Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleExperimental Studies

Mosaic Recombinant Adeno-associated Virus Vector rAAV/DJ/CAG for Targeted Gene Delivery to Melanoma Cells Metastasized to the Lung

MILENA CZAJKA, AGNIESZKA ZAJKOWSKA, MACIEJ GAWLAK, MAGDALENA BUJALSKA-ZADROZNY and MACIEJ MALECKI
Anticancer Research August 2020, 40 (8) 4425-4444; DOI: https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.14448
MILENA CZAJKA
1Department of Applied Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: milena.czajka{at}wum.edu.pl
AGNIESZKA ZAJKOWSKA
1Department of Applied Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MACIEJ GAWLAK
2Department of Pharmacodynamics, Centre for Preclinical Research and Technology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MAGDALENA BUJALSKA-ZADROZNY
2Department of Pharmacodynamics, Centre for Preclinical Research and Technology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MACIEJ MALECKI
1Department of Applied Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background/Aim: Patients with metastasized melanoma have limited treatment options and poor diagnosis. Therefore, the development of treatments requires a new therapeutic approach, of which gene therapy using rAAV vectors can be proposed. The aim of the study was to examine the efficiency of the rAAV vector to transduce mouse melanoma cells both in vitro and in vivo. Materials and Methods: Different rAAV serotypes encoding GFP under the control of both chicken beta-actin and cytomegalovirus promoters were used in the experiments. Intranasal, intraperitoneal, intravenous and intratumoral pathways of administration of rAAV vectors were tested using quantitative-PCR and immunohistochemical staining. Results: The highest transduction efficiency in metastatic cells in vivo was observed 7 days after intranasal administration of a 1010 gc/0.03 ml dose of rAAV/DJ-CAG. Conclusion: Melanoma gene therapy based on rAAV vectors is a possible treatment option.

  • Melanoma
  • metastatic melanoma
  • rAAV
  • intranasal delivery
  • lungs

Melanoma is a tumor that derives from pigment cells — melanocytes, which develop from the neural tissue of integuments. The most common starting point of melanoma is the skin, but it may also be formed within the mucous membranes of the gastrointestinal tract or in the eyeball. It is a cancer with a high potential for metastasis (1, 2). Despite the progress in anti-cancer treatment, the number of deaths due to metastatic melanoma is still increasing and from the beginning of 2019 circa 7,000 patients in the USA died of it (1). Its aggressiveness causes as much as 90% of deaths among all skin cancers (3). The median survival of patients with melanoma who have distant metastases is shorter than 1 year (4). In the initial stage, the disease is curable, but unfortunately in the advanced stage, when metastasis occurs, it is practically incurable (5). The treatment, which has so far been proposed for the advanced stage, does not provide the desired benefit and the survival of these patients remains unsatisfactory. For instance, the annual survival rate after treatment with targeted therapy for the dual BRAF/MEK mutation is only about 50-60% (4, 6). Therefore, one of the future therapeutic approaches in the treatment of metastatic melanoma can be gene therapy using rAAV vectors, especially with the use of hybrid serotypes, which can achieve high efficiency of gene delivery (7-9).

AAV viruses are non-pathogenic, small (approx. 25 nm in diameter) and infect both dividing and non-dividing cells. A distinguishing trait of rAAV is also the occurrence of various serotypes, which are characterized by strong tropism to selected cell types, making them ideal candidates for gene therapy (10). rAAV viruses have become increasingly popular in clinical trials (11, 12). In recent years, two pharmaceutical products using rAAV vectors – Glybera (13) and Luxturna (14) have been registered. Recent studies conducted on hybrid/mosaic serotypes have shown a greater transduction efficiency and are more heterogeneous, both in cellular and tissue specificity (15). The new rAAV vectors are created by a number of innovative techniques, including site-directed mutagenesis, Cry-Em and a recent novum – the CRISPR method (16). With the CRISPR method it is possible to edit a genome (17), modulate gene expression (16-18) or to distinguish different nucleic acids of various Zika viruses (19). CRISPR is an innovative method that can be used for breakthrough discoveries and can serve as a tool for imaging live cells. First of all, its application is intended for the treatment of cancer (20, 21), cardiological diseases (22, 23), haematologic diseases (24), muscular dystrophy (25-27), and therapy at the level of human embryos, where it can be used to repair mutations (28, 29). Moreover, this method is also applied to improve the delivery of genes to cells with the use of rAAV vectors, which are an interesting group of carriers used in gene therapy (30-32). Genetic modifications of viral vectors using e.g. the CRISPR method, are intended to increase and improve the efficiency of the rAAV vector transduction. These methods, by manipulating the capsid surface, make it possible to avoid Nab neutralising antibodies, so that genes can be delivered more efficiently to cells (10).

Hybrid serotypes are known to be one of the strategies for improving gene delivery to cells (33). Grimm et al. have published a rAAV/DJ construct that seems to be a carrier with an increased ability for cancer cell transduction. rAAV/DJ is a serotype formed by the intersection of eight different wild AAV serotypes by combining the capsids of these vectors (34). Thanks to these modifications, the rAAV/DJ vector exhibits a wider range of tropism and better transduction efficiency. In addition, it is less immunogenic compared to other rAAV vectors, because it has the ability to avoid neutralising antibodies (34-36). Therefore, the rAAV/DJ vector is a promising carrier that can be used for the treatment of cancers e.g. in cancers that metastasize to the lungs, including melanoma (7, 37, 38).

In modern times, non-invasive systems for gene delivery are sought (39-41). A promising route of administration has been suggested to be intranasal administration, where in recent years, has been shown to be a biopharmaceutically privileged, readily accessible and susceptible area when it comes to the administration of medications and, importantly, construct vectors based on adenoviruses and adeno-associated viruses, but also on others, e.g. herpes virus and lentivirus (42). The intranasal route has been used in many studies as a favorable route of administration (43-45), and is particularly beneficial in providing medication to the bronchus (46-50). Zahoor et al., Justo et al. and others have suggested that lung diseases can be treated by inhalation (51-55). Santry et al. have shown that the intranasal route can serve to supply rAAV vectors directly to the lungs (40). The intranasal route can also be used to deliver medicines to other organs. For example, the beneficial use of this route of administration is inter alia: administration of insulin in the treatment of Alzheimer's disease (56-58), eye medications including erythropoietin, which saves photoreceptors in the degenerative retina (59), migraine treatment (60), epilepsy (61) and depressive diseases (62). The intranasal route of administration allows us to achieve both local and systemic effects (63). Therefore, intranasal administration is considered an alternative non-invasive route of administration of medications, including gene preparations, which can produce a therapeutic effect with very high efficacy (64).

In our experiments, we used rAAV vector serotypes rAAV2/1-rAAV2/9 and rAAV/DJ. The tests were conducted with the rAAV under the control of both the cytomegalovirus (CMV) and the CMV early enhancer element, and chicken beta-actin (CAG) promoters encoding a GFP reporter gene.

The purpose of this study is directly linked to the determination of the suitability of molecular marking B16-F10 cells with the use of rAAV vectors both in vitro and in vivo. The efficacy of mouse melanoma cell transduction was evaluated with the use of a fluorescence microscopy, qPCR, Countess II FL Automated Cell Counter, immunohistochemical staining and ELISA. Our research showed the usefulness of rAAV vectors for the delivery of reporter genes into mouse metastasized cells, through the intranasal, intraperitoneal, intravenous, and intratumoral routes of administration. The highest infection efficiency was observed after intranasal administration of the rAAV vector, the rAAV/DJ serotype. These discoveries underline the efficient administration of selected rAAV vectors to melanoma cells.

Materials and Methods

rAAV vectors. Recombinant AAV vectors were purchased from VECTOR BIOLABS (Malvern, PA USA). We used serotypes rAAV1-rAAV6, rAAV8-rAAV9 and rAAV/DJ vectors. This rAAV serotype virus expresses eGFP (enhanced Green Fluorescent Protein) under the control of the CMV or a hybrid of the CMV early enhancer element and chicken beta-actin promoter (CAG). Titer of the original stocks: 1×1013 gc/ml.

Cell lines. Two cell lines were used: the mouse melanoma line: B16-F10 (ATCC® CRL-6475™, Manassas, VA, USA) and the mouse fibroblast cell line: NIH/3T3 (ATCC® CRL-1658™) used as a control. The cell lines were maintained in the Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium (Gibco® BRL, Life Technologies™, Waltham, MA USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Lonza, Biowhittaker, Walkersville, MD, USA) and the antibiotic/antimycotic solution (AAS) (Gibco®Life Technologies™). The cells were maintained under standard conditions (at 37°C and in a humidified 5% CO2 atmosphere).

Cell transduction procedure. B16-F10 and NIH/3T3 cells were seeded on 6 cm diameter dishes at the density of 5×104 and 1×105, respectively. After 24 h, complete media (DMEM with 10% FBS) were changed to DMEM with 2% FBS. rAAV vectors were moved from −80°C to room temperature, and underwent a gentle vortex and a short spin. Then, they were added to cells with a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 40,000. The DMEM was replaced every 48 h. Seven days later, the efficiency of cell transduction was evaluated using several methods.

Evaluation of the cell transduction efficiency.

Microscopic image analysis. Imaging of the cells after transduction was performed using the inverted fluorescent microscope Olympus IX53, with the 10× objective in both the Brightfield (BF) and fluorescent light (FITC). Editing of images was performed with an Olympus cellSens2010 software.

Countness™ II Automated Cell Counter (ThermoFisher). Media were removed, cells were rinsed with PBS and trypsinized (Trypsin-EDTA Solution 1×, Sigma-Aldrich®, Saint Louis, MO, USA). After 4 min of incubation at 37°C, the cells were harvested and 4 ml of DMEM was added. Ten μl of the suspension was then applied to the cell counting slide (EVE™ Cell Counting Slides, NanoEnTek), the appropriate profile was selected (with the use EVOS LED Light Cube GFP: ALexaFluor488) and the cells showing GFP expression were counted.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Diagram showing the administration of rAAV vectors to B16-F10 melanoma tumor-bearing C57BL/6J mice. A: melanoma model with lung metastasis that used intranasal (IN) and intraperitoneal (IP) administration of rAAV vectors, B: melanoma skin model that used intravenous (IV) and intratumoral (IT) administration of rAAV vectors.

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. After transduction, total protein was isolated using the RIPA buffer composition (Tris Cl pH 7.5 10 mM, NaCl 150 mM, NP40 1%, sodium deoxycholate 0.5%, SDS 0.1%, water), containing a protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma-Aldrich®). For the determination of GFP protein concentration in cells after transduction, an enzymatic immunoassay (GFP ELISA Kit, AKR-121, CELL BIOLABS, INC., San Diego, CA, USA) was used. Total protein was diluted 1:100 and then GFP was determined according to the manufacturer's protocol. The standard curve was prepared using the dilution series of recombinant GFP standard, in the concentration range of 0 ng/ml to 2 ng/ml in Assay Diluent, included in the GFP ELISA kit.

qPCR. After transduction of the rAAV vectors, total DNA from B16-F10 and NIH/3T3 cells was isolated according to the manufacturer's protocol, in the High Pure Viral Nucleic Acid Kit (Roche Life Science). qPCR was performed on the StepOnePlus Real Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems®) using the Taqman® Universal Master Mix II, with UNG (Applied Biosystems®), and probe/primer sets were designed to recognize the ITR sequence. Reverse: 5’CGGCCTCAGTGAGCGA3’, Forward 5’GGAACCCCTAGTGAT GGAGTT3’ and probe 6-FAM-CACTCCCTCTCTGCGCGC-TAMRA (65). A dilution series of the calibration curve using pAAV-IRES-hrGFP (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) was used to quantitatively evaluate the copy number of the ITR sequence present in tissues and cells. The standard curve included a range between 10 and 1010 molecules. All samples were analysed in triplicate using 50 ng total DNA/sample.

Gene expression. Total RNA from B16-F10 and NIH/3T3 cells was isolated using TRI Reagent Solution™ (Invitrogen™). Reverse transcription was performed using the High Capacity RNA-to-cDNA kit (Applied Biosystems™) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Gene expression was investigated with TaqMan® Array 96-WELL FAST Plates (Applied Biosystems™): mouse lipid regulated genes (cat no: 4415461) and mouse ABC transporters (cat no: 4418752). All samples were analysed in duplicate using 100 ng total RNA/sample. The relative gene expression was calculated using the ΔΔCq method. The results were analyzed using the ExpressionSuite Software v 1.1.

In vivo gene transfer experiments

Animals, B16-F10 cells, rAAV vectors. C57BL/6J mice of both sexes, aged approximately 8-10 weeks, obtained from the Mossakowski Medical Research Centre, Polish Academy of Sciences, were used. The animals were bred at a temperature of about 21°C, with free access to food and water, and on a 12 h/12 h day/night cycle, in the animal laboratory of Center for Preclinical Research and Technology, Medical University of Warsaw. The experiments were performed after obtaining the approval of the WUM Ethical Committee (consent no. 60/2013). The scheme of the experiment is shown in Figure 1.

In our studies, a metastatic and a localized mouse melanoma model were used (Figure 1). The B16-F10 cells were maintained in standard conditions, supplemented with 10% FBS. Cells were introduced to C57BL/6J laboratory mice. Melanoma cells at the density of 3×105/0.1 ml PBS/mouse were administered intravenously (Figure 1A) or subcutaneously (Figure 1B). The selected mice also received B16-F10 cells, which were previously subjected to rAAV in vitro transduction (Figure 1). Seven days after administration of melanoma cells, the mice were checked for the presence of dermal melanoma (Figure 1B), while after 14 days they were checked for lung metastasis (Figure 1A). The presence or not of tumors determined the further experiments. rAAV vectors were transduced to the animals. Based on the in vitro studies, rAAV vectors with the highest efficiency of transduction in mouse melanoma cells were selected. For this purpose, 0.03 ml and 0.1 ml of vector formulations were made containing rAAV vectors of the titer 1010 copies (Figure 1A and B). The control animals were administered 0.03 ml and 0.1 ml of 0.9% sodium chloride solution.

Preparation for intranasal administration: A gene formulation containing 1010 gc of the rAAV vector at the total volume of 0.03 ml was administered directly into the nasal cavity, by dropping it into the nostrils using pipettes and sterile tips. Mice spontaneously and passively inhaled the gene formulation administered to them (Figure 2). Seven days after the administration, the animals were sacrificed in order to collect pulmonary tissue and other organs, to estimate the biodistribution of rAAV vectors after using the intranasal route of administration.

Preparation for intraperitoneal administration: Properly prepared 1010 gc of rAAV vectors at the total volume of 0.1 ml were given directly into the peritoneal cavity (Figure 1A). Seven days after the administration, the animals were sacrificed to collect pulmonary tissue and other organs to estimate the biodistribution of rAAV vectors via the intraperitoneal route of administration.

Preparation for intravenous administration: 1010 gc of rAAV vectors at the total volume of 0.1 ml were administered directly to the caudal vein of the laboratory mice (Figure 1B). Seven days after the administration, the animals were sacrificed to collect cutaneous tumors and other organs, to estimate the biodistribution of rAAV vectors via the intravenous route of administration.

Preparation for intratumoral administration: A total of 1010 gc of rAAV at the total volume of 0.1 ml was administered directly to the tumor (Figure 1B). Seven days after administration, animals were sacrificed in order to collect cutaneous tumors and other organs, to estimate the biodistribution of rAAV vectors via the intratumoral route of administration.

Transduction of B16-F10 cells with rAAV/DJ-CAG: Melanoma cells were prepared according to the cell transduction procedure protocol (see Materials and Methods). The efficiency of the transduction was analysed 7 days after rAAV transduction, to determine whether at least 80% of GFP positive cells were administered to the laboratory mice at the density of 3×105/mouse. The transductants developed in this way were then administered subcutaneously or intravenously to produce metastatic melanoma in the lungs. After 7 days, in the case of intradermal administration and after 14 days in the metastatic model, tissues were collected to estimate the transduction efficiency (Figure 1).

Immunohistochemistry. Immunofluorescence analysis was used to assess the efficiency of transduction in B16-F10 cells. The study used C57BL/6J laboratory mice with melanoma and lung metastases, which were administered rAAV gene formulations via the intranasal or intraperitoneal route (Figure 1A). Seven days after administration of rAAV vectors, the animals were perfused with PBS (100 ml of PBS per 100 g of body weight) and 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA, 100 ml per 100 g of body weight). Then, organs were dissected and transferred to 4-8°C overnight. Next, tissues were immersed at 4-8°C in 30% sucrose three times for about 72 h. After that, organs were frozen in dry-ice-cold heptane, cut in a cryostat (Leica CM1950) into 15 slices and mounted on slides (ThermoScientific, SUPERFLOST® PLUS). For immunohistochemical staining, slices were incubated in normal donkey serum (Abcam, ab7475) in PBS containing 0.3% Triton X-100, for 1 h at room temperature (RT), in a humid chamber. Next, the primary antibodies were added: anti-GFP (Abcam, ab5450; 1:500) and anti-melanoma (Abcam, ab137078; 1:500) for 1 h at RT and then transferred to a refrigerator for 24 h. After 24 h, the slices were rinsed with PBS containing Triton X-100 (Sigma-Aldrich®), and then incubated with secondary donkey anti-rabbit antibody (Abcam, ab150075; 1:500) and donkey anti-goat antibody (Abcam, ab175704) at RT for 1.5 h. After washing with PBS containing Triton X-100 slices were coversliped. Images were collected using the confocal laser scanning microscope Olympus FV1000 and analysed with Fiji/ImageJ (66).

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Intranasal administration of the rAAV gene formulation to laboratory mice of the C57BL/6J strain.

qPCR. Total DNA from animal tissues, collected after administration of the rAAV vectors, was isolated using the genomic Maxi or Midi kit (depending on the weight of material used) (A&A Biotechnology, Gdynia, Poland). qPCR was performed as described above (see Evaluation of the cell transduction efficiency; qPCR).

Statistical analysis. All results are shown as mean±standard deviation. Each experiment was conducted at least three times. The results are presented at the significance level: *p<0.05, **p<0.01 and ***p<0.001. In all cases, one-way variety ANOVA test was used. The Statistica 13.1 software was used.

Results

Transduction efficiency of rAAV vectors to melanoma and fibroblast cells in vitro. B16-F10 melanoma cells and mice NIH/3T3 fibroblast control cells were transduced using ten different serotypes of adeno-associated viruses. rAAV vectors were used in three different MOI=200, 20,000 (both data not shown) and 40,000. rAAV demonstrated the GFP protein expression. Serotypes rAAV2/2 and rAAV/DJ were given in variants containing two different promoters in order to check whether a particular promoter affects the efficiency of GFP expression. The transduction efficiency was measured 7 days after the administration of rAAV vectors using several methods: a fluorescence microscope with the use of which the preparations were viewed at 10× magnification in bright light and fluorescent light, with excitation and emission spectrum peak wavelengths of approximately 495 nm/519 nm (Figure 3A and B). This allows a visual estimation of the cells that demonstrates the protein expression of green fluorescence. The cells were viewed every two days, until the transduction efficiency appeared to be increasing over time (data not shown). Another method used was to measure the percentage of positive GFP cells using the corresponding AlexaFluor488 fluorescence channel in the Countness™ Automated Cell Counter (Figure 3C). The highest transduction efficiency for B16-F10 cells was observed using the mosaic rAAV/DJ vector under the control of CAG and was on average 81.3% (the scientific test was conducted in five independent experiments) (Figure 3C), while the lowest was found for the serotypes rAAV2/5, rAAV2/8, and rAAV2/1. Using real-time PCR, the number of copies of the ITR sequences were determined in both tumor and control cells (Figure 3G). The qPCR reaction was used with 50 ng DNA/sample. The largest number of copies of the rAAV vector were observed in B16-F10 cells using the mosaic serotype under the control of CAG (with MOI=40000 the number of copies was about 7.4×107/50 ng DNA/sample). The highest transduction efficiency in B16-F10 cells was also observed using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays with approximately 8x105 pg GFP/ml (Figure 3E). Statistically significant differences were noted between hybrid serotypes and the regular vectors (***p<0.001) as shown in Figure 3D, F and H, where the dark grey color indicates the presence of statistically significant differences between the B16-F10 cells transduction performances and the light grey indicates the absence of statistically significant differences.

Assessment of the expression profile of lipid regulated genes in the B16-F10 and NIH/3T3 cells. The expression of lipid membrane transporters was evaluated. The tests were carried out in B16-F10 cells and the NIH/3T3 control cells. The 2-ΔΔCq method was used to assess expression. Only the results that showed expression below 0.5 and above 2 were used for analysis. The highest fold change was observed for the genes Apoe (approx. 10.4) and Insig1 (approx. 4.4). A significant decrease in the expression of Ptgs2 (approx. 0.002), Fads3 (approx. 0.008), Slc27a3 (approx. 0.008), Pla2gh4a (approx. 0.011), Alox15 (approx. 0.008), Slc16a16 (approx. 0.054), Slc27a1 (approx. 0.05), Nr1h3 (approx. 0.008) and Fabp5 (approx. 0.032) was observed. The results were normalized to the GAPDH housekeeping gene.

The expression of lipid regulated genes was also assessed. The 2−ΔΔCq method was used to assess gene expression. The control (non-transduced) and transduced B16-F10 cells were used for the analysis (Figure 4). Differences in fold changes were observed for a few genes. For example: regarding Hmgcs1, the use of the rAAV/DJ vector resulted in 1.17-fold increase in expression while the use of the rAAV/2 resulted in 0.7-fold decrease in expression. In addition, a slight decrease in the expression of the Gyk gene was noticed only after transduction with the serotype rAAV2/2 (0.928). Differences in gene expression were also noticed for other genes: Hmgcr, the use of the serotype rAAV/DJ slightly increased expression by 1.028, but the use of the serotype rAAV2/2 decreased expression by 0.81; Stard4, rAAV/DJ decreased expression by 0.382 while rAAV2/2 by 0.974; Slc16a6, expression was noticed only for serotype rAAV2/2; Slc27a1, increased expression only after transduction rAAV/DJ; Fabp5, transduction with rAAV/DJ decreased expression by 0.536 while transduction with rAAV2/2 reduced expression by 0.899; Apoe, decreased expression by 0.823 upon transductions with the serotype rAAV/DJ (0.823) but increased expression by 1.320 upon transduction with the serotype rAAV2/2. In addition, we were noticed about 7.5-fold changes for the Abca1 gene. The results were normalized to the Gusb housekeeping gene.

The expression of selected ABC transporters was also evaluated in the B16-F10 and NIH/3T3 cells. The 2−ΔΔCq method was used to assess gene expression. Only the results that showd expression below 0.5 and above 2 were used for analysis. As shown in Table II, individual ABC transporters genes showed decreased expression. The lowest expression was noticed for the Tap2 (approx. 0.005) and Tap1 genes (approx. 0.019). The results were normalized to the 18S housekeeping gene.

In our study, the expression of mouse ABC transporters was also assessed. The 2−ΔΔCq method was used to assess gene expression. The test was performed on the control (non-transduced) and transduced B16-F10 cells. Fold changes were observed in a few genes (Figure 5). The highest fold was observed after transduction with the rAAV/DJ only for Tap2 (approx. 27.4), Tap1 (approx. 14.465), and Abcd2 (approx. 13.16) genes. The fold changes were observed for Abca5 (approx. 2.938), Abcd4 (approx. 2.517), Absb9 (approx. 3.878), Abcd1 (approx. 2.826) in the case of serotype rAAV/DJ. Interestingly, the levels of Absb9 were elevated by approx. 17.663 following transduction with the rAAV2/2. The elevated level of gene expression was observed for Abcg4, Abca1, Abca8a, Abcb4, both after transduction with the rAAV/DJ and rAAV2/2. The results were normalized to the Hprt1 housekeeping gene.

Transduction efficiency of rAAV/DJ and rAAV2/2 serotypes in vivo.

In vivo results of rAAV vector transduction are shown in Figures 6, 7, and 8.

Based on the selection of a rAAV vector of rAAV/DJ-CAG, which showed the highest tropism in the direction of melanoma B16-F10 cells in in vitro studies (Figure 3), in vivo studies were conducted. The B16-F10/rAAV/GFP transductants were tested. As shown in Figure 6, after subcutaneous administration of the transductants, the presence of about 1.19×104 copies of rAAV/50 ng DNA/total sample was found, which was about 10 times less compared to that seen with intravenous administration. Statistically significant differences were observed at the level of *p<0.05.

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

Efficiency of rAAV transduction of B16-F10 cells and NIH/3T3 cells measured using: (A: B16-F10 and B: NIH/3T3) a fluorescence microscope, (C) Countness™ Automated Cell Counter, (E) ELISA, (G) real-time PCR. (D, F, H) The results are presented as the mean±standard deviation ***p<0.001 using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Dark Grey: statistically significant differences; bright grey: no statistically significant differences. BF-brightfield; FITC-Fluorescein Isothiocyanate.

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

The relative expression of lipid regulated genes in B16-F10 cells after transduction with the rAAV vectors compared to non-transduced B16-F10 cells (defined as 1-fold change).

Figure 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 5.

The relative expression of ABC transporters in B16-F10 cells after transduction with the rAAV vectors compared to non-transduced B16-F10 cells (defined as 1-fold change).

Based on the in vitro studies, we chose the serotypes with the highest tropism for mouse melanoma B16-F10 cells. Animal studies were conducted in three independent experiments. Two models of melanoma were proposed: metastatic and subcutaneous. In a model that had been developed in the lungs, B16-F10 cells, cultured under standard conditions (37°C and 5% CO2), were administered in the concentration of 3×105 per mouse/tail vein. After about 14 days, metastases were observed in the lungs. At that time, we administered rAAV preparations at a dose of 1010 gc/mouse using both the intranasal and intraperitoneal routes. Seven days after administration, we collected pulmonary tissue and other organs for assessing the transduction efficiency and biodistribution of the preparations (Figure 1A). To evaluate the effectiveness of the rAAV infections, we used the qPCR method with the pAAV-IRES-hrGFP vector as a standard curve. The results (Figure 7A and C) depict the highest efficiency of the rAAV/DJ vector under control of the CAG promoter, which was obtained after intranasal administration of approximately 1.33×104 copies/50 ng DNA/sample and intraperitoneal administration of 5.49×103 copies/50ng DNA/sample. Intranasal administration (Figure 7A) was more effective compared to intraperitoneal administration (**p<0.01). Based on the presented results (Figure 3A, C, E, G), it can also be concluded that higher transduction efficiency is observed after introduction with rAAV/DJ and rAAV2/2 containing the CAG promoter. In the model of skin melanoma, we used both the intratumoral (Figure 7G) and intravenous (Figure 7E) route of administration of rAAV vectors. After intravenous administration (Figure 7E) the vectors were administered at a concentration of 1010 gc/mouse tail vein. Seven days after administration of the rAAV vectors, tumors and other organs were collected to estimate rAAV biodistribution. The greatest transduction efficiency was observed after the administration of rAAV vectors directly to the tumor tissue and was approximately 1.13×104 copies/50 ng DNA/sample (Figure 7G), which confirms in vitro results. Based on the in vivo studies, we demonstrated the highest efficiency of the rAAV/DJ under control of the CAG promoter using all routes of administration. The most effective was intranasal delivery of rAAV to melanoma cells in the lungs (Figure 7A). The control laboratory animals were administered 0.9% NaCl. Results are not presented because no copies of the ITR sequence were observed.

Figure 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 6.

Increased number of rAAV copies in the tumors after B16/F10/rAAV/DJ-CAG-GFP intravenous (iv) or subcutaneous (s.c.) administration.

Mice received 1010 genome copies of rAAV by intranasal or intraperitoneal administration. GFP expression was assessed in metastatic lung cells at 7 days after vector administration by anti-GFP immunohistochemical analysis. Immunohistochemical staining was used to estimate the presence of rAAV vectors. Antibodies were used against both lung metastatic melanoma cells (see tumor marker) and against the GFP protein (see GFP immunodetection). As shown in Figure 8, GFP protein expression was observed in metastatic melanoma cells only when rAAV/DJ was administered by both the intranasal and intraperitoneal route.

It is interesting that the highest transduction efficiency in the lung tissue in in vitro conditions was recorded after the intranasal administration of the rAAV/DJ serotype (this is also shown in Figure 7). In Figure 8 we can also observe a stronger effect of the CAG promoter on melanoma cell metastases to the lungs.

Discussion

Melanoma is an aggressive malignant tumor formed by the uncontrolled growth of melanocytes. It is one of the deadliest forms of skin cancer. The most common location of melanoma is the skin, but it shows relatively high tendencies to metastasize outside the original location (67). The prognosis of patients with metastases to the lungs is particularly unfavorable and the survival rate of patients is very low (68, 69). For this reason, innovative solutions are being sought for the treatment of melanoma metastases to the lungs.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

The relative expression of lipid regulated genes in B16-F10 cells compared to NIH/3T3 cells (defined as 1-fold change).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table II.

The relative expression of ABC transporters genes in B16-F10 cells compared to NIH/3T3 (defined as 1-fold change).

In modern times, one of the promising and alternative approaches to the treatment of many diseases, including cancer, is gene therapy. One of the gene therapy strategies used in cancer, including a form that metastasizes to the lungs, is the administration of viral vectors carrying therapeutic genes through the intranasal route (39). It is a promising method of treatment (administration) and for the identification of cancer cells in the lungs. Its additional advantage is the high safety of administration and the selectivity of gene transfer directly to bronchial tree cells (40, 70-73). The success of gene therapy is determined by the safe and effective introduction of a therapeutic transgene into cells (74). One of the current methodological challenges is the selection of an appropriate vector that, when introduced to the target cell, will have a high transduction efficiency (75). Scientists have been constantly working on developing appropriate gene carriers that will produce the desired results and meet the challenges associated with gene delivery (74). To date, viral vectors are the most common vectors for gene transfer. Their high transduction efficiency of cells has been determined. However, they can sometimes be problematic when it comes to their use in clinical trials, due to their immunogenicity and toxicity (69, 75, 76). Among the viral carriers, great interest has been shown for adeno-associated viruses, rAAV, due to their high safety profile. They can be used for gene therapy of metastatic lung tumors such as melanoma, which has been shown in post-mortem analysis that in as much as 70% of cases metastasizes to the lungs (38, 77). In our studies, rAAV/GFP vectors were used to identify the melanoma cells that metastasize to the lungs. The tests were conducted in both in vitro (Figures 3, 4, and 5) and in vivo conditions (Figures 6, 7, and 8). The experiment diagram is presented in Figure 1. In the analysis of the transduction efficiency, several rAAV serotypes were used in in vitro cultures, as well as in in vivo conditions in two melanoma models: skin and metastatic. It was established that B16-F10 cells were transduced both in in vitro and in vivo conditions with the highest efficiency by using the rAAV/DJ-GFP serotype. Most likely, this is related to the construction of the capsid. It is known that the construction of individual vector capsids affects the efficiency of gene transfer to cells, as has been indicated in previous studies (12, 33-36). The high transduction of mouse melanoma cells of approximately 80% (Figure 3C) that was demonstrated in this work may suggest that there are specific characteristic rAAV receptors on the surface of B16-F10 cells. In the studies of Tsoukalas et al. in B16-F10 cells, the presence of receptors such as sialic acid (78), heparin sulfate (79), gangliosidine (80), FGFR (81), VEGFR (82) and αVβ5 integrins (83) has been demonstrated. The rAAV/DJ vector consists of rAAV2, rAAV4, rAAV5, rAAV8, rAAV9 and avian, bovine and goat serotypes (34). Szmidt et al. have described one of the vectors that belongs to AAV/DJ-BAAV (84). In their studies, they have shown that the main receptor for BAAV is the ganglioside receptor. This receptor is also present on the surface of B16-F10 cells (80), and a higher transduction efficiency was observed in these cells as compared to mouse fibroblast cells. As reported by Fishmann et al. there are no gangliosides on the surface of NIH/3T3 cells (85). In our experiments, the transduction efficiency of NIH/3T3 cells was almost imperceptible (Figure 3). An additional advantage that can result in such high transduction in mouse melanoma cells is the presence of serotypes that infect B16-F10 cells using HSPG and sialic acid (respectively rAAV2, rAAV4 and rAAV5 serotypes) (86-88). In addition, caprine AAV capsid is 94% similar to the rAAV5 capsid, and has also high transduction efficiency in the above-mentioned cells (89). Van Lieshout et al. have indicated the presence of a proteoglycan receptor for laminine, which in the context of our research may explain the increase in the transduction of B16-F10 cells by the hybrid serotype rAAV/DJ in vitro (Figure 3) and in vivo (Figures 6, 7 and 8) (72). Effective design of gene therapy involves not only the selection of the right vector, but also the selection of the right promoter. In the rAAV construction, common promoters are used, which include, among others, CMV, EF1a, SV40 or CAG (90). In our research, we focused on the use of CMV and CAG promoters. The choice of a promoter is extremely important in targeted gene therapy and, thus, in the individualization of treatment (90-92). We noticed that improved transduction efficiency in melanoma cells in in vitro and in vivo conditions was obtained by the CAG promoter (Figures 3, 7, and 8). This may be related to published observations that some promoters are silenced in certain cell types (93). The importance of choosing the right promoter has also been shown by Grey et al., where the CMV promoter, compared to CAG, was silenced in the central nervous system cells (93). These studies noted that the CAG promoter is a stronger promoter in CNS cells and other cell types. The fact that the CAG promoter is more efficient as compared to other promoters has also been noted in the study of Alton et al., were the promoter's impact on the efficiency of transduction was also demonstrated (94). In that study, the authors also showed the importance of the route of administration and its effect on the transduction of several cell types.

Figure 7.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 7.

Transduction efficiency of the rAAV/DJ and rAAV2/2 vectors driven by the CAG and CMV promoters. The results are shown as mean±standard deviation. Statistically significant differences were observed between particular serotypes; at the significance level **p<0.01. (A and C) results show the transduction efficiency of the rAAV vectors in the lung metastatic melanoma, including intranasal (A) and intraperitoneal (C) route of administration. (E and G) results present transduction efficiency in cutaneous tumors (E) using the intravenous route of administration and the intratumoral (F) route of administration. (B, D, F, H) results show the biodistribution of particular rAAV vectors to mice organs.

The results of the in vitro transduction efficiency are presented in Figure 3, which shows that the transduction efficiency of B16-F10 cells measured using the Automated Cell Counter (Figure 3C) for the rAAV1-rAAV6 and rAAV9 vectors does not coincide with the number of copies of the ITR sequence measured using the qPCR method (Figure 3G). Such results may be the result of degradation by the ubiquitin-proteasome (36). Therefore, the qPCR method may show the number of copies for each serotype (Figure 3G), but the expression of the GFP protein in the cells can be decreased as presented in Figure 3A, C and E. It is interesting that the rAAV/DJ vector showed high transduction efficiency both using the positive GFP cells measurement method (about 80%) (Figure 3C) and the qPCR method (approx. 7×107 genome copies) (Figure 3G). For this reason, scientists are considering vectors that can avoid degradation within the cell and demonstrate effective expression. A positive candidate is the hybrid vector rAAV/DJ, which can avoid degradation by the proteasome by bypassing phosphorylation and then ubiquitination as has been shown by Mao et al. (36). The rAAV transduction efficiency also depends on the intracellular factors described by Nonnenmacher et al. among which we can mention, inter alia, membrane cholesterol, actin, Cdc42, Arf1, GRAF1, Rab proteins, PLA2, CLIC/GEEC pathway and others (95). In our research, the expression of lipid genes and ABC transporters was assessed. Fold change results are shown in Table I, Table II, Figures 4 and 5. On the basis of the results gathered in Table I, increased fold changes in the expression of the genes Insig1 (approx. 4.4) and Apoe (approx. 10.4) in B16-F10 cells was observed compared to NIH/3T3 cells.

A potential increase in the expression of the Insig1 gene may promote increased rAAV transduction through increased cholesterol synthesis. As it has already been mentioned by Nonnenmacher et al., the amount of membrane cholesterol may indirectly promote increased infection by viral vectors (95). Zhang et al. have shown the relationship between increased expression of the Insig1 gene in HIV-1 infection (96). These studies showed that virus infection regulates sterol synthesis as a strategy to facilitate viral replication.

In addition, an increase in the expression of the SREBF1 gene in cells after transduction (Figure 4) was observed, which was related to the Insig1 gene (Figure 9). This gene plays a key role in binding to the sterol regulatory elements of about 30 genes needed to capture and synthesize cholesterol and fatty acids (96). Its increase in expression may promote the internalization of rAAV vectors in B16-F10 cells compared to the NIH/3T3 control cells (Table I). Liu et al. have also observed an increase in Insig1 expression before virus infection (97).

In addition, in non-transducted B16-F10 cells an increase in the rate of the Apoe gene (Table I) compared to NIH/3T3 cells was noted. Siddigui et al. have shown that the increase in the expression of this gene can affect the growth of cell infections by HIV by increasing its production (98). This was related to an increase in the location of viral envelope proteins on the surface of cells. As has been shown by Siddigui et al., a decrease in Apoe expression may cause vector degradation in lysosomes (98). These studies may indicate that mouse melanoma cells are prone to transduction by the rAAV vector. Qiao et al. have presented results of silencing of the Apoe gene (99). Inhibition of its expression causes as much as 90% decrease in infection by HBV virus in liver cells. It is speculated that Apoe can play a role in HBV's persistent infection by avoiding the host's immune response. On the other hand, the study by Kivela et al. has shown that high levels of lipoproteins reduce transduction by adenoviruses (100). Furthermore, Lefevre et al. have shown the relationship between Apoe and the HSPG receptor, which promotes infection by the HCV vector (101). Viral vectors use, among other mechanisms, endocytosis for cell transduction and proteins, such as clarines, caveolae, dynamine, and Rac, play a significant role (95).

The relationship between lipid related genes, the proteins involved in effective transduction and receptors for rAAV are presented in Figure 10.

Long et al. have suggested that the increase in the multiplication factor of the Abca 1 gene (Figure 4, Table I) on the cell membrane increases infection by rAAV vectors (102). This is because this gene together with Apoe regulates cholesterol levels, which can enable the survival of the rAAV vector in cells. They can probably use cholesterol as the main component of survival. We noted that the Abca1 protein is associated with proteins that are responsible for the internalization of the rAAV virus in the cell (Figure 10B). This may suggest that the transduction of B16-F10 cells with the use rAAV/DJ vector results in an increase in the expression of the Abca1 gene (Figure 4, Table I), which activates the proteins responsible for increasing efficiency by the aforementioned vector. On the other hand, we see an increase in the multiplication factor of the Slc27a1 gene in transduced cells (Figure 4), which is not directly related to the proteins responsible for the efficient transduction by rAAV (Figure 10A). However, it is responsible for the increase in proteins transporting fatty acids, which can also be considered a factor that increases the transduction efficiency e.g. upon the administration of a next dose. The studies of Arnold et al. and Aqil et al., which showed an increase in the expression of this gene after a chickenpox infection and HIV, respectively, support the validity of our claim (103, 104).

The relationship between ABC transporters, proteins involved in effective transduction, and receptors for rAAV is presented in Figure 11.

Based on the analysis of the expression of ABC transporter genes, as demonstrated in Figure 11, there is no relationship between the expression of the genes of ABC transporters, B16-F10 cell receptors for rAAV vectors or for intracellular proteins promoting efficient transduction.

Figure 8.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 8.

GFP-expression in metastatic melanoma cells to the lungs after intranasal and intraperitoneal rAAV delivery. Arrows indicate GFP expression, which confirm rAAV transduction.

Several in vivo tests were conducted as part of this study. The results are presented in Figures 6, 7, and 8. Different routes of administration of viral vectors to estimate the most favorable marking of B16-F10 cells by a vector encoding green fluorescence protein were used in the tests. Figure 7A, 7C and 8 show that higher transduction efficiency of B16-F10/lungs by rAAV-GFP vectors is observed after intranasal administration (approx. 1.33×104 gc/50 ng/DNA total/sample DNA) compared to intraperitoneal administration (5.49×103 gc/50 ng/DNA total/sample). To understand the obtained results, one can refer to the specific anatomy of the respiratory system. Thanks to the highly vascularized nasal cavity, it is possible to quickly and directly introduce drugs, as well as gene preparations into the lungs (42, 94).

In addition, intranasal administration directs the preparation directly to the bronchial tree without the first pass effect and the possible potential loss of genome copies of rAAV vectors in the body (42-49). Our study indicated that transduction efficiency is influenced by the vector, promoter and route of administration as has also been shown by Belur et al. (64) who have demonstrated that the CAG promoter is more effective (64). The expression of CAG promoter in the lungs lasted up to 12 months while that of CMV expression up to 8 months. However, the CMV promoter has an immediate effect that provides strong but short-term expression (90, 91). However, it is very susceptible to silencing in some cell types (89). The effectiveness of the CAG promoter is shown in Figure 3, 7, and 8. The Kurosaki et al. studies support the effectiveness of the CAG promoter in respiratory cells (91). In their studies, the AAV6 vector with the aforementioned promoter was constructed, which effectively infected cells of the respiratory system. A slightly inconsistent transduction may be recorded after intranasal administration in case of animals because some rAAV vectors can stay in the upper respiratory tract and some of them get into the digestive system (Figure 7D). For this reason, we can determine a lower number of copies than the output number (as shown on Figure 7A); we administered 1010 genome copies of rAAV and detected about 104 copies.

Figure 9.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 9.

The relationship between lipid regulated genes and proteins present in the cell. Scheme made on the basis of the STRING program. Network nodes represent proteins: splice isoforms or post-translational modifications are collapsed, i.e. each node represents all the proteins produced by a single, protein-coding gene locus. Node color: colored nodes: query proteins and first shell of interactors. White nodes: second shell of interactions. Empty nodes: proteins of unknown 3D structure. Filed nodes: some 3D structure is known or predicted. Edges represent protein-protein associations: associations are meant to be specific and meaningful, i.e. proteins jointly contribute to a shared function; this does not necessarily mean they are physically binding each other. Known interactions: blue: from curated databases, pink: experimentally determined. Predicted interactions: green: gene neighborhood; red: gene fusions; dark blue: gene co-occurrence. Others: yellow: textmining; black: co-expression; violet: protein homology.

As a result, this may cause a decrease in the expression of the GFP protein in the lower respiratory tract (Figures 7, 8) as has also been shown in similar studies by Kurosaki et al. (91). A significant factor influencing transduction efficiency after e.g. intranasal administration, as has been mentioned before, is the way of administration (Figure 2) to laboratory animals, where the vector enters in a fraction of the cells in an appropriate way. The apical part of epithelial cells of the respiratory system is rich in receptors for sialic acid, while the basal-lateral part in HSPG, therefore one can observe differences in the efficiency between rAAV/DJ serotype and rAAV/2/2 (Figure 7A, C) (91). In the case of the rAAV/DJ serotype, its capsid is rich in amino acid residues recognized by receptors in both the apical part of the cells and the basal-lateral part. Therefore, one can observe its higher efficiency after intranasal administration (Figure 7A, 8) as well as using the intraperitoneal route (Figure 7C, 8). Santry et al. have evaluated various methods of administration to the respiratory tract of laboratory mice (40). Some of the studies have also examined the route of intranasal administration. They demonstrated that after intranasal administration, the best efficiency, consistency and reproducibility in the distribution of the vector in the lungs was recorded. Depending on the goal of transduction and the preferred target location, one should choose the right method of gene administration. Choosing the right method will make it possible to increase the transduction efficiency and achieve consistent results. As Santry et al. have described, the intranasal route is the safest route of administration due to the absence of inflammatory foci and any other complications (40). The result may also be influenced by the volume-dependent distribution of the vector. The distribution of the vector in the lungs depends on the volume of the substance delivered to the nasal cavity after intranasal administration. The study by Santry et al. has shown that the position in which animals are kept during administration is also of importance (40). In our experiment, as Figure 2 shows, the preparation was administered in a volume of 30 μl while the mouse was held in a vertical position. If mice are held in an inappropriate way during administration, the delivery of the vector to the lungs may be ineffective. When comparing Figure 7E and G, one can notice a higher transduction efficiency of rAAV/DJ vector after intratumoral administration (approx. 1.13×104 gc/50 ng DNA/sample) compared to intravenous administration (approx. 1×103 gc/50 ng DNA/sample). Local (topical) high concentration of vector explains the high transduction of melanoma cells. The rAAV/DJ vector tropism towards mouse melanoma cells was also confirmed in our in vitro studies (Figure 3). The presence of antibodies neutralizing rAAV serotype 2, which automatically decreases its transduction performance, could be another reason for the fact that the rAAV/DJ vector is more effective in infecting B16-F10 cells in in vivo conditions than the rAAV2/2 vector (93, 105). The use of hybrid vectors is becoming increasingly important due to their unique characteristics such as the lack of immune system reaction since they possess the ability to avoid neutralizing antibodies thanks to the construction of their capsid. For instance, van Lieshout et al. have demonstrated that the triple mutant capsid of the rAAV6 vector, containing mutations F129L, Y445F and Y731F is ideal as a candidate for gene therapy of the the lungs (106).

In conclusion, our research showed high tropism of the rAAV/DJ vector for mouse melanoma cells both in vitro and in vivo. The highest efficacy of infection after intranasal administration was observed towards melanoma metastasizing to the lungs (Figures 7A, C and 8). Therefore, this research provides evidence for effective administration of rAAV vectors to metastatic melanoma cells. Thus, gene therapy and rAAV vectors can be a new and effective therapeutic strategy for melanoma and its lung metastases.

Figure 10.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 10.

The relationship of proteins between lipid regulated genes and surface receptors of cells for rAAV vectors (10A) and the relationship of proteins involved in intracellular transport of rAAV (10B). Scheme is made on the basis of STRING program (https://string-db.org/). Network nodes represent proteins: splice isoforms or post-translational modifications are collapsed, i.e. each node represents all the proteins produced by a single, protein-coding gene locus. Node color: colored nodes: query proteins and first shell of interactors. White nodes: second shell of interactions. Empty nodes: proteins of unknown 3D structure. Filed nodes: some 3D structure is known or predicted. Edges represent protein-protein associations: associations are meant to be specific and meaningful, i.e. proteins jointly contribute to a shared function; this does not necessarily mean they are physically binding each other. Known interactions: blue: from curated databases, pink: experimentally determined. Predicted interactions: green: gene neighborhood, red: gene fusions, dark blue: gene co-occurrence. Others: yellow: textmining, black: co-expression, violet: protein homology.

Figure 11.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 11.

The relationship of proteins between ABC transporters and surface receptors of cells for rAAV (11A) and the relationship of proteins which are involved in the intracellular transport of rAAV (11B). Scheme is made on the basis of the STRING program. Network nodes represent proteins: splice isoforms or post-translational modifications are collapsed, i.e. each node represents all the proteins produced by a single, protein-coding gene locus. Node color: colored nodes: query proteins and first shell of interactors. White nodes: second shell of interactions. Empty nodes: proteins of unknown 3D structure. Filed nodes: some 3D structure is known or predicted. Edges represent protein-protein associations: associations are meant to be specific and meaningful, i.e. proteins jointly contribute to a shared function; this does not necessarily mean they are physically binding each other. Known interactions: blue: from curated databases, pink: experimentally determined. Predicted interactions: green: gene neighborhood, red: gene fusions, dark blue: gene co-occurrence. Others: yellow: textmining, black: co-expression, violet: protein homology.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a grant from The National Centre for Research and Development (Strategmed/233264/4/NCBR/2014, MentorEYE).

Footnotes

  • Authors' Contributions

    M.M. conceived the presented idea and planned the experiments. Both M.C. and M.M. contributed to the final version of the manuscript. M.C. carried out all the experiments. M.C. developed the theoretical formalism, performed the calculations, analysed the data and wrote the paper. A.Z. revised the methods and qPCR results. M.G. helped carry out the immunochemical analysis. M. B-Z. helped in the supervision.

  • This article is freely accessible online.

  • Conflicts of Interest

    The Authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose in relation to this study.

  • Received May 4, 2020.
  • Revision received June 12, 2020.
  • Accepted June 24, 2020.
  • Copyright© 2020, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved

References

  1. ↵
    1. Leonardi GC,
    2. Falzone L,
    3. Salemi R,
    4. Zanghi A,
    5. Spandidos DA,
    6. Mccubrey JA,
    7. Candido S,
    8. Libra M
    : Cutaneous melanoma: From pathogenesis to therapy (Review). Int J Oncol 52: 1071-1080, 2018. PMID: 29532857. DOI: 10.3892/ijo.2018.4287
    OpenUrl
  2. ↵
    1. Domingues B,
    2. Lopes JM,
    3. Soares P,
    4. Populo H
    : Melanoma treatment in review. Immunotargets Ther 7: 35-39, 2018. PMID: 29922629. DOI: 10.2147/ITT.S134842
    OpenUrl
  3. ↵
    1. Nunes TWN,
    2. Filippi-Chiela EC,
    3. Callegari-Jacques SM,
    4. da Silva VD,
    5. Sansonowicz T,
    6. Lenz G,
    7. Roehe AV
    : Nuclear morphometric analysis in tissue as an objective tool with potential use to improve melanoma staging. Melanoma Res 29: 474-482, 2019. PMID: 30839356. DOI: 10.1097/CMR.00000000 00000594
    OpenUrl
  4. ↵
    1. Hodi FS,
    2. O'Day SJ,
    3. McDermott DF,
    4. Weber RW,
    5. Sosman JA,
    6. Haanen JB,
    7. Gonzalez R,
    8. Robert C,
    9. Schadendorf D,
    10. Hassel JC,
    11. Akerley W,
    12. van den Eertwegh AJ,
    13. Lutzky J,
    14. Lorigan P,
    15. Vaubel JM,
    16. Linette GP,
    17. Hogg D,
    18. Ottensmeier CH,
    19. Lebbé C,
    20. Peschel C,
    21. Quirt I,
    22. Clark JI,
    23. Wolchok JD,
    24. Weber JS,
    25. Tian J,
    26. Yellin MJ,
    27. Nichol GM,
    28. Hoos A,
    29. Urba WJ
    : Improved survival with ipilimumab in patients with metastatic melanoma. N Engl J Med 363: 711-723, 2010. PMID: 20525992. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1003466
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Kianmehr Z,
    2. Khorsandi K,
    3. Mohammadi,
    4. Hosseinzadeh R
    : Low-level laser irradiation potentiates anticancer activity of p-coumaric acid against human malignant melanoma cells. Melanoma Res 30: 136-146, 2020. PMID: 30855528. DOI: 10.1097/CMR.0000000000000603
    OpenUrl
  6. ↵
    1. Wilson MA,
    2. Zhong J,
    3. Rosenbaum BE,
    4. Utter K,
    5. Moran U,
    6. Darvishian F,
    7. Polsky D,
    8. Berman RS,
    9. Shapiro RL,
    10. Pavlick AC,
    11. Osman I
    : Impact of initial stage on metastatic melanoma survival. Melanoma Res 29: 281-288, 2019. PMID: 31026246. DOI: 10.1097/CMR.0000000000000526
    OpenUrl
  7. ↵
    1. Lee JH,
    2. Kim Y,
    3. Yoon YE,
    4. Kim YJ,
    5. Oh SG,
    6. Jang JH,
    7. Kim E
    : Development of efficient adeno-associated virus (AAV)-mediated gene delivery system with a phytoactive material for targeting human melanoma cells. N Biotechnol 37(Pt B): 194-199, 2017. PMID: 28179151. DOI: 10.1016/j.nbt.2017.02.001
    OpenUrl
    1. Ghazawi FM,
    2. Darwich R,
    3. Le M,
    4. Rahme E,
    5. Zubarev A,
    6. Moreau L,
    7. Burnier JV,
    8. Sasseville D,
    9. Burnier MN,
    10. Litvinov IV
    : Uveal melanoma incidence trends in Canada: a national comprehensive population-based study. Br J Ophthamol 103: 1872-1876, 2019. PMID: 30819691. DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2018-312966
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Donley GM,
    2. Liu WT,
    3. Pfeiffer RM,
    4. McDonald EC,
    5. Peters KO,
    6. Tucker MA,
    7. Cahoon EK
    : Reproductive factors, exogenous hormone use and incidence of melanoma among women in the United States. Br J Cancer 120: 754-760, 2019. PMID: 30814688. DOI: 10.1038/s41416-019-0411-z
    OpenUrl
  9. ↵
    1. Flotte TR
    : Gene Therapy Progress and Prospects: Recombinant adeno-associated virus (rAAV) vectors. Gene Ther 11: 805-810, 2004. PMID: 15042119. DOI: 10.1038/sj.gt.3302233
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Wan X,
    2. Pei H,
    3. Zhao MJ,
    4. Yang S,
    5. Hu WK,
    6. He H,
    7. Ma SQ,
    8. Zhang G,
    9. Dong XY,
    10. Chen C,
    11. Wang DW,
    12. Li B
    : Efficacy and safety of rAAV2-ND4 treatment for leber's hereditary optic neuropathy. Sci Rep 6: 21587, 2016. PMID: 26892229. DOI: 10.1038/srep21587
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Corti M,
    2. Liberati C,
    3. Smith BK,
    4. Lawson LA,
    5. Tuna IS,
    6. Conlon TJ,
    7. Coleman KE,
    8. Islam S,
    9. Herzog RW,
    10. Fuller DD,
    11. Collins SW,
    12. Byrne BJ
    : Safety of intradiaphragmatic delivery of adeno-associated virus-mediated alpha-glucosidase (rAAV1-CMV-hGAA) gene therapy in children affected by pompe disease. Hum Gene Ther Clin Dev 28: 208-218, 2017. PMID: 29160099. DOI: 10.1089/humc.2017.146
    OpenUrl
  12. ↵
    1. European Medicines Agency
    . Science Medicines Healthy. Available at: www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/overview/glybera-epar-summary-public_en.pdfah [Last accessed June 12, 2020]
  13. ↵
    1. European Medicines Agency
    . Science Medicines Healthy. Available at: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/medicines/human/EPAR/luxturna [Last accessed June 12, 2020]
  14. ↵
    1. Hashimoto H,
    2. Mizushima T,
    3. Chijiwa T,
    4. Nakamura M,
    5. Suemizu H
    : Efficient production of recombinant adeno-associated viral vector, serotype DJ/8, carrying the GFP gene. Virus Res 238: 63-68, 2017. PMID: 28571759. DOI: 10.1016/j.virusres.2017.05.017
    OpenUrl
  15. ↵
    1. Smith JK,
    2. Agbandje-McKenna M
    : Creating an arsenal of Adeno-associated virus (AAV) gene delivery stealth vehicles. PLoS Pathog 14(5): e1006929, 2018. PMID: 29723270. DOI: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1006929
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  16. ↵
    1. Hess GT,
    2. Tycko J,
    3. Yao D,
    4. Bassik MC
    : Methods and applications of CRISPR-mediated base editing in eukaryotic genomes. Mol Cell 68: 26-43, 2017. PMID: 28985508. DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2017.09.029
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Liu XS,
    2. Wu H,
    3. Krzisch M,
    4. Wu X,
    5. Graef J,
    6. Muffat J,
    7. Hnisz D,
    8. Li CH,
    9. Yuan B,
    10. Xu C,
    11. Li Y,
    12. Vershkov D,
    13. Cacace A,
    14. Young RA,
    15. Jaenisch R
    : Rescue of fragile X syndrome neurons by DNA methylation editing of the FMR1 gene. Cell 172(5): 979-992.e6, 2018. PMID: 29456084. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.01.012
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Zimmermann M,
    2. Murina O,
    3. Reijns MAM,
    4. Agathanggelou A,
    5. Challis R,
    6. Tarnauskaitė Ž,
    7. Muir M,
    8. Fluteau A,
    9. Aregger M,
    10. McEwan A,
    11. Yuan W,
    12. Clarke M,
    13. Lambros MB,
    14. Paneesha S,
    15. Moss P,
    16. Chandrashekhar M,
    17. Angers S,
    18. Moffat J,
    19. Brunton VG,
    20. Hart T,
    21. de Bono J,
    22. Stankovic T,
    23. Jackson AP,
    24. Durocher D
    : CRISPR screens identify genomic ribonucleotides as a source of PARP-trapping lesions. Nature 559(7713): 285-289, 2018. PMID: 29973717. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-018-0291-z
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  19. ↵
    1. Sachdeva M,
    2. Sachdeva N,
    3. Pal M,
    4. Gupta N,
    5. Khan IA,
    6. Majumdar M,
    7. Tiwari A
    : CRISPR/Cas9: molecular tool for gene therapy to target genome and epigenome in the treatment of lung cancer. Cancer Gene Ther 22: 509-517, 2015. PMID: 26494554. DOI: 10.1038/cgt.2015.54
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Platt RJ,
    2. Chen S,
    3. Zhou Y,
    4. Yim MJ,
    5. Swiech L,
    6. Kempton HR,
    7. Dahlman JE,
    8. Parnas O,
    9. Eisenhaure TM,
    10. Jovanovic M,
    11. Graham DB,
    12. Jhunjhunwala S,
    13. Heidenreich M,
    14. Xavier RJ,
    15. Langer R,
    16. Anderson DG,
    17. Hacohen N,
    18. Regev A,
    19. Feng G,
    20. Sharp PA,
    21. Zhang F
    : CRISPR-Cas9 knockin mice for genome editing and cancer modeling. Cell 159: 440-455, 2014. PMID: 25263330. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.09.014
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Ding Q,
    2. Strong A,
    3. Pate KM,
    4. Ng SL,
    5. Gosis BS,
    6. Regan SN,
    7. Cowan CA,
    8. Rader DJ,
    9. Musunuru K
    : Permanent alteration of PCSK9 with in vivo CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing. Circ Res 115: 488-492, 2014. PMID: 24916110. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCRES AHA.115.304351
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    1. Rossidis AC,
    2. Stratigis JD,
    3. Chadwick AC,
    4. Hartman HA,
    5. Ahn NJ,
    6. Li H,
    7. Singh K,
    8. Coons BE,
    9. Li L,
    10. Lv W,
    11. Zoltick PW,
    12. Alapati D,
    13. Zacharias W,
    14. Jain R,
    15. Morrisey EE,
    16. Musunuru K,
    17. Peranteau WH
    : In utero CRISPR-mediated therapeutic editing of metabolic genes. Nat Med 24(10): 1513-1518, 2018. PMID: 30297903. DOI: 10.1038/s41591-018-0184-6
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  23. ↵
    1. Ou Z,
    2. Niu X,
    3. He W,
    4. Chen Y,
    5. Song B,
    6. Xian Y,
    7. Fan D,
    8. Tang D,
    9. Sun X
    : The combination of CRISPR/Cas9 and iPSC technologies in the gene therapy of human beta-thalassemia in mice. Sci Rep 6: 32463, 2016. PMID: 27581487. DOI: 10.1038/srep32463
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Long C,
    2. Amoasii L,
    3. Mireault AA,
    4. McAnally JR,
    5. Li H,
    6. Sanchez-Ortiz E,
    7. Bhattacharyya S,
    8. Shelton JM,
    9. Bassel-Duby R,
    10. Olson EN
    : Postnatal genome editing partially restores dystrophin expression in a mouse model of muscular dystrophy. Science 351(6271): 400-403, 2016. PMID: 26721683. DOI: 10.1126/science.aad5725
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Nelson CE,
    2. Hakim CH,
    3. Ousterout DG,
    4. Thakore PI,
    5. Moreb EA,
    6. Castellanos Rivera RM,
    7. Madhavan S,
    8. Pan X,
    9. Ran FA,
    10. Yan WX,
    11. Asokan A,
    12. Zhang F,
    13. Duan D,
    14. Gersbach CA
    : In vivo genome editing improves muscle function in a mouse model of Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Science 351(6271): 403-407, 2016. PMID: 26721684. DOI: 10.1126/science.aad5143
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    1. Tabebordbar M,
    2. Zhu K,
    3. Cheng JKW,
    4. Chew WL,
    5. Widrick JJ,
    6. Yan WX,
    7. Maesner C,
    8. Wu EY,
    9. Xiao R,
    10. Ran FA,
    11. Cong L,
    12. Zhang F,
    13. Vandenberghe LH,
    14. Church GM,
    15. Wagers AJ
    : In vivo gene editing in dystrophic mouse muscle and muscle stem cells. Science 351(6271): 407-411, 2016. PMID: 26721686. DOI: 10.1126/science.aad5177
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    1. Ma H,
    2. Marti-Gutierrez N,
    3. Park SW,
    4. Wu J,
    5. Lee Y,
    6. Suzuki K,
    7. Koski A,
    8. Ji D,
    9. Hayama T,
    10. Ahmed R,
    11. Darby H,
    12. Van Dyken C,
    13. Li Y,
    14. Kang E,
    15. Park AR,
    16. Kim D,
    17. Kim ST,
    18. Gong J,
    19. Gu Y,
    20. Xu X,
    21. Battaglia D,
    22. Krieg SA,
    23. Lee DM,
    24. Wu DH,
    25. Wolf DP,
    26. Heitner SB,
    27. Belmonte JCI,
    28. Amato P,
    29. Kim JS,
    30. Kaul S,
    31. Mitalipov S
    : Correction of a pathogenic gene mutation in human embryos. Nature 548(7668): 413-441, 2017. PMID: 28783728. DOI: 10.1038/nature23305
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Kim K,
    2. Ryu SM,
    3. Kim ST,
    4. Baek G,
    5. Kim D,
    6. Lim K,
    7. Chung E,
    8. Kim S,
    9. Kim JS
    : Highly efficient RNA-guided base editing in mouse embryos. Nat Biotechnol 35(5): 435-437, 2017. PMID: 28244995. DOI: 10.1038/nbt.3816
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Yu W,
    2. Mookherjee S,
    3. Chaitankar V,
    4. Hiriyanna S,
    5. Kim JW,
    6. Brooks M,
    7. Ataeijannati Y,
    8. Sun X,
    9. Dong L,
    10. Li T,
    11. Swaroop A,
    12. Wu Z
    : Nrl knockdown by AAV-delivered CRISPR/Cas9 prevents retinal degeneration in mice. Nat Commun 8: 14716, 2017. PMID: 28291770. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms14716
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Amoasii L,
    2. Hildyard JCW,
    3. Li H,
    4. Sanchez-Ortiz E,
    5. Mireault A,
    6. Caballero D,
    7. Harron R,
    8. Stathopoulou TR,
    9. Massey C,
    10. Shelton JM,
    11. Bassel-Duby R,
    12. Piercy RJ,
    13. Olson EN
    : Gene editing restores dystrophin expression in a canine model of Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Science 362(6410): 86-91, 2018. PMID: 30166439. DOI: 10.1126/science.aau1549
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. ↵
    1. Villiger L,
    2. Grisch-Chan HM,
    3. Lindsay H,
    4. Ringnalda F,
    5. Pogliano CB,
    6. Allegri G,
    7. Fingerhut R,
    8. Häberle J,
    9. Matos J,
    10. Robinson MD,
    11. Thöny B,
    12. Schwank G
    : Treatment of a metabolic liver disease by in vivo genome base editing in adult mice. Nat Med 24(10): 1519-1525, 2018. PMID: 30297904. DOI: 10.1038/s41591-018-0209-1
    OpenUrl
  30. ↵
    1. Choi VW,
    2. McCarty DM,
    3. Samulski RJ
    : AAV hybrid serotypes: improved vectors for gene delivery. Curr Gene Ther 5(3): 299-310, 2005. PMID: 15975007. DOI: 10.2174/1566523054064968
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Grimm D,
    2. Lee JS,
    3. Wang L,
    4. Desai T,
    5. Akache B,
    6. Storm TA,
    7. Kay MA
    : In vitro and in vivo gene therapy vector evolution via multispecies interbreeding and retargeting of adeno-associated viruses. J Virol 82(12): 5887-5911, 2008. PMID: 18400866. DOI: 10.1128/JVI.00254-08
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Katada Y,
    2. Kobayashi K,
    3. Tsubota K,
    4. Kurihara T
    : Evaluation of AAV-DJ vector for retinal gene therapy. PeerJ 7: e6317, 2019. PMID: 30671314. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.6317
    OpenUrl
  32. ↵
    1. Mao Y,
    2. Wang X,
    3. Yan R,
    4. Hu W,
    5. Li A,
    6. Wang S,
    7. Li H
    : Single point mutation in adeno-associated viral vectors -DJ capsid leads to improvement for gene delivery in vivo. BMC Biotechnol 16: 1, 2016. PMID: 26729248. DOI: 10.1186/s12896-015-0230-0
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    1. Santiago-Ortiz JL,
    2. David V,
    3. Schaffer DV
    : Adeno-associated virus (AAV) vectors in cancer gene therapy. J Control Release 240: 287-301, 2016. PMID: 26796040. DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel. 2016.01.001
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  34. ↵
    1. Bienkowska A,
    2. Kuzmicka W,
    3. Ciepiela O,
    4. Ochocki J,
    5. Malecki M
    : Increased temperature facilitates adeno-associated virus vector transduction of colorectal cancer cell lines in a manner dependent on heat shock protein signature. Biomed Res Int 8: 2020,9107140, 2020. PMID: 32090115. DOI: 10.1155/2020/9107140
    OpenUrl
  35. ↵
    1. Podolska K,
    2. Stachurska A,
    3. Hajdukiewicz K,
    4. Malecki M
    . Gene therapy prospects – intranasal delivery of therapeutic genes. Adv Clin Exp Med 21(4): 525-34, 2012. PMID: 23240459.
    OpenUrl
  36. ↵
    1. Santry LA,
    2. Ingrao JC,
    3. Yu DL,
    4. de Jong JG,
    5. van Lieshout LP,
    6. Wood GA,
    7. Wootton SK
    : AAV vector distribution in the mouse respiratory tract following four different methods of administration. BMC Biotechnol 17(1): 43, 2017. PMID: 28506256. DOI: 10.1186/s12896-017-0365-2
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  37. ↵
    1. Nass SA,
    2. Mattingly MA,
    3. Woodcock DA,
    4. Burnham BL,
    5. Ardinger JA,
    6. Osmond SE,
    7. Frederick AM,
    8. Scaria A,
    9. Cheng SH,
    10. O'Riordan CR
    : Universal method for the purification of recombinant AAV vectors of differing serotypes. Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev 9: 33-46, 2017. PMID: 29349097. DOI: 10.1016/j.omtm.2017.12.004
    OpenUrl
  38. ↵
    1. Uytingco CR,
    2. Martens JR
    : Intranasal delivery of adenoviral and AAV vectors for transduction of the mammalian peripheral olfactory system. Methods Mol Biol 1950: 283-297, 2019. PMID: 30783981. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-9139-6_17
    OpenUrl
  39. ↵
    1. Marchenko I,
    2. Borodina T,
    3. Trushina D,
    4. Rassokhina I,
    5. Volkova Y,
    6. Shirinian V,
    7. Zavarzin I,
    8. Gogin A,
    9. Bukreeva T
    : Mesoporous particle-based microcontainers for intranasal delivery of imidazopyridine drugs. J Microencapsul 35(7-8): 657-666, 2018. PMID: 30669903. DOI: 10.1080/02652048.2019.1571642
    OpenUrl
    1. Wingrove J,
    2. Swedrowska M,
    3. Scherließ R,
    4. Parry M,
    5. Ramjeeawon M,
    6. Taylor D,
    7. Gauthier G,
    8. Brown L,
    9. Amiel S,
    10. Zelaya F,
    11. Forbes B
    : Characterisation of nasal devices for delivery of insulin to the brain and evaluation in humans using functional magnetic resonance imaging. J Control Release 302: 140-114, 2019. PMID: 30953665. DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2019.03.032
    OpenUrl
  40. ↵
    1. Costa C,
    2. Moreira JN,
    3. Amaral MH,
    4. Sousa Lobo JM,
    5. Silva AC
    : Nose-to-brain delivery of lipid-based nanosystems for epileptic seizures and anxiety crisis. J Control Release 295: 187-200, 2019. PMID: 30610952. DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2018.12.049
    OpenUrl
  41. ↵
    1. Mastrandrea LD,
    2. Quattrin T
    : Clinical evaluation of inhaled insulin. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 58(9-10): 1061-1075, 2006. PMID: 17070613. DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2006.07.019
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Guntur VP,
    2. Dhand R
    : Inhaled insulin: extending the horizons of inhalation therapy. Respir Care 52(7): 911-922, 2007. PMID: 17594734.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Codrons V,
    2. Vanderbist F,
    3. Verbeeck RK
    : Systemic delivery of parathyroid hormone (1-34) using inhalation dry powders in rats. J Pharm Sci 92(5): 938-50, 2003. PMID: 12712413. DOI: 10.1002/jps.10346
    OpenUrlPubMed
  42. ↵
    1. Gessler T,
    2. Seeger W,
    3. Schmehl T
    : Inhaled prostanoids in the therapy of pulmonaryhypertension. J Aerosol Med 21(1): 1-12, 2008. PMID: 18518827. DOI: 10.1089/jamp.2007.0657
    OpenUrl
  43. ↵
    1. Mikhail N
    : Place of technosphere inhaled insulin in treatment of diabetes. World J Diabetes 7(20): 599-604, 2016. PMID: 28031777. DOI: 10.4239/wjd.v7.i20.599
    OpenUrl
  44. ↵
    1. Ahmad Z,
    2. Sharma S,
    3. Khuller GK
    : Inhaleable alginate nanoparticles as antitubercular drug carriers against experimental tuberculosis. Int J Antimicrob Agents 26(4): 298-303, 2005. PMID: 16154726. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2005.07.012
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Justo OR,
    2. Moraes AM
    : Kanamycin incorporation in lipid vesicles prepared by ethanol injection designed for tuberculosis treatment. Pharm Pharmacol 57(1): 23-30, 2005. PMID: 15638989. DOI: 10.1211/0022357055092
    OpenUrl
    1. Garcia-Contreras L,
    2. Marcol T,
    3. Bell SJD,
    4. Hickey AJ
    : Evaluation of novel particles as pulmonary delivery systems for insulin in rats. AAPS Pharm Sci 5(2): 9, 2003. PMID: 12866936. DOI: 10.1208/ps050209
    OpenUrl
    1. Davies NM,
    2. Feddah MR
    : A novel method for assessing dissolution of aerosol inhaler products. Int J Pharm 255: 175-187, 2003. PMID: 12672613. DOI: 10.1016/s0378-5173(03)00091-7
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. ↵
    1. Djupesland PG
    : Nasal drug delivery devices: characteristics and performance in a clinical perspective – a review. Drug Deliv Transl Res 3(1): 42-62, 2013. PMID: 23316447. DOI: 10.1007/s13346-012-0108-9
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. ↵
    1. Johansson J,
    2. Hirvonen J,
    3. Lovró Z,
    4. Ekblad L,
    5. Kaasinen V,
    6. Rajasilta O,
    7. Helin S,
    8. Tuisku J,
    9. Sirén S,
    10. Pennanen M,
    11. Agrawal A,
    12. Crystal R,
    13. Vainio PJ,
    14. Alho H,
    15. Scheinin M
    : Intranasal naloxone rapidly occupies brain mu-opioid receptors in human subjects. Neuropsychopharmacology 44(9): 1667-1673, 2019. PMID: 30867551. DOI: 10.1038/s41386-019-0368-x
    OpenUrl
    1. Santiago JCP,
    2. Hallschmid M
    : Outcomes and clinical implications of intranasal insulin administration to the central nervous system. Exp Neurol 317: 180-190, 2019. PMID: 30885653. DOI: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2019.03.007
    OpenUrl
  47. ↵
    1. Mustapic M,
    2. Tran J,
    3. Craft S,
    4. Kapogiannis D
    : Extracellular vesicle biomarkers track cognitive changes following intranasal insulin in Alzheimer's disease. J Alzheimers Dis 69(2): 489-498, 2019. PMID: 30958348. DOI: 10.3233/JAD-180578
    OpenUrl
  48. ↵
    1. Tao Y,
    2. Li C,
    3. Yao A,
    4. Qu Y,
    5. Qin L,
    6. Xiong Z,
    7. Zhang J,
    8. Wang W
    : Intranasal administration of erythropoietin rescues the photoreceptors in degenerative retina: a noninvasive method to deliver drugs to the eye. Drug Deliv 26(1): 78-88, 2019. PMID: 30744451. DOI: 10.1080/10717544.2018.1556361
    OpenUrl
  49. ↵
    1. Vandenbussche N,
    2. Goadsby PJ
    : The discovery and development of inhaled therapeutics for migraine. Expert Opin Drug Discov 14(6): 591-599, 2019. PMID: 30924698. DOI: 10.1080/17460441.2019.1598373
    OpenUrl
  50. ↵
    1. Musumeci T,
    2. Bonaccorso A,
    3. Puglisi G
    : Epilepsy disease and nose-to-brain delivery of polymeric nanoparticles: an overview. Pharmaceutics 11(3): pii: E118, 2019. PMID: 30871237. DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics11030118
  51. ↵
    1. Ma X-c,
    2. Liu P,
    3. Zhang X-l,
    4. Jiang WH,
    5. Jia M,
    6. Wang CX,
    7. Dong YY,
    8. Dang YH,
    9. Gao CG
    : Intranasal delivery of recombinant AAV containing BDNF fused with ha2tat: a potential promising therapy strategy for major depressive disorder. Sci Rep 6: 22404, 2016. PMID: 26935651. DOI: 10.1038/srep22404
    OpenUrl
  52. ↵
    1. Jiao J,
    2. Zhang L
    : Influence of intranasal drugs on human nasal mucociliary clearance and ciliary beat frequency. Allergy Asthma Immunol Res 11(3): 306-319, 2019. PMID: 30912321. DOI: 10.4168/aair.2019.11.3.306
    OpenUrl
  53. ↵
    1. Belur LR,
    2. Temme A,
    3. Podetz-Pedersen KM,
    4. Riedl M,
    5. Vulchanova L,
    6. Robinson N,
    7. Hanson LR,
    8. Kozarsky KF,
    9. Orchard PJ,
    10. Frey WH 2nd.,
    11. Low WC,
    12. McIvor RS
    : Intranasal adeno-associated virus mediated gene delivery and expression of human iduronidase in the central nervous system: A noninvasive and effective approach for prevention of neurologic disease in mucopolysaccharidosis type I. Hum Gene Ther 28(7): 576-587, 2017. PMID: 28462595. DOI: 10.1089/hum.2017.187
    OpenUrl
  54. ↵
    1. Werling NJ,
    2. Satkunanathan S,
    3. Thorpe R,
    4. Zhao Y
    : Systematic comparison and validation of quantitative real-time PCR methods for the quantitation of adeno-associated viral products. Hum Gene Ther Method 26(3): 82-92, 2015. PMID: 25953194. DOI: 10.1089/hgtb.2015.013
    OpenUrl
  55. ↵
    1. Schindelin J,
    2. Arganda-Carreras I,
    3. Frise E,
    4. Kaynig V,
    5. Longair M,
    6. Pietzsch T,
    7. Preibisch S,
    8. Rueden C,
    9. Saalfeld S,
    10. Schmid B,
    11. Tinevez JY,
    12. White DJ,
    13. Hartenstein V,
    14. Eliceiri K,
    15. Tomancak P,
    16. Cardona A
    : Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Methods 9(7): 676-682, 2012. PMID: 22743772. DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.2019
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  56. ↵
    1. Ward WH,
    2. Farma JM
    1. Matthews NH,
    2. Li WQ,
    3. Qureshi,
    4. Martin A
    . Weinstock and Eunyoung Cho: Chapter 1. Epidemiology of melanoma. cutaneous melanoma: etiology and therapy. Ward WH, Farma JM (eds.). Brisbane (AU): Codon Publications Pages pp. 3-22, 2017. PMID: 29461771. DOI: 10.15586/codon.cutaneousmelanoma.2017
  57. ↵
    1. Velu PP,
    2. Cao Ch,
    3. Yan TD
    : Current surgical management of melanoma metastases to the lung. J Thorac Dis (Suppl 3): S274-S276, 2013. PMID: 24040536. DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2013.08.42
  58. ↵
    1. Paolino G,
    2. Bottoni U,
    3. Clerico R,
    4. Didona D,
    5. Venuta F,
    6. Corsett P,
    7. Ambrifi M,
    8. Cantisani C,
    9. Richetta GA,
    10. Lopez T,
    11. Calvieri S
    : Clinicopathological predictive factors of melanoma lung metastases. J Integr Oncol 3: 119, 2014. DOI: 10.4172/2329-6771.1000119
    OpenUrl
  59. ↵
    1. Limberis MP,
    2. Vandenberghe LH,
    3. Zhang L,
    4. Pickles RJ,
    5. Wilson JM
    : Transduction efficiencies of novel RAAV vectors in mouse airway epithelium in vivo and human ciliated airway epithelium in vitro. Mol Ther 17(2): 294-301, 2009. PMID: 19066597. DOI: 10.1038/mt.2008.261
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Damjanovic D,
    2. Zhang X,
    3. Mu J,
    4. Medina MF,
    5. Xing Z
    : Organ distribution of transgene expression following intranasal mucosal delivery of recombinant replication-defective adenovirus gene transfer vector. Gen Vaccines Ther 6: 5, 2008. PMID: 18261231. DOI: 10.1186/1479-0556-6-5
    OpenUrl
  60. ↵
    1. van Lieshout LP,
    2. Domm JM,
    3. Wootton SK
    : AAV-mediated gene delivery to the lung. Methods Mol Biol 1950: 361-372, 2019. PMID: 30783985. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-9139-6_21
    OpenUrl
  61. ↵
    1. Katz MG,
    2. Fargnoli AS,
    3. Gubara SM,
    4. Fish K,
    5. Weber T,
    6. Bridges CR,
    7. Hajjar RJ,
    8. Ishikawa K
    : Targeted gene delivery through the respiratory system: rationale for intratracheal gene transfer. J Cardiovasc Dev Dis 6(1): 8, 2019. PMID: 30781363. DOI: 10.3390/jcdd6010008
    OpenUrl
  62. ↵
    The Journal of Gene Medicine Clinical Trial site. Available at: http://www.abedia.com/wiley/index.html [Last Accessed June 20, 2016]
  63. ↵
    1. Czajka M,
    2. Zajkowska A,
    3. Stachowiak N,
    4. Malecki M
    : Cancer gene therapy: The estimation of reporter genes delivery to B16-F10 melanoma cells. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venerol 31: 67, 2017.
    OpenUrl
  64. ↵
    1. Zajkowska A,
    2. Czajka M,
    3. Slyk Z,
    4. Malecki M
    : MicroRNA signature of the B16-F10 melanoma cells infected with adeno-associated viral vectors. J Stem Cell Res Ther, 2016. DOI: 10.4172/2157-7633.C1.024
  65. ↵
    1. Al-Dosari MS,
    2. Gao X
    : Nonviral gene delivery: principle, limitations, and recent progress. AAPS J 11(4): 671-681, 2009. PMID: 19834816. DOI: 10.1208/s12248-009-9143-y
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  66. ↵
    1. Tsoukalas C,
    2. Geninatti-Crich S,
    3. Gaitanis A,
    4. Tsotakos T,
    5. Paravatou-Petsotas M,
    6. Aime S,
    7. Jiménez-Juárez R,
    8. Anagnostopoulos CD,
    9. Djanashvili K,
    10. Bouziotis P
    : Tumor targeting via sialic acid: [68Ga]DOTA-en-pba as a new tool for molecular imaging of cancer with PET. Mol Imaging Biol 20(5): 798-807, 2018. PMID: 29464496. DOI: 10.1007/s11307-018-1176-0
    OpenUrl
  67. ↵
    1. Engbring JA,
    2. Hoffman MP,
    3. Karmand AJ,
    4. Kleinman HK
    : The B16F10 cell receptor for a metastasis-promoting site on laminin-1 is a heparan sulfate/chondroitin sulfate-containing proteoglycan. Cancer Res 62(12): 3549-3554, 2002. PMID: 12068003.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  68. ↵
    1. Raz A,
    2. McLellan WL,
    3. Hart IR,
    4. Bucana Cd,
    5. Hoyer LC,
    6. Sela BA,
    7. Dragsten P,
    8. Fidler IJ
    : Cell surface properties of B16 melanoma variants with differing metastatic potential. Cancer Res 40(5): 1645-1651, 1980. PMID: 7370996.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  69. ↵
    1. Metzner T,
    2. Bedeir A,
    3. Held G,
    4. Peter-Vörösmarty B,
    5. Ghassemi S,
    6. Heinzle C,
    7. Spiegl-Kreinecker S,
    8. Marian B,
    9. Holzmann K,
    10. Grasl-Kraupp B,
    11. Pirker C,
    12. Micksche M,
    13. Berger W,
    14. Heffeter P,
    15. Grusch M
    : Fibroblast growth factor receptors as therapeutic targets in human melanoma: synergism with BRAF inhibition. J Invest Dermatol 131(10): 2087-2095, 2011. PMID: 21753785. DOI: 10.1038/jid.2011.177
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  70. ↵
    1. Gitay-Goren H,
    2. Halaban R,
    3. Neufeld G
    : Human melanoma cells but not normal melanocytes express vascular endothelial growth factor receptor. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 190(3): 702-708, 1993. PMID: 8439321. DOI: 10.1006/bbrc.1993.1106
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  71. ↵
    1. Felding-Habermann B,
    2. Mueller BM,
    3. Romerdahl CA,
    4. Cheresh DA
    : Involvement of integrin alpha V gene expression in human melanoma tumorigenicity. J Clin Invest 89(6): 2018-2022, 1992. PMID: 1376331. DOI: 10.1172/JCI115811
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  72. ↵
    1. Schmidt M,
    2. Chiorini JA
    : Gangliosides are essential for bovine adeno-associated virus entry. J Virol 80(11): 5516-5522, 2006. PMID: 16699032. DOI: 10.1128/JVI.02393-05
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  73. ↵
    1. Fishman PH,
    2. Brady RO,
    3. Bradley RM,
    4. Aaronson SA,
    5. Tadaro GJ
    : Absence of a specific ganglioside galactosyltransferase in mouse cells transformed by murine sarcoma virus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 71(2): 298-301, 1974. PMID: 4360937. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.71.2.298
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  74. ↵
    1. Opie SR,
    2. Warrington KH Jr.,
    3. Agbandje-McKenna M,
    4. Zolotukhin S,
    5. Muzyczka N
    : Identification of amino acid residues in the capsid proteins of adeno-associated virus type 2 that contribute to heparan sulfate proteoglycan binding. J Virol 77(12): 6995-7006, 2003. PMID: 12768018. DOI: 10.1128/jvi.77.12.6995-7006.2003
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Weber M,
    2. Rabinowitz J,
    3. Provost N,
    4. Conrath H,
    5. Folliot S,
    6. Briot D,
    7. Chérel Y,
    8. Chenuaud P,
    9. Samulski J,
    10. Moullier P,
    11. Rolling F
    : Recombinant adeno-associated virus serotype 4 mediates unique and exclusive long-term transduction of retinal pigmented epithelium in rat, dog, and nonhuman primate after subretinal delivery. Mol Ther 7(6): 774-781, 2003. PMID: 12788651. DOI: 10.1016/s1525-0016(03)00098-4
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  75. ↵
    1. Walters RW,
    2. Yi SM,
    3. Keshavjee S,
    4. Brown KE,
    5. Welsh MJ,
    6. Chiorini JA,
    7. Zabner J
    : Binding of adeno-associated virus type 5 to 2,3-linked sialic acid is required for gene transfer. J Biol Chem 276(23): 20610-2061, 2001. PMID: 11262413. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M101559200
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  76. ↵
    1. Arbetman AE,
    2. Lochrie M,
    3. Zhou S,
    4. Wellman J,
    5. Scallan C,
    6. Doroudchi MM,
    7. Randlev V,
    8. Patarroyo-White S,
    9. Liu T,
    10. Smith P,
    11. Lehmkuhi H,
    12. Hobbs LA,
    13. Pierce GF,
    14. Colosi P
    : Novel caprine adeno-associated virus (RAAV) capsid (RAAV-Go.1) is closely related to the primate RAAV-5 and has unique tropism and neutralization properties. J Virol 79(24): 15238-15245, 2005. PMID: 16306595. DOI: 10.1128/JVI.79.24.15238-15245.2005
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  77. ↵
    1. Naso MF,
    2. Tomkowicz B,
    3. Perry WL,
    4. Strohl WR
    : Adeno-associated virus (RAAV) as a vector for gene therapy. BioDrugs 31(4): 317-334, 2017. PMID: 28669112. DOI: 10.1007/s40259-017-0234-5
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  78. ↵
    1. Kurosaki F,
    2. Uchibori R,
    3. Mato N,
    4. Sehera Y,
    5. Saga Y,
    6. Urabe M,
    7. Mizukami H,
    8. Sugiyama Y,
    9. Kume A
    : Optimization of adeno-associated virus vector-mediated gene transfer to the respiratory tract. Gene Ther 24(5): 290-297, 2017. PMID: 28346434. DOI: 10.1038/gt.2017.19
    OpenUrl
  79. ↵
    1. Damdindorj L,
    2. Karnan S,
    3. Ota A,
    4. Hossain E,
    5. Konishi Y,
    6. Hosokawa Y,
    7. Konishi H
    : A comparative analysis of constitutive promoters located in adeno-associated viral vectors. PLoS One 9(8): e106472. 32, 2014. PMID: 25170953. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0106472
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  80. ↵
    1. Gray SJ,
    2. Foti SB,
    3. Schwartz JW,
    4. Bachaboina L,
    5. Taylor-Blake T,
    6. Coleman J,
    7. Ehlers MD,
    8. Zylka MJ,
    9. McCrown TJ,
    10. Samulski RJ
    : Optimizing promoters for recombinant adeno-associated virus-mediated gene expression in the peripheral and central nervous system using self-complementary vectors. Hum Gene Ther 22(9): 1143-1153, 2011. PMID: 21476867. DOI: 10.1089/hum.2010.245
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  81. ↵
    1. Alton EW,
    2. Beekman JM,
    3. Boyd AC,
    4. Brand J,
    5. Carlon MS,
    6. Connolly MM,
    7. Chan M,
    8. Conlon S,
    9. Davidson HE,
    10. Davies JC,
    11. Davies LA,
    12. Dekkers JF,
    13. Doherty A,
    14. Gea-Sorli S,
    15. Gill DR,
    16. Griesenbach U,
    17. Hasegawa M,
    18. Higgins TE,
    19. Hironaka T,
    20. Hyndman L,
    21. McLachlan G,
    22. Inoue M,
    23. Hyde SC,
    24. Innes JA,
    25. Maher TM,
    26. Moran C,
    27. Meng C,
    28. Paul-Smith MC,
    29. Pringle IA,
    30. Pytel KM,
    31. Rodriguez-Martinez A,
    32. Schmidt AC,
    33. Stevenson BJ,
    34. Sumner-Jones SG,
    35. Toshner R,
    36. Tsugumine S,
    37. Wasowicz MW,
    38. Zhu J
    : Preparation for a first-in-man lentivirus trial in patients with cystic fibrosis. Thorax 72(2): 137-147, 2017. PMID: 27852956. DOI: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2016-208406
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  82. ↵
    1. Nonnenmacher M,
    2. Weber T
    : Adeno-associated virus 2 infection requires endocytosis through the CLIC/GEEC pathway. Cell Host Microbe 10(6): 563-76, 2011. PMID: 22177561. DOI: 10.1016/j.chom.2011.10.014
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  83. ↵
    1. Zhang Y,
    2. Lu J,
    3. Ma j,
    4. Liu X
    : Insulin-induced gene 1 (INSIG1) inhibitis HIV-1 production by degrading Gag via activity of the ubiquitin ligase TRC8. J Biol Chem 294(6): 2046-2059, 2019. PMID: 30563842. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.RA118.004630
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  84. ↵
    1. Liu C,
    2. Liu Y,
    3. Liang L,
    4. Cui S,
    5. Zhang Y
    : RNA-Seq based transcriptome analysis during bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV) infection. BMC Genomics 20(1): 774, 2019. PMID: 31651237. DOI: 10.1186/s12864-019-6120-4
    OpenUrl
  85. ↵
    1. Siddigui R,
    2. Suzu S,
    3. Ueno M,
    4. Nasser H,
    5. Koba R,
    6. Bhuyan F,
    7. Noyori O,
    8. Hamidi S,
    9. Sheng G,
    10. Yasuda-Inoue M,
    11. Hishiki T,
    12. Sukegawa S,
    13. Miyagi E,
    14. Strebel K,
    15. Matsushita S,
    16. Shimotohno K,
    17. Ariumi Y
    : Apolipoprotein E is an HIV-1-inducible inhibitor of viral production and infectivity in macrophages. PLoS Pathog 14(11): e1007372, 2018. PMID: 30496280. DOI: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1007372
    OpenUrl
  86. ↵
    1. Qiao L,
    2. Luo GG
    : Human apolipoprotein E promotes hepatitis B virus infection and production. PLoS Pathog 15(8): e1007874, 2019. PMID: 31393946. DOI: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1007874
    OpenUrl
  87. ↵
    1. Kivela AM,
    2. Huusko J,
    3. Gurzeler E,
    4. Laine A,
    5. Dijkstra MH,
    6. Dragneva G,
    7. Andersen CB,
    8. Moestrup SK,
    9. Ylä-Herttuala S
    : High plasma lipid levels reduce efficacy of adenovirus-mediated gene therapy. Sci Rep 7(1): 386, 2017. PMID: 28341860. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-00376-5
    OpenUrl
  88. ↵
    1. Lefèvre M,
    2. Felmlee DJ,
    3. Parnot M,
    4. Baumert TF,
    5. Schuster C
    : Syndecan 4 is involved in mediating HCV entry through interaction with lipoviral particle-associated apolipoprotein E. PLoS One 9(4): e95550, 2014. PMID: 24751902. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0095550
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  89. ↵
    1. Long J,
    2. Roy RB,
    3. Zhang YJ,
    4. Antrobus R,
    5. Du Y,
    6. Smith DL,
    7. Weekes MP,
    8. Javid B
    : Plasma membrane profiling reveals upregulation of ABCA1 by infected macrophages leading to restriction of mycobacterial growth. Front Microbiol 7: 1086, 2016. PMID: 27462310. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01086
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  90. ↵
    1. Arnold N,
    2. Girke T,
    3. Sureshchandra S,
    4. Messaoudi I
    : Acute simian varicella virus infection causes robust and sustained changes in gene expression in the sensory ganglia. J Virol 90(23): 10823-10843, 2016. PMID: 27681124. DOI: 10.1128/JVI.01272-16
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  91. ↵
    1. Aqil M,
    2. Mallik S,
    3. Bondyopadhyay S,
    4. Maulik U,
    5. Jameel S
    : Transcriptomic analysis of mRNAs in human monocytic cells expressing the HIV-1 Nef Protein and their exosomes. Biomed Res Int 2015: 492395, 2015. PMID: 25961023. DOI: 10.1155/2015/492395
    OpenUrl
  92. ↵
    1. Lerch TF,
    2. O'Donnell JK,
    3. Mayer NL,
    4. Xie Q,
    5. Taylor KA,
    6. Stagg SM,
    7. Chapman MS
    : Structure of RAAV-DJ, a retargeted gene therapy vector: cryo-electron microscopy at 4.5Å resolution. Structure 20(8): 1310-1320, 2012. PMID: 22727812. DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2012.05.004
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  93. ↵
    1. van Lieshout LP,
    2. Domm JM,
    3. Rindler TN,
    4. Frost KL,
    5. Sorensen DL,
    6. Medina SJ,
    7. Booth SA,
    8. Bridges JP,
    9. Wootton SK
    : A novel triple-mutant RAAV6 capsid induces rapid and potent transgene expression in the muscle and respiratory tract of mice. Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev 9: 323-329, 2018. PMID: 30038936. DOI: 10.1016/j.omtm.2018.04.005
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research
Vol. 40, Issue 8
August 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Mosaic Recombinant Adeno-associated Virus Vector rAAV/DJ/CAG for Targeted Gene Delivery to Melanoma Cells Metastasized to the Lung
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 5 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Mosaic Recombinant Adeno-associated Virus Vector rAAV/DJ/CAG for Targeted Gene Delivery to Melanoma Cells Metastasized to the Lung
MILENA CZAJKA, AGNIESZKA ZAJKOWSKA, MACIEJ GAWLAK, MAGDALENA BUJALSKA-ZADROZNY, MACIEJ MALECKI
Anticancer Research Aug 2020, 40 (8) 4425-4444; DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.14448

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Mosaic Recombinant Adeno-associated Virus Vector rAAV/DJ/CAG for Targeted Gene Delivery to Melanoma Cells Metastasized to the Lung
MILENA CZAJKA, AGNIESZKA ZAJKOWSKA, MACIEJ GAWLAK, MAGDALENA BUJALSKA-ZADROZNY, MACIEJ MALECKI
Anticancer Research Aug 2020, 40 (8) 4425-4444; DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.14448
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Integrative Analysis Combining Machine Learning and Functional Experiments Uncovers ISG15 As a Key Determinant of Cisplatin Resistance in Gastric Cancer
  • Allow Aloe to Do the Work: Aloe vera Constrains Growth of Bladder Cancer Cells and Modulates Expression of Key Costimulatory Molecules
  • PKF118-310 as a Potential Small Molecule Inhibitor Targeting the Wnt/β-Catenin Pathway for Gastric Cancer Therapy
Show more Experimental Studies

Keywords

  • Melanoma
  • metastatic melanoma
  • rAAV
  • intranasal delivery
  • lungs
Anticancer Research

© 2026 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire