Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleExperimental Studies

Activity of Free and Liposomal Antimony Trioxide in the Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia Cell Line NB4

ALTEVIR ROSSATO VIANA, CAROLINA BORDIN DAVIDSON, BRUNO SALLES, LUCIANA YAMAMOTO DE ALMEIDA, ALEXANDRE KRAUSE, CEZAR AUGUSTO BIZZI, EDUARDO MAGALHAES REGO, LUCIANA MARIA FONTANARI KRAUSE and SERGIO ROBERTO MORTARI
Anticancer Research December 2021, 41 (12) 6061-6065; DOI: https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.15425
ALTEVIR ROSSATO VIANA
1Área de Ciências da Saúde e Tecnológicas, Universidade Franciscana (UFN), Santa Maria, RS, Brasil;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
CAROLINA BORDIN DAVIDSON
1Área de Ciências da Saúde e Tecnológicas, Universidade Franciscana (UFN), Santa Maria, RS, Brasil;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
BRUNO SALLES
1Área de Ciências da Saúde e Tecnológicas, Universidade Franciscana (UFN), Santa Maria, RS, Brasil;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
LUCIANA YAMAMOTO DE ALMEIDA
2Departamento de Clínica Médica, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo (FMRP-USP), Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brasil;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
ALEXANDRE KRAUSE
3Departamento de Clínica de Pequenos Animais, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM), Santa Maria, RS, Brasil;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
CEZAR AUGUSTO BIZZI
4Departamento de Química, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM), Santa Maria, RS, Brasil;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
EDUARDO MAGALHAES REGO
5Departamento de Clínica Médica, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo (FM-USP), São Paulo, SP, Brasil;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
LUCIANA MARIA FONTANARI KRAUSE
6Departamento de Morfologia, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM), Santa Maria, RS, Brasil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
SERGIO ROBERTO MORTARI
1Área de Ciências da Saúde e Tecnológicas, Universidade Franciscana (UFN), Santa Maria, RS, Brasil;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: mortari{at}ufn.edu.br
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background/Aim: Antimony is a chemical element used in the therapy of parasitic diseases with a promising anticancer potential. The aim of this study was to evaluate in vitro activity of free or liposomal vesicle-packed antimony trioxide (AT or LAT) in the t(15;17)(q22;q21) translocation-positive acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) cell line NB4. Materials and Methods: Cytotoxicity was analysed with trypan blue exclusion, the MTT assay and neutral red exclusion assay; cell proliferation with PicoGreen®; and reactive oxygen species (ROS) production with DCFDA. Results: Liposomal particles did not change the pH of the cell culture medium and entered the cells. Both formulations resulted in a time- and concentration-dependent cytotoxicity and production of ROS. LAT showed higher toxicity at lower concentrations compared to AT. Conclusion: LAT may be used to decrease drug dosage and maintain high anti-tumoral effects on APL cells.

Key Words:
  • Acute promyelocytic leukemia
  • nanotechnology
  • drug repositioning

Cancer is a multifactorial disease, and therefore its treatment needs to address different targets to achieve better results. New therapeutic strategies are investigated and repositioning of drugs is a promising alternative. Antimony is used in the therapy of leishmaniasis and schistosomiasis. The main serious adverse effects are associated to cardiotoxicity in about 9% of the patients and pancreatitis, more commonly seen in co-infections (HIV and visceral leishmaniasis) (1). Reactive oxygen species (ROS) production and oxidative stress damage are the main mechanisms of cell damage caused by antimony (2). Studies have shown that autophagy induced by antimony is triggered by the production of ROS and not by the activation of the mTOR pathway (3). In the present study, we used liposomes, which have low biological impact (4). Nanoparticles can improve drug delivery and efficiency at a lower dosage, reducing toxic effects, which is highly needed in cancer treatment (5). Therefore, we compared the effects of free antimony trioxide (AT) and AT encapsulated in liposomes (LAT) on the acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) cell line NB4.

APL is caused by the fusion protein PML/RARA and was the first leukemia treated with the specific molecular targeting drug all-trans-retinoic acid (ATRA) (6). Despite the high efficiency of the treatment, 5 to 20% of the patients develop the ATRA syndrome, a life-threatening condition associated with organ infiltration by myeloid cells, cytokine production, high expression of CD13 in leukemic cells, and hyperleukocytosis, leading to endothelial inflammation and bleeding in the affected organs (6). Arsenic Trioxide (ATO) is an efficient drug for APL treatment, and in association with ATRA, decreases relapse in about 90% of cases (7), but its use is limited by the risk of toxicity and potential carcinogenicity (8).

The free antimony trioxide (Sb2O3) shows chemical structure and mechanistic properties similar to ATO against APL. They both induce apoptosis in a dose- and time-dependent manner. In addition, both compounds are able to induce degradation of the PML/RARA fusion protein (9). However, the application of antimony has clinical limitations due to the toxic effects associated with the metabolic products deposited in untargeted organs as well as to its hydrophobic characteristic. The use of drugs encapsulated in liposomes is preferred in clinical applications, compared to free drugs, as they show increased vascular permeability (<200 nm in diameter) and increased accumulation in targeted organs (10).

In this study, we used antimony as an alternative anticancer agent for the treatment of APL relapse. We evaluated the efficacy of LAT compared to free AT in APL cells. The choice for the use of liposomes was due to their small size and large surface area that add specific properties, including the ability to catalyse chemical reactions. The increased surface reactivity predicts greater biological activity compared to larger particles when absorbed by living organisms (11). We examined the effects of AT and LAT on the viability of the APL cell line NB4 and ROS production.

Materials and Methods

Production of liposomes containing antimony trioxide. Liposomes containing AT were obtained through the reverse-phase evaporation method (12). The physico-chemical assessments of the obtained formulation indicated a pH=7.28, size=80.05 nm, polydispersity index=0.279, Zeta potential=(–) 6.81, and Sb concentration 0.998±0.002 mg/ml. The encapsulation efficiency was 8.12±0.22% and the formulation remained stable for up to 30 days when stored at 4°C.

Cell culture and treatments. Cells were transferred into cell culture flasks containing RPMI 1640 (Sigma-Aldrich, São Paulo, Brazil), 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Gibco, Grand Island, NY, USA) and 1% penicillin-streptomycin (Sigma-Aldrich). Cell culture medium was changed every two to three days according to the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) recommendations.

NB4 cells were plated into 96-well plates at the concentration of 1×104 cells/well and treated with 25, 50, 100, 200, 300, 400, or 500 μg/ml LAT, empty liposomes (EL) or free antimony trioxide (AT) at the same concentrations as the liposomal antimony. Plates were incubated for 24 and 72 h under the same conditions.

Trypan Blue exclusion test of cell viability. After incubation, the cells were transferred into 1.5 ml polypropylene tubes and centrifuged at 400 × g. Supernatant was discarded and cell pellet was gently suspended in RPMI 1640 medium, and 0.4% Trypan Blue (Sigma-Aldrich) was added to the cells (1:1). After 5 min at room temperature, the cells were transferred to Neubauer chamber and observed under the microscope. One hundred cells (non-stained and blue cells) were counted, and the percentage of non-stained cells represented viable cells.

Reduction of MTT reagent. After the incubation periods, 20 μl of the reagent (5 mg/mL) was added to each well containing cells staying in the CO2 incubator for 3 hours. Finally, the supernatant was removed and the product accumulated inside the cell was extracted by adding DMSO (Synth) (13). Treated cells were exposed to MTT and absorbance was measured at 570 nm in a microplate spectrophotometer (SpectraMax® i3x, Molecular Devices, San Jose, CA, USA).

Neutral red cytotoxicity assay. The supernatant was discarded, the pellet suspended in cell culture medium and 104 cells were plated into each well of a 96-well plate. The cells were treated, and after incubation, the medium was replaced with 200 μl of cell culture medium containing 0.04 μg/ml neutral red. The plates were incubated at 37°C and 5% CO2 for 4 h. The extraction of neutral red incorporated by the lysosomes of viable cells was performed with 200 μl solution of 1% acetic acid, 50% ethanol and 49% water. After extraction, the intensity of the colour was measured by spectrophotometry at 540 nm (14).

PicoGreen® fluorescence cytotoxicity test. PicoGreen® analysis was performed as previously described (15) using the fluorescent dye dsDNAPicoGreen® (Invitrogen, Paisley, UK). After the treatment and incubation of cells, as previously described, the cell culture plate was centrifuged and 10 μl of supernatant of each well were transferred into another 96-well plate. Eighty μl of tris-EDTA 1X buffer (Tris HCl 10 mmol/l, pH=7.5) and 5 μl of the PicoGreen® reagent were then added. The cells were incubated at room temperature for 5 min in the dark and the absorbance was measured by fluorimetry (SpectraMax® i3x – Molecular Devices) at 520 nm emission and 480 nm excitation. The results were expressed as fluorescence values indicating double strand DNA integrity.

Analysis of ROS production with 2’,7’-Dichlorofluorescein diacetate (DCF-DA). After treatment and incubation, the cells were transferred in the dark in 96-well plates and suspended in 50 μl cell culture medium containing 65 μl Tris HCl 10 mmol/l and 10 μl DCFH-DA. The plates were maintained for 30 min in a cell culture incubator (16). After incubation, fluorescence was measured using a spectrofluorometer (SpectraMax® i3x – Molecular Devices).

Statistical analysis. The results of cell viability were expressed as a percentage of negative control±standard deviation. The data were statistically analyzed by one-way (ANOVA) followed by Tukey post hoc using Graphpad prism® software (San Diego, CA, United States), version 5.0 (p-Values <0.05 were considered statistically significant).

Results

Effects of AT and LAT on cell viability - Trypan Blue exclusion cell viability test. After 24 h of incubation, treatment with 200, 300, 400 and 500 μg/ml AT reduced cell viability to 59±4%, 70±1%, 69±5% and 72±2%, respectively (p<0.001). Treatment with 200, 400 and 500 μg/ml LAT for 24 h reduced cell viability to 48±6%, 50±4% and 42±3%, respectively, (p<0.001) (Figure 1A). After 72 h incubation 300, 400 and 500 μg/ml of LAT reduced cell viability to 44±5%, 49±5% and 36±4%, respectively (Figure 1B) (p<0.001).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Cytoxicity and ROS production by free (AT) and liposomal vesiclepacked antimony trioxide (AT and LAT, respectively). (A) and (B) Trypan Blue assay; (C) and (D) MTT assay, (E) and (F) Neutral Red assay, (G) PicoGreen and (H) DCFH-DA assay. Treatments were compared to the negative control (untreated cells) *p<0.05, **p<0.01 and ***p<0.001. LAT was compared to AT #p<0.05, ##p<0.01 and ###p<0.001.

Considering toxicity versus concentration, we observed that AT at 400 and 500 μg/ml was more toxic than ATO in the same concentrations after 24 h. After 72 h, all concentrations, except for 50 μg/ml, showed better activity.

No changes in cell viability were observed following treatment with empty liposomes (EL) at all incubation times. Cell viability according to trypan blue analyses after 24- and 72-h of incubation is shown in Figure 1.

Effects of AT and LAT on cell viability – MTT assay. After 24 h, 25, 50, 100 and 300 μg/ml of LAT decreased cell viability compared to the same concentrations of AT (Figure 1C). After 72 h, both AT and LAT reduced cell viability to 15% at the lowest concentration (25 μg/ml). After 72 h incubation, treatment with 400 and 500 μg/ml EL reduced cell viability to 52±2% and 34±4%, respectively (Figure 1D).

Effects of AT and LAT on cell viability - neutral red assay. Using the method that considers the incorporation of neutral red in the lysosomes of viable cells, a higher viability was observed in cells treated with free AT compared to LAT. After 24 h of incubation, treatment with 500 μg/ml AT reduced cell viability to 56±3%, whereas approximately the same effect (50±6% reduction in cell viability) was obtained following treatment with 10 μg/ml of LAT (Figure 1E). After 72 h, AT toxicity increased (42±5% cell viability at 500 μg/ml) (p<0.001), whereas LAT toxicity at the same concentration was higher (26±3% cell viability) (Figure 1F). At the concentration of 25 μg/ml, AT was more toxic to the cells than LAT, and, at higher concentrations (100, 200, 300 μg/ml), LAT was more toxic after 24 h. LAT was also more toxic after 72 h at all concentrations.

PicoGreen® fluorescence cytotoxicity test. DNA damage following AT and LAT treatment for 72 h was assessed with the PicoGreen® assay. Treatment with 200 μg/ml AT increased extracellular dsDNA 100% in comparison to non-treated cells (p<0.01). LAT treatment was cytotoxic at 200 and 300 μg/ml concentrations (100 and 107%, respectively) (Figure 1G).

Analysis of ROS production with 2’,7’-Dichlorofluorescein diacetate (DCF-DA). In order to analyse ROS production in NB4 cells treated with AT and LAT, we chose the 72h incubation time. AT treatment increased ROS levels at 300, 400 and 500 μg/ml concentrations (p<0.001). LAT treatment induced ROS production at 200, 300, 400 and 500 μg/ml (p<0.001) and this production was the highest at 200 μg/ml (Figure 1H). LAT treatment induced higher ROS production in comparison to AT at 200, 300, and 500 μg/ml concentrations.

Discussion

Liposomal formulations are already used for cancer chemotherapy and, in the field of hematologic malignancies, liposomal vincristine (Marqibo) was approved by the FDA to treat acute lymphoblastic leukemia in 2012 and liposomal doxorubicin in the last years (17). A liposomal formulation of cytarabine and daunorubicin (CPX351), developed by Celator Pharmaceuticals Inc., showed promising results in a clinical phase III trial in patients with AML, with a response of 40% in induction (18). Particle size was defined to a maximum of 200 nm, that penetrate through naturally fenestrated endothelium in the bone marrow (19). The polydispersity index (PDI) <0.500 was defined as satisfactory for this experiment suggesting good homogeneity of the system (4). For these reasons, the size and characteristics of liposomes are important as they determine their transport through the blood stream and uptake into tumour cells (20). AT and LAT showed a dose-dependent cytotoxicity (Figure 1), which was higher after 72 h incubation. LAT showed cytotoxicity at lower concentrations in comparison to AT. This could be explained by a more efficient incorporation of the particle by the cells, in comparison to the free compound. Free compounds might also form insoluble complexes at higher concentrations, which reduces their biological activity.

Antimony complexes have also been shown to be toxic in HL-60 APL cells following treatment for 24 h. Similarly, antimony (III) has been shown to reduce viability of a murine leukemia cell line (L1210) (21). Taken together, our results are promising and offer a new therapeutic possibility to treat cancer with lower drug concentrations.

Liposomes obtained in our study were able to deliver efficiently AT to NB4 cells. A concentration- and time-dependent manner toxicity was observed and detected at lower concentrations in the liposomal formulation in comparison to free AT. LAT treatment induced ROS production in NB4 cells and provides a possible mechanism to efficiently treat APL with AT. In vivo studies are necessary to test the efficiency and safety of LAT, especially in comparison to the current therapy of APL.

Acknowledgements

This study was financed in part by the CAPES, Brazil – Finance Code 001.

Footnotes

  • Authors’ Contributions

    All Authors contributed to the writing of the manuscript. All Authors reviewed and approved the final version of the manuscript.

  • Conflicts of Interest

    The Authors declare no potential conflicts of interest in relation to this study.

  • Received August 25, 2021.
  • Revision received September 15, 2021.
  • Accepted September 21, 2021.
  • Copyright © 2021 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Sundar S and
    2. Chakravarty J
    : Antimony toxicity. Int J Environ Res Public Health 7(12): 4267-4277, 2010. PMID: 21318007. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph7124267
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Cavallo D,
    2. Iavicoli I,
    3. Setini A,
    4. Marinaccio A,
    5. Perniconi B,
    6. Carelli G and
    7. Iavicoli S
    : Genotoxic risk and oxidative DNA damage in workers exposed to antimony trioxide. Environ Mol Mutagen 40(3): 184-189, 2002. PMID: 12355552. DOI: 10.1002/em.10102
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Zhao X,
    2. Xing F,
    3. Cong Y,
    4. Zhuang Y,
    5. Han M,
    6. Wu Z,
    7. Yu S,
    8. Wei H,
    9. Wang X and
    10. Chen G
    : Antimony trichloride induces a loss of cell viability via reactive oxygen species-dependent autophagy in A549 cells. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 93: 32-40, 2017. PMID: 29107181. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocel.2017.10.007
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Sen K and
    2. Mandal M
    : Second generation liposomal cancer therapeutics: transition from laboratory to clinic. Int J Pharm 448(1): 28-43, 2013. PMID: 23500602. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2013.03.006
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Moghimi SM and
    2. Patel HM
    : Opsonophagocytosis of liposomes by peritoneal macrophages and bone marrow reticuloendothelial cells. Biochim Biophys Acta 1135(3): 269-274, 1992. PMID: 1623013. DOI: 10.1016/0167-4889(92)90230-9
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Jácomo RH,
    2. Figueiredo-Pontes LL and
    3. Rego EM
    : [From the molecular model to the impact on prognosis: an overview on acute promyelocytic leukemia]. Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992) 54(1): 82-89, 2008. PMID: 18392492. DOI: 10.1590/s0104-42302008000100026
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Bassi SC and
    2. Rego EM
    : Molecular basis for the diagnosis and treatment of acute promyelocytic leukemia. Rev Bras Hematol Hemoter 34(2): 134-139, 2012. PMID: 23049403. DOI: 10.5581/1516-8484.20120033
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Miller WH Jr.,
    2. Schipper HM,
    3. Lee JS,
    4. Singer J and
    5. Waxman S
    : Mechanisms of action of arsenic trioxide. Cancer Res 62(14): 3893-3903, 2002. PMID: 12124315.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. Tiekink ER
    : Antimony and bismuth compounds in oncology. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 42(3): 217-224, 2002. PMID: 12050016. DOI: 10.1016/s1040-8428(01)00217-7
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Allen TM and
    2. Cullis PR
    : Liposomal drug delivery systems: from concept to clinical applications. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 65(1): 36-48, 2013. PMID: 23036225. DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2012.09.037
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Oberdörster G,
    2. Oberdörster E and
    3. Oberdörster J
    : Nanotoxicology: an emerging discipline evolving from studies of ultrafine particles. Environ Health Perspect 113(7): 823-839, 2005. PMID: 16002369. DOI: 10.1289/ehp.7339
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. da Rosa FC,
    2. Buque Pardinho R,
    3. Schultz Moreira ME,
    4. de Souza LGT,
    5. de Moraes Flores ÉM,
    6. Mortari SR and
    7. Dressler VL
    : In vitro stability of arsenic trioxide-liposome encapsulates for acute promyelocytic leukemia treatment. Leuk Res 76: 11-14, 2019. PMID: 30472478. DOI: 10.1016/j.leukres.2018.11.008
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Mosmann T
    : Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. J Immunol Methods 65(1-2): 55-63, 1983. PMID: 6606682. DOI: 10.1016/0022-1759(83)90303-4
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Repetto G,
    2. del Peso A and
    3. Zurita JL
    : Neutral red uptake assay for the estimation of cell viability/cytotoxicity. Nat Protoc 3(7): 1125-1131, 2008. PMID: 18600217. DOI: 10.1038/nprot.2008.75
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Dragan AI,
    2. Bishop ES,
    3. Casas-Finet JR,
    4. Strouse RJ,
    5. Schenerman MA and
    6. Geddes CD
    : Metal-enhanced PicoGreen fluorescence: application for double-stranded DNA quantification. Anal Biochem 396(1): 8-12, 2010. PMID: 19748479. DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2009.09.010
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Starkov A
    : Measuring Mitochondrial Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) Production. Systems Biology of Free Radicals and Antioxidants: 265-278, 2019. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-30018-9_8
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  17. ↵
    1. Rodriguez MA,
    2. Pytlik R,
    3. Kozak T,
    4. Chhanabhai M,
    5. Gascoyne R,
    6. Lu B,
    7. Deitcher SR,
    8. Winter JN and Marqibo Investigators
    : Vincristine sulfate liposomes injection (Marqibo) in heavily pretreated patients with refractory aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma: report of the pivotal phase 2 study. Cancer 115(15): 3475-3482, 2009. PMID: 19536896. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.24359
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Zhao N,
    2. Woodle MC and
    3. Mixson AJ
    : Advances in delivery systems for doxorubicin. J Nanomed Nanotechnol 9(5): 519, 2018. PMID: 30613436. DOI: 10.4172/2157-7439.1000519
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Cortes JE,
    2. Goldberg SL,
    3. Feldman EJ,
    4. Rizzeri DA,
    5. Hogge DE,
    6. Larson M,
    7. Pigneux A,
    8. Recher C,
    9. Schiller G,
    10. Warzocha K,
    11. Kantarjian H,
    12. Louie AC and
    13. Kolitz JE
    : Phase II, multicenter, randomized trial of CPX-351 (cytarabine:daunorubicin) liposome injection versus intensive salvage therapy in adults with first relapse AML. Cancer 121(2): 234-242, 2015. PMID: 25223583. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.28974
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Correia OL,
    2. Fleury TEJ,
    3. Gomes SL,
    4. Neves MR,
    5. Martins LE and
    6. Fleury TS
    : Aplicações das nanopartículas lipídicas no tratamento de tumores sólidos: Revisão de literatura. Rev Bras Cancerol 58: 695-701, 2012. DOI: 10.32635/2176-9745.rbc.2012v58n4.581
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  21. ↵
    1. Wu J,
    2. You YQ,
    3. Ma YX,
    4. Kang YH,
    5. Wu T,
    6. Wu XJ,
    7. Hu XX,
    8. Meng QH,
    9. Huang Y,
    10. Zhang N and
    11. Pan XB
    : DDX5-targeting fully human monoclonal autoantibody inhibits proliferation and promotes differentiation of acute promyelocytic leukemia cells by increasing ROS production. Cell Death Dis 11(7): 552, 2020. PMID: 32690860. DOI: 10.1038/s41419-020-02759-5
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research
Vol. 41, Issue 12
December 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Activity of Free and Liposomal Antimony Trioxide in the Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia Cell Line NB4
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
4 + 13 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Activity of Free and Liposomal Antimony Trioxide in the Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia Cell Line NB4
ALTEVIR ROSSATO VIANA, CAROLINA BORDIN DAVIDSON, BRUNO SALLES, LUCIANA YAMAMOTO DE ALMEIDA, ALEXANDRE KRAUSE, CEZAR AUGUSTO BIZZI, EDUARDO MAGALHAES REGO, LUCIANA MARIA FONTANARI KRAUSE, SERGIO ROBERTO MORTARI
Anticancer Research Dec 2021, 41 (12) 6061-6065; DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.15425

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Activity of Free and Liposomal Antimony Trioxide in the Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia Cell Line NB4
ALTEVIR ROSSATO VIANA, CAROLINA BORDIN DAVIDSON, BRUNO SALLES, LUCIANA YAMAMOTO DE ALMEIDA, ALEXANDRE KRAUSE, CEZAR AUGUSTO BIZZI, EDUARDO MAGALHAES REGO, LUCIANA MARIA FONTANARI KRAUSE, SERGIO ROBERTO MORTARI
Anticancer Research Dec 2021, 41 (12) 6061-6065; DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.15425
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Growth Suppression and Selective Disruption of F-Actin by α-Santalol in Human Melanoma Cells
  • RPA1, RFC1, and POLE Expression in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: Immune and Clinical Relevance
  • Inhibition of Cholesterol Transport from Lysosomes by Itraconazole Repolarizes Tumor-associated Macrophages to Anti-tumor M1 type
Show more Experimental Studies

Keywords

  • acute promyelocytic leukemia
  • nanotechnology
  • drug repositioning
Anticancer Research

© 2025 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire