Abstract
Background/Aim: Canine B-cell lymphoma represents a useful in vivo model for human diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Pan-Bromodomain and extra-terminal (BET) inhibition targeting BRD2/3/4 and selective inhibition of BRD4, as well as spleen tyrosine kinase (SYK) inhibition, are currently evaluated as haematologic cancer therapy. Herein, we characterized the differences in the biologic response of isoform-specific or pan-BET inhibition alone or in combination with SYK inhibition. Materials and Methods: I-BET151 (pan-inhibitor) and AZD5153 (BRD4 inhibitor) were combined with Entospletinib (SYK inhibitor) and comparatively analysed in the canine DLBCL cell line CLBL-1. Dose- and time-dependent cellular responses were analysed by cell number, metabolic activity, apoptosis/necrosis, and cell morphology. The synergistic potential was evaluated through the Bliss independence model. Results: I-BET151 and AZD5153 showed significant dose- and time-dependent inhibitory effects. Adding Entospletinib to I-BET151 or AZD5153 had no additional synergistic effects. Conclusion: Entospletinib did not enhance the inhibitory effects of the pan- or isoform-specific BET.
Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is one of the most common non-Hodgkin lymphomas in humans and dogs. Canine DLBCL shares many characteristics in terms of biology, treatment, and outcome with human DLBCL (1, 2). Further, counterparts of the common human DLBCL subtypes “germinal centre B-cell like” (GCB-DLBCL) and “activated B-cell like” can also be found in dogs but without clinical differences (3). Canine DLBCL is treated mainly with CHOP (cyclophosphamide, hydroxydaunorubicin, vincristine, prednisolone) (3, 4). Although 85–90 % of canine patients respond to treatment, almost in all cases the disease relapses and becomes resistant to therapy with a median survival time of 10-14 months (5).
In humans, the B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL2) gene is located human chromosome 18 (HSA18) and the immunoglobulin (IG) locus on HSA14. Under normal conditions, BCL2 protein is absent in most germinal centre B cells. In around 30% of human GCB-DLBCL, a translocation t(14;18) is present, bringing BCL2 exons under the control of IG locus leading to an ectopic BCL2 expression (6). Further, the IG locus also acts as a translocation partner of MYC (HSA8) resulting in a t(8;14) also causing MYC overexpression (7). In 5-10% of cases, human DLBCL shows chromosomal translocation affecting MYC and BCL2 without causing fusion transcripts. This “double-hit” lymphoma molecular subtype can also be caused in the absence of chromosomal translocation through BCL2 amplification, activation of NF-kB transcription complex, and MYC amplification (8). In general, the “double-hit” molecular subtype shows poor outcomes with standard DLBCL chemotherapy (Rituximab +CHOP) and an aggressive course (9).
In canine DLBCL, BCL2 and MYC expression can be observed showing comparable patterns to their human “double hit” lymphoma counterpart. However, immunohistochemical analyses showed that BCL2 and MYC were not able to predict clinical outcome in dogs presenting an aggressive disease course (10).
In humans MYC akin to STAT, GATA, and NF-kB (11) have been described to interact with the family of Bromodomain and extra-terminal (BET) proteins. The BET protein family including Bromodomain-containing protein 2 (BRD2), Bromodomain-containing protein 3 (BRD3), Bromodomain-containing protein 4 (BRD4), and Bromodomain testis-specific protein (BRDT) (12) act as epigenetic “readers”, identifying acetylated lysine on histones and recruiting transcriptional regulatory complexes (13). Their function is critical for adequate gene expression and cell cycle progression. The role of BET proteins in haematological malignancies has been confirmed by multiple selective inhibitors in lymphoma, leukaemia and multiple myeloma (14). To this date, there are no FDA approved BET inhibitors, but there are several ongoing clinical trials in different settings. Their ability to disrupt MYC function makes them an appealing target in DLBCL patients, both human and canine. Accordingly, pan-BET inhibitors targeting BRD2/3/4 (as I-BET151, OTX015, I-BET762, ABBV-075) and selective inhibitors targeting BRD4 (as AZD5153, CPI-0610, ABBV-744) have been tested in preclinical models and clinical trials against haematologic and solid cancers. I-BET151 (GSK1210151A) is a pan-BET inhibitor for BRD2, BRD3, BRD4 that binds BRD4 monovalently (15). AZD5153 is an isoform-specific BET inhibitor for BRD4 that markedly disrupts transcription of MYC, E2F and mTOR pathways (16). It is the first BET inhibitor to bind bivalently and ligate two bromodomains in BRD4 simultaneously (16). Transcriptome data from canine DLBCL shows overexpression of MYC (17) and it has been reported that the pan-BET inhibitor OTX015 targeting BRD4 monovalently blocks proliferation of CLBL-1 cells (18).
Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are therapeutic agents that target specifically a key kinase in a designated molecular pathway. In the case of lymphomas, this allows targeting specific proteins of the pathologically up-regulated pathways, as the BCR pathway (19). SYK appears to function as a prosurvival factor of pre-B cells in canine DLBCL (20). Novel agents as SYK inhibitors (Entospletinib, Fostamatinib, Cerdulatinib) show promising antineoplastic effects as new treatments of haematological malignancies (21). The selective SYK inhibitor Entospletinib has exhibited different rates of efficacy alone or in combination with other agents in clinical trials but it's not approved for clinical use yet (22, 23). There are currently no clinical trials that evaluate its use in canine DLBCL.
Due to the key roles of SYK and the available data on BET inhibition in different cancers, a combined application appears a potentially promising way to enhance the anti-tumorigenic effect. It has been described that BET and SYK inhibition separately have anti-proliferative effects through MYC regulation (24, 25). MYC, as common effector between the two pathways, classifies the combination of a BET inhibitor with a SYK inhibitor as especially appealing. Further, a direct comparison between a pan- and specific-BET inhibitor could bear significant value in terms of latter side effect reduction. In the present study, we investigated the anti-proliferation effects of a pan-BET inhibitor (I-BET151), a selective-bivalent BRD4 BET inhibitor (AZD5153), and a SYK inhibitor (Entospletinib) in a canine DLBCL in vitro model (CLBL-1). Furthermore, we investigated whether the combination of Entospletinib with either I-BET151 or AZD5153 would have additional effects on proliferation inhibition and apoptosis/necrosis induction in CLBL-1.
Materials and Methods
Cell line and cell culture. The canine B-cell lymphoma cell line CLBL-1 was provided by the University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna, Austria. CLBL-1 was derived from a male Bernese mountain dog, which was diagnosed with stage IV diffuse large cell lymphoma. Cells were maintained as suspension cultures in RPMI-1640 medium, supplemented with 20% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum, and 100 U/ml penicillin/0.1 mg/ml streptomycin (Biochrom GmbH, Berlin, Germany) at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2. The doubling time of CLBL-1 has been described earlier to be 31 h (26).
Inhibitors. Entospletinib (Ento), I-BET151 (IBET), and AZD5153 (AZD) were purchased from Selleck Chemicals (Absource Diagnostics GmbH, München, Germany). According to the manufacturer's information, the substances were dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO, Sigma Aldrich Chemie GmbH, Steinheim, Germany). The stock solutions (10 mM) were stored at −80°C and working solutions were freshly prepared.
Mono application of I-BET151, AZD5153, and Entospletinib. Cells were seeded at a density of 0.33×106 cells/ml in 24 and 96-well plates for all cell biologic parameters (proliferation, metabolic activity, and apoptosis/necrosis assay). The cells were separately incubated with serial end-concentrations of I-BET151, AZD5153 (0.001, 0.01, 0.1, 0.5, 1, 2.5, 5, 10 μM) or of Entospletinib (0.001, 0.01, 0.1, 0.5, 1, 3.4, 5, 10 μM) for 24, 48 and 72 h in the mono-application setup. All experiments were performed in at least three biologically independent replicates.
Identification of IC50. According to the number of the living cells for the 72-h group, IC50 values of I-BET151, AZD5153, and Entospletinib were calculated through Graph Pad Prism Version 8.0.2. The concentrations and cell numbers were log-transformed and normalized. Afterwards, nonlinear regression (dose-response-inhibition, log vs. normalized response - variable slope) was used to determine the IC50 values. Concerning the concentrations lower than IC50 values, 0.75 μM I-BET151, 0.05 μM AZD5153, and 1 μM Entospletinib were selected for the combined application setup.
Combined application of BET inhibitors and Entospletinib. In the combined application setup, cells were seeded at a density of 0.33×106 cells/ml in 24- and 96-well plates for all cell biologic parameters (proliferation, metabolic activity, and apoptosis/necrosis assay). For these experiments, the cells were separately incubated with 1 μM Entospletinib, 0.75 μM I-BET151, 0.05 μM AZD5153, and their combinations (Ento+IBET, Ento+AZD) for 72 h. Besides that, the cells treated with the same inhibitor setups for 24, 48, and 72 h, were examined for changes in morphology. In the control groups, the DMSO-containing medium was added in the same volume as to the drug-treated cells. DMSO concentrations of control groups in single and combined applications were both 0.1% (v/v).
Cell counting analysis. CLBL-1 cells were seeded in the 24-well plate, 0.5×106 cells were exposed to inhibitor or vehicle in a total of 1,500 μl per well. After mono- (24, 48, and 72 h) or combined (72 h) inhibitor exposure, cells were harvested and washed by PBS. The viable cell number was assessed by counting with a hemocytometer and trypan blue live-dead staining (Sigma-Aldrich Chemie GmbH, Steinheim, Germany).
Metabolic activity assay. CLBL-1 cells seeded in the 96-well plate at a density of 0.05×106 cells were exposed to the respective inhibitor or vehicle in a total of 150 μl per well. After mono- (24, 48, and 72 h) or combined (72 h) inhibitor exposure, 15 μl pre-warmed WST-1 reagent (TaKaRa Bio Inc., Kusatsu, Japan) was added into 150 μl cell suspension as well as medium control. The mixture was incubated at 37°C for 2 h. The absorbance at 450 nm and a reference wavelength at 750 nm was detected by Promega GloMax®-Multi Microplate Multimode Reader (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). The absorbance value of the reference wavelength was subtracted from that of the corresponding sample wavelength. Then the blank value was subtracted from the difference, and the result was correlated to the metabolic activity of viable cells.
Early apoptosis and late apoptosis/necrosis measurement. After mono- (24-, 48-, and 72 h) or combined (72 h) inhibitor exposure, CLBL-1 cells were harvested, centrifuged (180 × g, 10 min, 4°C) and washed with PBS twice. Then, the cell pellet was resuspended using 100 μl 1× Annexin binding buffer, which was diluted from 10× Annexin binding buffer (Becton, Dickinson and Company, Heidelberg, Germany). The cells were incubated with 5 μl Annexin V FITC (Becton, Dickinson and Company, Heidelberg, Germany) for 15 min at room temperature in the dark. The cell suspension was adjusted to a final volume of 500 μl with Annexin binding buffer. Immediately before measurement cells were stained with 20 μg/ml Propidium iodide (PI) solution (1.0 mg/ml, Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). In each experiment, unstained and single stained cells were included. Measurement was performed on a BD FACS Verse™ flow cytometer and data analysis was carried out using BD FACSuite™ software (Becton, Dickinson and Company). Early apoptosis (AnnexinV+/PI−) and late apoptosis/necrosis (AnnexinV+/PI+) are combined as apoptosis/necrosis.
Bliss independence model. Synergistic, additive, or antagonistic effects of the combined drugs were determined by the Bliss independence model, which uses the difference (Δ) between the observed (O) and the expected (E) inhibition of the combined treatment. E was calculated as follows: E=(A+B) − (A*B), where A and B were the relative inhibition rates of the two inhibitors. Δ>0 indicating synergistic, and Δ<0 antagonistic effects (27, 28). Based on the data of viable cell number and metabolic activity in the combined application, the bliss values of the combined inhibitors (Ento+IBET, Ento+AZD) were calculated. For calculation, the mean value from three independent experiments was used.
Examination of cell morphology. CLBL-1 cells were incubated with 1 μM Entospletinib, 0.75 μM I-BET151, 0.05 μM AZD5153 and their combination (Ento+IBET, Ento+AZD) for 24, 48 and 72 h. After harvesting the cells, the standard procedure was performed to prepare cytospins, 3 glass slides for each sample. The concentration was adjusted to 5×104 in 200 μl PBS per slide. The slides were centrifuged in the Shandon Cytospin 3 Centrifuge (Shandon, Frankfurt/Main, Germany). The air-dried slides were stained with May-Grünwald solution (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) for 6 min, washed with buffer (pH=7.2), then stained with Giemsa solution (1:10, Merck) for 20 min, and washed with buffer again. After Pappenheim staining, these slides were examined and visualized with Evos XL Core Imaging System (Life Technologies, Darmstadt, Germany), magnified 100 times.
Statistical analysis. Every experiment was repeated independently at least three times. Results of viable cells, metabolic activity, and apoptosis/necrosis are shown as mean value±standard deviation. Significance of difference between the inhibitor exposure and control group was determined using the two-tailed Student's t-test. p-Values <0.05 were considered to be significant, *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001.
Results
Effects of I-BET151, AZD5153 or Entospletinib on CLBL-1 cell proliferation and metabolic activity. I-BET151 inhibited proliferation and metabolic activity significantly in a dose-dependent effect at all time points (Figure 1A and B). The inhibitory effects on proliferation were significant starting at 5 μM in the 24-h group, at 1 μM in the 48- and 72-h groups. The inhibitory effects on metabolic activity were significant starting at 0.5 μM in the 24- and 48-h groups, and at 0.001 μM in the 72-h group. When CLBL-1 cells were incubated with 10 μM I-BET151 for 72 h, cell proliferation and metabolic activity decreased the most, as low as 0.5±0.1% and 2.6±0.7%, respectively. The IC50 value of I-BET151 was 0.971 μM, and 0.75 μM were selected for the concentration of I-BET151 in the combined application experiment.
AZD5153 inhibited proliferation and metabolic activity with a significant dose-dependent effect at all time points (Figure 1C and D). The inhibitory effects on proliferation were significant starting at 0.5 μM in the 24-h group, at 0.1 μM in the 48- and 72-h groups. The inhibitory effects on metabolic activity were significant starting at 0.01 μM in the 24- and 48-h groups, and at 0.1 μM in the 72-h group. When CLBL-1 cells were incubated with 10 μM AZD5153 for 72 h, cell proliferation and metabolic activity decreased the most, as low as 0.1±0.1 % and 2.5±0.6 %, respectively. The IC50 value of AZD5153 was 0.073 μM, and 0.05 μM were selected for the concentration of AZD5153 in the combined application experiment.
In the 24-, 48-, and 72-h groups, Entospletinib inhibited neither proliferation nor metabolic activity under the tested conditions in CLBL-1 (Figure 1E and F). Since the concentrations of Entospletinib in the mono-application did not show antiproliferative effect, the IC50 value was not calculated. Nevertheless, 1 μM Entospletinib was selected for the combined application experiment to evaluate if Entospletinib can synergistically induce an anti-proliferative effect in combination with BET inhibition.
Both I-BET151 and AZD5153 induce early apoptosis and late apoptosis/necrosis of CLBL-1. I-BET151 concentrations above 0.5 μM significantly induced early apoptosis and late apoptosis/necrosis in a dose-dependent manner at 48- and 72-h groups (Figure 2A). Compared to the control, I-BET151 significantly increased early apoptosis and late apoptosis/necrosis from 16.5±1.3% up to a maximum of 66.8±1.8% in the 48-h group, and from 17.8±1.5% up to a maximum of 82.3±2.2% in the 72-h group.
AZD5153 concentrations above 0.05 μM significantly induced early apoptosis and late apoptosis/necrosis in a dose-dependent manner in 48- and 72-h groups (Figure 2B). Compared to the control, AZD5153 significantly increased early apoptosis and late apoptosis/necrosis from 18.2±2.4% up to a maximum of 71.3±2.9% in the 48-h group, and from 16.9±2.3% up to a maximum of 88.3±4.5% in the 72-h group.
I-BET151 and AZD5153 exposure induces morphological changes in CLBL-1 cells. In the DMSO control group, the CLBL-1 cells aggregated and had intact cell membranes, and, occasionally, vacuoles were apparent. After being exposed to Entospletinib and/or BET inhibitors for 24, 48, and 72 h, the integrity of most cells was disrupted. Apoptotic and necrotic phenomena were observed in the inhibitor group (Figures 5 and 6). A large number of abnormal cells and cell debris could be observed. Further, cytoplasmic blebs, condensed chromatin, cell fragmentation, rupture plasma membrane and nucleus, nuclear and cytoplasmic vacuolisation, and apoptotic bodies could be detected.
Combined application of pan-BET inhibitor I-BET151 and Entospletinib does not significantly enhance inhibition of CLBL-1 proliferation and metabolic activity. Compared to the DMSO control or I-BET151, the exposure to the combination of I-BET151 and Entospletinib did not significantly enhance CLBL-1 proliferation inhibition (Figure 3A). Cell exposure to the combination of 1 μM Entospletinib and 0.75 μM I-BET151 reduced the proportion of living cells to 80.3±5.5% (p=0.057).
Further, compared to the control, the exposure to the combined 1 μM Entospletinib and 0.75 μM I-BET151 significantly inhibited metabolic activity in CLBL-1 cells, reducing the proportion of metabolic activity to 54.2±14.2% (Figure 3B). When cells were incubated with either 1 μM Entospletinib or 0.75 μM I-BET151 for 72 h, the proportions of metabolic activity compared to the DMSO control were 106±15.6% and 87.3±38.5%, respectively. There was no significant difference between the effect of I-BET151 alone and combined application (IBET+Ento) on the metabolic activity (p=0.35).
Combined application of isoform-specific AZD5153 and Entospletinib does not significantly enhance inhibition of CLBL-1 cell proliferation and metabolic activity. Compared to the DMSO control, the exposure to the combined AZD5153 and Entospletinib significantly inhibited proliferation and metabolic activity in CLBL-1 (Figure 4A and B). But there was no significant difference between mono and combined application with AZ D5153. When cells were incubated for 72 h with either 1 μM Entospletinib or 0.05 μM AZD5153, the proportions of living cells compared to the DMSO control were 122.2±7.2% and 52.8±6%, respectively. When incubated with the combination of 1 μM Entospletinib and 0.05 μM AZD5153, the proportion of living cells was 50±17.5%.
Further, when cells were incubated for 72 h with either 1 μM Entospletinib or 0.05 μM AZD5153, the proportions of metabolic activity compared to the DMSO control were 106±15.6% and 45.7±10%, respectively. When incubated with the combination of 1 μM Entospletinib and 0.05 μM AZD5153, the proportion of metabolic activity was 49±12.5%.
Combined application of isoform-specific or pan-BET inhibitors and Entospletinib does not significantly enhance induction early apoptosis and late apoptosis/necrosis of CLBL-1 cell. Compared to the DMSO control, the exposure to the combination of BET inhibitors and Entospletinib significantly increased early apoptosis of CLBL-1. But there was no significant difference between the application of BET inhibitor (I-BET151 and AZD5153) alone and the combinations (IBET+Ento, IBET+AZD) in the effect on early apoptosis and late apoptosis/necrosis (Figures 3C and 4C). When CLBL-1 cells were separately incubated with DMSO, ntospletinib (1 μM), I-BET151 (0.75 μM), and AZD5153 (0.05 μM) for 72 h, the proportions of early apoptosis were 3.6±0.6%, 3.3±0.5%, 6±1.9%, and 7.2±1.8%, respectively. And the percentage of late apoptosis/necrosis were 3.4±0.5%, 2.8±0.3%, 2.5±0.4%, and 2.4±0.3%, respectively. When CLBL-1 cells were incubated with combined inhibitors (IBET+Ento, AZD+Ento), the proportions of early apoptosis were 7.4±1.8% and 6.5±1%. And the proportions of late apoptosis/necrosis were 2.7±0.4% and 2.8±0.5%.
Bliss value analysis. Mathematical evaluation of the synergistic potential revealed for all proliferation experiments a BLISS value above 0. The combination of I-BET151 (0.75 μM) and Entospletinib (1 μM) revealed values above 0 (Figure 3D), as well as that of AZD5153 (0.05 μM) and Entospletinib (1 μM). Concerning the corresponding analyses for metabolic activity, the combination of IBET+Ento ranged above 0 and the combination of AZD+Ento below 0 (Figure 4D). The calculated bliss values of the proliferation showed differences (Δ) between observed and expected values of 0.5141 for the combination IBET+Ento and 0.1451 for the combination AZD+Ento. Furthermore, the calculated bliss values of the metabolic activity showed that the differences (Δ) between observed and expected values were 0.3839 for the combination IBET+Ento and -0.0055 for the combination AZD+Ento.
Discussion
BET inhibition has been reported to have antineoplastic effects on lymphoma models (14, 16, 29). Different types of BET inhibition (Pan or selective) have not been assessed in combination with SYK inhibitors to evaluate respective synergistic potential. In the present study, we evaluated whether combining a SYK inhibitor (Entospletinib) with a pan-BET inhibitor (I-BET151) or a selective bivalent BRD4 BET inhibitor (AZD5153) resulted in synergistic effects. BET and SYK inhibition, especially BRD4 inhibition, have anti-proliferative effects through MYC regulation (24, 25). AZD5153 as mono-therapy has been compared with non-selective BET inhibitors in preclinical human acute myeloid leukaemia (AML), multiple myeloma (MM), and DLBCL models showing higher inhibitory effects (16). However, the combination of the SYK inhibitor Entospletinib with selective or pan-BET inhibitors has not been evaluated. Up to 10% of human DLBCL express concurrently rearrangements of BCL2 and MYC through coexisting translocations in the IG locus, also known as “double-hit lymphomas” (30). Data on the characterization of corresponding chromosomal rearrangements in dogs are rare due to the complicated canine karyotype. However, previous data from our group have revealed that the herein used CLBL-1 cell line shows overexpression of BCL2 and MYC DLBCL (17). The use of BET inhibitors could be of particular interest in patients with BCL2 and MYC rearrangements, as one of their main effects is lowering MYC activation (24, 31). SYK inhibition has shown promising results against lymphoma cell lines (32). Preclinical studies using Entospletinib have reported activity mainly against chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) and non-Hodgkin Lymphoma cell lines (33, 34). Patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models using DLBCL cell lines show a strong reduction in proliferation in BCR dependent cell lines (35). Our results showed that CLBL-1 cell line growth is not inhibited by Entospletinib mono-application independently of time and concentration. The observed changes in cell morphology showed the presence of membrane blebs and nuclear vacuolization in the 48-72 h time points without compromising cell viability. But both pan- and isoform-specific BET inhibitors showed significant cell number reduction, apoptotic effects, and morphologic changes as single agents, especially AZD5153. The antiproliferative effect of AZD5153 (72 h, IC50=0.054 μM) is 16 folds stronger than I-BET151 (72 h, IC50=0.870 μM). In the combination setting there were no statistically significant differences after adding Entospletinib to either I-BET151 or AZD5153. The combination of I-BET151 and Entospletinib had a tendency to produce a reduction in cell number and metabolism, and higher apoptosis than I-BET151 alone at 72 h but remained not significant. Similar to I-BET151, no difference was noted with the use of AZD5153 as monotherapy or in combination with Entospletinib.
There are multiple reports of BET inhibitor assays in human haematological cell lines that show the inhibition of cell growth (36). AZD5153, which has a bivalent binding mode to BRD4, has been compared to non-selective BET inhibitors, such as I-BET762, and was found to have 18-fold lower IC50 (16). In our study, we also showed that AZD5153 is more potent than the pan I-BET151 on the CLBL-1 cell line, probably due to its dual point inhibition on BRD4.
The CLBL-1 cell line was resistant to Entospletinib mono application and Entospletinib showed no synergistic effects when added together with BET inhibitors. Preclinical studies in human AML show that hyperactivation of the RAS-MEK-ERK signalling pathway correlates with SYK inhibition resistance, especially through mutations in RAS and PTPN11 (37). Activation of RAS or PI3K pathways could also explain the resistance of CLBL-1 cells to Entospletinib.
A preclinical study has reported the modulatory effects of AZD5153 over the MYC and mTOR pathway in different haematological cell lines. The down-regulation of MYC was independent of the AZD5153 apoptotic effect (16). However, data generated in “double-hit” lymphoma in vitro models failed to show the down-regulation of BCL2 in cell lines overexpressing both MYC and BCL2 following exposure to AZD5153 (31). This could suggest that the effect of AZD5153 on CLBL-1 is also independent on BCL2 regulation. Previous data from our group have shown that the CLBL-1 cell line, as well as a set of primary B-cell lymphomas, overexpress MYC, INPP5D, and BCL2 compared to non-neoplastic lymph nodes (17). Further, CLBL-1 showed discrete overexpression of mTOR and strong down-regulation of PTEN in comparison to a primary lymphoma set and non-neoplastic lymph nodes (17), making this model similar in molecular characteristics with most of the canine DLBCL and “double-hit” human DLBCL. These dysregulations potentially result in activation of the BCR pathway downstream from SYK, explaining the resistance to Entospletinib but sensitivity to BET inhibitors.
In summary, data regarding the use of SYK or BET inhibitor in dogs is limited. Due to the observed expression pattern of MYC and BCL2 in canine lymphoma, it bears potential as a model for “double-hit” human lymphoma, a disease with aggressive behaviour where new therapeutic approaches are needed. To our knowledge, there are no clinical trials that evaluated BET or SYK inhibitors on canine lymphoma. The pharmacologic synergy between pan- or selective BET inhibitors and Entospletinib has not been assessed before. The present data suggests that BRD4 selective BET inhibition could be a useful approach against canine DLBCL.
In CLBL-1 cells, the BCR pathway appears to have hyperactivated effectors, such as RASGRP3, downstream from SYK (17). Therefore, the hyperactivation of downstream effectors will be independent of SYK inhibition, leading potentially to resistance to Entospletinib. Our results provide valuable data for a further evaluation of selective BET inhibitors such as AZD5153 in an in vivo canine lymphoma model, potentially bearing significant value for human clinical trials in the future.
Conclusion
Pan-BET inhibitor I-BET151 and isoform-specific AZD5153 applied alone inhibit proliferation and induce apoptosis/necrosis of CLBL-1 cells at low concentrations. CLBL-1 cells are resistant to Entospletinib. The combination of Entospletinib with I-BET151 or AZD5153 does not significantly enhance inhibition of proliferation and induction of apoptosis/necrosis in CLBL-1 cells.
Acknowledgements
The Authors would like to acknowledge the financial support of the Chinese Scholarship Council (CSC) to Weibo Kong. The Authors also like to thank Dr. Carolin Gabler (Department of Medicine Clinic III, Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine, Rostock University Medical Center, Germany) for assisting in proofreading and handling of the manuscript.
Footnotes
Authors' Contributions
WK performed in vitro work packages, data analysis and partially drafted the manuscript. SS participated study design, supervision in vitro work, participated in data analysis, partial manuscript proofreading. SVP participated in data analysis and manuscript drafting. AS partial in vitro work and data analysis. BR provided CLBL-1, data interpretation morphology. CJ partial study design, edited and approved the manuscript. IN participated in study designing, edited and approved the final manuscript. HME principal study design, coordinated and supervised all work packages, partial manuscript drafting, and finalized the manuscript.
Conflicts of Interest
The Authors declare that they have no conflicts of interests with regard to this study.
- Received May 5, 2020.
- Revision received May 25, 2020.
- Accepted May 27, 2020.
- Copyright© 2020, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved