Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleClinical Studies

Is Low Inferior Mesenteric Artery Ligation Worthwhile to Prevent Urinary and Sexual Dysfunction After Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer?

ENRICO FIORI, DANIELE CROCETTI, ANTONIETTA LAMAZZA, FRANCESCA DE FELICE, ANTONIO V. STERPETTI, LUIGI IRACE, ANDREA MINGOLI, PAOLO SAPIENZA and GIORGIO DE TOMA
Anticancer Research August 2020, 40 (8) 4223-4228; DOI: https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.14423
ENRICO FIORI
1Department of Surgery “Pietro Valdoni”, “Sapienza” University of Rome, Rome, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DANIELE CROCETTI
1Department of Surgery “Pietro Valdoni”, “Sapienza” University of Rome, Rome, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: danielecrocetti{at}hotmail.it
ANTONIETTA LAMAZZA
1Department of Surgery “Pietro Valdoni”, “Sapienza” University of Rome, Rome, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
FRANCESCA DE FELICE
2Department of Radiology, Radiotherapy, Oncology and Pathology, “Sapienza” University of Rome, Rome, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
ANTONIO V. STERPETTI
1Department of Surgery “Pietro Valdoni”, “Sapienza” University of Rome, Rome, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
LUIGI IRACE
3Department of Surgery “Paride Stefanini”, “Sapienza” University of Rome, Rome, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
ANDREA MINGOLI
1Department of Surgery “Pietro Valdoni”, “Sapienza” University of Rome, Rome, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
PAOLO SAPIENZA
1Department of Surgery “Pietro Valdoni”, “Sapienza” University of Rome, Rome, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
GIORGIO DE TOMA
1Department of Surgery “Pietro Valdoni”, “Sapienza” University of Rome, Rome, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background/Aim: We studied the role of high or low inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) tie on defecatory, sexual and urinary dysfunctions in patients who underwent laparoscopic TME for early rectal cancer. Patients and Methods: Forty-six consecutive patients undergoing curative laparoscopic resection for pT2N0M0, rectal adenocarcinoma from February 2013 to March 2019 were enrolled into this prospective randomized open label parallel trial to have a laparoscopic TME with a high (Group 1) or low IMA ligation (Group 2). Demographic data and information on symptoms and comorbidity, intra- and post-operative outcomes and defecatory, sexual and urinary functions before and after surgery according to the validated International quality of life questionnaires. Results: A significant difference in postoperative total score of FIQL scale, Jorge-Wexner incontinence score and Agachan-Wexner constipation score were observed between the high and low tie groups at 1, 6, and 12 months after surgery. ICIQ-UI short form, FSFI, and IIEF demonstrated at 1, 6 and 12 months, the scores were significantly higher for patients of Group 1 as compared to those of Group 2. Conclusion: A low IMA ligation permits a better fecal continence, less abdominal pain, and less genito-urinary and sexual dysfunctions in patients submitted to TME for rectal cancer.

  • Urinary dysfunction
  • sexual dysfunction
  • high inferior mesenteric artery tie
  • low inferior mesenteric artery tie
  • rectal cancer

Urinary, sexual and defecatory functional disorders are often related to total mesorectal excision (TME) performed during anterior rectal resection for rectal cancer, thus significantly impairing the quality of life (QoL) of the patients (1, 2). At present, rectal surgery should include R0 resection, appropriate lymphadenectomy, low incidence of anastomotic leakage and sphincter preservation after preoperative or postoperative pelvic radiotherapy. Previous studies have shown that sexual and urinary dysfunction due to pelvic nerve injury after surgery and pelvic radiotherapy can have a significant impact on patients' quality of life (QoL) (3). Moreover, the position of arterial ligation during laparoscopic anterior rectal resection with total mesorectal excision can affect genito-urinary and bowel functions, oncological outcomes, and incidence of anastomotic leakage. Rectal resection for cancer can be performed either by tying the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) at its origin (high tie) or just below the left colic artery (LCA) (low tie). Recent metanalyses (4, 5) focused on morbidity, mortality, disease-free interval and long-term survival rates demonstrated that the level of IMA ligation does not affect oncological outcomes and showed that LCA preservation can be successful in decreasing the incidence of anastomotic leakage (6-8). Furthermore, during dissection maneuvers, an injury of the superior hypogastric plexus may be provoked more frequently when the IMA is tied at its origin, thus determining an alteration of the defecatory functions (9, 10). In the present prospective randomized open label trial, we aimed to study the role of high or low IMA tie on defecatory, sexual and urinary dysfunctions in patients who underwent laparoscopic TME for early rectal cancer without neoadjuvant radiation therapy.

Patients and Methods

Forty-six consecutive patients undergoing curative laparoscopic resection for pT2N0M0 (Stage I) (11), rectal adenocarcinoma at our Institution from February 2013 to March 2019 were enrolled into this prospective randomized open label parallel trial to have a laparoscopic TME with a high or low IMA ligation.

Patients' data were carried out according to the principles laid down in the Declaration of Helsinki and a formal ethic approval from our Institutional Research Committee was obtained. The protocol was properly registered at a public trial registry, www.clinicaltrials.gov (Trial identifier NCT03451643). A written informed consent for the treatment and the analysis of data for scientific purpose was obtained from all patients.

Demographic data and information on symptoms and comorbidity, intra- and post-operative outcomes and defecatory, sexual and urinary functions before and after surgery according to the following scales: Fecal incontinence quality of life (FIQL) scale (12), Jorge-Wexner incontinence (13), Agachan-Wexner constipation (14) scores, international consultation on incontinence questionnaire urinary incontinence short form (ICIQ-UI Short Form) (15), female sexual function index (FSFI) (16) and international index of erectile function (IIEF) (17), were collected into a computerized database. These questionnaires were administered before treatment and thereafter at 1, 6 and 12 months. Comorbidities were defined as follows: specific rectal cancer familiarity, active smoking, anamnestic cardiac disease (prior myocardial infarction, stable or unstable angina, or ST segment alteration on electrocardiogram), hypertension (diastolic blood pressure, ≥85 mmHg), renal disease (blood urea nitrogen, >7.1 mmol/l; creatinine level, >266 μmol/l; creatinine clearance, <50 ml/min), pulmonary disease (PO2, < 60 mmHg; PCO2, > 50 mmHg; pulmonary function tests, <80% of predicted; tested with arterial blood gas test and spirometry), and obesity (body mass index BMI – kg/m2 >20% of ideal).

Serum samples [carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), tissue polypeptide specific antigen (TPA), and carbohydrate antigen (Ca) 19-9] were obtained by direct venipuncture on an antecubital vein of the arm at patient's admission to hospital before surgery.

Criteria for exclusion were T1, T3 and T4 rectal cancer or N+ rectal cancer, neoadjuvant/adjuvant radio-chemotherapy, rectal cancer lower than 5 cm, emergent surgery or previous stenting for rectal obstruction, metastatic disease and laparotomic approach or conversion to laparotomy, history of sexual or urinary dysfunction.

According to the type of surgical treatment, the patients were assigned into two groups: Group 1, high IMA tie, (n=22) and Group 2, low IMA tie (n=24).

Preoperative work-up evaluation consisted of endoscopy with biopsy, endorectal ultrasound, whole body contrast enhanced computed tomography (CT)-scan, pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and blood samples. Preoperative tumor stage (TNM classification designated by American Joint Committee on Cancer) (11), comorbidities and the physical status class according to the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) (18) classification system were reported (Table I). Mean operation time, number of lymph nodes excised, postoperative complications, according to Clavien-Dindo classification (19), pathological tumor stage and number of positive lymph nodes at the origin of IMA were also reported.

FIQL scale. A total of 29 items make the FIQL scale (12). These items form four domains: Lifestyle (10 items), Copying/Behavior (9 items), Depression/Self-Perception (7 items), and Embarrassment (3 items). The highest overall score is 119, whereas for individual domains are 40 for lifestyle, 36 for copying/behavior, 31 for depression/self-perception and 12 for embarrassment domain. Lower score corresponds to a compromised quality of life whereas higher scores corresponds to a better quality of life.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

Patients demographics, comorbidities, plasma level of tumor markers according to ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery at its origin (high tie) or immediately below the left colic artery (low tie) during curative laparoscopic resection for stage IIA rectal cancer.

Jorge-Wexner incontinence score. Jorge-Wexner scoring system (13) cross-tabulates frequencies and different anal incontinence presentations (Gas/Liquid/Solid/Pad use/Need for lifestyle alterations) and sums the returned score to a total of 0-20 (where 0=perfect continence and 20=complete incontinence). In this scoring system, each of the incontinence presentations is graded equally. No psychometric items are included, other than the non-specific ‘Lifestyle Alterations’ item.

Agachan-Wexner constipation score. Agachan-Wexner constipation score (14) explores the following areas of investigations: 1-frequency of bowel movements; 2-difficulty: painful evacuation effort; 3-completeness: feeling incomplete evacuation; 4-pain: abdominal pain; 5-time: min in lavatory per attempt; 6-assistance: type of assistance; 7-failure: unsuccessful attempts for evacuation per 24 h; 8-history: duration of constipation (years). Based on the questionnaire, scores ranged from 0 to 30, with 0 indicating normal bowel function and 30 indicating severe constipation.

ICIQ-UI short form. The aim of ICIQ (15) is to assess urinary incontinence and its impact on quality of life (QoL). The ICIQ-UI Short Form is a brief and psychometrically robust patient-completed questionnaire for evaluating the frequency, severity and impact on quality of life (QoL) of urinary incontinence in men and women in research and clinical practice across the world. It is scored on a scale from 0-21. The ICIQ-UI Short Form provides a brief and robust measure to assess the impact of symptoms of incontinence on outcome.

Sexual function questionnaire. Female sexual function was evaluated with the FSFI (16) and male sexual function with the IIEF (17). FSFI assesses different domains of sexual female function (desire, arousal, lubrication, orgasm, satisfaction and pain). The FSFI is a 19-item questionnaire with a total score ranging from 2 to 36 points. The IIEF is a multidimensional scale, which addresses the most relevant aspects of male sexual function, such as erectile strength, orgasm, desire, satisfaction with intercourse, and overall satisfaction. The IIEF is a 19-item questionnaire with a total score ranging from 5 to 75 points. Lower scores indicate for both scales a decreased sexual function.

Surgical technique. Briefly, standard laparoscopic anterior rectal resection was performed as previously reported (6, 7, 20, 21). In group 1 the high IMA ligation was gained through a medial access after the section of the inferior mesenteric vein. After the identification of the IMA root, it was divided, and the left colon mobilized using, in all cases, the Harmonic Focus device (Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Johnson & Johnson Inc, NJ, USA) to reduce bleeding (22). Total mesorectal excision was always performed. After rectum division, the rectum was exteriorized through a mini-Pfannestiel incision, resected and then stapled with a colorectal end-to-side anastomosis. A similar approach was used for patients of group 2, however, the low IMA ligation was performed after the identification and preservation of the LCA. The surgical techniques were successfully completed in all cases with an oncologic radical resection.

Statistical analysis. Our data were inserted into a computer software program (SPSS Ver. 25.0.0.1; SPSS Chicago, IL, USA for MacOS High Sierra ver. 10.13.4, Apple Inc., Cupertino, CA, USA) and statistically analyzed. Non-parametric tests were used because of the sample sizes. Continuous variables were analyzed with the Mann-Whitney U-test with the 95% confidence interval reported for the size of the effect, i.e. the difference between mean values (CIΔ). Categorical variables were studied with the Chi-square test or the Fisher's exact test. Data were expressed as mean±standard deviation, median, interquartile range (IQR) and mode because of the heterogeneity of the sample. Actuarial survival rate and disease-free interval were assessed by the Kaplan-Meier method at 5-years. Standard error (SE) of survival rates and disease-free interval were estimated at each censored case. Differences with α-level of <0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

Demographics and clinical findings. Twenty-six (56%) were males and 20 (44%) females (mean age 68 ± 10 years; range=39-84 years; median=69.5 years; IQR=13 years; mode=78 years). Table I gives the demographic, comorbidities, plasma level of tumor markers, and ASA showing no significant differences between the two groups.

Early results. No postoperative mortality and major complications within 30 days were observed. Three (6%) minor complications were observed. One patient in Group 1 had superficial wound infection of the mini-Pfannestiel, which resolved with medication; and 2 in Group 2 (1 acute urinary retention and 1 superficial antecubital arm vein phlebitis). Oral feeding was resumed on the first or second postoperative day by all patients with no statistical differences between the two groups (p=0.873). The overall length of stay was 7±2 days (range=5-11 days; median=7 days; mode=7 days, IQR=2 days) and no statistical differences were recorded among the two groups (p=0.213).

Long-term results. No patients were lost to follow-up (mean 40±21 months; median=39.5; months; range=5-72 months; mode=55 months, IQR=30 months). No patients underwent adjuvant treatment. The 5-year survival rate was 91% (SE=0.5) and disease-free rate was 81% (SE=0.7). No differences were recorded among the two groups (p=0.462 and p=0.896, respectively).

Defecatory, urinary and sexual function outcome. All patients completed the questionnaires. The social and educational status, the lifestyle habits (defined as active or sedentary) of our population were similar for both groups. Thirty-five (76%) completed a basic education (up to secondary), while 11 (24%) had college or master's degree. A similar social status was observed: 37 (80%) patients were retired from work, and 9 (20%) were active (6 were manual workers and 3 were employees). Seventeen (37%) had an active lifestyle and 29 (63%) a sedentary one.

FIQL score. Preoperatively, the score was similar among the two groups (Group 1: 101±6; Group 2: 102±7; p=0.662; 95%CIΔ=−3.118-4.951). A significant difference in the total score was observed at 1 month (87±6 and 94±7, respectively; p=0.001; 95% CIΔ=2.892-11.047), 6 months (92±8 and 98±6, respectively; p=0.006; 95%CIΔ=1.868-10.495), and 12 months after surgery (92±5 and 95±5, respectively; p=0.024; 95% CIΔ=0.473-6.262). The scores were significantly lower for patients of Group 1 when compared to those of Group 2 for each domain.

Jorge–Wexner incontinence score. No preoperative differences were recorded among Group 1 and 2 (0.4±0.5 and 0.2±0.4, respectively; p=0.256; 95%CIΔ=−0.428-0.117). At 1, 6 and 12 months, the scores showed a significant decrease in patients of Group 1 (0.6±0.8, 0.7±0.8, and 0.6±0.9 respectively) when compared to those of Group 2 (0.2±0.4, 0.2±0.4, and 0.1±0.3 respectively) (p=0.017; 95%CIΔ=−8.49- −0.091; p=0.013; 95%CIΔ=−0.914- −0.116; and p=0.019; 95%CIΔ=−0.931- −0.092, respectively).

Agachan–Wexner constipation score. No differences were observed preoperatively among the two groups (Group 1: 6±1 and Group 2: 6±1; p=0.437; 95%CIΔ=−0.906-0.398). At 1, 6 and 12 months, the scores were significantly higher for patients of Group 1 when compared to those of Group 2 (5±1 and 4±1, p=0.002; 95%CIΔ=−1.720- −0.424; 8±1 and 6±1, p=0.001; 95%CIΔ=−2.489- −0.913, and 8±1 and 6±1, p=0.001; 95%CIΔ=−2.626- −1.291, respectively).

ICIQ-UI short form. No statistical differences were observed preoperatively (Group 1: 0.4±1 and Group 2: 0.5±1; p=0.809; 95%CIΔ=−0.636-0.811). At 1, 6 and 12 months, the scores were significantly higher for patients of Group 1 as compared to those of Group 2 (2±2 and 0.5±1, p=0.0025; 95%CIΔ=−2.593- −0.505; 2±2 and 0.5±1, p=0.002; 95%CIΔ=−2.466- −0.618, and 2±2 and 0.6±1, p=0.018; 95% CIΔ=−2.084- −0.204, respectively).

FSFI. No statistical differences were observed preoperatively (Group 1: 19±3 and Group 2: 18±3; p=0.839; 95%CIΔ=−3.143-2.583). At 1, 6 and 12 months, the scores were significantly lower for patients of Group 1 as compared to those of Group 2 (11±3 and 17±4, p=0.001; 95% CIΔ=3.315-10.085; 12±3 and 17±4, p=0.007; 95% CIΔ=1.465-7.935, and 13±3 and 18±3, p=0.002; 95% CIΔ=2.022-7.778, respectively).

IIEF. No statistical differences were observed preoperatively (Group 1: 42±16 and Group 2: 43±19; p=0.894; 95%CIΔ=−13.199-15.032). At 1, 6 and 12 months, the scores were significantly lower for patients of Group 1 as compared to those of Group 2 (27±11 and 39±17, p=0.036; 95%CIΔ=0.878-24.122; 28±11 and 40±18, p=0.048; 95%CIΔ=0.134-24.319, and 28±11 and 40±18, p=0.041; 95%CIΔ=0.541-24.864, respectively).

Discussion

Although TME, radio- and chemotherapy have greatly improved the survival rates of patients affected with rectal cancer, they represent two known factors negatively influencing defecatory, urinary and sexual function. Specifically, from one side, the combination of neoadjuvant radiotherapy followed by TME with nerve sparing, permits an extremely low local recurrence (<5%) and high 5-year survival rates (80%) (23), to the other, a defecatory, urinary and sexual impairment, is recorded from 5 to 40% of the patients (24, 25). Specifically, the rate of urinary dysfunction (i.e. urinary incontinence, difficulty in voiding or neurogenic bladder), reported in the current literature, reaches 30% (25), whereas sexual dysfunctions (i.e. erectile dysfunction and ejaculation problems in men and decreased vaginal lubrication, dyspareunia and difficulty reaching orgasm in women) are reported in more than 50% of the patients (24, 25). On the other hand, in men, radiotherapy causes an obliterative endarteritis of the penile bulb small blood vessels, which reduces blood flow and impairs erectile function, whereas, in females, determines a persistent detrimental effect on the vaginal mucosa impacting negatively on sexual function (24). Although preoperative chemo-radiation therapy or adjuvant chemotherapy deteriorate the defecatory, urinary and sexual functions, the most important factor influencing these occurrences is an intraoperative nerve damage because of a lack of anatomical knowledge or poor visualization of the pelvic nerve fibers (26). Therefore, an improvement of the surgical technique and pelvic radiotherapy fields may, at least theoretically, reduce the incidence of these complications (27-29). In particular, the introduction in clinical practice of a standardized technique for TME performed with a minimally invasive approach have significantly improved surgical visibility, thus helping in recognizing the abdominal and pelvic nerves (24). Their recognition, more easily accomplished with this approach, seems, in fact, to permit a significant reduction in these dysfunctions when compared to conventional open surgery (1, 23, 30).

In our study, we aimed to investigate the role of high and low IMA ligation and no other confounding factors (i.e. radiation therapy, neoadjuvant chemotherapy and open surgery, benign lesions, emergency setting) (9, 31-35) in the impairment of the defecatory, sexual and urinary function after TME. The ligation of the IMA at its origin may accidentally damage the superior hypogastric plexus, which is interconnected with the inferior hypogastric plexus. The regulation of normal defecatory, sexual and urinary function depends, in fact, on sympathetic and parasympathetic nerve supply originating from the superior and inferior hypogastric plexus. In our previous study, we demonstrated (9) that a high IMA tie negatively affects the risk of defecatory disturbances because of a denervation of the pre-anastomotic colon with consequent hypomotility, inefficient transport of intestinal contents (contributing to feelings of incomplete evacuation) and retention of upstream colonic gas on the left side causing abdominal pain. Furthermore, an injury to the superior hypogastric plexus and hypogastric nerves may also lead to retrograde ejaculation, incomplete or lack of ejaculation (23, 36). We also observed that patients of Group 1 had a higher incidence of urinary incontinence, seriously impacting their quality of life. We postulated that the urinary involvement is due to interconnections between sympathetic and parasympathetic fibers from the superior and inferior hypogastric plexus.

The total score of FIQL was significantly lower for Group 1 patients when compared to those of Group 2 for each domain, and similar results were obtained with the Jorge-Wexner incontinence score. In particular, the analysis of the questionnaires showed a significant increase in the total score at follow-up in Group 1 patients; but this significance was reached because these patients reported an increase in gas incontinence. Furthermore, the total score of the Agachan-Wexner constipation questionnaire was significantly higher for patients of Group 1 when compared to those of Group 2, because of a loss of propagated contraction waves causing abdominal pain. Furthermore, we showed a better genito-urinary and sexual outcome in patients who underwent a low IMA ligation.

This study has several limitations but also some strengths. This is a single center study with a small number of patients, thus a significant heterogeneity, although unpredictable, might be present, thus limiting our observations. Functional studies, such as anorectal manometry, urodynamic test (i.e. uroflowmetry, flow cystometry, abdominal leak-point pressure), penile dynamic color Doppler ultrasound, nocturnal penile tumescence test, were not performed before and after surgery. Functional studies might improve and confirm the results. Conversely, the strengths of our study were the randomization of our population, the analysis of all spheres of disturbances linked to the denervation of the superior hypogastric plexus, the absence of patients lost to follow-up, and the completeness of all questionnaires with formally validated scales.

In conclusion, our study demonstrated that patients who underwent TME for rectal cancer with a low IMA ligation had a better fecal continence, less abdominal pain, and experienced less genito-urinary and sexual dysfunctions when compared to those having a high IMA ligation. Since no differences in long-term survival and disease-free rates are recorded, we recommend a low IMA ligation to decrease the risk of these complications significantly impairing patients' quality of life.

Footnotes

  • Authors' Contributions

    Enrico Fiori (Conception, design and data collection), Daniele Crocetti (Conception, design and writing the manuscript), Antonietta Lamazza (Data analysis and interpretation of data), Francesca De Felice (Writing the manuscript), Antonio V Sterpetti (Conception and design), Luigi Irace (Interpretation of data), Andrea Mingoli (Interpretation of data), Paolo Sapienza (Conception, design and writing the manuscript), Giorgio De Toma (Conception and design).

  • This article is freely accessible online.

  • Conflicts of Interest

    The Authors have no conflicts of interest to declare regarding this study.

  • Received June 4, 2020.
  • Revision received June 23, 2020.
  • Accepted June 24, 2020.
  • Copyright© 2020, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved

References

  1. ↵
    1. Fiori E,
    2. Lamazza A,
    3. Sterpetti AV,
    4. Crocetti D,
    5. Felice F,
    6. DI Muzio M,
    7. Mingoli A,
    8. Sapienza P,
    9. De Toma G
    : Quality of life for patients with incurable stage IV colorectal cancer: Randomized controlled trial comparing resection versus endoscopic stenting. In Vivo 33(6): 2065-2070, 2019. PMID: 31662539. DOI: 10.21873/invivo.11705
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Kauff DW,
    2. Kronfeld K,
    3. Gorbulev S,
    4. Wachtlin D,
    5. Lang H,
    6. Kneist W
    : Continuous intraoperative monitoring of pelvic autonomic nerves during TME to prevent urogenital and anorectal dysfunction in rectal cancer patients (NEUROS): a randomized controlled trial. BMC Cancer 16: 323, 2016. PMID: 27209237. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-016-2348-4
    OpenUrl
  3. ↵
    1. Kasparek MS,
    2. Hassan I,
    3. Cima RR,
    4. Larson DR,
    5. Gullerud RE,
    6. Wolff BG
    : Long-term quality of life and sexual and urinary function after abdominoperineal resection for distal rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 55(2): 147-154, 2012. PMID: 22228157. DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e31823d2606
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Zeng J,
    2. Su G
    : High ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery during sigmoid colon and rectal cancer surgery increases the risk of anastomotic leakage: a meta-analysis. World J Surg Oncol 16(1): 157, 2018. PMID: 30071856. DOI: 10.1186/s12957-018-1458-7
    OpenUrl
  5. ↵
    1. Fan YC,
    2. Ning FL,
    3. Zhang CD,
    4. Dai DQ
    : Preservation versus non-preservation of left colic artery in sigmoid and rectal cancer surgery: A meta-analysis. Int J Surg 52: 269-277, 2018. PMID: 29501795. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.02.054
    OpenUrl
  6. ↵
    1. Crocetti D,
    2. Cavallaro G,
    3. Tarallo MR,
    4. Chiappini A,
    5. Polistena P,
    6. Sapienza P,
    7. Fiori E,
    8. De Toma G
    : Preservation of left colic artery with lymph node dissection of IMA root during laparoscopic surgery for rectosigmoid cancer. Results of a retrospective analysis. Clin Ter 170(2): e124-e128, 2019. PMID: 30993308. DOI: 10.7417/CT.2019.2121
    OpenUrl
  7. ↵
    1. Polistena A,
    2. Cavallaro G,
    3. D'Ermo G,
    4. Paliotta A,
    5. Crocetti D,
    6. Rosato L,
    7. De Toma G
    : Clinical and surgical aspects of high and low ligation of inferior mesenteric artery in laparoscopic resection for advanced colorectal cancer in elderly patients. Minerva Chir 68(3): 281-288, 2013. PMID: 23774093.
    OpenUrl
  8. ↵
    1. Lamazza A,
    2. Fiori E,
    3. Schillaci A,
    4. Sterpetti AV,
    5. Lezoche E
    : Treatment of anastomotic stenosis and leakage after colorectal resection for cancer with self-expandable metal stents. Am J Surg 208(3): 465-469, 2014. PMID: 24560186. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.09.032
    OpenUrl
  9. ↵
    1. Fiori E,
    2. Crocetti D,
    3. Lamazza A,
    4. De Felice F,
    5. Burrelli Scotti G,
    6. Sterpetti AV,
    7. Mingoli A,
    8. Sapienza P,
    9. De Toma G
    : Defecatory dysfunction after colon cancer resection: the role of inferior mesenteric artery tie. Anticancer Res 40(5): 2969-2974, 2020. PMID: 32366450. DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.14276
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. Mari G,
    2. Maggioni D,
    3. Costanzi A,
    4. Miranda A,
    5. Rigamonti L,
    6. Crippa J,
    7. Magistro C,
    8. Di Lernia S,
    9. Forgione A,
    10. Carnevali P,
    11. Nichelatti M,
    12. Carzaniga P,
    13. Valenti F,
    14. Rovagnati M,
    15. Berselli M,
    16. Cocozza E,
    17. Livraghi L,
    18. Origi M,
    19. Scandroglio I,
    20. Roscio F,
    21. De Luca A,
    22. Ferrari G,
    23. Pugliese R
    : High or low inferior mesenteric artery ligation in laparoscopic low anterior resection: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial (HIGHLOW trial). Trials 16: 21, 2015. PMID: 25623323. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-014-0537-5
    OpenUrl
  11. ↵
    1. Brierley J,
    2. Gospodarowicz M,
    3. Wittekind Ch
    : TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours. Eighth Edition. Chichester, West Sussex, UK: Wiley Blackwell; 2017.
  12. ↵
    1. Altomare DF,
    2. Rinaldi M,
    3. Giardiello GG,
    4. Donelli A,
    5. Petrolino M,
    6. Villani RD,
    7. Masin A,
    8. Melega E,
    9. Ratto C,
    10. Memeo V
    : Italian translation and prospective validation of fecal incontinence quality of life (FIQL) index. Chir Ital 57(2): 153-158, 2005. PMID: 15916140.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Jorge JM,
    2. Wexner SD
    : Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 36(1): 77-97, 1993. PMID: 8416784. DOI: 10.1007/bf02050307
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Agachan F,
    2. Chen T,
    3. Pfeifer J,
    4. Reissman P,
    5. Wexner S
    : A constipation scoring system to simplify evaluation and management of constipated patients. Dis Colon Rectum 39(6): 681-685, 1996. PMID: 8646957. DOI: 10.1007/bf02056950
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Avery K,
    2. Donovan J,
    3. Peters TJ,
    4. Shaw C,
    5. Gotoh M,
    6. Abrams P
    : ICIQ: a brief and robust measure for evaluating the symptoms and impact of urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn 23(4): 322-330, 2004. PMID: 15227649. DOI: 10.1002/nau.20041
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Rosen R,
    2. Brown C,
    3. Heiman J,
    4. Leiblum S,
    5. Meston C,
    6. Shabsigh R,
    7. Ferguson D,
    8. D'Agostino R Jr..
    : The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI): a multidimensional self-report instrument for assessement of female sexual function. J Sex Marital Ther 26(2): 191-208, 2000. PMID: 10782451. DOI: 10.1080/009262300278597
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Rosen RC,
    2. Riley A,
    3. Mishra A,
    4. Osterloh IH,
    5. Kirkpatrick J,
    6. Mishra A
    : The International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF): a multidimensional scale for assessment of erectile dysfunction. Urology 49(6): 822-830, 1997. PMID: 9187685. DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(97)00238-0
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Doyle DJ,
    2. Garmon EH
    : American Society of Anesthesiologists Classification (ASA Class). Treasure Island (FL): Stat Pearls Publishing, 2019. PMID: 28722969.
  19. ↵
    1. Dindo D,
    2. Demartines N,
    3. Clavien PA
    : Classification of surgical complications: A new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2): 205-213, 2004. PMID: 15273542. DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Crocetti D,
    2. Sapienza P,
    3. Pedullà G,
    4. De Toma G
    : Reducing the risk of trocar site hernias. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 96(7): 558, 2014. PMID: 25245752. DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2014.96.7.558
    OpenUrl
  21. ↵
    1. Cisano C,
    2. Sapienza P,
    3. Crocetti D,
    4. De Toma G
    : Z-entry technique reduces the risk of trocar-site hernias in obese patients. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 98(5): 340-341, 2016. PMID: 27087329. DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2016.0114
    OpenUrl
  22. ↵
    1. Cavallaro G,
    2. Polistena A,
    3. D'Ermo G,
    4. Basile U,
    5. Orlando G,
    6. Pedullà G,
    7. Avenia N,
    8. De Toma G
    : Usefulness of harmonic focus during axillary lymph node dissection: A prospective study. Surg Innov 18(3): 231-234, 2011. PMID: 21307015. DOI: 10.1177/1553350610397215
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Nagpal K,
    2. Bennett N
    : Colorectal surgery and its impact on male sexual function. Curr Urol Rep 14: 279-284, 2013. PMID: 23716030. DOI: 10.1007/s11934-013-0341-x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Moszkowicz D,
    2. Alsaid B,
    3. Bessede T,
    4. Penna C,
    5. Nordlinger B,
    6. Benoît G,
    7. Peschaud F
    : Where does pelvic nerve injury occur during rectal surgery for cancer? Colorectal Dis 13(12): 1326-1334, 2011. PMID: 20718836. DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2010.02384.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Pallisera-Lloveras A,
    2. Planelles-Soler P,
    3. Hannaoui N,
    4. Mora-López L,
    5. Muñoz-Rodriguez J,
    6. Serra-Pla S,
    7. Dominguez-Garcia A,
    8. Prats-López J,
    9. Navarro-Soto S,
    10. Serra-Aracil X,
    11. Tauli-Colorectal Cancer Study Group
    : Dissection of the inferior mesenteric vein versus of the inferior mesenteric artery for the genitourinary function after laparoscopic approach of rectal cancer surgery: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Urol 19(1): 75, 2019. PMID: 31382934. DOI: 10.1186/s12894-019-0501-5
    OpenUrl
  26. ↵
    1. Kim NK,
    2. Kim YW,
    3. Cho MS
    : Total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer with emphasis on pelvic autonomic nerve preservation: Expert technical tips for robotic surgery. Surg Oncol 24(3): 172-180, 2015. PMID: 26141555. DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2015.06.012
    OpenUrl
  27. ↵
    1. Incrocci L,
    2. Jensen PT
    : Pelvic radiotherapy and sexual function in men and women. J Sex Med 10(1): 53-64, 2013. PMID: 23387912. DOI: 10.1111/jsm.12010
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. De Felice F,
    2. Crocetti D,
    3. Maiuri V,
    4. Parisi M,
    5. Marampon F,
    6. Izzo L,
    7. De Toma G,
    8. Musio D,
    9. Tombolini V
    : Locally advanced rectal cancer: treatment approach in elderly patients. Curr Treat Options Oncol 21(1): 1, 2020. PMID: 31927649. DOI: 10.1007/s11864-019-0692-8
    OpenUrl
  28. ↵
    1. De Felice F,
    2. Crocetti D,
    3. Parisi M,
    4. Maiuri V,
    5. Moscarelli E,
    6. Caiazzo R,
    7. Bulzonetti N,
    8. Musio D,
    9. Tombolini V
    : Decision tree algorithm in locally advanced rectal cancer: an example of over-interpretation and misuse of a machine learning approach. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 146(3): 761-765, 2020. PMID: 31784835. DOI: 10.1007/s00432-019-03102-y
    OpenUrl
  29. ↵
    1. Fiori E,
    2. Crocetti D,
    3. Lamazza A,
    4. De Felice F,
    5. Tarallo M,
    6. Sterpetti AV,
    7. Mingoli A,
    8. Sapienza P,
    9. De Toma G
    : Resection or stenting in the treatment of symptomatic advanced metastatic rectal cancer: a dilemma. Anticancer Res 39(12): 6781-6786, 2019. PMID: 31810943. DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.13893
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. ↵
    1. Tebala GD,
    2. Mingoli A,
    3. Natili A,
    4. Khan AQ,
    5. Brachini G
    : Surgical risk and pathological results of emergency resection in the treatment of acutely obstructing colorectal cancers: A retrospective cohort study. Ann Coloproctol, 2020. PMID: 32178504. DOI: 10.3393/ac.2019.03.10.1
    1. Tebala GD,
    2. Natili A,
    3. Gallucci A,
    4. Brachini G,
    5. Khan AQ,
    6. Tebala D,
    7. Mingoli A
    : Emergency treatment of complicated colorectal cancer. Cancer Manag Res 10: 827-838, 2018. PMID: 29719419. DOI: 10.2147/CMAR.S158335
    OpenUrl
    1. Crocetti D,
    2. Sapienza P,
    3. Sterpetti AV,
    4. Paliotta A,
    5. DE Gori A,
    6. Pedullà G,
    7. de Toma G
    : Surgery for symptomatic colon lipoma: a systematic review of the literature. Anticancer Res 34(11): 6271-6276, 2014. PMID: 25368224.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Alimonti A,
    2. Bocca A,
    3. Lamazza A,
    4. Forte G,
    5. Rahimi S,
    6. Mattei D,
    7. Fiori E,
    8. Iacomino M,
    9. Schillaci A,
    10. De Masi E,
    11. Pino A
    : A study on metals content in patients with colorectal polyps. J Toxicol Environ Health A 71(5): 342-347, 2008. PMID: 18214808. DOI: 10.1080/15287390701839133
    OpenUrlPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Fiori E,
    2. Pozzessere C,
    3. Lamazza A,
    4. Leone G,
    5. Borrini F,
    6. Schillaci A,
    7. Mingazzini P
    : Endoscopic treatment of ganglioneuroma of the colon associated with a lipoma: a case report. J Med Case Rep 6(1): 304, 2012. PMID: 22978818. DOI: 10.1186/1752-1947-6-304
    OpenUrl
  32. ↵
    1. Kasparek MS,
    2. Hassan I,
    3. Cima RR,
    4. Larson DR,
    5. Gullerud RE,
    6. Wolff BG
    : Long-term quality of life and sexual and urinary function after abdominoperineal resection for distal rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 55(2): 147-154, 2012. PMID: 22228157. DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e31823d2606
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research
Vol. 40, Issue 8
August 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Is Low Inferior Mesenteric Artery Ligation Worthwhile to Prevent Urinary and Sexual Dysfunction After Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
9 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Is Low Inferior Mesenteric Artery Ligation Worthwhile to Prevent Urinary and Sexual Dysfunction After Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer?
ENRICO FIORI, DANIELE CROCETTI, ANTONIETTA LAMAZZA, FRANCESCA DE FELICE, ANTONIO V. STERPETTI, LUIGI IRACE, ANDREA MINGOLI, PAOLO SAPIENZA, GIORGIO DE TOMA
Anticancer Research Aug 2020, 40 (8) 4223-4228; DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.14423

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Is Low Inferior Mesenteric Artery Ligation Worthwhile to Prevent Urinary and Sexual Dysfunction After Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer?
ENRICO FIORI, DANIELE CROCETTI, ANTONIETTA LAMAZZA, FRANCESCA DE FELICE, ANTONIO V. STERPETTI, LUIGI IRACE, ANDREA MINGOLI, PAOLO SAPIENZA, GIORGIO DE TOMA
Anticancer Research Aug 2020, 40 (8) 4223-4228; DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.14423
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Patients and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

  • Colon or Rectal Stent Positioning for Advanced Cancer Influences Quality of Life: A Critical Point of View
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Impact of Biopsy Diagnostic Methods on the Prognosis of Stage I Endometrioid Cancer
  • Comparison of D2 and Non-D2 Lymphadenectomy in Older Patients (≥75 years) Undergoing Minimally Invasive Distal Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Propensity Score-matched Analysis
  • Clinicopathological Characteristics and Clinical Course of Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Secondary to Radical Nephroureterectomy
Show more Clinical Studies

Keywords

  • Urinary dysfunction
  • sexual dysfunction
  • high inferior mesenteric artery tie
  • low inferior mesenteric artery tie
  • rectal cancer
Anticancer Research

© 2026 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire