Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues 2025
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues 2025
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleExperimental Studies

Vimentin 3 Expression in Prostate Cancer Cells

BARBARA KÖDITZ, ANDREAS STOG, HEIKE GÖBEL, ISABELL HEIDEGGER, JOCHEN FRIES, AXEL HEIDENREICH and MELANIE VON BRANDENSTEIN
Anticancer Research January 2021, 41 (1) 169-174; DOI: https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.14762
BARBARA KÖDITZ
1University Hospital of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department of Urology, Cologne, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: barbara.koeditz@uk-koeln.de
ANDREAS STOG
1University Hospital of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department of Urology, Cologne, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
HEIKE GÖBEL
2Department of Pathology University Hospital of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
ISABELL HEIDEGGER
3University Hospital of Innsbruck, Department of Urology, Innsbruck, Austria
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
JOCHEN FRIES
1University Hospital of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department of Urology, Cologne, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
AXEL HEIDENREICH
1University Hospital of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department of Urology, Cologne, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MELANIE VON BRANDENSTEIN
1University Hospital of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department of Urology, Cologne, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background/Aim: Vimentin3 (Vim3) was recently described as a tumour marker for the direct discrimination between benign and malignant kidney tumours. Here, we examined its expression in prostate cancer (PCa) cell lines and the regulation of its expression by endothelin receptors. Materials and Methods: Prostate cancer cell lines (PC3, DU145, LNCap) were incubated with endothelin 1 (ET-1), BQ123 [endothelin A receptor (ETAR) antagonist], BQ788 [endothelin B receptor (ETBR) antagonist], BQ123+ET-1, BQ788+ET-1 for 24 h and a scratch assay was performed. Cell extracts were analysed by western blotting and qRT-PCR. Results: ET-1 induced Vim3 overexpression. Blocking the ETBR in the different prostate cancer cell lines yielded a higher migration rate, whereby Vim3 expression was significantly increased. Conclusion: Vim3 concentration increases in cell lines without a functional ETBR and may be used as a marker for PCas where ETBR is frequently methylated.

Key Words:
  • Prostate cancer
  • Vimentin 3
  • Endothelin-1

Endothelin-1 (ET-1) was first described in 1988 as a vasoconstrictor peptide (1), and is currently also known as a multifunctional protein in cancer. The ET-1 axis, including the endothelin A receptor (ETAR) and the endothelin B receptor (ETBR), has been found to be frequently involved in the development of several different solid tumours, e.g. breast, ovarian, and prostate (2). The binding of ET-1 to the ETAR induces a survival pathway. It can result in cell proliferation, escape from apoptosis, angiogenesis, invasion and metastasis formation (3, 4). The binding to the ETBR results in the clearance of ET-1 and apoptosis 3. In 1996, Nelson et al. reported that the ETBR is frequently down-regulated in some prostate cancers (PCa) and that this down-regulation is a sign of a more aggressive behaviour of the tumour (5). The down-regulation of ETBR is due to promoter methylation (3). Elevated ET-1 levels in prostate cancer patients have been associated with higher metastatic potential (6). Furthermore, the levels of ET-1 in cancer cells correlate with tumour progression (3).

A clear correlation between the overexpression of ET-1 and the production of a truncated Vimentin version, called Vim3, was recently described (7). Due to this truncation of Vimentin, cells lose their normal cell structure, as full-length Vimentin (VimFL) is important for the arrangement of cell organelles and the anchorage of cells (8). Truncated Vimentin (Vim3) lacks the C-terminal end and therefore, the normal Vimentin function is lost. Furthermore, it is known that prostate cancer patients with increased Vimentin levels have a higher potential for developing metastases (9). Nevertheless, due to the use of several different commercially available antibodies, either directed against the full-length version or both versions of Vimentin, many of the results from formerly performed experiments are questionable (10). It has previously been shown that overexpression of Vim3 correlates with increased metastatic potential of breast cancer cells (11). Since the different PCa cell line have a different metastatic potential, we examined the expression of Vim3 in these cell lines and the expression of Vim3 and their behavior of after blockage of the ETBR.

Materials and Methods

Cell culture and treatment. DU145 cells were cultured in DMEM (Life Technology GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (FCS) (PAN Biotech GmbH, Aidenbach, Germany) and 1% Penicillin/Streptomycin (Invitrogen, Karlsruhe, Germany) at 37°C and 5% CO2. PC3 and LN-Cap cells were cultured in RPMI (Life Technology GmbH) supplemented as mentioned above. After serum starvation for 24 h, cells were treated with Endothelin-1 (50 nM, Sigma, Deisenhofen, Germany), BQ123 (ETAR antagonist, 100 nM, Sigma), BQ788 (ETBR antagonist, 100 μM, Sigma) for 3, 6 and 24 h depending on the experimental setting.

Western blot. Total protein extraction and Western Blots were performed as already published (11). All blots were analysed with the INTAS Chemostar (Intas Science Imaging, Göttingen, Germany).

Scratch-assay. PCa cell lines were grown in 100 mm tissue culture dishes until they reached a confluency of 80%. Cells were serum-starved for 24 h and a scratch was performed with a white pipette tip. After serum starvation, cells were treated for 24 h with either ET-1, ETAR block, ETBR block or different combinations. Pictures were obtained after 3, 6, and 24 h. For DU145 and LNCap cells, pictures were acquired after 24 h.

Reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The cDNA was obtained from 250 ng RNA using random primers and SuperScript III according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Invitrogen, Darmstadt, Germany). The RT-PCR was performed as previously described (10, 11).

Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR). One μl of the cDNA (transcribed from 250 ng RNA) was used for real-time PCR analysis. The experimental settings were as previously described (10, 11). All samples were normalised to β-actin. Relative fluorescence was calculated using the ΔΔCT method as outlined in User Bulletin 2 (PE Applied Biosystems, Forster City, CA, USA). Untreated cells were used as controls. The statistical significance of qRT-PCR values after different treatments was assessed by multiple analyses of variance (ANOVA).

Statistics. All experiments were performed in triplicates. The statistical analysis was performed with the GraphPrism 5 (Graphpad software, La Jolla, CA, USA). A paired T-test with one-way ANOVA was performed. The alpha–value was 0.05 and the results are visualized as boxplots (***p<0.0001, **p<0.001, *p<0.01).

Results

As recently described, ET-1 plays a role in the expression of Vim3 (12). Therefore, the PCa cell lines (PC3, DU145 and LNCap) were stimulated with ET-1, BQ123 (ETAR antagonist), BQ788 (ETBR antagonist) or in combination. A Scratch Assay was performed. The highest migration rate was found in PC3 cells after 6 h treatment with ET-1 and BQ788 (Figure 1A, upper part). In LNCap (Figure 1B) and DU145 (Figure 1C) highest migration was found after 24 h treatment with ET-1 and BQ788. Boxplot analysis was performed. Cells migrating into the specific area of the gap were counted.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Migration of PCa cells under treatment. (A) Scratch Assay in PC3 after ET-1 stimulation and receptor blockage for 3 and 6 h. Increased migration after ETBR block (BQ788) and ET-1 treatment for 6 h. (B) Scratch Assay of LNCap cells after 24 h. Here the same results can be seen. (C) Scratch Assay of DU145 cells after 24 h.

The expression of Vim3 and VimFL was determined via qRT-PCR after different stimulations (Figure 2). Figure 2 shows that Vim3 mRNA expression was significantly increased after ET-1 and BQ788 treatment. VimFL mRNA expression did not show any significant differences.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

qRT-PCR for Vim3 and VimFL levels in PC3 after ET-1 and receptor block treatment for 24 h. Significant increase was observed after BQ788 (ETBR block) and ET-1 treatment.

In Western Blot a significant increase in Vim3 levels after ET-1 treatment as well as ET-1 and BQ788 (Figure 3) was detectable. Similar results were obtained for all three prostate cancer cell lines. Interestingly, Vimentin full-length shows a reversal of results after ET-1 and ETBR treatment (Figure 3).

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

Vim3 and VimFL expression in prostate cancer cell lines. (A) Western Blot for Vim3, Vim FL, and β-actin in all PCas. (A) in PC3 cells, (B) in LNCap and (C) in DU145.

Discussion

The presented results indicate that the migration rate of PCa cells (DU145, LNCap and PC3) is influenced by the presence of ET-1 and the blockage of the two ET-1 receptors (Figure 1). The highest migration rate was found in case of PC3 cells treated for 6 h with ET-1 and ETBR. This result agrees with the literature, since this cell line is described as more aggressive (13). Furthermore, even the LNCap cell line, which is hormone sensitive, seems to be influenced by blocking the ETBR/ET-1 pathway. According to these results it seems that this pathway operates in both castration-naïve and castration resistant prostate cancer. Since we hypothesized that Vim3 is a malignancy marker, we analysed the mRNA as well as the protein levels in the different cell lines. In comparison to the VimFL, significant differences were detected, indicating that Vim3 could be a malignancy marker (Figures 2 and 3). This can be explained by the fact that Vimentin is associated with increased malignancy and is highly expressed in poorly differentiated prostate cancers (14). The differentiation is quite difficult since different antibodies are available which detect either only VimFL or both VimFL and Vim3 (10). Nevertheless, the newly designed Vim3 monoclonal antibody only detects the truncated version as described (10). Based on our results, it can be hypothesized that Vim3 plays a major role in malignancy. VimFL levels did not change significantly at the mRNA and protein level. Therefore, only Vim3 seems to be associated with increased migration and proliferation of prostate cancer cells, especially after an inhibition of ETBR. These results are in agreement with those in the literature, since in most prostate cancer patients with aggressive tumours ETBR is down-regulated (3, 15), concluding that the ET-1 signalling pathway is predominantly exerted via ETAR. Interestingly, all three cell lines showed the same overexpression of the newly identified malignancy marker Vim3 (Figure 3) protein after treatment with ET-1 and ETBR.

We concluded that Vim3 may be responsible for the increased metastatic behaviour of cancer cells. Vim3 expression can be detected in cells after ETBR block which is frequently the case in patients with high grade PCa. In these patients, ETBR is methylated and as a result ET-1 signalling is mediated by ETAR.

Conclusion

Vim3 levels and proliferation are significantly increased in prostate cancer cell lines after ETBR block, indicating that Vim3 can be a possible marker for the detection of aggressive PCas.

Footnotes

  • ↵* These Authors contributed equally to this study.

  • Authors’ Contributions

    BK, AS: experimental part, cell culture; MvB: wrote the manuscript with the support of AH, JF, IH, BK, HG, AS; MvB and AH: designed the study and directed the project; all other Authors performed the analysis, designed the figures and discussed the results.

  • Conflicts of Interest

    The Authors declare no conflicts of interest in relation to this study.

  • Received October 28, 2020.
  • Revision received November 19, 2020.
  • Accepted November 20, 2020.
  • Copyright© 2021, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Yanagisawa M,
    2. Kurihara H,
    3. Kimura S,
    4. Goto K and
    5. Masaki T
    : A novel peptide vasoconstrictor, endothelin, is produced by vascular endothelium and modulates smooth muscle Ca2+ channels. J Hypertens Suppl 6(4): S188-191, 1988. PMID: 2853725. DOI: 10.1097/00004872-198812040-00056
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Rosano L,
    2. Spinella F and
    3. Bagnato A
    : Endothelin 1 in cancer: biological implications and therapeutic opportunities. Nat Rev Cancer 13: 637-651, 2013. PMID: 23884378. DOI: 10.1038/nrc3546
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Nelson J B,
    2. Udan M S,
    3. Guruli G and
    4. Pflug BR
    : Endothelin-1 inhibits apoptosis in prostate cancer. Neoplasia 7: 631-637, 2005. PMID: 16026642. DOI: 10.1593/neo.04787
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Bagnato A and
    2. Rosano L
    : The endothelin axis in cancer. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 40: 1443-1451, 2008. PMID: 18325824. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocel.2008.01.022
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Nelson JB,
    2. Chan-Tack K,
    3. Hedican SP,
    4. Magnuson SR,
    5. Opgenorth TJ,
    6. Bova GS and
    7. Simons JW
    : Endothelin-1 production and decreased endothelin B receptor expression in advanced prostate cancer. Cancer Res 56: 663-668, 1996. PMID: 8630991.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    1. Guise TA,
    2. Yin JJ and
    3. Mohammad KS
    : Role of endothelin-1 in osteoblastic bone metastases. Cancer 97: 779-784, 2003. PMID: 12548575. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.11129
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. von Brandenstein MSJ,
    2. Geisbüsch CM,
    3. Ozretić L,
    4. Ural Y,
    5. Kirn V,
    6. Malter W and
    7. Fries JWU
    : Tamoxifen treatment in correlation with increased ET-1 levels is associated with the development of breast cancer metastases. J Cancer Ther 9: 438-463, 2018. DOI: 10.4236/jct.2018.95038
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  8. ↵
    1. Lowery J,
    2. Kuczmarski ER,
    3. Herrmann H and
    4. Goldman RD
    : Intermediate filaments play a pivotal role in regulating cell architecture and function. J Biol Chem 290: 17145-17153, 2015. PMID: 25957409. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.R115.640359
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. Wei J,
    2. Xu G,
    3. Wu M,
    4. Zhang Y,
    5. Li Q,
    6. Liu P,
    7. Zhu T,
    8. Song A,
    9. Zhao L,
    10. Han Z,
    11. Chen G,
    12. Wang S,
    13. Meng L,
    14. Zhou J,
    15. Lu Y,
    16. Wang S and
    17. Ma D
    : Overexpression of vimentin contributes to prostate cancer invasion and metastasis via src regulation. Anticancer Res 28: 327-334, 2008. PMID: 18383865.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. von Brandenstein M,
    2. Puetz K,
    3. Schlosser M,
    4. Loser H,
    5. Kallinowski J P,
    6. Godde D,
    7. Buettner R,
    8. Storkel S and
    9. Fries JW
    : Vimentin 3, the new hope, differentiating RCC versus oncocytoma. Dis Markers 2015: 368534, 2015. PMID: 25944973. DOI: 10.1155/2015/368534
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. von Brandenstein MG,
    2. Ngum Abety A,
    3. Depping R,
    4. Roth T,
    5. Koehler M,
    6. Dienes HP and
    7. Fries JW
    : A p38-p65 transcription complex induced by endothelin-1 mediates signal transduction in cancer cells. Biochim Biophys Acta 1783: 1613-1622, 2008. PMID: 18457675. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2008.04.003
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. von Brandenstein M,
    2. Bernhart SH,
    3. Pansky A,
    4. Richter C,
    5. Kohl T,
    6. Deckert M,
    7. Heidenreich A,
    8. Stadler PF,
    9. Montesinos-Rongen M and
    10. Fries JWU
    : Beyond the 3’UTR binding-microRNA-induced protein truncation via DNA binding. Oncotarget 9: 32855-32867, 2018. PMID: 30214689. DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.26023
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Ravenna L,
    2. Principessa L,
    3. Verdina A,
    4. Salvatori L,
    5. Russo MA and
    6. Petrangeli E
    : Distinct phenotypes of human prostate cancer cells associate with different adaptation to hypoxia and pro-inflammatory gene expression. PLoS One 9: e96250, 2014. PMID: 24801981. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0096250
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Satelli A and
    2. Li S
    : Vimentin in cancer and its potential as a molecular target for cancer therapy. Cell Mol Life Sci 68: 3033-3046, 2011. PMID: 21637948. DOI: 10.1007/s00018-011-0735-1
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Roh M and
    2. Abdulkadir SA
    : Targeting the endothelin receptor in prostate cancer bone metastasis: Back to the mouse? Cancer Biol Ther 9: 615-617, 2010. PMID: 20150768. DOI: 10.4161/cbt.9.8.11309
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research: 41 (1)
Anticancer Research
Vol. 41, Issue 1
January 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Vimentin 3 Expression in Prostate Cancer Cells
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 5 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Vimentin 3 Expression in Prostate Cancer Cells
BARBARA KÖDITZ, ANDREAS STOG, HEIKE GÖBEL, ISABELL HEIDEGGER, JOCHEN FRIES, AXEL HEIDENREICH, MELANIE VON BRANDENSTEIN
Anticancer Research Jan 2021, 41 (1) 169-174; DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.14762

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Vimentin 3 Expression in Prostate Cancer Cells
BARBARA KÖDITZ, ANDREAS STOG, HEIKE GÖBEL, ISABELL HEIDEGGER, JOCHEN FRIES, AXEL HEIDENREICH, MELANIE VON BRANDENSTEIN
Anticancer Research Jan 2021, 41 (1) 169-174; DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.14762
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Improved Analysis of Prostate Cancer: VIM3, ATG7 and P53 Form a Complex and Activate miRNA 371a-3p
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Tumor Immunology Visualized in Realtime in In-vivo-like 3-D Gelfoam® Histoculture by Color-coded Imaging
  • The Role of EMP2 in Triple-negative Breast Cancer
  • Role of the Circadian Clock Gene DEC1 in Chemosensitivity and Apoptosis in Colorectal Cancer
Show more Experimental Studies

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Prostate cancer
  • Vimentin 3
  • Endothelin-1
Anticancer Research

© 2025 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire