levels were observed at the time of diagnosis of irAEs (Figures 1 and 2, Table II). These findings suggest that sIL-2R is related to irAEs. This relationship was observed regardless of the type of irAE. Moreover, the skin irAE activity changed in parallel with sIL-2R levels, as shown in Figure 1. Pathological examination of the skin showed infiltration of many T cells (data not shown). Since sIL-2R is one of the indices of immune activity, we assume that sIL-2R levels also decreased with improvement of irAE. Additionally, fold-changes in sIL-2R levels had begun to increase before irAEs developed, as shown in Figure 3. Based on these findings, we suggest that sIL-2R may be a potential biomarker for evaluating irAE activity and predicting its occurrence.
Few studies have explored and reported candidate biomarkers for irAEs (12-14). Tanaka et al. (12) evaluated fluctuations in multiple cytokines among patients with melanoma treated with nivolumab and showed that increased serum IL-6 levels after administration were related to the development of irAEs. Tarhini et al. (13) revealed that baseline serum IL-17 levels correlated with the development of grade 3 irAEs, specifically diarrhoea/colitis, during neoadjuvant ipilimumab treatment. Because IL-17 levels are elevated in patients with inflammatory bowel disease, this finding is rational. Furthermore, Khan et al. (14) recently reported that patients who developed irAEs exhibited a greater increase in the levels of chemokines CXCL9 and CXCL10 post ICI treatment compared with patients without irAEs. Because these cytokines/chemokines are important regulators of immune activities by recruiting immune cells and promoting inflammation, they are promising biomarkers for irAEs. However, these cytokines have only been measured in cancer immunity research and not in clinical practice.
Serum sIL-2R levels are widely measured in daily practice in patients with malignant lymphoma (9-11), and they were reported to predict the prognosis of patients with follicular lymphoma (15). Additionally, sIL-2R levels have been correlated with various inflammatory diseases, such as viral infections, malignancies (lung and renal cancer), and autoimmune disorders (rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, sarcoidosis, and vasculitis syndrome) (16-20). In terms of the relationship between sIL-2R and irAEs, there is only one case report that correlated sIL-2R levels with the activity of irAE pneumonia (21). Our study demonstrated the relationship between sIL-2R and various types of irAEs. Because this exploratory research had a small sample size, further study is required. However, our study provides important insights into the significance of elevated sIL-2R levels at the time of diagnosis of irAEs. Moreover, measurement of sIL-2R levels may help predict the occurrence and evaluate the disease activity of irAEs. Our findings suggest that sIL-2R levels could be a potential biomarker for irAEs.
Footnotes
Authors’ Contributions
Ryo Takai: Conception, study design, data collection, analysis, interpretation, drafting, and writing of the article; Yohei Funakoshi: conception, study design, data collection, analysis, interpretation, drafting, and writing of the article; Hirotaka Suto: data collection and interpretation; Yoshiaki Nagatani: data collection and interpretation; Yoshinori Imamura: data collection, patient management, and interpretation; Masanori Toyoda: data collection, patient management, and interpretation; Kimikazu Yakushijin: data collection, patient management, and interpretation; Naomi Kiyota: data collection, patient management, and interpretation; Ken-ichi Harada: data collection, patient management, and interpretation; Kimihiro Yamashita: interpretation, review, and revision of the manuscript; Yoshihiro Kakeji: interpretation, review, and revision of the manuscript; Hironobu Minami: supervision of the project, interpretation, review, and revision of the manuscript. All Authors read and approved the final version of the article.
This article is freely accessible online.
Conflicts of Interest
Hironobu Minami received research grants and honoraria from Bayer Yakuhin, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai Pharmaceutical, DaiichiSankyo, Eisai, Kyowa-Kirin, Merck Serono, MSD, Novartis, Ono Pharmaceutical, Pfizer, Sanofi, Takeda Pharmaceutical, Taiho Pharmaceutical, and Eli Lilly; research grants from Asahi-Kasei Pharma, Astellas Pharma, Nippon Shinyaku, Yakult Honsha, CSL, Behring, and Nippon Kayaku; honoraria from Celgene, Ohtsuka Pharmaceutical, Shire Japan, Genomic Health, and Abbvie. Naomi Kiyota reports grants from Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Ono Pharmaceutical, during the conduct of the study; grants from Astra-Zeneca, and Roche Phamaceuticals, outside the submitted work; honoraria from Ono Pharmaceutical, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck Biopharma, Astra-Zeneca, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Eisai, and Bayer. The other Authors declare no conflict of interest.
- Received December 13, 2020.
- Revision received January 11, 2021.
- Accepted January 20, 2021.
- Copyright © 2021 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.