Abstract
Background/Aim: In this study, the liver sinusoidal endothelial cells (LSECs)-protective effects of beraprost sodium (BPS) were investigated using mice with monocrotaline (MCT)-induced sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS). Materials and Methods: The mice were divided into BPS, placebo and control groups. They were killed 48 h after MCT administration, and blood samples and liver tissues were evaluated. Immunostaining was performed using anti-SE-1 and anti-CD42b antibodies, whereas plasminogen activator inhibitor (PAI-1) and endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) levels were evaluated using western blot or real-time RT-PCR. Results: On pathological examination, SOS-related findings were observed in zone 3 in the placebo group; however, these were significantly suppressed in the BPS group. SE-1 staining showed a consistent number of LSECs in the BPS group compared with that in the placebo group, while CD42b staining showed a significant decrease in the number of extravasated platelet aggregation (EPA) in the BPS group. PAI-1 expression was significantly lower in the BPS group than in the placebo group; however, eNOS expression was significantly higher in the BPS group than in the placebo group. Conclusion: Prophylactic administration of BPS is useful for suppressing the development of SOS through the protective effects of LSEC.
- Beraprost sodium
- liver sinusoidal endothelial cells
- liver transplantation
- oxaliplatin based chemotherapy
- sinusoidal obstruction syndrome
- veno-occlusive disease
Sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS), formally known as veno-occlusive disease (VOD) (1), is defined as a syndrome that involves symptoms such as abdominal pain, hepatomegaly, ascites, weight gain, portal hypertension, and jaundice (2). Once the onset of SOS/VOD has occurred, it is life-threatening, with a mortality rate of at least 80% (3, 4). Reported causes of SOS/VOD include colorectal cancer chemotherapy containing L-OHP, acute leukemia chemotherapy, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and liver transplantation (5-8).
In a clinical study, it was reported that defibrotide was effective for treating SOS/VOD; however, its use has not been approved in Japan (9). Other studies suggest that antithrombin III, prostaglandin E1, low-molecular-weight heparin, and ursodeoxycholic acid are useful alternatives (10-13). Although various treatment options have been reported, no specific treatment has been established as effective for treating SOS/VOD to date (2).
We had previously classified three phases, from liver sinusoidal endothelial cell (LSEC) damage to organ dysfunction, utilizing the predicted pathogenic mechanism of SOS (14). The first phase was detachment of the LSECs, and sinusoidal wall destruction after LSEC injury by immunosuppressant and chemotherapeutic agents. The second phase was extravasated platelet aggregation (EPA) accomplished by sinusoidal wall destruction. The various growth factors, including thromboxane A2 (TXA2), serotonin, transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β) and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1), were released via EPA in the space of Disse in zone 3; portal hypertension and the progression of hepatic fibrosis were induced. The third phase was organ dysfunction following portal hypertension, hepatic fibrosis, and suppressed liver regeneration through the various growth factors secreted via EPA (14-17). It is therefore considered that protection of the LSECs is an important measure against SOS/VOD (14, 18).
Beraprost sodium (BPS) is a prostaglandin I2 (PGI2) derivative used to treat both chronic arterial occlusive disease and primary pulmonary hypertension. In addition to its antiplatelet and vasodilatory effects, it has been reported to have protective effects on vascular endothelial cells (19, 20). The aim of this study was thus to investigate the prophylactic effects of BPS on SOS/VOD and its LSEC-protective effects using a murine model with monocrotaline (MCT)-induced SOS.
Materials and Methods
Animals. Five-week-old female Crl:CD1(ICR) mice weighing between 20 and 30 g were purchased from Charles River Laboratories Japan, Inc. (Yokohama, Japan) (18). All experiments included in this study were submitted to the Kanazawa University Animal Experiments Committee in accordance with the Animal Experiments Protocol, and approval was obtained (approval no.: AP-153599).
Experimental protocol. MCT was purchased in powder form from FUJIFILM Wako Pure Chemical Corporation (Tokyo, Japan). Free samples of BPS in powder form were provided by Toray Industries, Inc. (Chiba, Japan) for research purposes.
After two weeks of rearing with standard food, the mice were recruited into the study at the age of seven weeks. They had ad libitum access to drinking water and were fasted for twelve hours before drug administration.
There were three group allocations (n=10 in each group); with reference to a previous report (18), 270 mg/kg MCT was administered intraperitoneally to prepare the SOS model. The BPS group was administered 200 μg/kg BPS intraperitoneally one hour before and both three and nine hours after MCT administration. Following the same regimen as the BPS group, the placebo group was administered physiological saline solution instead of BPS; the control group was administered physiological saline solution in place of both MCT and BPS. The mice were killed 48 h after MCT administration, and blood and liver samples were collected. The liver was visually inspected, and the presence or absence of ascites were determined.
Pathological assessment. Liver tissue was fixed with 10% neutral buffered formalin, embedded in paraffin, and sectioned at a thickness of 4 μm. Hematoxylin and eosin stains were prepared and examined microscopically. In connection with SOS scoring, sinusoidal dilation, sinusoidal congestion, endothelial damage of the central vein, and necrosis were evaluated (17, 21). For each of these parameters, a score between 0 and 3 was given (0: normal; 1: mild; 2: moderate; and 3: severe). The sum of the parameter scores was determined as SOS scores, and evaluations were performed on the basis of the mean for each group.
Immunohistochemical staining. LSEC damage was evaluated by immunostaining with the following antibodies: (i) SE-1, against hepatic sinusoidal endothelial cells (NB110-68095; Novus Biologicals, Cambridge, UK); (ii), against glycoprotein Ib-α (orb6179, cluster of differentiation 42b; Biorbyt, Ltd., Cambridge, UK); and (iii) against caspase-3 (#9664, Cell Signaling Technology, Inc., Tokyo, Japan).
The space of Disse originally contains reticular fibers, which consist primarily of Type III collagen. When EPA occurs, Type III collagen and platelet aggregates are formed in the space of Disse; one effect of this is increased Type I collagen production by hepatic stellate cells. These activities lead to further occlusion in the space of Disse. Collagen fibers in zone 3 were evaluated using Azan staining (Muto pure chemicals, Tokyo, Japan), which stains collagen fibers deep blue, and silver-plating stain, which stains reticular fibers composed of Type III collagen.
Each staining was measured for the area stained (%) as the average of five randomly selected images in the center of zone 3 using Image J (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA).
Western blot analysis. Plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) is a marker for vascular endothelial cell damage, while endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) is a marker for LSEC-protective effects. These were evaluated via western blot analysis using anti-PAI-1 (D9C4) rabbit monoclonal antibody (#11907; Cell Signaling Technology, Inc., Tokyo, Japan), and anti-eNOS antibody (#9572; Cell Signaling Technology, Inc., Tokyo, Japan), diluted 1,000x.
Real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (real-time RT-PCR). Liver samples were collected from the mice, and total RNA was purified using the RNeasy Plus Mini Kit (Qiagen Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). Real-time RT-PCR was carried out using Multiplex Quantitative PCR Systems (Mx3000P; Agilent Technologies, Inc. Santa Clara, CA, USA). In addition to PAI-1 and eNOS, expressions of Akt-1 in the PI3K/Akt pathway and phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase (PI3K) at an upstream position were numerically expressed and evaluated.
Hematological findings. White blood cells (WBCs), platelet count, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), total bilirubin (T-Bil), and hyaluronic acid were evaluated.
Statistical analysis. Results were expressed as mean±standard deviation (SD). The intergroup differences between measured variables were evaluated using one-way analysis of variance followed by Bonferroni multiple-comparison method with the IBM SPSS 24.0 software (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY, USA). A p-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
Pathological signs
Visual findings. The volume of ascites was high in the placebo group, and the liver had a deep red coloration. The findings in the BPS group were the same as those in the control group, with neither ascites nor discoloration (Figure 1A). Physiological saline solution infusion via the portal vein resulted in resistance in the placebo group, with a mild color change. In the BPS and control groups, there was little resistance, and the liver changed to white (Figure 1B).
Histopathological findings
Hematoxylin and eosin staining. In the placebo group, hematoxylin and eosin staining of the liver tissue revealed sinusoidal dilation and congestion around zone 3 in the central vein; these signs were mild in the BPS and control groups (Figure 1C).
SOS score. In the BPS group, the SOS score was significantly lower than in the placebo group (placebo: 9.10±1.37; BPS: 2.00±2.11; n=10 in each group; p<0.0001) (Table I).
Immunohistochemical staining
Evaluation of sinusoidal endothelial cells. Immunohistochemical analysis of the LSECs using an anti-SE-1 antibody confirmed that marked staining was found along the sinusoids in zone 3 surrounding the central vein in both the control and BPS groups; less staining was observed in the placebo group (control: 5.81±0.80; placebo: 0.80±0.31; BPS: 10.98±1.05; control vs. placebo: p=0.00014; placebo vs. BPS: p<0.0001; Figure 1D and 1G).
The presence of platelets was examined using CD42b staining. In the placebo group, extravasated platelets were present in the space of Disse in zone 3. Few extravasated platelets were found in the BPS group, and none were found in the control group (control: 0.074±0.035; placebo: 4.33±0.73; BPS: 0.20±0.044; control vs. placebo: p=0.00062; placebo vs. BPS: p=0.00069; Figure 1E and 1H).
The apoptotic cells were examined using caspase-3 staining. Caspase-3 was expressed in the placebo group, centered in zone 3. Expression of caspase-3 was lower in the BPS group, and no expression was observed in the control group (control: 0.0040±0.0034; placebo: 1.64±0.60; BPS: 0.26±0.061; control vs. placebo: p=0.011; placebo vs. BPS: p=0.021; Figure 1F and 1I).
Evaluation of connective tissue fibers. Azan staining of the hepatic fibrosis revealed that the staining centered around zone 3 in the placebo group was more intense than in the BPS group (control: 3.51±1.09; placebo: 12.89±3.35; BPS: 2.70±1.21; control vs. placebo: p=0.0057; placebo vs. BPS: p=0.0041; Figure 2A and 2C).
On the other hand, the silver-plating stain centered around zone 3 in the placebo group was less intense than in the BPS group (control: 4.58±0.12; placebo: 1.21±0.29; BPS: 3.82±0.75; control vs. placebo: p<0.0001; placebo vs. BPS: p=0.0024; Figure 2B and 2D).
Evaluation of vascular endothelial cell damage
Western blotting method. Expression of PAI-1 in the placebo group was higher than in both the BPS and control groups (Figure 3A).
Expression of eNOS in the BPS group was higher than in both the placebo and control groups (Figure 3B).
Real-time RT-PCR. The levels of expression of PAI-1, eNOS, Akt-1 and PI3K were represented numerically and compared; the value in the control group was set at 1.00.
SOS score for H&E staining at 48 h after euthanasia.
Expression of PAI-1 in the placebo group was significantly higher than in the BPS and control groups (control: 1.00; placebo: 185.39; BPS: 0.23; control vs. placebo: p=0.00088; placebo vs. BPS: p=0.00088; Figure 3C).
Expression of eNOS in the BPS group was higher than in the placebo and control groups (control: 1.00; placebo: 0.16; BPS: 1.78; control vs. placebo: p<0.0001; placebo vs. BPS: p=0.021; Figure 3D).
Expression of Akt-1 in the placebo group was significantly lower than in the BPS and control groups (control: 1.00; placebo: 0.27; BPS: 1.09; control vs. placebo: p<0.0001; placebo vs. BPS: p=0.004; Figure 3E).
Expression of PI3K in the placebo group was significantly lower than in the BPS and control groups (control: 1.00; placebo: 0.25; BPS: 1.57; control vs. placebo: p<0.0001; placebo vs. BPS: p=0.0018; Figure 3F).
Blood chemistry test results. No significant intergroup differences were found between WBC counts (control: 23.7±8.6×102 cells/μl; placebo: 17.8±7.5×102 cells/μl; BPS: 20.8±8.1×102 cells/μl; n=10; control vs. placebo: p=0.36; placebo vs. BPS: p=1.20).
The platelet count in the placebo group was significantly lower than in the BPS and control groups (control: 70.1±18.6×104/μl; placebo: 4.84±3.21×104/μl; BPS: 48.2±11.9×104/μl; n=10; control vs. placebo: p<0.0001; placebo vs. BPS: p<0.0001).
AST, ALT and LDH levels were significantly higher in the placebo group than in the BPS and control groups, as follows: (i) [AST] control: 75.2±17.3 IU/μl; placebo: 1,013.3±749.1 IU/μl; BPS: 129.9±63.3 IU/μl; n=10; control vs. placebo: p=0.0010; placebo vs. BPS: p=0.014; (ii) [ALT] control: 28.6±8.2 IU/μl; placebo: 923.9±659.4 IU/μl; BPS: 90.2±119.0 IU/μl; n=10; control vs. placebo: p=0.0060; placebo vs. BPS: p=0.0084; and (iii) [LDH] control: 290.3±115.3 IU/μl; placebo: 2,477.6±2,177.2 IU/μl; BPS: 372.2±191.5 IU/μl; n=10; control vs. placebo: p=0.033; placebo vs. BPS: p=0.041.
The hyaluronic acid level in the placebo group was significantly higher than in the BPS and control groups (control: 182.3±50.2 IU/μl; placebo: 2243.0±1135.9 IU/μl; BPS: 670.6±184.3 IU/μl; n=10; control vs. placebo: p=0.00085; placebo vs. BPS: p=0.0058).
Evaluation of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome and sinusoidal endothelial cells. A, B: Visual examination: Female Crl:CD1(ICR) mice were divided into the following three groups: (i) control group; (ii) placebo group (administered 270 mg/kg MCT); and (iii) BPS group (administered 270 mg/kg MCT + 200 μg/kg BPS). The BPS was administered intraperitoneally 1 h before, and then both 3 and 9 h after MCT. The mice were killed 48 h later. Massive bloody ascites and dark red coloration of the liver were found in the placebo group. No ascites was found in the BPS group, and the coloration was also similar to that of the control group. These changes became more marked after perfusion from the portal vein. C: H&E staining: In the placebo group, sinusoidal dilation and blood congestion were found centered in zone 3. However, these signs were suppressed in the BPS group and were approximately the same as the control group. D, E, F: Immunostaining: SE-1: Staining of the sinusoids in zone 3 was reduced in the placebo group, whereas in the BPS group, there was clear staining along the sinusoids while the LSECs were protected. CD42b: In the placebo group, staining was found centered around the space of Disse in zone 3, suggesting EPA; expression was reduced in the BPS group. Caspase-3: In the placebo group, caspase-3 expression was found centered in zone 3, suggesting apoptosis; expression was reduced in the BPS group. G, H, I: Evaluation of immunostaining using image J: Areas of SE-1, CD42b and Caspase-3 staining were evaluated using the average of five randomly selected images on image J. Significant differences were considered at *p<0.05, and **p<0.01, ***p<0.001.
The T-Bil level in the placebo group was significantly higher than in the control group, but showed no difference in the BPS group (control: 0.066±0.011 IU/μl; placebo: 0.155±0.026 IU/μl; BPS: 0.131±0.030 IU/μl; n=10; control vs. placebo: p<0.0001; placebo vs. BPS: p=0.21).
Discussion
This study clearly indicated that BPS administration can prevent SOS. In addition to inhibition of platelet aggregation, the suggested mechanisms of action of BPS include activation of the Akt-eNOS pathway mediated by PI3K; increase in nitric oxide production, resulting in induction of vasodilation; and protective effects of the LSECs.
SOS is a complication that may occur after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, liver transplantation, or hepatectomy after L-OHP-based chemotherapy and has a very poor prognosis (4, 7, 8). Although various causes have been suggested for SOS, including LSEC glutathione exhaustion, nitric oxide exhaustion, matrix metalloproteinase increase, and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) increase, its etiology has still not been elucidated (22). Various pharmacological agents are currently under investigation as potential treatments for SOS/VOD. Defibrotide has been reported to be effective and is approved for the treatment of SOS in both Europe and the USA (9), however, its use in Japan is still not permitted. Additionally, it has been suggested that antithrombin III, prostaglandin E1, low-molecular-weight heparin, and ursodeoxycholic acid are effective, although this has not been verified (10-13). Furthermore, there have been reports indicating that glutathione, matrix-metalloproteinase-inhibitors, phosphodiesterase III-inhibitors, and sorafenib can inhibit SOS in a rat model; however, use of these have not yet reached the clinical application stage (23-25).
Evaluation of connective tissue fibers around zone 3. A, B: Azan staining and silver-plating stain: Azan staining gave blue-purple staining centered around zone 3 in the placebo group. In the BPS group, black staining centered in zone 3 was observed after silver-plating stain, similarly to the control group. These findings suggest that in the placebo group, reticular fibers (Type III collagen) decreased while collagen fibers (Type I collagen) increased; in the BPS group, however, these changes were alleviated and EPA was inhibited. C, D: Evaluation of Azan staining and silver-plating stain using image J: Areas subjected to Azan and silver-plating stains were evaluated using the average of five randomly selected images on image J. Significant differences were considered at *p<0.05, and **p<0.01, ***p<0.001.
The pathology of SOS has not been fully elucidated; in terms of pathological findings, the initial stage of SOS is characterized by sinusoidal dilation in zone 3 surrounding the central vein, hepatocyte necrosis, blood congestion, and intimal edema. Later stages of SOS involve marked peripheral venous fibrosis and collagen deposition (5, 26). Onset of this condition may therefore be due to loss of the LSECs. The authors have previously reported that the principal etiology of SOS is via damage to LSECs; this results in their detachment and destruction, eventually causing organ dysfunction via sepsis (27, 28). This may lead to extravascular leakage of platelets, and thus, EPA in the space of Disse and various other pathologies related to platelet-derived factors (14, 16, 17). Platelets contain α-granules and dense granules; upon activation, strong proinflammatory chemokines included in these granules are released (29). These substances are proliferative factors and include TXA2, VEGF-A, TGF-β, and PAI-1. TXA2 has vasoconstrictive as well as platelet-aggregatory effects and induces portal hypertension by increasing portal resistance (30). VEGF-A is generally known for its vasodilatory effects, but is also used as an agent with opposite effects; vasoconstriction has been reported under conditions of incomplete vascular endothelium (31). It has therefore been reported that administration of bevacizumab, an anti-VEGF-A antibody, results in alleviation of SOS induced by oxaliplatin in terms of both incidence and severity (32). TGF-β is a strong, fibrosis-promoting cytokine that stimulates collagen synthesis mediated by hepatic stellate cells, as well as inhibits hepatocyte proliferation (33, 34). PAI-1 is a marker of vascular endothelial damage, but also inhibits the fibrinolysis reaction by deactivating both tissue-type plasminogen activator (t-PA) and urokinase-type plasminogen activator (u-PA). The hepatocyte proliferation factor is activated by u-PA, while PAI-1 inhibits u-PA, thus creating a hepatocyte-proliferation-inhibiting factor (35, 36). On the basis of the above findings, the authors consider that SOS itself may be caused by extravasated-platelet-derived factors, and that prophylactic treatment by LSEC protection is an important measure for responding to SOS.
Evaluation of vascular endothelial cell damage. A, B: Western blotting: PAI-1 expression was higher in the placebo group than in the BPS and control groups, while eNOS expression was higher in the BPS group than in the placebo and control groups. C, D, E, F: Real-time RT-PCR: PAI-1 was expressed more markedly in the placebo group than in the BPS and control groups, whereas eNOS, Akt-1 and PI3K were expressed at higher levels in the BPS group than in the placebo and control groups. Significant differences were considered at *p<0.05, and **p<0.01, ***p<0.001.
This study was an investigation as to whether BPS, a PGI2 derivative, has therapeutic or prophylactic effects in SOS. PGI2 is produced via prostaglandin endoperoxide by enzymes such as phospholipase A2, cyclooxygenase, and PGI2 synthase (37). According to previous reports, in addition to anti-platelet effects, vasodilatory effects and anti-inflammatory effects (38), PGI2 has vascular endothelial protective, as well as anti-apoptotic effects (39). BPS is a synthetic PGI2 analogue that has higher chemical and metabolic stability than PGI2. In a study using a rat model with pulmonary emphysema induced by cigarette smoke extract, Chen et al. demonstrated that administration of BPS reduced caspase-3 expression, and had an anti-apoptotic effect (40). In addition, BPS binds the IP receptor, and the IP receptor activates Gs, which activates adenylyl cyclase via Gs. Activation of the IP receptor increases the level of cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP), thus inducing vasodilation, and inhibiting platelet function (41). BPS also activates cAMP-dependent protein kinase A, thus inducing nitric oxide production and vasodilation via eNOS phosphorylation (42).
Togawa et al. have reported that BPS, a synthetic PGI2 analogue, induces expression of Akt (i.e. protein kinase B) (43). PGI2 acts as a ligand with a G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR), thus activating PI3K as well as eNOS via phosphorylation by Akt; the kinase is positioned downstream, resulting in promotion of nitric oxide production (44, 45). Regarding insulin acting similarly to a GPCR ligand, Kubota et al. have demonstrated that in obese patients with type-2 diabetes, blockage of insulin signal transmission by endothelial cells reduces insulin-receptor substrate-2 expression, as well as insulin-induced eNOS phosphorylation; this induces the attenuation of insulin-induced capillary recruitment and insulin delivery, reducing glucose uptake via the skeletal muscles (19). Conversely, Kubota et al. have also reported, using a murine model, that recovery of eNOS phosphorylation by endothelial cells has the opposite effect, reducing attenuation of insulin-induced capillary recruitment and insulin delivery and leading to recovery of endothelial cell function and glucose uptake (36). In connection with the PI3K-Akt pathway being linked to fundamental cell processes, including protein synthesis, cell proliferation, and cell survival, activation of this pathway results in eNOS increasing the release of phosphates and nitric oxide (43-45). In addition, activation of the PI3K-Akt-eNOS pathway has been reported to inhibit apoptosis of vascular endothelial cells (39, 46).
Conclusion
BPS administration has been shown to activate the PI3K-Akt-eNOS pathway, and to have anti-apoptotic effects on LSECs. It is suggested that LSEC functional enhancement due to BPS administration may inhibit EPA, thus preventing progression to SOS.
Footnotes
Authors' Contributions
Makoto Nakura, Tomoharu Miyashita and Yasuhiko Yamamoto made substantial contributions to the design and coordination of the study. Makoto Nakura, Satoshi Takada and Shunsuke Kanou carried out the immunohistochemistry. Makoto Nakura, Hidehiro Tajima and Hiroyuki Takamura collected the samples and data. Makoto Nakura and Tomoharu Miyashita analyzed the data. Tetsuo Ohta approved the final version of the manuscript. All Authors read and approved the final manuscript.
This article is freely accessible online.
Conflicts of Interest
The Authors report no proprietary or commercial interest in any product mentioned or concept discussed in this article.
- Received July 13, 2020.
- Revision received August 1, 2020.
- Accepted August 3, 2020.
- Copyright© 2020, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved