Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleClinical Studies

Variants of SLC22A16 Predict the Efficacy of Platinum Combination Chemotherapy in Advanced Non-small-cell Lung Cancer

AKIRA TAKEUCHI, TETSUYA OGURI, SATOSHI FUKUDA, KAZUKI SONE, YUSUKE KAGAWA, TAKEHIRO UEMURA, OSAMU TAKAKUWA, KEN MAENO, KENSUKE FUKUMITSU, YOSHIHIRO KANEMITSU, TOMOKO TAJIRI, HIROTSUGU OHKUBO, MASAYA TAKEMURA, YUTAKA ITO and AKIO NIIMI
Anticancer Research August 2020, 40 (8) 4245-4251; DOI: https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.14426
AKIRA TAKEUCHI
1Department of Respiratory Medicine, Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
TETSUYA OGURI
1Department of Respiratory Medicine, Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan
2Department of Education and Research Center for Community Medicine, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: t-oguri{at}med.nagoya-cu.ac.jp
SATOSHI FUKUDA
1Department of Respiratory Medicine, Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
KAZUKI SONE
1Department of Respiratory Medicine, Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
YUSUKE KAGAWA
1Department of Respiratory Medicine, Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
TAKEHIRO UEMURA
1Department of Respiratory Medicine, Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
OSAMU TAKAKUWA
3Department of Education and Research Center for Advanced Medicine, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
KEN MAENO
1Department of Respiratory Medicine, Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
KENSUKE FUKUMITSU
1Department of Respiratory Medicine, Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
YOSHIHIRO KANEMITSU
1Department of Respiratory Medicine, Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
TOMOKO TAJIRI
1Department of Respiratory Medicine, Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
HIROTSUGU OHKUBO
1Department of Respiratory Medicine, Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MASAYA TAKEMURA
1Department of Respiratory Medicine, Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan
2Department of Education and Research Center for Community Medicine, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
YUTAKA ITO
1Department of Respiratory Medicine, Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
AKIO NIIMI
1Department of Respiratory Medicine, Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background: Organic cation transporter 6 (OCT6) encoded by solute carrier family 22 member 16 (SLC22A16) is involved in regulating cellular sensitivity and resistance to platinum derivatives. SLC22A16 has functional genetic variants but the association between these variants and the effectiveness of antitumor drugs remains unexplored. Patients and Methods: This study retrospectively analyzed data from 160 patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with platinum-based combination chemotherapy for first-line chemotherapy between October 2010 and May 2018. We investigated the association between the genetic variant of SLC22A16 and clinical outcomes. Results: Patients with the rs714368 GG genotype had a shorter progression-free survival than those with AA or AG. Gene polymorphism was not associated with adverse effects. The predictive effect of rs714368 was confirmed in multivariate analysis using a Cox proportional hazards model. Conclusion: A genetic variant of SLC22A16 is a potential predictive biomarker for response to platinum-based chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer.

  • SLC22A16
  • rs714368
  • biomarker
  • cytotoxic chemotherapy

Treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has changed dramatically because of the evolution of kinase inhibitors and the development of immune checkpoint inhibitors. Although selected patients benefit tremendously from the efficacy of these precision medicines, cytotoxic chemotherapy is still important for use in combination with immunotherapy (1-3) or in patients for whom molecular or immunotherapy fails. Platinum derivatives (cisplatin and carboplatin) and third-generation anticancer drugs are key agents for treating NSCLC. Pemetrexed is more effective than other drugs for non-squamous NSCLC (4). Therefore, the combination of platinum derivatives and pemetrexed is standard in such cases. The efficacy of cytotoxic chemotherapy is limited, however, and the mechanisms underlying resistance to it remain unclear. Multiple factors have been found to be associated with cisplatin resistance (5). One of the important mechanisms is the reduction of the intracellular platinum concentration caused by reduction of influx or promotion of efflux.

We previously reported that organic cation transporter 6 (OCT6) is a mediator of platinum influx into cancer cells, and down-regulation of OCT6 is one mechanism of acquired platinum resistance in lung cancer (6), as it is with other platinum derivatives (7). Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are the most common type of genetic variation. Polymorphisms of solute carrier family 22 member 16 (SLC22A16) are reported to influence doxorubicin pharmacokinetics (8) and are associated with neutropenia in doxorubicin-based chemotherapy (9). However, it is unknown whether SLC22A16 polymorphisms affect the efficacy of platinum-based cytotoxic chemotherapy. The aim in this study was to clarify the association between SNPs of SLC22A16 and clinical outcomes of patients with NSCLC treated with platinum-based cytotoxic chemotherapy.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

Patient characteristics (n=160).

Patients and Methods

Patients and chemotherapies. We retrospectively reviewed data from patients with advanced NSCLC who received platinum-based first-line chemotherapy at Nagoya City University Hospital with any of the following regimens: Cisplatin (75 mg/m2) or carboplatin [area under the curve of 6 mg/ml/min (AUC 6)] plus pemetrexed (500 mg/m2), with or without bevacizumab (15 mg/kg); carboplatin (AUC 6) plus paclitaxel (200 mg/m2) or nab-paclitaxel (100 mg/m2); cisplatin (80 mg/m2) or carboplatin (AUC 5) plus gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2); or cisplatin (80 mg/m2) plus docetaxel (60 mg/m2). Patients who underwent surgery or curative chemoradiotherapy were excluded. We obtained peripheral blood samples from the patients before treatment in order to analyze SNPs. We recorded patient characteristics, clinical outcomes according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 and adverse effects (myelosuppression, liver function and creatinine) according to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5.0 using data supplied by the attending physicians from medical records. All procedures involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee of Nagoya city university (no. 70-00-0095) and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. We obtained written informed consent from all patients, and all medical data were anonymized.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table II.

The genotypic and allelic frequencies of solute carrier family 22-member 16 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) determined in this study.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table III.

Association between solute carrier family 22 member 16 rs714368 single nucleotide polymorphism and response to chemotherapy.

Genomic DNA extraction and detection of drug transporter polymorphisms. Genomic DNA was extracted from the blood samples of 160 patients with NSCLC using QIAamp DNA Mini Kit (Qiagen; Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer's instructions. SLC22A16 SNPs were detected using the StepOnePlus Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems; Foster City, CA, USA) and TaqMan SNP Genotyping Assays (rs714368, NM_033125.4:c.146A>G, C___2256675_10; and rs12210538, NM_033125.4:c.1226T>C, C__22271871_10). We chose these SNPs based on a previous report (10). All assays were purchased from Applied Biosystems and used in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions.

Statistical analysis. The response rate (RR) was defined as the sum of the complete response (CR) and partial response (PR) rates, and the disease control rate (DCR) was defined as the sum of CR, PR and stable disease (SD) rates. RR and DCR were compared using Fisher's exact test, with p<0.05 considered statistically significant.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table IV.

Association between solute carrier family 22 member 16 rs714368 single nucleotide polymorphism and survival.

Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined from the date chemotherapy was first begun to the date of disease progression, death, or last follow-up. Overall survival (OS) was defined from the date chemotherapy was first begun to the date of death or last follow-up. These outcomes were analyzed according to SNP genotype using the Kaplan–Meier method and log-rank test, with p<0.05 considered statistically significant. Correlations of the frequency of adverse effects (myelosuppression, liver function or renal function) with gene polymorphisms were compared using Fisher's exact test. Finally, we performed multivariate analysis using a Cox proportional hazards model to examine the relationship of clinical outcomes and adverse effects with SNP genotype and clinical characteristics. In this model, we used p=0.10 in the log-rank test as the threshold for inclusion of a covariate in the model, with p<0.05 subsequently considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed with EZR (Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, Saitama, Japan), a graphical user interface for R (The R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria), which is a modified version of R commander designed to add statistical functions frequently used in biostatistics (11).

Results

Data from a total of 160 patients were assessed in this study (Table I). The median age was 67 years, 117 were men, and 116 were current or former smokers. Most patients had disease stage IV (83.8%). The histological diagnosis was lung adenocarcinoma in the majority of patients (68.1%). Thirty-six patients had driver mutations: epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation in 31 patients (15 with exon 19 deletion, 14 with L858R mutation and two with L861Q mutation) and anaplastic lymphoma kinase fusion gene in five patients. Programmed cell death ligand 1 expression was positive in 15 patients but not evaluated in most (87.5%).

The RR was 43.8%, the DCR was 82.6%, the median PFS was 124 days, and the median OS was 533 days. Two patients were excluded from assessment of treatment response as the treatment efficacy was not evaluated.

The genotypic and allelic frequencies targeted SNPs are shown in Table II. We excluded rs12210538 as a covariate as all patients in the study had the major homoallele, a finding that concurred with the results of the 1000 Genomes Project data in the East Asian population. Outcomes according to SNPs are shown in Tables III and IV. Carriers of the rs714368 A allele had a significantly longer median PFS than those with the GG genotype (140 vs. 93 days, p=0.022) (Figure 1). RR, DCR and OS did not significantly differ by SNP genotype (RR=44.8% vs. 41.7%, p>0.99; DCR, 83.6% vs. 83.3%, p>0.99; median OS, 530 vs. 533 days, p=0.85).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Progression-free survival according to the dominant model of the solute carrier family 22 member 16 rs714368 single nucleotide polymorphism. These data were analyzed by Kaplan–Meier methods and compared using the log-rank test.

We performed univariate analysis based on patient background to determine factors associated with clinical outcomes (Table V). In addition to carriers of the rs714368 A allele, patients with stage III disease had a longer PFS than those with stage IV (median=172.5 vs. 121 days, p=0.042), and those with history of smoking tended to have a longer PFS than never smokers (median=126 vs. 108 days, p=0.076). Multivariate analysis was conducted to assess predictive factors significantly associated with PFS. Stage, smoking history, and rs714368 genotypes were used as covariates in this model. Factors predictive of a poor PFS were stage IV versus III disease [hazard ratio (HR)=1.76, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.117-2.771; p=0.015] and rs714368 GG genotype versus AA or AG (HR=1.945, 95% CI=1.212-3.122; p=0.006) (Table VI).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table V.

Univariate analysis of survival according to clinical characteristics.

There were no associations between gene polymorphisms and adverse effects (myelosuppression, liver function or renal function) (Table VII).

Discussion

Cytotoxic chemotherapy for NSCLC yields paradoxical tumor responses from patient to patient, even among those with similar tumor pathology. For this reason, it is important to find biomarkers predictive of treatment response so as to give more patients greater treatment benefits. In this study, we investigated the association between treatment outcomes in advanced NSCLC treated with platinum-based cytotoxic chemotherapy and SNPs of SLC22A16. A novel finding was that A carriers of the SLC22A16 rs714368 had a longer PFS compared with those with GG genotype.

Platinum derivatives are key drugs for treating lung cancer, particularly when used in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors (1-3). Additional cytotoxic chemotherapy yields tumor volume reduction, which helps prevent early treatment failure of immune-cytotoxic combination therapy. Platinum-based chemotherapy combined with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors may provide better efficacy than sequential monotherapy (12). Given the importance of cytotoxic chemotherapy in combination with newer agents to treat NSCLC, predictive biomarkers of response or resistance are needed.

Understanding the mechanisms of resistance to cytotoxic chemotherapy is a key issue. Tumor cells become resistant to cisplatin by multiple pathways, including reduction of intake, inactivation by glutathione (13), increased DNA repair (14, 15), and overexpression of drug-efflux pumps (16-18). One of the major factors determining the chemotherapeutic activity of platinum is drug influx (19), as that directly affects the intracellular drug concentration and cell damage the drug causes. The OCT family is associated with the transport of platinum drugs (20). OCT2, expressed at the basolateral membrane of renal tubular epithelial cell, transports cisplatin and is associated with nephrotoxicity (21). Certain OCT2 SNPs have been shown to be associated with this adverse effect of platinum-based chemotherapy for NSCLC (22). Down-regulation of OCT3 in hepatocellular carcinoma leads to diminished cisplatin sensitivity (23). We previously reported that OCT6 contributes to platinum influx into tumor cells. Cisplatin-resistant cell lines have reduced OCT6 expression and lower intracellular platinum accumulation compared with their respective parental cell lines. Up-regulation of OCT6 results in intracellular platinum accumulation and tumor sensitivity to cisplatin (6). OCT6 affects transport into tumor cells not only of cisplatin but also of other platinum derivatives (7). In addition, cisplatin-resistant cell lines were also less sensitive to carboplatin or other platinum derivatives than parental cell lines (24). In summary, OCT6 appears to affect cancer cell sensitivity to platinum derivatives, and its down-regulation is associated with tumor platinum resistance.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table VI.

Multivariate analysis of progression-free survival.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table VII.

The frequency of adverse event about myelosuppression, liver function and renal function.

The SLC22A family of transporters have a similar membrane topology: 12 α-helical transmembrane domains, a large extracellular loop between domains 1 and 2, and a large intracellular loop between domains 6 and 7 (25). Among SLC22A16 polymorphisms, rs714368 is located at the large extracellular loop and rs12210538 at domain 8. Most reports of SLC22A16 SNPs have assessed adverse effect of doxorubicin rather than treatment outcome. Some indicated that the rs714368 G allele increased exposure to doxorubicin (8) and gastrointestinal events (26). Other studies showed that the rs714368 A allele increased the incidence of having to delay doses of doxorubicin because of myelosuppression (27), apparently resulting from overexposure to doxorubicin in patients with A-bearing genotypes. These findings suggest rs714368 may have an important role in modulating doxorubicin pharmacokinetics. In addition, SLC22A16 may have an especially large adverse influence on hematopoiesis by accumulation of doxorubicin, as the gene's expression is restricted to hematopoietic cells (28) and testis (29) in normal adult tissues. The large difference in the expression of each organ may be the cause of seemingly contradictory associations between SNPs and adverse effects. While the G allele increases drug concentration in the blood, the A allele may increase doxorubicin influx into target tissues such as tumor cells and hematopoietic cells. On the other hand, our study showed no association between rs714368 polymorphisms and adverse effects (Table VII). Although doxorubicin is mainly metabolized in the liver, platinum derivatives are excreted from the kidneys. The differences of drug excretion route may affect the findings regarding adverse effects. As previously mentioned, OCT2 is mainly expressed in renal cells and is associated with nephrotoxicity, and SLC22A16 polymorphisms may have no influence on adverse effects. the functional implications of differences in SLC22A16 SNPs are still unclear. However, it is reported that other transporters introducing different SNPs affected drug sensitivity of tumor cell lines without changing the transporter expression level (30). Without a change in expression level, SLC22A16 rs714368 may influence not only pharmacokinetics but also transporter function and influx of drugs, resulting in varied clinical outcomes because of differences in intracellular platinum concentrations.

Platinum derivatives are usually used with third-generation cytotoxic drugs including pemetrexed, which is a key drug in non-squamous NSCLC treatment strategy. Using multiple biomarkers associated with each cytotoxic drug to predict combination chemotherapy outcomes would be a reasonable idea. It is known that treatment outcomes in pemetrexed containing chemotherapy are influenced by gene polymorphisms of folylpoly-γ-glutamate synthase, an enzyme that metabolizes pemetrexed (31). Tumor markers are also potential predictors of response to chemotherapy or kinase inhibitors (32, 33). Combining several biomarkers may therefore be more informative for predicting treatment response rather than using just one.

This study may have selection bias, as it was a retrospective, single-institution study. However, investigations of how SLC22A16 gene polymorphisms affect OCT6 function are important in furthering our understanding of tumor response and resistance.

In conclusion, we demonstrated that a SLC22A16 SNP is a potential biomarker predictive of the effect of platinum-based chemotherapy for advanced NSCLC. A paradigm shift in NSCLC treatment strategies is occurring with the use of cytotoxic chemotherapy combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors or tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Identification of acquired treatment-resistance mechanisms for each particular regimen is important in individualizing treatment for this cancer.

Acknowledgements

The Authors would like to thank Enago (www.enago.jp) for the English language review.

Footnotes

  • Authors' Contributions

    AT and TO designed the study and wrote the initial draft of the article. AT, SF, KS, and YK analyzed gene polymorphisms. AT, TO, SF, KS, TU, OT and KM contributed to the analysis and interpretation of data and assisted in the preparation of the article. TO, SF, KM, KF, YK, TT, HO, MT, YI and AN contributed to data collection and interpretation. All authors reviewed the article and approved the definitive version of the article and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

  • Conflicts of Interest

    TO received honorarium by Chugai Pharmaceutical and research funding by Boehringer Ingelheim.

  • Funding

    This study was funded by JSPS KAKENHI (grant number JP15K08593).

  • Received May 13, 2020.
  • Revision received July 3, 2020.
  • Accepted July 6, 2020.
  • Copyright© 2020, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved

References

  1. ↵
    1. Gandhi L,
    2. Rodriguez-Abreu D,
    3. Gadgeel S,
    4. Esteban E,
    5. Felip E,
    6. De Angelis F,
    7. Domine M,
    8. Clingan P,
    9. Hochmair MJ,
    10. Powell SF,
    11. Cheng SY,
    12. Bischoff HG,
    13. Peled N,
    14. Grossi F,
    15. Jennens RR,
    16. Reck M,
    17. Hui R,
    18. Garon EB,
    19. Boyer M,
    20. Rubio-Viqueira B,
    21. Novello S,
    22. Kurata T,
    23. Gray JE,
    24. Vida J,
    25. Wei Z,
    26. Yang J,
    27. Raftopoulos H,
    28. Pietanza MC,
    29. Garassino MC
    : Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 378(22): 2078-2092, 2018. PMID: 29658856. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1801005
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Paz-Ares L,
    2. Luft A,
    3. Vicente D,
    4. Tafreshi A,
    5. Gumus M,
    6. Mazieres J,
    7. Hermes B,
    8. Cay Senler F,
    9. Csoszi T,
    10. Fulop A,
    11. Rodriguez-Cid J,
    12. Wilson J,
    13. Sugawara S,
    14. Kato T,
    15. Lee KH,
    16. Cheng Y,
    17. Novello S,
    18. Halmos B,
    19. Li X,
    20. Lubiniecki GM,
    21. Piperdi B,
    22. Kowalski DM
    : Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy for squamous non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 379(21): 2040-2051, 2018. PMID: 30280635. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1810865
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Socinski MA,
    2. Jotte RM,
    3. Cappuzzo F,
    4. Orlandi F,
    5. Stroyakovskiy D,
    6. Nogami N,
    7. Rodriguez-Abreu D,
    8. Moro-Sibilot D,
    9. Thomas CA,
    10. Barlesi F,
    11. Finley G,
    12. Kelsch C,
    13. Lee A,
    14. Coleman S,
    15. Deng Y,
    16. Shen Y,
    17. Kowanetz M,
    18. Lopez-Chavez A,
    19. Sandler A,
    20. Reck M
    : Atezolizumab for first-line treatment of metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC. N Engl J Med 378(24): 2288-2301, 2018. PMID: 29863955. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1716948
    OpenUrlPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Scagliotti GV,
    2. Parikh P,
    3. von Pawel J,
    4. Biesma B,
    5. Vansteenkiste J,
    6. Manegold C,
    7. Serwatowski P,
    8. Gatzemeier U,
    9. Digumarti R,
    10. Zukin M,
    11. Lee JS,
    12. Mellemgaard A,
    13. Park K,
    14. Patil S,
    15. Rolski J,
    16. Goksel T,
    17. de Marinis F,
    18. Simms L,
    19. Sugarman KP,
    20. Gandara D
    : Phase iii study comparing cisplatin plus gemcitabine with cisplatin plus pemetrexed in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced-stage non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 26(21): 3543-3551, 2008. PMID: 18506025. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2007.15.0375
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Amable L
    : Cisplatin resistance and opportunities for precision medicine. Pharmacol Res 106: 27-36, 2016. PMID: 26804248. DOI: 10.1016/j.phrs.2016.01.001
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  5. ↵
    1. Kunii E,
    2. Oguri T,
    3. Kasai D,
    4. Ozasa H,
    5. Uemura T,
    6. Takakuwa O,
    7. Ohkubo H,
    8. Takemura M,
    9. Maeno K,
    10. Niimi A
    : Organic cation transporter OCT6 mediates cisplatin uptake and resistance to cisplatin in lung cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 75(5): 985-991, 2015. PMID: 25772757. DOI: 10.1007/s00280-015-2723-x
    OpenUrl
  6. ↵
    1. Oguri T,
    2. Kunii E,
    3. Fukuda S,
    4. Sone K,
    5. Uemura T,
    6. Takakuwa O,
    7. Kanemitsu Y,
    8. Ohkubo H,
    9. Takemura M,
    10. Maeno K,
    11. Ito Y,
    12. Niimi A
    : Organic cation transporter 6 directly confers resistance to anticancer platinum drugs. Biomed Rep 5(5): 639-643, 2016. PMID: 27882231. DOI: 10.3892/br.2016.772
    OpenUrl
  7. ↵
    1. Lal S,
    2. Wong ZW,
    3. Jada SR,
    4. Xiang X,
    5. Chen Shu X,
    6. Ang PC,
    7. Figg WD,
    8. Lee EJ,
    9. Chowbay B
    : Novel slc22a16 polymorphisms and influence on doxorubicin pharmacokinetics in asian breast cancer patients. Pharmacogenomics 8(6): 567-575, 2007. PMID: 17559346. DOI: 10.2217/14622416.8.6.567
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Faraji A,
    2. Dehghan Manshadi HR,
    3. Mobaraki M,
    4. Zare M,
    5. Houshmand M
    : Association of ABCB1 and SLC22A16 gene polymorphisms with incidence of doxorubicin-induced febrile neutropenia: A survey of iranian breast cancer patients. PLoS One 11(12): e0168519, 2016. PMID: 28036387. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168519
    OpenUrl
  9. ↵
    1. Tecza K,
    2. Pamula-Pilat J,
    3. Lanuszewska J,
    4. Grzybowska E
    : Genetic polymorphisms and response to 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide chemotherapy in breast cancer patients. Oncotarget 7(41): 66790-66808, 2016. PMID: 27527855. DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.11053
    OpenUrl
  10. ↵
    1. Kanda Y
    : Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software ‘EZR’ for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transplant 48(3): 452-458, 2013. PMID: 27527855. DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.11053
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Hosomi Y,
    2. Morita S,
    3. Sugawara S,
    4. Kato T,
    5. Fukuhara T,
    6. Gemma A,
    7. Takahashi K,
    8. Fujita Y,
    9. Harada T,
    10. Minato K,
    11. Takamura K,
    12. Hagiwara K,
    13. Kobayashi K,
    14. Nukiwa T,
    15. Inoue A,
    16. North-East Japan Study Group
    : Gefitinib alone versus gefitinib plus chemotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer with mutated epidermal growth factor receptor: NEJ009 study. J Clin Oncol 38(2): 115-123, 2020. PMID: 31682542. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.19.01488
    OpenUrl
  12. ↵
    1. Oguri T,
    2. Fujiwara Y,
    3. Miyazaki M,
    4. Takahashi T,
    5. Kurata T,
    6. Yokozaki M,
    7. Ohashi N,
    8. Isobe T,
    9. Katoh O,
    10. Yamakido M
    : Induction of gamma-glutamylcysteine synthetase gene expression by platinum drugs in peripheral mononuclear cells of lung cancer patients. Ann Oncol 10(4): 455-460, 1999. PMID: 10370789. DOI: 10.1023/a:1008317502977
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Reed E
    : Platinum–DNA adduct, nucleotide excision repair and platinum based anti-cancer chemotherapy. Cancer Treat Rev 24(5): 331-344, 1998. PMID: 9861196. DOI: 10.1016/s0305-7372(98)90056-1
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Olaussen KA,
    2. Dunant A,
    3. Fouret P,
    4. Brambilla E,
    5. Andre F,
    6. Haddad V,
    7. Taranchon E,
    8. Filipits M,
    9. Pirker R,
    10. Popper HH,
    11. Stahel R,
    12. Sabatier L,
    13. Pignon JP,
    14. Tursz T,
    15. Le Chevalier T,
    16. Soria JC
    : DNA repair by ERCC1 in non-small-cell lung cancer and cisplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy. N Engl J Med 355(10): 983-991, 2006. PMID: 16957145. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa060570
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Oguri T,
    2. Fujiwara Y,
    3. Isobe T,
    4. Katoh O,
    5. Watanabe H,
    6. Yamakido M
    : Expression of gamma-glutamylcysteine synthetase (gamma-GCS) and multidrug resistance-associated protein (MRP), but not human canalicular multispecific organic anion transporter (CMOAT), genes correlates with exposure of human lung cancers to platinum drugs. Br J Cancer 77(7): 1089-1096, 1998. PMID: 9569044. DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1998.181
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Oguri T,
    2. Isobe T,
    3. Suzuki T,
    4. Nishio K,
    5. Fujiwara Y,
    6. Katoh O,
    7. Yamakido M
    : Increased expression of the MRP5 gene is associated with exposure to platinum drugs in lung cancer. Int J Cancer 86(1): 95-100, 2000. PMID: 10728601. DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0215(20000401)86:1<95::aid-ijc15>3.0.co;2-g
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Oguri T,
    2. Isobe T,
    3. Fujitaka K,
    4. Ishikawa N,
    5. Kohno N
    : Association between expression of the MRP3 gene and exposure to platinum drugs in lung cancer. Int J Cancer 93(4): 584-589, 2001. PMID: 11477564. DOI: 10.1002/ijc.1369
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Ho GY,
    2. Woodward N,
    3. Coward JI
    : Cisplatin versus carboplatin: Comparative review of therapeutic management in solid malignancies. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 102: 37-46, 2016. PMID: 27105947. DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2016.03.014
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Zhang S,
    2. Lovejoy KS,
    3. Shima JE,
    4. Lagpacan LL,
    5. Shu Y,
    6. Lapuk A,
    7. Chen Y,
    8. Komori T,
    9. Gray JW,
    10. Chen X,
    11. Lippard SJ,
    12. Giacomini KM
    : Organic cation transporters are determinants of oxaliplatin cytotoxicity. Cancer Res 66(17): 8847-8857, 2006. PMID: 16951202. DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-0769
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    1. Yonezawa A,
    2. Masuda S,
    3. Yokoo S,
    4. Katsura T,
    5. Inui K
    : Cisplatin and oxaliplatin, but not carboplatin and nedaplatin, are substrates for human organic cation transporters (SLC22A1-3 and multidrug and toxin extrusion family). J Pharmacol Exp Ther 319(2): 879-886, 2006. PMID: 16914559. DOI: 10.1124/jpet.106.110346
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    1. Qian CY,
    2. Zheng Y,
    3. Wang Y,
    4. Chen J,
    5. Liu JY,
    6. Zhou HH,
    7. Yin JY,
    8. Liu ZQ
    : Associations of genetic polymorphisms of the transporters organic cation transporter 2 (OCT2), multidrug and toxin extrusion 1 (MATE1), and atp-binding cassette subfamily C member 2 (ABCC2) with platinum-based chemotherapy response and toxicity in non-small cell lung cancer patients. Chin J Cancer 35(1): 85, 2016. PMID: 27590272. DOI: 10.1186/s40880-016-0145-8
    OpenUrl
  21. ↵
    1. Guttmann S,
    2. Chandhok G,
    3. Groba SR,
    4. Niemietz C,
    5. Sauer V,
    6. Gomes A,
    7. Ciarimboli G,
    8. Karst U,
    9. Zibert A,
    10. Schmidt HH
    : Organic cation transporter 3 mediates cisplatin and copper cross-resistance in hepatoma cells. Oncotarget 9(1): 743-754, 2018. PMID: 29416650. DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.23142
    OpenUrl
  22. ↵
    1. Rixe O,
    2. Ortuzar W,
    3. Alvarez M,
    4. Parker R,
    5. Reed E,
    6. Paull K,
    7. Fojo T
    : Oxaliplatin, tetraplatin, cisplatin, and carboplatin: Spectrum of activity in drug-resistant cell lines and in the cell lines of the National Cancer Institute's Anticancer Drug Screen Panel. Biochem Pharmacol 52(12), 1996. PMID: 8951344. DOI: 10.1016/s0006-2952(97)81490-6
  23. ↵
    1. Koepsell H,
    2. Endou H
    : The SLC22 drug transporter family. Pflugers Arch 447(5): 666-676, 2004. PMID: 12883891. DOI: 10.1007/s00424-003-1089-9
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Tecza K,
    2. Pamula-Pilat J,
    3. Lanuszewska J,
    4. Butkiewicz D,
    5. Grzybowska E
    : Pharmacogenetics of toxicity of 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide chemotherapy in breast cancer patients. Oncotarget 9(10): 9114-9136, 2018. PMID: 29507678. DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.24148
    OpenUrl
  25. ↵
    1. Bray J,
    2. Sludden J,
    3. Griffin MJ,
    4. Cole M,
    5. Verrill M,
    6. Jamieson D,
    7. Boddy AV
    : Influence of pharmacogenetics on response and toxicity in breast cancer patients treated with doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide. Br J Cancer 102(6): 1003-1009, 2010. PMID: 20179710. DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605587
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Okabe M,
    2. Unno M,
    3. Harigae H,
    4. Kaku M,
    5. Okitsu Y,
    6. Sasaki T,
    7. Mizoi T,
    8. Shiiba K,
    9. Takanaga H,
    10. Terasaki T,
    11. Matsuno S,
    12. Sasaki I,
    13. Ito S,
    14. Abe T
    : Characterization of the organic cation transporter SLC22A16: A doxorubicin importer. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 333(3): 754-762, 2005. PMID: 15963465. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.05.174
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Enomoto A,
    2. Wempe MF,
    3. Tsuchida H,
    4. Shin HJ,
    5. Cha SH,
    6. Anzai N,
    7. Goto A,
    8. Sakamoto A,
    9. Niwa T,
    10. Kanai Y,
    11. Anders MW,
    12. Endou H
    : Molecular identification of a novel carnitine transporter specific to human testis. Insights into the mechanism of carnitine recognition. J Biol Chem 277(39): 36262-36271, 2002. PMID: 12089149. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M203883200
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    1. Sone K,
    2. Oguri T,
    3. Uemura T,
    4. Takeuchi A,
    5. Fukuda S,
    6. Takakuwa O,
    7. Maeno K,
    8. Fukumitsu K,
    9. Kanemitsu Y,
    10. Ohkubo H,
    11. Takemura M,
    12. Ito Y,
    13. Niimi A
    : Genetic variation in the ATP-binding cassette transporter ABCC10 is associated with neutropenia for docetaxel in japanese lung cancer patients cohort. BMC Cancer 19(1): 246, 2019. PMID: 30890141. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-019-5438-2
    OpenUrl
  29. ↵
    1. Fukuda S,
    2. Oguri T,
    3. Kunii E,
    4. Sone K,
    5. Uemura T,
    6. Takakuwa O,
    7. Maeno K,
    8. Kanemitsu Y,
    9. Ohkubo H,
    10. Takemura M,
    11. Ito Y,
    12. Niimi A
    : A folylpoly-gamma-glutamate synthase single nucleotide polymorphism associated with response to pemetrexed treatment combined with platinum for non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer 102: 15-20, 2016. PMID: 27987582. DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2016.10.006
    OpenUrl
  30. ↵
    1. Sone K,
    2. Oguri T,
    3. Nakao M,
    4. Kagawa Y,
    5. Kurowaka R,
    6. Furuta H,
    7. Fukuda S,
    8. Uemura T,
    9. Takakuwa O,
    10. Kanemitsu Y,
    11. Ohkubo H,
    12. Takemura M,
    13. Maeno K,
    14. Ito Y,
    15. Sato H,
    16. Muramatsu H,
    17. Niimi A
    : CYFRA 21-1 as a predictive marker for non-small cell lung cancer treated with pemetrexed-based chemotherapy. Anticancer Res 37(2): 935-939, 2017. PMID: 28179355. DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.11402
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. ↵
    1. Takeuchi A,
    2. Oguri T,
    3. Sone K,
    4. Ito K,
    5. Kitamura Y,
    6. Inoue Y,
    7. Asano T,
    8. Fukuda S,
    9. Kanemitsu Y,
    10. Takakuwa O,
    11. Ohkubo H,
    12. Takemura M,
    13. Maeno K,
    14. Ito Y,
    15. Niimi A
    : Predictive and prognostic value of CYFRA 21-1 for advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with EGFR-TKIs. Anticancer Res 37(10): 5771-5776, 2017. PMID: 28982900. DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.12018
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research
Vol. 40, Issue 8
August 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Variants of SLC22A16 Predict the Efficacy of Platinum Combination Chemotherapy in Advanced Non-small-cell Lung Cancer
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
5 + 15 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Variants of SLC22A16 Predict the Efficacy of Platinum Combination Chemotherapy in Advanced Non-small-cell Lung Cancer
AKIRA TAKEUCHI, TETSUYA OGURI, SATOSHI FUKUDA, KAZUKI SONE, YUSUKE KAGAWA, TAKEHIRO UEMURA, OSAMU TAKAKUWA, KEN MAENO, KENSUKE FUKUMITSU, YOSHIHIRO KANEMITSU, TOMOKO TAJIRI, HIROTSUGU OHKUBO, MASAYA TAKEMURA, YUTAKA ITO, AKIO NIIMI
Anticancer Research Aug 2020, 40 (8) 4245-4251; DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.14426

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Variants of SLC22A16 Predict the Efficacy of Platinum Combination Chemotherapy in Advanced Non-small-cell Lung Cancer
AKIRA TAKEUCHI, TETSUYA OGURI, SATOSHI FUKUDA, KAZUKI SONE, YUSUKE KAGAWA, TAKEHIRO UEMURA, OSAMU TAKAKUWA, KEN MAENO, KENSUKE FUKUMITSU, YOSHIHIRO KANEMITSU, TOMOKO TAJIRI, HIROTSUGU OHKUBO, MASAYA TAKEMURA, YUTAKA ITO, AKIO NIIMI
Anticancer Research Aug 2020, 40 (8) 4245-4251; DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.14426
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Patients and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

  • Emerging Roles of the Human Solute Carrier 22 Family
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Impact of Biopsy Diagnostic Methods on the Prognosis of Stage I Endometrioid Cancer
  • Comparison of D2 and Non-D2 Lymphadenectomy in Older Patients (≥75 years) Undergoing Minimally Invasive Distal Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Propensity Score-matched Analysis
  • Clinicopathological Characteristics and Clinical Course of Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Secondary to Radical Nephroureterectomy
Show more Clinical Studies

Keywords

  • SLC22A16
  • rs714368
  • biomarker
  • cytotoxic chemotherapy
Anticancer Research

© 2026 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire