Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleClinical Studies

The Preoperative Prognostic Nutritional Index Predicts the Development of Deep Venous Thrombosis After Pancreatic Surgery

TOMOHIRO IGUCHI, KEISHI SUGIMACHI, YOHEI MANO, MIHOKO KONO, MASAKI KAGAWA, TOMONORI NAKANOKO, HIDEO UEHARA, MASAHIKO SUGIYAMA, MITSUHIKO OTA, MASAHIKO IKEBE, MASARU MORITA and YASUSHI TOH
Anticancer Research April 2020, 40 (4) 2297-2301; DOI: https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.14195
TOMOHIRO IGUCHI
1Department of Hepato-Biliary Pancreatic Surgery, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: tomo{at}surg2.med.kyushu-u.ac.jp
KEISHI SUGIMACHI
1Department of Hepato-Biliary Pancreatic Surgery, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
YOHEI MANO
1Department of Hepato-Biliary Pancreatic Surgery, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MIHOKO KONO
2Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MASAKI KAGAWA
3Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
TOMONORI NAKANOKO
3Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
HIDEO UEHARA
3Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MASAHIKO SUGIYAMA
3Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MITSUHIKO OTA
3Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MASAHIKO IKEBE
3Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MASARU MORITA
3Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
YASUSHI TOH
3Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background/Aim: Pancreatic surgery is associated with a high risk of developing deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and malnutrition. We aimed to evaluate the factors predicting the development of DVT, focusing on nutrition assessment tools. Patients and Methods: One hundred patients who underwent pancreatic surgery were postoperatively examined for DVT. We assessed the risk factors for the development of DVT after surgery. Results: Postoperative DVT was detected in 11 patients (11%). Patients who developed DVT after surgery were significantly older (p=0.016) and had higher preoperative D-dimer levels (p=0.005) than those who did not. The preoperative prognostic nutritional index (PNI) was mostly associated with the development of DVT (p=0.079). Furthermore, PNI ≤44.3, BUN >20 mg/dl, D-dimer ≥1.9 μg/ml were independent predictors for the development of DVT after surgery. Conclusion: A poor nutrition status and dehydration should be preoperatively improved for patients who are identified, as having a high risk of developing DVT after pancreatic surgery.

  • Prognostic nutritional index
  • deep venous thrombosis
  • pancreatic surgery

Venous thromboembolism (VTE), which consists of pulmonary embolism (PE) and deep venous thrombosis (DVT) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing abdominal oncological surgery (1, 2). In particular, the incidence of VTE after pancreatic surgery is considered to be high (3, 4). The induction of pharmacologic prophylaxis after surgery is recommended by the 9th edition of American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (5) and prevents the development of postoperative VTE (6): however, it is not yet routinely performed in the field of pancreatic surgery because postoperative bleeding is a potentially fatal complication. Thus, identifying patients at high risk for VTE development after pancreatic surgery is a significant clinically relevant problem.

Although D-dimer has been recognized as a sensitive laboratory test for predicting VTE (7, 8), the D-dimer level is commonly elevated in patients with advanced cancer (9). Several studies have reported that preoperative serum D-dimer levels are associated with the development of DVT (10, 11); however, challenges remain in determining the prevalence of DVT before surgery.

Pancreatic surgery, particularly pancreaticoduodenectomy, is a high-risk procedure in comparison to other abdominal surgeries and patients who undergo pancreatic surgery often show a poor nutrition status. It is well known that a poor nutrition status is a risk factor of postoperative complication after surgery (12). It was recently reported that hypoalbuminemia was associated with the development of DVT in patients with liver disease (13), and gastric cancer (14). Malatino et al. demonstrated that DVT could be accurately diagnosed in hospitalized patients based on hypoalbuminemia and decreased protein S (15); thus, we hypothesized that malnutrition may be associated with DVT. However, little is known on the association between the nutritional status and incidence of DVT in patients after pancreatic surgery. Besides serum albumin, several inflammatory and nutritional scores, such as the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) (16), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) (17), controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score (18), modified Glasgow prognostic score (GPS) (19) and prognostic nutritional index (PNI) (20) were reported to be associated with the short-term and long-term outcomes after pancreatic surgery.

The present study aimed to evaluate factors predicting the development of DVT, with a focus on nutrition assessment tools.

Patients and Methods

Patients. Between April 2015 and August 2018, 100 consecutive patients who underwent pancreatic surgery (pancreaticoduodenectomy, n=62; distal pancreatectomy, n=35; total pancreatectomy, n=3) at our Institute were enrolled in this study. Six patients who were preoperatively diagnosed with DVT and 3 patients who did not undergo postoperative US were excluded. This project was approved by the Ethics and Indications Committee of National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center (2017-33). The mean age of the patients was 68.1 years (range=24-85 years). The male-to-female ratio was 61:39. The final diagnoses were pancreatic cancer (n=56), biliary tract cancer (n=16), other cancer (n=6), intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (n=13), neuroendocrine tumor (n=3), and other non-cancerous lesion (n=6). Among 78 patients who were diagnosed with cancer, 66 patients had advanced cancer (Stage ≥2) according to the Union for International Cancer Control. The mean (±standard deviation) operative time and blood loss were 284.9±90.8 min and 251.4±268.2 g, respectively.

Perioperative management. Among 100 patients, 10 patients received induction chemotherapy prior to surgery. With the exception of one laparoscopically-treated case, all patients underwent laparotomy via a midline incision under endotracheal general anesthesia. A central venous catheter was preoperatively inserted from the right internal jugular vein into the superior vena cava in all cases. Postoperative pain was controlled by epidural analgesia or intravenous patient-controlled analgesia, in conjunction with other analgesic medication. Graduated compression stockings and a foot pump were used for mechanical prophylaxis in all cases. All patients received a physical examination. In addition, in 57 cases, enoxaparin was initiated as pharmacologic prophylaxis against VTE on postoperative day 1 or after the removal of the epidural catheter, until postoperative day 7. All patients were routinely examined for VTE on postoperative day 7 using US and enhanced computed tomography.

Sonography. DVT of the whole leg was diagnosed by duplex scanning. Sonography was performed using a Prosound F75 instrument with a 13 MHz high-resolution linear array transducer (Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan). The area of the upper leg, including the common femoral vein, femoral vein and popliteal vein, was evaluated with the venous compression method, with the patient in the supine position. The area of the lower leg, including the peroneal vein, anterior tibial vein, posterior tibial vein, soleal vein and calf vein, was evaluated by the blood flow induction method, with the patient in a sitting position.

Nutrition assessment tools. We assessed some inflammatory and nutritional scores, including the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score, modified Glasgow prognostic score (GPS) and prognostic nutritional index (PNI). The NLR was calculated by dividing the neutrophil count by the lymphocyte count. The PLR was calculated by dividing the platelet count by the lymphocyte count. The CONUT score is an index calculated based on the serum albumin concentration, total lymphocyte count, and total cholesterol concentration, and classifies undernutrition into 4 degrees. The modified GPS classifies undernutrition into 3 degrees based on the combination of the serum albumin level and C-reactive protein concentration. The PNI was calculated as 10× the serum albumin concentration (g/dl) + 0.005 × the lymphocyte count (/mm3).

Statistical analysis. The clinical records of the 100 patients were collected and retrospectively reviewed. The clinical values of the DVT and non-DVT groups were compared using the χ2 test and Student's t-test. The association between clinical factors (including factors identified in this study as being positively associated with DVT), known risk factors for the development of DVT, and the PNI (the nutritional index most strongly associated with DVT) and the development of DVT was evaluated using a multiple regression analysis. The cut-off values of continuous variables were estimated based on a receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. The results were analyzed using the JMP 13.0.0 software program (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). p-Values<0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

Postoperative development of DVT. Eleven of 100 patients developed DVT in the postoperative period. The diameter of DVT detected in 10 patients ranged from 1.4 to 11.0 mm, with an average diameter of 4.5 mm. DVT was detected in the soleus vein (n=8) and fibular vein (n=2). After surgery, one patient developed massive DVT in the common femoral vein to the fibular vein. No PE events were diagnosed during the perioperative period.

Clinical characteristics of the DVT and non-DVT groups. The clinical findings of the DVT group were compared to those of the non-DVT group (Table I). Patients in the DVT group were significantly older (p=0.005) and had lower preoperative serum D-dimer levels (p=0.032) than those in the DVT group. The preoperative blood urea nitrogen (BUN) levels in the DVT group were higher in comparison to the non-DVT group; however, the difference was not statistically significant. Among the nutrition assessment tools, the preoperative PNI was most strongly associated with a higher risk of DVT development, and the preoperative PNI in the DVT group was lower than that in the non-DVT group (p=0.079). There were no differences in the clinical factors of the two groups, including sex, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status, preoperative chemotherapy, stage of cancer progression, operative procedure, operative time, blood loss or other preoperative laboratory levels.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

Comparison of clinical factors between non-DVT group and DVT group.

Predictive factors for postoperative DVT development. In multiple regression analysis, the following variables were independently associated with the risk of postoperative DVT development: PNI ≤44.3, BUN >20 mg/dl and D-dimer ≥1.9 μg/dl (p=0.014, p=0.033 and p=0.036, respectively; Table II).

Discussion

There have been numerous studies on VTE, including the prevalence and risk factors for DVT in patients undergoing surgery (10, 21). Pancreatic surgery is known to be associated with a high risk of DVT after surgery (3, 4). Nevertheless, the clinical relevance of DVT after pancreatic surgery has not been fully elucidated. In this study, we showed that the frequency of DVT after pancreatic surgery was 11.0%. In general, the frequency of VTE after surgery is reported to be 0.63-1.6% (22, 23). Our data also support that the incidence of DVT was high after pancreatic surgery. We also showed that a preoperative low PNI, high BUN and high D-dimer influenced the development of DVT after pancreatic surgery.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table II.

Multivariate analysis of risk factors associated with the incidence of postoperative DVT.

In the present study, we showed that the preoperative PNI, a nutrition assessment tools, was a significant risk factor for the development of DVT after pancreatic surgery. To the best of our knowledge, this study was the first to evaluate the risk factors for DVT after pancreatic surgery with a focus on nutrition assessment tools. It is well recognized that Virchow's triad, including a hypercoagulable state, stasis and endothelial injury contribute to the development of DVT (24). Patients with vascular endothelial injury caused by malnutrition may develop venous thrombosis through the aggregation of platelets or the release of cytokines from subendothelial tissue.

Dehydration induces hemoconcentration and hypervi-scosity of total plasma and the development of a hypercoagulable state. Dehydration has been reported as a significant risk factor for the development in relation to air flights, bariatric surgeries and seasonal variation (25, 26). Tanira et al. demonstrated that dehydration caused changes to the coagulation system, including platelet aggregation and the accelerated formation of thrombosis in mice (27). Consistent with these findings, the preoperative BUN level was a risk factor for the development of DVT after pancreatic surgery in this study. Thus, hypovolemia attributed to vascular permeability following surgical stress, in addition to preoperative dehydration, could induce a severe hypercoagulable state in the perioperative period.

Several factors, including infection, surgery, age and malignancy can lead to D-dimer elevation, irrespective of the development of VTE (28). Hence, the non-specific elevation of D-dimer was observed after surgery. On the other hand, several studies showed that preoperative serum D-dimer elevation was associated with a higher cumulative incidence of postoperative DVT (10, 11). In our study, the preoperative serum D-dimer level was also a risk factor for the development of DVT after surgery, suggesting that a hypercoagulable state already existed in such patients who developed DVT after surgery.

Our study was associated with several limitations. First, this study was a retrospective study that was performed in a single center. Second, it was unclear whether DVT was present before surgery or not. A larger prospective multicenter study performed according to appropriate protocols is needed to validate our results.

In conclusion, this study shows that preoperative PNI, BUN and D-dimer value were associated with the development of DVT and a poor nutrition status and dehydration should be preoperatively improved for patients undergoing pancreatic surgery who are considered to be at increased risk for the development of DVT.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the following grants and foundations: Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research of MEXT/JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number JP 18K07222; SGH FOUNDATION; Fukuoka Foundation for Sound Health Cancer Research Fund and Public Trust Surgery Research Fund. We appreciate the technical support of Mr. Kohta Nakamura and Ms. Yukari Hara.

Footnotes

  • Authors' Contributions

    Tomohiro Iguchi: study concept and design, drafting of manuscript; Keishi Sugimachi: study concept and critical revision of the manuscript; Yohei Mano: data collection; Mihoko Kono: study concept; Msaki Kagawa: data collection; Tomonori Nakanoko: statistical analysis; Hideo Uehara: data collection; Masahiko Sugiyama: data collection; Mitsuhiko Ota: statistical analysis; Masahiko Ikebe: critical revision of the manuscript; Masaru Morita: critical revision of the manuscript; Yasushi Toh: final approval of the manuscript.

  • Conflicts of Interest

    The Authors declare no conflicts of interest associated with this manuscript.

  • Received February 5, 2020.
  • Revision received February 13, 2020.
  • Accepted February 17, 2020.
  • Copyright© 2020, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved

References

  1. ↵
    1. Leonardi MJ,
    2. McGory ML,
    3. Ko CY
    : A systematic review of deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis in cancer patients: implications for improving quality. Ann Surg Oncol 14(2): 929-936, 2007. PMID: 17103259. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-006-9183-9
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Riess H,
    2. Habbel P,
    3. Jühling A,
    4. Sinn M,
    5. Pelzer U
    : Primary prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolic events in patients with gastrointestinal cancers - Review. World J Gastrointest Oncol 8(3): 258-270, 2016. PMID: 26989461. DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v8.i3.258
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Hayashi H,
    2. Morikawa T,
    3. Yoshida H,
    4. Motoi F,
    5. Okada T,
    6. Nakagawa K,
    7. Mizuma M,
    8. Naitoh T,
    9. Katayose Y,
    10. Unno M
    : Safety of postoperative thromboprophylaxis after major hepatobiliary-pancreatic surgery in Japanese patients. Surg Today 44(9): 1660-1668, 2014. PMID: 24687760. DOI: 10.1007/s00595-014-0890-8
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Reinke CE,
    2. Drebin JA,
    3. Kreider S,
    4. Kean C,
    5. Resnick A,
    6. Raper S,
    7. Kelz RR
    : Timing of preoperative pharmacoprophylaxis for pancreatic surgery patients: a venous thromboembolism reduction initiative. Ann Surg Oncol 19(1): 19-25, 2012. PMID: 21725687. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-011-1858-1
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Rogers SO Jr.,
    2. Kilaru RK,
    3. Hosokawa P,
    4. Henderson WG,
    5. Zinner MJ,
    6. Khuri SF
    : Multivariable predictors of postoperative venous thromboembolic events after general and vascular surgery: results from the patient safety in surgery study. J Am Coll Surg 204(6): 1211-1221, 2007. PMID: 17544079. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.02.072
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Tanaka Y,
    2. Yamada A,
    3. Hirata S,
    4. Tanaka H,
    5. Sakuratani T,
    6. Matsuhashi N,
    7. Yamaguchi K,
    8. Shimokawa T,
    9. Yoshida K
    : Efficacy and safety of enoxaparin for prophylaxis of postoperative venous thromboembolism after esophagectomy: A single-center prospective randomized controlled phase II study. Anticancer Res 39(5): 2615-2625, 2019. PMID: 31092460. DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.13385
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    1. Toshima H,
    2. Ikusue T,
    3. Hisamatsu A,
    4. Kobayashi K,
    5. Ishida H,
    6. Shimada K
    : VEGF inhibitors do not increase d-dimer levels in colorectal cancer patients without venous thromboembolism: A retrospective non-inferiority analysis. In Vivo 33(6): 2117-2123, 2019. PMID: 31662546. DOI: 10.21873/invivo.11712
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Gruettner J,
    2. Walter T,
    3. Bolte M,
    4. Haghi D,
    5. Sudarski S,
    6. Henzler T
    : Incidence of pulmonary embolism in an emergency department cohort evaluated with a simple symptom-based diagnostic algorithm. In Vivo 27(2): 215-220, 2013. PMID: 23422481.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. Ay C,
    2. Dunkler D,
    3. Pirker R,
    4. Thaler J,
    5. Quehenberger P,
    6. Wagner O,
    7. Zielinski C,
    8. Pabinger I
    : High D-dimer levels are associated with poor prognosis in cancer patients. Haematologica 97(8): 1158-1164, 2012. PMID: 22371182. DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2011.054718
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. Sugimachi K,
    2. Tajiri H,
    3. Kinjo N,
    4. Ikebe M,
    5. Wang H,
    6. Tanaka K,
    7. Tsukamoto S,
    8. Mii S,
    9. Higashi H
    : Incidence and predictors of deep venous thrombosis after abdominal oncologic surgery: prospective Doppler ultrasound screening. J Surg Res 178(2): 657-661, 2012. PMID: 22739045. DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2012.06.002
    OpenUrlPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Stender MT,
    2. Frøkjaer JB,
    3. Larsen TB,
    4. Lundbye-Christensen S,
    5. Thorlacius-Ussing O
    : Preoperative plasma D-dimer is a predictor of postoperative deep venous thrombosis in colorectal cancer patients: a clinical, prospective cohort study with one-year follow-up. Dis Colon Rectum 52(3): 446-451, 2009. PMID: 19333044. DOI: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e318197e2b2
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Bacalbasa N,
    2. Balescu I,
    3. Vilcu M,
    4. Dima S,
    5. Brezean I
    : The impact of the preoperative status on the short-term outcomes after exenteration and pelvic reconstruction. In Vivo 33(6): 2147-2152, 2019. PMID: 31662550. DOI: 10.21873/invivo.11716
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    1. Anthony Lizarraga W,
    2. Dalia S,
    3. Reinert SE,
    4. Schiffman FJ
    : Venous thrombosis in patients with chronic liver disease. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis 21(5): 431-435, 2010. PMID: 20595823. DOI: 10.1097/MBC.0b013e328337b3ba
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Takayoshi K,
    2. Kusaba H,
    3. Aikawa T,
    4. Koreishi S,
    5. Sagara K,
    6. Nakano M,
    7. Komoda M,
    8. Kono M,
    9. Fukata M,
    10. Arita T,
    11. Esaki T,
    12. Akashi K,
    13. Baba E
    : Hypoalbuminemia for the prediction of venous thromboembolism and treatment of direct oral anticoagulants in metastatic gastric cancer patients. Gastric Cancer 22(5): 988-998, 2019. PMID: 30788749. DOI: 10.1007/s10120-019-00930-2
    OpenUrlPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Malatino L,
    2. Cardella AM,
    3. Puccia G,
    4. Cilia C,
    5. Terranova V,
    6. Cataudella E,
    7. Buonacera A,
    8. Tripepi G,
    9. Di Marca S,
    10. Mastrosimone G,
    11. Pisano M,
    12. Giordano M,
    13. Stancanelli B
    : Testing clinical scores to diagnose incident deep vein thrombosis in patients hospitalized in a department of medicine: Can biomarkers improve accuracy? Angiology 67(3): 245-251, 2016. PMID: 25991607. DOI: 10.1177/0003319715586289
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Tsujita E,
    2. Ikeda Y,
    3. Kinjo N,
    4. Yamashita YI,
    5. Hisano T,
    6. Furukawa M,
    7. Taguchi KI,
    8. Morita M,
    9. Toh Y,
    10. Okamura T
    : Postoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as a predictor of long-term prognosis after pancreatectomy for pancreatic carcinoma: A retrospective analysis. Am Surg 83(6): 610-616, 2017. PMID: 28637563.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Watanabe J,
    2. Otani S,
    3. Sakamoto T,
    4. Arai Y,
    5. Hanaki T,
    6. Amisaki M,
    7. Tokuyasu N,
    8. Honjo S,
    9. Ikeguchi M
    : Prognostic indicators based on inflammatory and nutritional factors after pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer. Surg Today 46(11): 1258-1267, 2016. PMID: 26869184. DOI: 10.1007/s00595-016-1308-6
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Kato Y,
    2. Yamada S,
    3. Suenaga M,
    4. Takami H,
    5. Niwa Y,
    6. Hayashi M,
    7. Iwata N,
    8. Kanda M,
    9. Tanaka C,
    10. Nakayama G,
    11. Koike M,
    12. Fujiwara M,
    13. Kodera Y
    : Impact of the controlling nutritional status score on the prognosis after curative resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Pancreas 47(7): 823-829, 2018. PMID: 29975352. DOI: 10.1097/MPA.0000000000001105
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Fujiwara Y,
    2. Haruki K,
    3. Shiba H,
    4. Hamura R,
    5. Horiuchi T,
    6. Shirai Y,
    7. Furukawa K,
    8. Gocho T,
    9. Yanaga K
    : C-reactive protein-based prognostic measures are superior at predicting survival compared with peripheral blood cell count-based ones in patients after curative resection for pancreatic cancer. Anticancer Res 38(11): 6491-6499, 2018. PMID: 30396977. DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.13013
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    1. Kanda M,
    2. Fujii T,
    3. Kodera Y,
    4. Nagai S,
    5. Takeda S,
    6. Nakao A
    : Nutritional predictors of postoperative outcome in pancreatic cancer. Br J Surg 98(2): 268-274, 2011. PMID: 20960457. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.7305
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Nakagawa K,
    2. Watanabe J,
    3. Suwa Y,
    4. Suzuki S,
    5. Ishibe A,
    6. Ota M,
    7. Kunisaki C,
    8. Endo I
    : Clinical analysis of preoperative deep vein thrombosis risk factors in patients with colorectal cancer: Retrospective observational study. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 3(4): 451-458, 2019. PMID: 31346583. DOI: 10.1002/ags3.12256
    OpenUrlPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Nelson RE,
    2. Grosse SD,
    3. Waitzman NJ,
    4. Lin J,
    5. DuVall SL,
    6. Patterson O,
    7. Tsai J,
    8. Reyes N
    : Using multiple sources of data for surveillance of postoperative venous thromboembolism among surgical patients treated in Department of Veterans Affairs hospitals, 2005-2010. Thromb Res 135(4): 636-642, 2015. PMID: 25666908. DOI: 10.1016/j.thromres.2015.01.026
    OpenUrlPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Rogers SO Jr..,
    2. Kilaru RK,
    3. Hosokawa P,
    4. Henderson WG,
    5. Zinner MJ,
    6. Khuri SF
    : Multivariable predictors of postoperative venous thromboembolic events after general and vascular surgery: results from the patient safety in surgery study. J Am Coll Surg 204(6): 1211-1221, 2007. PMID: 17544079. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.02.072
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Barth JA
    1. Matzdorff AC,
    2. Bell WR
    1. Virchow RLK
    : Thrombosis and Embolie, 1846–1856. In: Barth JA, ed. Klassiker der Medizin herausgegeben von Karl Sudhoff, Leipzig, 1910; translated by Matzdorff AC, Bell WR. Canton, Science History Publ, 1998.
  25. ↵
    1. Gavish I,
    2. Brenner B
    : Air travel and the risk of thromboembolism. Intern Emerg Med 6(2): 113-116, 2011. PMID: 21057984. DOI: 10.1007/s11739-010-0474-6
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Elias S,
    2. Hoffman R,
    3. Saharov G,
    4. Brenner B,
    5. Nadir Y
    : Dehydration as a possible cause of monthly variation in the incidence of venous thromboembolism. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost 22(6): 569-574, 2016. PMID: 27206642. DOI: 10.1177/1076029616649435
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Tanira MO,
    2. el-Sabban FF,
    3. Fahim MA,
    4. Wasfi IA
    : Acetyl salicylic acid alleviates increased susceptibility to thrombosis in pial microvessels of dehydrated mice. J Vet Med Sci 56(2): 245-248, 1994. PMID: 8075211. DOI: 10.1292/jvms.56.245
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Tripodi A
    : D-dimer testing in laboratory practice. Clin Chem 57(9): 1256-1262, 2011. PMID: 21719689. DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2011.166249
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research
Vol. 40, Issue 4
April 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Preoperative Prognostic Nutritional Index Predicts the Development of Deep Venous Thrombosis After Pancreatic Surgery
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
3 + 3 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
The Preoperative Prognostic Nutritional Index Predicts the Development of Deep Venous Thrombosis After Pancreatic Surgery
TOMOHIRO IGUCHI, KEISHI SUGIMACHI, YOHEI MANO, MIHOKO KONO, MASAKI KAGAWA, TOMONORI NAKANOKO, HIDEO UEHARA, MASAHIKO SUGIYAMA, MITSUHIKO OTA, MASAHIKO IKEBE, MASARU MORITA, YASUSHI TOH
Anticancer Research Apr 2020, 40 (4) 2297-2301; DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.14195

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
The Preoperative Prognostic Nutritional Index Predicts the Development of Deep Venous Thrombosis After Pancreatic Surgery
TOMOHIRO IGUCHI, KEISHI SUGIMACHI, YOHEI MANO, MIHOKO KONO, MASAKI KAGAWA, TOMONORI NAKANOKO, HIDEO UEHARA, MASAHIKO SUGIYAMA, MITSUHIKO OTA, MASAHIKO IKEBE, MASARU MORITA, YASUSHI TOH
Anticancer Research Apr 2020, 40 (4) 2297-2301; DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.14195
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Patients and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

  • Clinical Impact of Nutrition and Inflammation Assessment Tools in Pancreatic Cancer Treatment
  • Incidence and Risk of Venous Thromboembolism in Patients With Resectable Pancreatic Cancer Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
  • Risk Factors for Venous Thromboembolism in Patients With Small Cell Lung Cancer
  • Prognostic Impact of Coagulation Activity in Patients Undergoing Curative Resection for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • A Reminder App for Optimizing Bladder Filling During Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer: A Pre-study in Healthy Volunteers
  • Timing and Risk Factors for Hyperglycemia Associated With Anamorelin Administration
  • Identification of Risk Factors for the Local Recurrence of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Post-radiofrequency Ablation
Show more Clinical Studies

Keywords

  • prognostic nutritional index
  • deep venous thrombosis
  • pancreatic surgery
Anticancer Research

© 2026 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire