Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleClinical Studies

Similar Recurrence Rate Between Gleason Score of Six at Positive Margin and Negative Margin After Radical Prostatectomy

HIROSHI KANO, YOSHIFUMI KADONO, SUGURU KADOMOTO, HIROAKI IWAMOTO, HIROSHI YAEGASHI, MASASHI IIJIMA, SHOHEI KAWAGUCHI, TAKAHIRO NOHARA, KAZUYOSHI SHIGEHARA, KOUJI IZUMI, HIROKO IKEDA and ATSUSHI MIZOKAMI
Anticancer Research January 2021, 41 (1) 509-516; DOI: https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.14802
HIROSHI KANO
1Department of Integrative Cancer Therapy and Urology, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
YOSHIFUMI KADONO
1Department of Integrative Cancer Therapy and Urology, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: yskadono@yahoo.co.jp
SUGURU KADOMOTO
1Department of Integrative Cancer Therapy and Urology, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
HIROAKI IWAMOTO
1Department of Integrative Cancer Therapy and Urology, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
HIROSHI YAEGASHI
1Department of Integrative Cancer Therapy and Urology, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MASASHI IIJIMA
1Department of Integrative Cancer Therapy and Urology, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
SHOHEI KAWAGUCHI
1Department of Integrative Cancer Therapy and Urology, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
TAKAHIRO NOHARA
1Department of Integrative Cancer Therapy and Urology, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
KAZUYOSHI SHIGEHARA
1Department of Integrative Cancer Therapy and Urology, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
KOUJI IZUMI
1Department of Integrative Cancer Therapy and Urology, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
HIROKO IKEDA
2Diagnostic Pathology, Kanazawa University Hospital, Kanazawa, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
ATSUSHI MIZOKAMI
1Department of Integrative Cancer Therapy and Urology, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background/Aim: To investigate whether surgical margin (SM) status would affect the biochemical recurrence (BCR) after robot-associated RP (RARP). Patients and Methods: We evaluated BCR after RARP and the association between pre- and postoperative predictive factors and BCR. Results: Positive SM (PSM) was observed in 97 out of 365 enrolled patients. On multivariate analysis, preoperative prostate specific antigen, biopsy Gleason score (GS), clinical stage, GS ≥7 at the PSM and pathological GS ≥7 were predictive factors for BCR. The 5-year BCR-free survival rate was 84.1% in the negative SM (NSM), 87.4% when GS=6 at the PSM, and 47.6% when GS ≥7 at the PSM. There was no statistically significant difference in BCR-free survival between the NSM group and GS=6 at the PSM group (p=0.966). Conclusion: It would be desirable to evaluate GS at PSM when PSM is present in a specimen removed by RP.

Key Words:
  • Biochemical recurrence
  • Gleason score
  • positive surgical margin
  • radical prostatectomy
  • Received November 19, 2020.
  • Revision received December 18, 2020.
  • Accepted December 21, 2020.
  • Copyright© 2021, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.
View Full Text

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?

Purchase access

You may purchase access to this article. This will require you to create an account if you don't already have one.

patientACCESS

patientACCESS - Patients desiring access to articles
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research: 41 (1)
Anticancer Research
Vol. 41, Issue 1
January 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Similar Recurrence Rate Between Gleason Score of Six at Positive Margin and Negative Margin After Radical Prostatectomy
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
19 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Similar Recurrence Rate Between Gleason Score of Six at Positive Margin and Negative Margin After Radical Prostatectomy
HIROSHI KANO, YOSHIFUMI KADONO, SUGURU KADOMOTO, HIROAKI IWAMOTO, HIROSHI YAEGASHI, MASASHI IIJIMA, SHOHEI KAWAGUCHI, TAKAHIRO NOHARA, KAZUYOSHI SHIGEHARA, KOUJI IZUMI, HIROKO IKEDA, ATSUSHI MIZOKAMI
Anticancer Research Jan 2021, 41 (1) 509-516; DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.14802

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Similar Recurrence Rate Between Gleason Score of Six at Positive Margin and Negative Margin After Radical Prostatectomy
HIROSHI KANO, YOSHIFUMI KADONO, SUGURU KADOMOTO, HIROAKI IWAMOTO, HIROSHI YAEGASHI, MASASHI IIJIMA, SHOHEI KAWAGUCHI, TAKAHIRO NOHARA, KAZUYOSHI SHIGEHARA, KOUJI IZUMI, HIROKO IKEDA, ATSUSHI MIZOKAMI
Anticancer Research Jan 2021, 41 (1) 509-516; DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.14802
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Patients and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • A Novel Filtration Membrane for Clustered Circulating Tumor Cell Extraction: A Prospective Feasibility Study
  • Atezolizumab for EGFR-mutated Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients: An Observation Study in Ibaraki Group (ATTENTION-IBARAKI)
  • Early Phase Persistent Changes in the White Blood Cell Fraction in Patients With Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma Treated With Pembrolizumab: A Multicenter Retrospective Study
Show more Clinical Studies

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • biochemical recurrence
  • Gleason score
  • positive surgical margin
  • radical prostatectomy
Anticancer Research

© 2023 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire