Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleExperimental Studies

Grape Stem Extracts From Three Native Greek Vine Varieties Exhibit Strong Antioxidant and Antimutagenic Properties

ARISTIDIS S. VESKOUKIS, ELENI VASSI, KONSTANTINOS POULAS, MANOLIS KOKKINAKIS, EFTIHIA ASPRODINI, SERKOS HAROUTOUNIAN and DEMETRIOS KOURETAS
Anticancer Research April 2020, 40 (4) 2025-2032; DOI: https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.14159
ARISTIDIS S. VESKOUKIS
1Department of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
ELENI VASSI
1Department of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
KONSTANTINOS POULAS
2Department of Pharmacy, University of Patras, Patras, Greece
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MANOLIS KOKKINAKIS
3Laboratory of Toxicology, School of Medicine, University of Crete, Heraklion, Greece
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
EFTIHIA ASPRODINI
4Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
SERKOS HAROUTOUNIAN
5Laboratory of Nutritional Physiology and Feeding, Department of Animal Bioscience, Agricultural University of Athens, Athens, Greece
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DEMETRIOS KOURETAS
1Department of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: dkouret@uth.gr
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background/Aim: The winemaking procedure results in the generation of stems, a by-product that is harmful to the environment. Concomitantly, stems are rich in polyphenols and, hence, they are putatively beneficial for human health. Materials and Methods: In this study, the grape stem extracts derived from three native Greek vine varieties, namely Mavrodaphne, Muscat and Rhoditis were examined for their chemical composition and antioxidant and antimutagenic properties using a battery of in vitro biomarkers. Results: All extracts are rich in polyphenols. Moreover, they exhibit potent antioxidant and antimutagenic properties with the extract of Mavrodaphne being the strongest in reducing the DPPH• and O2−• radicals and the Fe3+ and in protecting plasmid DNA from peroxyl radical-induced oxidative modification. Conclusion: Therefore, although they are serious pollutants, grape stems contain phytochemicals with important biological properties and can be used as (ingredients of) bio-functional foods to improve certain aspects of human health.

  • Grape stem extracts
  • Greek vine varieties
  • antioxidants
  • antimutagenic properties
  • polyphenols
  • bio-functional foods

Grape is the fruit of the grapevine that comprises approximately 80 species of vining plants (1). Vitis vinifera is a common grapevine belonging to the family Vitaceae and is native in the Mediterranean basin, central Europe, and south-western Asia (1). According to the archaeological evidence, grape is cultivated as a domesticated plant since 4,000-6,000 B.C. in the region of south Caucasus starting from the Vitis vinifera subsp. sylvestris, which is the progenitor of today's Vitis vinifera subsp. Vinifera (2). Vine is one of the oldest plants cultivated by humans that is also mentioned in the Bible, thus being an important piece of human culture (3). There are numerous grapevine varieties and on this basis, grape is typically consumed as a table fruit in the form of dried raisins or it is crushed to produce juice and wine. Grapes are a nutritional source of minerals such as phosphorus and calcium and vitamin A whereas they contain sugars (especially glucose and fructose) in amounts that depend on the variety (1). Apart from the above-mentioned constituents, grapes contain high amounts of polyphenolic compounds with essential roles in human health (4). It is established that grape polyphenols and especially resveratrol that is the most abundant, possess significant antioxidant, anti-diabetic and antimicrobial properties (5). Additionally, wine, the most common product of grapes is a fundamental pillar in the mediterranean diet (MD). Interestingly, Ancel Keys observed that the poor populations in the Italian countryside were healthier than their wealthy counterparts residing in New York. Seeking an explanation, he hypothesized that the nutritional habits and the way of life were related to the lower frequency of individuals suffering from cardiovascular disease (6). Therefore, he conducted the well-known “Seven Countries Study” (i.e., Greece, Finland, Italy, Holland, United States, Yugoslavia, Japan) and concluded that a nutritional profile resembling to the MD (i.e., consumption of fruit and vegetables, plenty of olive oil, confined animal fat and one or two glasses of red wine) was the explanation he quested (7).

Although small quantities of wine are an important constituent of MD, the chemical procedure for its production leads to the release of compounds with serious polluting burden to the environment. Indeed, grape stems that are by-products of the vinification process include the remains of grapevine such as leaves and tendrils (8). Grape stems are the less valorised residues that are generated after vinification since, in contrast to grape pomace that can be used as ingredients of animal feed in order to improve meat quality and redox status, they have practically fewer uses (9). This is why they are easily discarded in the environment leading to the pollution of soil and waters. It is worth mentioning that grape stems are rich in phytochemical compounds with important biological actions, namely polyphenols and mainly resveratrol, catechin, procyanidin B3 and gallic acid and, interestingly, they contain the aforementioned compounds in higher concentrations compared to the intact grape or wine (10). Nevertheless, the high amounts of polyphenols present in the stems may hamper their biodegradation and, hence, promote their accumulation in the environment (11). At the same time, the presence of polyphenolic compounds in grape stems gives them exceptional biological value (12). It has been shown that extracts derived from grape stems possess potent antioxidant activity in vitro (13) and in cell lines (14), whereas their anticarcinogenic and antiangiogenic roles have also been reported (15-17).

Although grape stems possess beneficial properties for human health, the studies on the biological roles of stems and especially of those generated from Greek grape varieties are scarce. Therefore, the main objective of the present study was to investigate the potential antioxidant and antimutagenic properties of extracts derived from stems of three native Greek vine varieties with special characteristics, namely Mavrodaphne, Muscat and Rhoditis. The ultimate goal is to holistically characterize these plant extracts in terms of their biological roles in vitro and in vivo in order to putatively use them as (ingredients of) bio-functional foods (18, 19). Regarding the three studied grape varieties, Mavrodaphne whose name literally means black laurel is mainly cultivated in Patras, Peloponnese, and is a highly identifiable Greek variety. The Mavrodaphne grape has a near-black colour and the produced wine has an aroma of dried prunes and currants and resembles to the Port dessert wines (20). Muscat (or Moscato) is a prestigious white grape variety comprising many grape families and constitutes a native Greek product. It is stated that the cultivation of Muscat grapes started in Greece and that this variety set the foundations of wine making procedure worldwide (21). In this study, we have used an extract originated from a Muscat grape variety that is a product of the city of Patras. Finally, Rhoditis is a pink-skinned grape variety, which is also cultivated in Patras's vineyards. It is, however, widely planted throughout Greece and it is used for the generation of retsina, a wine product that is a trademark of Greece (22). The three aforementioned grape varieties are used for the production of protected designation of origin (PDO) wines.

Materials and Methods

Collection of the plant material. The tested samples were collected from Patras vineyards in 2018. Samples of grape stems were manually collected from three vine varieties, specifically Mavrodaphne, Muscat and Rhoditis. After collection, the stems were air-dried, powdered using a mill and stored at RT.

Extraction process. Fifty grams of the stem samples were dissolved into a 200 ml of a mixture of methanol (MeOH)/H2O/1.0 N HCl (90:9.5:0.5 v/v) and were sonicated for 10 min in an ultrasonic bath (Bandelin Sonorex super, model RK100SH, Berlin, Germany). The solvent was separated by filtration, and the remaining solid was re-extracted two additional times, using the same solvent system and procedure. The extracts were evaporated under vacuum forming a slurry, which was dissolved in 30 ml of MeOH/H2O (1:1) and centrifuged (5,000 g, 10 min, 25°C). Afterwards, the supernatant liquid was extracted with petroleum ether (3×30 ml) to remove the lipids and concentrated under vacuum. The remaining residue was poured into 30 ml of brine and extracted repetitively with ethyl acetate (EtOAc, 4×30 ml). As a result, all sugars remained in the aqueous layer. Then, the combined organic layers were dried over anhydrous magnesium sulfate and evaporated under vacuum. The remaining solid was weighed and dissolved in MeOH (1 mg/ml), membrane filtered (0.45 μm) and subjected to liquid chromatography analysis. To avoid polyphenol degradation, the aforementioned procedure was performed in the absence of direct sunlight and at temperatures ranging between 30 and 35°C.

Determination of the extracts chemical Composition by HPLC and HPLC-ESI/MS. The chemical composition of the extracts was determined using HPLC analysis that was performed on a Hewlett Packard HP1100 (Hewlett Packard, Palo Alto, CA, USA) equipped with an Agilent 1100 diode-array detector (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) (measuring absorbance over the full wavelength range during the entire run), a quaternary pump, degasser and coupled to HP ChemStation utilizing the manufacturer's 5.01 software package system. A Lichosphere C18 chromatographic column obtained from Merck, Darmstadt, Germany (250 mm × 4.1 mm, particle size 5 μm) was used and connected with a guard column of the same material (8×4 mm). Injection was by means of a Rheodyne injection valve (model 7725I) with a 20 μl fixed loop obtained from Merck, Darmstadt, Germany. For the chromatographic analyses HPLC-grade H2O was prepared using a Milli-Q system (Merck Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA), whereas all HPLC solvents (except acetonitrile) were filtered through cellulose acetate membranes of 0.45 μm pore size prior to use. The mobile phase was composed of a gradient system of 0.3% acetic acid in water (A) and acetonitrile (B). The flow rate was maintained at 1 ml/min and the column gradient elution program consisted of 25% B (0 min). 25% B (5 min). 30% B (10 min). 40% B (15 min), 50% B (20 min), 70% B (30 min) where it remained for additional 5 min, and returned during 2 min to initial conditions, where it stayed for additional 2 min. This routine was followed by a 15-min equilibration period with the zero-time mixture prior to injection of the next sample. Peaks were identified by comparing their retention times and UV–vis spectra with the reference compounds and data were quantitated using the corresponding curves of the reference compounds as standards.

Confirmatory UPLC-MS/MS analysis was carried out on a Thermo Scientific Ultra High Performance Liquid Chromatography system coupled to a TSQ Quantum Vantage (Thermo Fischer Scientific, San Jose, CA, USA) triple quadrupole mass spectrometer. Mass spectrometric analysis was conducted using a heated electrospray ionization (HESI) operating in two complementary modes (positive and negative mode). Selected ion monitoring (SIM) mode was primarily used to confirm the presence of analytes. In selected cases of compounds tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) utilizing the multiple reaction monitoring mode (MRM) was employed for additional confirmation. The working conditions were the following: spray voltage 4.2 kV, vaporizer and capillary temperatures 280 and 260°C, respectively, while sheath and auxiliary gas at 60 and 40 arbitrary units, correspondingly. The LC separation was achieved on a Hypersil Gold. 3 μm. 150×3 mm i.d. chromatographic column (Thermo Fischer Scientific, San Jose, CA, USA). The mobile phase and the gradient system were identical to the abovementioned for the HPLC-UV analysis, using a flow rate of 0.3 ml/min.

Determination of the total polyphenolic content (TPC) of the extracts. For the determination of the total polyphenolic content, 20 μl of each extract was mixed with 1.6 ml of dH2O, and 100 μl of Folin-Ciocalteu reagent (0.2 N) as previously described (23, 24). Then, 280 μl of Na2CO3 solution (200 g/l) was added and after 1 h incubation in the dark 25°C, the optical density was monitored at 765 nm. TPC was calculated on the basis of a calibration curve of gallic acid (concentration range: 50-250 mg/l, R2=0.997). The results are expressed as gallic acid equivalents (GAEs) using the standard curve (absorbance versus concentration) prepared from solutions with known gallic acid concentrations.

Determination of total flavonoid content (TFC) of the extracts. The total flavonoid content of the extracts was determined using a modified colorimetric method (25). In particular, 1 ml of each methanolic extract was added into a 10 ml flask containing 4 ml of dH2O. Then, 300 μl of 5% NaNO2 was added and the mixture was allowed to stand for 5 min at 25°C. Then, 300 μl of 10% AlCl3*6H2O was added, the mixture was allowed to stand for 1 min at 25°C and 2 ml of 1 M NaOH was added. The solution was diluted to a final volume equal to 10 ml by adding dH2O and the absorbance of the solution versus the blank was monitored at 510 nm. The results are expressed as catechin equivalents using a standard curve (absorbance versus concentration) prepared from catechin samples with known concentrations.

The assay for the determination of the capacity of the extracts to reduce DPPH• radical. The ability of the extracts to scavenge DPPH• radical was measured according to a protocol previously described (19, 26). Briefly, 1 ml of freshly made methanolic solution of DPPH• radical (100 μM) was mixed with the tested extracts dissolved in dH2O at a wide range of concentrations (0.75-37.5 μg/ml). The absorbance of the samples was monitored at 517 nm after a 20 min incubation in dark at 25°C. In each experiment, the tested sample alone in methanol was used as the blank and DPPH• alone in methanol was used as the control. The percentage of radical scavenging capacity (RSC) of the tested extracts was calculated according to the following equation: Embedded Image where Abscontrol and Abssample are the absorbance values of the control and the tested sample, respectively. Moreover, in order to compare the RCS of the extracts, the IC50 value showing the concentration that induced the scavenging of the DPPH• radical at 50% was estimated.

The assay for the determination of the capacity of the extracts to reduce ABTS•+ radical. The ABTS•+ radical scavenging ability of the tested extracts was determined as previously described (19, 26). Briefly, the reaction was carried out in 1 ml and the mixture contained ABTS•+ (1 mM), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2, 30 μM) and horseradish peroxidase (HRP) (6 μM). The samples were vigorously mixed after incubation in the dark at 25°C for 45 min. Subsequently, 10 μl of each extract at a wide range of concentrations (0.75-37.5 μg/ml) were added to the reaction mixture and the absorbance at 730 nm was monitored. In each experiment, the HRP free tested sample was used as the blank and the ABTS•+ radical solution with H2O and HRP was used as the control. The percentage of RSC and the IC50 values of the extracts were determined similarly to the DPPH• assay.

The assay for the determination of the capacity of the extracts to reduce Fe3+ to Fe2+ (i.e., the reducing power assay). The reducing power of the extracts was determined as previously described (19, 24). In brief, the extracts were dissolved in phosphate buffer (0.2 M, pH=6.6) at a wide range of concentrations (0.375-15 μg/ml). At first, 250 μl of each sample solution was added to 250 μl of potassium ferricyanide (1% w/v) and incubated at 50°C for 20 min. The samples were cooled on ice for 3 min. Subsequently, 250 μl of TCA (10%) was added in the mixture and the samples were centrifuged (5,000 g, 10 min, 25°C). Then, 250 μl of dH2O and 500 μl of ferric chloride (0.1% w/v) were added to 600 μl of the supernatant, the samples were incubated in the dark at 25°C for 10 min and the absorbance was monitored at 700 nm. In order to compare the reducing power of each extract the RP0.5AU value which shows the extract concentration which causes absorbance of 0.5 AU at 700 nm was calculated. The reducing power of the extracts is also expressed as IC50.

The assay for the determination of the capacity of the extracts to reduce superoxide radical (O2•−). The superoxide radical scavenging capacity of the extracts was evaluated as previously described (19, 24). Briefly, 50 ml of each extract was dissolved in dH2O at a wide range of concentrations (5-50 μg/ml) and was added in 625 μl of Tris-HCl (16 mM, pH=8), 125 μl of NBT (300 μM) and 125 μl of NADH (60 μM). Then, the samples were incubated in the dark at 25°C for 5 min and the absorbance was monitored at 560 nm. The percentage of RSC and the IC50 values were determined similarly to the DPPH• assay.

The assay for the determination of the capacity of the extracts to reduce hydroxyl radical (OH•). This ability of the extracts to reduce OH• was determined as previously described (19, 24). In brief, 75 μl of each extract dissolved in dH2O at a wide range of concentrations (2-100 μg/ml) were added in 225 μl of phosphate buffer (0.2 M, pH=7.4), 75 μl of 2-deoxyribose (10 mM), 75 μl of FeSO4-EDTA (10 mM), 30 μl of H2O2 (10 mM) and 270 μl of dH2O. The samples were incubated in the dark at 37°C for 1 h. Subsequently, 375 μl of trichloroacetic acid (TCA, 2.8%) and 375 μl of 2-thiobarbituric acid (1% w/v) were added and the samples were incubated at 95°C for 10 min. Then the samples were cooled on ice for 3 min, centrifuged (5,000 g, 10 min, 25°C) and the absorbance was monitored at 520 nm. The samples without H2O2 were used as the blank and the samples without protein were used as the control. The percentage of RSC and the IC50 values were determined similarly to the DPPH• assay.

The assay for the determination of the capacity of the extracts to protect plasmid DNA strand scissions induced by peroxyl radical (ROO•). The assay was performed as described previously (19, 27). The protective activity of the tested extracts against ROO• was based on the inhibition of the conversion of the normal supercoiled form of DNA to the open circular, which is an indication of oxidative modification. The reaction mixture (10 μl) containing Bluescript-SK+ plasmid DNA (1 μg), various concentrations of the tested extracts (2-230 μg/ml) and 2,2’-azobis (2-amidinopropane hydrochloride (AAPH, 570 mM) in PBS was incubated for 45 min at 37°C. The reaction was terminated by the addition of loading buffer (3 μl, 0.25% bromophenol blue and 30% glycerol) and analyzed in 0.8% agarose gel electrophoresis at 70 V for 1 h. The gels were stained with ethidium bromide (0.5 μg/ml), distained with dH2O, photographed by UV transillumination using the Vilber Lourmat photodocumentation system (DP-001.FDC, Torcy, France) and analyzed with the Gel-Pro Analyzer version 3.0 (Media Cybernetics, Silver Spring, Rockville, MD, USA).

The percentage inhibition was calculated using the following equation: Embedded Image where Scontrol is the percentage of the supercoiled DNA of the negative control sample (plasmid DNA alone), So is the percentage of the super-coiled plasmid DNA of the positive control sample (without the tested extracts but in the presence of the radical initiating factor) and S is the percentage of the supercoiled plasmid DNA of the sample with the tested extracts and the radical initiating factor. The IC50 values were determined similarly to the DPPH• assay.

The assay for the determination of the capacity of the extracts to inhibit the mutations in Salmonella typhimurium (i.e., the Ames test). The bacterial strain that was used in order to determine the antimutagenic activity of the extracts was Salmonella typhimurium TA102 and the protocol was based on Maron and Ames (1983) (28), as previously described (19). For each experiment a frozen stock culture stored at −80°C was thawed at 25°C. Then, 700 μl of the stock culture were used to inoculate 30 ml of autoclaved Oxoid nutrient broth no. 2. The inoculated culture was incubated in the dark at 37°C for 2.5 h until the cells reached a density of 1-2×109 colony forming units (CFU/ml, OD540 between 0.1 and 0.2AU). When the strain was in the exponential phase, the experiment began. The following substances were added in plastic falcon tubes at 45°C±2°C: 2 ml of top agar, 50 μl of various concentrations of each extract, 50 μl of tert-butylhydroperoxide (t-BOOH) solution (0.4 mM final concentration) and 100 μl of the bacterial culture. The contents of the tubes were mixed vigorously and poured onto the surface of glucose minimal agar plates. When the top agar was hardened the plates were inverted and placed in an incubator at 37°C for 48 h. Afterwards, the histidine revertant colonies (His+) were counted. Before counting, the agar plates were microscopically checked for toxicity. Each assay included both positive (the oxidizing agent alone) and negative controls (plates without the oxidizing agent or the tested extract). Also, each antioxidant was examined at the two highest concentrations of the extracts used for possible induction of mutations. The number of induced revertants was obtained by subtracting the number of the spontaneous revertants from the number of the revertants on the plates containing the mutagen and/or the antioxidant. The percentage inhibition of mutagenicity was calculated as follows: Embedded Image

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

The chemical composition of the three tested grape stem extracts.

Statistical analysis. The data were analyzed with one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's test using the statistical package for social sciences (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA, version 21.0). All experiments were carried out in triplicate and on at least two separate occasions. All results are expressed as mean±SD (i.e., standard deviation). The level of the statistical significance was set at p<0.05.

Results

Chemical composition of the grape stem extracts. The chemical composition of the three tested extracts is depicted in Table I. The stem extract derived from Mavrodaphne is rich in gallic acid and caffeic acid, a hydroxybenzoic and a hydroxycinnamic acid, respectively, whereas it contains higher amounts of the flavonol quercetin and quercitrin, a flavonol glycoside, compared to the other two extracts. The extract generated from Muscat contains higher concentrations of gallocatechin, a flavanol, polydatin, which is a stilbene and hesperidin, a flavanon glycoside, in comparison to Mavrodaphne and Rhoditis. Finally, the chemical compounds detected in the extract of Rhoditis in higher amounts compared to Mavrodaphne and Muscat are two members of proantho-cyanidins (procyanidin B1 and B2), the flavanols catechin and epicatechin, two hydroxybenzoic acids (2,5 dihydroxybenzoic acid, ellagic acid), the flavonol rutin, quercitrin-3-b-glucoside which is a flavonol glycoside and trans-resveratrol, a well-known stilbene.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table II.

The IC50 values of the three tested grape stem extracts in the biomarkers/bioassays that were used to evaluate their antioxidant and antimutagenic properties.

Total polyphenolic and flavonoid content of the extracts. The total polyphenolic content (TPC) of the Mavrodaphne stem extract (i.e., 374.765 mg of gallic acid equivalent/g dried weight of the extract) was higher than the TPC of the Muscat and Rhoditis extracts (i.e., 264.795 and 359.865 mg of gallic acid equivalent/g dried weight of the extract, respectively). With respect to the total flavonoid content, the Muscat extract was richer (i.e., 17.478 mg of catechin equivalent/g dried weight of the extract) compared to the extracts of Mavrodaphne and Rhoditis (i.e., 14.047 and 12.630 mg of catechin equivalent/g dried weight of the extract, respectively).

Antioxidant properties of the extracts. The obtained results indicate that the stem extract of Mavrodaphne is the most potent in terms of the antioxidant and antimutagenic properties (Table II). Specifically, it exhibits strong antioxidant activity since it has the ability to reduce DPPH• radical in lower IC50 (i.e., 10.88 μg of extract/ml) compared to the extracts from Muscat and Rhoditis (IC50 values equal to 15.61 and 14.87 μg of extract/ml, respectively). Mavrodaphne is also more efficient in reducing superoxide radical (O2−•) in comparison to Muscat (IC50 values equal to 36.12 and 44.63 μg of extract/ml, respectively). Additionally, Mavrodaphne is more potent in reducing Fe+3 to Fe+2 assessed through the reducing power assay (IC50 value: 2.59 μg of extract/ml) compared to Muscat and Rhoditis (IC50 values equal to 3.37 and 2.77 μg of extract/ml, respectively).

Antimutagenic properties of the extracts. The stem extract of Mavrodaphne had also the ability to protect plasmid DNA from the mutagenic activity of peroxyl radicals (ROO•), evaluated by the plasmid relaxation assay, in lower concentration than the Rhoditis extract (IC50 values equal to 131.38 and 168.06 μg of extract/ml, respectively). Overall, the grape stem extract derived from Mavrodaphne vine exerted statistically significant stronger antioxidant and antimutagenic properties compared to the extracts of Muscat and Rhoditis (Table II).

Discussion

The present study investigated the biological properties of three grape stem extracts derived from Mavrodaphne, Muscat and Rhoditis, which are native Greek vine varieties. All tested extracts exhibited strong antioxidant and antimutagenic activity. Overall, the extract generated from Mavrodaphne is the most potent compared to the other two since it is more efficient in reducing the DPPH• and the O2−• radicals and the Fe3+ to Fe2+ assessed through the reducing power assay. In addition, it appears that it protects the peroxyl radical induced oxidative modification of plasmid DNA in lower concentration than the extracts from Muscat and Rhoditis (Table II). These findings assert that all three grape stem extracts are important antioxidant agents and, hence, potentially beneficial for human health. Therefore, they may be used as constituents of bio-functional foods.

On the basis of the chemical composition of the tested extracts, it is evident that they are rich in polyphenolic compounds that belong to the greater class of flavonoids and specifically, flavanols and flavonols along with proanthocyanidins, hydroxybenzoic acids and stilbenes. However, the comparison of the constituents between the three extracts reveals no distinct differentiations. This means that neither of the extracts surpasses the others in terms of the concentration of specific polyphenols. It has to be mentioned, though, that the Mavrodaphne extract has the higher total polyphenolic content than the other two (Table I). Hence, the fact that it exhibits the most potent antioxidant and antimutagenic properties could partly attributed to its richness in polyphenols. It is also interesting that the IC50 values of all extracts in the reducing power assay is approximately 50-fold lower than those in the plasmid relaxation assay. This is in line with experimental evidence reporting that flavonoids exert greater ability to protect against metal-ion (Fe ions in our case) induced oxidation than peroxidation due to peroxyl radicals (29).

A crucial innovation of the present investigation is the evaluation of the notable biological properties of grape stems in the form of extracts that are a rather underestimated source of chemical compounds (i.e., polyphenols) with beneficial roles in human health (10). Moreover, we studied the extracts derived from three native Greek vine varieties that are among the most distinguishable and, at the same time, the less examined for their putative antioxidant properties. The manifold roles of polyphenolic compounds in human health have been demonstrated by numerous studies. Indeed, there is evidence implying that they contribute to the prevention or inhibition of cardiovascular diseases (30) and specific cancer types (31), whereas they delay the degenerative effects of aging, which is a redox related condition (4). Furthermore, muscadine grape extracts rich in polyphenols have shown strong positive correlation with growth inhibition of breast cancer cells (32). Polyphenolic compounds are also antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory agents especially due to their multifaceted antioxidant properties, which are ascribed either by the direct scavenging of free radicals and chelation of metal ions or through the regulation of redox signaling pathways and the expression of genes coding for enzymes involved in the antioxidant defence of blood and tissues (18, 33).

Apart from the direct advantageous effects of polyphenols on human health, they can also indirectly maintain a healthy wellbeing through their usage as food preservatives (34). Due to their antioxidant properties they are able to preserve the colour, the flavour and the odour of foods and their nutritional value by blocking the oxidative spoiling of vitamins, lipids and other fundamental constituents (35, 36). Moreover, they protect foods against microbes and therefore they are considered as promising bio-functional foods (37). The bioavailability of polyphenolic compounds is also another trait that leads to their wide usage (38). To that end, it has repeatedly demonstrated that procyanidins and flavonoids derived from grapes are rapidly absorbed in plasma where their peak concentration is observed 2-3 h after consumption (39, 40). Moreover, specific metabolites of polyphenols after a two-week consumption of red wine were detected in plasma indicating that they are normally absorbed by human blood and, hence, they can act beneficially (4, 30). Nevertheless, we have to keep in mind that polyphenols in higher concentrations can also act as pro-oxidants (4). Additionally, the effects of some high-molecular weight polyphenolic compounds may be negative because they cannot be absorbed and phytochemicals with specific molecular structures usually have the same impact (41).

The polyphenolic compounds are the constituents with the higher concentration in the tested grape stem extracts. Although grape pomace and seeds have been extensively studied, stems have surprisingly gained less attention regarding their biological roles (42). Grape stems are collected before the winemaking procedure and constitute 5% of the wine by-products. They are usually incorporated in ruminant feed or for the generation of compost, but in the majority of the cases they are disposed to the environment (43). Their disposal causes serious environmental problems because stems contain high organic material that is biodegraded in the soil and waters (11). Therefore, one of the greater challenges for the scientific community is to exploit this by-product so that the human health is promoted and the environment is protected. This could happen through the recovery and isolation of the phytochemicals that are contained in the grape stems. These compounds can subsequently be used in favour of human society as it has been stated in the previous paragraphs due to their potent antioxidant properties (13-17). Another way is to utilize the grape stems per se by incorporating them into the cosmetics, and in products of pharmaceutical and food industry (34). In that sense, they can be incorporated in edible products in order to promote certain aspects of human health and, thus, can be adopted as bio-functional foods (42). Apart from the obvious advantages, the stems can offer economic profit also since they are considered a cheap source of antioxidants, which can easily be recovered (10).

In conclusion, the present study reports that the grape stems derived from Mavrodaphne, Muscat and Rhoditis native Greek vine varieties are, to our knowledge, evaluated for the first time in terms of their antioxidant and antimutagenic properties. All of them exert strong biological activities and, according to our findings, the extract of Mavrodaphne is the most potent compared to the other two. These extracts are rich sources of polyphenolic compounds to which their antioxidant activity is mainly attributed to. Given that the grape stems have scarcely been studied, their beneficial biological role, observed herein, dictates that they can be used as ingredients of bio-functional foods in order to promote or improve certain aspects of human health.

Acknowledgements

This research project was funded by the Action “RESEARCH - CREATE - INNOVATE” supported by the Operational Programme Competitiveness, Entrepreneurship and Innovation 2014-2020 (EPAnEK) and the European Union.

Footnotes

  • Authors' Contributions

    DK, KP, SH: Conception and design of the study; EV, SH: Conduction of the experiments. ASV, EV: Statistical analysis; ASV, MK, EA, DK: Interpretation of the data; ASV, EV: Writing of the manuscript. All Authors drafted the final version of the manuscript.

  • Conflicts of Interest

    The Authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this study.

  • Received February 25, 2020.
  • Revision received March 10, 2020.
  • Accepted March 11, 2020.
  • Copyright© 2020, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved

References

  1. ↵
    1. Bender DAA
    : Dictionary of food and nutrition. New York: Oxford University Press, 2009. DOI: 10.1093/acref/9780199234875.001.0001
  2. ↵
    1. McGovern PE
    : Ancient wine: The search for the origins of viniculture. Princeton Univ Press, Princeton, 2003.
  3. ↵
    1. Myles S,
    2. Boyko AR,
    3. Owens CL,
    4. Brown PJ,
    5. Grassi F,
    6. Aradhya MK,
    7. Prins B,
    8. Reynolds A,
    9. Chia JM,
    10. Ware D,
    11. Bustamante CD,
    12. Buckler ES
    : Genetic structure and domestication history of the grape. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108(9): 3530-3535, 2011. PMID: 21245334. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1009363108
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Xia EQ,
    2. Deng GF,
    3. Guo YJ,
    4. Li HB
    : Biological activities of polyphenols from grapes. Int J Mol Sci 11(2): 622-646, 2010. PMID: 20386657. DOI: 10.3390/ijms11020622
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Latruffe N,
    2. Rifler JP
    : Bioactive polyphenols from grapes and wine emphasized with resveratrol. Current Pharmaceutical Design 19(34): 6053-6063, 2013. PMID: 23448444. DOI: 10.2174/1381612811319340002
    OpenUrl
  6. ↵
    1. Keys AB,
    2. Keys M
    : How to eat well and stay well, the Mediterranean way. New York: Doubleday, 1975.
  7. ↵
    1. Keys AB
    : Seven countries: a multivariate analysis of death and coronary heart disease. Cambridge, Mass Harvard University Press, 1980. DOI: 10.1001/jama.1981.03310300063026
  8. ↵
    1. Gonzalez-Centeno MR,
    2. Rossello C,
    3. Simal S,
    4. Garau MR,
    5. Lopez F,
    6. Femenia A
    : Physico-chemical properties of cell wall materials obtained from ten grape varieties and their byproducts: grape pomaces and stems. LWT Food Sci Technol 43: 1580e-1586e, 2010. DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2010.06.024
    OpenUrl
  9. ↵
    1. Kafantaris I,
    2. Kotsampasi B,
    3. Vladimiros C,
    4. Makri S,
    5. Stagos D,
    6. Gerasopoulos K,
    7. Petrotos K,
    8. Goulas P,
    9. Kouretas D
    : Effects of dietary grape pomace supplementation on performance, carcass traits and meat quality of lambs. In Vivo 32(4): 807-812, 2018. PMID: 29936462. DOI: 10.21873/invivo.112311
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. Barros A,
    2. Gironés-Vilaplana A,
    3. Texeira A,
    4. Baenas N,
    5. Domínguez-Perles R
    : Grape stems as a source of bioactive compounds: Application towards added-value commodities and significance for human health. Phytochem Rev 14: 921-931, 2015. DOI: 10.1007/s11101-015-9421-5
    OpenUrl
  11. ↵
    1. Makris DP,
    2. Boskou G,
    3. Andrikopoulos N
    : Polyphenolic content and in vitro antioxidant characteristics of wine industry and other agri-food solid waste extracts. J Food Comp Anal 20: 125-132, 2007. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfca.2006.04.010
    OpenUrl
  12. ↵
    1. Shrikhande A
    : Wine by-products with health benefits. Food Res Int 33(6): 469-474, 2000. PMID: 28454964. DOI: 10.1016/S0963-9969(00)00071-5
    OpenUrl
  13. ↵
    1. Spanou C,
    2. Veskoukis A.S,
    3. Stagos D,
    4. Liadaki K,
    5. Anastasiadi M,
    6. Haroutounian S.A,
    7. Tsouka M,
    8. Tzanakouli E,
    9. Kouretas D
    : Effects of grape extracts on the in vitro activity of enzymes involved in oxidative stress regulation. In Vivo 25(4): 657-662, 2011. PMID: 21709010.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    1. Goutzourelas N,
    2. Stagos D,
    3. Spanidis Y,
    4. Liosi M,
    5. Apostolou A,
    6. Priftis A,
    7. Haroutounian S,
    8. Spandidos DA,
    9. Tsatsakis AM,
    10. Kouretas D
    : Polyphenolic composition of grape stem extracts affects antioxidant activity in endothelial and muscle cells. Mol Med Rep 12(4): 5846-5856, 2015. PMID: 26300227. DOI: 10.3892/mmr.2015.4216
    OpenUrl
  15. ↵
    1. Stagos D,
    2. Apostolou A,
    3. Poulios E,
    4. Kermeliotou E,
    5. Mpatzilioti A,
    6. Kreatsouli K,
    7. Koulocheri SD,
    8. Haroutounian SA,
    9. Kouretas D
    : Antiangiogenic potential of grape stem extract through inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor expression. J. Physiol Pharmacol 65(6): 843-852, 2014. PMID: 25554988.
    OpenUrl
    1. Sahpazidou D,
    2. Geromichalos G.D,
    3. Stagos D,
    4. Apostolou A,
    5. Haroutounian S,
    6. Tsatsakis AM,
    7. Tzanakakis GN,
    8. Hayes AW,
    9. Kouretas D
    : Anticarcinogenic activity of polyphenolic extracts from grape stems against breast, colon, renal and thyroid cancer cells. Toxicol Lett 230(2): 218-224, 2014. PMID: 24508987. DOI: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2014.01.042
    OpenUrl
  16. ↵
    1. Apostolou A,
    2. Stagos D,
    3. Galitsiou E,
    4. Spyrou A,
    5. Haroutounian SA,
    6. Portesis N,
    7. Trizoglou I,
    8. Wallace Hayes A,
    9. Tsatsakis AM,
    10. Kouretas D
    : Assessment of polyphenolic content, antioxidant activity, protection against ROS-induced DNA damage and anticancer activity of Vitis vinifera stem extracts. Food Chem Toxicol 61: 60-68, 2013. PMID: 23380202. DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2013.01.029
    OpenUrl
  17. ↵
    1. Veskoukis AS,
    2. Tsatsakis AM,
    3. Kouretas D
    : Dietary oxidative stress and antioxidant defence with an emphasis on plant extract administration. Cell Stress Chaperones 17(1): 11-21, 2012a. PMID: 21956695. DOI:10.1007/s12192-011-0293-3
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Veskoukis A,
    2. Kerasioti E,
    3. Priftis A,
    4. Kouka P,
    5. Spanidis Y,
    6. Makri S,
    7. Kouretas D
    : A battery of translational biomarkers for the assessment of the in vitro and in vivo antioxidant action of plant polyphenolic compounds: The biomarker issue. Curr Opin Toxicol 13: 99-109, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.cotox.2018.10.001
    OpenUrl
  19. ↵
    1. Grossman HJ
    : Grossman's Guide to wines, spirits & beers. 7th Edition, Wiley, 1983.
  20. ↵
    1. Clarke O
    : Encyclopedia of Grapes, edition no. 1.; Websters International Publishers, Orlando, Florida, 2001.
  21. ↵
    1. Robinson J
    : “The Oxford Companion to Wine” Third Edition, Oxford University Press, 2006.
  22. ↵
    1. Singleton VL,
    2. Orthofer R,
    3. Lamuela-Raventos RM
    : Analysis of total phenols and other oxidation substrates and antioxidants by means of Folin–Ciocalteu reagent. Meth Enzymol 299: 152-178, 1999. DOI: 10.1016/S0076-6879(99)99017-1
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  23. ↵
    1. Kerasioti E,
    2. Apostolou A,
    3. Kafantaris I,
    4. Chronis K,
    5. Kokka E,
    6. Dimitriadou C,
    7. Tzanetou EN,
    8. Priftis A,
    9. Koulocheri SD,
    10. Haroutounian SA,
    11. Kouretas D,
    12. Stagos D
    : Polyphenolic composition of Rosa canina, Rosa sempervivens and Pyrocantha coccinea extracts and assessment of their antioxidant activity in human endothelial cells. Antioxidants (Basel) 8(4): 92, 2019. PMID: 30959906. DOI: 10.3390/antiox8040092
    OpenUrl
  24. ↵
    1. Jia Z,
    2. Tang MC,
    3. Wu JM
    : The determination of flavonoid contents in mulberry and their scavenging effects on superoxide radicals. Food Chem 64: 555-559, 1999. DOI: 10.1016/S0308-8146(98)00102-2
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  25. ↵
    1. Veskoukis A.S,
    2. Kyparos A,
    3. Nikolaidis M.G,
    4. Stagos D,
    5. Aligiannis N,
    6. Halabalaki M,
    7. Chronis K,
    8. Goutzourelas N,
    9. Skaltsounis L,
    10. Kouretas D
    : The antioxidant effects of a polyphenol-rich grape pomace extract in vitro do not correspond in vivo using exercise as an oxidant stimulus. Oxid Med Cell Longev 2012: 185867, 2012. PMID: 22693650. DOI: 10.1155/2012/185867
    OpenUrlPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Kouka P,
    2. Tekos F,
    3. Valta K,
    4. Mavros P,
    5. Veskoukis AS,
    6. Angelis A,
    7. Skaltsounis AL,
    8. Kouretas D
    : Olive tree blossom polyphenolic extracts exert antioxidant and antimutagenic activities in vitro and in various cell lines. Oncol Rep 42(6): 2814-2825, 2019. PMID: 31661143. DOI: 10.3892/or.2019.7386
    OpenUrl
  27. ↵
    1. Maron DM,
    2. Ames BN
    : Revised methods for the Salmonella mutagenicity test. Mutat Res 113: 173-215, 1983. PMID: 6341825. DOI: 10.1016/0165-1161(83)90010-9
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Arora A,
    2. Nair MG,
    3. Strasburg GM
    : Structure-activity relationships for antioxidant activities of a series of flavonoids in a liposomal system. Free Radic Biol Med 24: 1355-1363, 1998. PMID: 9641252. DOI: 10.1016/s0891-5849(97)00458-9
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Tsanga C,
    2. Higginsa S,
    3. Duthiea GG,
    4. Duthiea SJ,
    5. Howiea M,
    6. Mullena W,
    7. Leana MEJ,
    8. Crozier A
    : The influence of moderate red wine consumption on antioxidant status and indices of oxidative stress associated with CHD in healthy volunteers. Br J Nutr 93: 233–240, 2005. PMID: 15788107. DOI: 10.1079/bjn20041311
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Jung K,
    2. Wallig M,
    3. Singletary K
    : Purple grape juice inhibits 7,12-dimethylbenz-[a]anthracene (DMBA)-induced rat mammary tumorigenesis and in vivo DMBA-DNA adduct formation. Cancer Lett 233: 279-288, 2006. PMID: 15878797. DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2005.03.020
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Mendonca P,
    2. Darwish AG,
    3. Tsolova V,
    4. El-Sharkawy I,
    5. Soliman KFA
    : The anticancer and antioxidant effects of muscadine grape extracts on racially different triple-negative breast cancer cells. Anticancer Res 39(8): 4043-4053, 2019. PMID: 31366486. DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.13560
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. ↵
    1. Soobrattee MA,
    2. Neergheena VS,
    3. Luximon-Rammaa A,
    4. Aruomab OI,
    5. Bahoruna T
    : Phenolics as potential antioxidant therapeutic agents: Mechanism and actions. Mut Res Fund Mol Mech Mutagen 579: 200-213, 2005. DOI: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2005.03.023
    OpenUrl
  33. ↵
    1. Doshi P,
    2. Adsule P,
    3. Banerjee K,
    4. Oulkar D
    : Phenolic compounds, antioxidant activity and insulinotropic effect of extracts prepared from grape (Vitis vinifera L) byproducts. J Food Sci Technol 52(1): 181-190, 2015. PMID: 25593367. DOI: 10.1007/s13197-013-0991-1
    OpenUrl
  34. ↵
    1. Aliakbarian B,
    2. Dehghani F,
    3. Perego P
    : The effect of citric acid on the phenolic contents of olive oil. Food Chem 116(3): 617-623, 2009. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2009.02.077
    OpenUrl
  35. ↵
    1. Moure A,
    2. Cruz JM,
    3. Franco D,
    4. Dominguez JM,
    5. Sineiro J,
    6. Dominguez H
    : Natural antioxidants from residual sources. Food Chem 72(2): 145-171, 2001. DOI: 10.1016/S0308-8146(00) 00223-5
    OpenUrl
  36. ↵
    1. Rodriguez-Vaquero MJ,
    2. Alberto MR,
    3. Manca-de-Nadra MC
    : Antibacterial effect of phenolic compounds from different wines. Food Control 18: 93-101, 2007. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2005.08.010
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  37. ↵
    1. Urpi-Sarda M,
    2. Monagas M,
    3. Khan N,
    4. Lamuela-Raventos RM,
    5. Santos-Buelga C,
    6. Sacanella E,
    7. Castell M,
    8. Permanyer J,
    9. Andres-Lacueva C
    : Epicatechin, procyanidins, and phenolic microbial metabolites after cocoa intake in humans and rats. Anal Bioanal Chem 394: 1545-1556, 2009. PMID: 19333587. DOI: 10.1007/s00216-009-2676-1
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. ↵
    1. Bell JRC,
    2. Donovan JL,
    3. Wong R,
    4. Waterhouse AL,
    5. German JB,
    6. Walzem RL,
    7. Kasim-Karakas SE
    : (+)-Catechin in human plasma after ingestion of a single serving of reconstituted red wine. Am J Clin Nutr 71: 103-108, 2000. PMID: 10617953. DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/71.1.103
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  39. ↵
    1. Cilla A,
    2. Gonzalez-Sarrias A,
    3. Tomas-Barberan FA,
    4. Espin JC,
    5. Barbera R
    : Availability of polyphenols in fruit beverages subjected to in vitro gastrointestinal digestion and their effects on proliferation, cell-cycle and apoptosis in human colon cancer Caco-2 cells. Food Chem 114: 813-820, 2009. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2008.10.019
    OpenUrl
  40. ↵
    1. Ugartondo V,
    2. Mitjans M,
    3. Lozano C,
    4. Torres JL,
    5. Vinardell MP
    : Comparative study of the cytotoxicity induced by antioxidant epicatechin conjugates obtained from grape. J Agric Food Chem 54: 6945-6950, 2006. PMID: 16939362. DOI: 10.1021/jf061356i
    OpenUrlPubMed
  41. ↵
    1. Ruiz-Moreno MJ,
    2. Raposo R,
    3. Cayuela JM,
    4. Zafrilla P,
    5. Piñeiro Z,
    6. Moreno-Rojas JM,
    7. Mulero J,
    8. Puertas B,
    9. Giron F,
    10. Guerrero RF,
    11. Cantos-Villar E
    : Valorization of grape stems. Ind Crop Prod 63: 152-157, 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2014.10.016
    OpenUrl
  42. ↵
    1. Anastasiadi M,
    2. Pratsinis H,
    3. Kletsas D,
    4. Skaltsounis AL,
    5. Haroutounian SA
    : Grape stem extracts: polyphenolic content and assessment of their in vitro antioxidant properties. Food Sci Technol 48: 316-322, 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2012.04.006
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research: 40 (4)
Anticancer Research
Vol. 40, Issue 4
April 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Grape Stem Extracts From Three Native Greek Vine Varieties Exhibit Strong Antioxidant and Antimutagenic Properties
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
2 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Grape Stem Extracts From Three Native Greek Vine Varieties Exhibit Strong Antioxidant and Antimutagenic Properties
ARISTIDIS S. VESKOUKIS, ELENI VASSI, KONSTANTINOS POULAS, MANOLIS KOKKINAKIS, EFTIHIA ASPRODINI, SERKOS HAROUTOUNIAN, DEMETRIOS KOURETAS
Anticancer Research Apr 2020, 40 (4) 2025-2032; DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.14159

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Grape Stem Extracts From Three Native Greek Vine Varieties Exhibit Strong Antioxidant and Antimutagenic Properties
ARISTIDIS S. VESKOUKIS, ELENI VASSI, KONSTANTINOS POULAS, MANOLIS KOKKINAKIS, EFTIHIA ASPRODINI, SERKOS HAROUTOUNIAN, DEMETRIOS KOURETAS
Anticancer Research Apr 2020, 40 (4) 2025-2032; DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.14159
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Biofunctional Feed Supplemented With By-products of Olive Oil Production Improves Tissue Antioxidant Profile of Lambs
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Simvastatin Enhances the Radiosensitivity of Androgen-independent Prostate Cancer Cells via Inhibition of RAD51 Expression
  • Luminal B Breast Cancer Coexpressing p62 and ALDH1A3 Is Less Susceptible to Radiotherapy
  • Recombinant Methioninase Decreased the Effective Dose of Irinotecan by 15-fold Against Colon Cancer Cells: A Strategy for Effective Low-toxicity Treatment of Colon Cancer
Show more Experimental Studies

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Grape stem extracts
  • Greek vine varieties
  • antioxidants
  • antimutagenic properties
  • polyphenols
  • bio-functional foods
Anticancer Research

© 2024 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire